2:40 - Why are you comparing the cameras on distant photographs setting aperture to F4?! I'm shooting with my X-T3 and I'm sure that if you set (especially in a sunny day!) to F11 - you get much sharper shots! Yeah, because of the sensor size you probably will not get a huge difference but at least we will be sure that the wrong aperture is not the reason. The aperture is your real physical resolution of "a light picture" relatively to a frame. Talking about the sensor size I mean the size of a single pixel in the matrix of course! They're close to each other in 40Mp so the interference effect is more prominent.
For the testing of image quality to be more rigorous, perhaps you should swap the two XF F4 lens, to make sure that the difference in image quality is not due to a better sample of XF F4 (used in X-T50 in this testing).
I agree, but it is what I had available and could get from Fujifilm at the time (as they send me gear to test). Two of the same lenses are better, than two different lenses (which happened before as well).
@@cameradeals I mean you should put lens #1 on XS20, and lens #2 on T50, take some photos and video, then swap them (lens #2 on XS20, and lens #1 on T50), and take more photos and video. If T50 gives slightly better image quality before and after swapping, then it is due to the higher sensor pixels, not due to variation in lens quality (even if they are the same lens model, you know there is this thing called lens lottery). More hassles yes, but the testing would be more rigorous.
You're absolutely right, that would be a better way. But like you said: it'll take even more time, and it were to only fuji lenses I had available. Plus, important. Taking them at the same time, with the same settings, it makes sure you have the exact same photo. That is still better to compare, I think. :) I'd like to note I'm spending weeks on testing, researching, scripting, filming, and editing. And I do it as best as I can. :). I know you didn't call me out, but I thought it would be good to know. Thanks for your advise, though. Much appreciated! 😄
I am struggling to choose between the Sony A6700, X-S20, and X-T50 for mostly photo & some video - this video helps me a lot, thank you :) I really like the X-T50 size and the new 16-50 lens they made, it seems very portable. The others look more bulky to carry. But I also edit *everything* extensively in Lightroom so the presets and sim dial are not useful to me at all, which makes Sony more appealing (plus the AF and weather seal). What would you recommend btwn those 3 assuming they would all be around the same price in my area?
Hi! Happy to hear it helped you. If the Sony A6700 is as expensive as the rest (including a good lens), I wouldn't choose that one. The new Fujifilm XF 16-50mm II is really sharp and lighter that the previous version (see my X-M5 review). Only choose the Xt50 if you really need those 40mp, else it is not worth it in your case. The Xs20 would be a better fit then, I think. Did you see my XS20 vs A6700 review? ruclips.net/video/KH6OPu5Ds_U/видео.html Hope this helps!
If you want something serious: choose Canon R8! I'm not a canon fan though and I love how some Fuji cameras looks like! Otherwise I can tell you'd better choose X-S20! 40Mp pixel count for APS-C is not adequate actually. We have the real physics, real optics in the World which we're shooting in. So you can't put more and more pixels in the same frame size without getting more and more problems. Not talking about the production process even. The biggest problem is the interference. Pixels are so small so this thing is more prominent than in 26Mp matrix. 40Mp Full frame would be an awesome Fuji camera (with the same size of course)! But we have no this choice yet.
Thanks for watching my video! Thumbs up if you smiled at least once while watching or sub if you are waiting for the Sony ZV-E10 II vs Fujifilm X-M5 vs Nikon Z50 review!
@cheesedrinkal well, I did for all other shots, where it matters. For that one not. Doesn't matter for the focus test. Does it ? In the end there is one section where I put log side to side, so you see how log looks side to side. Where I actually compare film, I used the correct color correction and or luts.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
2:40 - Why are you comparing the cameras on distant photographs setting aperture to F4?! I'm shooting with my X-T3 and I'm sure that if you set (especially in a sunny day!) to F11 - you get much sharper shots! Yeah, because of the sensor size you probably will not get a huge difference but at least we will be sure that the wrong aperture is not the reason. The aperture is your real physical resolution of "a light picture" relatively to a frame.
