IPv6 Subnet Masks - N10-008 CompTIA Network+ : 1.4
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2021
- Network+ Training Course Index: professormesser.link/n10008
Professor Messer’s Course Notes: professormesser.link/008cn
Discount exam vouchers: professormesser.com/vouchers/
- - - - -
The need to subnet is minimized in IPv6, but there are still subnetting fundamentals that are important to know. In this video, you’ll learn about IPv6 subnetting and how most networks implement IPv6 subnet masks.
- - - - -
Subscribe to get the latest videos: professormesser.link/yt
Calendar of live events: professormesser.com/calendar/
Frequently Asked Questions: professormesser.link/faq
FOLLOW PROFESSOR MESSER:
Professor Messer website: professormesser.com/
Twitter: professormesser.com/twitter
Facebook: professormesser.com/facebook
Instagram: professormesser.com/instagram
LinkedIn: professormesser.com/linkedin - Наука
Loved that little chuckle when you said “18 million trillion..” you’re usually extremely focused on delivery with no time to joke (which is a good thing)
Nice! I worked for Comcast for 5 years and at one point we used the ipV6 address to log into the back end of our modems whenever we needed to change anything or verify info . Full circle 😎
NGL IPv6 is really intimidating to understand, but the capabilities are astounding!!!!!
Thank you I needed this. Starting Network Support practice soon.
You make this alot easier for me thanks.
👏 Well understood for the first time
Really great video!
Thanks!
So with IPv6 addresses there are so many addresses available per person you can put each end device on it's own subnet?
only if ipv4 subnetting was that easy :\
I spent the last 2 months tackling IPv4 subnetting before it made sense. This is so much easier to understand thankfully
blud what
Am I understanding it correctly that subnets can be nested then, and we can/could have a toplevel subnet, and then a computer/switch/router could subnet further? I imagine this might only be something a very large company could or might do, but... is that a correct understanding?
If IPv6 is subnetting the forth octet, is it going to be /48 instead of /64 given 2600:DDDD:1111 are already prefixed? Or this type of subnetting is used only for IPv4?