she unironically would vote for a sen il clown who cant finish a sentance who would destroy the country harder in half a year than anyone previously had in their whole term (which what a surprise, he did), over the best president in modern history because he had an ego, should be enough to label her as an r-word. though these people dont seem to care too much about inflation and unemployment rate like a third world country. its almost as if they hat the US... and she is unfledgingly completely on board the AGW cult, probably having nothing against spending tens of trillions of dollars to reduce the output of a gas that has little to no correlation with temperuate and a lot with healthy lifeforms with a couple percentage points in a few decades... of course youcan just create said money by printing some paper notes, so no worries. she and people like her cant engage the core lunacy positions of their cult, like the two i outlined for example. just run and hide.
This is like sitting on a hillside on a sunny day, and two people from the next town over have somehow fashioned wings, like Icarus, and you are watching them flying together. Well done. Both of you. I’m so pleased you were born at the same time, and I’m so pleased I was here to see it.
yes, investigation and thoughtful thinking. that way we can install more "presidents" taken from elder folks homes to stare blankly into cameras unable to finish a sentance so as to clearly signal to china that they can do whatever they want
logic breaks down when mixed with identity, if you are heavily identified with your politics, religion or something like that, intelligence will only serve to protect those ideas you identity is based on.
I'd really enjoy hearing this Scout v Soldier paradigm synthesized/contrasted with the Is v Ought paradigm used to critique modern/enlightenment philosophers from the perspective of the ancients as made by, among others, Leo Strauss. I guess that's because Coleman is able to explain things extremely clearly and I would enjoy his (and his guest's) take on this topic which I think is quite relevant right now.
Watching your presentation before Congress with Coates changed my mind. Your presentation was a bigger factor than my willingness to change mine. I have been a fan ever since. I haven't changed my views of the Manhattan Institute however. They do have an ax to grind and their principle funders do as well.
I just LOVE to listen to two Scouts - JG & CH - conversing. Beyond being educational, efficient, and effective, it's emotional; it feels good and calms me deeply. It's the kind of thing I like to listen to at night. Maybe that's because it sounds a chord of decency amid the general cacophony of daily life, reminds me that harmony between people can and does exist - and that is soothing to me, beyond bedtime stories and music. Hmm... I just imagined some excellent Scout minds I know conversing, and it can also be not pleasant at all. I guess personality also plays into it.
i listened to this on his podcast 2 days ago, so just instaliked when it popped up. maybe other did too or they just like them enough to know they would like it lol
Truth is an idea and is 100% malleable. What was true yesterday may not be true today based on new information or even a simple 1° tweak on perspective. Facts are incontrovertible. They can be used in inaccurate or ill-informed ways maliciously or otherwise to make truth claims and that is why facts are what matter. I often take this argument when people make truth claims in their own lives. I am _____ therefore _____ is my truth. My experience was ______ so due to my experience ______ is my truth. This is all false. Your current perspective on your experiences, observations or identifiable features is what dictates your personal truth. You could change your perspective on those experiences tomorrow and that truth would change with it effortlessly. The facts of a data set done through research or your lived experiences (or whatever the topic) are the "true" foundation. The out comes derived from the data are truths or truth claims and to often confused with FACTS. That's my opinion anyway. I know I'm arguing against my self when it comes to claims about personal "truths" but I will stand behind until more people gain the proper perspective on truth vs fact.
I didn't think the quality was bad at all. Sound seemed fine enough for me and picture quality was good. I don't need everything in super hi def on youtube.
This is interesting because you recently interviewed Noam Chomsky . . . . .who I have been listening to for many decades (and I used to admire and no longer do) and I consider him to be the exemplary archetype of precisely what Galef is warning us not to become . . . he has never modified his views or perspectives and he is clearly so profoundly ideologically driven he cannot do that. When I was much younger, I considered him to be the archetype of a critical thinker. As I matured and revised many of my views in light of evidence and critical reflection, Chomsky morphed for me into precisely the opposite, a rigid highly bias-driven uncritical thinker.
