After using MBPs for years, I realized that 1)I don't need the portability and a cheap Win machine or tablet covers that for me, 2) I can't work on a small screen (anything under 27 is small now), and 3) I wasn't using the laptop keyboard anyway because I always plugged in extended keyboard and (non-Apple!) mouse. The MacStudio makes so much more sense for my workflows than any MBP.
In the same boat. The base model is more than enough for me. But I’ve owned a MacBook since 2010 so all I know is portability. Last year I used the MacBook the LEAST I ever have since buying an intel iMac. So part of me thinks I won’t need the portability. The other part of me knows I frequently traveled before COVID…. So… 😭
I was looking at the MBP then realized that every laptop that I have ever owned (2) has been used in clamshell mode connected to a 37" or larger monitor or TV. I went with the studio.
That's what is so great about the 14" MBP for many people. It strikes a balance and does it all in one device for many people. Similar performance to the 16" model in same basic form factor as the previous 13".
@@DrewAllegre No doubt it comes down to how much work you do on the fly. I spend 90% of my time at the desk so prefer to have an optimized desktop setup and am willing to suffer a little more when on the road. Trying to configure a workstation around a laptop -- no matter how powerful -- is an exercise in compromise IMO.
Same. I want the most power I can afford on the desk, and a light cheap portable as a ‘nice to have’ extra option for the occasional bit of work on the go at a pinch.
I agree. I’ve been an MBP guy for years and it’s docked on my desk 90% of the time. When I do take it out I’d just be using it for light stuff like web browsing and research. Sometimes I forget that I’m also paying extra for the portability, the nice display and keyboard. And I don’t think I’m making my money’s worth on these features. I might go for the base Mac Studio and base MacBook Air to cover any portable work.
Trading in my M1 Mac mini for an M1 Max Mac Studio. The order should be arriving in early April. The M1 Mac mini is nice, but not enough power for me and I don't even do video/photo editing or any gaming on it. Yes, it's fast and silent, but 16GB of RAM severely limits me and I consider myself a casual user.
I'm quite torn between... I feel I absolutely do NOT need the processing power of the M1 max, however, I am tired of being short of ports like already with my current 2017 iMac 5k, and the constant need to unplug, replug, something that would be even worse with an M1 Mac Mini. So for getting a computer that can last for 5 years, probably even longer, an M1max + 32GB + 1 or 2GB of SSD with studio display and the generous number of ports that both come with is probably a better solution than a minimalist Mac Mini or even a Macbook Air M1.
I know someone who works in 2 offices and his house. He has a monitor in each location and he just takes his Mac Mini wherever he goes. He will love the Studio.
The Mac Studio is a power user's desktop machine. The M1Max MacBook Pro's are power user machines for road warriors and those who value portability. Any machine with an M1Max or M1Ultra is going to be meant for people who will use all that computing power to make real money. Those machines are built to pay for themselves, but only if you have work that can use them to generate revenue. For those who are not constantly editing video (or sound, or animation, or CAD) in industrial workflows, and M1Pro might be more than enough power for the money. If you're doing other office tasks on a daily basis and only occasionally working with video/sound/animation/CAD, an M1Pro machine is much more reasonable. The big question becomes: will the M2 bridge the gap between the M1 and the M1Pro? Will we see an M1Pro Mac Mini or 24-inch iMac? Or will we see an M2 in these machines that makes them better "prosumer" machines? Apple hasn't really responded yet to bridge that gap for the "prosumer" space. If an M1 MacBook Air, Mac Mini, iMac or 13-inch MacBook Pro isn't enough power for you, but the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro's are too big of a leap, Apple still has a big, gaping hole in its market to fill there. Will M2 releases fill this hole? We'll have to wait and see...
I use my MBP Max mostly as a desktop. I'm curious to see the performance gains of the Ultra over the Max. Maybe, I might consider it instead of the MPB if they are impressive.
They locked down the chips in the studio not to. Out perform the laptop even thou it has tons of thermal headroom, that apple for you. They are holding back the studio it could have 50 % more performance easy.
