The Aesop "Clean Skin" Tourbillon Review - Perth WAtch

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024

Комментарии • 91

  • @ytdavidkwei
    @ytdavidkwei 2 года назад +11

    Yeah! For "ordinary" water lover, $3xx tourbillion is just truly unbelievable great value. I think Seagull also make tourbillion movement. I actually like without brand because the brand doesn't mean anything at all. You did good review and fair and objective. Nice.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      Thanks for that - glad you enjoyed this!

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 3 года назад +7

    I really like it! I'm into astronomy so love the dial. I can see one in my collection in the future for sure.
    Cheers Ivan 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад +2

      Nice - I don’t know if the stars on there even make any sense!

    • @stevefox8605
      @stevefox8605 3 года назад +1

      @@PerthWAtch can't say I recognised any of the constellations, assumed that they were the southern sky. Cheers 👍🏻

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад +2

      I doubt it’d be intended to be southern skies… this is Chinese

  • @alexsdg3441
    @alexsdg3441 3 года назад +3

    Good to see you again, Ivan. I like the watch. Of course, I wouldn't buy one for myself, but it is dirt cheap (for a tourbillon) and doesn't look THAT bad, ha ha. As you said, the band/clasp is "throw-away", but if you put on something nice, it might be a conversational piece :+) Yes, it is a Hangzhou movement (I have seen in many other Chinese Tourbillon watches). however, I like the design of dial layout and clean back side. thanks for the review Ivan and have a wonderful day.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      Thanks for that Alex... it's not the most awesome piece but it's the first tourbillon I can keep, so I will hang on to it until a better one comes along :)

  • @joeblackwolf17
    @joeblackwolf17 2 года назад +4

    Man I really appreciate your reviews … literally went down the rabbit hole and arrived to this tourbillon and the Sugess tourbillon ones as well …so thank you for the content this is super helpful !! ✌️ from 🇨🇦

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      That’s awesome man - most welcome. So will you be getting this or the Sugess one?

    • @joeblackwolf17
      @joeblackwolf17 2 года назад +2

      @@PerthWAtch I went with the Sugess one that’s very similar to this one :) thanks for the info’s review. Let’s wait and see how the Sugess experience goes …

    • @charlieryan531
      @charlieryan531 2 года назад

      @@joeblackwolf17 which one and how did it go? I'm going to pull the trigger on one very soon. Aesop, merker (typo?) or yours.

    • @joeblackwolf17
      @joeblackwolf17 2 года назад

      @@charlieryan531 I ended up getting 2 Sugess chronos and they work really well. I got the 1963 and the Chrono Heritage SUPAN002GN/SN V3 which is a beauty. I am still looking to get the Suearth as my first tourbillon from Sugess. Haven’t ordered that one yet. The 2 I got are really nice (both 38mm) from the Sugess website. Ended up changing my mind last second and got 2 chronos but I still want to get the SUearth tourbillon

    • @charlieryan531
      @charlieryan531 Год назад +1

      @@joeblackwolf17 I went for it and it hasn't disappointed. Good weight and size. At first I thought the sparkle was too much but it's only from one particular angle. Really is a beauty and the watch strap is clearly an improvement from previous reviews. For now it's fine. Went all black and pleased I did. I think steel would make it too bling. The black brings the watch to the right level of starry. If you're still considering it. It's a safe buy but it really does sparkle a lot more than pics or vids on YT etc can show. Hope this finds you and yours well, cheers.

  • @WesWatchRoom
    @WesWatchRoom 3 года назад +4

    Great work with the review, absolutely love that dial. But is it just me or does the tourbillion not sit right in the middle of the dial?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад +3

      Thanks - yes it's not in the middle, it's actually at the bottom :D

  • @mrbookends
    @mrbookends 2 года назад +6

    Great review! For my money I would rather pay an extra $150 (or so) for a flying tourbillion with a weighted balance wheel from Sugess/Seagull - don't get me wrong, the coaxial tourbillion as shown here is nice, but if I'm going full Chinese, I'm going FULL CHINESE!

