Alex Jones Defamation Trial: Sandy Hook 'Hoax' Lawsuit - Day Three, Part One
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2022
- InfoWars host Alex Jones was found liable for defamation in relation to the statements he made claiming the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax. Now, a Texas jury must decide how much Jones must pay to a victim's parents after publicly stating said falsehoods.
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Power Point would blow this defense attorneys mind.
But then we wouldn't have the pleasure of his extraordinary penmanship!
This whole trial is Harvard Law degrees👩🏻⚖️ versus certificates of graduation from a “night school of law”💀…at a strip mall 🤡
😂😂😭😭😂😂😂😂😂😂😭👍
Wait so the argument of Infowars' defense is that Infowars is so ridiculous, poorly made, and unbelievable that their effect on the families is negligible? That's what it certainly seems like lol
Seems to be the same defense FOX uses. Funny, that.
Not even the first time they have made that argument. back in 2017 it came up in his divorce/custody case, claiming that his show was fiction and he was a character and should not be taken seriously.
Apparently the ex-wife is also rather interested in some of the points that came up in this trial since it shows he lied in that case too.
@@neeneko as I recall, that divorce was a shitshow too. This clown can turn lemons and pure cane sugar into dumpster juice when I comes to interacting with the courts. I need to look up what happened with his DWI arrest some time back; I bet he was offered a sweet deal but turned it down because... reasons, only to end up pleading guilty anyway and getting screwed. What a clown Alex Jones is! And a compulsive liar too.
And that they are just selling supplements 🤪
“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.” - Mark Twain
Perfect way to describe InfoWars viewers
@@iaintwritebacktho7230 I bet you're a clot shot recipient since youre a fool.
Pretty sure Mark Twain would not have thought much about Alex Jones.
@@beckydoesit9331 I want to tell that is your opinion. Not GOD'S. You ought to know your opinion doesn't mean much
@@iaintwritebacktho7230 I do know there are other news agencies that are not good either. But why wouldn't they bring into court the man who was giving to Alex Jones HIS report? Maybe it's because they're biased?
"Self-propelled goblin" has to be the most perfect description of Alex Jones ever uttered! The projection of RWNJs can be a goldmine!
She’s presenting herself as two different people. No credibility imo. Hopefully, this jury will see the obvious.
STAGED COULD MEAN MORE THAN JUST 1 THING HE COULDA MENT PRE PLANNED..I SAY FAKE
god i hope this judge is a legit good human
@@bradleyodonnell9225 She is a political hack.
@@bradleyodonnell9225 shes not. She put a gag order on the defense saying he cant talk about the first amendment, hes not guilty and several other bs
@@michaelatkin9649 in other words, a good judge. The first amendment is not a defense against defamation. Period.
The defense's strategy appears to be play long enough clips of Alex speaking that eventually the jury gives up on trying to think at all. Bold strategy Cotton.
Rule 106 states the the plaintiffs are supposed to play the clips in full too but they have been skirting the law with biased prejudice from the disgraceful judge!
@@cryptotex420 "If a party introduces all OR PART of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part - or any other writing or recorded statement - that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time."
Seems pretty clear that they're not required to play more than a part of the clip. If there's a 50 minute broadcast, but only 5 minutes concern relevant material, then why play 45 minutes of irrelevant nonsense?
The defense trying to say "well, you took those five minutes out of context, lets play the entire 50 minute broadcast", isn't exactly going to make those 5 minutes look any less egregious. It just forces the jury to stomach Alex Jones speaking for way longer than anyone who isn't already an Alex Jones fan is going to enjoy. Given the jury is likely not composed of Alex Jones diehards, I can't imagine that plays well for the jury.
@@cryptotex420 ::incoming joke::: SWOOSH ✈️
His trying to brainwash the jury. 😂😂😂😂
@@Killua2001 yeah guess what, they introduced the whole video not a clip, so if they would have done to work and edited the clip that would be fine, however they introduced the whole video as evidence the whole video should be watched, it's crazy you quote the entire thing but don't understand that
Hold on: Karpova was deposed as a "corporate representative" and is supposed to be testifying as a "corporate representative" for InfoWars. However, when the plaintiff attorney wants to examine her, the defense objects to her status as a "corporate representative," but then goes right back to cross-examining her in her alleged capacity a "corporate representative." Do I have this right? Is anyone else confused as to why her position in the case is only OK in deposition and for defense cross-examination?
Yes, the problem is she was originally deposed as corpoarte representative but has since lost that status and is now in court as a normal witness.