The M1 Max chips in the Studio will be able to run at higher wattages giving higher performance due to the significantly better cooling. The M1 Ultra will be on a whole other level.
On the charts Apple showed M1 Max is using 15 Wats more power than the Macbook because of the extra cooling so there should be a noticeable difference in performance. Bit like the 2020 Air to the 2020 Macbook pro
Thank you for your channel, always interesting and informing to see your videos. Regarding the question you ask, then I'm planning to get a MacBook Pro 16" with the 32GB GPU Core, 2Tb disk and max out the Unified Memory, that is up to 64GB. However, if the project I'm start working on goes well, then I will probably get a MacStudio, maxed out except for the HD (2TB there also). With it I will get at least two 4K displays. I´m not sure if I will chose the Studio display, especially if I can get the same quality for half the price elsewhere.
I bought the last of the 13" MacBook Pro 4-port Intel machines in 2020. Too early to upgrade and frankly it still does the job. I'll wait till next year and see what the M-2 MacBook Pros bring. This Apple Silicon transition is turning out to be quite a game changer. Though I don't expect to be a customer, at least not an early adopter, I'm quite intrigued with what they do with their VR Headset.
I'm in no hurry to order but maybe towards the end of the year, have to wait for more music software to become Monterey compatible and M1 compatible. One thing I need to check into is another discussion on the new Mini Studio storage options was say the Apple prices have dropped. That the cost of Apple's internal storage is inline with the cost of similar external SSD storage. If that is true then I'll go for Apples internal storage for better throughput and less desktop cable clutter.
I was planning to get a base model 16" but i don't give a damn about the Mini-LED display. so i'll get a Mac Studio base model and i'll pair it with a 1440P 144 Hz HDR display
Great review thanks. Just one obvious question. In the hierarchy of M1 processors, is the Max better and higher than the Pro. Or is the Pro better and higher. It does seem clear that the Max is the better one, but traditionally the Pro has always been the top end one - hence the doubt.
I have a MacBook Air with M1 that I LOVE! I also have a 27" iMac with intel that is awesome but have been thinking of the MacBook Pro to replace everything. maybe I'll just get the Mac studio to replace my iMac and a nice monitor that isn't expensive....or a nice LED tv to connect it to. I will never spend that money on an apple monitor.
The new MBPs are amazing but I’m a big screen desk guy all the way. That gorgeous laptop screen would be wasted on me. The base Mac Studio tho gives me a massive power upgrade at a fairly modest investment. Maybe get an M2 MacBook whenever that comes out, but no rush.
Just ordered a base ultra for my son and me doing movie and music projects plus digital art and photography, will keep my 14” m1 pro 2nd tier for travel and lounge/sofa use but the m1 mini is to be sold
I would like to get some suggestions for mac studio: Which one is better, 1. getting 1 TB SSD rather than the 500+GB base SSD 2. getting the 500+GB base SSD then get an external HDD like QNAP TR-002. The cost of 1 TB SSD is similar to an external HDD 6TB seagate so I wonder if more internal SSD can affect the speed and performance of the device or its just for storage purposes?
depends on the speed of the storage you need. The 6tb will be incredibly slow compared to the 500 SSD that the mac comes equipped with. If you're just storing sheer files and photos you'll be ok! But video files and large projects you should steer clear of those drives, you'll want a faster speed for those things.
MacBook air refurbished and Mac Studio for the same price as the MacBook pro, just as fast one for home one for the road light no fan just as fast for most things at home all the ports you need just as fast or faster cool and quiet. Two for the price of one. What's not to like. Win Win.
Dammit every time I watch this channel late at night your HDR videos blind me on my Mini LED iPad Pro, lol. I’m holding out for M3 Max 14” MBP which will probably be as fast as the M1 Ultra since it will be shrunk on the 3nm process and cost half as much. My Intel Macs should last that long. 128GB RAM and 8TB SSD will be cheaper by then and it will last me forever. They’ll probably ditch the notch by then and have the cutout like the iPhone 14 Pro is rumored to have.
