1848 Prototype And 1851 Feldstutzer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 29

  • @Foche_T._Schitt
    @Foche_T._Schitt 6 лет назад +1

    Typically I'm not interested in muzzle loaders but the muzzle crowns and ramrods have grabbed my attention.

  • @larryclark9380
    @larryclark9380 2 года назад

    My 1851 has a tapped hole for a tang sight. Have you ever seen one for sale? Looking looking…
    Great information on your video. Nice rifles.

  • @keith0alan
    @keith0alan 6 лет назад

    A trick to estimate the number produced is to find the serial numbers of all the examples you can. Find the average of those numbers and multiply by 2. Not precise but a reasonable estimate.

  • @bdoggable
    @bdoggable 2 года назад +1

    I have 1848 SN #8
    1871 rear sight square notch for tang site wide flat chanfer on Muzzle front sight guard

  • @Matt_The_Hugenot
    @Matt_The_Hugenot 8 лет назад +1

    Nice website, Chap.

  • @roadpanzir
    @roadpanzir 8 лет назад +1

    The 1848 is a beauty!

    • @thebotrchap
      @thebotrchap 7 лет назад

      Thank you, if I hadn't studied that book I would have never realised what it was.

  • @jumpykilllerqx6029
    @jumpykilllerqx6029 8 лет назад

    Do a video about smokeless propellents used in history and what was the orginal propellent used in the 6.5 carcano.

  • @pgtmg624
    @pgtmg624 8 лет назад

    Any books you could recommend (Chap, Bloke, anyone) on early Swiss perccussion an flintlock muskets and rifles writtten in english?
    Thanks great video as usual

    • @thebotrchap
      @thebotrchap 8 лет назад

      In English none that I can think of. Even in German or French there is no standard work on it. Part of the problem is that each canton was free to do as they pleased provided their guns could fire the average 17.5-18mm ball ammo. Only from 1842 did things get standardised with a universal percussion conversion and the newly built 1842 smoothbore percussion musket ordered from various Belgian gunmakers. There is an excellent book covering 1842-1867 but only in German.

    • @TheMysticalBadger
      @TheMysticalBadger 4 года назад

      @@thebotrchap What is the title of the German work? Also, do you know of any source of molds for the 1863 pattern bullet?

    • @thebotrchap
      @thebotrchap 4 года назад

      TheMysticalBadger Hi, the book is volume 2 of a series called Bewaffnung und Ausrüstung der Schweizer Armee seit 1817. The book is “Eidgenössische Handfeuerwaffen bis 1867.

  • @nosaltiesandrooshere7488
    @nosaltiesandrooshere7488 7 лет назад

    Very beautiful "Field Stuzer" and an interesting further development within >3 years from the drawing board to the final Ordonanz weapon, in spite of the simplification beautiful compartment preserved. Does this weapon have the same "compression bullet" as the Austrian Lorenz rifle M 1854?
    Zwei sehr schöne "Feldstuzer" und eine interessante Weiterentwicklung binnen >3 Jahren vom Zeichenbrett bis zur endgültigen Ordonanzwaffe, trotz der Vereinfachungen sind sehr schöne Deteils erhalten geblieben.
    Hat diese Waffe das selbe "Stauchungsgeschoß" wie das österreichische Lorenz Gewehr M 1854?
    [Die deutsche Sprache ist für mich wesentlich präziser in Ausdrücken und Bezeichnungen!]

  • @HawaiianSurfer96
    @HawaiianSurfer96 2 года назад

    From where do you know what & how much powder and what bullets to load in these?

    • @BlokeontheRange
      @BlokeontheRange  2 года назад

      From the books which deal with them and their ammunition :)

    • @HawaiianSurfer96
      @HawaiianSurfer96 2 года назад

      @@BlokeontheRange Thanks! Do you have a particular book in mind about these? :)
      Im currently watching all your muzzle loading videos 😄

    • @BlokeontheRange
      @BlokeontheRange  2 года назад +1

      Chappie can better answer you that, cos it's his book :)

  • @suzannegreenaway1109
    @suzannegreenaway1109 7 лет назад

    How do you send you info on this 1851 subject. D.F.H.

  • @demos113
    @demos113 8 лет назад +1

    Oops.... i thought Chap was Bloke after he shaved his beard off. lol
    My mistake. :)

    • @thebotrchap
      @thebotrchap 8 лет назад +1

      I don't know whether to be flattered or disgusted....

    • @35rem19
      @35rem19 8 лет назад +2

      At least he didn't mistake you for Frenchmen

  • @betaich
    @betaich 7 лет назад

    The Link to the chaps website in the description doesn't work.

    • @thebotrchap
      @thebotrchap 7 лет назад

      Thanks, will get it altered!

  • @suzannegreenaway1109
    @suzannegreenaway1109 7 лет назад

    Do you have e mail

  •  8 лет назад +1

    Not first comment. Nice video :)

  • @grimbotactical2438
    @grimbotactical2438 8 лет назад

    first comment