Think more the hardest way of how I honestly speaking up to not be fool by those who managed to look at me, as a person who still attached to weaknesses of human nature... Vs Think more, the more they perceive that way, the more I cannot elaborate to them how it starts and how it ends
I think that it’s always more beneficial to be in a “scout” mindset as it shows you a bigger picture strategically yet allows you to act as a “soldier” for tactical gains. The other way around doesn’t work.
How about being indeterminate in your beliefs? It doesn't mean seeing things clearly, but it means seeing how the truth cane be complicated and even contradictory.
Think more as wise as how I chased your videoing faces no matter in whose RUclips channels you appeared either as resource person, interviewer/virtually communicator etc Vs Think more as wise as possible for this is the only way I urged to win a particular argument that I wastedly search for in the last decade
Apologies and admitting you were wrong about something, or admission of ignorance is a generally a very big no-no in professional circles. I am a senior expert in an IT field, and it took me a while to reign in my honest nature of admitting ignorance. Just fake it until you make it. Don't ever highlight your ignorance, and pick your apologies very carefully. Idiots who know how to bullshit and pretend they know about topics are going to get faaaaaar ahead of you otherwise.
Lmaooo someone in the comments said “Galef is the epitome of wholesome.” Simpery is strong with that one. Anyway, what I saw was her OBVIOUSLY flirting with Coleman lol she was BUGGIN 😭 (hope you tapped though, Coleman lol)
Yin/Yang Scout/Soldier We must live on the edge of order and chaos to be able to thrive. But it is not a surprise that human beings historically start from a place of order and peak into the unknown to learn.
Think more the hardest way of how I shouldn't be fool by those who managed to take advantage of me based on how I kindly approached to them, deal with them, focus on them... Vs Think more the hardest way of how I shouldn't be fool like a person who are the reason to let bad things entered in an environment with goodness
Think more the hardest way as wise as possible to fool not by the over openly attitude in human's mindset, that sometime we treated the seriously stuffs as a joke Vs Think more the hardest way as wise as how I shouldn't be fool as a person who agreeingly agreed to laugh at with the stuff that I shouldn't
Think more the hardest way with "eye spectacle" eyes and the medication prescribed power as per examination or testing results... Vs Think more the hardest way with concave/convex lens, retina, myopia, hypermetomia, reflection, refraction before 567 megapixels
My bias is against tribes. Like minded people/hive mentality was a great survival tool thousands of years ago, but it's too easy to convince many that it's raining when it's really sunny and 75. Tribe mentality has mutated into religious (if you ask John McWhorter), cult like mentality. It's doing the opposite of helping.
"Don't ask me that blackmailing ass question" - oh, the emotional blackmail is so strong these days. "We must do X to fix Y!" "Will X actually fix Y?" "DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT Y?!?!?"
It's among the classics of lazy action favoring rhetoric. BTW... Are you familiar with A.O. Hirshman's classic "Rhetoric of Reaction"? It's among the sources I try always try to keep in mind when reflecting on popular appeals. ...Amongst its merits, it starts out, as its' title suggest as a critique of some very common reactionary/conservative rhetoric, but then proceeds to reveal similar weaknesses in common rhetoric of change/progress. ... It's also quite concise, and despite it's examples being dated, the critical observations about the rhetoric seems timeless.
Think more a wise as possible like how I should finished downloading photos before 12:00 AM Vs Think more yet I can't be fool like a Smartphone screen clock timing arranger
The level irrationality in politics and fringe movements is so high now that I've ended up with a soldier mindset about rationality itself. I'm more interested in people who make compelling arguments, anticipate and manage counterarguments, and speak in their own voices than whatever position they're actually taking. Or, as the editor New Scientist put it "Science is interesting and if you don't agree you can fuck off."