Making the jump from the Microsoft world to the Mac ecosystem. I loved this video and was exactly what I was looking for! I have decided to go with maxed out 14" Macbook Pro w/1TB instead of the new Mac Studio. I get the best of both worlds with more power than I could ever think of using. Now I just need to figure out the path of least resistance for the transition and understand any possible challenges that may exist if any. Wish me luck on this new endeavor!
Switched in 2005 and never looked back Macs last for many years, working flawlessly day in and day out. The iMac 5K retina 27" is my favorite, along with a 16" MBP for mobility.
I’m holding out for a 24 inch Apple Studio Display, ideally with the same 4.5K resolution as the year-old 24 inch iMac. But I’d settle for 4K if the price were significantly under $1,000. My 16 inch M1 Pro MBP is all I truly NEED right now, but I might be tempted to finally replace my 2006-vintage Mac mini with an M1 Pro or M2 Pro model if the price were right. But that would fall into the category of want not need, so price would be a real consideration.
They will definitely not be releasing that. The only other rumored display is a 27" mini-LED, Pro-Motion display in between the Studio Display and XDR display.
@@doompod Yeah. I came to that same conclusion and gave in and purchased the 27 “ Studio Display. I LOVE it and am now glad I didn't have a 24” option.
Well, both make compelling propositions. That said, unless one really needs the Ultra perf, the macbook is a wiser option, and then some usb-c displays from dell / that studio display to top that 'workstation' groove. The portability of the macbook will win the majority of people. 🥰 to see you more and more 😊😊
I was really hoping for a higher end iMac with the M1 Max in one package instead of having to spend $4,000 for Mac Studio and the display with no accessories. I have a maxed out M1 Max MacBook Pro but want a bigger external display but $1600 is steep, perhaps I should wait a bit longer ton see what happens next...
I thought the update to Mac min was coming and what I was focused on, now I am really thinking about the Mac Studio. I have a 2016 MacBook Pro 16, they I DJ and take with me at times, which a iPad Pro would suit what I am doing. I do more in the home office. So Mac Studio. What could they now offer in the Mac mini going forward that I should wait, nothing more than the Mac Studio could offer I believe.
I am definitely interested in the Mac Studio BUT, as a musician I will hold off for a very long time until the Music business has caught up to Apple. Some music apps are barely able to support Big Sur and so Monterey is a Nono until these plug-in manufacturers pull their fingers out and get developing….
I have a 16-inch Macbook Pro with M1Pro and 16 GB/1TB. I'm going for a MacStudio with M1Max, 32GB and 2TB. I have a 32-inch BenQ 4k monitor, so see no reason to buy that overpriced monitor. I prefer desktops to laptops when not traveling, so this MacStudio hits the sweet spot, I think. I do think 32 GB is better for me even though I can make do with 16GB most of the time. I do love the display and sound on the Macbook Pro, so I look forward to traveling with it. I also have a M1 Mac Mini but I'm going to sell it off. I have several Windows PCs (and laptops) too but I will keep them until they die. They likely won't get replaced, either.
Given all the comments they threw at the realease event, the Mac Pro is in the works, it's bound to use an even more performant variant of the M1 family, thus Mac Studio's performance crown may be short-lived... And that thing needs to be released first for the M1 family migration completion in terms of the products stack. So I'd venture we might see Ultra Pro ;) this summer or autumn, before Apple decides to revitalise the lower end of the spectrum again. They might need to do this in order to gain all the pro-sumers on-board before those users decide to switch to Zen3/Zen3+/Zen3-3D ThrearipperPro and AdlerLake/SapphireRapids HEDT product stacks... as such, Studio might be just an appetizer, a pretty expensive one at that. At least Macbook Pro gives you power/performance in a moblie format factor, thus making it better choice. Had the Studio been priced lower, the story would've been different, but with Ultra costing roughly close to 10x the base M1 Mini, I'm wondering whether a compute cluster built out of such 10 machines wouldn't be better for the workloads Ultra-powered Studio is supposed to tackle "alone".
