Battlefield 2042's Future is Dead
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 апр 2024
- EA has announced a few things regarding Battlefield 2042's future, as well as the future of Battlefield as a whole
LIKE and SUBSCRIBE with NOTIFICATIONS ON if you enjoyed the video! 👍
💪BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CHANNEL - ruclips.net/user/BigfryTVjoin
💰 DONATE: streamlabs.com/bigfrytv/tip
👕 MERCH: bigfryshop.com
🖥️ BENQ Monitors: benqurl.biz/3Edd9ja
▶️ GET CONNECTED:
🎥 MoreBigfry: / morebigfry
🎮 Game Store | www.nexus.gg/Bigfry
🎮 Fanatical Game Keys | www.fanatical.com/en/?ref=bigfry
👉 Discord | / discord
🐦 Twitter | / bigfrytv
📷 Instagram | / bigfrytv
📱 TikTok | tiktok.com/BigfryTV
Outro Cover Done by: / @zulegmat 
Игры
Well, it's to be expected, but we now have official confirmation that Battlefield 2042's Content Support is DONEZO. What do you want to see from the next Battlefield title?
There was no saving this game. It was broken beyond repair, and no amount of content updates and bug fixes would save it. I played it for like a week and then uninstalled, never looked back.
If the next Battlefield is around the quality of 2042, this franchise is done for.
the franchise to end. same for cod
I want the next BF game to not kill the franchise and extinguish all interest in it. BF4 needs a living franchise when EA pulls the plug on the servers, the more people who join the future community servers the better.
It doesn’t matter what the next game actually has in it, I’m not buying it anyway. It just has to not immediately repel 99% of gamers again like 2042 did.
It was DONEZO from the beginning.....
It is 2012. The developer of Dead Space is tasked by EA to develop a Battlefield game. They release a solid title but it ultimately doesn't reach the highs of BF3 and the studio is unceremoniously shut down.
It is 2024. The developer of Dead Space is tasked by EA to develop a Battlefield game...
History reapets itself it seems...
history often rhymes
Yeah but the last of the Dead Space game they made was hot garbage and was a insult to the last two games so it's not like they were shutting down a good Studio
Honestly, I would still prefer Hardline over 2042.
Also part of motive is also making an Iron Man game they have been for the past 2 years
EA really shit the bed with this title. Horrible launch and post content is okay at minimum. They will never, ever go back to the glory of BF4 or BFBC2, the Battlefield game people have been yelling about for litterally years and years.
i agree.. ive been yelling about it too
Bad company 2 with better graphics is all I've ever wanted
That is the sad truth of it all, the golden days of BFBC1 and 2 and BF3 and 4 are gone. The people who made it moved on to other studios. The institutional knowledge has been lost, scattered over many different companies. The people who made BF2042 were a bunch of newcomers to the series that had no idea how a BF game should be.
the content was horrid lol all of its been ass
EA means Eliminate All. meaning eliminate every game they get there hands on. Look at Anthem EA fucked that game
Sad... to me the worst part about BF2042 were the maps and destruction. Compare Bf2042 to the masterpiece that is BF1. You wouldn't believe it was the same studio.
It basically isnt. The people who made BF1 are long gone by now.
You can thank EA for being the greedy motherfuckers that they are. They ruin everything they touch.
It isn't the same studio
True. Sad to see the BF becoming this shell of it former self.
Same publisher same title not the same studio but I agree with the sentiment 2042 did not feel like a battlefield game
Anyone who gets "excited" for a battlefield game after what was done to everyone with 2042 has a very short memory.. or is a mug
Most are the latter.
Let’s not undersell it, they have severe memory loss or are just plain fanboys of being milked like sellouts.
I saw this coming from a mile away. The foundation was shit, so everything else was shit.
I kept saying the exact same thing to people who claimed that 2042 was good now
@@the_reasonable_one5554 I swear. I feel like EA is allergic to learning from mistakes.
To this day console and mouse input is broken, and the recoil is bugged and makes the gunplay feel really bad
@@the_reasonable_one5554 its MUCH better now than it was at launch, that is true. but foundation held it back, MASSIVELY.
@@Gapis321 obviously it’s better than the dumpster fire it was at launch
"your appetite for more BF2042 remained strong".....who the fuck has said that? The game and past games have been an absolute black eye to what BF stands for.
