Understanding LA's Measure HLA
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 фев 2024
- Voters will soon decide on Measure HLA, which would require the city to redesign hundreds of miles of streets as part of an effort to make them safer for pedestrians and cyclists. Campaign manager Michael Schneider joined FOX 11 to explain why HLA is the answer.
Subscribe to FOX 11 on RUclips: / @foxla
Watch more FOX 11 on RUclips:
Police Chases: • Police Chases
Brazen Crime: • Brazen Crime
Homeless Crisis: • Homeless Crisis
Imagine being against this
I'll never understand those who are against it
@@soaringstars314like seriously, HLA never touches the general fund which deals with homeless encampment clearings and street cleanups to name a few
Dude's really done his homework
HLA would just require the city to carry out the 2015 mobility plan that they already agreed to but have been ignoring. And it does so in the most cost efficient way possible. If a street needs resurfacing, they would need to update it in accordance to the 2015 mobility plan. I constantly feel afraid while crossing streets around my home in LA. It doesn't need to be like this, and HLA would help.
Same!!!
Measure HLA in Los Angeles is an intriguing initiative that reflects the community's commitment to addressing some of its most pressing issues. By focusing on local challenges and seeking solutions through measures like HLA, LA demonstrates the power of collective action and local governance in making significant, positive changes. It’s inspiring to see communities come together to support initiatives that aim to improve the quality of life for everyone. This kind of engagement highlights the importance of being informed and involved in local affairs, as the outcomes directly affect the community and its residents. It's a great reminder of the impact that informed voting and civic participation can have on shaping the future of our neighborhoods and cities.
Los Angeles' Measure HLA is a significant step toward addressing some of the city's most pressing issues, particularly homelessness and housing insecurity. While I don't have real-time data or the latest updates on its implementation or outcomes, Measure HLA generally aims to provide funding and support for services and programs designed to reduce homelessness. This might include initiatives for affordable housing, mental health services, job training, and other support services aimed at helping individuals and families get back on their feet.
It's truly inspiring to see communities come together to tackle such complex challenges. Measures like HLA highlight the power of collective action and the impact of community-driven solutions. It's a reminder that every effort counts and that together, we can make significant strides in creating a more inclusive and supportive society for everyone. If you're looking into the specifics of Measure HLA, it's a great opportunity to get involved in local efforts and contribute to making a difference in your community.
Measure HLA in Los Angeles represents a significant step towards addressing some of the city's most pressing issues, particularly around homelessness and housing. While I don't have the specific details of Measure HLA at my fingertips, initiatives like these typically aim to fund services and programs that can make a real difference in the lives of many. It's inspiring to see communities come together to support solutions that can lead to meaningful change. Everyone deserves a safe place to call home, and efforts like Measure HLA are crucial in making that a reality for more people. It's a reminder of the power of collective action and the impact it can have on improving the lives of individuals and the community as a whole. Keep staying informed and involved-it's through awareness and engagement that we can continue to make a positive difference in the world around us.
VOTE NO
@@jayedanzy975 You love to run over children huh?
@@jayedanzy975HLA does not touch the general fund which deals with street cleanup and homeless encampment clearouts
You shouldn't be allowed to completely ANNIHILATE an argument like that on public television. Traci Park has a family!!!!
YES ON HLA!!!!!
Vote No!
@@ITSFULLOFSTARS1 "vote no to kill more children!"
@@handsfortoothpickspure facts
@@ITSFULLOFSTARS1 I bet you want to see children gone like that
@@soaringstars314 The children are smarter than their parents.
Los Angeles' Measure HLA represents a significant step towards addressing some of the city's most pressing issues, focusing on homelessness and housing challenges. The initiative highlights the community's commitment to finding solutions and providing support for those in need. It's inspiring to see such efforts to create positive change and improve the quality of life for all residents. The collective action embodied in Measure HLA can serve as a model for other cities facing similar challenges, demonstrating the power of community involvement and the impact of comprehensive policy measures. Your interest in understanding and potentially supporting such initiatives is commendable and plays a crucial role in fostering a more inclusive and supportive society.
Los Angeles' Measure HLA is an initiative that reflects the city's commitment to tackling one of its most pressing issues: homelessness. Without knowing the specifics of the measure as it stands today, generally, such measures are designed to create or enhance services and resources for the homeless population. This can include funding for affordable housing, mental health services, job training, and support services that address the root causes of homelessness.
It's truly heartening to see communities come together to support initiatives like Measure HLA. Addressing homelessness with compassion and comprehensive strategies shows a collective dedication to improving lives and making cities more inclusive for everyone. By focusing on long-term solutions and support, LA is taking important steps towards creating a brighter future for all its residents. It's a reminder of the power of community action and the importance of civic engagement in shaping the cities we live in.
I'd argue that there is a gigantic gap between the ideals and vision of such initiatives and the actual reality of the results of the administration of various initiatives. I've witnessed, personally experienced the the overall consequences of them, and anyone who's interested beyond the grandiose promises and vision for the better, with some effort would likely not find much difficulty to agree with me.
That they have been abject failures, that at best made very little if any improvements, and at worst exploited the most vulnerable, shameful waste and the overall benefit of the majority of appropriated taxpayer funding, going to those other than the primary target groups it was intended for.
with the current all time high number of homeless in our state in relation to the billions appropriated to "help", roughly calculates to be just under $200k spent per each homeless individual. If we had given each person the funds directly, IMHO at worst the vast majority of them would be off the streets anywhere between 5 to 8yrs minimum. At best and my personal faith in others hase believe a significant number would rebuild their lives to never return to the unfortunate misery they were once trapped in. Yet about a little more than a month earlier, city officials were patting themselves on the back for getting a tiny number( in relation to the nearly 200k currently on the streets) people permanent housing. That's the sad reality some people seemingly just don't realize or completely ignore IMHO.
