Hey guys! If you like the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter. You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us
Wouldn't it be funny that our ego makes us think we can just go takeover planets, but then we get there and there's already beings living there and they're like GTFOH!
It seems to be in our colonizing nature (eg The Americas, or any of the empires past and present). Maybe we will need to come up with a Prime Directive. Maybe aliens have done so already.
Red stars have a unique property as they all have a very bloated plasma atmosphere surrounding them which glows red, mostly in infrared spectrum. All planets orbiting inside this plasma atmosphere will always experience almost even temperatures which is very hospitable for life. Its like siting inside a sauna for the orbiting planets so the earth-like planets don't necessarily need to orbit within goldilocks zone and planets wont have ice caps.
Isn’t the radiation from Red Dwarf Stars now been shown to be too toxic to life as we know it? There are too many dangerous flares erupting from the ancient Star.
@@mushi1985 Tidally locked means lava men on one side & polar bears on the other but a small band in between of 20c temperatures - magnetic field not likely so life needs to live underground - Oh better hope the Red Dwarf read the studies not to cook us
Pretend the space craft left yesterday for Gliese 581c at whatever speed you like thats possible, whatever, between time, time dilation and our life spans, we here on earth will never know what happens or be alive to know what the result is, makes you think.
One day, Earth won’t be habitable, regardless of how well humans take care of it. So, in the short term, we take care of our own planet. In the long term, we look for possible future homes, preferably orbiting a K-class (orange) or M-class (red) dwarf star. In the next few million years, several such stars will pass within one light year; hopefully by then we can travel there if a suitable planet (or large moon) is located there.
@@outbackigloo6489 In the long term the rest of the universe won't be habitable either. It's also hilarious to actually think humans will be able to make it anywhere other than earth and live
@@hbman1320 - The rest of the universe will be habitable for trillions of years. Our Earth will be habitable for about one billion years, tops, unless humans manage to destroy it earlier. How long do humans have? If we don’t destroy ourselves sooner, maybe a million years, hopefully to evolve into another intelligent species. Given those figures, if humans or their descendants can survive a few million years and can improve on space travel, then their chance for long term survival will be as I’ve described: to travel to a habitable planet orbiting a long-lasting star that has strayed to less than a light year from Earth. If that is beyond their capabilities, then humanity is f***ed.
i’ll be glad when the earth like exoplanets we discuss r orbiting stars like Sol instead of red dwarfs... i understand red dwarfs r about 75% of the stars, but hopefully jwst will open the door for finding exoplanets orbiting yellow or orange dwarfs
Indeed. My understanding is that red dwarfs may be low temperature, but they have gamma ray bursts that could sterilize any planets in the vicinity. We’re still finding out that our “common” sun isn’t so common after all.
Exactly. Its beyond me how *tidally locked* planets could be considered *our potential new homes*. Its delusional. In fact, M type Red stars are not the right place for us to search for >>new homes
I don’t understand the excitement over planets of red dwarf stars. Among other things, the their tendency to generate large solar flares makes survival, especially in the habitable zone troublesome. Of course, the relative ease for astronomers to detect planets orbiting them, might have something to do with it. Note: I replied, based on new information from an expert on red dwarfs.
I learned something new, today. Red dwarfs last a trillion years or so. And the solar flares are the equivalent of the terrible twos. So it is possible for a planet to evolve life forms while orbiting a mature red dwarf, if it doesn’t get stripped bare. Though it occurs to me that tidal forces from the primary would make the planet migrate outward in its orbit, in the same way that the Earth is pushing the moon away.
I subscribed cos of no ads. I hate ads sooooooo much. Oh an ads played just as I put this comment up. Well as long as the uploaded don’t take the piss with ads I stay subscribed. 👍🐿
I broke another word in Wow signal, it says watch 581D. WHY? Another says "the last of 5" besides the above. 5 has been used twice in this cipher, why? I already got 6EQUJ5, it is an obscentity. I do not understand and I never heard of 581D. Is it hostile? Maybe this signal came from 581C?
With constant scientific discoveries that number could change, Same as our theories on how the universe came to be could be disproven in 50 years time, Because no one can prove anything with 100 % accuracy.
