@George Thomas yeah. They use to use the jets with afterburners. They canned that and brought in the Globe Master C-17. They fly over my house all the time. I live near the airbase. Beautiful bird that one 👌🏼
First one: Careful, careful, careful, done! Second one: *reconnect controller notification sound* Third one: *D-R-I-F-T* Last one: "Sir, what's the motivation of the call?" "You're fired (at)"
Yes...at slow speed, with little payload, a tiny range and marginal air combat capability. Be proud. Be proud of mediocre first over excellence period.
Mk1 was called the "Flying bedstead." The Mk2 saw active service in 1982 and shot down 101 aircraft, including helicopters, for ZERO loss. Migs, Etend Darts included. It took out targets head on with missiles (thought impossible at the time) stationary and a couple flying backwards. The GR4 had twice the range and armaments. Not bad for a Flying Bedstead. So much so the US, having passed the plane up as a joke, purchased them and redesigned VTOL into the next generation of planes. In combat simulations in 1981, HMS Hermes sank 2 US Carriers and damaged 2 escort ships - and they never saw them coming until they waved at the captain through the bridge window. I was there. The UK to date is the only country that successfully nuked the US in exercises and took down their air defences - TWICE. Different planes but the same mission. Winning.
Nice AI simulation on the Russian aircraft carrier. Strangely enough the software didn't produce any wake or disturbance on the water surface as the jet flew a few feet above it with full afterburner!!!
Never hit an arresting wire or even had a tail hook and manages to stop with one afterburner going... And sad part is some of the people think it's not fake.
I'm already a sucker that believed these were real until I read the comments. In 3-5 years, it will literally be impossible to tell what's real and what's fake
The clip where the Su-27 Flanker pitched its nose straight up before slamming into the carrier deck was from the DCS World simulator game. But I'm just a school bus driver and don't know much about nothing, so feel free to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. :)
Oh, good. RUclips finally populated the comments and confirmed it was from a game and the person who made this collection of short videos probably missed it.
They forgot 2 add the water being kicked up by the jets of the 2nd one there ,they did go as far as to add a shadow at the least, all they needed to do was use the trail from a speed boat or something and edit that in. it would have made it look so much more real & imagine how much crap a pilot would be in for pulling a stunt like that if it was real Lols the last one is real though as that's a flight through Brisbane I remember seeing it done by the raaf
That's was some COOL G RAPP navigation, especially the one that was closer to the water and landed on the aircraft carrier,and the whole thing about alien knowledge.... there it is right there
Pretty soon the only way to know for sure if you are seeing anything real, will be if you saw it in person. And even that will be questionable. The faster we progress, the faster we reach our finish line.
Ладно, допустим не все заметили на втором видео компьютерную симуляцию посадки российского истребителя семейства СУ 27/30 на палубу авианосца где стоят американские F/A-18E/F «Супер Хорнет»))
The small passenger plane was doing what a plane I was on was doing. Talk about a wild ride. When you're in the window seat and you're looking straight down the runway. Yeah that's not cool. Like riding a 3 legged donkey. Not much fun. LOL.
That second one.....you know the Conversation was " Hello , Tower, Permission for a low speed pass, for visual gear inspection" Tower: Negative ,GhostRider....the Pattern is Full, and we're stacked with Ops. Then the Tail Stand Float by of the Bridge, and then the Flamethrower Drop to the Deck... LEGEND!
