Are Robot Vacuums FINALLY Worth Buying in 2025?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 15

  • @Softsausage06
    @Softsausage06 12 дней назад +31

    Wtf why would you take a vacuum sponsor for this. Completely invalidates your opinion

  • @zoppp621
    @zoppp621 Месяц назад +2

    Side brush doesn't work on carpets and it has trouble with black rubber anti fatigue mats. I have two of them

  • @MarcSpctr
    @MarcSpctr Месяц назад +4

    My inly issue is that they for some reason refuse to work offline only.
    And I really do not want an Internet connected Camera that can roam freely around my house.

  • @ummshaikha1701
    @ummshaikha1701 3 дня назад

    ❤️ thank you! Helpful

  • @jwr6796
    @jwr6796 5 дней назад

    How is pet mess detection these days? Would love a good robovac, but I've got a couple of old dogs who aren't always keen on braving the cold to go outside, and I've seen horror stories of robovacs streaking pet messes all over the house...

  • @samsulummasamsulumma6898
    @samsulummasamsulumma6898 Месяц назад +4

    Yes, but do your feline roommates approve?

  • @Aniket2712
    @Aniket2712 Месяц назад

    1:46 ... wait, does mop even last for five years?

    • @JuanFmTech
      @JuanFmTech Месяц назад

      Does the brushes does even the vacuum?

    • @Aniket2712
      @Aniket2712 Месяц назад

      @JuanFmTech oh yeah even the brushes... I as long the cost like $50-150 it should be fine

  • @weddo22
    @weddo22 День назад

    Lol be warned if you have dogs and the robot goes for the pooh it will spread the crap all over the house lol you'll be surprised when you get home thats for sure lol.

  • @MickeyDoop1
    @MickeyDoop1 21 день назад

    3:52 that's because you're not using an actual mop lol

    • @CreatedTech
      @CreatedTech  21 день назад +1

      It is tho…

    • @MickeyDoop1
      @MickeyDoop1 20 дней назад

      ​@@CreatedTech I don't consider that kind of mop an actual mop because it's over engineered, but I guess technically it is a mop. It's literally taking you more time than if you used a traditional mop or a flat mop which would work better in that situation. It's just a silly point to me because you're just using the wrong tool

    • @CreatedTech
      @CreatedTech  20 дней назад +2

      @@MickeyDoop1 So an "over-engineered" mop is not...a mop? Weird logic! And no - it definitely does NOT take more time than a traditional mop. It also cleans much better.

    • @MickeyDoop1
      @MickeyDoop1 19 дней назад

      @@CreatedTech That's not what I said but ok lmao
      If it can't get under important areas then it doesn't clean better. I'm sure it does fine in areas it can reach, but you can get the same level of clean in a shorter time with a more traditional mop used in the right way
      Still, the video was fine. I just thought that was silly lol