Winky - I've watched several RUclips videos on this topic. Yours is the simplest way I have seen. You also got the best result. I think I'll try it on one of my old chucks. Thank you for sharing.
Yeah... I've done the same with the dremel. It took hours and I burned up my Dremel. I think this actually worked better for me and it was certainly much faster.
@@geoffmorgan6059 Just bought another Dumore 44-011 for 400, hardly used Needs a new cord. Valuable tool for any lathe work IMHO. Also there is a guy on Ebay that sells a bracket to convert a die grinder to a tool post grinder .
@@WinkysWorkshop But you will have more tool deflection with carbide and if the jaws are uneven to start with you will not likely get the deflection or tool pressure even by the time you are finished as a grinder would do. Boring it is certainly better than leaving it alone as you showed but grinding it will give you better results.
@@phillhuddleston9445 I have had exactly the opposite experience. Either method works but the grinder has more deflection and takes much longer. If the boring bar is used correctly (square to the cut) there is almost no deflection. Grinding wheels have three aspects that effect this deflection. First the wheel is round and and the jaw will try to push the wheel away. Second, the bearing in the grinder will always have clearance and third, a tool post grinder usually has a small diameter shaft. Of course the 3rd reason depends on the grinder. You can always tell about how much defection you are getting by making a second cut without a change in cutting depth. If you are removing stock on the second pass the previous pass was deflecting. Repeated passes with either method will result in good results but the grinder will need more passes than the boring bar.
@@WinkysWorkshop The grinder will need more passes but you can let it spark out and you can not do that with a carbide inserted boring bar, if the grinding wheel is dressed right and you have a decent tool post grinder the tool pressure and deflection will be minimal. If you are trying this with a half worn out pneumatic die grinder then you will likely get poor results, either way I'm glad it worked to your satisfaction, it's far better than when you started.
@@phillhuddleston9445 It could be that technically the grinder would be more accurate. Certainly the finish would be a little better. However I was probably within .001" which is good for any 3 jaw, especially when there's a .004 to .005 error throughout the clamping range.
I did the same with my Asian lathe, but I used a Dremel type grinder mounted to the tool post, jaws unloaded. It became a little better. now I usually wrap a piece of .010" card stock around the shafting, and it gets it very close. I use the card stock to even out the contact along the axis of the chuck and it is much improved from whence I bagan. Enjoyed the video, especially after watching the chit chat on Harold's channel. Cheers!
So cool... glad you saw the chit chat... that was a first for me. Yeah... I was somewhat concerned about evening the pressure but after I flipped the aluminum pieces I realized the jaws were clamping fairly accurately. I figured the aluminum might compress a little if the pressure was a little different but maybe not... either way it worked great. Maybe even better than I think... I need to check it with good shafting. I actually used a dremel on this chuck and one other a few years ago. It helped but the boring bar worked way better... much faster too. Also... I burned up my dremel. I think they have a two chuck limit! Ha
Thanks for the idea. I used a hardened ring, about 2.5" ID to hold the jaws in tension. Then a boring bar to lightly clean up the jaws. Got the runout to .002" two inches from the chuck. Much better than it was. Thanks again.
Congratulations for yr shrewd and simple way to load the chuck while still keeping the jaws accessible to the boring bar for being remachined. Very informative!
Tried this method on my 9x37 Chinese lathe and got it within .0015 at 2 inches from the chuck! I'll take that any day! Thanks Winky for the posting and take care!
If you have .0015 on a 3 jaw chuck that’s good. I have made up aluminum soft jaws for some 3 jaw work that requires removing parts to work around the problem. One thing I noticed is you took light cuts and had a stiff bar, so that’s why that worked out as well as it did. The plus is your not introducing grinding grit to your lathe
Most dowel pins are hardened and ground...you have to go out of your way to screw them...caution some dowels have flats to allow air to escape a hole...don't clamp on the flat.
Well done!, When I went thru the same process on my small bench lathe I used a steel ring around the outside of the jaws first. Then I did your method just in case there is a difference when chucking something o.d. vs i.d. I used my shop made tool post grinder with a 1/4" diamond burr. I work on firearms so I need a little smaller radius. Thanks for the vid!, Gerry
Thanks, I've used a grinder in the past but it was a dremel tool. I had better luck with the boring bar plus my dremel has a 2 chuck limit.... I burned it up. I'm sure a better grinder would have worked well.
Thank you for sharing this method with us, it worked perfectly for resurrecting my 3 jaw with bell mouth. It allowed for a grind of the inside and outer surfaces of the jaws with repeatable precision being the scroll was good.
I'm surprised the boring bar cut it. I built a grinder attachment for my tool post. covered the ways and just ground the jaws. they are still about .003 out I may could do better but like you said the scroll is likely worn on mine as well.
Carbide will cut fairly hard steel. The jaws are harder than a drill but nothing like HSS or case hardening. In this case it cut very well. I have also used a grinder. It took a LONG time and I learned that my Dremel has a two chuck limit - Ha
Awesome, thank you! Just a heads up. This procedure gets mixed results. It worked well for me but others have said it didn't help. The way I see it, if a chuck is really in bad shape then it's worth trying.
You should remove the jaws and hit the beveled sides with an oil stone to knock off any burrs. Bluing the contact face of the jaws will let you see if you have machined the full length of the jaws. Glad it worked for you. I use a tool post grinder.