The fact is that the F35 is a copy of the Soviet Yak-141 carrier-based fighter. If you look at them from above and from the side, they are similar, like twins. The fact of cooperation between Yakovlev Design Bureau and Lockheed Martin is no secret to anyone : "The F-35B (modification of the F-35 with GDP) is very close to the Yak-141 in design and layout. A combined power plant (1 PMD + 1 lifting fan) is also used here, a compartment with a lifting fan (it performs the same function as the PD on the Yak) is also located behind the cockpit, and the nozzle of the lifting and main engine is also covered by tail beams, although their length is shorter. The design of the PMD nozzle uses the idea first embodied in the R79V-300 (segments rotating in opposite directions). This happened because in the mid-1990s, the company developing the F-35, Lockheed Martin, briefly collaborated with the Yakovlev Design Bureau. According to some reports, in 1995, the Yakovlevites, with the permission of the Russian government, sold all the documentation on the Yak-38 and Yak-141 to the Americans." Thus, American engineers, instead of developing their own concept of a single fifth-generation fighter platform, genetically related to previous technological solutions, simply licked the Soviet development, and not only the engine, but also the aerodynamic scheme. The Americans paid attention to the Soviet fighter, as it surpassed in its capabilities both the British Harriers and the prototypes of the French Mirages of a similar type. The tests of the YAK-141, on prototypes of which several world records were set, were interrupted due to an accident when the permissible speed of descent was exceeded when landing on the Admiral Gorshkov TAC. The aircraft did not go into production, and no foreign orders were received for it. Apparently, that's why he was "sold" to the Americans. Moreover, our military refused to use aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing. A number of experts believe that the Achilles heel of the Yak-141 was the decision of the USSR Ministry of Defense to make this multi-purpose aircraft. That is, to combine a fighter, a bomber and an attack aircraft in one design, and even with vertical takeoff and landing. The creators of the F-35 had the same idea. World experience in the development of military equipment shows that universalism, if applied excessively, can lead to a decrease in reliability and deterioration of technical characteristics. Which is what happened in the case of the F-35. Research and production schools in the defense industry have been developing for decades. It is believed that at least three generations of designers and scientists are needed to become a competitive development team in the military-industrial complex. Therefore, even an innovation bought or stolen by spies sometimes simply cannot fit into its existing own design due to technological incompatibility with the systems of the "native" product. The continuity of generations of the scientific school of developers and competition with other design bureaus is the basis for success in creating advanced military equipment. Lockheed Martin engineers, in conditions of almost complete monopoly, uncritically copied the Soviet development that had not been brought to mind, and as a result, having spent a lot of money, they found themselves in a broken trough. + Some understandable gloating over the failure of our strategic opponents should not obscure our own problems. In particular, the monopoly of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, which has not yet been overcome, specializing only in heavy fighters, although our VKS also needs light front-line fighters of the MiG corporation, which the leadership of the UAC, as if following the "precepts" of Mikhail Poghosyan, keeps in the "black body" for an unacceptably long time. Author: Vladimir Prokhvatilov, President of the Academy of Realpolitik, expert of the Academy of Military Sciences.
@@George.Coleman don’t be ashamed unless you where one of the poor souls tasked with working in or around a c17. the big difference that popped first for me was not being a prop.
I think we need to start making runways on water with strong safety measures of course but it would save a lot more loves wait no that wouldn't work either sorry
Just in case anyone was wondering, the second landing (cobra manoeuvre onto the aircraft carrier) is actually not real. It's a flight sim called DCS.
Even if the graphics fooled you, why would a flanker lamd on a carrier woth hormets 😂
Yes
Digital Combat Simulator
Not even a proper cobra manoeuvre.
After 2nd landing, pilot had to go to his room and finish his homework.
Pay for the jet he just totaled
Na, he's an adrenaline junky. I can tell! I'm thinking damn, that looks like a rush! I hate being old!!
@@markmccarty9793 Psssttt.....the second landing is a computer game simulation.
@@nlabanok !!, ok
The second one was dcs bro, digital combat simulator world come on
The last one is real. C-17 flying through Brisbane on River Fire Show 👌🏼
@George Thomas yeah. They use to use the jets with afterburners. They canned that and brought in the Globe Master C-17. They fly over my house all the time. I live near the airbase. Beautiful bird that one 👌🏼
It’s huge! And it’s very maneuverable
The guy in the twin engine turboprop earned his pay. He should have gone around to a runway more inline with that cross wind.
My name is Giovanni Georgio, I don't always land a plane, but when I do...
Video games looks so real nowadays Man!!!!😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😮😮😮😮😮
Pilot must have gotten a new high score on that second landing
Lol
If there were ever cause for a go around.
Вторая посадка, игрушка!!!
yup, high score in a game
Nunca ouviram falar em stall.
Last one had me sketching
¿ a Russian Sulkhoi SU-35 on a US aircraft carrier...? 😄
Those pilots got mad skill and God's love
First one: Careful, careful, careful, done!
