CORONATION OF POPE PAUL (IN COLOUR)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 июл 2015
- (4 Jul 1963) Movietone's pictures show highlights of the Coronation ceremony of Pope Paul which lasted more than 2½ hours.
Find out more about AP Archive: www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Twitter: / ap_archive
Facebook: / aparchives
Instagram: / apnews
You can license this story through AP Archive: www.aparchive.com/metadata/you...
Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee;
blessed art thou amongst women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.
Amen.
Ad Maiora Dei Gloriam.
RETURN OUR TRADITION!
we still kept our traditions, it is the Order of the Liturgy that was changed
The current pope doesn’t even wear the papal Mozzetta anymore.
@@rommelbugho6359 is it a must?
@@ahprice1887 absolutely.
Hopefully not the last.
Someone find the song in the background, need for a thing
Oops, he's a saint now
Vivat and Cheers Saint Pope Paul VI !
Alguien sabe si hay una grabación de toda la Santa Misa de coronación del Papa Pablo VI?
💞🇲🇬🦁🇲🇬💞Grandissime Souverain Pontife🌿✝️🌿 Saint Pape Paul VI 💐🇻🇦🌿✝️🌿🇻🇦💐!!!
And the very last coronation.
The tiara looks like a tea urn
Pope Paul VI: decides to get rid of coronations
Also Pope Paul VI: *has a coronation*
Wasn't it John Paul I who got rid of coronations?
Any pope who want a Coronation can have it
@@christopherthorkon3997 Yes.
the beginning of the end
The last papal coronation
For now.
The youth yearn for tradition and one day a return to tradition could be.
I Adore Pope Paul 111 aswell as Saint Francis The POPE of the Holy sea
Do you ADORE Popes? Please remember that ADORATION is due only to God Almighty.
The same people who claim that they are righteous and are true are the same people who doubts the seat of Peter, established by our LORD Himself. Isn't it not a pillar of the Universal faith to look upon the Blessed Apostle's successor with respect, both for the person and the power he held as Potifex Maximus? The same people who say they abide with the Church's traditions deny the sacredness and power of the Supreme Pontif. The Church had faced many reformations throughout the ages, we are the Universal Church by the way aren't we? Openness while retaining the holiness of the mass, opening new ways for the laity to participate and gaze upon the power of the Eucharist, something now can be more clearly understood but still remain its mystery. The Novus Ordo does not intend to bury sacred traditions but to simply make it more clearer in a world advancing more rapid as ever. It wishes to introduce the blessedness of our beloved traditions in a more 'open armed' manner.
If you truly believe in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church established by Christ Himself through Peter and his successors, you shall always abide by the orders of Bishop of Rome. Good or Bad Pontif, all are in God's plan, as He Himself said that He will not let the gates of Hell penetrate His Beloved Church. If you believe, you abide, you submit.
Thank you! God bless and stay safe!
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism.
The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith.
However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West).
At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church").
Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism).
The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
@@annefranciselizabeth3840 I am very sorry, but there is no such thing as Romanism nor Roman Church. We are the CATHOLIC CHURCH. Some may refer to us as Roman Catholics but that wouldn't make any sense because there are many more rights in the Church than just Roman (Latin). We have the byzantine, coptic, ethiopian, etc. And with the issues of SOME clergy having a "quest" for power, money, sex etc just like how you said, why should we leave the Church, Jesus, just because some of His followers commit grave sins? Will you leave Jesus just because Judas have fallen short of his mission?
And with the issue with Apostolic Succession, the Catholic Church dates as far back as the apostle Peter when he preached and was martyred in Rome. We have a record of popes from Peter to Francis, a total of 266 actually. And if you're familiar with St. Ignatius of Antioch, an apostle of St. John, one of the best Church Scholars, and a Church Father, he recognized the authority of the chair of Peter.
“Ignatius . . . to the church also which holds the presidency, in the location of the country of the Romans, worthy of God, worthy of honor, worthy of blessing, worthy of praise, worthy of success, worthy of sanctification, and, because you hold the presidency in love, named after Christ and named after the Father” (Letter to the Romans 1:1 [A.D. 110]).
“You [the church at Rome] have envied no one, but others you have taught. I desire only that what you have enjoined in your instructions may remain in force” (ibid., 3:1).
As always, God bless and stay safe especially in these trying times. I hope that I have cleared some issues and open a door for your reconsideration of the Catholic faith.
Again, God bless always!♥️
The man who set in motion the accelerated decomposition of the Church was ironically the last one to be crowned
Why? Kindly elaborate?
@@wallflower1852 Second Vatican Council.
Also disbanded the Vatican guards and left only Swiss guards, destroyed the pontifical and Roman nobility, destroyed many traditional elements in sacramentals and promoted or at least didn’t condemn some heresies that were widespread in all of the Catholic world
Catholic Church is fine. Tiny. Not same as Vatican II anti church
@@wallflower1852the poster is a sedevvecantist aka a protestant
Needless extravagance or a chance for people to think God is closer to us even if for a day?
como siempre el protestante con envidia, por cierto lo único en que tienes razón y es que el Papa si es un rey, pero a este nunca se le debe adorar, ya que el único que recibe adoración es la Santísima Trinidad.