The defense basically argues that the "offense" (forgot the english term) cant address her in the present as corporate representative, but the defense feels fine arguing that they are treating her as such only in the past tense.
long story short, the defense is cheating and really bad at it.
@@Lunatic108 'The prosecution' is the term for the other side (the side that states they have a an injury and begins the lawsuit).
This defense lawyer seems to delight in writing random words and names on the chart. It is a tool that is supposed to be used to coherently and constructively illustrate or focus attention on pertinent points. He's achieving nothing the way he's using it other then making the jurors lose focus on what's being spoken. He's fabricating an appearance of having a resource containing useful information standing on the easel but his incoherent lists are actually distracting rather then constructive.
Right! If his intention was to be annoyingly boring & slow deliberately, he mastered it. Even just moving the thing a few metres, took too long.
@kim ama better then you ever will troll.
@kim ama keep on trolling when you have no knowledge to rely on.
It's because he's as much a bumbling, gaslighting buffoon as his client is.
He's working for the defense? Wow.
Law and Crime TV I'd love to donate to your channel but PLEASE start LABELING videos with file names so they can be viewed in order EASILY phones to stream. For cases and link them together in a list. This would lead to higher following for serious watchers and leave the highlight reels out as teasers for everyday folks? Thank you so much.
Wow the officers who called in stating they go in no matter what never met Uvalde cops.
Uvalde cops are still waiting in that hallway
Wow, shes actually capable of speaking after all. Yesterday she couldn't answer a single question, couldn't speak clearly or above a whisper whatsoever. She 'didn't know' the answer to anything asked and couldn't understand anything she was asked, giving unresponsive 'answers'. Now today all of a sudden when it's the defense asking the questions she answers clearly, correctly, loudly, and offers more details then required.
Funny how that works, huh
Guess when shes committing perjury she isn't very confident in herself
Any rational person would notice how drastically her confidence changed. Was surprised not to hear a 10 minute pause, her giving out a unrelated statement and having to be reguided just to finally say “I can’t say.”
Yeah... she's not even adjusted her bra straps once. 😂
we saw this is the Depp/Heard trial also...I think it's pretty normal
I mean, she's trying to answer the defense, but it's not like she is doing a good job. Her answers are pretty awful and, at least with the definition of 'terms' bits, not even remotely consistent internally or not. Meh
@@Ryansghost she's a nursing mom. When your milk is producing it burns, tingles and itches so women adjust their bras multiple ways when it's uncomfortable.
Alex Jones referring to anyone else as "crazy" is not only incredible but is comical.
....says the vapid, trendy zombie chick ironically.
He should know though, right?
Lol found a sheep that's lost her herd.
@@EmJay2022 hey. Crazy
Alex Jones is entitled to his opinion, he’s entitled to state his opinions, he’s entitled to earn a living, and is entitled as an American citizen not to be harassed , canceled, and persecuted by the government media complex. You don’t have to like him, but you should defend his rights as he would, and does , defend yours - everyday. There are a lot of naive and history-ignorant people in this country that are soon going see what real Nazism and Marxism is about, unfortunately , as we are falling off the cliff rather sharply.
yesterday she acted like she was on drugs and sluggish, not understanding and evasive, today she remembered there were cameras and she is made up n perky her memory and words/understanding has improved.....go figure
Are you dense? She's already rehearsed the defense's questions so of course she knows the answers. 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
All of a sudden the female witness has a lot to say when it’s her bosses lawyer asking questions 🤦🏻♀️
Right? All of a sudden, she has total recall of events and speaks in a normal volume.
@@charlesleroq932 Are you both bots?
@@DadaPoopoo No, we;'re deep state operatives. Put down the meth pipe.
I think she wrecked her credibility by her dramatic change in character. She wasted the court’s time the day prior.
@@MsMere78 Yes, it was such a dramatic change, it can't have gone unnoticed
"I don't know who would listen to [a stand down order]. I wouldn't listen to it. If kids are getting killed, I don't know one single officer who would not go in -on duty or off duty- to take care of that shooter by themselves." - Caller @33:50
...Uvalde, Texas knows dozens.
Unfortunately it’s not true though. These guys can’t think for themselves, they would obey a stand down order immediately. It’s in their nature they are institutionalised by choice.
I was just coming to comment about that!! 👍🏼👍🏼
Blackmailed threatened or bribed
Ask the police who stood down at recent school shooting in Uvalde TX. One finally got fired yesterday.
@@zerofox7347 like the army they all are dogs ready to obey to the state as if the state were their daddy or their God
Dude watching that whole video was straight up painful. Are they thinking if they make the jury watch it they will fool them like they fooled their audience? And why did Alex Jones leave while they played the video?
