SIGMA 85 f1.4 DG DN ART REVIEW vs SONY 85 f1.4 GM | DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- I'm GIVING AWAY A CAMERA VALUED UP TO $4,999!!! Enter the SUper HUGER Camera Giveaway right here bit.ly/megafro2020
This is a REVIEW of the SIGMA 85mm f1.4 DG DN lens for Sony E Mount Cameras. Not only do I review it, but I put it head to head against Sony's 85mm f1.4 G Master to see which one is better.
Download Sample RAW files here froknowsphoto....
Order this lens from Allen's Camera bit.ly/31x1Pu4
Nina’s Instagram ...
What I can tell you is this, the Sigma was so sharp when zoomed in 3:1 on our models eyes and the Sony was slightly not, that I thought I had a bad copy of the G Master. So, we called in another copy to verify our results....and the same results applied with the second lens. YES this SIGMA lens in my opinion is the better option.
NEW FroPack 2 Lightroom Presets
froknowsphoto.... (40% off)
Download MyGearVault mygearvault.co...
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
___________________________________________
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW Camera Bag bit.ly/2scQRt7
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts bit.ly/2vG2igB
My Go To Mirrorless Camera as of now
Sony a7R IV amzn.to/2PfcTaA
Sony a9 II amzn.to/2poUpdr
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►RUclips: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto #REVIEW #Sigma85ART
after watching this review, which would you go with and why?
I'll let you know after you review the 85mm RF Macro
Can you please critique my photos? I dm you on Instagram
sigma
If i want a 85 i will take this one. But i am between the sigma 85 1.4 and the sigma 105 1.4. Which one would you take?
I just wish they'd made one for the RF mount
Im so glad that Sony share their AF protocol, Tamron and Sigma lenses autofocus so well
They had to, RF lenses on canon are impressive
@SwitchRich I understand and agree. My point more over is they have encourage 3rd party lense manufacturers. RF lenses on Canon are really good. For Sony system to prosper they need diverse options
@SwitchRich thats bad. I am planning to get FF mirroless in that bracket
@SwitchRich it is, I own canon crop sensor cam and lenses.
Impressed by R6 hence I wanna wait till Sept if Sony can do a74 or if a5 is value for money. Cause RP is not that much.
@SwitchRich Agree, yes that's the plan.
One is decied to be 15/16-35 range, remaining under evaluation. Thank you
Jared: "As you can see, at 3:1, the Sigma is just coming out sharper"
Me watching at 144p: "IKR I can see it too"
10/10 comment sir! Bravo!
too relatable 😂😂😂😂😂
The Sigma seems to render warmer, sharper, and with a little more saturation too.
I agree with you
More contrast
Something definitely advanced in lens technology recently. Lenses coming out in the last 18 months are lighter and sharper than older optics. The recent Tamron 28-200, 70-180, and the Sony FE 20mm are all impressively sharp for their weight.
The Sigma outperforming the Sony at 2/3 the cost, just blows me away. Thanks for the video Jared.
Sony glass is uber expensive. They need to compete with 3rd party glass.
Yes, people, Sony is certainly paying this man to tell you that Sigma's cheaper lens is better than their equivalent 👌
You should take advice from real photographers. This guy doesn’t know how to take pictures.
@@creep4415 I am an award-winning pro of over 40+ years in the business and IMHO Jared is an excellent shooter. Lets see your work compared to his, or take a hike, ok. Your name fits you perfectly. lol
He is now out of Sony's payroll. He became a Canon's employee by now.
@@creep4415 He gives us the raw files too, so we can make our own decisions. He also showed us the AF speed and accuracy comparison. So maybe he should have shown other tests so we can see how it handles chromatic aberration, flare, LOCA, etc., but I'm pretty happy with what I've seen that there's no way I'm paying 600 bucks more for the G Master.
@@TheBigbangguy Not after that R5 overheating demonstration.
Idk why I'm watching so much photography gear video I can't even afford a body
It's not matter that you can afford it or not. Knowing more information is helping you everywhere.
@Darkertime2 I'm waiting for the a7IV (I'm more into video)
Hoping I'll have the money then to start investing in gear
I saved up for a solid 2 years to invest in my gear. Ain't no shame in that.
@@drblakeslovick4607 funny how everyone who says that (especially on RUclips) have over 20k $ of gear 😂
Ive been already take photos and videos for a long time with phones and cheap action cam
Because you can't risk missing the "L MOUNT ALLIANCE!!!"
