@@abdelerahmanekhaldi6228 alpha zero is far weaker than stockfish and has been for a long time. Only people who know nothing about engines think it's the best.
@@narayasuiryoku1397 yeah because you can't defeat a bot that have calculated thousands of possibilities ahead before you..... But yeah, the ones dropped down for humans so that they commit one bad moves after some moves can be defeated......
I like to watch engines play against each other. Standard opening. Completely understandable. Then immediately they start crazy maneuvering in the middle game where i cant get the gist of any move. And after the simplifucation we get to the very easy endgame. Feels like reading only prologue and epilogue in a big novel. 😁
@@DrKlinkist Magnus Carlsen is 3200 rated I think And there are bots like AlphaZero that are so powerful that it's hard to estimate the rating, because there's nothing that can really compare to it. AlphaZero played Stockfish and won with 1/10th of the time that Stockfish had.
Being called a bot in other games - Rude, makes fun of your lack of skill Being called a bot in Chess - You are an all seeing god who holds reality in the palm of your hand
Fact: Stock fish took all the pawns to take reveng the horrible things max engine bot has done to us. Like bruh I lost to the max engine bot with 99 accuracy.
I think those moves were relatively intuitive. The moves that's always hard to understand are the quiet ones like Ra7 followed by h6 and then Kh6 before finally doubling the rooks on the h file. That kind of sequence is what's unreal.
At first I thought despite the elo difference, because the exchange ruy is super safe for white, game might be drawn but stockfish kept all the pieces and then played the position really well.
El problema con maximun de chesscom es que solo "hace las mejores jugadas" (entre comillas porque tambien comete errores) y stockfish es más de calcular, hacer planes y eso, aparte que puede hacer movimientos brillantes.
Some of the moves seem really weird but you can pin point why all of them are good. Especially the knight movement to first undouble the pawns so it can later clear space for it's queen
In TCEC chess ( engine world championships ) engine is declared lost if evaluation reaches +10 or -10. I expected it here too.There is no reason to play positions what even human beginner can easily win. For example 2:19 . Why play it on if even 1200 player can easily win it as black ? But of course you have to programm engine when to resign . If you dont, they play until checkmate or draw . Human grandmasters even dont need +10 to resign. Human vs human games they often resign with evaluation +4 or + 5 and almost never need +10 to realize this is lost . For example Duda resigned against Mamedyarov in Wjik aan Zee when evaluation was +5
@@stagna1959 why would you make a machine resing? its satisfaying to see how they do the chekmate. resigning is for weak humans who dont wanna waste their intelligence in more lines, as a machine it is not a problem, until it reaches a high scale
@@andreyyka135 indeed hikaru is a mind blowing chess grandmaster but stockfish is more rated than hikaru and magnus you can see 3700 elo so it's impossible to beat it. Even its impossible for almost all players to reach 3000 rapid rating cuz we are humans thats it
Must be nice being stockfish. Imagine if there was a person whose as good as stockfish in chess. He can literally challenge anyone in the planet and never loose a game
Nah they just kept a closed position, which is a relatively normal way to play. What i don't understand is whatever the fuck those tactics in the midgame were. Bot stuff i suppose.
if stockfish 13 and 14 always wins as black, imagine how fast they would win with white Edit: I have caused a war in the replies Haven’t read them all but I’m getting the popcorn
what I can say for sure is that you have impeccable music taste! I was surprised to find this banger in a youtube video (one of my most favorite songs)
I think just about any human would have ended the game with qc7 qe7# (or alternatively qe7 qc7#). I find it hilarious that the computer casually plays a pawn move recognizing that it's a m2 no matter what white does
1:11 pawn was goin c.4 but did endup at c.3. Was that just an error of recording tool or a bot's fault? Cus i've seen same "teleportation" in some different video with use of probably the same bot.
@@LVicentini how can you say so if you haven’t seen matches between Stockfish 14.1 and Alphazero, the ones alphazero won was against Stockfish 8. This stockfish is much stronger than Alphazero. Alphazero has never played against this modern Stockfish.
it is winning but what black played wins quicker. qh1 forces queens off and black only has one passed pawn. so black has to move king in also to win which takes a couple extra moves.