Second one: *reconnect controller notification sound*
Third one: *D-R-I-F-T*
Last one: "Sir, what's the motivation of the call?" "You're fired (at)"
That cowboy flying the crap outta that plane! 🤠
that second last passenger plane was an amazing landing, I remember seeing that on the news when it happened, great captain, well done.
That should have been a go around, at the point where he's looking at the runway through the side window lol. Worked out great on that occasion though
THIS is why I wanted to fly jets!!!!
F--king Phenomenal!!!!!
Is the F-king 'Phenomenal' the replacement for the F-35?
When you play too much GTA SA
This was a completely sick video. How there were no deaths only God knows. Wow!
British Harrier Jump Jet was doing that shit almost 60 years ago
Yes...at slow speed, with little payload, a tiny range and marginal air combat capability. Be proud.
Be proud of mediocre first over excellence period.
Widow maker...
Mk1 was called the "Flying bedstead." The Mk2 saw active service in 1982 and shot down 101 aircraft, including helicopters, for ZERO loss. Migs, Etend Darts included. It took out targets head on with missiles (thought impossible at the time) stationary and a couple flying backwards. The GR4 had twice the range and armaments. Not bad for a Flying Bedstead. So much so the US, having passed the plane up as a joke, purchased them and redesigned VTOL into the next generation of planes. In combat simulations in 1981, HMS Hermes sank 2 US Carriers and damaged 2 escort ships - and they never saw them coming until they waved at the captain through the bridge window. I was there. The UK to date is the only country that successfully nuked the US in exercises and took down their air defences - TWICE. Different planes but the same mission. Winning.
@@amitaimedan that was a class of Russian nuclear submarine. 2 were lost in peacetime with notoriously inefficient nuclear propulsion.
@@fshn4x4 Did the Harrier break as much as the F-35 does?
Nice simulation!
Beautiful Engineering.
The aircraft that landed on the carrier was INSANE! THAT took some serious skill!
Nice AI simulation on the Russian aircraft carrier. Strangely enough the software didn't produce any wake or disturbance on the water surface as the jet flew a few feet above it with full afterburner!!!
And the aircraft on deck are American! F/A-18. Crap simulation really and shouldn't be included with real aircraft vids
Never hit an arresting wire or even had a tail hook and manages to stop with one afterburner going... And sad part is some of the people think it's not fake.
I'm already a sucker that believed these were real until I read the comments. In 3-5 years, it will literally be impossible to tell what's real and what's fake
OMG. I was wondering when they taught F18 pilots how to land like that. Video game makes a lot more sense.
Simulated Sukhoi not a Hornet.
My name is Giovanni Giorgio…, but everybody calls me, Giorgio
MASSIVE TALENT !!!! 👌😉👍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
The clip where the Su-27 Flanker pitched its nose straight up before slamming into the carrier deck was from the DCS World simulator game.
But I'm just a school bus driver and don't know much about nothing, so feel free to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. :)
Oh, good. RUclips finally populated the comments and confirmed it was from a game and the person who made this collection of short videos probably missed it.
Графика огонь 🔥
There's just one out of four videos here that actually do justice to what title says.
Skills all day long! 😏🥇
They forgot 2 add the water being kicked up by the jets of the 2nd one there ,they did go as far as to add a shadow at the least, all they needed to do was use the trail from a speed boat or something and edit that in. it would have made it look so much more real & imagine how much crap a pilot would be in for pulling a stunt like that if it was real
Lols the last one is real though as that's a flight through Brisbane I remember seeing it done by the raaf
"No Piotr, you don't need F-35. We have VTOL at home"
Okay that last one was straight up scary😂
That was in Brisbane, Australia, along the Brisbane river, right next to the city centre.
Megalophobia
just off-the-charts! yes it may be showing off! but if you ever needed that situation with that manoeuvre this pilot is dialled!
Aaaaahhhhh technology!!! Isn't it extremely clumsy???
I’m so glad I have the opportunity on buildin this jet
This is beyond what i know but i would love to learn even at 59. I could do it!!!
Then go do it! Lifes too short!
Operate a video game? Cause thats what this is
RC planes is where it's at. All the excitement, none of the personal risk.
l could watch these all day long! Someday before l get too old l want to visit the Mach Loop
just purchase a ps4 or whatever they play these on...😃
Jolie montage vidéo.. t aurais du penser au souffle des réacteurs sur l eau !!!