He had to go rub one out in the bathroom. Lol
when it comes down to it he can't watch his own show
It seems as if they're trying quite hard to do as poorly as possible because they feel they have a better chance of winning via appeal.
Maybe he did just have to go to the bathroom, unlike us he can’t pause court and listen to it in the bathroom. It’s also pretty hard to listen to yourself when he already does it all day with his own thoughts. It’s also cancel culture, we listen to what we disagree with so we can ruin lives by making them accountable for having different opinions. If you don’t like what someone says why would go out of your way to listen to begin with.
@@waste0fspace588 defamation
Golly, it looks like it is easier to have answers when you already know the questions. True Believers Assemble!!!
Witnesses get to practice their testimony with the lawyers they are called by. They don't get to practice their testimony with the opposing lawyers. Why are so many people acting like this is something nefarious when it happens at every trial that has ever been broadcast. When asked questions by the opposition, witnesses make sure they think before responding as they have never heard that question before and then have to make sure the question isn't worded to trap them into making a false statement or contradicting a statement they had previously made. When being asked questions by their own side, they don't have to analyze the question like that as their own side isn't trying to get their testimony dismissed or get them charged with perjury.
Oh so now the witness isn't being obtuse the whole time. Of course, it's when she's being questioned by the defense. She should have been called in contempt of court long before now yet here she is, talking about telling other people about her deposition. wtf is the judge doing?
Are you a bot? She talked with the defense's team of lawyers, which she is allowed to do. Also, this type of behavior is common in these types of trials. Have you people never seen another trial before? Witnesses are prepared for their testimony by the lawyers for their side. The previous witness, the one for the plaintiff, did the same thing when asked questions he wasn't expecting by the defense.
@@truthedministry are you a bot?
Her level of bewilderment and confusion seems to have evaporated. She seems quite able to understand complex questions and is able to answer them fairly coherently..
I wonder if she's drinking a different brand of bottled water.
I think it might have a little to do with who's questions she's answering
It's brain force, it's back in stock
When your own lawyer questions you you know the questions in advance. You are stating the obvious. Do you think the prosecutor gives her the questions in advance? She's responsible for hundreds of thousands of emails, messages, videos and reports that occured over the course of years. How can she remember all of it? She's a believable.witness. look at her compared to Amber Heard.
Tangy tangerine 🍊 100 bucks a tub! That’s what it does for ya!🤥
@@zerofox7347 What A Difference A Day Makes. She certainly was a lot Tangier than she was on day two.🤗
From the small amount of Alex Jones I’ve seen, I start off listening and then he throws in some obscurd conspiracy words and I just shut off.
Yeeeaaaaaahhh but those alleged conspiracies end up being RIGHT 95% of the time. Maybe even 99%
@@MsTifalicious no not really if you go deeper into it
@@koffiewolf please do tell. Give me other times Alex was incorrect?
@@MsTifalicious You want a list of all the bs Jones is wrong about? Listen to the podcast Knowledge Fight. They go into a deep dive on all of his crap.
The irony of him getting walked out by his body guards as they play a clip of him bashing people having body guards 🤣 that’s hilarious
Alex isn't calling for anyone to have their guns and/or bodyguards taken away. Michael Moore is calling for people to have their privately owned guns taken away while protecting himself with armed bodyguards. That is the hypocrisy that Alex was calling out.
Oh My, did I just see 55 minutes of Alex Jones show? Is the defense trying to mesmerize the jury with his charisma?
He has charisma? I couldn’t tell, I can’t get past his annoying voice. It’s like nails on a chalkboard.
Even in context Jones is purely horrible and ghoulish.
@@bp8085 It is the Dark One's genius to make people believe he does not exist
@@bp8085 To me it seems it just shows what kind of psycho Jones really is
Initial audio and video are wonky, clears @ 1:00. Hearing starts @ 5:45
Alex Quote “ People are highly suggestible!” 🤣😂
And he made a fortune off of people being highly suggestible!
I did spot that made me laugh 🤣👊
yep!
And everything he has said has came true. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@daleksummers3155 and that’s why people are doing everything they can to cancel him because they can’t face facts.
Alex and his lawyers just need to take a little breakie now... A liiiiiiittle breakie for them. And then when they come back... They're going to start the trial over.
PS. HI FELLOW WONKS!
I have risen above my enemies!
@@patarratap4231 I might quit tomorrow actually.
😁hi
It's sooooo dreamy creamy.