The Mac Studio is nice but I already have a 14" MacBook Pro with M1 Pro chip which handles anything I can throw at it with ease. I also have a 2019 27" iMac which is fully maxed out and is certainly no slouch. So, as nice as the new toys are, I guess I won't be buying a Mac Studio at this time.
I ordered the Apple Studio M1 Max 32 core, with 32GB ram and 1TB sd plus the Studio display, w/tilt only. I couldn't justify the 20 core 48/65 core Max or the height adjustment on display. I wanted 64gb memory too but delivery date would of pushed to end of June for Studio and Adjustable display.
After using MBPs for years, I realized that 1)I don't need the portability and a cheap Win machine or tablet covers that for me, 2) I can't work on a small screen (anything under 27 is small now), and 3) I wasn't using the laptop keyboard anyway because I always plugged in extended keyboard and (non-Apple!) mouse. The MacStudio makes so much more sense for my workflows than any MBP.
this is an interesting point of view by the way
In the same boat. The base model is more than enough for me. But I’ve owned a MacBook since 2010 so all I know is portability. Last year I used the MacBook the LEAST I ever have since buying an intel iMac. So part of me thinks I won’t need the portability. The other part of me knows I frequently traveled before COVID…. So… 😭
This is actually my point of view as well ... Thanks for saving me the keystrokes ...
I was looking at the MBP then realized that every laptop that I have ever owned (2) has been used in clamshell mode connected to a 37" or larger monitor or TV. I went with the studio.
For me, an appropriately configured Mac Studio and base Macbook Air is the ideal setup. A heavy/large MBP is worst of all worlds.
That's what is so great about the 14" MBP for many people. It strikes a balance and does it all in one device for many people. Similar performance to the 16" model in same basic form factor as the previous 13".
@@DrewAllegre No doubt it comes down to how much work you do on the fly. I spend 90% of my time at the desk so prefer to have an optimized desktop setup and am willing to suffer a little more when on the road. Trying to configure a workstation around a laptop -- no matter how powerful -- is an exercise in compromise IMO.
Same. I want the most power I can afford on the desk, and a light cheap portable as a ‘nice to have’ extra option for the occasional bit of work on the go at a pinch.
I agree. I’ve been an MBP guy for years and it’s docked on my desk 90% of the time. When I do take it out I’d just be using it for light stuff like web browsing and research.
Sometimes I forget that I’m also paying extra for the portability, the nice display and keyboard. And I don’t think I’m making my money’s worth on these features.
I might go for the base Mac Studio and base MacBook Air to cover any portable work.
Trading in my M1 Mac mini for an M1 Max Mac Studio. The order should be arriving in early April. The M1 Mac mini is nice, but not enough power for me and I don't even do video/photo editing or any gaming on it. Yes, it's fast and silent, but 16GB of RAM severely limits me and I consider myself a casual user.
I'm quite torn between... I feel I absolutely do NOT need the processing power of the M1 max, however, I am tired of being short of ports like already with my current 2017 iMac 5k, and the constant need to unplug, replug, something that would be even worse with an M1 Mac Mini. So for getting a computer that can last for 5 years, probably even longer, an M1max + 32GB + 1 or 2GB of SSD with studio display and the generous number of ports that both come with is probably a better solution than a minimalist Mac Mini or even a Macbook Air M1.
Gotta say, Miles and Dave2D are two of the highest quality reviewers out there... solid reviews, opinions and video crafting...
I know someone who works in 2 offices and his house. He has a monitor in each location and he just takes his Mac Mini wherever he goes. He will love the Studio.
I'm hoping for a Mac mini with a Pro chipset.
Same here. With the HDMI 2.1 port.
I was disappointed that it wasn't included in the March event.
I am curious if the thermal freedom in the Mac Studio is enough to gain a significant performance advantage from the laptop.