I appreciate you putting the synopsis in your description. So many reviewers make you watch the whole thing just to get the 0:30 seconds I really wanted. But I watch your videos anyway because its much better than working
I own the 85mm f1.4 GM and love how it renders but its not razor sharp wide open. Sigma have essentially made the GM a non option for anyone in the market for an 85mm. It might even make some think twice about the f1.8 options too. Huge congrats to Sigma but I’m keeping my beloved GM :)
So if you'd now buy your first 85mm which one would you get?
@@sagaari why would you buy a heavier, more expensive, softer and larger lens?!
@@666Tomato666 brand identity. It's a GM. it's easier to brag about when you have it.
@@666Tomato666 Exactly my point
If I didn’t already own the GM I would by the Sigma definitely. Like when I bought their 24-70mm Art, there’s no way I was spending more on the GM for similar or in some aspects lower performance than the lens half the price.
For Sony to make the GM buyable again they’ll need to lower the price of the GM (not going to happen) or remake it into an 85mm f1.2 GM that’s sharper but keeps or even improves the already beautiful rendering of the current lens.
She's absolutely gorgeous. That helps too.
She is stunning
Jared is more than just a piece of meat guys. C'mon now.
with the sharpness?
The L Mount Alliance is Epic LoL
I agree that Sigma is beautiful.
Aside from the sharpness aspect, maybe I'm seeing things. Even though the settings are the same, I think the Sigma produced slightly warmer tones as well. To me, this is just as important in a portrait lens. Granted, you can color correct, but it's nice to get that result without taking the extra step. Am I imagining the difference?
You're not imaging it, I thought the exact same thing. It's actually dramatically better to my eye.
Totally agree and slightly more saturation as well
if you care so much about the colours, you should profile your lens and use the profile, then the slight differences in shades don't matter at all
@Gap I guess everyone missed the part where I said "you can color correct" But after a while, those minutes add up. All things being equal, the Sigma renders warmer tones which is what I like for a portrait lens. Is that all right?
Thanks for sharing. Great comparison.
Personally had similar experiences with the Sigma 85mm 1.4 and 35mm 1.4 for Canon. Those Sigma art lenses blow other lenses out of the water. They truly are top of the class when it comes to sharpness. Overall even prefer Sigma art over Sony or Canon lenses these days.
Sigma Art Series is ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS! Lots of manual focus room and quick & silent focusing. Great vid!
There is also Samyang aka Rokinon 85mm 1.4 for Sony-E and they claim it's new formula for mirrorless.
I have the Rokinon/Samyang, and I can confirm that it’s definitely a native lens.
@@JB_Hobbies I second that, and it is amazing at this price tag.
Yup. Weighs less and and costs half.
The Samyang/Rokinon 85 1.4 is a great lens. I have been using it since the day it came out. Focus is great for stills with the latest firmware. I love the warm rendering. The out of focus areas are smooth but look busier than the GM and the new Sigma. It is not a big deal unless you are really into that kind of shooting. It has 9 blades instead of 11 as the new Sigma. The Samyang is a great deal at $599.
@@DiegoTerzano The only thing that pushes me away from Samyang are reports from users that Samyang lenses tent to loose their sharpness over time. Either they are prone to damage more than all those sigma/sony tanks or they are just poorly constructed and it does not matter if users take care of them or not. Even Dustin's Abbot Samyang 85mm got worse overtime.
It also seems the colour rendition on the Sigma has slightly more saturation and is also warmer
Pro tip : If your model is moving every time they hear the shutter, just shoot in silent mode!
lmao... but electronic shutter gives you less bokeh
@@ramimxss why though
@@Collin1215 silent mode gives rolling shutter, I shot a wedding with it and I had so many unusable images...
I’d like to see a comparison to the Zeiss Batís 85 as well
Agreed many consider the Batis to be the one to go for.
I've worked with Nina before as well, she's a great model, wonderful person to work with.
6:43 Sharpness isn't something I've ever wanted in bokeh, and the edges on the lights looks better on the Sony for mine, but the CA difference is legit (athough at this point probably not noticable except when peeping). The Sigma definitely seems like the lens to choose all things considered though - especially the price!
It's refreshing to see someone who recognizes the practical, tactical and aesthetic qualities of cargo shorts.
Sigma bokeh has rather harsh edges, almost verging on the soap bubble effect. 🤔
yeah I don't like how Jared was going on about the sharpness of the bokeh like that was a good thing. Bokeh isn't meant to be sharp. It's distracting. It's really obvious at the examples at 14:36 how the sIgma bokeh balls are cat's eyeing and weirdly sharp, while the GM has a nice soft blurrier background, like a painting.
Different strokes for different folks. If you like sharp as hell bokeh go for it. It could be a stylistic choice for why you might prefer the sigma over the GM or vice versa.
