Reminds me of the security officer William Murdoch who died heroically in Titanic while saving lives and went down with the ship. 80 years later James Cameron depicted him as an asshole in his film who fired upon desperate civilians before killing himself. Albeit I'll admit this is a far worse fate than just being written out of existence.
Its common in Hollywood. They have to ether give a love interest or they have to give a 'girl power' character for esg ratings. Patch Adems replaced the mans best friend with a woman who didnt exist. His best friend was murdered. Hollywood didnt think a man being murdered was sad enough so by swaping sexes they could make it sadder and add a love interest. My mother loves the move and was mad at me for telling her about this, she thinks that a man being killed ruins the story.
It was because the actor and the actress did a show together so they thought the reunion in this movie would pull a bigger audience. Basically banking on nostalgia
@@vlr4631 I mean depends on what definition of rob youre using. If I had a movie made based of my lived experience that replaced me with a made up person I’d feel pretty robbed. As an audience member as well I’d also feel robbed that a movie based off historical events isn’t even trying to be historically accurate.
@@vlr4631 It's about giving credit where credit is due. What's hard to understand about that? Are you indifferent about someone stealing credit from you? And if you want to do historical fiction then just change the name of _all_ the characters. It's not hard.
@@Fangs1978 i think that's where we are fundamentally different. For me in scientific papers and history books credits are super important. In art... Not so much. They can do what they want
@@vlr4631 it would be different if the movie was not a historical film based on true events. There’s a difference between inspiration from true events, and a historical retelling of a true event.
Damn imagine doing something so amazing and then they make a movie about your journey and turn you into a women in a relationship with your friend 💀 ☠️ 💀
I feel the same way about this as I do when they changed one of the agents in Narcos into a woman. You do not have the right to replace real people in a story based on true events, it's disingenuous and disrespectful.
@@modkip25 You mean besides historical revision?. Most people watching this show will think this is what happened. Sadly Hollywood has most often not been good at retelling history. I'm not saying you are forbidden to make historical fiction inspired by true events, but at the very least, tell your audience that is what you are doing. I've had serious conversations where i have to explain, that William Wallace didn't seduce Princess Isabelle, since she was 10 when William Wallace died. I know several people who gets their "passion" for history from Hollywood movies and TV shows.
@@ellis7622 oh what absolute BS....did YOU watch the whole thing? He danced around it and gave some halfass apologetic take on it while also not directly addressing it. This kind of thing is plainly wrong - end of story and any wishy-washy "oh-lets-avoid-tackling-this-head-on" is abject cowardice. Go take a nap - The adults are talking.
He literally gave an example of a female balloonist. How is Hollywood casting a hot woman into a different story for male audiences an example of feminism?
@@soundwavegamer2321 There were two possible balloon stories. One about the pioneering female ballonist, and another about two pioneering male balloonists. Hollywood combined it into one to make a more romantic story that keeps the interests of male audiences. Something it does regularly. How does that have anything to do with feminism?
@@thl205 it has nothing to do with feminism and you’re right. These bozos who scream feminism like the literal sjws they criticize don’t realize the reason changes to movies like this one are made is to solely boost ticket sales. Hollywood doesn’t care about sending a message only if that message can make them money but these brainrotted people see it as Hollywood pushing some sort of agenda when it’s only been about selling a movie.
That's not what " wokeness" is. The acknowledgment of racial injustice has nothing to do with a director and writer deciding to be historically inaccurate for the sake of forced inclusion.
"Okay. Movie idea. Balloon dudes from Victorian Era." "Haha yes great!" "And the balloon dudes journey is like whackey." "Sorry? Dudes?" "Yes. Dudes. Plural. It was two guys." "ehhhhhhh nah nah nah nah GET ME A WOMAN."
It is one thing if you take a work of fiction and change a characters race/gender etc because they were never real to begin with. But to take a real life story and completely add a character that never existed only to replace someone who was involved a lot and then omit that person completely from the story is just garbage. This one reviewer said exactly what I feel the writers/studio were going for. "inspires young girls and nudges the perspectives of young boys... (revealing) that women can be just as excited about taking a hero's journey as any man can." But instead to me it says History can be rewritten to include everyone so no feelings are hurt and we can ignore anything bad that took place in the past.
So they couldve Made another movie or a different one with an actual female main character...but didn’t. I think they’d probably call this more progressive (despite it clearly not being the case).