@@paweladamczyk4043 Yup, the "scientific method" at work here. First the theory, or better a hypothesis, then data collection, test the hypothesis, see the results and determine if they support the hypothesis, or not. Then verify those results,.....by actually going there. Long time yet for confirmation. Things take time, maybe geological time; been that way since we "big monkeys" dropped from the trees and first banged the rocks together!! But we've come a long way since then, most of us anyway; but still some folks on this planet stuck in the stone age, you'll agree!! :D
If the constellation lies about 20 light years from us, it will take us about 350,000 years to reach it at today's meanes, so how could it be a possible station to set up on??
I always have wondered what would we do if we found a new habitable planet and had the means to get there only to find that when we arrived, the planet is already inhabited by other intelligent beings. Would we move on or do like we did to the native Americans who were less technical and try to move in anyway. We have to make sure that any planet already inhabited is left alone or we should be invited to stay instead of just moving in.
Most likely, all the planets of Red Dwarfs in their habitable zones, are tidally locked. Meaning : Half of planet always summer / daylight. Half of planet always winter / dark. Both with unbearable temperatures. *Search for new home* around M (Red Dwarf) stars are in vain. We must focus on K (Orange) and G (Yellow) stars.
Depends upon their size, composition also as if the size is more and composition is Rocky they may have large gravitational force that can avoid tidal locking also
We can barely go to the Moon, and going to Mars is almost an utopic enterprise. We don't have the technology nor the resources (or even the life span needed) to travel to another solar system, and we never will.
There is good info here about Gliese 581c, for which I thank you. But the video is also riddled with errors: @3:13: "If the Sun was a red dwarf and we LIED at the same distance from it..." then we would be liars. 'Lied' is the past tense of the verb 'to lie' which means to prevaricate. It is NOT the past tense of the verb 'to lie' which means to be recumbent or occupy a position. The past tense of that verb is 'lay'. My Bonnie lies over the ocean today, She lay over the ocean yesterday. She has lain over the ocean since her untimely death. While 'lay is the past tense of 'to lie, it is not the past tense of 'to lay', meaning 'to place something down. My hen lays an egg almost every day. she laid one today and on yesterday. In the past week, she has laid 6 eggs. She is a good layer, but not a liar. The second error in that quote is the use of 'was' for the subjunctive. The sun is not a red dwarf. If it WERE, the Earth would be frigid. A Mars-sized planet is not called 'subterranean' (8:54), but 'sub-terran'. If it were subterranean, it would be underground and, therefore, in another planet, perhaps as a very large meteorite. What IS your native language? The illustration with magnets is misleading because the phenomenon that HARPS detects is the 'doppler method' which depends on the fact that the star and its planet co-rotate about their common center of gravity on opposite sides thereof. When, from our perspective, the planet is on one side of its orbit, moving directly away from us, the star is on the opposite side, moving ever so slightly toward us. The light from the star is slightly blue-shifted. When the positions are reversed, the light from the star is slightly red-shifted. The 'S' in ''HARPS' is for its 'spectrograph' which can measure that difference and help us deduce the relative masses of the bodies and the distance of the planet. Nevertheless, I enjoyed the video.
Very interesting video , thanks a lot. You say that we have found 60 habitables planets. Do you know how many of them turn around yellow dwarf like us?
@@bricoach9332 Idk yet but, when naming it, we should use something that's unique to that particular planet for example, Earth would be better if it were named after its entire-planet-spanning inhabitants like Caerula Smartmonke (just example, not srs)
On thing seems wrong here. This planet is bigger than ours, and as such could have correspondingly more gravity. If we attempt to go there and land, at what point is crashing due to gravity going to happen instead, or at what point is a landing one way only, with rockets designed for earths gravity, not being powerful enough to lift off again. In all the talk on exoplanets no one has ever eliminated any for this reason, yet it's a big consideration. Is any info available showing at what mass larger than earth this cut off point exists. If so what is it???? 🙄🤨😗😎
Distances are too vast for such travel, and nothing but massless photons will ever approach light speed -- which is excruciatingly slow in comparison to interstellar distances. If we ever find ET, we'll learn his origin is right here in our enormous-but-tiny Solar system.
I thought, if we look at the stars, we look at the light they made millions of years ago (depending, on how far they are away). If we search NOW for other planets, we actually see the PAST of them, correct? Imagine, we find now the second earth, but its 20 or 50 lightyears away, also imagine we can now jump to the planet in 1 hour (imagine!!) could it be, that the planet is already destroyed / the sun is too large / the planet is too cold because he moved away? I mean our data is from the past since the light took 20 years to move from there to us. In 20 years many things could change, see on our earth (deserts, forests...) also almost got hit by large asteroids.
