it's interesting how if you watch her more recent "content" she's begun to copy a lot of Nick Fuentes' points (at least not the ones regarding race for the most part as she has a majority black audience) as well as, what is most striking to me, his cadence and mannerisms. Forget ideology, she doesn't even have a personality of her own.
@@jamesthornton3539 from what I can tell yeah, or at the very least it's definitely majority non-white. I saw a pic from a meetup she did in London and the people who showed up were mainly black dudes. Her rhetoric about "submitting" to a man, especially unconditionally doesn't really translate well to most white Westeners with the exception of the very religious. It does appeal to 1st/2nd gen immigrants and blacks though because it's broadly already a part of the former group's culture and there's a lot of bitterness and tension between men and women in the latter group.
Yall give her alot of grace.. Pearl knows her statements are inconsequential.. She can say what she says and know nothing fundamental will change even for her. There is an irony that she Is a busniess woman telling men how women need to be in the home and secondary and the men praise direct hypocrisy. They just say she has come to understand her ways but also building that empire in hotntakes that men who believe woman are the source of their problems. She is a grift in that manner that Tim pool is where he is raging and talking about a revolution from a compound on Twitter saying the election was rig buy my shirts to revolt then when something goes off the rails he can also saying all I meant was go vote and thanks for the subs and donations. She is England talking to Americans about things that wouldn't effect her
2:14 specifically a subset only i feel like it is intentionally more extreme than what people actually think often, it is a progression later of what was there before, an antagonism - due to the earlier antagonism, sort of getting more extreme and alienated '10%'? it is intentionally wrong there is nuance somewhere, that it itself unnuanced- in the past it was more nuanced sometimes
"Half her audience hates her and half her audience pities her". Pure projection. "She panders" with a fatal "Lack of charisma", as you intentionally drone on with semi-audible drivel. You are literally describing yourselves.
I had the pleasure of stumbling on the redscare pod subreddit and became aware of redscare for the first time today. I just had to understand why everyone is so unhinged there and what kind of audience that podcast cultivates. Seriously there is currently a post hating on dogs in that sub. Its baffling and yet i pity them. I have no interest in redscare even after listening to some of it now and still don't know how their audience are the way they are
@cannibalholocaust3015 Yes. I watched the podcast she did with Eric Weinstein a few years ago. They talked about her dad. According to her, her mom is pretty special, too. It works. She's something. I enjoy her.
Seeing so many on the DR fall for this pathetic terminally online thirst trap has been very eye opening. I couldn’t have designed a better psyop against the DR than redscare, whether it is or is not is irrelevant. The effect is the same.
I think Pearl is pretty and actually don't even understand how literally every other human including Pearl thinks she's mid at best. No accounting for taste. But I have no desire to fix her, not least because of her pick-me shite, but because she's the worst type of person: a gunner AND monotonous.
'Half her audience hates her and half her audience pities her because other other half hates her.' What a garbage take. This whole segment was just them talking about her appearance and admittedly not being able to argue with what she says.
that’s the entirety of their podcast. they bring up pop culture, make some unfiltered jokes, and share their opinion. they don’t debate people or try to prove people wrong, they just make observations. they’re the “dirtybag left” and liked by liberals because sometimes people don’t want to debate, they just want to discuss issues without getting combative. you are not getting what you’d see from the men and women on whatever.
they dislike her not because of her views but because she's fucking annoying and charmless, AND most of all she doesn't walk the walk. that's it. if you're looking for debatebro content you're in the wrong place
Everything she says is garbage that she doesn’t even live up to herself and she has no proof of anything because she doesn’t know how to find her own sources without repeating somebody else’s words, even her own family is embarrassed of her. At least half of her watchers are hate watchers 😂
Her talking points are either unsourced or come from cherry picked data. She talks so much and doesn’t keep track of what she says that she ends up contradicting her own statement. Half the internet has taken on her statements.