I don't like chromatic aberrations on my bokeh edges either... so I'm still on sigma for this one.
10:32 "there are the only 2 options", there's also the Samyang 85mm f1.4.
The Sigma is sharper, but the Sony has a much better rendering, the problem is that the bokeh balls are sharper too, you want them look softer, look at 11:56, the "softer GM" photo actually looks a lot nicer, it has this "dreamy" look that the left photo doesn't have.
Sanyangs 85mm isn't that sharp at f1.4
BEWARE: There is a hairy dude in the raw files.
I like my portrait works to be soft and imperfect. I have the previous 85 art before but sold it because it’s too sharp for portraits and obviously heavy. There’s more to making a great photograph especially portraits and sharpness is not the deciding factor. But to each his own :)
Own the sigma 105, and totally agree! What your main portrait lens now?
You can always blur the photo in post, instead of paying $600 for it to happen in camera :) But you can't make a soft photo sharper in post... not really.
(1) Which lens has softer bokeh at f/1.4?
(2) Focus breathing? (true 85mm at closer distances?).
(3) How well does the Sigma focus in low light?
(4) Compare to the Samyang 85mm f/1.4 AF
(5) Compare sharpness in corners?
Thank you.
I can answer number 1: the GM has softer and more pleasing bokeh as the examples show
Jarrod Moore thank you for the Info. I Upgrade from Sony 85/1.8 and Need the lens with the best Bokeh and i have the feeling that it is the GM because Sigma is Designed more for Sharpness
Don’t even shoot mirrorless...watched any way...rewarded with a “L MOUNT ALLIANCE”...very nice.
L
M O U N T
A L L I A N C E !!!
Erilaz I WILL have that on a tee shirt or so help me...
Lens sharpness is of secondary importance in portrait photography. Colors, contrasts, visual art in general is the most important issue. Amazing girl :)
Amazing piece of glass by SIGMA, as always does, and correct price.
20:25 daaayyyom, when he zoomed in you could see the model contact lenses
Sigma and Sony aren't the only native FE 85mm f.4s. The Samyang 85mm f1.4 is. a great native FE mount lens for less than half the money of the Sigma.
Definitely the Sigma and not because it is less expensive, but because it is a better quality lens. The sharpness variance was obvious, the color rendition and background support were superb. Many thanks for another one of your comprehensive reviews. Way to go, FroKnowsPhoto Bro. :) Cheers, homeboy. Tony
Compare it to the Zeiss Batis 85mm
This doesn't surprise me. I found similar results after I purchased the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM and was left completely unimpressed, especially considering the price. Returned it and bought the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN and couldn't believe how much better it was. Instantly noticeable, even on the camera's screen. Plus I used the huge savings to buy the Sigma 14-24mm f2.8 DG DN, which might be one of my favorite lenses. Sigma is killing it with these DN lenses.
Great review! I like your "real world" review approach to reviews more than anything else in your videos, but for this lens, the studio detail shots were really helpful. Thanks!
Just bought my 85 sigma today and I'm going to use it on a shoe I'm so excited, thank you Jared for your excellent review.
My sigma just arrived. The pin cushion distortion is very noticeable. I know you fix it in post...but there goes the edge sharpness. Shooting anything with lines or cropping faces near the edge will be noticeable. I’m surprised you didn’t touch on this?
I put gaffers tape on my Sony’s [135] aperture ring to keep it locked down.
This video is absolutely the one that I was looking for, i gained a lot of information! Thank you so much Jared!
Plz do a test how the AF works in the video with a7s3. Is there any difference between Sony and Sigma E lenses. Lots of people want to buy a7s3 now and have a dilemma whether Sigma Emount or Sony Emount which is much more expensive.
I REALLY hope Sigma is able to get these out for RF soon. My 14-24 for Canon EF was an excellent, albeit HUGE, wide angle zoom-it was a poor match mounted on the EOS R. As a Canon user, I'm very jealous of the Sigma FF mirrorless lenses like the aforementioned 14-24 and this 85 1.4.
wait so, why don't you just get a FF camera?
I have the HSM version. I guess I have to carry that extra weight for all eternity. By the way, the original HSM version is also sharper than the GM, it was the reason why I bought it 2 years ago over the GM.
Oh man.... the "golden grams" (Grahams?) example/advert was the smoothest, best transition advertisement I've seen yet!
Organic lol.