I’ll be better tomorrow
Reminder: Slander and Libel arent protected speech. Alex didn't produce documents, failed to produce a prepared corporate representative multiple times. Daria here is considered a corporate representative at this time as well. And reminder "it depends on definition of 'something'" was her answer when asked if Info Wars had a legal right to defame and lie about something like this again. They are indefensible. And if you listen to alex, listen, i get it. He says things that seem to have an answer to why your life sucks or why America doesnt live up to your expectations. But ask yourself; when was the last time anything he said actually made a difference? His 9/11 coverage was abhorrent and disrespectful. Every mass shooting he has covered he either questions or says the government did it with no actual citations or evidence. It may be easy to just tell yourself he has all the answers, but watch his full deposition videos. If this was their big day and they told the truth, he should have the plaintiffs eating out of his hand. Including now. But he doesn't. Thats why he was defaulted. He didnt hand over the documents they asked for. Because he thinks having it in the open and on paper, live for all to see is worse for him than just dodging the requests to admit the documents. Maybe you're embarassed? And that's okay too! Being scammed is an increasingly problematic issue, and being scammed on ideas is probably one of the most damaging of all. But you can choose to listen to the families. To the plaintiffs, and see for yourself that Alex Jones and Info Wars terrorized these families for years because he saw how much money its coverage made.
This is an excellent synopsis.
Except he made only roughly $300 off the sandy hook coverage ad revenue from their site; they made next to nothing altogether and that’s why they have to sell products like supplements. simply covering other people’s news and taking calls isn’t as profitable as you essay writers seem to think it is lol
He produced a ton of documents. He just didn't produce what they are accusing him of having and so they think he's hiding something
I hope one day soon you remove those scales from your eyes!!!
You are wrong about almost all of your ramble.
Try and pay attention
Hmmm…Daria’s testimony for the defense was significantly smoother and quicker.- dramatically so. Suddenly she speaks in a volume we can hear. Suddenly she can answer questions.
I thought that slow and halting way was how she spoke- no. She was just trying to waste time with the prosecution.
Surely Jones's lawyer didn't really think playing 50+ minutes of an Alex Jones episode is good for Alex Jones. It just shows how crazy and offensive he is all the time and creates no sympathetic view of him at all as he insults, name calls, bloviates, and misrepresents and provides misinformation. Who is that lawyer working for? The plaintiffs? Even Ms. Parkova appeared deeply sad listening to Jones and she's a 7 year employee.
They need three jurors to say a dollar. if they can get 3 people to go home and say no mas. one dollar. it throws the case out. Gamble at high stakes but, hey. they judge made him guilty in a star chamber. whole thing should have been a trial.
you choose to be offended.
Well, it just got him an episode of Infowars published back onto RUclips. Like him or not, it's pretty clever. lol
@@richardmoore6295 ye they act like they are being forced to watch Alex Jones
Evil wicked system man.
You're obviously not talking about Alex Jones.
@@jeff8039 No sir
Why is Alex able to just come in and out of the courtroom as he wishes? I understand he’s not arrested but shouldn’t he have to be in court for this hearing?
No… he has legal counsel representing him. This is not a criminal case, it’s a civil case. He would not have to be there at all if he didn’t want to be. Just like you said, he is not under arrest.
@@chrislancaster1982 thank you, I didn’t think of that. It’s just odd to see. I like watching trials but most are criminal cases. Thanks for the explanation.
According to reporting from PBS News Hour, Jones and his attorneys gave notice to the court that he is dealing with a medical condition that limits his healthfully attending any of the days in court. In general, if not a capital case, defendants can waive their right to presence which allows the legal team to speak on his behalf. It does inspire curiosity for me but considering this behavior regarding the whole deal (he did, after all, ghost his filed appeals, and has filed the bankruptcy for the parent company), I wouldn't be surprised if he was diagnosed with a serious illness, possibly deathly, around the time the defamation trial was happening and he's taking this as opportunity to shut it all down. Liquidating his corporate entity is no small decision, though the timing of the filing is certain suspect. I guess I'm thinking this due to how he seems like he's giving up on a lot of things. I thought he had fallen pretty hard when I saw him hanging out with Tim Poole and the lot around a year ago. Was almost like he was saying hi to the next gen conspiracy heads
@@Quasita thank you and I agree. But according to testimony he leaves the courtroom to go broadcast live so who knows. I don’t really care quite frankly, I just wasn’t aware that he had waived his presence and/or it wasn’t necessary.
@@jazleigh15 He's broadcasting right now while skipping out on the trial. His defense has repeatedly shown zero respect for the court, which was why the court already issued a default judgment. He doesn't have to be there but he's basically giving the court a middle finger.
kinda hope charges brought against this witness, she seems culpable also
Alex Jones isn’t even being charged why would this witness be charged. This is a civil law suit over defamation, not a criminal case
It's amazing. I hear everyone saying that "since" Columbine" everyone now goes in no questions asked...yet we have the disgusting event by the officers/cowards in Texas. 34:10 says it all...