@@Nate-dh4uj have you ever left the US before?
@@jbudlo2 @jbudlo2 LOL, ummm ya I would say I've done my share of overseas travel as well as a decent amount of domestic(still around a dozen states I have yet to visit though). I'm sure there's some sort of relevance with an assumption I may or may not have been outside of the US and the topic of this news report. I'm interested in what it is you've got lined up related to my response, and I'm all ears and open to discussion👍
Pertaining to the "estimate cost over 10yrs to be over $3billion" alledgedly politicized, and that it will "actually" be 1/10th of that....... I'm curious to know what exactly is the overall record of projects proposed, approved, and funded in Los Angeles or better yet the entire state? That have and have not cost at or below what was initially projected, as well as fully completed as scheduled???
Just from my vague and likely incorrect memory of various project undertakings, Im leaning towards the thought that its a pretty miserable record. I could be likely mistaken as I said, and it would be revealing to know for sure.
I'm not sure what projects you are talking about specifically but it's likely not going to be related to routine street maintenance, repaving, or redesign.
He mentions first responders can use bus lanes. Bus lanes are already being used by people who want to pass you up, or speed ahead of everybody else. I see kids/teens on bikes purposely not using the bike lanes, swerving in an out of traffic and doing tricks. People parking in emergency lanes to go get their fast food. Basically, from someone who grew up in L.A., everything people wouldn't do because you'd be cited for doing it. Sadly, I just see a lot of really bad driving, road bullies, pitch dark tainted windows, entitlement (including pedestrians), and cops who look the other way. I think our problems run much deeper and am not sure this measure will help protect people. I fear for law abiding bike riders, pedestrians, and drivers, but don't know how we can protect ourselves from the lawless and careless. What exactly does this measure do, build more bike lanes? I pass by Figueroa by USC on my daily commute. That has bike lanes, and I still don't feel save there even as a driver.
I bet all the people who hit me with their car while walking and biking in LA will vote no on this.
VOTE YES!
Especially the lifted truck drivers
Vote YES on HLA if you want safer streets for your kids, parents, friends, neighbors,… pretty simple.
Vote yes if you want reduced driving lanes even though california drivers pay hundreds every year and traffic to get worse
Most of the funding comes from federal taxes. We all pay for it :).
And giving more space, safety, and access to other modes means fewer drivers, and therefore less traffic. The plan also includes a vehicular enhancements network that aims at improving certain streets solely for drivers. Lucky you!
@@Innawor1d you aren't stuck in traffic....YOU ARE THE TRAFFIC.
I'm voting NO
Please dont
It passed by a huge margin.
Another kick back for the corrupted policy
Voting no this HLA! It isn’t going to solve anything, it’s just gonna cause more congestion. Taking up car lanes for bike lanes is stupid.
So anyone who doesn't drive (children, the disabled, the elderly) can be killed by people like you? No thanks.
If LA is going to continue to add residents we can't keep adding lanes to roads.
You do know that right sweetie?
"it’s just gonna cause more congestion"
Do you think making more lanes is a good idea?
"Taking up car lanes for bike lanes is stupid."
How? It can literally save lives.
The only argument I hear against HLA is that “it’ll cause more congestion” and “it’s stupid.” What’s your solution to congestion? Build more lanes by destroying existing homes and businesses?
Two third of the population is either overweight or obscene. They should feel safe to park their metal cages and walk or bike to their destination.
No
NO on HLA! Who do you trust more Michael Schneider or LA Firefighters Union and their members? We don't want the city of LA surrounded by a ocean of gridlock traffic--just like similar reforms created in downtown Culver City. VOTE NO on HLA!
" LA Firefighters Union and their members?"
Their pockets are lined with the money and blood of oil and car companies
"-just like similar reforms created in downtown Culver City."
???? Culver City traffic isn't that bad lol
You people are crazy. This is the most modest proposal to slightly increase pedestrian safety
@@handsfortoothpicks omg you're speaking facts. There is no reason why car companies would just stand there and do nothing about it. There is 100% some shady stuff going on there. In fact bureaucracies like them aren't even supposed to take a stance hence why they used firefighters. I hope there is some investigation because car companies are too powerful so they'll probably take more action against us later on
@@duderdude4831 they're probably bots or brainwashed beyond saving or worse car company lobbyists
🤣 Los Angeles eliminating more traffic lanes? I thought traffic was already horrible? 😂
Less lanes means less traffic. If you got out of your cave more often you'd learn that it's a proven concept in cities around the world
@@cemdursun yeah, empty bike lanes. Surre, makes a lot of sense 👍🏼
@@jaycalif8240 Bike lanes are empty because bikers get killed all the f*cking time. Once this is implemented there will be less of that and more bikes on the roads. I get it, you are dense but still trying to get it in your head here. Do your own research and learn that this will actually decrease traffic density. Look at any major city in the world
@@cemdursun Keep drinking the Kool-aide 👍🏼 Must be some good sh!t
@@jaycalif8240 Man I know so many dumbos like you so I don't know what I was thinking trying to explain anything to you. Yeah right kool-aid okay go on now