This would be an interesting planet to visit, but not move there, unless no other option existed at the time, like the Taliban taking over the whole Earth!! Seriously, or maybe Sirius-ly (see what I did there) I've been a "space case" since I was a teen growing up in the Apollo NASA years. Exciting times, as are these, with the recent exoplanet search. Good stuff to come so I can't get too excited about an "over the skis" statement like you made calling this "our new home ?". WAAAAAAYYYYYYY to early for that, but I understand "click bait" on this subject, even Anton uses it!! So far, the more I hear folks like you declaring they (astronomers) have found "another earth-like planet" the more I like the Earth-like Earth. But keep trying, you astronomers, even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut!! LOL. Soooo,.....Go James Webb! Unless we divert all NASA's tiny budget to "refugee resettlement efforts" in America. :D
Our new home is in heaven, a place where our lord Jesus went and prepared for us. His works is all done but saints are not ready. Jesus is coming soon , repent and accept Jesus Christ as lord and savior.
our new home? and yet we cant even get out of this solar system 😅😅😅 what of there is already a civilization more advance than us residing there,,? is it still our new home,? maybe earth will be there new home.. hahaha
Is live possible on Glise 581c? No. Why? Because of his host star... It's Red Dwarf. Red Dwarfs are very unstable, so they blow up often. It blows once, and whole live on every planet of its system gonna be obliterated.
Hey guys! If you like the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter. You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us
Wouldn't it be funny that our ego makes us think we can just go takeover planets, but then we get there and there's already beings living there and they're like GTFOH!
It seems to be in our colonizing nature (eg The Americas, or any of the empires past and present).
Maybe we will need to come up with a Prime Directive. Maybe aliens have done so already.
I would imagine unmanned probes will be sent before a maned ship ever leaves Earth.
I simply think its easier to change our lifestyle instead of changing our planet
Exactly. They can't figure out how to get things right here and already talking about changing planets. 😒
Primitive thinking at it finest.
@@angiesworld8038 but changing planets is cooler
Red stars have a unique property as they all have a very bloated plasma atmosphere surrounding them which glows red, mostly in infrared spectrum. All planets orbiting inside this plasma atmosphere will always experience almost even temperatures which is very hospitable for life. Its like siting inside a sauna for the orbiting planets so the earth-like planets don't necessarily need to orbit within goldilocks zone and planets wont have ice caps.
Physicist Wal Thornhill explains this unique property of red stars very well in his video "Wal Thornhill: The Star ‘Proto-Saturn’ | EU Workshop".
Isn’t the radiation from Red Dwarf Stars now been shown to be too toxic to life as we know it? There are too many dangerous flares erupting from the ancient Star.
Just recently some studies have shown the flares come out at more inclined angles away from the eliptical plane of orbiting planets
@@mushi1985 Tidally locked means lava men on one side & polar bears on the other but a small band in between of 20c temperatures - magnetic field not likely so life needs to live underground - Oh better hope the Red Dwarf read the studies not to cook us
I believe there are studies that show that older Red Dwarf Stars tend to calm down and not have the radiation flares that younger versions do.
Not in every case. Some are very calm per se.
@@Jack_Ragnarsson Leave a link to the cases you know of that don't -
A big "A+" to all our Insane Curiosity Team. The changes you've made are so very well done. 🤩
Pretend the space craft left yesterday for Gliese 581c at whatever speed you like thats possible, whatever, between time, time dilation and our life spans, we here on earth will never know what happens or be alive to know what the result is, makes you think.
Gliese 581c Radio Signal is about to go in year 2029.
How is any planet 50% larger than earth earth like ? Wouldn’t it’s gravity be crushing?
Sorry peeps, won't happen. Humans have 1 place to live. If we don't fix it we're doomed. So get to fixin'
One day, Earth won’t be habitable, regardless of how well humans take care of it. So, in the short term, we take care of our own planet. In the long term, we look for possible future homes, preferably orbiting a K-class (orange) or M-class (red) dwarf star. In the next few million years, several such stars will pass within one light year; hopefully by then we can travel there if a suitable planet (or large moon) is located there.