Grinding the chuck jaws, (or turning them in the case of soft jaws), is about all you can realistically do to refurbish an old worn chuck. I've found that there's usually some wear between the chuck body and the scroll plate register that allows some inconsistency but sometimes just using the chuck key in a different tightening bevel may show a marginally better result. My first lathe had a 3 jaw Self Centering chuck that was so worn out that I found it less frustrating to use the four jaw independent chuck instead. It was two years before I could afford a new 3 jaw but by that time I'd learned to appreciate the superior holding power and the accuracy of the four jaw. My new three jaw was accurate to better than 0.001" on ground MS or silver steel bar but the old four jaw independent could even better this if it was ever needed. Your use of aluminium spacers to hold the jaws apart when turning is a good idea too. Some turners use a steel ring gripped at the back 1/8" of the jaws. (The step being turned away afterwards)
The only thing I don't like about the ring in the back is where the load is. I think the load needs to be closer to center. One viewer suggested a different method... it sounded interesting. If you see the video next week you'll know it worked. Hehe
❤ nice tips we use a high speed grinder (30000 rpm) with 6 mm collet chuck and use a small short piece off pipe and first clamp it in the bottom of the chuck then move the pipe to the front and then grind the back inside i think it is important to clean the chuck spiral screw well before you start👍
Ya technology changes ,,,, the paper my dad worked at for years went under through mismanagement after it was bought out by Thompson Media . As far as presses catching on fire the pit under the press was a 12 x 60 pit 7 feet deep full of newsprint , grease and ink . Once in a while someone would flick a cigarette into pit and start a fire . I enjoy your videos keep them coming , all the best ED
Great idea. Is there a possibility there was a slight variance in the width of the aluminum flat bar which may have shifted the jaws slightly off? Just a thought. Thanks for sharing.
Very nice Mark. The ring/spider has always given me "must be a better way" second thoughts. This way you are on the inside edge of the scroll and tightening in as most chucks are used most if the time. And best if all the jaws are fully cut. Plus you don't have to mask off the bed from the grinding grit! Looking forward to seeing if the other method mentioned works as well. Ron
Some have said the hardened jaws will not cut... it worked well for me. Maybe some jaws are too hard but I do know that mine are hard. a drill will not touch then.
Most cold rolled steel is within .002", most 3 jaws are .015" or more. This is not a perfect way to fix a chuck but the objective is to make it better not perfect. Most 3 jaws vary in error with diameter when they are new.
Mount a precision ground bar in an accurately aligned tailstock and apply a very small amount of grinding paste to it. lightly clamp the jaws down and run at the slowest speed while moving the tailstock in and out. This will true up your jaws perfectly ( or as good as anything within the limits of your average 3 jaw chuck).
Hmmm... I like that idea. I wonder if the bar needs to be harder than the chuck jaws? Heck, you might find a real fine diamond coated bar too. Now you got me thinking!
IME it doesn't need to be hard as the paste does the work so roundness and alignment are the major criteria . It's crucial also to move the bar in and out to create an even surface.
@@johngriffin641 Thanks, I'm fairly happy with my current results but you method will probably be better. I'm sure your method takes a while so a combination of both might also be good.
If you have one bar that must run true for a special job try placing paper shims under one or more of the jaws. After a few tries indicating you can usually get the bar true within .002 TIR.
Great result! I wish that I could think of another way to immobilize the jaws, because I imagine that there must be some equalizing of pressure, some small displacement, by gripping on the sides of the jaws. And while I am wishing, I might as well wish for a tool post grinder, too!
I started to drill the jaws and install a roll pin but then realized that the jaws were hardened. I was going to make the pins clamp on a shorts piece of pipe. The aluminum pieces are still putting 1/3 the pressure outward and 1/3 on each side of the jaws (I think). Also, I used a grinder on jaws two times.... cutting with a boring bar worked way better
I didn't see anything ground in the video. Replace the word in the title with turn or machine. For best results use a set of soft jaws or soft jaw attachments and turn them to your diameter even if the scroll is worn uneven the work will run perfectly. 40 years master toolmaker, cheers
Had a set of 3 hard jaws EDM-'drilled'. Could thereafter bolt soft steel or aluminum to them clamp on a near-net-size piece of scrap and bore to desired diameter.
Yes the jaws are VERY hard. I was going to put roll pins in the jaws and clamp on a ring but I could not drill them. This worked fantastic. Yes it was a carbide insert in the boring bar
@@WinkysWorkshop I do like the method; it saved an otherwise barely usable chuck. Thanks for the explanation. Some tough carbide that it did not chip on the interrupted cut. What inserts were used? I could use the same treatment on my SB 9 bell-mouthed chuck. On more accurate stuff I use collets so it does not bother me all that much (yet).
Good - Was a bit of working getting it setup and finding a boring bar rigid enough that would for a 4" chuck, but got to within 0.0006" runout. 5/5 would do this again.
hi wink,i did my chuck a while back,and it worked pretty good,i use a piece of black pipe which i cut into a one inch ring,that i placed n the jaws and tightened the jaws on it,work great....stay safe my friend.
Good idea to use aluminum which will deform enough to even out the difference between the jaws. You’d get slightly better results if you clamped the shims out near the face of the jaws.
Hey there, If you look at about 3:24 where you put the wrench on your tool post and give it a yank. The whole thing moved quite a bit. That would affect your cutting tool stability and finished results. Thanks for the vid though.
Could you put an out ring on the chuck teeth and OPEN it, putting them under pressure and then do the same. or NO, wrong "dynamic" you want to be squeezing in?
Nice work! Thanks for the video. I would be super happy if my 3-jaw chuck was only .002" off. You commented about possible uneven loading of the jaws in that the sacrificial aluminum was only about 1/4" thick. What if you had a 3/4" square aluminum bar? Or even a rectangular piece? I guess one could stack up several pieces and screw them together to get a thicker piece too. I would like to true up the 3-jaw on my 1918 Oliver lathe. It has about a 12" diameter chuck.
@@WinkysWorkshop Look on eBay and I'm sure you can grab a size plug somewhere around 1.00. They should be straight as an arrow and it doesn't matter if the OD is perfect. I like your channel.
I tried this method over and over and over to a point where i had to take the jaws to the mill and restore their geometry to a point where i can try again few more times. I dont seem to get any consistency using boring bar possibly because my lathe is smaller chinese junk and results in too much flex. The best i've got was 10 1000's Looking for a better way to do this. Maybe a diamond round in the tool holder ?
I've had mix results myself. Your jaws might be harder then mine were but more likely the wear is different or even the shape of the jaws. The trick is to put the jaws under load as if they are holding work and that's hard to achieve. You might try putting the aluminum plates closer to the tips of the jaws but that's just a guess. It sounds like you have taken a lot of metal off already... maybe not worth taking a chance on.