Just to think that any non perfect move is always losing because stockfish makes the best moves, so even if you played mostly perfect, 1 excellent move instead of perfect is gonna make you lose
I know next to nothing about chess, but towards the end I was wondering how it would conclude. If the losing bot would forfeit, make a move it knew would lose, or not make a move at all because it knew it would lose. Like that old Tetris AI that paused the game when it knew it couldn't do anything. Super interesting!
it is called "en passamt". Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3. You can now capture on b2. and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
Shannon’s number gives a low bound for the number of possible chess games around 10^120. There have only been ~10^18 seconds since the Big Bang, and if you imagined every possible move being played in the smallest possible time (10^-44 seconds), this means that as of now only 10^62 chess games would have been played out, meaning you would have to wait another ~10^60 seconds for all games to be played through. At this stage in the universe, we think dark energy will have driven every single proton in the universe light years apart, to where the only thing left that we recognize today would be black holes, evaporating very slowly due to Hawking radiation. You can show that even the most massive black holes today will have evaporated after ~10^80 years, meaning you would still have some black holes left at this time. However, more accurate estimates show even 10^120 is an extreme underestimate of the number of games possible, with the actual number being around 10^3700 if the 50 move rule is invoked. So, it is safe to say you would have to wait until the universe is Googol’s of times larger than it is now and having cooled to 0K with literally nothing left in it (on any type of remotely possible measurable distance scale) before you had any chance of beating the computer at chess.
Can someone explain 1:10 - 1:11 pawns? The white pawn moved from C2 to C4, and then the black pawn kills the white pawn by moving from D4 to C3. I'm by NO means an expert but I'm pretty sure they attack a piece on the same square.
That move that you are describing is called en passant. It is a valid move that is also the only time a pawn is allowed to capture an opposing pawn without having to capture on the same square as the, again, opposing pawn, but rather one square up from it.
it is called "en passamt". Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3. You can now capture on b2. and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
Amazing. I'm not a grandmaster but it's clear that isolating the dark square bishop and making it utterly useless was how Stockfish slowly gained the advantage.
I don't get it, in 2:09, This looks like black queen can catch white queen at no cost but bot move pawn instead of queen. Why does bot didn't move queen? or maybe I'm wrong?
If black take the queen. The white pawn can still capture it. But its still wining for black though because the bishop can easily capture the pass pawn. as you can see engines can see millions of possible move and they always find the fastest way to checkmate their enemies and according to stockfish h5 move is much faster rather than Qh1.
I know I’m extremely late to the party. But man! Excellent work. I’m just now starting to get back into chess. It’s a great game. My dad taught me how to play years ago. And he even had a chance to play the great Bobby Fischer but was unable to as time ran out before my dad had a chance to play him. Anyway! I’ve subscribed to your channel as I’m looking to elevate my game!
N'to - La Clé Des Champs This song is very similar to (N'to Trauma - Worakls Remix) I couldn't use it because it has a copyright I guess, that's sad but still very good music.
I'm out here with my petty 780 or so point, holding them dearly to my chest as i stare in distress and fear as two cold, unfeeling machines battle each other to death in a beautiful game of chess
it is called "en passamt". Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3. You can now capture on b2. and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
It’s funny because the higher the level the easier it seems to predict the moves since everything is positioned so well from the start it’s actually easier idk… of course to get to a really good position like that and then find how to start is extremely difficult
@@jorgeherrera1074 It's "en passant" I think (not em). Only people who have deep knowledge of chess seems to know this. I also got to know this only today.
At higher levels though... each point of rating difference means more. Comparing a 100 rating playing a 500 rating, with say a 2300 playing a 2700 GM is totally different. You'd expect the two lower rated players to make random moves and mistakes, where at the top levels a lot of theory and stuff and experience a GM has can make a huge defining difference.
@@IIIIIIIIIIIIIIPKIIIIIIIIIIIIII Still the same chance to win though in both scenarios. But yes going from 3200 to 3750 is way more impressive than going from 700 to 1250.;
it is called "en passamt". Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3. You can now capture on b2. and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
Main principle of chess: 1. Always move with support or create support (after enemy eats some unit, the other will eat that enemy as a revenge) 2. Try to defend all troops at all cost, only eat when really can’t defense. 3. Always trade: e.g. queens kills queens, to simplify the game -> the real game of skills starts when there’s only kings and pawns remains. *we can discuss if the correction is needed.*
Only trade when winning to simplify the position. Never trade when losing to keep as many opportunities for the opponent to blunder as possible. This is when playing humans. Against bots it don't matter what you do.