”This movie was based on real historical events” Yeah but could you not have told us you robbed and disgraced a great scientists of his fucking legacy in the process of making this movie?
“So, other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?” Obviously, the film makers were more concerned with political correctness/wokeness/whatever than they were about historical accuracy and telling a truthful account.
The other part of this is it's actually robbing not just Coxwell but in fact his family of his accomplishments and the credit for saving the man's life. Can you imagine how anyone would react to a film made in the future about Michael Phelps achievements as an Olympic swimmer only for his achievements to be attributed to a woman swimmer. Not Olly would it be untruthful but it actually ignores all the female multi medal women athletes who have actually competed and won at the Olympics and their story in getting there.
I remember seeing it when i was younger and already knew it was BS "Strong independent and i dont need no man " attitude wouldn't work back than Im surprised she wasn't made black 😂
Everyone keeps saying this about inclusion, but to me it seems that the filmakers wanted a woman because they were worried people woukd think theyre gay
As a finn myself I was quite glad to hear that Finnish voice likes are coming to the game although there is one point of critique I must make. The voice lines when you shoot at a target sometimes say the word "mukainen". The word is quite uncommonly used in Finnish society and it weirded me out at first and still does. Now, I don't know how to directly translate the word "mukainen" to English but there are certainly better, more suitable, words to use when hitting a target. It's also a bit awkward that a tank crew, that is in the middle of a heated battle, would shout out a word which many Finns might not even say/hear in a whole year due to how easy it is to convey the meaning of the word with other, more common, words.
I really wish there was a historical accuracy board of some sort like there is a movie ratings board. I have no issue with historical fiction. I just hate when movies make changes that make no sense to the story, like this one. I also wish that movies would use “Based On” and “Inspired By” more accurately, whether it’s history or a book adaptation. If a movie is based on something, then be as accurate as possible. If you wanna change a bunch of stuff, then just say its “Inspired By.” I have no issue with that, just be honest about what you are doing as a director.
Of course. Of course they replaced him that way. Shocking though they chose her over Halle Berry or Sexy Redd. I mean “Balloon Town” might be a hit “my hot air balloon round, we way off the ground, Balloon Town, Balloon town, just left Balloon town”
Y'all need to calm down in the comments blaming feminism or inclusion. There are only two reasons they made the character female: 1) So they could shoehorn in a romance subplot, which they seem compelled to do in every damn movie regardless of its value to the plot (usually none). 2) So they could establish the male lead was definitely not gay, no sir, can't have two same-gendered close friends alone for an extended period!
Three actually 3) They wanted to include have a feminist message by including a strong female protagonist. Let's be honest its probably a combination of all three.
literally! I can't stand when this channel reviews any movie with female characters in it because the incels in the comments always act up. It's so annoying, these idiots act like they're watching a documentary, just go read a fucking book about the event jfc.
It's kinda hurtfull tbh, imagine you live through a great deal of history and manage to make a name for yourself. Then suddenly when public decide to spread your story, your existance are wipe out since it didn't fit the narrative. I mean I know that a history movie won't beed to be 100% accurate to a history since the main purpose of thr movie are to entertain not to teach us. Still tough...
Why do people keep thinking movies are made to be historically accurate documents? It's entertainment and art. Nobody asks a kid drawing a fire which fire it is and then critiques the fire based on historical documentation. For crying out loud.
It just goes to show the women are being transplanted in male roles because of today's societal crap. I'm so sick of these replacements. That goes for superheroes too.
This feels like an attempt to promote women in film only to create a woman who doesn’t exist based on a real woman with totally different history to fill the role in the main story of another man. It’s kind of like when you go back in time to find black female leaders only to replace people who are from a different region and make them black in the show. This does a disservice to the people in history who are incredible but just get shut out at every turn. The best way to tell people a gender or race doesn’t matter is by telling stories where you artificially place them in a role rather than looking for the real historic individuals.
Apparently his pilot’s surname was a nickname and they got up to all sorts of shenanigans while up in the air and that’s why to this day the cabin of an airplane is called the cockpit.
How is pointing out that this effective revision of history is wrong "incel" behaviour. You strike me as the kind of person who'd be the first to talk out against a film which didnt portray a fringe community in the best of light.