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад +1

      Haha nicely put!

    • @ohsoleohmio
      @ohsoleohmio 2 года назад

      it is a flying toubillion as in the whole thing is rotating

    • @shadmanhasan6047
      @shadmanhasan6047 Год назад

      Can you kindly give a specific name?

  • @mikehoward9912
    @mikehoward9912 2 года назад +1

    Another great review. I got mine for $265 at the 11/11 sale

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      Oh wow great price! Does make you wonder what their margins really are!!

  • @watchalot919
    @watchalot919 3 года назад +2

    I have always fancied a tourbillon, but not that one. I don't like the dial, the size, or the strap. For the expected cost the movement is fine though. It's £252 on Ali express, which is $348 USD

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      Yeah I agree, the dial is a bit meh... but what about the size? Do these come smaller?

  • @memesofconcord1
    @memesofconcord1 2 года назад +1

    Awesome! How is this watch still holding up after 3 months?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      Holds up fine but you really shouldn’t be asking a watch reviewer about their own experiences of longer term durability

  • @francisng341
    @francisng341 3 года назад

    love the watch especially PTS3000 movement...i wonder need to send back to china for service? or not plan for service at all? i got a sugess tourbillon manual wind seagull movement...not sure where can get it service...not staying in china too...great review!!!!!

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      I think you would plan not to service it…

  • @Alan-zy2kp
    @Alan-zy2kp Год назад

    Glad to be here! 🙏🏼

  • @dude28405
    @dude28405 3 года назад +2

    Are you sure they didn’t provide the bag to improve the spin ability of the box?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад +1

      Good point - they didn't explicitly stipulate this so I chose not to spin in bag ;)

  • @mhossain2677
    @mhossain2677 2 года назад

    Hey, great review! How is the watch running after a year?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      I don’t wear any watch much, but it still works fine

  • @alexisp.7115
    @alexisp.7115 2 года назад

    I’ve never seen someone spin the box and talk about “spinability” hahaha I had a good laugh about that. Great review though! Thanks

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      That’s coz I invented and patented the spinability rating ;)

  • @3rdstone1
    @3rdstone1 3 года назад +1

    Great review as usual. Quite a big boy for a dress watch. 52mm L2L is really big for a dress watch, but since the spring bars sits a bit within the end of the lugs it still could wear decently even on broomstick wrists like me, even though the case would look very big. I really like how the lugs curves down, it's both aesthetic and cleverly practical. And the over all proportions with case, lugs and crown are well balanced IMO albeit over sized for me lol.
    I understand that tourbillon displays needs to expose as much as possible of that cool machinery, but it certainly dominates the whole damn dial here. I mean, the center of the friggin' hands had to be moved above middle due to that thingy. Personally I'd prefer a slightly smaller tourbillon display (if possible?). I also think it's a quite generic design wise over all (dial etc), like you mentioned. But it's still fascinating that it's now possible to get these type of movements for these price ranges. The question of service etc will always be an issue in the future lol. Thanks for sharing, and keep up the good work.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад +1

      Thanks for the comment mate!
      The configuration where the hands sit is more a limitation of the movement rather than the manufacturing of this watch I think... if they want to make a case where the hands are centred, it would be even larger! As for smaller tourbillon... again a limitation of the movement. I guess one would somehow make the aperture smaller but that would partly defeat the purpose :)

  • @watchsixto
    @watchsixto 3 года назад +2

    That is a stunning watch Ivan look great 👍

  • @jamessmith6402
    @jamessmith6402 3 года назад +1

    I love it thanks Ivan good review

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      Thanks James - most welcome :)

  • @toughguy2186
    @toughguy2186 11 месяцев назад

    Looks magnificent, I’m just wondering when are the watchmakers going to realize that buyer wants the watch 40 mm or under ?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  11 месяцев назад

      Haha, yes, good question! Let me know when you find out :)

  • @guymerola1033
    @guymerola1033 2 года назад

    Didn't I see a version of this where the dial sparkles? I thought it was made of some kind of quartz material....was very cool because it looked like twinkling stars.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад +1

      Probably just a sparkly sticker. Or could be the proper sparkly material called aventurine.