BF5 and 2024 yes , bf1/bf4/bf3 were peak
@@maciejgabrys1346
3 had broken air vehicles. 4's launch was an absolute disaster and made tanks way too strong and dumbed down nearly every BF3 map remake. 1 was an insult to history and had a disastrous campaign.
BC2 was the absolute highest peak of the franchise. Decent singleplayer, most balanced multiplayer, best maps in the series, best use of destruction mechanics, best DLC (more like expansion) and absolutely 0 EXP boosters or other paid crap.
@@johnhighway7399👈🤡
But... but... you can play as a non binary squirrel person! That's what you wanted right? Twitter, tumblr and TikTok said that was what you wanted...
@@johnhighway7399 let them sniff on copium and nostalgia.
Still can’t believe they canned SWBF2 for this.
It's crazy that the franchise that was going neck and neck with COD is now at rock bottom with little to no hope.
Thanks for the video boss man!
They're both at rock bototm with little to no hope, I'd say they're still neck and neck.
no way... COD lte die like 4 COD games before 2042 support was done XD
I would play 2042 over cod 😂
@@OrionDawn15 Not even close, you guys got one map and two guns after what 5 months of no content??? Now compare that to season 3 of cod, not even fucking close lmfao battlefield is insanely boring
@@bigirish4542 Quality wise, both games are bad. The content offered is irrelevant.
I want it to go back to 3 and 4 with some of the abilities in 5 and 1 added....
Is it just me or did 2042 never really feel like a battlefield game? Obviously the operators were weird but the gunplay, maps, movement, even the way it looks never felt like battlefield and I just couldn’t get into it. Learned my lesson for sure. Bought this for $120 won’t happen again.
Game originally was supposed to be a battle royal so tbh operators, a overwatch/fortnite hybrid. Executives then stepped in and said make it a battlefield game so then the devs scrambled to do so hence why it feels unlike a battlefield game.
it felt like a cod off temu
@@AtomicDudMan okay that makes sense, I knew something always felt off. I try to sit down and play it but it just doesn’t feel good.
@@jfd9616 😂
Feels like a Chinese bootleg version of BF4
Motive couldn't hit sales goals for the Dead Space Remake so like the original Dead Space studio, they got pushed to a Battlefield game. EA committing the same bull each and every time.
What do you mean? Dead space remake was a colossal success
Yeah not true. They moved like half the team to help with battlefield for now. They are still developing another game
A DS2 remake dream died a while ago when Motive got tasked to make Marvel games
@@onemorescout They did? When?
huh not true & motive still developing the iron man game
I loved in the interview on the Pogcast Madfinger CEO, Mara, said everyone wants bf3, but they keep doing things different.
from a development perspective...its not a good thing, people always see old things with rose tint glasses from the past
BF3 FOR TODAY standarts its kinda mid even among BF fans people prefer the BF1 level of attention to detail and improvement, BF3 where did not show nothing new realisitically even in BF context considering what all the features on BF3 was already on Bad Company 2
@@Warfaremachine0095not entirely true, look how well-received CoD MW2019 was...
@@airrd you can play the OG warzone?
@@Warfaremachine0095 huh? I'm talking about CoD MW2019 not Warzone
Don't get your hopes up...DEI will be crammed down our thoughts just like 2042/5/1
I hate to say it, but this was an inevitable. What was truly surprising is that they stretched it out for this long, and we can only hope that the next Battlefield is decent. What stings is that we all know that they won’t learn their lessons from 2042, or at the very least the drastic ones.
A Cold War battle field with Hinds and T-72 would be cool.
It would also be a good chance to up the ante for destruction by adding tactical nuclear warfare to some degree. Personally I would like to see a Korean War game.
I'm not holding my breath.
For me, I've been waiting for a Battlefield game for nearly 6 years. I loved BF3 and BF4, they were my introduction to the franchise, after playing CoD for a few years. They were larger scale battles, with more variety than "run around this tiny map and shoot everyone." You had medics to heal and revive dead players, engineers to repair or take out vehicles, support gunners to suppress fire and provide ammo, and snipers for recon and making sure the enemy has to stay in cover. I was hooked and never went back to CoD after that. Between BF3 and BF4 on both PC and consoles, I have a couple thousand hours of gameplay.