Wait ! Let's look up Henery Cox. He may have been a very feminine role. Who knows ? I need more info than I can get from a RUclips Short. Brb with my findings. Something tells me the real story is with Henry.
Typical. There will be a diversity here for Apollo 11 here in a few years. As a student of history. I look for the original pencil, while those who want what makes them feel included in history look for the biggest and newest eraser.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Otaku Hot Girl [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/USxIYOaIpig/mqdefault.jpg)
Reminds me of the security officer William Murdoch who died heroically in Titanic while saving lives and went down with the ship. 80 years later James Cameron depicted him as an asshole in his film who fired upon desperate civilians before killing himself. Albeit I'll admit this is a far worse fate than just being written out of existence.
Didn't the family sue?
Its common in Hollywood. They have to ether give a love interest or they have to give a 'girl power' character for esg ratings.
Patch Adems replaced the mans best friend with a woman who didnt exist. His best friend was murdered. Hollywood didnt think a man being murdered was sad enough so by swaping sexes they could make it sadder and add a love interest.
My mother loves the move and was mad at me for telling her about this, she thinks that a man being killed ruins the story.
@@atomic_wait Yes they have
@@johnschwalb Only goes to show that no one gives a shit when a man dies.
@@TheDogGoesWoof69magatards when trump isn’t even mentioned but they have to talk about it otherwise they explode
Why not make a separate movie about a French female balloonist from Napoleonic times?
Honestly that would be pretty cool since he wanted to invade britain via balloon and spoke to her about it
why not both? :)
Because that's not how Bolshevik propaganda works
It was because the actor and the actress did a show together so they thought the reunion in this movie would pull a bigger audience. Basically banking on nostalgia
Because they don’t care about actual historical accuracy.
If you want to make a movie about Sophie Blanchard then make a movie about Sophie Blanchard. Don't rob Coxwell of his place in history
In my opinion it's a bit far fetched to say creative liberties taken within a movie are robbing anyone of anything
@@vlr4631 I mean depends on what definition of rob youre using. If I had a movie made based of my lived experience that replaced me with a made up person I’d feel pretty robbed. As an audience member as well I’d also feel robbed that a movie based off historical events isn’t even trying to be historically accurate.
@@vlr4631 It's about giving credit where credit is due. What's hard to understand about that? Are you indifferent about someone stealing credit from you? And if you want to do historical fiction then just change the name of _all_ the characters. It's not hard.
@@Fangs1978 i think that's where we are fundamentally different. For me in scientific papers and history books credits are super important. In art... Not so much. They can do what they want
@@tpecky5835 but it doesn't have to be? It's allowed to make more than one movie about one general topic
Wow I did not know that. That is complete bullshit on the writers part.
Ah yes the director who directs actors: famous for their scripting and casting choices
@@ChrisKat Hey you said it.
I am looking forward to a movie about the life of MONSIEUR MARIO CURIE.
“I cooka da radium…”
Hahaha...Itsa Me, Radium!
Also, the radiation gives him cool powers, because you got to get a slice of that MCU audience.
Starring Crisp Rat
Ok, this whole comment section just made my day
One of these days, film makers will realize that the real history tops a fabrication every time.... I'm not holding my breath though.
Changing movies and documentaries under the false claim of inclusion, is just pure dishonesty. It’s trying to rewrite history.
Or just trying to make a movie taking stuff from history 🤔
@@vlr4631 No.
@@vlr4631 it would be different if the movie was not a historical film based on true events. There’s a difference between inspiration from true events, and a historical retelling of a true event.
"rEwRiTe HiStOrY" babe its a movie, not a documentary.
@@ComposerKuandohan it's not a documentary.
Damn imagine doing something so amazing and then they make a movie about your journey and turn you into a women in a relationship with your friend 💀 ☠️ 💀
"a women"
@@loner1878huh?
Time to make a movie about Neil Armstrong and his wife Buzzra Aldrin landing on the moon.
@@cyrusthegreat7030 "women" is plural. it should be "turn you into a woman" in this instance
@@debrickashaw9387what I am typing a english essay? My good sir I shall not care for your tomfoolery no more.
Nick Hodges is a hero we all need in current times
I feel the same way about this as I do when they changed one of the agents in Narcos into a woman. You do not have the right to replace real people in a story based on true events, it's disingenuous and disrespectful.