@@britanniacountryball.8557 Its the office not the man, and the office is Divinely ordained.
Last time that a Pope was actually crowned. The coronation of a king used to be a sacrament in the RC church but that also ceased to be. Not sure if that can happen again. Neither do I know when the sacrament was abolished...
How can the Sacramental of the anointing of kings be abolished since it has been practiced since biblical times and continually by the Whole Church East and West?
It was never a Sacrament, there are seven of them (Baptism, Eucharist, Confirmation, Penance, Anointing of the sick, Marriage and Holy Orders), of which none includes king coronation. King coronation was a sacramental, perhaps, as is the scapular or the blessing of anything, and although there could be a ritual like this even in our days, there is no Catholic monarchy that uses it.
Ah...Novus Ordo 😂
No perché siamo nel 1963 per il Novus Ordo almeno il 1966.
Tiene la misma pompa de la Iglesia palmariana.
pues por que los palamarianos se copiaron de la Iglesia Católica.
Nada concuerda con la humildad esto es muy diferente a lo que tiene que hacer yn pastor de una. Iglesia
lee exodo 28 y veras que las vestimentas de los sacerdotes eran pomposas, por que era para la adoración de Dios.
SEDEVACANTE NON UNA CUM
NOM NO PAPAM.
Johannes XXIII Papa est,
Paulus VI Papa est,
Johannes Paulus I Papa est,
Johannes Paulus II Papa est,
Benedictus XVI Papa est,
Francisco Papa est,
et cetera...
sedevecantismi et sspx schisma est.
0:30 - Ladies and Gentlemen, it is Liberace! Oh wait, no sorry it is the pope.
Is that supposed to be funny, asswipe?
All hail the Roman King, leader of Rome in the 20th century. All come to WORSHIP their king. The complete opposite of christianity.
@Jack Hummell Jesus' triumphant entry into Jerusalem was on the back of a donkey. I don't recall He or any of the apostles living in such opulence
@Jack Hummell the pope's procession is an exact replica of the Egyptian pharaoh one
@Jack Hummell just look. Look up photos of processions of pharaohs
This isn't what Christianity is about. All this pomp and ceremony and extravagance while people still starved.
you are living a comfortable live while people starve, shame on you
I wish the church continued this tradition ok get rid of the pope being carried on a chair but bring back the rest
Who made the Pope of Rome the Father of Kings and Princes? Don't all Kings receive their authority directly from God when the Bishop Anoints them with the Holy Oils?
@@adolphCat where did you get that idea
@@thatdude8850 What have I said that people didn't believe for the last several few 1000s of years? Popes clamming authority over our Kings and Princess is a way more modern idea and doesn't make any sense, at least not me. Therefore, I oppose the Coronation ceremony for Popes as I neither agree with the Theology of it or the Political Outlook it entails. I don't want to be ruled by an Italian Prince far away in the Vatican. I prefer the Princes of my own People. Who made the Pope ruler of the World, if not the Pope's own narcissistic pride.
@@adolphCat I think the Divine Right of Kings, the idea that kings derive their authority directly from God, is a more modern idea in the West at least. In the Medieval ages, the kings were indeed seen as God’s representatives but had to also get the legitimacy of the Church which was seen as ultimately God’s community. An excommunicated ruler for example could be deposed legally (if the nobility used it as a justification). Recall that the Pope claimed the right for instance to crown the Holy Roman Emperor and thus claimed the right to deny him that title. Of course, the Church’s approval mattered less when feudalism faded and centralized royal authority and the rise of nation-states began since legitimacy started to be seen as a right of blood. This also mattered even less when the Reformation occurred and half of Europe stopped recognizing the Pope’s authority. In Eastern Europe, indeed it was seen that the rulers got their authority directly from God. This can be seen in the differences in ritual: in the West, a bishop crowns the ruler. In the East, the bishop hands the crown to the ruler and the ruler crowns himself.
@@raphaelledesma9393 Thank you for your response showing some deep historical understanding. However, you left out a vital question who gave the Pope any legitimate authority he possess beyond what any other Bishop has? There is no sacrament that makes a man Pope, the Office of Bishop possess the fullness of the priesthood, so any legitimate authority the Pope has beyond that of any other Bishop has been given to him, by either the State or Church and as such can be removed from him respectively by either the State or Church. The Pope never received from God any authority to depose the Emperor, the Pope never received from God authority over the Church outside of the diocese of Rome, all authority legitimately exercised beyond this has been voluntarily given him by the Church or the Emperor, and can be taken away from him respectively by the Church and or the Emperor.
This is the 1962 Missal. A few years later we got ugliness. Why??
His Anti Holiness