Was that you or were you in the group? I was trying to remember the name when I was making the video. I was going mention this. To be honest I have done this before using a similar method but using aluminum and cutting it with the boring bar was way easier.
@@TheKnacklersWorkshop I need to take notes... I got a list of names from Harold but the the channel names are different. I have a hard time remembering 6 or 8 names but 16 is worse.
I tried it a with a dremnel attached to my cross slide, grinding the Jaws it did well but I did have the same issue at first.. a few times and it came much more true..but the scroll seems warn too.. but smart move with the aluminum wedges,, I might try with steel wedges to deal with deformation.. also thinking of cutting the scroll with a cnc to true it up
@@WinkysWorkshop if I can work out the spiral shape,,create the path in cad and do some test runs. it might work..I already do some precision cutting in plastic and wood and aluminum for ribbon microphones I make....but for simply grinding just around the scroll surface just to true it up lightly it might work.. maybe I have to start a service..
@@WinkysWorkshop don't worry...what I have is just hobby stuff..im old school and that's why I love your channel...but I max out what I have as well... im good at hacking out my way through life being smart like you... i just happen to have a cheap hobby cnc system I'm thinking of hacking for the scroll..it's an old Chuck I don't care about so if I screw it up so what..I will learn somthing..I learn a lot from you too so thanks
Those old Logan chucks (I think) were made by Kalamazoo Chuck Co. They were light duty new and the years have been unkind to them. I suspect you have some scroll wear, too. You can confirm this if after you true things the way you did (good work by the way!) by checking different diameters of decent round stock. If what I suspect, each different diameter will exhibit a different TIR- i.e. The chuck will not "repeat". I discovered this with a brand new high dollar Buck-Fokardt Adjust-a-Tru chuck (5" dia.). The chuck could be adjusted for any given diameter within its capacity to less than 0.001", but put in a different size and the chuck had to be retuned. I spoke with Buck about that and their answer was "live with it"!
@@WinkysWorkshop I hope that I can make me a shop also. Just love to machine things. Making something out of the raw state of metal. Nice work too. Peace
@@victoryfirst2878 Heck yeah... I love it. I've always made things but now that I have more tools only my imagination is the limit... well, maybe that's over stated but it's a good feeling. If I had life to do over I would buy the tools I wanted at a younger age. I put it off for various reasons but when you think about it even a used bridgeport mill is way less than some golf carts and clubs.
You may be right although I had better luck with the boring bar. Of course my grinder was a dremel and very wimpy. They have a two chuck limit also.. ha
when the chuck is worn its better to put your shims at the tip of the jaw's to help pivet the slack in the jaw slots not the scroll . i mite use steel shims. try wrapping 1 rap of paper on your 1" stock take a couple of heavy cuts on your stock ,inspect the paper to see if the marks are even from front to back. i drill a 1/4" hole in the face of the jaws insert pins chuck on a short piece of pipe with the pins, tight then bore or grind the jaws
I think the pins are a great idea but i didn't have a carbide drill. I tried drilling and it was too hard. As for the position of the shims, this chuck is very shallow. The shims were slightly toward the front of the jaws. I think its a little better to have the shims load the jaw evenly. To be certain 90% of the stock I removed was still toward the back of the jaw. I quit cutting when the insert started cutting at the tips of all three jaws.
Mark I may try this on my 3 jaw China chuck. I have been using a .750 dowel pin and on jaw #3 I am out minus -.004. Jaw #1 and jaw #2 are absolute zero.
That is strange. I think in order for this to work well the pressure needs to equalize. You might try cutting a slit part way through with a bandsaw in the aluminum. This will allow the aluminum to compress a little so the pressure is more even.
If you had bought a new Chinese chuck it probably would have been no better. Even top quality USA standard chucks are only about 0.001" if you want better than you have to buy a Grip Tru or similar at mega Bucks. Cost me $ 1200 for a 5 inch one Grip Tru and I had to make my own backplate. Well done and it looked like the boring bar lived to fight another day. Surprised the carbide did not break with the intermittent cut.
Cheap inserts too! I just took small bites. I have two chinese chucks that are actually slightly better but they are considerably deeper and too much overhang. This chuck works better for small spindle.
Another person I watched doing this used aluminum that was the full or near the full width of the exposed area of the jaws which would seem to impose a more uniform pressure over the clamping force area of the jaws and I would think result in a more uniform loading of the chuck and jaw gear teeth interface ?
You may be correct although it would be hard to get aluminum clamped inside the bore with a diameter large enough to get a boring bar inside. Most worn chuck (like mine) are what Mr. Pete calls Bird mouthed, meaning wider at the end of the jaw so I felt it was more important to load the jaws near the chuck.
I used a similar method on a very worn chuck, I found that I that using the "blocks" out at the outer edge of the jaws to obtain a parallel cut, the rock in the jaw meant that when the blocks are close to the body of the chuck it left the jaws conical. Cheers, Matthew
Conical as in bird mouthed? Mine is slightly the other way. Tightened just snug the jaws were tight in the front or ends and loose in the back. Firmly tightening resolved this.
@@WinkysWorkshop Yes, bird mouth, my chuck was 70years old! the jaws rocked, worn with a high spot in the middle! Although it was much improved, it had come to the end of it's life, I didn't have the outside jaws, so it really was time to replace. here's a video I did on grinding the jaws, it might interest you! ruclips.net/video/zofS-ewP4Zs/видео.html
@@MatthewTinker-au-pont-blanc Hmmm... I ended up with exactly the opposite although if I tighten the chuck firmly it goes away. After watching your video I suspect the stone was larger toward the the grinder motor and that you didn't go deep deep enough to grind the back of the jaw with the full diameter of the stone. Of course this is just a guess, its hard to know for sure from the video.
@@WinkysWorkshop Thanks for watching my video! The stone cleared the back of the jaws, when I put the "blocks" in the nose of the chuck, as far a possible from the face, I got a nice parallel cut, please note this was on a 70 odd year old chuck that had had a lot of use! I was just pointing out a possibility! Cheers Matthew
@@MatthewTinker-au-pont-blanc - Interesting... I don't doubt what you say, I was just trying to get a better understanding. Your approach might be the best and maybe I didn't get an event cut due to deflection of the boring bar.. Also, my chuck was made in 1942. It could also be related to chuck construction.
