Better than digital? - Friedman IR-D

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025

Комментарии • 12

  • @Patarringle
    @Patarringle 8 месяцев назад +2

    At 5:00 you guys say that both channels don't sound the same due to component tolerances, but you can clearly see the EQ is not identical. CH1 has treble below noon and CH2 has it above. That's the slight difference you're hearing.

  • @mattw36
    @mattw36 2 месяца назад

    Probably needed to hit the ground switch in the back or update it. Some of the original ones needed to be updated which made them significantly better

  • @ritsio
    @ritsio 8 месяцев назад +1

    Cracking review. I shall be buying one!

  • @truthfactreality6814
    @truthfactreality6814 6 месяцев назад

    Hit the ground switch to get rid of the noise issue you are having.

  • @HeadHondo
    @HeadHondo 8 месяцев назад

    Demo begins at 3:35

  • @matthewr2459
    @matthewr2459 8 месяцев назад +1

    Never been more frustrated with a review. The manual was in your hand. Hope you do a follow up after you learn the absolute basics of this thing. And the noise. You didn’t even try to troubleshoot it. It was probably the pedal in the effects loop.

    • @MRxr400
      @MRxr400 3 месяца назад

      digital pedal in fx loop

  • @MRxr400
    @MRxr400 3 месяца назад

    turn the IR's on.

    • @MRxr400
      @MRxr400 3 месяца назад

      you didn't scroll through the IR's, i think you had it off as no IR light was lit up.

  • @peterfletcher6920
    @peterfletcher6920 8 месяцев назад +1

    I have one its awesome better than irx I think

    • @theponyneverstops
      @theponyneverstops 8 месяцев назад

      Was thinking about trying the IRX. Is there much of a difference?