That's EXACTLY what I was thinking
Also he's all willing to say liberals are willing to sacrifice kids but isn't it the pew pew nuts who are willing to sacrifice kids to keep their guns. They're all cowards.
Yup! As the cop from Connecticut was saying that, I was thinking what about Uvaldi, Texas? 🙄🤷🏻♀️
What What???
I’ve been working in law enforcement for going on 27 years and I agree with you. That is NOT typical of cops. I work at an agency in the SW and every time we receive a call of someone at a school with a gun my officers FLY out there and absolutely NO ONE waits for a partner. They run in. Nearly every school has an SRO (school resource officer) and the ones who don’t have one at a nearby school and that officer runs over there. Those officer in Uvalde are an embarrassment and that chief should have immediately been fired. Even the off duty officer who’s wife and child were murdered was more brave then his entire force
They stood down in Uvalde
27:20 were trained to go in with whatever we have lol yeah Uvalde police seem to disagree.
Ironically the Bohemian grove people meet around this time of the year.
Maybe Alex Jones should use them as witnesses
and alex jones as their poster child!
Actually, the 'Judge' selected the Jury pool from last year's Bohemian Grove attendees.
Not this year, they actually sold the property I don't know if they stopped or if they moved it somewhere else.
It is very smart of Alex Jones to get sued just to get an episode of infowars back on RUclips and it's only going to cost him $150m, well played Alex
Alex Jones is declaring bankruptcy so the plaintiffs won't receive any money if they win, lol
So you think people should have $150 million taken from them for an opinion?
@@666crippled666 opinions on global media have consequences!
Amazing. She can actually answer questions today. Wonder why? 🧐😌
coached
No drugs and coached.
Whatever
Can’t specifically provide what she was coached about.
So, we can apply her “patsy” rule to Jan 6? Yes, we can.
Not well-prepped. Learned the words but cannot give proper definition. 🤮
Do not like this judge 😠🤦♀️
Thanks for sharing
holy smokes imagine if they recorded the ghislane maxwell trial like this and the epstein case like this!!!!
alex lawyer is AMAZING... ole style.. man your timeline need more like this MORE MORE MORE
Again
It is FEDERAL VS STATE
are you an American?
Did you even pay any attention in school?
@@lovepet4565 you missed the word imagine clearly 🙄
It was broadcast on the BBC
@@kiskasweetybelle4503 i got it
But i keep seeing people state that somehow its a cover up
By Govt
Its not.
Objection - witness is unqualified to opine on linguistic definitions.
I’d go further and say her definitions are speculative if she’s being asked to say what Alex Jones meant by those terms. If she’s being asked her definition of those terms, it lacks relevance because her language on Info Wars isn’t the subject of the suit.
So it looks like the two lawyers met last night witrhout getting into a punch-up.
I love how any time she answers "yes, just like the mainstream media does" I thought IW wasn't like mainstream media hmm?
She's just a tiny tiny piece of trash and she's trying to fit in with all the big bag trash bags. She never will look at her she's clearly broken
She's a hot mess
This is massive. Shouldn't Lawtube be all over this, or am I missing something🤔
I agree. I'm surprised none are interested in it esp as the trial happening after being found guilty & also not being allowed to say he's innocent in court.
No one cares except extreme lefties.
This trial sets a precedent for all of US and our right to free speech. Trying to ruin a man's life won't bring their child back.
@@goodwilj you don't have the right to defame.
I'll get around to it
What planet have I been on… I had no idea Alex Jones was on trial..
It’s cuz the only people that know about it are the ones trying to cancel people for everything they say. None of these clips are recent, it’s old Alex Jones. Not saying he doesn’t still stand by his words but just shows people will do anything to attack one’s character because they disagree with them.
This should have more views than the Depp/Heard trial.
Absolutely. This trial is about way more than just defamation and touches on core issues we have to overcome before polarization of society gets so ugly that we cannot recover from it.
But Alex Jones is a literal nobody to most people. Johnny Depp is popular in his career.
lol it will oh it will... his lawyer is in your face type of lawyer... he is good ole style.. this is good.. worth every dime.
The average person cares more about famous actors, gossip and scandal. Basically nonsense.
How come msm is not being sued for conspiracy?
where is day 3 part 2?
Getting sued because someone doesn't like your opinion. People are cheering because they are about to lose a constitutional right.
And a bunch of people will attack me for pointing that out because they think it could never happen to them.
