Luda Chris Puts His Opponent In HELL
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 фев 2024
- #highstakespoker #hustlercasino #pokerclips
Watch the entire episode here: • Luda Chris, JBoogs, Ni...
Subscribe if you enjoy the clips!
Link to Hustler Casino Live's Channel: / @hustlercasinolive
it's funny how Nick's first instincts are always right but he ends up doing the exact opposite every time haha
Yeah, like he starts this stream then decides to play in it?
🎣
I find him kinda douchey but I love listening to him analyze hands
He is a nit tho, so when ever he isn’t nutted he probably feels gross 😂
That’s why he’s the fish
The commentary on a lot of these videos are absolute legendary ! He has me in stitches telling the losing player to call 😁😆😄😅😃🤣😂
nick on every brodcast tells everyone to hurry up but when he tanks he gets on his podium and delivers a long speech analyzing the hand
I call it "The Losers Siliquae".
A lot of y'all don't get that pretty much everyone at this table would rather lose a bigger hand than get bluffed on these streams. Behind the scenes the players rib each other over every bluff and nobody wants to be that guy. If you lose a called pot though nobody rubs salt in the wound
The commentator is hilarious!! 🤣 😅
yessss wtfXDD
DGAF is so freakin funny. U r gonna love it after u call.
I love how DG is always looking for blood lmao
Phew. No creepy Nick massage.
Nick always gives a speech then a fk it call then loses his whole stack to Chris
Yup. He actually use to think that he owned luda, but that was variance.
Hilarious commentator lmao
DGAF might just be the funniest poker commentator EVER to commentate live poker!!
Nick V Luda is always good fun
yea nick always tanks, always makes the wrong decision always loses the most when he's behind and makes the least when he's ahead.
After DGAF's talk, "he has AJ", at the end, he should be saying, "of course he had the flush"!
I've always said 1 pair is an uncomfortable place
DGAF the goat
I love the narration on this
“You’re gonna love it after you call” 😂😂😂
I really hate when people give speeches and then do the opposite of the speech. Basically they want to hedge their decision and ensure they’re “right” about either the read or the call/fold. And if the call/fold is wrong then they at least get some goodwill (in their head) that they were a “thinking player.”
Spot on
Yep, exactly what Nick does every time. “Argh I nearly folded”. You were never folding.
This is the comment I was looking for.
This is why Luda goes on wild tilt when he runs bad, his default is run good so he's not used to it
Love Luda please post more of his plays, he's awesome 👍
the commentary freaking hilarious
Dgaf is the best. Great observations
Big John lookin like a character in a Tarantino movie
These gentlemen are fun to watch 😂
Always some big speech from Nick whenever he's in a tough spot.....just call or fold ffs !!!!😂😂😂😂😂
Commentator done me 😂 vs Nicks talk 😂
Old nick would have instant fold after feeling the vibrations in the cap
Speech call 😂😂😂😂
The triple vape pocket is crazy
All in would made great drama..😂
He needs to STOP thinking out load, STOP letting your opponent know what you have or fold or call with.
Nicks the best at winning the minimum and losing the maximum..
"He cheated, Ronnie😂"
Everytime Nick is in the hand I know I’m gonna have to skip a good 3-4mins everytime
I’d love to see the life time record of Nick against Luda.
Dgafs commentary is legendary
You gonna love it after you call
You got this Nick
Its not that dumb
Nice call Nick
Oh, hes got a flush!
😅😅😅
I hate to say it but the last few hands with Nick have been entertaining AND his reads have been spot on....GAWD I hate to like him.
Who is this announcer? He’s my favorite lol
Ive never seen someone make such good reads then just go with the complete opposite of their read like Nitucci its crazy guy makes some sick reads then just says fck it
Everyone is capable of making the reads and figuring the story out if they have played for long enough, the truly skilled players are able to act on those reads
Trust ur instinct.
Nick said it at 6:44 he could have anything.
Did anyone believe for even a second that Nick was actually gonna make the correct decision on the river? He's nothing if not consistent.
DGAF is the best lmao
What is the point of sitting there and guessing a million different hands your opponent might have? Nick has no clue what his opponent has. It is a complete waste of everyone's time.
how does he freaking hit every time?
why the hell is this camera so close 0:03 ???????????
Nick is a great player in paying off other players. His normal session is losing 5 digits. Anything less is abnormal.
Chris is playing chess, rest are playing checkers
Huh? In that first hand he got the chips in way behind and went runner runner for a flush. That’s not playing chess, it’s dumb luck.
@@Sam-db4mrit was 1:2 how is that way behind lmao
@@antisan Bro Luda had 25% equity against Ronnie on the flop. How is that 1:2? Your math skills are suspect 🤣🤣🤣
@@Sam-db4mr 1:3 is not that bad. I didnt watch the video carefully since i was on a plane but it’s not uncommon for him to win here at all
@@antisan 25% is luck. Plain and simple. And of course it’s not uncommon to lose as a 3:1 favorite. Still a suck out though and winning that hand was all luck. Luda knew damn well he wasn’t ahead there. But he’s more of a gambler than an actual poker player.
