Kinetic Molecular Theory

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 янв 2025

Комментарии • 106

  • @Scp-qh7mt
    @Scp-qh7mt 4 года назад +174

    I couldn’t find an Indian guy explaining this so this was the next best thing

  • @exziteplays0001
    @exziteplays0001 5 лет назад +32

    Wow its very easy method .how smoothly you explain this. Well, thank you so much sir

  • @kerrygrella5249
    @kerrygrella5249 2 года назад +6

    My fellow science teachers are dying for you to make a covalent bond video like your iconic bonding video! You are the BEST resource. Can you make one??

    • @TheScienceClassroom
      @TheScienceClassroom  2 года назад

      Thank you! I'm glad this resource helps.
      Do you mean a video about the Properties of Covalent Compounds like the one called "Properties of Ionic Compounds"?

  • @adishvarcheema5008
    @adishvarcheema5008 5 лет назад +75

    my chemistry test is tommorow and im studying now :(

  • @peterpark8314
    @peterpark8314 6 лет назад +6

    Wow. Amazing video, I understood everything crap. Bruh so good at explaining

  • @nathalianeal9029
    @nathalianeal9029 6 лет назад +7

    my science teacher never explained this tysm

  • @user_name_not_taken_1856
    @user_name_not_taken_1856 4 года назад +25

    Why does my physics teacher always over explain stuff

  • @rosellebautista9026
    @rosellebautista9026 9 месяцев назад

    I really want that Indian guy teaching this it makes my day with his accent. Greetings from Qatar, QATARANTADUHAN HAHAHA

  • @LilJollyJoker
    @LilJollyJoker Год назад +2

    Amazing Video!

  • @illusionparagon9006
    @illusionparagon9006 4 года назад +2

    Kuzgesagt: Existential doom!
    The Science Classroom: It's okay, the Kinetic Molecular Theory is more important.

  • @zyanprince1533
    @zyanprince1533 5 лет назад +1

    Nice and very helpful video

  • @arifiqbal2027
    @arifiqbal2027 6 лет назад +4

    this is really awesome thanks 😉😊🇦🇺

  • @prettythandiiey8828
    @prettythandiiey8828 6 лет назад +2

    Very educating 😊😊

  • @s.m5487
    @s.m5487 4 года назад +1

    This made kinetic theory simple to understand

    • @jamescottrell7147
      @jamescottrell7147 2 года назад

      The 1. & 2. presented are correct. Be careful with KE. Particles can have a low or high KE value. KE is just a value for particle mass and velocity. KE is not the cause of motion. KE is a description or value of mass and velocity. Not a magic energy that cause motion.

  • @hhhsp951
    @hhhsp951 3 года назад +1

    And that's where I'm gonna end today's show remember if you like this video like what I try to do on this channel Make sure to hit that like button if you're new here hit that subscribe button also make sure you got that little bell check so you get a notification When we upload these daily videos which actually if you did miss yesterday's show you wanna catch up click or tap right there to do so Watch that well if you're looking for something more laid back and watch the newest behind the scenes who are BOTS That said of course as always my name is Phillip DeFranco. You've just been Phill'd in hollow phases, and I'll see you tomorrow.

    • @maxwell_isnt_here
      @maxwell_isnt_here 2 года назад

      ?????

    • @jamescottrell7147
      @jamescottrell7147 2 года назад

      The 1. & 2. presented are correct. Be careful with KE. The video about it incorrectly. Particles can have a low or high KE value. KE is just a value for particle mass and velocity. KE is not the cause of motion. KE is a description or value of mass and velocity. Not a magic energy that cause motion.

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +1

    love all the videos helps me to understand

  • @SuperSmoshaddict
    @SuperSmoshaddict 8 лет назад +8

    hello! Your videos are awesome! it really helped me through my exams! Do you take video suggestions by any chance?:)

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +1

    love all the videos helps me to understand better pee coming up 😇

  • @littleeustace4643
    @littleeustace4643 3 года назад

    Sir can I ask an example of activity of man that is related to KINETIC MOLECULAR THEORY and why?

  • @hungry_menace8357
    @hungry_menace8357 7 лет назад +2

    Thank you.

  • @mng5334
    @mng5334 3 года назад +3

    Im having my test 30 mins from now :)

  • @lalitpandat1598
    @lalitpandat1598 6 лет назад

    Good explanation

  • @sheabellamorley6565
    @sheabellamorley6565 6 лет назад +1

    is the pattern of solids also called the lattice pattern 'cause that is what my teachers taught me.

    • @illusionparagon9006
      @illusionparagon9006 4 года назад

      I care so much.

    • @bluuetuts
      @bluuetuts 2 года назад

      @@illusionparagon9006 nobody asked lo

    • @illusionparagon9006
      @illusionparagon9006 2 года назад

      @@bluuetuts whos nobody lmao

    • @bluuetuts
      @bluuetuts 2 года назад

      @@illusionparagon9006 ur father figure

    • @illusionparagon9006
      @illusionparagon9006 2 года назад

      @@bluuetuts D: yea he went to get milk
      also i was kind of a dick 2 years ago forget about this lmao

  • @noraeska1032
    @noraeska1032 7 лет назад +1

    How about the gas or air inside a balloon? Does it or does it not take up any space?