@@adamwoolston253 i was thinking that it could be a win for black too. even if the game was designed for equality, maybe the result is the perfect first answer from blacks that is always defending perfectly whatever whites do. or whites has only ONE perfect opening move. that means: blacks haves 20 possible perfects answers, whites only haves 1 perfect move. that means 20/1 in odds blacks are winning until it is proven to be wrong
The first couple of moves were standard for any chess game. Then they did a weird dance, moving their pieces back and forth. Then came the unexpected trade-off of the rooks. I guess they both realized they don't need the rooks to win. And then Stockfish found a way to maneuver its bishops around to get an edge. And then pawn promotion to queen and finally a few moves to checkmate.
i dont really know why stockfish didn´t do this on min 2:09; last move being Kf3, black had Qh1+, Ke4/Kg4 idk, for example, then, Qxd5, xd5, Bd6 and thats completely winning, i mean, theres no moves you could do
New version out! ❤
ruclips.net/video/DquKm-mWYB4/видео.html
bots in other games: weak, slow, predictable
bots in chess:
-prepare your anus
Have you played those "other games"? There are insane bots in TF
@@demiandesu Generally bots are weak dont f*ck around
@@demiandesu bots on fps is terrible
@@bingkoiE TBF bots in FPS are always intentionally terrible.
I mean it's really easy to give the bots aimbot, but it's just no fun.
Chek bots in dota. 2020 World champ team was destroyed so easy.
Stockfish: Moves anything
Also Stockfish:
*"Ah, an excellent move"*
Stockfish: wow I'm amazing.
Pats itself on the back*
"It's not easy being the best"
Obama meme
@@pronoobie5780 alpha zero enters the room
@@abdelerahmanekhaldi6228 alpha zero is far weaker than stockfish and has been for a long time. Only people who know nothing about engines think it's the best.
I'm proud to say I understood and predicted every move in this game
We have a genius among us🥳
Amgosu sususususussdy impsitor
Guy's rating is 3751
cap
Ok now you’re just playing with us
Chess noobs: when do I start beating the chess bots
Super Grandmasters: that's the neat part, you don't.
wait, so we can't defeat bots? I'm a chess noob, still learning a lot and I'm trying to beat a bot level by level. So is that impossible?
@@hikarii53 not all of them but the strongest ones have out of this world's skills
If computer engines were around back when chess was being developed, we humans would have never bothered picking up this game.
@@narayasuiryoku1397 yeah because you can't defeat a bot that have calculated thousands of possibilities ahead before you..... But yeah, the ones dropped down for humans so that they commit one bad moves after some moves can be defeated......
Best you can do against perfect moves is a draw if you had infinite time
Stockfish won the moment it played en passant. Even chess itself stood no chance.
You see en passant, you have to do it, its a rule stockfish proves to be right.
Only Garry Chess himself can defeat Stockfish now.
I'm sad i have never experienced en passant
r/Chessanarchy
@@lucasdelhove1568 you mean anarchychess?
Dude..This stockfish is just out of this world..every move is just a perfection..
Alphazero moment
Until alphazero come 😂
@@yashrajrana4332 stockfish 14 is the best at the moment
@@yashrajrana4332 Alphazero is already defeated few years ago
How to use stockfish
I like to watch engines play against each other. Standard opening. Completely understandable. Then immediately they start crazy maneuvering in the middle game where i cant get the gist of any move. And after the simplifucation we get to the very easy endgame.
Feels like reading only prologue and epilogue in a big novel. 😁
So true
yep, same feeling here
Прочитал перевод - думаю интересная мысль, и написано как будто по-русски
А потом ник прочитал и всё понял))
Yeah imma be honest i have no idea what the fuck happened in the midgame either.
@@JaguaroID Yeah that's a good idea youtube had
Goes to show how high the ceiling really is. You can be 3200 and still have an opponent rated 550 points higher.
Can you be 3200 tho, really? I know they say shoot for the stars but..