Obiwan - "Anakin she flew the balloon for him, for democracy!"
Anakin - "LIAR!"
I feel like todays cinema its not allowed to have a movie without a woman main role while the opposite is quite common.
Thst is categorically untrue.
@@arlopullman4926 name me one
@@realnova7429Hear that... Silence... Shows that they can't list any😂
I've been robbed of my gay balloon show
the only real crime this movie commited ^
It’s a tragedy
@@modkip25 You mean besides historical revision?. Most people watching this show will think this is what happened. Sadly Hollywood has most often not been good at retelling history. I'm not saying you are forbidden to make historical fiction inspired by true events, but at the very least, tell your audience that is what you are doing. I've had serious conversations where i have to explain, that William Wallace didn't seduce Princess Isabelle, since she was 10 when William Wallace died. I know several people who gets their "passion" for history from Hollywood movies and TV shows.
@@Gr8dane85 "hIsToRiCaL rEvIsIoN" it's a movie, not a documentary you fucking idiot.
Ah yes Tyler because two men cant be friends without being gay?
Wish content creators like this one would grow a pair and just say "this isnt right and people need to stop doing this".
Based
Did you watch the whole thing? He essentially does say that when he talks about people being justifiably upset about the movie.
At what point in the video did you think he liked it?!
@@ellis7622 oh what absolute BS....did YOU watch the whole thing? He danced around it and gave some halfass apologetic take on it while also not directly addressing it. This kind of thing is plainly wrong - end of story and any wishy-washy "oh-lets-avoid-tackling-this-head-on" is abject cowardice. Go take a nap - The adults are talking.
@@saucyrossy3698 wow, you sure are worked up over a RUclips short huh? I think you’re the one that needs to take a nap, you seem cranky.
Feminism - Giving credit to women for something they never historically achieved.
While ignoring the women who actually did achieve things
He literally gave an example of a female balloonist. How is Hollywood casting a hot woman into a different story for male audiences an example of feminism?
@@thl205 because they changed another person into said character while giving her the traits of another famous person.
@@soundwavegamer2321 There were two possible balloon stories. One about the pioneering female ballonist, and another about two pioneering male balloonists. Hollywood combined it into one to make a more romantic story that keeps the interests of male audiences. Something it does regularly. How does that have anything to do with feminism?
@@thl205 it has nothing to do with feminism and you’re right. These bozos who scream feminism like the literal sjws they criticize don’t realize the reason changes to movies like this one are made is to solely boost ticket sales. Hollywood doesn’t care about sending a message only if that message can make them money but these brainrotted people see it as Hollywood pushing some sort of agenda when it’s only been about selling a movie.
Damn that information really makes my Coxwell
In other words, real history was sacrificed on the Altar of Wokeness yet again.
That's not what " wokeness" is. The acknowledgment of racial injustice has nothing to do with a director and writer deciding to be historically inaccurate for the sake of forced inclusion.
HAHAHAHA
Political agenda in historical movies in a nutshell.
the political agenda of making movie inspired by real life, what a fucking crime!!!
Simon Clark made a fantastic video about this
All that time up in that damned balloon just to be replaced by a bloody woman?!
Why would they do this to me?!
“Never let the truth get in the way of a story”
- Hollywood
"Okay. Movie idea. Balloon dudes from Victorian Era."
"Haha yes great!"
"And the balloon dudes journey is like whackey."
"Sorry? Dudes?"
"Yes. Dudes. Plural. It was two guys."
"ehhhhhhh nah nah nah nah GET ME A WOMAN."
Terrible, terrible, _terrible,_ direction choice for what otherwise might have been a pretty decent movie.
original characters are a crime.
I wish my last name was Coxwell. That would be so awesome. Here I am stuck with the name Wellon Doude.
Ayyyyy good one lol
Everyone knows a woman invented the fire needed to give lift to the air balloon too.
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie and was amazed that a woman got such respect in that age.
Didn’t realize it was a fairytale 😂
So it's just more propaganda to convince us that women actually do things
Incel spotted.
Rewriting history is what we do best now adays
Always have been it’s nothing new.