Think more as wise as how managed to make you understand what is bad and what is good, what is exceptional and what is unexceptional for me... Vs Think more else who knows what you agreed with others secretly, that may landslidingly eroded our gentle relationship
Think more the hardest way like how I managed not to out-smart when every brainers are smart enough to create their own self made rules... Vs Think more as wise as how I'm real with words, although I can't accomplish with actions
Think more the hardest way to fool not by the pattern that high hierarchy level people managed me to follow accordingly to what they wished for even if I have to suffer and face more devil torment process Vs Think more as wise as possible like how I shouldn't be fool by the possible die-hardly diehard judgeable comment readers
Think more as wise as sleepy eyes me knowingly tried to complete commenting all your videos just like everyday.... Vs Think more the hardest way how not to be fool like I'm a kid enough to not attach to you
Think more the hardest way as human who introduced the existence of God... Vs Think more the hardest way to not be fool by Police against Terrorists compromising people
Does the Scout mind set, on the part of the individual, face any evolutionary headwinds? Does the Soldier mindset enjoy any evolutionary tailwinds? If so, in what settings do these endowments do well and poorly?
Biological evolution by natural selection is about making babies (replication), not finding out what is actually true, what is right or what is optimal for well being.
@@1DangerMouse1 Although staying alive and reasonably healthy is important to having babies (fertility) and being around to raise them so they in turn can reproduce. Suicide is not adaptive, and nor is apathy.
@@1DangerMouse1 But yeah-it’s an incredibly popular misconception that truth is the highest value. The only practical value truth has its utility (by definition). Humans’ rampant cognitive biases and sexual delusions have allowed us to survive.
In complex environments where you can't simply rely on your intuition, I assume. Like forests with lots and lots of poisonous shrooms, tricky illnesses, swamps that will swallow you whole if you're not careful etc. Being reckless, naive or over-confident by being in a soldier mindset in such an environment would be your doom. Not to mention it's virtually impossible to create technological innovations without being in a scout mindset, ie. that of a scientist, constantly falsifying his beliefs. And while innovations are more impactful on a societal level, it's certainly beneficial to the individual to have better tools than everyone else too.
Seems to me at current point in evolutionary history, it's mostly a competition between cultural driven developments and a relatively genetically evolved endowment. (Just not a lot of genetic selection effect unless we again hit some more gruesome differences for mating, breeding, or survival... ) Hard to say where modern environment, plus time, plus a more evolved consciousness, plus some random chance might lead us, but I'm all for trying to probe onward! 😇
Watch Julia's Ted talk on the differences between soldier and scout mindset before watching if you're unfamiliar. Coleman will put many "scouts" off by using the term "conspiracy theorist" early on. He's also a dude so don't get put off.
Think more the hardest way when I know your debatable videos may turn into gamble if you're still trying to make me feel guilty of my honest comments Vs Think more the hardest way of how I know the right thing that I have done so far, for not being dishonest even with one small things that other don't consider as innocent
Think more as wise with since 2020 wasted fence sliced-wood flame along smoke kittle and smoke pot with boiled bath water... Vs Think more the hardest way to not be fool by automatically healthcare awareness for pregnancy women announcement
Think more the hardest way the more you taught me to show my skinny first... Vs Think more the more I didn't appraise your multi-discussion topics on your videos
I presume he's talking about Christopher Langan. The reporting on him seems to be a mixture of reasonable criticism (i.e. he once said gorillas were smarter than Somalis) and Leftist activist ad-hominen (i.e. he used the term "globalists" which, to leftist activist journalists, is only and always a secret code word for "jews").
Think more as eyes from Satellite... Vs Fool not by how I grawl in the community like a Made-up earthly pilgrim for the sake of over Godly businesses community
Think more with one deepest seriously reasonable question I asked from the church deacon today,... Vs Think less how he described me at the time he and his wife had sex and how it processing
Bro, you gotta lay off Owens. We get it. If shes the color red, Coleman is the color purple on the Rainbow of Apathetic Views Of Da Left. Quit name droppin her..
![Propaganda, Misinformation & Woke Math with Renee DiResta [S3 Ep.3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U2HB4wEjoNA/mqdefault.jpg)
I am 60 years in and with all this new information coming to light via msm I’ve become a bit jaded you both give me hope for humanity
Holy shit I want her as a friend! She is articulating everything I’ve been thinking for the past year.