@@DrKlinkist Magnus Carlsen is 3200 rated I think
And there are bots like AlphaZero that are so powerful that it's hard to estimate the rating, because there's nothing that can really compare to it. AlphaZero played Stockfish and won with 1/10th of the time that Stockfish had.
@@DrKlinkist in FIDE: theoretically. In practice who knows? Maybe there's rating inflation if more people will play.
@@DrKlinkist but in lichess Magnus did already reach like 3300 or something
@@Fufolium I am pretty sure Stockfish has already long surpassed AlphaZero.
Being called a bot in other games - Rude, makes fun of your lack of skill
Being called a bot in Chess - You are an all seeing god who holds reality in the palm of your hand
Being called hot is never rude
@@savageraccoon787 he probably meant bot
att: a bot
Untill Martin join the game.
@@OnlySkeepwish Martin was MY daddy 🥵🍆💦
The skill level in this game is absolutely inhuman
No shit sherlock
Magnus
Well...
So did u read the title or..
Literally
This stockfish player should go for the Grand Master title he's playing really good but he needs to improve his tactics
@@Ubaidullah_yt thank you for informing us, keep it up! Good day sir!
@@Ubaidullah_yt He was being ironic.
@@Ubaidullah_yt no shit Sherlock
@@Ubaidullah_yt HAHAHHA holy fuck
@@Ubaidullah_yt Sir, This is the wendys
Fact: Stock fish took all the pawns to take reveng the horrible things max engine bot has done to us.
Like bruh I lost to the max engine bot with 99 accuracy.
I highly doubt u got a 99 accuracy and lost
@@adamfine9228 think was saying SF got 99 accuracy
@@groundedgaming hopefully
I lost to max bot with queen and 2 rook odds... yeah....
@@AmazonRainforest715 gosh, how?
Those backwards moves from stock fish were unreal
Yeah anyone have any idea why stockfish did those moves?
@@clairobisset7105 Repositioning. It wanted the two pieces elsewhere and had time to give up two tempi.
I think those moves were relatively intuitive. The moves that's always hard to understand are the quiet ones like Ra7 followed by h6 and then Kh6 before finally doubling the rooks on the h file. That kind of sequence is what's unreal.
@@gm2407 ayo wtf I just learned that the plural of "tempo" is "tempi" XDD
@@robertnagy3942 We have latin to thank for a lot of suffixes.
The difference :
Maximum 25 makes the best moves
But Stockfish makes BRILLIANT moves
...the best moves are the best moves
isnt brilliant a move the bot hasnt thought of
@@ME0WMERE best move according to the engine itself... It can turn out to be a blunder when analysed by a stronger engine
@@ME0WMERE nah that means the only winning move which will prove useful a little later
@@zenosama3172 which does? The best move or the 'brilliant' move?
3750 - 3200 = 550 this is me
3750-3200=150 this is me🤯
3750-3200=50 this is me🤯
3750-3200=5 this is me 🤯
3750- 3200=3 this is me 🤯
3750-3200=1 this is me 🤯
the pawn sacrifice into the bishop for knight sacrifice to win the piece 5 moves later by stockfish. just mindblowing
Stockfish 14 is literally op
@@gholamalikohi6675 pretty sure stockfish 14 is better actually
@@gholamalikohi6675 stockfish 14 is stronger
@@gholamalikohi6675 Stockfish is much, much better than AlphaZero. AlphaZero beat Stockfish 8. This is Stockfish 14.
@@gholamalikohi6675 The AlphaZero equivalent today is Leela Zero, which is really good, but stockfish 14 is a little better.
But the game style of alphazero is amazing. Sacrificing pieces for better pieces and movement with does pieces. But yes I know Stockfish 14 is better.
At first I thought despite the elo difference, because the exchange ruy is super safe for white, game might be drawn but stockfish kept all the pieces and then played the position really well.
El problema con maximun de chesscom es que solo "hace las mejores jugadas" (entre comillas porque tambien comete errores) y stockfish es más de calcular, hacer planes y eso, aparte que puede hacer movimientos brillantes.