He lied and said no children died. How would you feel if your child died and he called it a hoax?
@@zxy78267 It's an opinion. Lying isn't even illegal but lying means you know something and are saying the opposite, nobody knows what actually happened so it will always be an opinion
DJ This isn’t about feelings, if you can attack people for their views, the democrats change the definitions on everything they want to be the only source of truth. Fascism isn’t a swastika anymore it’s a rainbow flag 🏳️🌈 we are being gaslighted daily. When this is allowed then you can come after fox, Rogan, Peterson, Daily Wire. I don’t agree with info wars or subscribe to their ideas but he shouldn’t be held liable for people acting out upon his reporting.
The constitutional right of free speech does NOT protect you from lying about someone. That's the definition of defamation, which is illegal.
@@aaronstanley474 I couldn't possibly disagree more with every point you are trying to make.
Where is part 2? Please stop breaking the court cases up. We know how to fast forward through breaks. Please just post the whole thing. 🙏🏼
Maybe they're not filming during breaks. This isn't taken directly from the livestream (which keeps going during breaks) but probably by a person who leaves the room during breaks.
Go to the trial yourself. Many of us are happy to get any of the trial whatsoever.
Mind you...this woman was made 'corporate representative' just a year ago.
I think she may be a patsy
Lmao at people who think this is about being guilty or not guilty. This is about the $$$$$
F Alex Jones! Hope they take every penny he has and will ever make!
$150 million sounds fair to me.
Shocking that InfoWars fans wouldn’t put in any effort to research the facts before making assumptions, right?
@@lauraweiss7875 lol I know that's right. Just need to print an "article" and wave it around yelling at a camera. Now, that's facts...
You are correct! This is the part where they decide how much money Alex has to pay.
Why is the court camera pointed directly at the jury box?
The judge has already found him guilty, this is a sham.
Because the defense refused to produce requested documents and had multiple attempts with unprepared corporate representatives. So yes. They were defaulted.
he had multiple opportunities to cooperate with the court and chose not to. courts dont just declare default guilty judgements on a whim. it’s remarkable he let it go that far. and before you reply that he did cooperate,,,, he didnt. theres plenty written about exactly what he was asked to do and how he didnt do it
He was previously found guilty. This is the penalty phase only.
Good to see that RUclips law degree is coming in handy
A bunch of dim wits LMAFO
I remember these early shows. He had a lot of listeners who were in law enforcement. But then he turned around and declared that the school shooting was fake. When he declared that his followers should harass the parents for a confession- he lost thousands of listeners. Personally, I never listened to him after that.
He wasn't just accusing these poor parents. He was insulting all of us.
Did you notice the part where that caller was claiming that cops don't stand down anymore? The Uvalde Texas shooting a month ago, flies in the face of that claim, doesn't it? (I don't listen to him anymore either, but for different reasons... I don't think cops are generally the great men and women they believe themselves to be anymore... Maybe there was a time when cops were decent... But a cop can only be as decent as the government he works for... It's all federalized now.)
Fake is what they want you to think. False flags are not fake. Real people die however it’s synthetic in that there’s always an immediate political move. The sad truth is that 1 million children can die to guns today but that will never make it right for us to lose the 2A.
@@dougokeefe1048 I am part of that early law enforcement system. The politics of that era was bad then as well. What really amazes me is that things have gotten so much worse. And no, Uvalde does not represent the average cop today.
Sadly, I do see a political trend. When Democrates have the Whitehouse school shootings seem to soar through the ceiling.
@@WgB5 sure, like Las Vegas and El Passo. Selective memory much?
@@ilibili7489 I am not sure where you are heading. So how about something more recent, like Parkland. We can be selective about all sorts of things. The reality of this situation is that Jones had no business raging against innocent parents.
when does the freezing at the Start when does it stop
1:03
I’m new here what’s this trial about?
Great Show!!!! Where can I find this Alex Jones Show?
Google.
@@Vindsus86 The trash.
Knowledge Fight.
In some garbage section
The cost of free speech is Alex Jones
🙄
Lmao when he wrote terms on the board
Omg lol
Why is he leaving the courtroom? 16:38
He’s going for a smoke break. He really should look into being over weight and smoking. I’m seeing a heart attack in his future.
@@DK-pl8xd Wow! I never saw Johnny Depp walk out for a smoke break. I honestly thought he was going to the bathroom. Seems like he was too ashamed to watch himself on video.
Just common sense stuff with how bad this government really is behaving.. This judge is still grumpy..
I'd be 'grumpy' too if I was in a room with the screamy liar Jones.