Very random viewer here, did you verify that the nose of the lathe was running true before you mounted the chuck? A lathe that old might have bearing issues that would trump anything you did to the chuck.
I have a South Bend 9c with a 5" three jaw chuck, I ground it true, but the problem was a stretched scroll, so any other size stock it was off. I was able to buy a made overseas 6" chuck for $140. Sometimes you just got to get out the checkbook and save yourself a lot of grief.
I retired from a printing company two years ago. I have no formal training. I ran a press until moved me into a job troubleshooting the web offset presses and stacking machines. I did this job the last 15 years before i retired. The job morphed into redesigning presses and stackers in problem areas. I had the pleasure of working with some very good machinists and a engineer although sometimes the engineer was more of an obstacle. He used to say, "that won't work". Occasionally he offered a better method but most often I just proved him wrong. He was a very good engineer but I think I was seen as a threat. The first several years I was in the job all machine modification had to be cleared by the engineer. The day my boss said, just do it and forget about getting approval was the day I started making real positive changed. It didn't pay very well considering I was basically doing an engineer job but, I enjoyed my job and most people can't say that!
@@thrustprop67 - I enjoyed aspects of printing and for sure the machine design job but the company I worked for was poorly run. The first 20 years were okay but after that a bunch of investors took over that didn't understand the process. Ink and fountain solution contracts went to the cheapest supplier, maintenance was cut, crew sizes were cut and then they bought new presses and from Goss because they were able to run 3000 FPM. The company expected then to run as advertised but we didn't have the materials and expertise to make it happen. Plus, even with good material and proper maintenance the presses were poorly engineered. Cut back on crews and maintenance and.... sh__ hits the fan. We had several unit fires were bearing went bad and at one of out plants all 4 units of and 8 unit 72-inch press burned up in a big fire. These presses were the newest of the bunch but they leaked so much oil and had tons of ink mist so there was a good supply of fuel under the units. Of course I should feel lucky, that's why my job was created, to fix the near impossible without spending money. Ha. Currently the company is in bankruptcy and the plant I worked at closed. We used to employ 1300 people but when it closed 800 lost their job.
Good idea ,,, you probably thought of this but watch ebay ,,, it could have been the stars were aligned right or something but I bought a 10 "set tru bison 3 jaw hardly used for $200 US ,, the liquidator didn't know what he had but I could tell from the pics
When I was just starting out as a machinist , I noticed this problem that you are having with your 3 jaw chuck . I asked my employer , who was a 3rd generation machinist , what could be done to remedy the problem , and he told me to " Just get used to it " . I asked "why " He said that as long as I was using a Plain 3 jaw chuck , There would ALWAYS be some amount of runout due to the inherent design of a scroll chuck , the scroll is not machined to perfection that you desire . it is what it is . If you want or need less runout from your chuck , you will have to use a 4 jaw chuck or a Buck chuck or a 6 jaw chuck or a collet . Since I started this path as a machinist , I have operated lathes built in 1900 to to modern CNC . lathes built in 1990 , that is almost 100 years of technological improvement & the plain 3 jaw chuck still has this same flaw .
some chucks the scroll is bevel cut, these cost a great deal more, they are known as precision chucks, I just mounted a 16 inch on my french mounting, by counterboring the removable back of the chuck, I made it a press fit, wrong thing to do as I cannot tap the chuck into alignment, although I got it within 2 thou on the dia. and zero runout on the face, but the jaws are bad, 25 thou bad although they look ok, so I'll try your way, was there a reason you bored inside to outside
Yes I would love to have a precision chuck. I just bought a ER40 collet chuck which will expand my options however. I probably should have bored toward the headstock but the other direction works almost as well. On this chuck there is only about a 1/2" behind the jaws and I didn't want to run the bar in too far. By boring away from the chuck I was able to use a solid carriage stop.
I've never investigated this completely but you install a different change gear. You have to leave the half nut engaged and reverse the lathe between each pass. It's a bit of a pain. You can cut many matric thread with the standard gears if you simply want threads for a nut. The nut is short enough that the error is not an issue. I assume you are cutting threads for a collet nut? You might want to check them with an SAE thread gauges. You might get lucky.
Watch out for tool deflection, I tried to cut a set of hardened chuck jaws like this and it would always come out tapered. A quick grind and they were much better.
Interesting... I had much better luck with the boring bar. I was cutting on the way out at first but made that last 4 or 5 passes going in. The TCMC insert is fairly sharp so most the cutting was going on the leading edge. And the last 4 or 5 passes no correction was made. Overall I'm pleased although less is always better.
I suspect any carbide will work although a sharp corners and slow feed probably help. This seems to be hit or miss. It worked well for me but I've heard other say it did not help much. I guess it depends on what is worn. Just take enough to take a little off to get the whole surface of the jaws and then test the results. I hope it works well.
Ive done that many time, but i did use a grinder in tool post. When you try and cut those somewhat hard jaws, you get to much deflection that follows the runout..
This is close to making soft jaws , anyway when I do inside I use a ring on the outside to tension ,and a pin for when I do the outside . Beware of the radius it leaves behind thow
When using a ring I get taper on the jaw face, so I start with a ring with out jaws too pull a few thou off the interior jaws. Remove ring reinstall jaws and load the back jaws, then turn too that point.
Much better to drill a small hole on the front of each jaw, insert three little bolts with heads and clamp the heads in on a steel ring about 50mm diameter with a 6-8 wall thickness about 5mm long held at the very front and then lightly grind. This will machine the jaws the way they need to be done by putting max spread on the outer tips of the jaws.
Interesting. I always felt like the outward pressure needed to approximate the jaws clamping the work piece. But you might be right. Worn jaws are usually at the tip. This did help the chuck but it was far from perfect.
