Any chance to have a look at the Z-Motor ( _[stepper_z]_ and _[tmcXXXX stepper_z]_ ) Config? 🤔 I like to print Multi Color Parts with the Wipe Tower set to _No Sparse Layers ( Beta )_ requiring extensive Z-Axis Movement but going beyond 30mm/s ( on the currently still 24V running Drivers ) produces a *_GNARLY™_* sound with my Configs 🤨
I'm not either, but in this case, I can see how it would be way better. Quieter on fast z travel to pick up new heads and way quicker. Would shave a significant amount of time off of a print.
@@micahmorton Having the tools on the same Z level like the WP-DAKSH toolchanger is the fastest as far as I know: ruclips.net/user/shortsoVKzbHdnnDI It's a shame that it's not (yet) picked up by the community and relies on one person for development and updates. For that reason, I still can not decide if I would go for a fixed bed, or a moving bed. I would prefer the second option, it's way more efficient and stable construction wise.
The z-axis sound made by the motor(s) is incredible, music to my ears
that is really cool man
this is wild! Props to you!
Amazing
Neat!
I love this setup! Can I ask what was your choice of X Endstop? Did you go sensorless? Please, I need to know.
OH thats sick, are you running 48v on the z-axis
Could you give a link to the project?
And what is the toolhead and extruder?
Any chance to have a look at the Z-Motor ( _[stepper_z]_ and _[tmcXXXX stepper_z]_ ) Config? 🤔
I like to print Multi Color Parts with the Wipe Tower set to _No Sparse Layers ( Beta )_ requiring extensive Z-Axis Movement but going beyond 30mm/s ( on the currently still 24V running Drivers ) produces a *_GNARLY™_* sound with my Configs 🤨
Running 24v
[printer]
kinematics: corexy
max_velocity: 400
max_accel: 14000
minimum_cruise_ratio: 0.5
max_z_velocity: 200
max_z_accel: 300
square_corner_velocity: 10.0
[stepper_z]
step_pin: PF11
dir_pin: PG3
enable_pin: !PG5
rotation_distance: 40
gear_ratio: 80:16
microsteps: 32
#endstop_pin: PG10
endstop_pin: probe:z_virtual_endstop
position_max: 302 #255
position_min: -2
homing_speed: 10
second_homing_speed: 1 #4
homing_retract_dist: 2 #0.65
homing_positive_dir: false
[tmc2209 stepper_z]
uart_pin: PC6
interpolate: false
run_current: .8
sense_resistor: 0.110
stealthchop_threshold: 0
Is tool changing stable and consistent or have you experienced any issues?
Not a huge fan of the gantry on z but this is super cool
That’s just how corona work
I'm not either, but in this case, I can see how it would be way better. Quieter on fast z travel to pick up new heads and way quicker. Would shave a significant amount of time off of a print.
@@micahmorton Having the tools on the same Z level like the WP-DAKSH toolchanger is the fastest as far as I know: ruclips.net/user/shortsoVKzbHdnnDI
It's a shame that it's not (yet) picked up by the community and relies on one person for development and updates.
For that reason, I still can not decide if I would go for a fixed bed, or a moving bed. I would prefer the second option, it's way more efficient and stable construction wise.