@@dianeowen5258 lol
Showing your level of intelligence
“I go along with the current thing” I do and think what msm wants me to”
@@hq9344 Yeah you are the one talking about intelligence, you Jones fans have it in abundance, right? Only you are the ones being susceptible to being duped by Jones and he is laughing on his way to the bank
All these high-profile losers have really bad lawyers who are unprofessional af. "We may not win your case, but we WILL flip people off for realz!" 😂
Bc good legit lawyers won’t represent these nut cases bc they know it looks bad!
Right? It's like they found them through one of the Colbert Show's lawyer skits - "we're Galino & Farnes!"
He's clearly trying his hardest to make this movie-worthy so he can be played by Colin Ferrell or some such.
Suppose you haven't yet seen today's revelation from AJ's incompetent counsel? Teehee 🤭
Why is there so much distortion with the audio.
Fastest writer and best lawyer in the world: Your honor i'd like to play a full episode of alex jones' show and go absolutely nowhere with it afterward.
They played a whole feature length film
Jones' lawyer is inept.
good....
So is Jones!
So is jones.
Jones is our Lord and Savior
Jones surrounds himself with inept people! 👍🏼
HIS LAWYER IS SO BAD HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
why?
@@disaffected_malcontent because he's been through about 5 already
Almost as bad as the person editing this video.
@@ItzBirdMan1337
That's because his attorneys have been threatened if they defend Alex they will l lose their jobs or Hillaryed
@@jeff8039 it's easy for them to lose their jobs when Joenes keeps firing them
where is part two?
Illuminati stole it.
@@inquisitor4635 lol looms
what a scam
She spent a lot of time with the attorney being coached. And he absolutely was gaining a cult following of conspiracy theory nuts.
Many of them are posting right here, and it's sad to see how brainwashed and ignorant of the law they are.
That sounds like the definition of the democratic party 🎉 🎉
@@nancyeaton731 give me a break
@@seanswader2124 all anyone has to do is read the comments. Sad that there are so many gullible people who want to believe anything so ridiculous.
Explain - define a conspiracy nut .. don’t use names , don’t use cute and funny examples. Define it
The Infowars attorney has nothing to work with. Perry Mason couldn't win this case.
Yes because it is a fixed trial that has already been decided by a judge and this is just a show trial with the cards stacked against him. Your rights are his rights and his right to an actual fair trial - without being told he was guilty before this fiasco started - and you should be concerned you could be next. Because you could...
@@colleenmccormick5421 Liberals think the elites care about them which is sad.
please get better sound quality
You're not the only one here, I have my phone pressed against my ear on the highest setting
Got my popcorn 🍿 ready.
yikes these comments, i’m english and even i know the first amendment doesn’t cover your right for defamation and misinformation
Exactly! Saying the government planned these attacks? Like, wow! The issue is that he kept going and calling it a hoax etc. So sad 😔
Thing is, Brits aren't as politically and ideologically polarised as most Americans are, and so tend to interpret things with a bit more common sense. Rule Brittania.
YIKES - so you overlook being LIED into wars?
But calling out corruption is just 'beyond the pale' for
nerd loser girl.
You have to actually name a person's name & lie about them for defamation. Why does no one in here know the law?
@@MrAenos did you not just see Jonny Depp win his case? His ex didn't use his name in the op-ed. You don't have to use a person's name but you do have to prove they ment you when they made the comment.
Has this chap, Alex jones, lost a child as I have?
It’s obvious none working at info wars have ever lost children or anyone to such senseless violence. They are either socio paths or just fortunate to not have suffered such a devastating loss. Yet. I have and if anyone accused me of perpetuating a hoax to gain from my daughters death I honestly wouldn’t be able to stop myself from ripping their throat out with my bare hands, that’s how much it makes my blood boil every time I hear these lies and think of these families who have already suffered the worst and will never fully recover from.
Do ur children a favor and move on. How much you want to bet your children look down on you in shame for continuously torturing yourself by going out of your way to listen to this. Like RUclips didn’t make you go out of your way to read my comment ,you did. Just move on with life for your dead kid, your live kids, and yourself. If not you’ll be spending your whole lives trying to control others. This is a democracy where freedom of speech somehow means nothing because people think they don’t have the freedom to not listen. Stay off social media if you don’t like what you see.
Is there a reason these aren’t live? Another case or something?
I'm starting to get sick of watching this man draw on a large pad of paper, and ambling around slowly/silently before speaking... The PowerPoint from opposing counsel is much more compelling, no wonder the jury ruled the way they did
Man his attorney seems so sleazy. After flipping off he other attorney off it proves he is a slime ball
Wishlist lawyer
The public in general only wants him broke enough to be eating out of dumpsters :)
the sheeple
So what exactly is this case about?