The reason why the 1 inch bar was not indicating true and the 7/8 did has to do with the Radius of contact to the work piece is not equal, you bored it to one inch but the deflection of the bar and the hardness of the jaw made the Bore Dia like .990 . The Radial contact, Jaw to bar, is on the outer edge of the cleanup of the Jaw surface which you can hear the evenness when boring. The smaller piece has a smaller Radial contact which is evenly centered on all 3 jaws to the work piece . If you would bore the Jaw 1.010 or larger then the radial contact would be in the center. ** Also the positioning of pressure to hold the jaw in place is best closer to the edge of the jaw then against the chuck.** ------Sorry to get technical but it makes a difference.
You are correct about the radius. However, even after cleanup the flat created at the jaw tips was probably .040". I'd have to do some weird math to know for sure but the difference between the outer contact area and the center is likely only about .001". Lets be realistic, this repair is not a complete fix regardless. .005" to .010" runout would still be a big improvement. I agree with the ideal location (toward the tips) to load the jaws although many have stated that the force needed to be deeper in the chuck.
If the jaws are out of register because of worn spots on the scroll, what happens when you chance onto a good spot with all the jaws cut to a different length?
I see... that would make sense. I use the full range of my 3-jaw , sometimes it’s off and sometimes its dead on. I read Audel’s machinery handbook by Frank Graham, and he says not to remove the work piece until it’s done because you’ll never get it back in there the same way. The way he writes you get the impression he’s not a big fan of self-centering chucks, much more friendly towards turning between centers or a 4-jaw. A friend told me years ago how to true up a chuck the way you were doing, only he used a washer in the back of the jaws. But all I have is hss and it just bounced off those jaws. I learned to live with it, sort of like when your wife has a small flaw...
@@richardmaurer9002 - Ha... yeah, you have to accept some flaws especially from your wife. I have the Audel books... I need to read them more although every time I open one I get stuff for an hour at least. One of the people commenting on this video suggested another method and I'm going to try it. If it works there will be a video by next weekend.... if you don't see it, it didn't work!
Winky - I've watched several RUclips videos on this topic. Yours is the simplest way I have seen. You also got the best result. I think I'll try it on one of my old chucks. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks! I was please with the way it turned out
Thank you for this video. My chuck is so way out of true.
I never had good results doing it like that. I switch over to a dremel with a round stone to grind the jaws. Glad it worked out for you.
Yeah... I've done the same with the dremel. It took hours and I burned up my Dremel. I think this actually worked better for me and it was certainly much faster.
Buy a Dumore Tool Post Grinder
@@pwddogman Can't argue but you can purchase three new adjust-a-tru chucks for the cost of a new tool post grinder.
@@geoffmorgan6059 Just bought another Dumore 44-011 for 400, hardly used Needs a new cord. Valuable tool for any lathe work IMHO. Also there is a guy on Ebay that sells a bracket to convert a die grinder to a tool post grinder .
@@pwddogman -Fortunately I have a Dumore Series 55. I have just noticed that the prices are over the top. I think you got a very good deal!
This is great stuff! If the scroll is worn, error will vary with diameter. If jaws are too hard to bore, use an air grinder. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for the tips! An air grinder would be good however carbide will cut most hardened jaws i think.
@@WinkysWorkshop But you will have more tool deflection with carbide and if the jaws are uneven to start with you will not likely get the deflection or tool pressure even by the time you are finished as a grinder would do. Boring it is certainly better than leaving it alone as you showed but grinding it will give you better results.
@@phillhuddleston9445 I have had exactly the opposite experience. Either method works but the grinder has more deflection and takes much longer. If the boring bar is used correctly (square to the cut) there is almost no deflection. Grinding wheels have three aspects that effect this deflection. First the wheel is round and and the jaw will try to push the wheel away. Second, the bearing in the grinder will always have clearance and third, a tool post grinder usually has a small diameter shaft. Of course the 3rd reason depends on the grinder. You can always tell about how much defection you are getting by making a second cut without a change in cutting depth. If you are removing stock on the second pass the previous pass was deflecting. Repeated passes with either method will result in good results but the grinder will need more passes than the boring bar.
@@WinkysWorkshop The grinder will need more passes but you can let it spark out and you can not do that with a carbide inserted boring bar, if the grinding wheel is dressed right and you have a decent tool post grinder the tool pressure and deflection will be minimal. If you are trying this with a half worn out pneumatic die grinder then you will likely get poor results, either way I'm glad it worked to your satisfaction, it's far better than when you started.
@@phillhuddleston9445 It could be that technically the grinder would be more accurate. Certainly the finish would be a little better. However I was probably within .001" which is good for any 3 jaw, especially when there's a .004 to .005 error throughout the clamping range.
I did the same with my Asian lathe, but I used a Dremel type grinder mounted to the tool post, jaws unloaded. It became a little better. now I usually wrap a piece of .010" card stock around the shafting, and it gets it very close. I use the card stock to even out the contact along the axis of the chuck and it is much improved from whence I bagan. Enjoyed the video, especially after watching the chit chat on Harold's channel. Cheers!
So cool... glad you saw the chit chat... that was a first for me. Yeah... I was somewhat concerned about evening the pressure but after I flipped the aluminum pieces I realized the jaws were clamping fairly accurately. I figured the aluminum might compress a little if the pressure was a little different but maybe not... either way it worked great. Maybe even better than I think... I need to check it with good shafting. I actually used a dremel on this chuck and one other a few years ago. It helped but the boring bar worked way better... much faster too. Also... I burned up my dremel. I think they have a two chuck limit! Ha
Hello, just used this method on my Colchester bantam chuck.
It worked well, improved 7 thou to less than 2 thou. Thank you.
John.
Excellent!
Thanks for the idea. I used a hardened ring, about 2.5" ID to hold the jaws in tension. Then a boring bar to lightly clean up the jaws. Got the runout to .002" two inches from the chuck. Much better than it was. Thanks again.
Yeah... lots of different way to do this. Thanks for watching!
Congratulations for yr shrewd and simple way to load the chuck while still keeping the jaws accessible to the boring bar for being remachined.
Very informative!
Thanks, it's not perfect but it seemed to improve the chuck a lot.
Tried this method on my 9x37 Chinese lathe and got it within .0015 at 2 inches from the chuck! I'll take that any day! Thanks Winky for the posting and take care!
Yeah, not too bad. You're welcome!
