Best Lenses for Pet Photography

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 дек 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @b7730
    @b7730 3 месяца назад +3

    The 135mm perspective is always so special. One thing to remember is, that you can get the "same" look with any 135mm lens (from any manufacturer) but you won´t get the same autofocus performance. Static shots are no problem but e.g. shots of a running dog (or any moving subject) are usually achieved only with the higher end, and more expensive lenses. That Sony 85mm 1.8 is really, really good for the price.

    • @heathermtaylor7683
      @heathermtaylor7683 3 месяца назад

      Absolutely correct. Nikon bodies certainly don't respond well with third party lenses when shooting with Auto-Focus and using the AF back button - definitely something to bear in mind.

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад

      @@b7730 yep for sure. I don’t like going specifically into one brand or another because so many camera brands have different lens models that work or need adapters etc so was avoiding opening that Pandora’s box 😅

  • @PhilSledge
    @PhilSledge 3 месяца назад +2

    I agree that primes are generally more affordable than zooms. However, I would recommend starting with the 70-200mm 2.8 lens and gradually expanding your collection. That way, you can build a versatile setup that suits your needs.
    Great video and excellent advie as awlays

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад +1

      @@PhilSledge yes possibly! I had a 70-200 for a while however once I got my 85mm (and afterwards, my 135mm) I never used my 70-200mm again 😂

  • @staceybarrett2019
    @staceybarrett2019 Месяц назад

    I’m just beginning a pet photography business. Your Instagram has been super inspirational, and I’m so happy to find your RUclips videos! Thank you so much for sharing your insights 💜🐾📸

  • @MrSimonj1970
    @MrSimonj1970 3 месяца назад +1

    The Viltrox 85mm f/1.8 is an amazing lens for a very cheap price! I got a used one for £250 and it's 95% as good as the Nikon version that costs a lot more.

  • @rennhor
    @rennhor 3 месяца назад

    Recently my cousin lent me his 70-200mm f4 lens. Having been only using 35 and 50 in the studio, the 70-200 allows me to take pictures outdoors for a better shot. I wish I could get a 2.8 or 1.8 in the future, as I do struggle with ISO with the f4 having to push it up to 3200-6400, but it's still nice having a 70-200 to play with.

  • @TheWescombe
    @TheWescombe 3 месяца назад

    Love the images, but what about DOF with f1.8, how much of the dog is in focus?

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад

      @@TheWescombe how long is a piece of string 😉 if I’m far away, all of the dog will be in focus. If I’m doing head and shoulders, then probably just the eyes. Which is fine by me. I don’t care if the nose is out of focus. That isn’t where I want my audience to look 😉

  • @roman_the_rescuer
    @roman_the_rescuer 3 месяца назад

    Ive used a canon eos rebel t18, and honestly, ive got some really good photos off of it. editing makes a HUGE difference tho.👍🏻

  • @timtog
    @timtog 3 месяца назад

    What the 135 like if you want to catch a fast moving dog. I am looking at the Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 G Master OSS II or the Sony 135

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад +1

      @@timtog the 135mm is an extremely fast lens! The 70-200 ii is also great. I know Chris van riel who is a friend of mine & action photographer who has been doing a series of webinars thru my site, uses the 135mm rather than a 70-200mm. So the 135mm is definitely a great lens for action if you can be close enough (it’s not ideal for agility or disc etc necessarily as you’re a bit too far away, but then even 200mm can be a bit short in that case!)

  • @adrianfaulkner1353
    @adrianfaulkner1353 3 месяца назад

    I have the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN for my dog photography business I would love the sony 135mm but I feel like it could be restricted because it's too long of a focul length I'm just not sure but the sigma is very sharp👍

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад +1

      I think the Sigma is sharp! It's slower than the Sony so not great for action photos but for portraits it's perfectly fine. You could look into renting a 135mm to see if the focal length is for you!

  • @RohanGillett
    @RohanGillett 2 месяца назад

    It would be really helpful if you time-stamped your videos. Then we could skip to what we need rather than watch everything (which can be a waste of time).

  • @heathermtaylor7683
    @heathermtaylor7683 3 месяца назад

    What you say about the camera body and the lens is absolutely right. I use a Nikon D3 (2007 ancient lump: £300 second hand) with the latest Nikon 70mm-200mm F2.8E FL ED VR2 (£2,000). Absolutely stunning lens and very, very fast with beautiful bokeh.

    • @InspawrationPhotography
      @InspawrationPhotography  3 месяца назад +1

      It's crazy right?! I think camera companies do such a good job marketing cameras, and encouraging people to get new cameras, when what people should be putting their attention toward (more often than not) is a better lens! NOT a new camera with another kit lens!

    • @heathermtaylor7683
      @heathermtaylor7683 3 месяца назад

      @@InspawrationPhotography - Could not agree more. The D3 has its limitations being a 2007 body but with the newest and best 70mm-200mm lens it shines.
      Another great video and I am so pleased you have highlighted the importance of good quality lenses over the newest, latest camera body. Thank you 😊