Maybe read the “description”
@@tamarathelawfirm6914 so you also don't know
1:12:00 Why is she not turning to answer the question instead of staying aimed at the jury….. 😂😂
Might be uncomfotable posture-wise to twist around to where the Mic is sitting
ALEX EITHER DOESNT UNDERSTAND NATIONAL SECURITY OPERATIONS OR HE IS CHOOSING TO IN THAT LAST SEGMENT 1:50:00 THERE IS MANY REASONS TO NOT ARREST A HIGH PROFILE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL OR TERROREIST SPECIFICALLY....THAT COULD RUIN OPPRUINITIES TO DETAIN 10 MORE WORSE THREATS ....
Ok and the average person wouldn’t know that nor care. Sometimes we are wrong but nothing is making you watch him but your own curiosity or hatred. CALM DOWN, U TRYING TO DEAFEN US IN THOUGHT BY TEXT. You screaming in text just screams Alex Jones.
What hole did this judge crawl out of?
Soros stink hole
Don't project.
@@Vindsus86
Congrats on defending tyranny!
@@bry4162 🤦
It took a while to dig that hole - 4 years of college, 3 years of law school, several years as either a prosecutor or defense attorney and then getting elected by the county where you will be the judge. I assume you crawled out of AJ's hole.
Good grief, the amount of mics in the room and the audio is still trash. WTH?
Are you a sound engineer or a Dunning Kruger'ite?
@@carlmalone4011 simply observing and noting the number of mics and the fact I have to have my volume cranked to hear anything.
He may as well write ‘chewbacca’ on that board 😂
Why does Alex’s lawyer allow all his craziness to be in view. Nutty strategy.
Because it's not nutty. He makes way too much sense.
@@paulwebber504 If you've already drunk the InfoWars-branded kool aid, sure. Make sure to buy more supplements to hide your DNA from the 5G towers.
@@paulwebber504 So you actually believe the game "Doom" was created by the Pentagon to teach people to kill without hesitation IRL? You consider yourself a serious person and hold that silly of a belief?
@@benphillips2947 if people know that he’s wrong, why go out of their way to attack him. He hurt their feelings with what he said so they hurt his representation and go for his companies money. Money doesn’t help people mourn over deaths. Those kids who died would want their parents to have money but prob not use their names in vain.
how come alex jones gets to walk out of court when and where he wants to
He claims to have a “medical issue” (cough cough cough) and some how that requires 6 people to accompany him into the hall way.
@@dreamzofhorses I notice he has “body guards” with him. Is he afraid of something?
@@ambryant414 His own fans, usually.
U lot are so sad
The lawyer with the notepad 😃.
He wants to be Cole Phelps in real life
Someone please explain!!!
Does he go to Moscow to hire his staff or does he fly them in for the interviews?
Ah yes he must be “working for the Kremlin” because he questions mass shooting and doesn’t trust his government. 🤡
Since the judge said at the beginning Jones is guilty this is about the dollar amount then Jones lawyer needs to constantly object and create a record for appeal and I don't see him doing that
his lawyer probably hates him too, like any sane person.
@@nancyeaton731 sane people generally aren't full of hate nancy.
I believe they have an "ongoing objection"
@@nancyeaton731 L for Liberal Losers
They will when this is over. And they should. What the judge did was ILLEGAL.
I missed out on the Alex Jones on Twitter era.
My lord the adds in this video is insane.
Wait till he loses this case he will toss this public pretender under the bus and talk all kinds of sh" " / trash about him.
Oh so you're saying that YOU would praise them?? 🤔🤔
poor poor Alex, the thought of him losing his guns forever, never being able to hold them again, make memories, see them growing to their full potential, making guns of their own.. such a plague its so sad
😢🎻
savage lol
It’s not a criminal case…
@@Diddle1414 it's a joke... about him losing his guns bc he already lost the kids 🤣
@@EricYoungVFX Yeah, custody battles are really funny. Especially for their 9-year-old.
How can ppl listen to AJ. His voice is giving me a headache.
Sounds like he has a frog in this throat
Purgery
She needs to work on her definitions...so poorly prepared , a joke just like infowars aka infojunk ❤❤❤
he is insane and so are his listeners
So what was the board all about
Why did he get up and leave in the middle of testimony?
No clue, I found that odd. I can’t find anything explaining it.
Nevermind, apparently, the jury was told that he might leave due to a medical condition…..but he was LIVE ON INFOWARS!!!! During the trial!! 😱🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️