If you have .0015 on a 3 jaw chuck that’s good. I have made up aluminum soft jaws for some 3 jaw work that requires removing parts to work around the problem. One thing I noticed is you took light cuts and had a stiff bar, so that’s why that worked out as well as it did. The plus is your not introducing grinding grit to your lathe
Very true... I have ground several chucks and this work better. Certainly faster!
Saving time in machining is very important specialy when you have a lots of projects! Thanks
Very true! Thanks
I acquired a 3/4" dowel pin to check my runout. Any large dowel should be good. It eliminates the stock inaccuracies. Nice job. The Logan lives on!
Ha... Yeah, I didn't want to give up on the chuck. I need to get some dowel pins!
@@WinkysWorkshop Standards are ok but I wouldn't want to mess them up.
Most dowel pins are hardened and ground...you have to go out of your way to screw them...caution some dowels have flats to allow air to escape a hole...don't clamp on the flat.
@@larryrestainer9949 Yes Larry, the flats are used when pressing a dowel into a blind hole, which is not recommended.
@@WinkysWorkshop An End Mill is a good substitute until you get some.
Easiest way to grind a chuck I ever saw
It seems to work although it's not perfect. It will at least make the chuck better.
Well done!, When I went thru the same process on my small bench lathe I used a steel ring around the outside of the jaws first. Then I did your method just in case there is a difference when chucking something o.d. vs i.d. I used my shop made tool post grinder with a 1/4" diamond burr. I work on firearms so I need a little smaller radius. Thanks for the vid!,
Gerry
Thanks, I've used a grinder in the past but it was a dremel tool. I had better luck with the boring bar plus my dremel has a 2 chuck limit.... I burned it up. I'm sure a better grinder would have worked well.
Two thousandths is about as good as I have seen a 3 jaw chuck. Good job there Winky.
No kidding, I love the .002" Thanks
Looks like a great success !
It's something I've never looked at on my lathe - or any lathe!
Thanks 👍 Yeah... this chuck had a lot of runout
Thank you for sharing this method with us, it worked perfectly for resurrecting my 3 jaw with bell mouth. It allowed for a grind of the inside and outer surfaces of the jaws with repeatable precision being the scroll was good.
Thats great, its not a perfect fix but it certainly helps
I'm surprised the boring bar cut it. I built a grinder attachment for my tool post. covered the ways and just ground the jaws. they are still about .003 out I may could do better but like you said the scroll is likely worn on mine as well.
Carbide will cut fairly hard steel. The jaws are harder than a drill but nothing like HSS or case hardening. In this case it cut very well. I have also used a grinder. It took a LONG time and I learned that my Dremel has a two chuck limit - Ha
I've enjoyed a number of your videos but this one made a subscriber of me. Thank you.
Awesome, thank you! Just a heads up. This procedure gets mixed results. It worked well for me but others have said it didn't help. The way I see it, if a chuck is really in bad shape then it's worth trying.
You should remove the jaws and hit the beveled sides with an oil stone to knock off any burrs. Bluing the contact face of the jaws will let you see if you have machined the full length of the jaws. Glad it worked for you. I use a tool post grinder.
There is no question I hit the full length of the jaw, easy to see. I agree about the tips. Thanks!
really enjoyed the way that worked out to fix jaws. I have seen some people use a stone, butt really screwed up the jaws.
Cutting seems to work better for me.
nice, have seen all the grinding ideas, this is the best idea for me with a very inaccurate chuck, thanks.
Glad to help. The boring bar worked better for me... easier and faster too.
Grinding the chuck jaws, (or turning them in the case of soft jaws), is about all you can realistically do to refurbish an old worn chuck. I've found that there's usually some wear between the chuck body and the scroll plate register that allows some inconsistency but sometimes just using the chuck key in a different tightening bevel may show a marginally better result.
My first lathe had a 3 jaw Self Centering chuck that was so worn out that I found it less frustrating to use the four jaw independent chuck instead. It was two years before I could afford a new 3 jaw but by that time I'd learned to appreciate the superior holding power and the accuracy of the four jaw. My new three jaw was accurate to better than 0.001" on ground MS or silver steel bar but the old four jaw independent could even better this if it was ever needed.
Your use of aluminium spacers to hold the jaws apart when turning is a good idea too. Some turners use a steel ring gripped at the back 1/8" of the jaws. (The step being turned away afterwards)
The only thing I don't like about the ring in the back is where the load is. I think the load needs to be closer to center. One viewer suggested a different method... it sounded interesting. If you see the video next week you'll know it worked. Hehe
Can't argue with the results. Big improvement.
Yes i was pleased. Thanks
❤ nice tips we use a high speed grinder (30000 rpm) with 6 mm collet chuck and use a small short piece off pipe and first clamp it in the bottom of the chuck then move the pipe to the front and then grind the back inside i think it is important to clean the chuck spiral screw well before you start👍
That would probably work very well.
Ya technology changes ,,,, the paper my dad worked at for years went under through mismanagement after it was bought out by Thompson Media . As far as presses catching on fire the pit under the press was a 12 x 60 pit 7 feet deep full of newsprint , grease and ink . Once in a while someone would flick a cigarette into pit and start a fire . I enjoy your videos keep them coming , all the best ED
Thanks Ed!
Great idea. Is there a possibility there was a slight variance in the width of the aluminum flat bar which may have shifted the jaws slightly off? Just a thought.
Thanks for sharing.
This is very true. although the aluminum is thin enough to average out a little. It's not prefect but I don't think there is a perfect method.
Very nice Mark. The ring/spider has always given me "must be a better way" second thoughts. This way you are on the inside edge of the scroll and tightening in as most chucks are used most if the time. And best if all the jaws are fully cut. Plus you don't have to mask off the bed from the grinding grit! Looking forward to seeing if the other method mentioned works as well.
Ron
"of all"
Some have said the hardened jaws will not cut... it worked well for me. Maybe some jaws are too hard but I do know that mine are hard. a drill will not touch then.
Would it help if you turned your test bar first so you are working with a round part? Good video.