... But then BF1 came out, and I liked it, it was fun - but I just don't like the historical shooters as much as I like the modern ones. So I played about 100 hours of BF1, but always found myself going back to BF4.
Then BF5 came out, and I played it for 20 minutes, and I went back to BF4.
Then 2042 announcements starting coming out. "Back to basics, back to our roots, traditional Battlefield". I was ecstatic, the prodigal son returned - but... then it came out. I tried, I really tried. I hated it. It's terrible. It wasn't fun, it wasn't the Battlefield I remembered. This wasn't "back to basics" or anything like we had on BF4.
So no, I'm not holding my breath for Battlefield: CashGrab 6. EA burned me too many times. They can EAt my backside.
BIGGER SQUADS!!! They really need a game mode with bigger squads. 128 player maps really need 6-8 player squads.
So the real question is will they learn their lessons and actually give us a true battlefield game next? I desperately want that to be the case. However I won't hold my breath
nope, the pre marketing push sounds awfully like the one for bf2042
No because the people who made those kinds of games all left to create their own studios.
No, because their next battlefield will be a battle Royale crap.
And it will NEVER be missed 😂
fun fact, every single person that says things like this are playing it as they type the comment out. don't forget EA was the one that said "if you don't like it, don't play it". also don't forget the game they said that about went on to be one of the most successful in the franchise.
Wrong. I never touched Battlecrap 2042. Not even once.
@@firstlast-wm3lithen dont say you wont miss it lol
@@mr_bubbleg8953 @mr_bubbleg8953 It's a general statement, arsewipe. What are you going to do about it?
@@mr_bubbleg8953 It's a general statement, dum dum. What are you going to do about it?
Ignoring the bad company series has been a travesty. We need a BC3 like 10 years ago.
Knowing the current state of Dice it won't be good
Couldnt agree more,It just absolutely infuriates me how DICE has been ignoring BC3 for 14 years straight,I hope and pray to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ that this studio shuts down
@@DJPUPPETMASTER-RESURRECTED- pretty sure the DICE today isn't the same Dice 10 years ago. If you want them to be shut down, put your hate towards Embark Studios because that's where the Dice veterans went. The Finals feels and sounds more like Battlefield than Battlefield.
@@triadwarfare Embark Studios also deserves to be shut down,The Finals was overrated trash and their next game Arc Raiders will be a massive failure too....Not to mention their nosy ass stuck up degen of a CEO who spat in the face of Battlefield fans by saying "accept it or dont buy the game" when all the controversy about Battlefield V happened....
I honestly want this guy to go bankrupt and beg for money on the street like a bum
These BR type games are just not it.
Most people just want bf3 / bf4 type gameplay.
That's it. That's all we need.
Yea I only like BF4,BF1 and Bf5 that’s the only ones I own the rest sucks.
I actually want a Battlefield with all the lessons learned from the Ukraine war and Gaza put in there just like how BF3 and 4 were from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
Not just battlefield 2042, the entire dead space franchise went down along with it.
My perfect BF
-the quality and feel of BF3
-the amount of content of BF4
-the atmosphere and immersion of BF1
-the gunplay and movement of BF5
I seriously doubt we will get basically any of these but a guy can hope
My perfect BF
-A working game
Fuck BF1. Keep it purely BF3 & 4
A cool story like in bad company for the campaign. In fact, add all of that to make bad company 3.
Anyone thinking the next game is gonna be good is huffing a lethal amount of copium.
Kinda wish they would actually try to work with the 128 player mode and maybe design the maps better for it and design better systems. It was my favorite aspect of the shit show was the massive player count and just seeing the entire team moving. We got a busted game and I don’t think the 128 player aspect deserves scrutiny because of it.
I was thinking the same thing, they barely know how to design for 64 let alone 128. BF has always had some strange map design choices but on 2042 the amount of times I spawned in the main area just to be immediately killed because there is either literally no cover or so little cover that someone standing on a footstool, let alone the skyscraper directly opposite can see into it. Even after some re-works the spawn areas may change but the problem persists.
we need big open maps, 95% destructability, smaller amounts of intricate city spaces, focus on squad play, no bots, strong anti cheat, large depth to progression and customization, leaderboards and voip on launch
2042 has big open maps since the maps were designed for a large battle royal type experience initially, destruction would be good, squad play yes but strong anti cheat? Like what? More kernel level root kits? They don't work never have worked and never will work. What they need is to allow communities to host their own servers and let them moderate them instead of charging hundreds a year to host your own. I play BF1 in a region specific server, they have mods watching the matches constantly and cheaters get yeeted in less than a few minutes. EA would never fork out the money required to have mods watching every match on DICE hosted servers so they employ root kit AC that don't even work to appear as though they are doing something about it.