"rEwRiTe HiStOrY" babe its a movie, not a documentary. You fucking clod
“Rapunzel”
~starring Jada Pinkett Smith
It is one thing if you take a work of fiction and change a characters race/gender etc because they were never real to begin with. But to take a real life story and completely add a character that never existed only to replace someone who was involved a lot and then omit that person completely from the story is just garbage. This one reviewer said exactly what I feel the writers/studio were going for. "inspires young girls and nudges the perspectives of young boys... (revealing) that women can be just as excited about taking a hero's journey as any man can." But instead to me it says History can be rewritten to include everyone so no feelings are hurt and we can ignore anything bad that took place in the past.
“Yeah, yeah, that’s a white lady in an old balloon. Checks out.”
That is where they get things like *based* on historical events.
I would ask if this was on Netflix but i see they're not black, so probably not.
oh, that would have really sent you over the fucking edge, would it have?
Hollyweird is going to keep this channel very busy
Historians will say they were roommates. Friends even.
I'm not that surprised by this 😂
So they couldve Made another movie or a different one with an actual female main character...but didn’t. I think they’d probably call this more progressive (despite it clearly not being the case).
babe its a movie, not a documentary.
And they were roommates
It's like instead of making two separate good movies about different people you get one mid historically inaccurate movie
More Hollywood revisionist history
And what you don’t mention about Sophie Blanchard is she died when she launched fireworks while in her balloon and blew herself up😂
”This movie was based on real historical events”
Yeah but could you not have told us you robbed and disgraced a great scientists of his fucking legacy in the process of making this movie?
“So, other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?” Obviously, the film makers were more concerned with political correctness/wokeness/whatever than they were about historical accuracy and telling a truthful account.
Hollywood can not make a movie without sexual tension...
We need to remake all movies so women can be the heroes. Maybe get Dylan to play the roles? I think that would be the equality we are looking for
You can't depict two men having adventures together. That's too gay apparently.
lmao so the movie is the director's fan fiction
Yes like a true story not so true story
The other part of this is it's actually robbing not just Coxwell but in fact his family of his accomplishments and the credit for saving the man's life. Can you imagine how anyone would react to a film made in the future about Michael Phelps achievements as an Olympic swimmer only for his achievements to be attributed to a woman swimmer. Not Olly would it be untruthful but it actually ignores all the female multi medal women athletes who have actually competed and won at the Olympics and their story in getting there.
Why do they have to Mary sue every fuking movie nowadays 😢
Guess bromance doesn't sell as much as generic romance
They replaced a male person from history with a female … color me surprised .
I remember seeing it when i was younger and already knew it was BS
"Strong independent and i dont need no man " attitude wouldn't work back than
Im surprised she wasn't made black 😂
Everyone keeps saying this about inclusion, but to me it seems that the filmakers wanted a woman because they were worried people woukd think theyre gay
As a finn myself I was quite glad to hear that Finnish voice likes are coming to the game although there is one point of critique I must make. The voice lines when you shoot at a target sometimes say the word "mukainen". The word is quite uncommonly used in Finnish society and it weirded me out at first and still does. Now, I don't know how to directly translate the word "mukainen" to English but there are certainly better, more suitable, words to use when hitting a target. It's also a bit awkward that a tank crew, that is in the middle of a heated battle, would shout out a word which many Finns might not even say/hear in a whole year due to how easy it is to convey the meaning of the word with other, more common, words.
I really wish there was a historical accuracy board of some sort like there is a movie ratings board. I have no issue with historical fiction. I just hate when movies make changes that make no sense to the story, like this one. I also wish that movies would use “Based On” and “Inspired By” more accurately, whether it’s history or a book adaptation. If a movie is based on something, then be as accurate as possible. If you wanna change a bunch of stuff, then just say its “Inspired By.” I have no issue with that, just be honest about what you are doing as a director.
Of course. Of course they replaced him that way. Shocking though they chose her over Halle Berry or Sexy Redd. I mean “Balloon Town” might be a hit “my hot air balloon round, we way off the ground, Balloon Town, Balloon town, just left Balloon town”
Yes let’s change a movie because women need to be recognized for things they didn’t do instead of actual things they did do
In this Feminist age women have to be in everything...even taking over historic male characters.
I thought not dying of oxygen starvation, or freezing to death were the more obvious errors! 😆
seriously
By being more inclusive they decided that taking away the accomplishments of historic figures is the way to go
Patch Adams all over again
I cant believe they genderbent Henry Coxwell lmao
I wish my last name was Coxwell that would be so awesome. I'm stuck with Wellon Doude.