Most cold rolled steel is within .002", most 3 jaws are .015" or more. This is not a perfect way to fix a chuck but the objective is to make it better not perfect. Most 3 jaws vary in error with diameter when they are new.
Mount a precision ground bar in an accurately aligned tailstock and apply a very small amount of grinding paste to it. lightly clamp the jaws down and run at the slowest speed while moving the tailstock in and out. This will true up your jaws perfectly ( or as good as anything within the limits of your average 3 jaw chuck).
Hmmm... I like that idea. I wonder if the bar needs to be harder than the chuck jaws? Heck, you might find a real fine diamond coated bar too. Now you got me thinking!
IME it doesn't need to be hard as the paste does the work so roundness and alignment are the major criteria . It's crucial also to move the bar in and out to create an even surface.
@@johngriffin641 If I do a follow up video can I use your name in the video to give you credit for the idea. I like it
@@WinkysWorkshop No problem
@@johngriffin641 Thanks, I'm fairly happy with my current results but you method will probably be better. I'm sure your method takes a while so a combination of both might also be good.
If you have one bar that must run true for a special job try placing paper shims under one or more of the jaws. After a few tries indicating you can usually get the bar true within .002 TIR.
Yes that works well, I have done this several times.
Great result! I wish that I could think of another way to immobilize the jaws, because I imagine that there must be some equalizing of pressure, some small displacement, by gripping on the sides of the jaws. And while I am wishing, I might as well wish for a tool post grinder, too!
I started to drill the jaws and install a roll pin but then realized that the jaws were hardened. I was going to make the pins clamp on a shorts piece of pipe. The aluminum pieces are still putting 1/3 the pressure outward and 1/3 on each side of the jaws (I think). Also, I used a grinder on jaws two times.... cutting with a boring bar worked way better
There are other ways. Its called a spider
I didn't see anything ground in the video. Replace the word in the title with turn or machine. For best results use a set of soft jaws or soft jaw attachments and turn them to your diameter even if the scroll is worn uneven the work will run perfectly. 40 years master toolmaker, cheers
Sounds even easiest!
No disrespect intended but this video was about fixing a chuck not replacing it.
Use a 4 jaw and indicate!
Had a set of 3 hard jaws EDM-'drilled'. Could thereafter bolt soft steel or aluminum to them clamp on a near-net-size piece of scrap and bore to desired diameter.
I like the jaw suport idea. Looks like the jaws were not hardened. Was it a carbide tool cutting the jaws?
Yes the jaws are VERY hard. I was going to put roll pins in the jaws and clamp on a ring but I could not drill them. This worked fantastic. Yes it was a carbide insert in the boring bar
@@WinkysWorkshop I do like the method; it saved an otherwise barely usable chuck. Thanks for the explanation. Some tough carbide that it did not chip on the interrupted cut. What inserts were used? I could use the same treatment on my SB 9 bell-mouthed chuck. On more accurate stuff I use collets so it does not bother me all that much (yet).
@@milantrcka121 It's a Chinese TCMT 21.51 insert. The interrupted cut isn't an issue as long as you take small bites.
cool - thanks - I truly appreciate the lesson.
My pleasure! Thanks for watching
Nice idea,what was the cutting tool,HSS or carbide ?
For sure carbide.
Thanks for sharing the ideas. Love your videos.
Glad you like them! And your welcome
Good - Was a bit of working getting it setup and finding a boring bar rigid enough that would for a 4" chuck, but got to within 0.0006" runout. 5/5 would do this again.
Thats great and much cheaper than a new chuck
Looks like it defiantly helped. Good Job!
Yeah I was pleased with the results! Thanks
You are so far ahead of me that I’m surprised that you don’t have a piece of ground drill rod for taking those measurements.
That would be better although no 3-jaw is super accurate throughout it's clamping range so cold rolled is good enough.
hi wink,i did my chuck a while back,and it worked pretty good,i use a piece of black pipe which i cut into a one inch ring,that i placed n the jaws and tightened the jaws on it,work great....stay safe my friend.
Hello Ray, that's great! One viewer offered an alternative method that might take this to the next level, we'll see. Watch fo an upcoming video.
Hi Winky, what size Vice do you use in your RF-30 Mill?
I think i't a 6 inch.
Good idea to use aluminum which will deform enough to even out the difference between the jaws. You’d
get slightly better results if you clamped the shims out near the face of the jaws.
You may be right about that.
Hey there, If you look at about 3:24 where you put the wrench on your tool post and give it a yank. The whole thing moved quite a bit. That would affect your cutting tool stability and finished results. Thanks for the vid though.
Wow... you are looking hard. You might also notice that before I started cutting I went in and then back out which removed the backlash you saw.
Could you put an out ring on the chuck teeth and OPEN it, putting them under pressure and then do the same. or NO, wrong "dynamic" you want to be squeezing in?
Exactly. This is not perfect buy it usually improves a worn chuck.
I have one of those
Thanks for taking your time for us to see the way to work it
No problem 👍
What type of an insert did you use to turn them gels down?
A boring bar but I can't remember the insert number. Any would work really.
Enjoyed your video , you gave me some valuable insights thanks!
Glad to hear it!
Nice work! Thanks for the video. I would be super happy if my 3-jaw chuck was only .002" off. You commented about possible uneven loading of the jaws in that the sacrificial aluminum was only about 1/4" thick. What if you had a 3/4" square aluminum bar? Or even a rectangular piece? I guess one could stack up several pieces and screw them together to get a thicker piece too. I would like to true up the 3-jaw on my 1918 Oliver lathe. It has about a 12" diameter chuck.
I used 1/8" thick aluminum. On edge it is very strong. You might want to go with 1/4" on the larger chuck.
Nice work.
Great idea.
Thank you, EM.
Any time! Apparently this is somewhat hit and miss. Several have commented that it didn't work well for them.
If you have a decent "V" block it might be helpful to verify the runout of your "test piece" to make sure that it's not out of round.
I'll find a dowel pin somewhere
@@WinkysWorkshop Look on eBay and I'm sure you can grab a size plug somewhere around 1.00. They should be straight as an arrow and it doesn't matter if the OD is perfect. I like your channel.
