You are not ready for hard math if you do not understand this problem

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • In this video, I am working on this killer calculus problem from Korean SAT Math. With this problem, we use challenging integral, with advanced calculus skills to get areas, and also the trigonometric functions to deal with for the final answer. See if you understand this problem for hard math.
    #integral #calculus #koreansatmath

Комментарии • 61

  • @drpkmath1234
    @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад +5

    Hello all. At 5:55, I accidentally put = sign, where I was supposed to put an arrow sign as I am getting the integral of f(x) from 2 to 4 by using the integral of g(2x) from 1 to 2, so they are not equal. My bad for mistakenly putting = sign. Enjoy!

    • @domedebali632
      @domedebali632 Месяц назад

      Figured professor. Your work is just great

  • @peterkwan1448
    @peterkwan1448 Месяц назад +8

    I don't understand why the integral of f(x) from 2 to 4 is equal to the integral of g(2x) from 1 to 2, using the condition that g(2x)=2f(x).
    I get lost because you found that the integral of f(x) from 2 to 4 is equal to 5/2, and then you found later that the area (which should be the same as the integral) is equal to 7.
    Similarly, I don't understand why the integral of f(x) from 4 to 8 is equal to the integral of g(2x) from 2 to 4, using the condition that g(2x)=2f(x).

    • @iqtrainer
      @iqtrainer Месяц назад +1

      Thats really basic one, change of boundaries. Look at what g(x) is

    • @iqtrainer
      @iqtrainer Месяц назад +2

      @@pietergeerkens6324 To me, I believe Dr PK applied some technique that is more relevant to time-test taking strategy. I got to figure this out by knowing an area of an inverse function is to look at y-axis just like when you look at x-axis for the area of regular f(x). Then, everything seems so logical and nice. But guess what, it took quite a bit of time to understand this too

    • @himanshukumar8881
      @himanshukumar8881 Месяц назад

      Yes i also had problem in understanding it 😢

    • @MrGLA-zs8xt
      @MrGLA-zs8xt Месяц назад +3

      @@himanshukumar8881 Seems like DR PK used geometric approach along with the calculus so it requires some high level mathematical understanding as Peter said. Having geometric eye is the key on DR PK's solution here

    • @himanshukumar8881
      @himanshukumar8881 Месяц назад

      @@MrGLA-zs8xt yes but he has to give some hint how integration of f(x) from 2 to 4 = integration g(2x) from 1 to 2 .

  • @baidonchandipo2804
    @baidonchandipo2804 Месяц назад +5

    Wow you're really good. I always enjoy your videos

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Haha thanks a lot my friend for your support! I really appreciate it👍👍👍

  • @himanshukumar8881
    @himanshukumar8881 Месяц назад +2

    Professor is there any direct relationship between integration of function and its inverse.
    Say f(x) = x^2 it's inverse f^-1= √x
    The integration of f(x) form 1 to 3 = ??? In terms of its inverse.
    The relationship between f(x) and its inverse is f(x) =[ f^-1 (x) ] ^ 4

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад +1

      Hello my friend! Yes there is but that direct formula is a bit messy to memorize haha. Called Laisant formula. 👍👍👍

    • @himanshukumar8881
      @himanshukumar8881 Месяц назад

      @@drpkmath1234 thank you professor

  • @TheFirstGagoz
    @TheFirstGagoz Месяц назад +2

    A hard and interesting question professor, amazing solution🙌🏻

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Thanks a lot my friend for your support haha. I appreciate it👍👍👍

  • @Dheeraj5373
    @Dheeraj5373 Месяц назад +1

    Man i also had followed you on twitter too

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад +1

      Thats great to know my friend! Thanks for the support👍👍👍

  • @Dheeraj5373
    @Dheeraj5373 Месяц назад +1

    Why that curve is their while intergrating or summing up area

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Hello my friend! I used the graphing method using how g(x) is an inverse of f(x)👍👍👍

  • @domedebali632
    @domedebali632 Месяц назад +1

    Wowww, I love this question, though this was a bit hard for me

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Thanks a lot my friend👍👍👍

  • @iqtrainer
    @iqtrainer Месяц назад +1

    Very professionally done prof🎉

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Thanks a lot my friend haha👍👍👍

  • @MrGLA-zs8xt
    @MrGLA-zs8xt Месяц назад +1

    Another great video prof.

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      Thanks a lot my friend haha👍👍👍

  • @facilvenir
    @facilvenir Месяц назад +1

    I guess I'm not ready for hard math yet.. and I didn't even watch the video!

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад +1

      Haha go ahead and watch it my friend👍👍👍

    • @facilvenir
      @facilvenir Месяц назад

      @drpkmath1234 I watched it. I understood all of it, but I don't think I could've done it myself.

  • @hehexd9781
    @hehexd9781 Месяц назад +1

    Couldnt the answer be k(139 +4) for any k equal or greater to 1?

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад

      No, not really😂😂😂

    • @hehexd9781
      @hehexd9781 Месяц назад

      @@drpkmath1234oh i didnt see that p and q are relative prime

  • @kakarot4023
    @kakarot4023 Месяц назад

    How integral of f(x) from 2 to 4 is 5/2 and also 7 ?

    • @drpkmath1234
      @drpkmath1234  Месяц назад +1

      See I was getting integtal of f(x) from 2 to 4 using 5/2.👍👍👍

  • @hehexd9781
    @hehexd9781 Месяц назад +1

    How do you know that f(2) = 2???

    • @cocogranate1348
      @cocogranate1348 Месяц назад

      Yes I would love to know that

    • @MrGLA-zs8xt
      @MrGLA-zs8xt Месяц назад +2

      g(2x) is 2f(x). this is given from the question. f(1) is 1, this is also given from the question. now it is easy to see f(2) is 2.

    • @josepereira2759
      @josepereira2759 Месяц назад +3

      He doesnt explain well…
      it makes sense the following:
      g(2) = 2f(1) = 2
      Using that g is inverse of f:
      g(f(2)) = 2,
      Notice that g is injective.
      If you don’t remember what this means: if g(x)= g(y) -> x = y.
      Now we can conclude f(2) = 2, because
      g(2) = 2 = g(f(2)),
      Using, injectivity:
      g(f(2)) = g(2) -> f(2) = 2

    • @hehexd9781
      @hehexd9781 Месяц назад +1

      @@josepereira2759 i thought injective meant that for each y value possible, there is only one x value that points to it

    • @josepereira2759
      @josepereira2759 Месяц назад

      @@hehexd9781 it is equivalent:
      suppose f(x) = f(y) , since there is only one x to each f(x) and we know that f(x) = f(y), then x cannot be different from y, this means x = y.