Japan has a large amount of automotive parts supply chain and local auto manufacturing industry to protect. Japanese don't like fast changes and to switch suddenly to evs which use fewer parts and different parts it will put lots of Japanese workers out of a job and many of these workers I'm guessing are older. They like to pump the hybrid vehicle narrative because hybrid's still uses all the same parts as traditional cars just with addition of a big battery. Engine parts and all the rest. Even if the Japanese can go electric they can't because they have to protect a whole generation of automotive jobs in their nation, and Japan is barely hanging in there economically already.
TB, it is as clear as crystal that legacy automakers, especially the world No.1 Toyota, have lobbied strongly against zero emission target as they keep pushing back the years from 2030 to 2035 and then eventually to 2050. The goal post is being shifted all the time. But they know clearly that their time is up. EVs will decimate their business.
This is common knowledge.Different naming conventions have been derived in view of different emerging technologies. Intentionally or not, most consumers are aware if the vehicle contains engine or no engine such as BEV etc.
Good day Mr tan, HEV stands for hybrid electric vehicle, so the Prius is still a hybrid, it's not intentionally deceiving the people. They could be consolidating the naming system like BEV, HEV, PHEV etc.
Mr TB could you share with us your opinion how our government to improve and enhance our education system by taking into consideration of our existing political climate. 人才是一个先进，发达国家不可或缺的资本。。。 期待您的高见。。。。😊
The hydrogen filling station is many times the investment of petrol station which in turn also cost more than EV charging station. Even though it takes more or less the time filling up petrol the hydrogen filing itself presents lost of logistic (transportation of H2 gas) the freezing of nozzles (the H2 gas has to kept at below freezing point) so the filling cannot be done car after car like petrol - constant heating of the nozzle to prevent the nozzle being stuck to the car. Meaning in theory it probable takes annual hour for 10 cars would turn out to be half a day to unstuck or unfreeze the nozzle. Not to mention the great inefficiency of the fuel around 30-40% conversion to energy. Firstly need electricity to convert to H2 from water or any other source then energy requires for transportation then the H2 also losses energy before transforming into energy whereas the electrify or battery to energy is almost 100%
Most traditional ICE auto brand like Toyota are really irresponsible and will end up being decimated by EV. Japanese have fail to innovate in the age of new technology in their auto industry. They are very far behind in EV technology.
Why do you not explain then why the japanese automakers are not into EV? Instead of painting them as the villian here, please research also on "why" the japanese is against EV.
Before the Chinese successes in EV hit them, they (Western, especially, the US) believed that they have the competitive advantage in green energy technology. The simple explanation is; they are now changing their tune because they lost to China on this technology.
If they were really serious they would put in the required effort to put in the infrastructure for hydrogen filling stations and also install them in all the markets they intend to sell these hydrogen cars. They don't, so it's a fail. All you have to do is look at China's NIOs efforts to install a nationwide battery swapping station network. It's amazing, and no doubt if Toyota wanted to they could do something similar to NIO but they won't. 👎
Is Toyota or the Japanese government investing in Hydrogen distribution networks? If even within Japan they are not investing heavily in building Hydrogen distribution networks, how are they going to sell Hydrogen cars to other countries?
@@adamiskandar5107 I'm pretty sure in Japan they are putting in the networks for themselves but in the US where they're also selling their hydrogen cars there's hardly any stations. Maybe a handful for every major metro area. I don't know how they can expect mass adoption without a good filling station network.
The hydrogen filling station is many times the investment of petrol station which in turn also cost more than EV charging station. Even though it takes more or less the time filling up petrol the hydrogen filing itself presents lost of logistic (transportation of H2 gas) the freezing of nozzles (the H2 gas has to kept at below freezing point) so the filling cannot be done car after car like petrol - constant heating of the nozzle to prevent the nozzle being stuck to the car. Meaning in theory it probable takes annual hour for 10 cars would turn out to be half a day to unstuck or unfreeze the nozzle. Not to mention the great inefficiency of the fuel around 30-40% conversion to energy. Firstly need electricity to convert to H2 from water or any other source then energy requires for transportation then the H2 also losses energy before transforming into energy whereas the electrify or battery to energy is almost 100%
I think no sabotage done by legacy auto makers. Owning a full EV is problematic. Charging takes a long time. Plus no world standard in charging station. All auto makers have their own system which are not compatible with its competitors. Plus battery technology have not reached its optimum capability. The moment a new battery is introduce, the older EV loses its value. Toyota is almost fully hybrid. It was the first to introduce hybrid decades ago. Using hybrid reduces usage of petrol by a significant margin.
I previously owned first Prius and later Camry hybrid. The saving in petrol was certainly much less than claimed officially especially the Camry hybrid. Firstly the vehicle is heavier due to the extra battery weight plus the petrol engine weight. Then you need to charge the battery using the petrol engine before you can power the car using the electric motor. In other words you don’t save any petrol if you are doing short trips as you are burning more petrol at the beginning of the journey. Thus, one only get the better mileage and saving on petrol if you are making longer trips like driving long distances or outstation.
@adamiskandar5107 have you sat in byd before. Can't compare with tesla man. The quality the sound proof, the suspension. U can feel the difference in terms of quality. Take a drove.
Japan has a large amount of automotive parts supply chain and local auto manufacturing industry to protect. Japanese don't like fast changes and to switch suddenly to evs which use fewer parts and different parts it will put lots of Japanese workers out of a job and many of these workers I'm guessing are older. They like to pump the hybrid vehicle narrative because hybrid's still uses all the same parts as traditional cars just with addition of a big battery. Engine parts and all the rest. Even if the Japanese can go electric they can't because they have to protect a whole generation of automotive jobs in their nation, and Japan is barely hanging in there economically already.