At the end not queen c7 but f5 for style points 👌
я думаю stockfish просматривает в первую очередь ходы за пешки в первую очередь, а ходы за ферзя почти в последнюю
@@Name-zu4nj true
In my opinion at the end Qc8# is better than Qe7#
Coz f5 makes your position better, by moving pawn up... That's computer logic :)
Because queen c7 isn’t checkmate. It moved the pawn to stall for one move so the king could move to a scare to be mated.
that stock fish guy is really talented he should go to official tournaments
we have Hans for that 👌
😂😂
in the form of beads
Well it does thanks to hans😂
@@wolvenspud6844 oof !!! 😂
Still thinking about the en passant by stock fish…
Some of the moves seem really weird but you can pin point why all of them are good. Especially the knight movement to first undouble the pawns so it can later clear space for it's queen
This game was amazing. Last move being a Zugzwang and an En Passant at the middle of the game was just chef's kiss
these two move is insane
0:57
1:40
Ikr like no humans gonna make that kind of move
1:40 is a simple clearance sac
It would be interesting if the one who loses resignes at the last move after he calculates that he is without options
In TCEC chess ( engine world championships ) engine is declared lost if evaluation reaches +10 or -10. I expected it here too.There is no reason to play positions what even human beginner can easily win. For example 2:19 . Why play it on if even 1200 player can easily win it as black ?
But of course you have to programm engine when to resign . If you dont, they play until checkmate or draw . Human grandmasters even dont need +10 to resign. Human vs human games they often resign with evaluation +4 or + 5 and almost never need +10 to realize this is lost . For example Duda resigned against Mamedyarov in Wjik aan Zee when evaluation was +5
@@stagna1959 why would you make a machine resing? its satisfaying to see how they do the chekmate. resigning is for weak humans who dont wanna waste their intelligence in more lines, as a machine it is not a problem, until it reaches a high scale
@@skallittor5478 Fr it would be exhilarating how bots checkmate their opponent bot so we could learn from it
1:12 That white pawn on c4 just went to the backrooms.
I was able to predict 6 of stockfish’s moves, in that regard I’m proud
Book moves?
@@wedsonsantos3967 I don’t study theory
@@N2O_The1000thElement aight.
It's Scary to realize that no human can be this good ever.
Hikaru Nakamura?)))
@@andreyyka135 indeed hikaru is a mind blowing chess grandmaster but stockfish is more rated than hikaru and magnus you can see 3700 elo so it's impossible to beat it. Even its impossible for almost all players to reach 3000 rapid rating cuz we are humans thats it
It's about calculation! And sure the computer will win in this ! But for human being it's about intelligence and creativity @@Huzaifarehman877
@@Huzaifarehman877I think I can beat it I beat almost every chess player in my class,it played many silly moves
@@jackblack-ir5om What..... So do you have a stronger Engine?
Must be nice being stockfish. Imagine if there was a person whose as good as stockfish in chess. He can literally challenge anyone in the planet and never loose a game
I like how they didn't attack each other pieces at the start, which is the opposite of what humans do.
I would do the same.
I learn very quickly.
It's pointless to attack at first if it is a needless sacrifice.
That’s literally what all the top players to never attack until you develop your pieces
Nah they just kept a closed position, which is a relatively normal way to play. What i don't understand is whatever the fuck those tactics in the midgame were. Bot stuff i suppose.
@@joda7697 you cover potential territory while defending your own pieces, it's the same concept as stratego
@@SomeKata I'm not dumb, i know _that_ concept, i just couldn't comprehend the purpose if the specific moves we saw.
if stockfish 13 and 14 always wins as black, imagine how fast they would win with white
Edit: I have caused a war in the replies
Haven’t read them all but I’m getting the popcorn
*it
@@niccolopaganini1782 shut up
@@niccolopaganini1782 “13 and 14” - it?
@@bobuxdupe no hes saying "they" should be "It"
@@bidilz technically, but I really can't find anyone who asked. Prolly even dora with her map can't find who asked
great music choice, fell in love instantly. THANK YOU!
what I can say for sure is that you have impeccable music taste! I was surprised to find this banger in a youtube video (one of my most favorite songs)
A timeless masterpiece
When I write Thank you so much, it just seems to be a sentence.
But I really mean it. Thanks a lot.
@@Xenonity What’s the song called?
@@Hitman-889 check description
1:44 it is so scary that it can use queen and bishop so fluidly and effective...