“No one talks himself out of a decision and then does the opposite” like Nitucci. Has zero self-confidence. Nitucci doesn’t like Nitucci.
And as for DGAF, whispering into Nitucci’s ear the whole time? Best poker commentator on the internet. Hilarious.
I almost folded, I call ✌️
Nick is the best whale-watching on RUclips.
I like Nick's speeches. Good fun.
Still, I think you gotta call in those spots against Chris. The man is much too much.
Why does nick think he’s got to talk every time because you are not a poker player you just rich that it you are not Garrett and will never be
Little girl crying. Thinks he gotta win every hand
Little girl prefer arm wrestling
Luda Chris is winning a lot lately, I'm very suspicious about him
In the old days the decision to call, fold, or raise is already made before the card is turned. Then a guy like nick analyzes his decision for 5 minutes outloud trying to impress everybody with his analytical skills. And he still tanked it. The old days nick would get planted with the cactus.
I always had it lol
Bring Greg back lol
Ronnie runs the worst on this show no doubt I’ve never seen him win a hand
How does a nit like Ronnie get invited?
Luda Chris is a bad poker player for real because if didn’t get lucky he will be broken all the time because he calls every time behind
Just how bad is Nitucci
it's actually really hard to be as tight as him and as bad as him.
Every time I see Luda plays he wins with crapy hands he gets lucky 80% of the time makes me think he is cheating or hired by the casino
Luda is all luck no skill
GG scammer
속으로생각해라 ㅋㅋ 뭐맞는게없노 ㅋㅋ
I believe the person commentating even plays in these games sometimes but how in the hell can you call the nut flush draw so badly? Nick did NOT have the nut flush draw. Luda obviously had the nut flush draw for a straight flush if the six of clubs would have came. The commentator said that Nick had the nut flush draw twice. It was one thing to miss it the first time but then they missed it the second time. I don't get what's so difficult. You can see the cards on the screen just like we can see and I can tell basically instantaneously that Nick did not have the nut flush draw. I don't get why you commentators miss that so much. Stop calling things the nuts when it's not the nuts.
hey genius, Nick had the nut flush draw!
@@dgafpokerplayer5773 are you really that stupid? There was a seven of clubs, four clubs, and a five of clubs on the board and Luda had the 8 of clubs in his hand along with the Jack of clubs. Obviously, if the six of clubs comes then Ludacris makes a straight flush. That Ace of clubs wouldn't mean Jack shit in that case. So, NO (genius), Nick did NOT have the nut flush draw. Just stop already. You're making yourself look foolish. If you can't understand the basics of poker, then don't comment and don't be commenting in the videos either. It's ridiculous to try to argue with somebody that isn't going to understand facts. If you want to argue that the 6 of clubs was already shown that somebody else had folded, that doesn't matter. In the hand itself, if you take away what cards we can see, then Ludacris had the not flush draw plain and simple. Just because we can see the cards that people are folding doesn't mean that you call something else the nuts. In a standard hand, the nuts would be just that regardless of whatever cards we can see that were folded on screen. Again, just stop. You're being ridiculous here.
Wtf are you talking about? Technically, using your logic, anyone with a pair after the flop is drawing to the nuts then. He said "nut flush" draw, not drawing to "the nuts".
@@zachmeyerscom Are you really that dumb that you can't figure it out? Do you know the hands in poker or not. If you don't then I suggest that you go and look at the poker hands so you understand their Rank and how they are formed. Just because you have a pair on the Flop doesn't mean you're going to have the nuts. But, you said that the person claimed that they had the nut flush draw and not the nuts. Well, what the hell do you think the straight flush is in this case? It is both the nuts and the nut flush draw. So, go comment somewhere else if you don't know what the hell you're talking about which is obvious here. This has nothing to do with having a pair on the Flop and then talking about having the nuts. In this particular hand, Luda had the nut flush draw and it would have been the straight flush draw so the commentator didn't know what the hell they were talking about. Again, it's ridiculous because they even play in the game and they can't figure out what the nut flush draw is or the nuts. It doesn't matter if you're calling it the nuts or the nut flush draw. They are one in the same in this situation. Also, I don't know why my comment responding to dgaf poker player 5773 got deleted but for whatever reason it did. Basically, I told dgaf poker player 5773 that they were an idiot if they can't figure out the most basic things in poker and that Luda had the nut flush draw because he had the straight flush draw with the six of clubs if it would have came. Not that hard to figure out. Just stop calling things the nuts when they aren't going to be the nuts. But, in this case, even the not flush draw that the commentator tried to claim Nick had was completely wrong. No, Nick did not have the nut flush draw. Luda had the not flush draw because he was drawing to a straight flush which would have been the nut flush and the nuts. I don't know why you guys can't figure this out. It's not that difficult.