The Mac Studio Ultra has a two pound copper heat sink.
@@tonyburzio4107 Was talking about the M1 Max config
The Mac Studio is a power user's desktop machine. The M1Max MacBook Pro's are power user machines for road warriors and those who value portability. Any machine with an M1Max or M1Ultra is going to be meant for people who will use all that computing power to make real money. Those machines are built to pay for themselves, but only if you have work that can use them to generate revenue. For those who are not constantly editing video (or sound, or animation, or CAD) in industrial workflows, and M1Pro might be more than enough power for the money. If you're doing other office tasks on a daily basis and only occasionally working with video/sound/animation/CAD, an M1Pro machine is much more reasonable. The big question becomes: will the M2 bridge the gap between the M1 and the M1Pro? Will we see an M1Pro Mac Mini or 24-inch iMac? Or will we see an M2 in these machines that makes them better "prosumer" machines? Apple hasn't really responded yet to bridge that gap for the "prosumer" space. If an M1 MacBook Air, Mac Mini, iMac or 13-inch MacBook Pro isn't enough power for you, but the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro's are too big of a leap, Apple still has a big, gaping hole in its market to fill there. Will M2 releases fill this hole? We'll have to wait and see...
I use my MBP Max mostly as a desktop. I'm curious to see the performance gains of the Ultra over the Max. Maybe, I might consider it instead of the MPB if they are impressive.
They locked down the chips in the studio not to. Out perform the laptop even thou it has tons of thermal headroom, that apple for you.
They are holding back the studio it could have 50 % more performance easy.
Great review and descriptions Miles 👏👏👏
love the Mac Studio and Studio Display......but not the price....
something i think is missing from these deep dives is that creatives that use macs heads just exploded with ideas
The M1 Max chips in the Studio will be able to run at higher wattages giving higher performance due to the significantly better cooling. The M1 Ultra will be on a whole other level.
On the charts Apple showed M1 Max is using 15 Wats more power than the Macbook because of the extra cooling so there should be a noticeable difference in performance. Bit like the 2020 Air to the 2020 Macbook pro
Thank you for your channel, always interesting and informing to see your videos. Regarding the question you ask, then I'm planning to get a MacBook Pro 16" with the 32GB GPU Core, 2Tb disk and max out the Unified Memory, that is up to 64GB. However, if the project I'm start working on goes well, then I will probably get a MacStudio, maxed out except for the HD (2TB there also). With it I will get at least two 4K displays. I´m not sure if I will chose the Studio display, especially if I can get the same quality for half the price elsewhere.
LG Ultrafine 24 seems good. I have 2 of them, work perfect
I bought the last of the 13" MacBook Pro 4-port Intel machines in 2020. Too early to upgrade and frankly it still does the job. I'll wait till next year and see what the M-2 MacBook Pros bring. This Apple Silicon transition is turning out to be quite a game changer. Though I don't expect to be a customer, at least not an early adopter, I'm quite intrigued with what they do with their VR Headset.
I'm in no hurry to order but maybe towards the end of the year, have to wait for more music software to become Monterey compatible and M1 compatible. One thing I need to check into is another discussion on the new Mini Studio storage options was say the Apple prices have dropped. That the cost of Apple's internal storage is inline with the cost of similar external SSD storage. If that is true then I'll go for Apples internal storage for better throughput and less desktop cable clutter.
I was planning to get a base model 16" but i don't give a damn about the Mini-LED display. so i'll get a Mac Studio base model and i'll pair it with a 1440P 144 Hz HDR display
you're going for the max or the ultra?
@@ceqell Max the base model of the mac studio
a laptop is not only about display. this isnt really comparable, unless you leave your laptop at a fixed location.
@@truthseeker6804 i Know but i can't afford the M1 Max MBP
@@ahmedunbreakable ok, then cool choice.