А вы в Америке.Уже не отличаете,что монтаж,что нет...😃😃😃,Совсем сломались...
@@C...Ll_l...P они говорят по-французски, они французы 🧍♀️😐
@@Homepage. Ну по мне так это немцы
@@C...Ll_l...P 😂 что ты имеешь против немцев
2one is a game! The water wasn't perturbed by the aircraft engine
That's was some COOL G RAPP navigation, especially the one that was closer to the water and landed on the aircraft carrier,and the whole thing about alien knowledge.... there it is right there
F-35B's should eject fireworks and candy whenever they land vertically
For the F-35 originally I thought it was in slow-motion until I read the title 🤣🤣🤣
That’s Sick!!! Alien Technology At It’s Best!!! Lol
Negative Skully Rider, the Hudson is full.
That vertical landing all I can say is how omg
DCS
Pretty soon the only way to know for sure if you are seeing anything real, will be if you saw it in person. And even that will be questionable.
The faster we progress, the faster we reach our finish line.
Хороший мультик
At least some are CGI. I’m thinking all of them.
The first is most plausible. The other two are impossible.
Thanks
Вертикально на палубу 😮, оч похоже на Як 38, классный ролик
Cobra maneuver to catch the 3rd wire was impressive as hell.
Too bad it was done in DCS not real life
We're looking at $35 million dollars baby
Cute. Is either way make them quieter? They are causing long term hearing damage to everyone in town
So many Americans have suffered because of unregulated military spending….
That cobra landing was in a game btw for all of you thinking it was real
In the 2nd one everything was wrong, a land based soviet Su-27 from the soviet air force landing on a US supercarrier in a videogame
Ладно, допустим не все заметили на втором видео компьютерную симуляцию посадки российского истребителя семейства СУ 27/30 на палубу авианосца где стоят американские F/A-18E/F «Супер Хорнет»))
That C17 pilot got into trouble for that after every Karen and Kevin in Brisbane complained
2 landing: not even with flight simulation I can do these things
Pilot aircraft perfection.
Say that last clip doesn’t have 9-eleven vibes and I’ll say you aren’t familiar with the incident
Same way , as i showed them. ....me so proud 🤧🤧😅
I love watching out fighter jets here in Ak-49.
These are getting better and better
Not even the slightest ruffle on the water. Kudos to the Sea
DCS doesn't simulate jet wash. Not sure if there are mods available that do though. The other landings were real.
The small passenger plane was doing what a plane I was on was doing. Talk about a wild ride. When you're in the window seat and you're looking straight down the runway. Yeah that's not cool. Like riding a 3 legged donkey. Not much fun. LOL.
Apparently, some F 35s look different than others.
This thing is literally built different.
No disturbance on the water??
It was a simulator lol, or the water was just sleeping 😂lol
A Mig landing at a U.S aircraft carrier,,,freakin' hilarious,,,😂😂😂
I hate that last plane.
Waking me up and knocking down the household objects.
If it misses a day, I get sad though.
So I I love that last plane.
Last one is me in GTAV
cobra to a landing... nice graphics!
Yet, the thumbnail was a Russian jet doing a cobra maneuver over a carrier
Yeah, an America aircraft carrier. With American planes on it's deck......
American has. the greatest pilots. Reference maverick for proof 😅
Yeah…RIGHT MAN!!
글로브 마스터 묵직한게 즹말 좋다. 쌍발 프롭기 측풍 랜딩 기가막함
Incredible F-22 cobra to vertical aircraft carrier landing!
That second one.....you know the Conversation was
" Hello , Tower, Permission for a low speed pass, for visual gear inspection"
Tower: Negative ,GhostRider....the Pattern is Full, and we're stacked with Ops.
Then the Tail Stand Float by of the Bridge, and then the Flamethrower Drop to the Deck...
LEGEND!
F-35 is so advance, it can even land in the water!
Estos pilot's si se gana el chesco
The fact is that the F35 is a copy of the Soviet Yak-141 carrier-based fighter. If you look at them from above and from the side, they are similar, like twins.