Nice lol
I want her to do asmr videos
lol she is a TDS lunatic
Galef is the epitome of wholesome and embodies her reasoned arguments which she allows herself to evolve. It's a refreshing stance on open mindedness.
I am so heartened by the likes of young (and hopefully increasingly influential) thinkers such as Hughes and Galef.
lol she is a TDS lunatic
she unironically would vote for a sen il clown who cant finish a sentance who would destroy the country harder in half a year than anyone previously had in their whole term (which what a surprise, he did), over the best president in modern history because he had an ego, should be enough to label her as an r-word.
though these people dont seem to care too much about inflation and unemployment rate like a third world country. its almost as if they hat the US...
and she is unfledgingly completely on board the AGW cult, probably having nothing against spending tens of trillions of dollars to reduce the output of a gas that has little to no correlation with temperuate and a lot with healthy lifeforms with a couple percentage points in a few decades...
of course youcan just create said money by printing some paper notes, so no worries.
she and people like her cant engage the core lunacy positions of their cult, like the two i outlined for example. just run and hide.
This is like sitting on a hillside on a sunny day, and two people from the next town over have somehow fashioned wings, like Icarus, and you are watching them flying together.
Well done. Both of you. I’m so pleased you were born at the same time, and I’m so pleased I was here to see it.
Shes fantastic. We need more scout mindset in the world today. Thats for damn sure.
yes, investigation and thoughtful thinking. that way we can install more "presidents" taken from elder folks homes to stare blankly into cameras unable to finish a sentance so as to clearly signal to china that they can do whatever they want
Julia Galef is awesome. I'm glad she popped back up again recently.
JG is very smart and is a person who’s voice actually ‘smiles’...
logic breaks down when mixed with identity, if you are heavily identified with your politics, religion or something like that, intelligence will only serve to protect those ideas you identity is based on.
I'd really enjoy hearing this Scout v Soldier paradigm synthesized/contrasted with the Is v Ought paradigm used to critique modern/enlightenment philosophers from the perspective of the ancients as made by, among others, Leo Strauss. I guess that's because Coleman is able to explain things extremely clearly and I would enjoy his (and his guest's) take on this topic which I think is quite relevant right now.
Galef's book does discuss the "must I believe" versus "might I believe" paradigms.
Incredible guest choice. Ty mr Hughes
"Intelligence is a tool". Insightful. People can have the same level of tools, but use them for completely different concerns.
It's sad this channel doesn't get much traction. Coleman you're a national treasure. I really love what you're doing. Keep it up!
Watching your presentation before Congress with Coates changed my mind. Your presentation was a bigger factor than my willingness to change mine. I have been a fan ever since. I haven't changed my views of the Manhattan Institute however. They do have an ax to grind and their principle funders do as well.
Pleasantly surprised you had Julia on! I've been following her RUclips channel for a while and she's great
This is fabulous. So many clear articulations of my own hard learned habits and opinions
Huge upvote, her book is excellent.
I just LOVE to listen to two Scouts - JG & CH - conversing. Beyond being educational, efficient, and effective, it's emotional; it feels good and calms me deeply. It's the kind of thing I like to listen to at night. Maybe that's because it sounds a chord of decency amid the general cacophony of daily life, reminds me that harmony between people can and does exist - and that is soothing to me, beyond bedtime stories and music. Hmm... I just imagined some excellent Scout minds I know conversing, and it can also be not pleasant at all. I guess personality also plays into it.
Who is thumbing this up before it has started?
Me! Julia gets instant thumbs up!
@@alexandria5758 Fair enough!
@@alexandria5758 Sounds like soldier mindset to me! :)
I always thumb fine ladies
i listened to this on his podcast 2 days ago, so just instaliked when it popped up. maybe other did too or they just like them enough to know they would like it lol
Great program,as one seeks after truth ,it takes time.the young people today are struggling to believe truth ,truth does not change.