@@outbackigloo6489 In the long term the rest of the universe won't be habitable either. It's also hilarious to actually think humans will be able to make it anywhere other than earth and live
@@hbman1320 - The rest of the universe will be habitable for trillions of years. Our Earth will be habitable for about one billion years, tops, unless humans manage to destroy it earlier. How long do humans have? If we don’t destroy ourselves sooner, maybe a million years, hopefully to evolve into another intelligent species.
Given those figures, if humans or their descendants can survive a few million years and can improve on space travel, then their chance for long term survival will be as I’ve described: to travel to a habitable planet orbiting a long-lasting star that has strayed to less than a light year from Earth. If that is beyond their capabilities, then humanity is f***ed.
Aloha!!!…My favorite channel.
i’ll be glad when the earth like exoplanets we discuss r orbiting stars like Sol instead of red dwarfs... i understand red dwarfs r about 75% of the stars, but hopefully jwst will open the door for finding exoplanets orbiting yellow or orange dwarfs
Indeed. My understanding is that red dwarfs may be low temperature, but they have gamma ray bursts that could sterilize any planets in the vicinity. We’re still finding out that our “common” sun isn’t so common after all.
The way the universe is. We’re in a simulation
Btw sol is the name of our sun.
@@voodoochile7581 i knew that, that is why i used it... meaning sunlike stars with exoplanets in the habitable zone
Exactly. Its beyond me how *tidally locked* planets could be considered *our potential new homes*. Its delusional.
In fact, M type Red stars are not the right place for us to search for >>new homes
I don’t understand the excitement over planets of red dwarf stars. Among other things, the their tendency to generate large solar flares makes survival, especially in the habitable zone troublesome. Of course, the relative ease for astronomers to detect planets orbiting them, might have something to do with it.
Note: I replied, based on new information from an expert on red dwarfs.
I learned something new, today. Red dwarfs last a trillion years or so. And the solar flares are the equivalent of the terrible twos. So it is possible for a planet to evolve life forms while orbiting a mature red dwarf, if it doesn’t get stripped bare.
Though it occurs to me that tidal forces from the primary would make the planet migrate outward in its orbit, in the same way that the Earth is pushing the moon away.
Our new home? Do we deserve?
I subscribed cos of no ads. I hate ads sooooooo much.
Oh an ads played just as I put this comment up. Well as long as the uploaded don’t take the piss with ads I stay subscribed. 👍🐿
I broke another word in Wow signal, it says watch 581D. WHY? Another says "the last of 5" besides the above. 5 has been used twice in this cipher, why? I already got 6EQUJ5, it is an obscentity. I do not understand and I never heard of 581D. Is it hostile? Maybe this signal came from 581C?
If I get there early can I get something on the beach?
You still didn't explain how is it our new home
0:42 how is HD 140283 around 14 billion years old when the universe is 13.8 billion?
13.8 or 13.6 ect is close to 14 lol its just being dramatic for views
With constant scientific discoveries that number could change, Same as our theories on how the universe came to be could be disproven in 50 years time, Because no one can prove anything with 100 % accuracy.
@@LugHoles1 tbf in 50 years time civilization will probably be the same as in wall-e lol
Why did you pronounce it Gill ease when it is spelled like glee esse?
What do we do if we finally were able to make it to another planet and it's already inhabited?
Yea but how's the wifi?
Does it have a magnetosphere, orbis it being radiate from the red sun.
Great video and information !
There is no information in this video. Everything he says is based on assumptions. Sci-fi mambo-jumbo.
@@paweladamczyk4043 Yup, the "scientific method" at work here. First the theory, or better a hypothesis, then data collection, test the hypothesis, see the results and determine if they support the hypothesis, or not. Then verify those results,.....by actually going there. Long time yet for confirmation. Things take time, maybe geological time; been that way since we "big monkeys" dropped from the trees and first banged the rocks together!! But we've come a long way since then, most of us anyway; but still some folks on this planet stuck in the stone age, you'll agree!! :D
I'll look into that later 👍
Won’t the sunlight be reddish in color, how would possible life adapt to this?
Our new home...my home is earth and always wil be....
If the constellation lies about 20 light years from us, it will take us about 350,000 years to reach it at today's meanes, so how could it be a possible station to set up on??
Bro imagine how fast we could travel in the future
It's time for faster spacecraft
The planet could either go through a runaway greenhouse effect, or be the most earth like planet.
Maybe its two other neighbors, Gliese 581 d and g, could possibly be cooler, indicating it could be more favorable for life.
Just another planet we can invade and ruin. How about fixing this one instead of looking for another?
