Respecting Integrity & Conscience - John Corvino
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- John Corvino explains that respecting people’s convictions doesn’t require sanctioning their discriminatory behavior.
Dr. John Corvino is a writer, speaker, and philosophy professor at Wayne State University in Detroit. He has written several books for Oxford University Press, including, most recently, Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (with counterpoint by Ryan T. Anderson and Sherif Girgis).
Find the book here: amzn.to/2ozZABp
Video by Chase Whiteside. Read more at JohnCorvino.com.
Your "What's Morally Wrong with Homosexuality?" video made me stop hating myself for who i really am! Really glad you are back :)
I love that video. Even though I haven't fully come out yet - I'm more accepting of myself now.
You're back -- hooray! :-)
(Also, first.)
Hearing you speak at Baylor University last night with Matthew Lee Anderson was thought provoking and extremely interesting. I thoroughly enjoy your videos and hearing your insight!
That ending got me, cheeky.
PLANET JOHN
Correct !❤
You`re good!
As same-sex couples are different from opposite sex couples I fail to see how there can be discrimination. And where does the homosexual community get the right to force people of faith to violate their religious beliefs , which your side assured everyone wouldn't happen?
Of course, rational people understand that same-sex couples are not different from heterosexuals in their need for services. You might as well whine that it's okay to deny black couples a marriage license because you believe they are not equal to white couples, and therefore you personally fail to understand the discrimination.
Your personal failure has no bearing on the reality.
dumb argument. there are no differences between the races while there are profound differences between the two genders. same-sex unions are not and never will be marriage. we are playing with fire folks.
Rebecca, your personal, crippling issues do not reflect or define reality.
Rather than throw around insults why not answer the question: where in the constitution does it say homosexuals can redefine marriage?
Of course, you are falsely assuming that Christians' self-serving reinterpretation of marriage (one man and one woman) is the original concept of the institution. Same-sex marriage existed long before straight religious zealots decided tore classify marriage to benefit themelves and only themselves. So gay people are not "redefining" marriage, they are merely reclaiming it.
Actually if someone doesn't wanna marry a black person they shouldn't have to John. In principle