Y'all need to calm down in the comments blaming feminism or inclusion. There are only two reasons they made the character female:
1) So they could shoehorn in a romance subplot, which they seem compelled to do in every damn movie regardless of its value to the plot (usually none).
2) So they could establish the male lead was definitely not gay, no sir, can't have two same-gendered close friends alone for an extended period!
No, the fault is feminism and forced inclusivity.
Sorry the truth hurts.
Three actually
3) They wanted to include have a feminist message by including a strong female protagonist.
Let's be honest its probably a combination of all three.
literally! I can't stand when this channel reviews any movie with female characters in it because the incels in the comments always act up. It's so annoying, these idiots act like they're watching a documentary, just go read a fucking book about the event jfc.
@@rexblade504 original characters are a fucking crime.
@@modkip25 Yes.
It's kinda hurtfull tbh, imagine you live through a great deal of history and manage to make a name for yourself. Then suddenly when public decide to spread your story, your existance are wipe out since it didn't fit the narrative. I mean I know that a history movie won't beed to be 100% accurate to a history since the main purpose of thr movie are to entertain not to teach us. Still tough...
Why do people keep thinking movies are made to be historically accurate documents? It's entertainment and art. Nobody asks a kid drawing a fire which fire it is and then critiques the fire based on historical documentation. For crying out loud.
Because if it’s about history then it should be historically accurate
Could’ve made two movies
That's not okay.
they omitted 3 people wtf
So it's a fictional story.
Henry cockswell
Well I'm sure he does but can he fly the balloon?
coxwell
It just goes to show the women are being transplanted in male roles because of today's societal crap. I'm so sick of these replacements. That goes for superheroes too.
This feels like an attempt to promote women in film only to create a woman who doesn’t exist based on a real woman with totally different history to fill the role in the main story of another man.
It’s kind of like when you go back in time to find black female leaders only to replace people who are from a different region and make them black in the show.
This does a disservice to the people in history who are incredible but just get shut out at every turn.
The best way to tell people a gender or race doesn’t matter is by telling stories where you artificially place them in a role rather than looking for the real historic individuals.
Its because muh womans are strong!!
Disgusting what they did to the real guy how disrespectful
but strong independent woman that don’t need no living husband.
It's just a movie
And one I didn't waste my money on lol
Oy
Naaa. I'm sure he identified as a woman...
Wokeness ruins everything
Gotta add a bit of woke
I am glad I never watched this film
It's actually pretty good. Didn't know it was supposed to be based on anyone. On face value it's entertaining.
We need more women on screen 😂 freakin feminist
Glad I haven't and will never watch it.
Apparently his pilot’s surname was a nickname and they got up to all sorts of shenanigans while up in the air and that’s why to this day the cabin of an airplane is called the cockpit.
Wokeism once again rewriting history; I’m surprised she wasn’t portrayed as a black woman.
More gender swapping of history.
Uh oh, here come the incels.
How is pointing out that this effective revision of history is wrong "incel" behaviour.
You strike me as the kind of person who'd be the first to talk out against a film which didnt portray a fringe community in the best of light.
The woke strikes again.
Another woke direction by the studio disrespecting the actual companion
Yep woke bullshit ruins another historical movie
It’s ok to twist the story as long as it’s diversified. We need more diversity.
Wait ! Let's look up Henery Cox. He may have been a very feminine role. Who knows ? I need more info than I can get from a RUclips Short. Brb with my findings. Something tells me the real story is with Henry.
History shmistory, Felicity Jones is hot and if you want to make a good movie you need some romantic tension
no you do not need that
No you horny bastard
Then make a movie where that’s accurate or appropriate.
No.
You're disgusting.
incels are getting mad about the concept of women again.
Jesus christ is this your whole fucking arguement? Bitching about it on a fucking history channel?
Aww a word you learned on Twitter a year ago. That's adorable.
@@LumpyAdams are you... triggered? 🥺
Femcels getting mad when people call out revisionist history.
@@modkip25 femininsts desperately trying to call people sexist because they’re against revisionist history.
Typical. There will be a diversity here for Apollo 11 here in a few years. As a student of history. I look for the original pencil, while those who want what makes them feel included in history look for the biggest and newest eraser.
i watched this movie for about 30 minutes and went "This is fake." And stopped watching.