The fact of cooperation between Yakovlev Design Bureau and Lockheed Martin is no secret to anyone :
"The F-35B (modification of the F-35 with GDP) is very close to the Yak-141 in design and layout. A combined power plant (1 PMD + 1 lifting fan) is also used here, a compartment with a lifting fan (it performs the same function as the PD on the Yak) is also located behind the cockpit, and the nozzle of the lifting and main engine is also covered by tail beams, although their length is shorter. The design of the PMD nozzle uses the idea first embodied in the R79V-300 (segments rotating in opposite directions). This happened because in the mid-1990s, the company developing the F-35, Lockheed Martin, briefly collaborated with the Yakovlev Design Bureau. According to some reports, in 1995, the Yakovlevites, with the permission of the Russian government, sold all the documentation on the Yak-38 and Yak-141 to the Americans."
Thus, American engineers, instead of developing their own concept of a single fifth-generation fighter platform, genetically related to previous technological solutions, simply licked the Soviet development, and not only the engine, but also the aerodynamic scheme.
The Americans paid attention to the Soviet fighter, as it surpassed in its capabilities both the British Harriers and the prototypes of the French Mirages of a similar type.
The tests of the YAK-141, on prototypes of which several world records were set, were interrupted due to an accident when the permissible speed of descent was exceeded when landing on the Admiral Gorshkov TAC. The aircraft did not go into production, and no foreign orders were received for it. Apparently, that's why he was "sold" to the Americans. Moreover, our military refused to use aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing. A number of experts believe that the Achilles heel of the Yak-141 was the decision of the USSR Ministry of Defense to make this multi-purpose aircraft. That is, to combine a fighter, a bomber and an attack aircraft in one design, and even with vertical takeoff and landing. The creators of the F-35 had the same idea. World experience in the development of military equipment shows that universalism, if applied excessively, can lead to a decrease in reliability and deterioration of technical characteristics. Which is what happened in the case of the F-35.
Research and production schools in the defense industry have been developing for decades. It is believed that at least three generations of designers and scientists are needed to become a competitive development team in the military-industrial complex.
Therefore, even an innovation bought or stolen by spies sometimes simply cannot fit into its existing own design due to technological incompatibility with the systems of the "native" product.
The continuity of generations of the scientific school of developers and competition with other design bureaus is the basis for success in creating advanced military equipment. Lockheed Martin engineers, in conditions of almost complete monopoly, uncritically copied the Soviet development that had not been brought to mind, and as a result, having spent a lot of money, they found themselves in a broken trough. +
Some understandable gloating over the failure of our strategic opponents should not obscure our own problems. In particular, the monopoly of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, which has not yet been overcome, specializing only in heavy fighters, although our VKS also needs light front-line fighters of the MiG corporation, which the leadership of the UAC, as if following the "precepts" of Mikhail Poghosyan, keeps in the "black body" for an unacceptably long time.
Author: Vladimir Prokhvatilov, President of the Academy of Realpolitik, expert of the Academy of Military Sciences.
C-17 WOW!!!!😮
Second aeroplane with red star is F35 🤣🤣🤣
I couldn’t even see the strings in the first one
I thought the last one was a replica of 9-11
Crew chief says we're putting new tires on.... again...
Antes sobrevivieron.
Cada rato se estrellan.
Cool but the last vid had me like whoa seems to close to buildings lol
it sure was, but it was some sort of planned air show...
Last one remind me of 9/11
It’s great.
So very well.
That A400M pilot got into trouble for that
There is not a airbus A400M in this video.
@@tasmith8296 what was that Globemaster?
@@George.Coleman yep that big B is for sure most definitely a c17 globemaster
@@tasmith8296 I'm ashamed
@@George.Coleman don’t be ashamed unless you where one of the poor souls tasked with working in or around a c17. the big difference that popped first for me was not being a prop.
Dang this is me playing a flight sim... realized
AVP 👽⚔️🐍
Sweet
Crazy Herkules and su 35
What's the name of the third one? i really wanna know.
I think we need to start making runways on water with strong safety measures of course but it would save a lot more loves wait no that wouldn't work either sorry
Very impressive! 🧐
The middle two are video games, ya’ll 🙄
Вторая посадка, игрушка.Фейк