@ 2:20 you talk about Red Dwarfs but show the animation for one of the biggest stars... Betelgeuse! WTF?
I always have wondered what would we do if we found a new habitable planet and had the means to get there only to find that when we arrived, the planet is already inhabited by other intelligent beings. Would we move on or do like we did to the native Americans who were less technical and try to move in anyway. We have to make sure that any planet already inhabited is left alone or we should be invited to stay instead of just moving in.
Has the James Web Space Telescope been sent in the direction of the Gliese system?
the answer is no. Red Dwarfs cannot produce ultra violet light to grow plants,
Most likely, all the planets of Red Dwarfs in their habitable zones, are tidally locked.
Meaning : Half of planet always summer / daylight. Half of planet always winter / dark. Both with unbearable temperatures.
*Search for new home* around M (Red Dwarf) stars are in vain. We must focus on K (Orange) and G (Yellow) stars.
Depends upon their size, composition also as if the size is more and composition is Rocky they may have large gravitational force that can avoid tidal locking also
We can barely go to the Moon, and going to Mars is almost an utopic enterprise. We don't have the technology nor the resources (or even the life span needed) to travel to another solar system, and we never will.
There is good info here about Gliese 581c, for which I thank you. But the video is also riddled with errors:
@3:13: "If the Sun was a red dwarf and we LIED at the same distance from it..." then we would be liars. 'Lied' is the past tense of the verb 'to lie' which means to prevaricate. It is NOT the past tense of the verb 'to lie' which means to be recumbent or occupy a position. The past tense of that verb is 'lay'. My Bonnie lies over the ocean today, She lay over the ocean yesterday. She has lain over the ocean since her untimely death. While 'lay is the past tense of 'to lie, it is not the past tense of 'to lay', meaning 'to place something down. My hen lays an egg almost every day. she laid one today and on yesterday. In the past week, she has laid 6 eggs. She is a good layer, but not a liar.
The second error in that quote is the use of 'was' for the subjunctive. The sun is not a red dwarf. If it WERE, the Earth would be frigid.
A Mars-sized planet is not called 'subterranean' (8:54), but 'sub-terran'. If it were subterranean, it would be underground and, therefore, in another planet, perhaps as a very large meteorite.
What IS your native language?
The illustration with magnets is misleading because the phenomenon that HARPS detects is the 'doppler method' which depends on the fact that the star and its planet co-rotate about their common center of gravity on opposite sides thereof. When, from our perspective, the planet is on one side of its orbit, moving directly away from us, the star is on the opposite side, moving ever so slightly toward us. The light from the star is slightly blue-shifted. When the positions are reversed, the light from the star is slightly red-shifted. The 'S' in ''HARPS' is for its 'spectrograph' which can measure that difference and help us deduce the relative masses of the bodies and the distance of the planet.
Nevertheless, I enjoyed the video.
Red dwarf lifespan should be lower than our star so it don’t really make sense to change if we even can
What is a kelvin?
What is a celseaus
What about Cuba Librae?
So where’s a day ?
Very interesting video , thanks a lot. You say that we have found 60 habitables planets. Do you know how many of them turn around yellow dwarf like us?
I think in the future we are just going to there
Answer could be yes, I want to go there!, but that is an exciting answer, send an robut ship to explore where no man has gone before yes!
If this planet is going to be Humanities new home, then scientists should give it a new name in the future.
Terra Nova?
@@SandsOfArrakis
Sounds boring
@@skipperofschool8325 what name would you give it?
@@bricoach9332
Idk yet
but, when naming it, we should use something that's unique to that particular planet
for example, Earth would be better if it were named after its entire-planet-spanning inhabitants like Caerula Smartmonke (just example, not srs)
It’s sad that we have to leave our planet
There are habitable planets that are bigger than Jupiter.
I think icon of this channel has changed recently.🤔
Exactly, do you like the new logo ?
Yeeeees sir!!
And not just logo, it's way more than that.
Reasons why Gliese 581c sucks
1- it orbits a red dwarf
2- it’s definitely tidally locked
3- little or no magnetic field
4- gravity is 50% higher
I believe the star that has the most suitable planet for us is Nacho Librae
On thing seems wrong here. This planet is bigger than ours, and as such could have correspondingly more gravity. If we attempt to go there and land, at what point is crashing due to gravity going to happen instead, or at what point is a landing one way only, with rockets designed for earths gravity, not being powerful enough to lift off again.
