The government should give subsidies on machines and after product Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '
The problem is it takes more energy than it produces, so your running on a deficit. AKA losing money AKA you have to charge people to get rid of their plastic
I would like to know if it would be possible to have everything recirculate into the system to feed itself. It seems like all the systems I see have outputs of combustible gasses, combustible liquids, char of some kind, and pollutants, but I would love to see the whole system be a closed as possible where the combustibles are burned to generate the heat for some of the steps and the exhaust from all the steps get used in either the drying of the feed stock or go through a char filter. Ultimately the output would be a horrible toxic paste but it would have been greatly reduced in volume and broken down as much as possible into simple molecules, therefore could be chemically treated to refine it. I understand wanting to sell byproducts of a pyrolysis system but if the system is open at both input and output, I fail to see how that's better for the planet. I would think that the ideal is to have a net minimal input and a result of waste reduction and transformation. What's the point of outputting elements and importing similar elements from different sources, it's like shipping laundry detergent that is 80% water just so it can be used by a washing machine combined with even more water, just ship the concentrated stuff and get rid of all the complexity of needing to move water around.
The government should give subsidies on machines and after product Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '
Thanks!! As a student and a researcher of this we can now know the anatomy,risks, and procedures of the reactor
The government should give subsidies on machines and after product
Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management
And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '
The problem is it takes more energy than it produces, so your running on a deficit. AKA losing money AKA you have to charge people to get rid of their plastic
😂
Government is never the solution.
People are the remedy
@@RiggyRonnie
91% yeild from 100gm of plastic using with catalyst
Sweet. I want to learn to do this!!
Me too
Is it cost effective?
what is the name of program you used?
Limewire 😂
@@earlygamer9106😭😭
I would like to know if it would be possible to have everything recirculate into the system to feed itself. It seems like all the systems I see have outputs of combustible gasses, combustible liquids, char of some kind, and pollutants, but I would love to see the whole system be a closed as possible where the combustibles are burned to generate the heat for some of the steps and the exhaust from all the steps get used in either the drying of the feed stock or go through a char filter. Ultimately the output would be a horrible toxic paste but it would have been greatly reduced in volume and broken down as much as possible into simple molecules, therefore could be chemically treated to refine it. I understand wanting to sell byproducts of a pyrolysis system but if the system is open at both input and output, I fail to see how that's better for the planet. I would think that the ideal is to have a net minimal input and a result of waste reduction and transformation. What's the point of outputting elements and importing similar elements from different sources, it's like shipping laundry detergent that is 80% water just so it can be used by a washing machine combined with even more water, just ship the concentrated stuff and get rid of all the complexity of needing to move water around.
Thanks a lot
دمت گرم گرم ترکوندی عالی بود مرسسسسیییی
Sir ur vedio is superb but how can we see process pls remove wording on vedio Or put down underv vedio
what you the catalytic that can we use
What catalyst we can use
@@subhamzaalima MgCO3
😮😮😮😮best
I hope not more black marketing of sand from Punjab is the cost for this environmental initiative
🪡
So you need a lot of fuel to produce small amount of fuel....... If this is profitable it has been done by large companies long ago..........
ruclips.net/user/shortsyrQ0rhheMnM?feature=share
some where wood is cheap and oil is expansive . so it's ok but it hard to do in large size because polution.
Don't go "durr no profits" monkey brain us now. Oil is still better than microplastics in your food
@@ZalamaTheDragonGod already are. Food ingredients (site) "turning plastic into protein: us military backed" 2022
The government should give subsidies on machines and after product
Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management
And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '