If the death of Susant Singh Rajput is considered as a suicide, I think it can be reenacted as a tragedy following all the key elements of Aristotelian theory of an ideal tragedy. In case of plot there will be an Exposition, Rising action, Climax (where Susant, the protagonist will face so many huge personal problems and have mental dilemma with dramatic soliloquies before taking decision of commiting suicide), Falling action i.e perieteia (where the protagonist will see that all his dreams starting with to be a bright star in the sky of film industry and to lead a very happy life is being finished and destroyed gradually/ where the protagonist will face a reversal of his expectations) and also the Denouement i.e catharsis (where with the final resolution, the pity and fear about the protagonist's plight aroused in the hearts of the audience is purged out as they reach a restive psychological stage.) The enactment of Susant's death will follow the characteristics of Aristotle's ideal concept of tragedy. It will be mimetic (as it will be performed not narrated), serious, lengthy. It will also be the imitation of an action as it may occur in anyone's life. And it must arouse pity and fear among the audience. It will also have hamartia, hubris and anagnorisis.
This is my first video watching and I have understand everything about tragedy from this video and thank you so much Madam Can't wait for the next video ☺️
The difference between Mimesis and Diegesis is critical to understanding Shakespeare's plays. Not to enjoying them, of course, but to understanding them. For example, Sycorax in The Tempest is never actually shown on stage, being the deposed witch-queen of the island that the witch-king Prospero colonized. So everything we "know" about her is purely from the Diegetic perspective of Prospero and Caliban.
Ma'am can you make the 2 nd part of it. I mean you only said that you are gonna cover the rest of the topics like tragic hero, hubris, hamartia etc. So if you can please do us this favour ma'am. 💙😊❤
I do not think SSR’s death as a Tragedy, since the feeling of catharsis is absent, there’s no sense of tranquility in his death because of the mysterious circumstances around it. the state of anxiety and unanswered questions is ever present,hence, no feeling of relief. our hearts are still disturbed to how and why it led to all of that ending. not to mention he was just 34 y/o at that point, so an incomplete life and it feels like it lacks the “magnitude”. plus, his life was not all “embellished”, he had a humble beginning as a boy from patna and had to face a lot of “discrimination” in the industry?
Respected Ma'am, I have got an overall concept of such a vast part in the simplest way possible through this video. However, a question kept on nagging me while you were Explaining the parts of a plot. In case of Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff on getting the news of Catherine getting engaged to Edgar runs away from Wuthering Heights. Is it the climax of the novel? OR At the very end Heathcliff agreeing to the marriage of Cathy and Hareton sets the climax of the novel? It would be really helpful if you could reply to this doubt of mine. 🙇
Technically Wuthering Heights is not drama but fiction. But we can use the moment of Heathcliff's sighting of Catherine's spirit as climactic moment after which the storyline gets into falling action.
No, he improvised and changed many of them and created his own conventions while writing his tragedies. I will make a video about this (Shakespeare's tragedies) very soon.
Madam, sometimes after learning minutely about some topic, there are few questions among the students remain unanswered. And sometimes it becomes quite problematic to get and give proper answers through RUclips comments. So mam will you mind if I message you in your wp, as I have arranged your number from your college website, to get the minute and satisfactory answers from the topic your r teaching us in Nibble pop channel?
Thank you for your question Srabanti. For Graduation you need to understand genres like Tragedy, Poetry and Fiction. Important theories include Aristotle's Poetics (his definition of tragedy, mimesis, plot, character), Wordsworth's Preface to Lyrical Ballads (idea of language), Coleridge's theory of Imagination and meter, Eliot's concept of Imagism, Victorian Compromise, Absurd Theatre, Brechtian theatre (basic concept) , Stream of Consciousness technique, colonialism, post colonialism, feminism etc. Understanding theory is good for literature students. But if you study the prescribed texts properly you will automatically understand most of the theories that I have mentioned above. It is more important to relate the theories to the texts.
If the death of Susant Singh Rajput is considered as a suicide, I think it can be reenacted as a tragedy following all the key elements of Aristotelian theory of an ideal tragedy.
In case of plot there will be an Exposition, Rising action, Climax (where Susant, the protagonist will face so many huge personal problems and have mental dilemma with dramatic soliloquies before taking decision of commiting suicide), Falling action i.e perieteia (where the protagonist will see that all his dreams starting with to be a bright star in the sky of film industry and to lead a very happy life is being finished and destroyed gradually/ where the protagonist will face a reversal of his expectations) and also the Denouement i.e catharsis (where with the final resolution, the pity and fear about the protagonist's plight aroused in the hearts of the audience is purged out as they reach a restive psychological stage.)
The enactment of Susant's death will follow the characteristics of Aristotle's ideal concept of tragedy. It will be mimetic (as it will be performed not narrated), serious, lengthy. It will also be the imitation of an action as it may occur in anyone's life. And it must arouse pity and fear among the audience. It will also have hamartia, hubris and anagnorisis.
That is an amazing way to put it Ankan. Thank you so much for this comment.
@@NibblePop Thank you Mam.. waiting for your next video.
@@NibblePop but what about the catharsis? how is that taking place here?
Please make the next video on tragedy.. I learned so many things through your session.. I really appreciate your mode of teaching ..
Very good explanation Ma'am 🎉
Best explanation ever. Thank you so much. 🙏
It's the best videos in the internet
very nice, Proud feeling lecture . Thanks a lot ( From - Mr. Vinod Gadekar .Maharashtra( solapur )
Thankyou so much for such subtle explanation
This is my first video watching and I have understand everything about tragedy from this video and thank you so much Madam
Can't wait for the next video ☺️
Thanks you mam for clearing most of doubts regarding tragedy
Ma'am can you please provide the link to the video where you described in detail about tragic hero , hubris , hamartia , etc. ?
I got exam tomorrow and now I'm here
Same lmao
Ma'am, please make more videos on literary theories....like that of Plato, Horace ,etc. 😊
Ma'am kindly discuss Aristotle's poetics
Very good explanation madam.❤
Hello ma’am, could you please provide the continuation of this topic!
Mam, it was a so helpful class for me.thank you.
Mam you explain so well
I've studied from Kalyani ma'am. Shez just awesome and so you are...
You both are gem..
Thank you ma'am❤️❤️❤️
Thank you mam... 🤗
Simply excellent .
Thank you ma'am😊
Mam thank you so much it helped me a lot 😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤
Pls provide more videos on Poetics Aristotle
The difference between Mimesis and Diegesis is critical to understanding Shakespeare's plays. Not to enjoying them, of course, but to understanding them. For example, Sycorax in The Tempest is never actually shown on stage, being the deposed witch-queen of the island that the witch-king Prospero colonized. So everything we "know" about her is purely from the Diegetic perspective of Prospero and Caliban.
Waiting for next part
Ma'am can you make the 2 nd part of it. I mean you only said that you are gonna cover the rest of the topics like tragic hero, hubris, hamartia etc. So if you can please do us this favour ma'am. 💙😊❤
Thank you ma’am. You’re my saviour ❤️
Thank you mam
I've been preparing for my PhD qualification exam with you, dear professor ❤ you are my intellect idol 😍
All the best
@@NibblePop Happy ending! I passed :)
I do not think SSR’s death as a Tragedy, since the feeling of catharsis is absent, there’s no sense of tranquility in his death because of the mysterious circumstances around it. the state of anxiety and unanswered questions is ever present,hence, no feeling of relief.
our hearts are still disturbed to how and why it led to all of that ending. not to mention he was just 34 y/o at that point, so an incomplete life and it feels like it lacks the “magnitude”. plus, his life was not all “embellished”, he had a humble beginning as a boy from patna and had to face a lot of “discrimination” in the industry?
also, assuming he was mu*dered, he had no choice; no “human action”
Yes i agree
Mam, I do have request to make a video on epic poetry ...
I have a paper tomorrow
Thanks to you I'm saved🙆🏻
Mam could you please upload a video on Structuralism. 😍
Please provide next part of this topic
Not uploaded yet.
Best explanation ever!! 🙂❤️🤌🏻
Mam when will you upload the rest of the topics like tragic hero and other topics??
THANK YOU MA'AM 🥺❤
You are wonderful mam❤
Please make more videos on tragedy ma"am
Ma'am please make a video on Shakespearean Tragedy.
will do soon
When will the next video of tragedy come?
Respected Ma'am, I have got an overall concept of such a vast part in the simplest way possible through this video. However, a question kept on nagging me while you were Explaining the parts of a plot.
In case of Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff on getting the news of Catherine getting engaged to Edgar runs away from Wuthering Heights. Is it the climax of the novel?
OR
At the very end Heathcliff agreeing to the marriage of Cathy and Hareton sets the climax of the novel?
It would be really helpful if you could reply to this doubt of mine.
🙇
Technically Wuthering Heights is not drama but fiction. But we can use the moment of Heathcliff's sighting of Catherine's spirit as climactic moment after which the storyline gets into falling action.
@@NibblePop Certainly Ma'am. Thank you for taking out time and replying
Thank you very much❤mam
Thanks ma'am 🎉
Ma'am please make it's second part 🙃
Thank you ❤
Hello,pls send link to further videos of tragedy like catharsis
awesome
Can you please make videos on Literary terms and types mam
Super mam ❤️
Maam can you please provides the link for rest of the topic
Ma'am can you please explain criticism Dryden and TS Eliot please.....
Ma'am please upload the next video.
Nice video but no video found on the next promised topic in this video
Are we not gonna get a video on Comedy?
And the next part of this video.
Your next promised videos in this video are not found on RUclips.
Where can we get
Anything specific you need?
❤good
Where is the next video??
Mam, did Shakespeare maintain all the Aristotelian concepts of Tragedy while writing his own great tragedies?
No, he improvised and changed many of them and created his own conventions while writing his tragedies. I will make a video about this (Shakespeare's tragedies) very soon.
Maam should we consider audio stories as mimesis?
To some extent yes. If they are dramatised as in shrutinatak or gitikavya.
@@NibblePop Thank you ma'am for clearing my doubt 🙏
Does anyone know where the video on Hamartia is?
Mam where is the link of second part ? Please tell
God to me you are ma'am
Thank You very much ❤
Where's the next part???
Do you provide classes for MA English?
Madam, sometimes after learning minutely about some topic, there are few questions among the students remain unanswered. And sometimes it becomes quite problematic to get and give proper answers through RUclips comments. So mam will you mind if I message you in your wp, as I have arranged your number from your college website, to get the minute and satisfactory answers from the topic your r teaching us in Nibble pop channel?
Trust me I love this video.... Mom you are the best
ম্যাডাম ইংরেজি সাহিত্যের student হিসাবে মূলত কোন কোন theory জানা দরকার?? বিশেষ করে স্নাতক বিভাগের...
Thank you for your question Srabanti.
For Graduation you need to understand genres like Tragedy, Poetry and Fiction. Important theories include Aristotle's Poetics (his definition of tragedy, mimesis, plot, character), Wordsworth's Preface to Lyrical Ballads (idea of language), Coleridge's theory of Imagination and meter, Eliot's concept of Imagism, Victorian Compromise, Absurd Theatre, Brechtian theatre (basic concept) , Stream of Consciousness technique, colonialism, post colonialism, feminism etc.
Understanding theory is good for literature students. But if you study the prescribed texts properly you will automatically understand most of the theories that I have mentioned above. It is more important to relate the theories to the texts.
@@NibblePop ok madam..... And thank you so much...
Ma'am I had a doubt, dramas are non narratives and plays are narratives , then how the plays are considered tragedies according to Aristotle.
Drama is non narrative, it is imitative (mimetic). So it can imitate tragic action
@@NibblePop Thanks for your reply ma'am.
❤
I can't find its next episode
Not yet made
❤❤❤
English❌ Hindi✅