AC's don't work mate they never have, the AC's mine your data and the corpos then sell that data onto other corpos, I've never encountered an AC that actually stops cheaters in all my years of playing competitive FPS games. Truth is there is no way to stop them, if mods watch the matches and take feedback from chat they can make decisions on the fly after viewing the evidence before them. There isn't another way to limit it, I know the mods and owner of the largest two BF1 servers in my region and their way actually works. We don't need more AC root kits we just need them to allow communities to host their own servers and allow them to mod them.
Will this happen? No. Its all about engagement now and macrotransactions, they employ the best ways to get you to open your wallet, that is all that matters to them. We will never see those old gem games we grew up playing and enjoyed ever again, those days are gone.
big open maps was 2042's biggest downfall IMO. maybe it's fun if you just play as a sniper every game. Being able to be shot form any direction and from way acorss the map wherever you go wears you out. it eliminates strategy.
@@thecanadakid7622 100%
I honestly couldn't tell if the gameplay you were showing was BF or not... if not for the title and the voice over, I would think it's some generic shooter, or CoD gameplay
Honestly yea
I think Battlefield does much better with games that take place in the past, I would love a veitnam Battlefield.
I wanna play a Korean War game. The Forgotten War needs attention!
Yeah I agree, id love a vietnam battlefield like the bad company 2 mode, another ww2 game would be epic, also a gulf war one would be fucking cool.
We don't know exactly why Letho left, from everything shown it actually sounds like he left for personal reasons but didn't expect EA to outright close the studio he founded and let go most of its employees.
My thing is what did he expect? I'm pretty sure EA solely built Ridgeline cause of him to begin with, now that he gone they probably figured no one there could carry the torch or they were just expandable. Not uncommon to see many studios in the past close right after key staff member left.
Now I find it very interesting that so many studios at EA are basically focusing on the next Battlefield, it should be taken as good news but the same scenario happened with 2042 yet here we are.
I'm oldschool, i remember a time when i loved both Battlefield and CoD because they were such vastly different games. But then CoD became more popular and started pulling ahead and Battlefield made the big mistake of trying to become more like CoD.
What really pulled me in to the early Battlefield games was the massive scale that had never really been seen before where you had land, air and sometimes even sea battles going on in the same game, on the same map, at the same time allowing players to control ALL the equipment on the map, including massive aircraft carriers while CoD was (and still is to some extent)
focused on smaller scale, mainly infantry fighting, higher pace battles.
So to me, Battlefield going "back to its roots" would be going back to that combined arms, massive scale style. Maybe letting it be a bit slower pace but a completly different game experience from CoD.
Weird. They closed Ridgeline and layoffs game devs in Canada and in USA in march. Motive is based in Montréal and they'll hired new persons. Hope, they rehired the former employees from Ridgeline if it's possible.
Gotta be honest, the biggest legacy Battlefield 2042 gave us is that it killed support for Star Wars: Battlefront II. THAT game was in a phenomenal state and EA said fuck it and put all their eggs into the 2042 basket. Which was a complete and utter failure.
Man I’ll never forget how hyped I was for this games setting. Hopefully the next game is the BF4 successor with Bf1 tone that we need.
Getting a refund from this game was the best decision I made three years ago. I still have no regrets nor interest in playing this game since.
We PlayStation players have spent $70 and still have not received the game. Still waiting for the game even today
the next battlefield need more dirt. more grit, every game seems to coming out too clean and smooth looking in textures. give us more night maps like they did in bf4
Everyone: Battlefield is dead we need a new Battlefield.
Me: Logs into Battlebit every weekend and has a blast.
I tried during the free weekend and somehow didn't get into it. BF3 and 4 were magic to me.
They have tarnished Battlefields name. The younger generation won’t understand the nostalgia and incredible memories the original Battlefield games created back in the day. Such a shame.