Since the Sigma doesn’t seem to AF any better than the Sony GM (which is a bit disappointing in that regard), I think I might have to hold out for the Sony 85 1.2 GM 😉
I own a few art lenses including the magnetic 105 1.4 and love them. With that said, sharp bokeh is not a desirable thing. It becomes a distraction. I believe Sony intentionally kept that lense soft as it is more desirable for portraits.
Desperately waiting for the 70-200/2.8 DG DN. Until then, I’m “Sigma stalled.”
Im holding my 70-200 buy button allso, before sigma version comes 😅
Thanks for the test. The sigma was sharper. I did like the color tone of the Sony better. It would have been nice to see if there was a different in distortion. The model looked to be a slightly different size between the two pictures. She could have been at different distances. For sharpness, Sigma did a great job. More could have been tested like shooting against the sun and seeing any chromatic aberrations. Thanks for the test!
Love your work Jared! Yet again another very informative review 👏🏼 I’ve always been in favor of native glass. But man Jared & Sigma, you may have persuaded me! Amazing lens and that saving 😳 Good job Sigma!
Thanks for the provided files. Crazy how far Sigma has come!!!
Slower shutter speeds have more vibration, in-camera non stabalized vibration that can make the shot blury. The issue is not a focus issue at lower shutter speeds. It is the mechanical shutter having more vibration at lower shutter speeds.
Good comparison video Jared. To my eyes, the color also looks more natural/pleasing on the Sigma in many shots.
Have one coming tomorrow for my Leica SL. CAN'T WAIT!!! All I need now is NINA!!!
When is the real world review coming out of r6 ? Really curious!! Love from india 🇮🇳
Even I'm waiting for canon r5 review
Filming soon. Taking our time.
Okay brother thank u ❤️ 🙏
Props . That was an incredible review And you were actually funny this time. Excellent job FroBro
I’m about to get 70-200 f2.8 GM. Sigma please release the 70-200 f2.8 DG DN.
Best camera review channel on youtube
I wish there was more focus on rendering rather than how sharp lenses are. While sigma lenses are sharp the images produced are flat. There’s more to photography than pixel peeping. The drawing of an image overall should be what’s most important. No client zooms in 300% to see how sharp a microscopic detail is.
I cannot see how the images taken with the Sigma look "flat".
You want flat images if you're doing post production. You don't want a heavily saturated photo if you're shooting raw
@@BryanKeithPhoto What I mean by flatness is a sense of dimensionality to the rendering. Some people call it micro contrast or 3d pop. While post processing can enhance the dimensionality of a photo it's not something you can really create. It's down to lens design.
@@shang-hsienyang1284 to my eye Sigma lenses don't render with a sense of dimensionality. It's a very clinical look. Just my preference for aesthetics. Sigma does make great glass. For me personally, sigma lenses are more suited for landscape photography. For portraiture and street, I'd use zeiss, voigtlander, leica (way out of my price range lol), older Nikon, and good vintage glass. 7artisans, TTartisans and some other cheap Chinese lenses have tend to have that classical dimensional rendering as well.
654789qwe agree
I’m seeing a huge difference in skin tones. The Sigma seems to have a red color cast thing going on.
It's nice to see the aperture lock switch from the Nikon AF-D lens being implemented in these new lenses. Thanks Sigma!
After watching this review… I need some additional details in order to be able to make an *informed* decision:
- To what degree is this lens able to withstand the elements, especially compared to the Sony one?
- Is this lens compatible with the Lens Compensation functions [aberration corrections, taking care of vignetting, chromatic aberrations and distortions *in-camera!]* in the Sony cameras?
I would also keep in mind that while native lenses can be adjusted and updated while mounted on the camera, for the Sigma *the Sigma USB Dock is needed, which is a separate purchase - let alone that it is something extra to learn how to use and take care of!*
I wonder why *precious few, if anybody at all* ever mention anything of this in reviews - especially on RUclips!
Great video really appreciate the lengths you go to especially to get a 2nd Copy of the lens to exclude you having a dudd copy brilliant loving the sigma 50 mm1.4 art on the R6 👍👍
Love your reviews, super helpful. Love your style bro!
I'd be curious to see video performance with the sigma lens, and if it hunts at all while using video autofocus.
I am watching this video on a 27" monitor and when you zoomed in Nina's eyes I shouted a big WOW as tI could see those 61mp flexing their muscles! (In fairness I only shouted that WOW inside as it's past midnight and my neighbours wouldn't have been happy of that lol!)
I already pre-ordered the Sigma for the L MOUNT ALLIANCE!! Fast primes are lacking for my S1 right now and this one looks like a winner for sure. I like the size too.