In all the talk on exoplanets no one has ever eliminated any for this reason, yet it's a big consideration. Is any info available showing at what mass larger than earth this cut off point exists. If so what is it???? 🙄🤨😗😎
So virtually you just found krypton
I believe the planet will probably look like a bigger version of the moon
Distances are too vast for such travel, and nothing but massless photons will ever approach light speed -- which is excruciatingly slow in comparison to interstellar distances. If we ever find ET, we'll learn his origin is right here in our enormous-but-tiny Solar system.
“Guh-lees”?
RED DWARF the space travelling ship with a lazy Captain year i watched the movie😅
Yes
I thought, if we look at the stars, we look at the light they made millions of years ago (depending, on how far they are away). If we search NOW for other planets, we actually see the PAST of them, correct? Imagine, we find now the second earth, but its 20 or 50 lightyears away, also imagine we can now jump to the planet in 1 hour (imagine!!) could it be, that the planet is already destroyed / the sun is too large / the planet is too cold because he moved away? I mean our data is from the past since the light took 20 years to move from there to us. In 20 years many things could change, see on our earth (deserts, forests...) also almost got hit by large asteroids.
20 light years from us. .... so would it take a million or a HUNDRED MILLION YEARS to get there?
I think 200 years
HELL NO 788 YEARS IM GOOD
Oh nice
For Gliese 581C sake I hope not . #wemessedupourplanetnowwewantyours
Maybe this is the planet where Saitama lives
This would be an interesting planet to visit, but not move there, unless no other option existed at the time, like the Taliban taking over the whole Earth!! Seriously, or maybe Sirius-ly (see what I did there) I've been a "space case" since I was a teen growing up in the Apollo NASA years. Exciting times, as are these, with the recent exoplanet search. Good stuff to come so I can't get too excited about an "over the skis" statement like you made calling this "our new home ?". WAAAAAAYYYYYYY to early for that, but I understand "click bait" on this subject, even Anton uses it!! So far, the more I hear folks like you declaring they (astronomers) have found "another earth-like planet" the more I like the Earth-like Earth. But keep trying, you astronomers, even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut!! LOL. Soooo,.....Go James Webb! Unless we divert all NASA's tiny budget to "refugee resettlement efforts" in America. :D
Our new home is in heaven, a place where our lord Jesus went and prepared for us. His works is all done but saints are not ready. Jesus is coming soon , repent and accept Jesus Christ as lord and savior.
no, They are a place with giants insects.
our new home? and yet we cant even get out of this solar system 😅😅😅 what of there is already a civilization more advance than us residing there,,? is it still our new home,? maybe earth will be there new home.. hahaha
The human arrogance... Claiming other planets like we own the fucking universe.
_Our new home?_
LOL, no.
Is live possible on Glise 581c? No. Why? Because of his host star... It's Red Dwarf. Red Dwarfs are very unstable, so they blow up often. It blows once, and whole live on every planet of its system gonna be obliterated.
You mean flares? They don't blow up. 😀
@@SandsOfArrakis Ehh.. Yes, like everything in vaccum of space. Simply im not an English native speaker, and just I forget a word :D
@@mrrrglllrrr that's ok :) I'm not a native English speaker either. 😀
body already livinf thefr
There is no new home.
Gliese 581c has 5 times the mass of the earth. Say bye bye to your joints and spine.
Oh lord please save me from Red Dwarf youtube posts.
Sounds good until the red dwarf star decides to grow. In time this planet will be cooked.
Why would we want to go and live on another planet and tear it up like we did our own ? It makes no sense !
While you make a valid if pessimistic argument, if we are only one one planet we are an asteroid strike away from being totally extinct.
@@brianwhiting3280 We may be the only civilized society over thousands of light years. Extinction would be a real shame, don't you think?
@@davidmacphee8348 even if we aren't it would still be a shame.
You were wrong. I do regret it.
With current technology apparently it would take 32000human years to travel 1 light year.
Do the math :))
Jesus, 640,000 years
It’s pronounced “Gleesa not Gelise”
cool
Pretty damn 😎
Being an EXO-L
👏👏👏
@Jeffrey Epstein you're my hero
Can I have your island?
@@australien6611 cash rules
Museum -/_phan oil planets
Gliese needs democracy
.
Lol
who cares, god is what we should focus on, in the name of Jesus lets us pray for we not know what we do