They ended BattleFront2 for this crap
I know many people will not agree but I thank the people that supported the title after launch. I hope that whoever is to blame for the launch gets fired but the people that tried to fix the title after launch and worked on getting the title back on track have my thanks. They did more then I ever expected that EA would allow them to and at least now it is an ok title to play a few matches here and there. It of course it not the best Battlefield and it will never be but at least we now have a game you can play instead of the dumpster fire we had at launch.
Its sad because battlefield had the potential to be the pc game Sqaud but on console 😢...battlefield 4 was a classic to me but I didn't care for 5 or 2042 😔
I’ll be honest outside of being tone depth to the WWII setting BFV isn’t that bad. I’d it BF1? Nah. But it’s close enough.
@@ContraGrain ISNT BAD???? LITERALLY ITS THE ONLY WW2 GAME OUT THERE WITH NOTHING WHAT MAKE WW2 ICONIC
@@Warfaremachine0095 ok BF1 wasn’t authentic either at the end of the day. If you ignore the wierd character stuff the game in its current state isn’t that bad.
@@ContraGrain that too.. it only had the benefit of not many people know about WW1
@@ContraGrain BF1 captures the realism, the atmosphere and the immersion. It's about what resonates them about war. not everything has to be realistic. You have obviously have no ide what you are talking about if you think milsim is what people want.
"going back to there roots" is exactly what they said when they abandoned BF5
The entire Battlefield franchise ended when BattleField V was released. BF2042 was just an attempt to compete against COD Vanguard, both games failed to deliver what they promise and now they just hit the Point of No Return.
What Battlefield 'is' has been a changing identity on what core beliefs to go by. I have started from BF1942 (1942 Wake Island Best map iteration for all current Battlefield), played peak BF2 (Loved PR Mod), Favourite Battlefield is BF2142 (Titan Mode, Best Game Mode for Battlefield), and the guilty pleasure of BF3.
I preferred battlefield when it was exciting the mind of creating immersive places to fight wars regardless if based on real or fiction.
Where strangers could work together and grow that when battlefield could backup the boast that the core was teamwork, then being optional since Bad Company with everyone not talking, focusing on their personal assignments since BF3 then playing the objectives.
I've past the stages of grief for a longtime that accept it will not come back have not spent a dollar in 2042 only tried it out when free no regrets. Even when they say going back to roots it means nothing to me because they cannot make rewarding promises, I had concerns of 4 classes in 2142, still think BR is too late a PVE extraction like Helldivers 2 better suits Battlefield, and beside from Decent stories from Bad Company they have not made any great or memorable stories (Only prologue to BF1 is only memorable thing).
I hoped Battlefield would learn it's lessons and improve, it hasn't for a decade and even with disagreements with the community on different aspects, I wouldn't have wished for any including those I disagreed to receive a 2042, especially not again, give them Bad Company 3.
Overall, I don't have any expectation of a redeeming franchise, but as with games if your still having fun with battlefield I hope you still pursuit playing where you enjoy, as for me I'm playing Helldivers 2, for Managed Democracy!
If they would have SIMPLY kept the advanced movement and cover mechanics of BF5 and the gore and destruction of BF1, We would have an EPIC 2042 experience. But no, They stepped back and made it entirely basic.
Marcus had some good ideas that made the players happy but the shareholders and publishers angry.....
It would be awesome to have a co op similar to that "raid" mode of the Modern Warfare 2
Bring back the Ghillie suit for recon class. Bucket hats and scarfs do not satisfy my aesthetic desires.
“Don't be sad this is just how it works out sometimes.”
We can write wishlist and hypothesize all we want, but the elephant in the room is that DICE is full of ideologues and politics will always come first, quality of the game distant second.
At least, even if community made, battlefront 2 will get updates soon with the release of kyber 2.0
Sucks Rigline got shutdown, was really anticipating that single player campaign. Hope EA still moves forward with it.
I wish I even cared about Battlefield 2042 being over... I tried it out twice, but it was just the most hollow BF experience ever. The graphics were great, the guns were good, the classes and "abilities" were innovative and fun after some updates, in a vacuum. But the total experience was about as fun as doing the dishes. And that's not just me being old and jaded, seeing as I've been around long enough for BF1942 to have been one of my first experiences of proper online gaming. I still enjoy gaming, just not trash like BF2042.
The maps were unnecessarily large, felt dead and disconnected. Plus, the size made it hard to feel like you could actually make a difference in the outcome of a game by hitting objectives, or thwarting enemy advances - I just couldn't get around fast enough, or rely on teammates caring enough to do objectives instead of just racking up kills without a care for the team result.