In terms of focusing the GM85 is really dated. This becomes very apparent when compared to the GM24 or GM135. Those are the lens that the sigma’s focusing speed and accuracy should be compared to. I’m hoping Sony will refresh the 85 to current GM performance.
I was expecting Sigma to outperform the Sony, but I'm in awe that Sony's own lenses aren't extracting the most optimal AF performance. I would buy into the Sony system JUST for the wonderful Sigma glass that seemingly pairs so well with them.
Somehow, Jared forgot that there is a Rokinon 85 AF for Sony E-mount too.
You were comparing both lenses at 3 to 1, but at 3 to 1, the sony 1.8 is sharper than the 1.4 and it focuses faster.
The non G Sony 85, f1.8 is pretty amazing too, though.
Sharpness a little bit overhyped, especially for portraits.
i guess it depends on the aesthetics ypu're looking for, but yes i've had great portraits with both bery sharp lens and not so sharp lens
I don’t know which is more correct,.
At @ 11:50 and 12:04 you can see in the images that the Sigma makes the image look elongated,. Check the close up shot at 12:04
Another thing is,. Does Nina wear contact lenses,.? I thought I saw what looked like contacts on her eyes,.. maybe the contacts is confusing the eye AF and causing the glare,..
“Just a thought” maybe it happened with your contacts also...
And yes, the image from the Sigma, looks more pleasing to my eyes,. Or is it Nina lol 😂
That was a really nice photo of you Jared :-)
I have the gm and recently rented the sigma. Yes the sigma is sharper but the look of the bokeh on the Sony is more softer/nicer.
I find the swirly bokeh on the sigma distracting.
The sigma not only weighs less but it also feels well balanced on my a7r4.
Riiiiight. I didn't expect that at all.
I purchased the Viltrox 85 1.8 and am very pleased. I also have the Helios 40, which is 85 1.5.
This is the video I was waiting for all weekend!
Recently I sold all my Canon camera/lenses and then switched to Sony because there are not many RF lenses and all are very expensive. It was painful decision because I used Canon since EOS 5. Now I have 2 Sigma lenses, 35mm f2 and 85mm f1.4 dg dn, I really happy with them, 85 is my all day lens.
I was looking at 85mm lenses today and was searching for some videos on RUclips. And guess what I just found! Thank you
I LOVE when a model knows their shiza..
It's so welcoming.
Sniff test, wind tunnel, and "L MOUNT ALLIANCE" never get old.
Looking forward to more Critique videos
Sweet thanks Jared I'm going to get the Sigma version. 😏
Wow this Sigma lens is sick. Some many good 3rd party lens options today. Its a great time to be a photographer. Thanks for the video and sharing your awesome images.
Thank you for including the L MOUNT ALIANCE. My day is made🥰
Sigma definitely sharper wide open. But, boy does the bokeh look better on the GM
Wow you can actuallu tell she is wearing contacts in these photos as well. Now that is sharp!
I like that manufacturers are making lenses that are specifically for mirrorless. Look at how much smaller that Sigma is than the DSLR Sigma 85!
They are not the only 2 native, there is also the Samyang/Rokinon, and it's just amazing.
Do they auto focus ?
@@froknowsphoto Yep!
www.samyanglensglobal.com/en/product/product-view.php?seq=418
never had any problems with aperture rings accidentally change... why make such a big deal out of it
downloaded Zip one.. the lens is so good, it shows the models contact lenses
I'll keep my "old" Sigma 85mm 1.4 DG HSM. Great AF, sharpness, colors and: FREE BICEPS GAINS
I like everyone to see how big my lens is, so I love my original 85 art.
I just bought the Sony lens two weeks ago. I have shot about 90 pictures with it. I wish I saw this video earlier. I liked the dxomark review of this lens. The next lens I hope to purchase is the lensbaby velvet 56mm 1.6. But I enjoyed your review just the same. Keep up the good work!
I don't know why but when you said: "ME! It's a picture of me!" I just started laughing
Some people like sharper lens for portrait, and some people like soft lens for portrait. Personally, I like the softer one like Canon lenses ef 50mm f1.2 or ef 85 mm f1.2.
Nice comp vid...also found my new ring tone @7:42
What's really amazing, to me anyway: at 13:40 I could tell the Sigma was sharper than the GM while looking on my phone, BEFORE Jared zoomed in. I hope Sigma works similar magic with lenses for the RF mount!
Just do it!!! Love it. Great review also by the way. Oh did I mention. Just do it. Keep up the sterling work sir. 👍🏻
Jared, you said they are the only native Sony E mount 85/1.4. Did you forgot about the Samyang AF 85/1.4? It's amazing.
wow, super sharp! its even possible to see the model is on contacts