Please compare the baseline studio with the similar priced m1 pro macbook
MacBook Pro M1 max, all the way every day. It’s a laptop and also can be used as a desktop
Great review thanks. Just one obvious question. In the hierarchy of M1 processors, is the Max better and higher than the Pro. Or is the Pro better and higher. It does seem clear that the Max is the better one, but traditionally the Pro has always been the top end one - hence the doubt.
I have a MacBook Air with M1 that I LOVE! I also have a 27" iMac with intel that is awesome but have been thinking of the MacBook Pro to replace everything. maybe I'll just get the Mac studio to replace my iMac and a nice monitor that isn't expensive....or a nice LED tv to connect it to. I will never spend that money on an apple monitor.
The new MBPs are amazing but I’m a big screen desk guy all the way. That gorgeous laptop screen would be wasted on me. The base Mac Studio tho gives me a massive power upgrade at a fairly modest investment. Maybe get an M2 MacBook whenever that comes out, but no rush.
Just ordered a base ultra for my son and me doing movie and music projects plus digital art and photography, will keep my 14” m1 pro 2nd tier for travel and lounge/sofa use but the m1 mini is to be sold
Anyone else wish Apple would bring back the crazy thin 12inch MacBook with an M2 processor? The air isn't an ultra compact anymore.
Actually picked up a cheap 8gb ram 2015 Air on ebay for this reason. Seems the new Air will have a smaller form factor, hopefully close to the 12!
I would like to get some suggestions for mac studio:
Which one is better,
1. getting 1 TB SSD rather than the 500+GB base SSD
2. getting the 500+GB base SSD then get an external HDD like QNAP TR-002.
The cost of 1 TB SSD is similar to an external HDD 6TB seagate so I wonder if more internal SSD can affect the speed and performance of the device or its just for storage purposes?
depends on the speed of the storage you need. The 6tb will be incredibly slow compared to the 500 SSD that the mac comes equipped with. If you're just storing sheer files and photos you'll be ok! But video files and large projects you should steer clear of those drives, you'll want a faster speed for those things.
is 64 and 128 G of ram real ?
Upgrading my M1 Mac mini to mac Studio! Already upgraded more core i9 to M1 max MacBook Pro!
MacBook air refurbished and Mac Studio for the same price as the MacBook pro, just as fast one for home one for the road light no fan just as fast for most things at home all the ports you need just as fast or faster cool and quiet.
Two for the price of one.
What's not to like.
Win Win.
Dammit every time I watch this channel late at night your HDR videos blind me on my Mini LED iPad Pro, lol.
I’m holding out for M3 Max 14” MBP which will probably be as fast as the M1 Ultra since it will be shrunk on the 3nm process and cost half as much. My Intel Macs should last that long. 128GB RAM and 8TB SSD will be cheaper by then and it will last me forever. They’ll probably ditch the notch by then and have the cutout like the iPhone 14 Pro is rumored to have.
Making the jump from the Microsoft world to the Mac ecosystem. I loved this video and was exactly what I was looking for! I have decided to go with maxed out 14" Macbook Pro w/1TB instead of the new Mac Studio. I get the best of both worlds with more power than I could ever think of using. Now I just need to figure out the path of least resistance for the transition and understand any possible challenges that may exist if any. Wish me luck on this new endeavor!
Switched in 2005 and never looked back
Macs last for many years, working flawlessly day in and day out. The iMac 5K retina 27" is my favorite, along with a 16" MBP for mobility.
I’m holding out for a 24 inch Apple Studio Display, ideally with the same 4.5K resolution as the year-old 24 inch iMac. But I’d settle for 4K if the price were significantly under $1,000. My 16 inch M1 Pro MBP is all I truly NEED right now, but I might be tempted to finally replace my 2006-vintage Mac mini with an M1 Pro or M2 Pro model if the price were right. But that would fall into the category of want not need, so price would be a real consideration.
They will definitely not be releasing that. The only other rumored display is a 27" mini-LED, Pro-Motion display in between the Studio Display and XDR display.