I think just about any human would have ended the game with qc7 qe7# (or alternatively qe7 qc7#). I find it hilarious that the computer casually plays a pawn move recognizing that it's a m2 no matter what white does
yo what the hell why baf here lmao
I just loved that c4. Dude, this is another level even for another level.
timestamp?
@@valinorean4816 1:39
@@spiderjerusalem Why was the move so good? I don't have the best understanding of chess.
@@dhaumya23gango75 It wasn't *that* good, a human could have seen it. The benefit was that it blocked the queen moving south.
Isn't that the cause of b pawn loss after 12 moves?
“Our battle will be legendary.”
1:10 perfect move
I have no idea what is going on
@@alixr7304 probably the en passant
@@Piece_Of_Clay no I get that I just meant the game has so much going and it's so high level idk what's a good move or not XD
@@alixr7304 ah I see
1:11 pawn was goin c.4 but did endup at c.3. Was that just an error of recording tool or a bot's fault? Cus i've seen same "teleportation" in some different video with use of probably the same bot.
that move is called “En Passant.” 🤗
@@XenonityBruh, i've never know that was a thing. Well my bad then.
The fact that a 3700 will lose against a 4000 shows that there are moves which the stockfish assumed to be best which in reality are not
Really cool seeing the difference between excellence and perfection
1:11 how did the pawn move like that
google en passant
What happened to the piece C2 at 1:11 ?
En Passant rule
2:35 why not d7?
u tryna say u smart than stockfish 14 lmao?
Qd4
It was fascinating to watch these monstrous powers battle it out.
thank you for timing the song with the moves
1:44 I'm a beginner at chess and i saw B3 pawn move and wondering if it's a good move or not. Rating is 370 something. I'm dying to know.
Excellent but not of much value
Im 1200 btw
This Stockfish is on another level of chess...
And gets beaten like a little bitch to alphazero
@@LVicentini how can you say so if you haven’t seen matches between Stockfish 14.1 and Alphazero, the ones alphazero won was against Stockfish 8. This stockfish is much stronger than Alphazero. Alphazero has never played against this modern Stockfish.
2:10 could someone explain me why didnt stockfish move its black queen on h1? top rightmosr corner, it seems to me like the best move
it is winning but what black played wins quicker.
qh1 forces queens off and black only has one passed pawn.
so black has to move king in also to win which takes a couple extra moves.
@@adamx-yc3tu i seee, thanks
How did blacks pawn beat the white pawn at 1:10???
LOL
Just to think that any non perfect move is always losing because stockfish makes the best moves, so even if you played mostly perfect, 1 excellent move instead of perfect is gonna make you lose
I know next to nothing about chess, but towards the end I was wondering how it would conclude. If the losing bot would forfeit, make a move it knew would lose, or not make a move at all because it knew it would lose. Like that old Tetris AI that paused the game when it knew it couldn't do anything. Super interesting!
Bots in other games: *gets bullied*
Bots in chess:
why didnt stockfish play Qa1 for a skewer at 2:09
Someone can explain me how black can take C3 at 1:11 ?
it is called "en passamt".
Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3.
You can now capture on b2.
and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
technically if you played perfectly random moves every game for long enough, you'd beat stockfish 14
The heat death of the universe would likely occur before you win.
@@magnusultor3724 I don't mind, as long as my will carries on into eternity
I laughed but it seems to be true. :D
@@Xenonity yep, this is mathematically true
Shannon’s number gives a low bound for the number of possible chess games around 10^120. There have only been ~10^18 seconds since the Big Bang, and if you imagined every possible move being played in the smallest possible time (10^-44 seconds), this means that as of now only 10^62 chess games would have been played out, meaning you would have to wait another ~10^60 seconds for all games to be played through.
At this stage in the universe, we think dark energy will have driven every single proton in the universe light years apart, to where the only thing left that we recognize today would be black holes, evaporating very slowly due to Hawking radiation. You can show that even the most massive black holes today will have evaporated after ~10^80 years, meaning you would still have some black holes left at this time.
However, more accurate estimates show even 10^120 is an extreme underestimate of the number of games possible, with the actual number being around 10^3700 if the 50 move rule is invoked.
So, it is safe to say you would have to wait until the universe is Googol’s of times larger than it is now and having cooled to 0K with literally nothing left in it (on any type of remotely possible measurable distance scale) before you had any chance of beating the computer at chess.
it was satisfying when the moves synced with the music
that wasn't a 'little-bit' of a difference in ability; that was a huge amount of difference.