Truth is an idea and is 100% malleable. What was true yesterday may not be true today based on new information or even a simple 1° tweak on perspective. Facts are incontrovertible. They can be used in inaccurate or ill-informed ways maliciously or otherwise to make truth claims and that is why facts are what matter. I often take this argument when people make truth claims in their own lives. I am _____ therefore _____ is my truth. My experience was ______ so due to my experience ______ is my truth. This is all false. Your current perspective on your experiences, observations or identifiable features is what dictates your personal truth. You could change your perspective on those experiences tomorrow and that truth would change with it effortlessly. The facts of a data set done through research or your lived experiences (or whatever the topic) are the "true" foundation. The out comes derived from the data are truths or truth claims and to often confused with FACTS. That's my opinion anyway. I know I'm arguing against my self when it comes to claims about personal "truths" but I will stand behind until more people gain the proper perspective on truth vs fact.
I concur with Mike , truth does not change.
Jordan Peterson just had a guy on talking about the two sides of the brain. This dovetails so well with that. Check it out if you can.
I want friends like Coleman and Julia where do I go for that
Julia is amazing
Coleman's point about rational irrationality @34:00 was very insightful.
I didn't think the quality was bad at all. Sound seemed fine enough for me and picture quality was good. I don't need everything in super hi def on youtube.
Galef’s spirit shines.
Why am I third-wheeling!
This is interesting because you recently interviewed Noam Chomsky . . . . .who I have been listening to for many decades (and I used to admire and no longer do) and I consider him to be the exemplary archetype of precisely what Galef is warning us not to become . . . he has never modified his views or perspectives and he is clearly so profoundly ideologically driven he cannot do that. When I was much younger, I considered him to be the archetype of a critical thinker. As I matured and revised many of my views in light of evidence and critical reflection, Chomsky morphed for me into precisely the opposite, a rigid highly bias-driven uncritical thinker.
Think more the hardest way of how I honestly speaking up to not be fool by those who managed to look at me, as a person who still attached to weaknesses of human nature...
Vs
Think more, the more they perceive that way, the more I cannot elaborate to them how it starts and how it ends
I love you Coleman!
Hey Coleman! Big fan of the podcast :) Any chance of getting William MacAskill on?
I think that it’s always more beneficial to be in a “scout” mindset as it shows you a bigger picture strategically yet allows you to act as a “soldier” for tactical gains. The other way around doesn’t work.
So glad you interviewed her. Great episode!
Think more and more and more...
Vs
Think more and more until I hurt no one and no one should hurt me either
How about being indeterminate in your beliefs? It doesn't mean seeing things clearly, but it means seeing how the truth cane be complicated and even contradictory.
The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt explained all of this perfectly
Perfectly? No it didn't.
Think more as wise as how I chased your videoing faces no matter in whose RUclips channels you appeared either as resource person, interviewer/virtually communicator etc
Vs
Think more as wise as possible for this is the only way I urged to win a particular argument that I wastedly search for in the last decade
Apologies and admitting you were wrong about something, or admission of ignorance is a generally a very big no-no in professional circles.
I am a senior expert in an IT field, and it took me a while to reign in my honest nature of admitting ignorance. Just fake it until you make it. Don't ever highlight your ignorance, and pick your apologies very carefully. Idiots who know how to bullshit and pretend they know about topics are going to get faaaaaar ahead of you otherwise.
Lmaooo someone in the comments said “Galef is the epitome of wholesome.” Simpery is strong with that one. Anyway, what I saw was her OBVIOUSLY flirting with Coleman lol she was BUGGIN 😭 (hope you tapped though, Coleman lol)
Damn he goin after all the fine ladies
Yin/Yang
Scout/Soldier
We must live on the edge of order and chaos to be able to thrive.
But it is not a surprise that human beings historically start from a place of order and peak into the unknown to learn.
Think more the hardest way of how I shouldn't be fool by those who managed to take advantage of me based on how I kindly approached to them, deal with them, focus on them...