@@doompod Yeah. I came to that same conclusion and gave in and purchased the 27 “ Studio Display. I LOVE it and am now glad I didn't have a 24” option.
Why this video is not HDR?
Well, both make compelling propositions. That said, unless one really needs the Ultra perf, the macbook is a wiser option, and then some usb-c displays from dell / that studio display to top that 'workstation' groove. The portability of the macbook will win the majority of people.
🥰 to see you more and more 😊😊
On of my favorite faces on 9to5mac 🔥🔥🔥 the event was incredible. Mac studio looks flame.
I was really hoping for a higher end iMac with the M1 Max in one package instead of having to spend $4,000 for Mac Studio and the display with no accessories. I have a maxed out M1 Max MacBook Pro but want a bigger external display but $1600 is steep, perhaps I should wait a bit longer ton see what happens next...
Just get one or more non-Apple external monitors. Apple's displays are stupid excessive and really not necessary for a pro workflow.
I thought the update to Mac min was coming and what I was focused on, now I am really thinking about the Mac Studio. I have a 2016 MacBook Pro 16, they I DJ and take with me at times, which a iPad Pro would suit what I am doing. I do more in the home office. So Mac Studio. What could they now offer in the Mac mini going forward that I should wait, nothing more than the Mac Studio could offer I believe.
My Base Studio with 1 Terabyte is on its way!🔥
I am definitely interested in the Mac Studio BUT, as a musician I will hold off for a very long time until the Music business has caught up to Apple.
Some music apps are barely able to support Big Sur and so Monterey is a Nono until these plug-in manufacturers pull their fingers out and get developing….
I have a 16-inch Macbook Pro with M1Pro and 16 GB/1TB. I'm going for a MacStudio with M1Max, 32GB and 2TB. I have a 32-inch BenQ 4k monitor, so see no reason to buy that overpriced monitor. I prefer desktops to laptops when not traveling, so this MacStudio hits the sweet spot, I think. I do think 32 GB is better for me even though I can make do with 16GB most of the time. I do love the display and sound on the Macbook Pro, so I look forward to traveling with it. I also have a M1 Mac Mini but I'm going to sell it off. I have several Windows PCs (and laptops) too but I will keep them until they die. They likely won't get replaced, either.
Portland, JAMAICA in The Building !!!!!!!!
Given all the comments they threw at the realease event, the Mac Pro is in the works, it's bound to use an even more performant variant of the M1 family, thus Mac Studio's performance crown may be short-lived... And that thing needs to be released first for the M1 family migration completion in terms of the products stack. So I'd venture we might see Ultra Pro ;) this summer or autumn, before Apple decides to revitalise the lower end of the spectrum again. They might need to do this in order to gain all the pro-sumers on-board before those users decide to switch to Zen3/Zen3+/Zen3-3D ThrearipperPro and AdlerLake/SapphireRapids HEDT product stacks... as such, Studio might be just an appetizer, a pretty expensive one at that. At least Macbook Pro gives you power/performance in a moblie format factor, thus making it better choice. Had the Studio been priced lower, the story would've been different, but with Ultra costing roughly close to 10x the base M1 Mini, I'm wondering whether a compute cluster built out of such 10 machines wouldn't be better for the workloads Ultra-powered Studio is supposed to tackle "alone".
i prefer mac studio. as long as the fan works
The Mac Studio is nice but I already have a 14" MacBook Pro with M1 Pro chip which handles anything I can throw at it with ease. I also have a 2019 27" iMac which is fully maxed out and is certainly no slouch. So, as nice as the new toys are, I guess I won't be buying a Mac Studio at this time.
I ordered the Apple Studio M1 Max 32 core, with 32GB ram and 1TB sd plus the Studio display, w/tilt only. I couldn't justify the 20 core 48/65 core Max or the height adjustment on display. I wanted 64gb memory too but delivery date would of pushed to end of June for Studio and Adjustable display.
Tissue box
quite useless. Everything you said I can see on the web-site. Why not run some tests with DaVinci and Premiere? Thanks for your time.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
A