Can someone explain 1:10 - 1:11 pawns? The white pawn moved from C2 to C4, and then the black pawn kills the white pawn by moving from D4 to C3. I'm by NO means an expert but I'm pretty sure they attack a piece on the same square.
That move that you are describing is called en passant. It is a valid move that is also the only time a pawn is allowed to capture an opposing pawn without having to capture on the same square as the, again, opposing pawn, but rather one square up from it.
Google en passant
How is dxc3 at 1:13 possible? The pawn already passed right?
en passant rule
it is called "en passamt".
Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3.
You can now capture on b2.
and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
Amazing. I'm not a grandmaster but it's clear that isolating the dark square bishop and making it utterly useless was how Stockfish slowly gained the advantage.
no.
@@pm-every-skne I don't have a bugatti
He didn't need it so he just decided to flex
Stockfish avoided taking the brick by playing en passant. good job stockfish
when the revolution comes, brother, all the engines are gonna take bricks
It's so fascinating to watch. It's truly beautiful.
I don't get it, in 2:09, This looks like black queen can catch white queen at no cost but bot move pawn instead of queen. Why does bot didn't move queen? or maybe I'm wrong?
If black take the queen. The white pawn can still capture it. But its still wining for black though because the bishop can easily capture the pass pawn. as you can see engines can see millions of possible move and they always find the fastest way to checkmate their enemies and according to stockfish h5 move is much faster rather than Qh1.
I know I’m extremely late to the party. But man! Excellent work. I’m just now starting to get back into chess. It’s a great game. My dad taught me how to play years ago. And he even had a chance to play the great Bobby Fischer but was unable to as time ran out before my dad had a chance to play him. Anyway! I’ve subscribed to your channel as I’m looking to elevate my game!
This has nothing to do with the game but do you know any other songs of this type?, if so i would love if you could tell me the names
N'to - La Clé Des Champs
This song is very similar to (N'to Trauma - Worakls Remix)
I couldn't use it because it has a copyright I guess, that's sad but still very good music.
Try desert house playlists
Darude - Sandstorm
@@maalikserebryakov peak comedy right there
@@maalikserebryakov Comedy gold
1:32 sneaky queen. whites didnt realize that was a backstab attempt on that bishop
what do you mean?
@@vibovitold the queen low-key pined the bishop
In x years artificial intelligence is like, why were humans so bad at this game? 😂
u mean like right now
they bots not ai
to explain what happened at 1:12 , Black(stockfish 14) did a "en passent" which is a legal move
1:13 how the pawn disappear in e4?
Holy hell
En passant
I'm out here with my petty 780 or so point, holding them dearly to my chest as i stare in distress and fear as two cold, unfeeling machines battle each other to death in a beautiful game of chess
it is simply absurd to think how much computing power these MAN-MADE engines have, it’s almost scary
I watch this often before going to sleep. The music is good to hear.
Help where did the white piece on 1:12 go? It just vanished? :D
En passant
1:11 what happened to whites pawn? moved 2 spaces but black somehow took?
its called an en passant
it is called "en passamt".
Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3.
You can now capture on b2.
and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
It’s funny because the higher the level the easier it seems to predict the moves since everything is positioned so well from the start it’s actually easier idk… of course to get to a really good position like that and then find how to start is extremely difficult
Duuuude, YT recomendations gave me second ur video. Woah. mesmerizing. like. subscribe. from Siberia with love
Thank you
wait this was only 3 mins it felt like a whole war documantry while watching it.
Was it a glitch at 1:12 or did the engine capture a piece it couldn’t? It captured a pawn that was a square out of capture zone.
@Irritated Skeleton yes
@@jorgeherrera1074It's something called em passant
@@dhaumya23gango75 oh wow! I didn’t know you could do that! Thanks!
@@jorgeherrera1074 It's "en passant" I think (not em). Only people who have deep knowledge of chess seems to know this. I also got to know this only today.
bro but it was obvious that stockfish was going to win. It is literally a 550 rating difference. It would be a 700 playing 1250
Yeah we all know that, I was just curious about if Stockfish 14 going to play any different than Stockfish 13.