"Maybe I'm coping. Maybe I'm jealous." Ya think? You have 4180 subscribers. She has 1,500,000. What difference does that make when you are morally superior?
Приколы
Paearly is always talking about "high value men", then you look at the kind of guys she has on her podcast...
They’re all the same. Literally birds of a feather
If you told me pearly is 34 i wouldnt have been surprised
Wait how old is she? Is 34 old? Lol
I like how the one says "whemen"
She pronounces women correctly, unlike brain d3ad GenZ, who pronounce it the same as woman.
Money is the only thing that matters to Ana
She’s a proud Armenian bro, Kim K Killing it
Pearl literally just took talking points from Kevin Samuels (RIP) and made her own podcast show with them.
It hits different when these talking points are voiced by a woman.
I wonder if she killed Kevin
it's interesting how if you watch her more recent "content" she's begun to copy a lot of Nick Fuentes' points (at least not the ones regarding race for the most part as she has a majority black audience) as well as, what is most striking to me, his cadence and mannerisms. Forget ideology, she doesn't even have a personality of her own.
@neverforever4787 her audience is mostly black? The irony lol
@@jamesthornton3539 from what I can tell yeah, or at the very least it's definitely majority non-white. I saw a pic from a meetup she did in London and the people who showed up were mainly black dudes. Her rhetoric about "submitting" to a man, especially unconditionally doesn't really translate well to most white Westeners with the exception of the very religious. It does appeal to 1st/2nd gen immigrants and blacks though because it's broadly already a part of the former group's culture and there's a lot of bitterness and tension between men and women in the latter group.
1:07 Shrek Princess 💀💀
Yall give her alot of grace.. Pearl knows her statements are inconsequential.. She can say what she says and know nothing fundamental will change even for her. There is an irony that she Is a busniess woman telling men how women need to be in the home and secondary and the men praise direct hypocrisy. They just say she has come to understand her ways but also building that empire in hotntakes that men who believe woman are the source of their problems. She is a grift in that manner that Tim pool is where he is raging and talking about a revolution from a compound on Twitter saying the election was rig buy my shirts to revolt then when something goes off the rails he can also saying all I meant was go vote and thanks for the subs and donations. She is England talking to Americans about things that wouldn't effect her
Pearl identifying as “mid” is very generous
It’s not, she’s mid.
She has Dasha trembling
26 is young. I'm 50 and think very differently than I did then
Anna’s most contrarian take
JustPearlyThings is like a Vermeer; Red Scare is like a Hammershoi.
Oooh. Smart reference
Speaking truth to Millennial girls is contentious business.
did she really talk to someone about zionism in some kind of way? I can't find any such moment
Common midshark L
Have they ever had lokteff on?
@@drinkinouttacups2665Lana? Highly doubtful. Not the same sphere at all.
Would love to hear their take on Pearl being demonitized on RUclips
LMAO this is so funny I didn’t know she got demonetized, RENT IS DUE! 😂
7:57 talking about your life is general, there can be various levels of generality, it is not itself bad in certain ways, its a dialogue sometimes
2:14 specifically a subset only
i feel like it is intentionally more extreme than what people actually think often, it is a progression later of what was there before, an antagonism - due to the earlier antagonism, sort of getting more extreme and alienated
'10%'? it is intentionally wrong
there is nuance somewhere, that it itself unnuanced- in the past it was more nuanced sometimes
Getting that paperrrrrr
7:20 it depends, it is not exclusively owmen but it is generally a contradiction
Do an image search of pearl from SpongeBob, she has the same dress... PSYOP!!
clompy mascarra s'gotta be used for somethin.
Dash, who will cure you of saying "like" every other word?
yeah PGL was barely bearable I'm good
4:40 not 100% but some tate element
Fat dasha is risen
"Half her audience hates her and half her audience pities her". Pure projection.
"She panders" with a fatal "Lack of charisma", as you intentionally drone on with semi-audible drivel.
You are literally describing yourselves.