Talking about the sensor size I mean the size of a single pixel in the matrix of course! They're close to each other in 40Mp so the interference effect is more prominent.
Good point
The X-T50 is my first camera and I love it so much.
That's great to hear! What do you like most about it ?
At higher ISOs, notice that the X-S20 retains more detail and color in the images than X-T50 (despite what the video says - see for yourself)
True, I changed from photo to photo, though. Therefore, I mention I had more noise than (I) expected. Well spotted, though :)
I noticed that too
what is that guitar song @10:15? holy cow it's gorgeous.
It is a song called 'Snow Fall' by 'Nylon & Cedar'. It is stockmusic from Audiio. Check out the description for the url :)
@cameradeals yeah i found his music and have been listening to it all day 😂
Ah that is great! :D
For the testing of image quality to be more rigorous, perhaps you should swap the two XF F4 lens, to make sure that the difference in image quality is not due to a better sample of XF F4 (used in X-T50 in this testing).
I agree, but it is what I had available and could get from Fujifilm at the time (as they send me gear to test). Two of the same lenses are better, than two different lenses (which happened before as well).
@@cameradeals I mean you should put lens #1 on XS20, and lens #2 on T50, take some photos and video, then swap them (lens #2 on XS20, and lens #1 on T50), and take more photos and video. If T50 gives slightly better image quality before and after swapping, then it is due to the higher sensor pixels, not due to variation in lens quality (even if they are the same lens model, you know there is this thing called lens lottery).
More hassles yes, but the testing would be more rigorous.
You're absolutely right, that would be a better way. But like you said: it'll take even more time, and it were to only fuji lenses I had available. Plus, important. Taking them at the same time, with the same settings, it makes sure you have the exact same photo. That is still better to compare, I think. :) I'd like to note I'm spending weeks on testing, researching, scripting, filming, and editing. And I do it as best as I can. :). I know you didn't call me out, but I thought it would be good to know. Thanks for your advise, though. Much appreciated! 😄
I am struggling to choose between the Sony A6700, X-S20, and X-T50 for mostly photo & some video - this video helps me a lot, thank you :)
I really like the X-T50 size and the new 16-50 lens they made, it seems very portable. The others look more bulky to carry. But I also edit *everything* extensively in Lightroom so the presets and sim dial are not useful to me at all, which makes Sony more appealing (plus the AF and weather seal). What would you recommend btwn those 3 assuming they would all be around the same price in my area?
Hi! Happy to hear it helped you. If the Sony A6700 is as expensive as the rest (including a good lens), I wouldn't choose that one. The new Fujifilm XF 16-50mm II is really sharp and lighter that the previous version (see my X-M5 review).
Only choose the Xt50 if you really need those 40mp, else it is not worth it in your case. The Xs20 would be a better fit then, I think.
Did you see my XS20 vs A6700 review?
ruclips.net/video/KH6OPu5Ds_U/видео.html
Hope this helps!
If you want something serious: choose Canon R8! I'm not a canon fan though and I love how some Fuji cameras looks like! Otherwise I can tell you'd better choose X-S20! 40Mp pixel count for APS-C is not adequate actually. We have the real physics, real optics in the World which we're shooting in. So you can't put more and more pixels in the same frame size without getting more and more problems. Not talking about the production process even. The biggest problem is the interference. Pixels are so small so this thing is more prominent than in 26Mp matrix.
40Mp Full frame would be an awesome Fuji camera (with the same size of course)! But we have no this choice yet.
Thanks for watching my video! Thumbs up if you smiled at least once while watching or sub if you are waiting for the Sony ZV-E10 II vs Fujifilm X-M5 vs Nikon Z50 review!
why are you comparing film in log without even converting it to 709?
Could you tell me the time stamps for the sections you have a problem with, so I can give a better answer
@@cameradeals like in the autofocus part
@cheesedrinkal well, I did for all other shots, where it matters. For that one not. Doesn't matter for the focus test. Does it ? In the end there is one section where I put log side to side, so you see how log looks side to side. Where I actually compare film, I used the correct color correction and or luts.
X100 does have a flash though
It does indeed! Silly me.