    • @ArtexSniper
      @ArtexSniper 6 лет назад

      ALL REAL gases take up space. However he's not talking about real gases. He's talking about "ideal gases" which is theoretical gases that is much easier to learn. And since the real gases are very complicated ideal gas is the way to start off with. And ideal gases does not take up space. :)

    • @ronanboyle4624
      @ronanboyle4624 6 лет назад

      @@akshitaranaut7790 chill bro\

  • @joansamuels1140
    @joansamuels1140 3 года назад

    Thank you so much

  • @sawsansalah3854
    @sawsansalah3854 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you!

  • @constancezanele8357
    @constancezanele8357 7 лет назад +1

    this is very use fully

  • @rosaleeneyt5185
    @rosaleeneyt5185 6 лет назад +3

    thank you i'm struggling ;-;

  • @jamescottrell7147
    @jamescottrell7147 2 года назад

    Everything I read says, things move because they have kinetic energy. In reality these things only have mass and velocity. The movement of particles is the kinetic energy. Kinetic energy just quantifies the motion and mass of the particles involved. Again, the movement of particles is the only thing that exists. Particles that move faster just have a higher velocity. Particles that move slower just have a lower velocity. The particles don't have a magic energy substance called kinetic energy that makes them move. The particles are only in motion. This motion is quantified or describes as KE, which only represents "mass x velocity^2."
    Particles don't move because they have kinetic energy. Saying "They are moving slowly because they only have a little bit of kinetic energy" is wrong. Rather, "They are moving slowly so the value of their KE is low" would be saying it correctly. Can't we get past the language used before the existence of atoms was proven. I think getting past the idea of "having some magic energy" as a cause is the point of Kinetic Molecular Theory. If you "dumb" something down, don't do it in a way that is the opposite of the main point. There is a value that quantifies the mass and velocity of particles or billiard balls that we call kinetic energy.

  • @creativemind437
    @creativemind437 4 года назад

    Nice

  • @Nkennington16
    @Nkennington16 5 лет назад +2

    wow dis sool cool i nead to look at for homebwork but i no want to i want play forntite

  • @navadeepkumarketha2085
    @navadeepkumarketha2085 7 лет назад

    I like your way of teaching

  • @unitedbrony5907
    @unitedbrony5907 5 лет назад

    whos here because of HBL week ?

  • @trishakangethe9496
    @trishakangethe9496 6 лет назад

    amaizing

  • @jesusbaltazar-lopez1477
    @jesusbaltazar-lopez1477 2 года назад

    i liked vi-deo

  • @amaanqureshi1286
    @amaanqureshi1286 8 лет назад +1

    thanks

  • @jacobfullerton219
    @jacobfullerton219 4 года назад +1

    napsack btw

  • @fuckmyass69
    @fuckmyass69 7 лет назад +2

    Neat

    • @lordvalla
      @lordvalla 6 лет назад

      u watched this too lol

    • @ronanboyle4624
      @ronanboyle4624 6 лет назад

      @@lordvalla well no duh he watched it... o do u know each other... kool

  • @bagsitvictor8759
    @bagsitvictor8759 5 лет назад +2

    pasuhida ko sa imo video kay report nako run AHAHAHAHAHA

  • @billyclarke239
    @billyclarke239 9 лет назад +1

    Yey first comment

  • @solt635
    @solt635 3 года назад

    asta is stronger than yuno

  • @jyl6184
    @jyl6184 8 лет назад +1

    Yey second comment

  • @alessandroayalaaguilar7413
    @alessandroayalaaguilar7413 4 года назад

    Alguien se metio a esto por miss maricela? :v

  • @sanjyanaa1857
    @sanjyanaa1857 2 года назад

    W

  • @blekiscooler
    @blekiscooler 4 года назад

    boaner

  • @dbuc4671
    @dbuc4671 7 лет назад

    latip

  • @sopangarg9153
    @sopangarg9153 5 лет назад

    Oķķkķķķķkk

  • @yslkeem6678
    @yslkeem6678 7 лет назад +1

    bump

  • @jamescottrell7147
    @jamescottrell7147 2 года назад

    Error Error Error. Too bad the liquid model is wrong. Liquids have very little space between the particles. The particles stick together and slide past each others. In other words flow.

    • @TheScienceClassroom
      @TheScienceClassroom  2 года назад

      I'll have to respectfully disagree with you. I'll admit I'm not the best animator. But I think my animation of the liquid fits what you are describing. Maybe you were referring to the animation for the gas?
      I think it's important to remember that models are not exact representations of reality, they are models. All models are erroneous in some way. But it is good practice to critique models when teaching students to develop them and use them. It seems that you are exercising that skill well by trying to find limitations of the model here.
      When using a model with your students, you should always ask, what is good about this model and what is not as good about this model. When using the animation in this video, you might suggest that although the liquid particles are moving more than the solid particles; you'd like to see the liquid particles even closer together than this animation software allowed.
      Hope that helps!

  • @maxparish5183
    @maxparish5183 4 года назад

    nerd

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +1

    love all the videos helps me to understand

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +3

    love all the videos helps me to understand better pee coming up 😇

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +4

    love all the videos helps me to understand better pee coming up 😇

  • @isaacgillett1624
    @isaacgillett1624 6 лет назад +2

    love all the videos helps me to understand better pee coming up 😇