I had the pleasure of stumbling on the redscare pod subreddit and became aware of redscare for the first time today. I just had to understand why everyone is so unhinged there and what kind of audience that podcast cultivates. Seriously there is currently a post hating on dogs in that sub. Its baffling and yet i pity them. I have no interest in redscare even after listening to some of it now and still don't know how their audience are the way they are
Lame
I’m cackling 💀
6:12 wut? not so much
5:29 stereotypically
Dasha is good at playing dumb, like a lot of women who made themselves famous among male audiences.
Anna is so damn smart.
Look up who her dad is, sort of hard to miss even with reversion to mean.
@cannibalholocaust3015 Yes. I watched the podcast she did with Eric Weinstein a few years ago. They talked about her dad. According to her, her mom is pretty special, too. It works. She's something. I enjoy her.
if you think anything she said is particularly smart your standards are fucked lmfao
yeah @@__-bz7wh
me when i lie
she’s the female version of tate, just less irritating, because she is not as prominent
at least Tate is entertaining in a certain way and (albeit unintentionally) funny. Pearl has zero charisma
@@neverforever4787 Who cares?
@@donald347 um, most people who pay any attention to political/ideological figures at all.
yikes @@neverforever4787
@@PaulRinggerJr yikes what?
Is this what redscare is? Why is the dissident right so gay now?
Red scare =/= DR
@@drinkinouttacups2665 But they try to stay palatable to them even though they are basically just liberals.
Seeing so many on the DR fall for this pathetic terminally online thirst trap has been very eye opening. I couldn’t have designed a better psyop against the DR than redscare, whether it is or is not is irrelevant. The effect is the same.
@@raisin1040 Haven't noticed this yet
As a right winger we don’t claim them lol
These harlots make pearl's points truth.
I think Pearl is pretty and actually don't even understand how literally every other human including Pearl thinks she's mid at best. No accounting for taste. But I have no desire to fix her, not least because of her pick-me shite, but because she's the worst type of person: a gunner AND monotonous.
'Half her audience hates her and half her audience pities her because other other half hates her.' What a garbage take. This whole segment was just them talking about her appearance and admittedly not being able to argue with what she says.
that’s the entirety of their podcast. they bring up pop culture, make some unfiltered jokes, and share their opinion. they don’t debate people or try to prove people wrong, they just make observations. they’re the “dirtybag left” and liked by liberals because sometimes people don’t want to debate, they just want to discuss issues without getting combative. you are not getting what you’d see from the men and women on whatever.
they dislike her not because of her views but because she's fucking annoying and charmless, AND most of all she doesn't walk the walk. that's it. if you're looking for debatebro content you're in the wrong place
Everything she says is garbage that she doesn’t even live up to herself and she has no proof of anything because she doesn’t know how to find her own sources without repeating somebody else’s words, even her own family is embarrassed of her. At least half of her watchers are hate watchers 😂
Her talking points are either unsourced or come from cherry picked data. She talks so much and doesn’t keep track of what she says that she ends up contradicting her own statement. Half the internet has taken on her statements.
@@msnewsenior Most of the internet doesnt even know who she is.
Dasha is hotter, but Anna is smarter...
Anna might be hotter and smarter. Sorry Dasha.
I'm with Anna on this one
She’s ‘getting money’? Who tf cares
This was disappointingly petty and meangirlish.
It's pearls sincerity that bothers these two the most
Awful commentary
Didnt women vote against sufferage to avoid bucket duty/the draft?
"Maybe I'm coping. Maybe I'm jealous." Ya think? You have 4180 subscribers. She has 1,500,000. What difference does that make when you are morally superior?
this channel isn't them lmao, it's just a fan channel uploading clips from the podcast.
Yeah relax bro, they ain’t reading ur comment
They make 50,000 a month thats nothing to sneeze at.
Pearl isn’t going to suck you off
She's gorgeous, you pair of bored supply teachers.
Wait people listen to this pod? Pearl is 100x more funny. Adam dodged a missile