Vs
Think more the hardest way of how I shouldn't be fool like a person who are the reason to let bad things entered in an environment with goodness
Think more the cautious pointing finger on touchscreen device
Vs
Think more one
Think more the hardest thing to avoid the deep fake...
Vs
Think more it's the easiest thing to avoid every one
Think more as ownership...
Vs
Think more being not kidding in what I do
Think more the hardest way as wise as possible to fool not by the over openly attitude in human's mindset, that sometime we treated the seriously stuffs as a joke
Vs
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I shouldn't be fool as a person who agreeingly agreed to laugh at with the stuff that I shouldn't
Think more the hardest way with "eye spectacle" eyes and the medication prescribed power as per examination or testing results...
Vs
Think more the hardest way with concave/convex lens, retina, myopia, hypermetomia, reflection, refraction before 567 megapixels
The Mira Sorvino of philosophy.
My bias is against tribes. Like minded people/hive mentality was a great survival tool thousands of years ago, but it's too easy to convince many that it's raining when it's really sunny and 75. Tribe mentality has mutated into religious (if you ask John McWhorter), cult like mentality. It's doing the opposite of helping.
Coleman is using his podcast to date all the smart hot girls.
You are projecting!
@Peter Fazio Hittin that untapped market!!!
Does she have an onlyfans though?
Lol
Scout mindset baby!
"Don't ask me that blackmailing ass question" - oh, the emotional blackmail is so strong these days.
"We must do X to fix Y!"
"Will X actually fix Y?"
"DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT Y?!?!?"
It's among the classics of lazy action favoring rhetoric.
BTW... Are you familiar with A.O. Hirshman's classic "Rhetoric of Reaction"?
It's among the sources I try always try to keep in mind when reflecting on popular appeals.
...Amongst its merits, it starts out, as its' title suggest as a critique of some very common reactionary/conservative rhetoric, but then proceeds to reveal similar weaknesses in common rhetoric of change/progress.
... It's also quite concise, and despite it's examples being dated, the critical observations about the rhetoric seems timeless.
She's in love with Coleman ;)
Think more a wise as possible like how I should finished downloading photos before 12:00 AM
Vs
Think more yet I can't be fool like a Smartphone screen clock timing arranger
The level irrationality in politics and fringe movements is so high now that I've ended up with a soldier mindset about rationality itself. I'm more interested in people who make compelling arguments, anticipate and manage counterarguments, and speak in their own voices than whatever position they're actually taking. Or, as the editor New Scientist put it "Science is interesting and if you don't agree you can fuck off."
Think more as wise as how managed to make you understand what is bad and what is good, what is exceptional and what is unexceptional for me...
Vs
Think more else who knows what you agreed with others secretly, that may landslidingly eroded our gentle relationship
The ego can fog a person's perception.
Think more the hardest way like how I managed not to out-smart when every brainers are smart enough to create their own self made rules...
Vs
Think more as wise as how I'm real with words, although I can't accomplish with actions
Think more the hardest way to fool not by the pattern that high hierarchy level people managed me to follow accordingly to what they wished for even if I have to suffer and face more devil torment process
Vs
Think more as wise as possible like how I shouldn't be fool by the possible die-hardly diehard judgeable comment readers
Think more as M is for Mahindra
Vs
Think more as N is for Nokia
I dont know how much you dont know. It's obviously more than I have time to tell you. I wish someone else was me.
Think more the hardest way till 04:43 PM
Vs
Think more the hardest way as brainer among brainers
Think more as wise as sleepy eyes me knowingly tried to complete commenting all your videos just like everyday....
Vs
Think more the hardest way how not to be fool like I'm a kid enough to not attach to you
You guys would make a good couple. :)
Think more the hardest way as human who introduced the existence of God...
Vs
Think more the hardest way to not be fool by Police against Terrorists compromising people
Does the Scout mind set, on the part of the individual, face any evolutionary headwinds? Does the Soldier mindset enjoy any evolutionary tailwinds? If so, in what settings do these endowments do well and poorly?
Biological evolution by natural selection is about making babies (replication), not finding out what is actually true, what is right or what is optimal for well being.