At higher levels though... each point of rating difference means more. Comparing a 100 rating playing a 500 rating, with say a 2300 playing a 2700 GM is totally different. You'd expect the two lower rated players to make random moves and mistakes, where at the top levels a lot of theory and stuff and experience a GM has can make a huge defining difference.
@@IIIIIIIIIIIIIIPKIIIIIIIIIIIIII Still the same chance to win though in both scenarios. But yes going from 3200 to 3750 is way more impressive than going from 700 to 1250.;
@@blackstream2572 no
@@lucass1536 yes
Ok, even as a kid I knew about en passant. There are so many people that dont know about it..
as a 400 rated rapid chess player, i have absolutely no idea what they are trying.
edit: dam i never thought my comment would be so big
As a 1400 rated rapid player, I still do not get it.
As a 1800 I can't figure it too
as a 2500 i can't also
As a 0 rated non chess player
I have no flipping clue
as a 200 rated classic chess player,
how the f* does knight move?!?!?
1:10 Anyone notice black pawn moves to e3 but kills white pawn which was in e4 ????
en passant
@@chief7573 had no idea this rule existed lol. Ty for mention
it is called "en passamt".
Basically imagine u have a pawn on c3 and ur opponent plays their pawns first move on b3.
You can now capture on b2.
and you can only do this after the pawn moved beside you, not any move afterwards
What is happening at 1:12? How is that white pawn taken
It's called
@@abcde8320 En passant
taking on the pass (rule)
When your playing the king along diagonals you know it ain't no joke
So satisfying to see the computer that makes you feel stupid loosing so badly in this game
0:57 This move is not anymore strategy but occultism.
Didn't understand what happened to the Pawn at 1:12 at C4
En passant
have a question.
minute 2:34
why don´t move "d6" to "d7"?
d7 loses on spot.
qe4 checkmate.
The stockfish guy plays very well.
Wow endgame perfection!!
Main principle of chess:
1. Always move with support or create support (after enemy eats some unit, the other will eat that enemy as a revenge)
2. Try to defend all troops at all cost, only eat when really can’t defense.
3. Always trade: e.g. queens kills queens, to simplify the game -> the real game of skills starts when there’s only kings and pawns remains.
*we can discuss if the correction is needed.*
"Always trade" lol
bro where you find these principles?
@@lukewagner158 in his right ossicles
These are stupid
Only trade when winning to simplify the position. Never trade when losing to keep as many opportunities for the opponent to blunder as possible. This is when playing humans. Against bots it don't matter what you do.
2:10 why didnt stockfish go Qh1? can pls someone for the love of god explain?
white would have a passed pawn that would be hard to stop
1:11 Where did the white pawn go?
en passant
1:10 what?
I like how they spend 70% of the game making these tiny positional moves.
And then the murders begin.
I wonder if chess engines will ever reach the upper limit of possible skill, where when played against each other they will always end in a draw
Maybe we’ll finally resolve the debate as to whether chess played perfectly on both sides is a draw or a win for white
@@adamwoolston253 i was thinking that it could be a win for black too.
even if the game was designed for equality, maybe the result is the perfect first answer from blacks that is always defending perfectly whatever whites do.
or whites has only ONE perfect opening move.
that means: blacks haves 20 possible perfects answers, whites only haves 1 perfect move.
that means 20/1 in odds blacks are winning until it is proven to be wrong
Black odds: 20x20
White odds: 20.
High-level engines usually will end their matches in a draw, that’s why engine competitions have them using wacky openings to allow for a win or loss
The first couple of moves were standard for any chess game. Then they did a weird dance, moving their pieces back and forth. Then came the unexpected trade-off of the rooks. I guess they both realized they don't need the rooks to win. And then Stockfish found a way to maneuver its bishops around to get an edge. And then pawn promotion to queen and finally a few moves to checkmate.
i dont really know why stockfish didn´t do this on min 2:09; last move being Kf3, black had Qh1+, Ke4/Kg4 idk, for example, then, Qxd5, xd5, Bd6 and thats completely winning, i mean, theres no moves you could do
well, i advanced the video n now i see the reason, mouth shut, stockfish pls forgive me
lol no, you can ask anything that's why there is a comment section.
But I don't know about the Stockfish forgiving you. :D jk.
@@Xenonity jahajajahajaj