There will likely never be a good BF game ever again. At best, we will get more BF titles with amazing marketing prior to launch, followed by a dogshit end product. All hype and gimmicks, without substance.
I’m happy that they’re going back to their old routes but I like the idea of having 64 versus 64 or having the ability to change my weapon attachments while I’m on the battlefield those are two good things I liked about the recent game.
My friend went back to Hardline and then said and I quote
"I'm surprised i even found matches with the new shiny toy out on the market, youd think people would be playing that"
Maybe now the bots will quit coping about how 2042 is secretly good now
Just watching one of my favorite childhood game franchises burn itself down to ash.
Remember.. Originally season 4 was expected to be the last season. After that the year 2 leak came and we got 4 more seasons, I think season 7 only dropped because of the success of season 6. But lets see where this goes for all of us for the future
The game still doesn't run on my PC. The beta on my PC was running at 75 fps on medium settings and was enjoyable but since launch I can't get anything above 45 fps even on the lowest of settings. I thought maybe I finally needed a upgrade to enjoy modern fps games until I played MW2 and Rainbow 6 and both run at 80 fps on my PC on medium with no issues. Even Ready or Not gets 90+ fps on my PC on high settings
The Bad Company experience was peak Battlefield for me. If they went back to those roots I’d definitely consider coming back
I think its funny how most of these game companies who "thought they new best" are now going back to the shit that customers wanted to begin with because it fuckin worked. Lot of places forgot their role.
Ngl to you, I'm kinda surprised it made it this far. They were only obligated to do 4 seasons. Even so, yeah this is a misfire, a severe one at that. People rag on V or Hardline but in spite of their flaws, they still felt like Battlefield and they still brought their own improvements and ideas to the table. 2042 threw it all away, and so even after...2, 3 years, it feels so far behind older Battlefield games. It even feels far behind its competitors. I don't think this will kill BF. So long as CoD exists, EA will still try to compete with it. But I feel like the next Battlefield will have to fight even harder to win back trust. Doesn't help that the old guard is now their competitors too
I will not hold my breath for EA making the right choices
All I wanted was a game where I play as a faceless soldier not a caricature from a battle royal
I eventually enjoyed 2042, but it was never something I would play long term. I would pop on for a day or two here and there, but it could never hold my interest. The gun play for me always just felt hollow and not the "umph" I always expected from battlefield. I enjoyed it, but I never fully "cared" about it if that makes sense.
I see a reoccurring theme here with EA and the developers working for/with them. DICE devs bumped heads to EA higher ups which 2042 was the result of that messy situation and now this fiasco with Ridgeline studio and the head bumping heads with EA. It may just prove the point that the higher ups are ruining things for Battlefield. When you have the bad ass DICE developers who made great games step away from EA and make their own studio because of bad blood with the suits and now this news, things seem to be pointing in that direction. EA is shooting themselves in the foot from the looks of it.
I think throughout this games life span I’ve maybe put about 10 hours into it. I’d check out the new map when a season launched for a few hours but that’s it, this game just never really gripped me at all. Same for BFV. Battlefield 1 was the last true Battlefield for me, I sunk hundreds of hours into that game. I hope they do better next time, but I’m not getting my hopes up.
I miss Battlefield. Warzone has been dead to me since they changed Verdansk for Cold War. I did play a good bit of 2042, but I haven't even been able to log on in I think over a year due to some bug and EA support was so horrific I could never get it fixed. Battlefield 3 was still probably my favorite of all time. I just hope we return to something like that. For now, Helldivers 2 it is, and boy is Managed Democracy good.
Playing BF 1 in the current year is such a refreshing experience and reminds me of things that could be
I just really hope they get back to turning out decent games instead of flaming turds like BFV and 2042
I totally agree with this. To this day I'm still playing BF1 and I' having lot of fun. That game is solid
Bf1 itself was a flaming turd.
@@regularguy2807did you play it
Campaigns and single player are going the way of the dodo, and its not incidental like we did to the dodo; but it is MANUFACTURED!
If BF:Firestorm had been F2P it probably would've been a huge hit.