@@1DangerMouse1 Although staying alive and reasonably healthy is important to having babies (fertility) and being around to raise them so they in turn can reproduce. Suicide is not adaptive, and nor is apathy.
@@1DangerMouse1 But yeah-it’s an incredibly popular misconception that truth is the highest value. The only practical value truth has its utility (by definition). Humans’ rampant cognitive biases and sexual delusions have allowed us to survive.
In complex environments where you can't simply rely on your intuition, I assume. Like forests with lots and lots of poisonous shrooms, tricky illnesses, swamps that will swallow you whole if you're not careful etc. Being reckless, naive or over-confident by being in a soldier mindset in such an environment would be your doom.
Not to mention it's virtually impossible to create technological innovations without being in a scout mindset, ie. that of a scientist, constantly falsifying his beliefs. And while innovations are more impactful on a societal level, it's certainly beneficial to the individual to have better tools than everyone else too.
Seems to me at current point in evolutionary history, it's mostly a competition between cultural driven developments and a relatively genetically evolved endowment. (Just not a lot of genetic selection effect unless we again hit some more gruesome differences for mating, breeding, or survival... )
Hard to say where modern environment, plus time, plus a more evolved consciousness, plus some random chance might lead us, but I'm all for trying to probe onward! 😇
Watch Julia's Ted talk on the differences between soldier and scout mindset before watching if you're unfamiliar. Coleman will put many "scouts" off by using the term "conspiracy theorist" early on. He's also a dude so don't get put off.
Think more the hardest way when I know your debatable videos may turn into gamble if you're still trying to make me feel guilty of my honest comments
Vs
Think more the hardest way of how I know the right thing that I have done so far, for not being dishonest even with one small things that other don't consider as innocent
1:32:00
I like to think that if you abandoned any attempt at intellectual honesty, we would wreck you in the comments :)
Think more as wise with since 2020 wasted fence sliced-wood flame along smoke kittle and smoke pot with boiled bath water...
Vs
Think more the hardest way to not be fool by automatically healthcare awareness for pregnancy women announcement
Think more emotionless
Vs
Think less being foolishness
Think more the hardest way the more you taught me to show my skinny first...
Vs
Think more the more I didn't appraise your multi-discussion topics on your videos
Think more to rationalise why the God seeking process of every religions now is a bad idea...
Vs
Think more one woman
Get a room you two, geeze.
Think more doubters
Vs
Think more else your wisdoms are supposed to be entertaining but not approval
his name please, so I can see if he is really a white supremacist imo?
I presume he's talking about Christopher Langan. The reporting on him seems to be a mixture of reasonable criticism (i.e. he once said gorillas were smarter than Somalis) and Leftist activist ad-hominen (i.e. he used the term "globalists" which, to leftist activist journalists, is only and always a secret code word for "jews").
@@mchousewar thank you
Langan was definitely a white supremacist back in the day. My understanding is that he has reformed since then.
@@synchronium24 oh really, what did he do?
Mutual fawn fest. ;)
Right? They need to get a room already 😁
@@gabilurio4270 agreed. the tension is unbearable! 🤣
This is why frequent F*** off, Bu** sh** matters to me...
Vs
Think more instead of Praise God
*invite nntaleb*
Think more as eyes from Satellite...
Vs
Fool not by how I grawl in the community like a Made-up earthly pilgrim for the sake of over Godly businesses community
Think more with one deepest seriously reasonable question I asked from the church deacon today,...
Vs
Think less how he described me at the time he and his wife had sex and how it processing
Still happy with your vote for Biden, Coleman?
what on earth could any humans reasoning ever be for that... and coleman is supposed to not be part of the cult left...
Bro, you gotta lay off Owens. We get it. If shes the color red, Coleman is the color purple on the Rainbow of Apathetic Views Of Da Left.
Quit name droppin her..
What a shame everything is out of focus.
Not everything
Their minds are focused
Thank you for stating the obvious, it would have been interesting if I was younger.
And your shitty comment would have been interesting if you were younger.