  • @putnamehereholdmadoodle
    @putnamehereholdmadoodle Год назад

    Would you still recommend this watch. Looking at buying one for 400 aud.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  Год назад

      400AUD is ok

    • @putnamehereholdmadoodle
      @putnamehereholdmadoodle Год назад

      @PerthWAtch thanks for the response, I might just get a bulova instead maybe. It wouldn't be as noisy.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  Год назад

      That is very true!

  • @Steven9675
    @Steven9675 2 года назад +1

    Would the torbillon not need to move on three axis to do what it is purported to do?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      Yep. These don’t really do the trick anymore - original idea was conceived for pocket watches which spend almost all the time vertical when carried.

    • @UNSCPILOT
      @UNSCPILOT 2 года назад +1

      Well, this is "just" a regular tourbillon, gyro-tourbillons cost an order of magnitude more and don't seem to have affordable copies yet

  • @willgordon5737
    @willgordon5737 2 года назад

    I remember just couple of years ago cheapest tourbillion was like $1500

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      A couple of years ago? I don't think so...

  • @oxfamshop
    @oxfamshop Год назад

    Thanks to youtbe that is going to be world famous

  • @philspencelayh5464
    @philspencelayh5464 3 года назад

    Something different again which is good. Tourbillon interesting to watch for 5 minutes then, whats it there for? No need on a wristwatch, just more to go wrong. Strap doesn't look good but I think it would look wrong on a bracelet, maybe a milanese.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      It’s there for showing of watchmaking virtuosity of course :)
      I think a dress style watch like this belongs on leather… but the one it came on was just average. Can easily find much better!

  • @michaeldor5778
    @michaeldor5778 Год назад

    Hi there,
    Please send me the link to the site with the best price for that watch, if you will have time for that.
    Thanks,
    Michael

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  Год назад

      Check out my links in description :)

  • @willgordon5737
    @willgordon5737 2 года назад

    Maybe warranty works by scanning the QR code

  • @propblast82nd
    @propblast82nd 3 года назад +1

    Fun video, thanks again !

  • @RideLow883-fk9gv
    @RideLow883-fk9gv Месяц назад +1

  • @Ricoroso
    @Ricoroso Год назад

    I just noticed a mistake on the number 4, is written IIII instead of IV.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  Год назад

      Not a mistake - it’s very common to do that on watch dials

  • @fatdave4582
    @fatdave4582 2 года назад

    You can get this exact watch for $200 on Ali express

  • @UGA.D
    @UGA.D 3 года назад +2

    That watch has been "fabled" to be decent. HAHA. Aesop. Fable. HAHAHA... haha... ha.
    I'll show myself out.

  • @pablorages1241
    @pablorages1241 3 года назад

    The applied numerals don't look as if they are lined up correctly ... though I'm not really a tourbillon fan anywhy !

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      I think that's coz it's an asymmetric dial?

  • @mattys1467
    @mattys1467 3 года назад

    Is it a true tourbillon?

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      What do you think?
      What is true and false?

    • @ivanbcanada6454
      @ivanbcanada6454 3 года назад +1

      @@PerthWAtch he's referring to those watches that claim "tourbillon" but are just open heart dial.

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  3 года назад

      Never seen one… usually they use terms like “tourbillon effect” or “simulated tourbillon”

    • @boga92
      @boga92 2 года назад +2

      I think is a Hangzhou PTS 3300 movement. I'm receiving my Aesop this week. 326€

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад +1

      Nice, thanks!!

  • @willgordon5737
    @willgordon5737 2 года назад

    Great job China

  • @fatdave4582
    @fatdave4582 2 года назад

    Sorry 300

    • @PerthWAtch
      @PerthWAtch  2 года назад

      Is that the movie about the Spartans?

    • @fatdave4582
      @fatdave4582 2 года назад

      @@PerthWAtch lol 😂 yeah and also the correct price on aliexpress

  • @mickeyromeo
    @mickeyromeo 2 года назад

    wtf is Aesop lol