Solid Battlefield 4 type release in modern day with new maps and bring back old popular guns!
after this last release, I wont even consider buying it until season 2 or 3 and then I will make my call if it is worth it or not. No way I am buying on launch like I did last time
Basically BF3 with modern graphics. That’s what I want.
Still playing BF3/4 with friends. Never found a reason to get the newer games.
EA probably brought in SBI and Marcus said no, thus EA let him go.
I wish we would get semi realistic CoD and BF games again.
Lol the games were never realistic
@@Carnyzzlethat's why they said semi realistic dude
@@Carnyzzleboth games always had a realistic aesthetic even if the gameplay wasn’t realistic. A realistic aesthetic is enough to create an immersive experience
The second i heard they wanted to make a battle royale as well as the game i knew straight away its going to be the same shit next release , they may as well put the money into expansions and updates of all previous popular bf titles that 95% of the community still play religiously.
i could say i want the old class system back, i dont want specialists or i want more content than just 1 map and 3 guns per season but at this point i just want a working, fun experience that doesn't take up to a year or more of fixing to be playable. but then again that's just the reality of modern gaming.
I’m sure they’ll update the in game store to resell us past season content…
I remember when people were counting down the days for this game to launch after getting hyped on the trailer. People even considering buying ultimate edition on day one 😂
I miss the old Battlefield experience, Bad Company/Battlefield 3 style vibes.... such a shame that they don't listen to the community and instead just try to compete with Fall Of Duty and copy them...
I hope the next battlefield is class based again like bf4 because I’m not a fan of specialist “clone killing” gameplay and the uniqueness of class weapons was really nice. I still enjoy bf2042 but it’s just my preference
Yes BF2042 had issues but is there another FPS game that will allow u to quickly configure/switch your gun for short to mid to long range on the fly or during gun battles? That feature was a game changer
I really hope EA sees the potential of the standards Indie developers set;
Loyalty and origionality over Profit-first.
People play games to relax, have fun, and escape reality,
the latest AAA games have often failed to do that, and feel like lazy reskins, or "Improvements" that really only made things worse.
Wasn't it always dead? I hope the new team working on the next installment is more competent. If they could fix the audio issues since like bf4, that'd be great. I want to hear footsteps and hear tanks before they're running me over lol
Im personally over the whole BR thing it was fun in og warzone, but I haven't touched it since
just wait untill next release, they will have learned nothing. Dice does this every time. They fix a problem in a previous game and the next title has that exact same problem
Wish we could have gotten more for bf1
I enjoyed 2042 for being different. Crazy to see amazing studios fall so deep. I would like a single player tho.
They also quit need for speed heat 6 months into release
What happened to DICE the original BF studio?
Battlefield 6 just needs to be BF2 and BF4 combined. Thats what we want. Bring back the squad commander mechanics and all the maps and factions from BF2, add in destruction, all the gunplay of 4 and the progresion system. Boom, you have a masterpiece.
Sucks for Lehto and team BUT.... It was a single player game, I would hope they just double down on multiplayer and flesh out the content path to support it for a solid 2-3 years at the least
As long as EA is involved with Battlefield, it will shit the bed.
Tbh Im glad a studio knows when to quit. Too many developers change things for the sake of change along with those content update and makes the game unrecognizable for people who dont play as often.
I want to see battlefield 3 and 4 comeback. The levelution and just awesome BIG GAME gameplay come back.
The money spent on 2042’s live service could’ve been spent literally anywhere else on Earth and been less of a waste. EA could’ve donated it to Elon and still gotten a more positive outcome.
All We wanted was bf4 with a tiny futuristic touch, instead they basically gave us call of duty black ops 4 with a darker color pallet, it’s disgusting what they did to my boy😔.
You’re telling me Santa skins didn’t save the game. I’m shocked.
Battlefield 1 was the last true masterpiece Battlefield game. Battlefield 5 had amazing gameplay though and had potential to make a comeback and become one of the best WW2 games ever but they just decided to abandon that opportunity and then they had Battlefield 2042 which the trailer got us hyped and the setting is such a cool idea and feels like a possible near future scenario with World War 3 and climate change but then of course they messed that up to and didn’t live up to the hype and they had a chance to redeem themselves and the game felt like it was starting to make a small comeback and then they pull the plug now. I fucking hate EA so damn much and how much they fucked over DICE and the Battlefield franchise. I fear that DICE and Battlefield will never be able to make a comeback.