As a current Toyota car owner , I feel ashamed of their fraud, lobbying against EV, and I promise my next car will be Tesla
TB, it is as clear as crystal that legacy automakers, especially the world No.1 Toyota, have lobbied strongly against zero emission target as they keep pushing back the years from 2030 to 2035 and then eventually to 2050. The goal post is being shifted all the time. But they know clearly that their time is up. EVs will decimate their business.
Toyota sales are rising despite its zero EV.
Thank you Mr Tan
This is common knowledge.Different naming conventions have been derived in view of different emerging technologies. Intentionally or not, most consumers are aware if the vehicle contains engine or no engine such as BEV etc.
Good day Mr tan, HEV stands for hybrid electric vehicle, so the Prius is still a hybrid, it's not intentionally deceiving the people. They could be consolidating the naming system like BEV, HEV, PHEV etc.
Just like a wolf in a sheep skin
Mr TB could you share with us your opinion how our government to improve and enhance our education system by taking into consideration of our existing political climate.
人才是一个先进，发达国家不可或缺的资本。。。
期待您的高见。。。。😊
The hydrogen filling station is many times the investment of petrol station which in turn also cost more than EV charging station. Even though it takes more or less the time filling up petrol the hydrogen filing itself presents lost of logistic (transportation of H2 gas) the freezing of nozzles (the H2 gas has to kept at below freezing point) so the filling cannot be done car after car like petrol - constant heating of the nozzle to prevent the nozzle being stuck to the car. Meaning in theory it probable takes annual hour for 10 cars would turn out to be half a day to unstuck or unfreeze the nozzle. Not to mention the great inefficiency of the fuel around 30-40% conversion to energy. Firstly need electricity to convert to H2 from water or any other source then energy requires for transportation then the H2 also losses energy before transforming into energy whereas the electrify or battery to energy is almost 100%
Great research done on this issue
i need a mini bus connection from my house to the MRT nearby
Any EV, HEV, PHEV car must have the ability to receive or refill electrical energy.
Most traditional ICE auto brand like Toyota are really irresponsible and will end up being decimated by EV. Japanese have fail to innovate in the age of new technology in their auto industry. They are very far behind in EV technology.
Why do you not explain then why the japanese automakers are not into EV?
Instead of painting them as the villian here, please research also on "why" the japanese is against EV.
Before the Chinese successes in EV hit them, they (Western, especially, the US) believed that they have the competitive advantage in green energy technology. The simple explanation is; they are now changing their tune because they lost to China on this technology.
Because he thinks he is smartest guy in Msia. And one of the best investment manager in the whole region.
Toyota is betting on hydrogen as the future source of power. That is why their line up of full battery EVs are lagging behind.
If they were really serious they would put in the required effort to put in the infrastructure for hydrogen filling stations and also install them in all the markets they intend to sell these hydrogen cars. They don't, so it's a fail. All you have to do is look at China's NIOs efforts to install a nationwide battery swapping station network. It's amazing, and no doubt if Toyota wanted to they could do something similar to NIO but they won't. 👎
Is Toyota or the Japanese government investing in Hydrogen distribution networks? If even within Japan they are not investing heavily in building Hydrogen distribution networks, how are they going to sell Hydrogen cars to other countries?
@@adamiskandar5107 I'm pretty sure in Japan they are putting in the networks for themselves but in the US where they're also selling their hydrogen cars there's hardly any stations. Maybe a handful for every major metro area. I don't know how they can expect mass adoption without a good filling station network.
The hydrogen filling station is many times the investment of petrol station which in turn also cost more than EV charging station. Even though it takes more or less the time filling up petrol the hydrogen filing itself presents lost of logistic (transportation of H2 gas) the freezing of nozzles (the H2 gas has to kept at below freezing point) so the filling cannot be done car after car like petrol - constant heating of the nozzle to prevent the nozzle being stuck to the car. Meaning in theory it probable takes annual hour for 10 cars would turn out to be half a day to unstuck or unfreeze the nozzle. Not to mention the great inefficiency of the fuel around 30-40% conversion to energy. Firstly need electricity to convert to H2 from water or any other source then energy requires for transportation then the H2 also losses energy before transforming into energy whereas the electrify or battery to energy is almost 100%
Japan📉
China 📈
I think no sabotage done by legacy auto makers. Owning a full EV is problematic. Charging takes a long time. Plus no world standard in charging station. All auto makers have their own system which are not compatible with its competitors.
Plus battery technology have not reached its optimum capability. The moment a new battery is introduce, the older EV loses its value.
Toyota is almost fully hybrid. It was the first to introduce hybrid decades ago. Using hybrid reduces usage of petrol by a significant margin.
I previously owned first Prius and later Camry hybrid. The saving in petrol was certainly much less than claimed officially especially the Camry hybrid. Firstly the vehicle is heavier due to the extra battery weight plus the petrol engine weight. Then you need to charge the battery using the petrol engine before you can power the car using the electric motor. In other words you don’t save any petrol if you are doing short trips as you are burning more petrol at the beginning of the journey. Thus, one only get the better mileage and saving on petrol if you are making longer trips like driving long distances or outstation.
@@johnhy2446diesel vehicles were very economical but now they banned it in parts of European urban areas.
And in California.
my question to MR TAN what car ur driving let me guest MB EQS or BMW I7 🤔🤔🤨🤨
👏👏👏👍👍👍🥰🌈
Just buy tesla. Good quality and reasonable price car
Why just TESLA? China now produces EV cars which are better quality and cheaper than Tesla.
@adamiskandar5107 have you sat in byd before. Can't compare with tesla man. The quality the sound proof, the suspension. U can feel the difference in terms of quality. Take a drove.
good quality but certainly not priced for the masses.
The whole story
Are you a Tesla salesman?