@@BELCAN57 Thanks, Somebody suggested a wrist pin. I'll get one from a friend of mine
I have the same chuck on my logan 825. I may try to get this done as well. Simple enough.
Let me know how it works for you.
I tried this method over and over and over to a point where i had to take the jaws to the mill and restore their geometry to a point where i can try again few more times.
I dont seem to get any consistency using boring bar possibly because my lathe is smaller chinese junk and results in too much flex.
The best i've got was 10 1000's
Looking for a better way to do this. Maybe a diamond round in the tool holder ?
I've had mix results myself. Your jaws might be harder then mine were but more likely the wear is different or even the shape of the jaws. The trick is to put the jaws under load as if they are holding work and that's hard to achieve. You might try putting the aluminum plates closer to the tips of the jaws but that's just a guess. It sounds like you have taken a lot of metal off already... maybe not worth taking a chance on.
Sometimes you just got to try something, that's the way most things are achieved.
Agree. It's not a perfect fix but usually improves a worn chuck.
Hello Mark,
I wonder where you got the idea to do it that way - lol...
Take care.
Paul,,
Was that you or were you in the group? I was trying to remember the name when I was making the video. I was going mention this. To be honest I have done this before using a similar method but using aluminum and cutting it with the boring bar was way easier.
@@WinkysWorkshop no not me Mark but I was there on Sunday when it was spoken about...
@@TheKnacklersWorkshop I need to take notes... I got a list of names from Harold but the the channel names are different. I have a hard time remembering 6 or 8 names but 16 is worse.
Mark can you do this on hardened Jaws?
So some degree my jaws were hard. I'd say it depends on the degree of hardness. You'll just have to try and see if it works.
I tried it a with a dremnel attached to my cross slide, grinding the Jaws it did well but I did have the same issue at first.. a few times and it came much more true..but the scroll seems warn too.. but smart move with the aluminum wedges,, I might try with steel wedges to deal with deformation.. also thinking of cutting the scroll with a cnc to true it up
Wow... cutting the scroll would be a challenge.
@@WinkysWorkshop if I can work out the spiral shape,,create the path in cad and do some test runs. it might work..I already do some precision cutting in plastic and wood and aluminum for ribbon microphones I make....but for simply grinding just around the scroll surface just to true it up lightly it might work..
maybe I have to start a service..
@@chuckthebull I'm 99% manual machines. I do little cad but no CNC
@@WinkysWorkshop don't worry...what I have is just hobby stuff..im old school and that's why I love your channel...but I max out what I have as well... im good at hacking out my way through life being smart like you... i just happen to have a cheap hobby cnc system I'm thinking of hacking for the scroll..it's an old Chuck I don't care about so if I screw it up so what..I will learn somthing..I learn a lot from you too so thanks
Those old Logan chucks (I think) were made by Kalamazoo Chuck Co. They were light duty new and the years have been unkind to them. I suspect you have some scroll wear, too. You can confirm this if after you true things the way you did (good work by the way!) by checking different diameters of decent round stock. If what I suspect, each different diameter will exhibit a different TIR- i.e. The chuck will not "repeat". I discovered this with a brand new high dollar Buck-Fokardt Adjust-a-Tru chuck (5" dia.). The chuck could be adjusted for any given diameter within its capacity to less than 0.001", but put in a different size and the chuck had to be retuned. I spoke with Buck about that and their answer was "live with it"!
A real nice lathe fella. Good day too.
That's nice of you to say, thanks!
@@WinkysWorkshop So nice of you to show a simple way of straightening out the three jaw chuck for us all on RUclips.
@@victoryfirst2878 I love making the videos now that I am retired. Plus I'm improving my shop at the same time.
@@WinkysWorkshop I hope that I can make me a shop also. Just love to machine things. Making something out of the raw state of metal. Nice work too. Peace
@@victoryfirst2878 Heck yeah... I love it. I've always made things but now that I have more tools only my imagination is the limit... well, maybe that's over stated but it's a good feeling. If I had life to do over I would buy the tools I wanted at a younger age. I put it off for various reasons but when you think about it even a used bridgeport mill is way less than some golf carts and clubs.
For a perfect job grinding is the best
You may be right although I had better luck with the boring bar. Of course my grinder was a dremel and very wimpy. They have a two chuck limit also.. ha
when the chuck is worn its better to put your shims at the tip of the jaw's to help pivet the slack
in the jaw slots not the scroll . i mite use steel shims. try wrapping 1 rap of paper on your 1"
stock take a couple of heavy cuts on your stock ,inspect the paper to see if the marks are even from front to back. i drill a 1/4" hole in the face of the jaws insert pins chuck on a short piece of pipe with the pins,
tight then bore or grind the jaws
I think the pins are a great idea but i didn't have a carbide drill. I tried drilling and it was too hard. As for the position of the shims, this chuck is very shallow. The shims were slightly toward the front of the jaws. I think its a little better to have the shims load the jaw evenly. To be certain 90% of the stock I removed was still toward the back of the jaw. I quit cutting when the insert started cutting at the tips of all three jaws.
Mark I may try this on my 3 jaw China chuck. I have been using a .750 dowel pin and on jaw #3 I am out minus -.004. Jaw #1 and jaw #2 are absolute zero.
That is strange. I think in order for this to work well the pressure needs to equalize. You might try cutting a slit part way through with a bandsaw in the aluminum. This will allow the aluminum to compress a little so the pressure is more even.
Smart, how is the runout on other diameters after turning the jaws?
I testes 1/2", 3/4" 1" 1-2/4" and they were all under .0025. I guess my scroll is still in good shape.
What kind of insert geometry worked well for you?
It was a TCMT 21.51 insert.
@@WinkysWorkshop Thanks Wink
@@dizzolve You're welcome, thank you for watching!
If you had bought a new Chinese chuck it probably would have been no better. Even top quality USA standard chucks are only about 0.001" if you want better than you have to buy a Grip Tru or similar at mega Bucks. Cost me $ 1200 for a 5 inch one Grip Tru and I had to make my own backplate. Well done and it looked like the boring bar lived to fight another day. Surprised the carbide did not break with the intermittent cut.
Cheap inserts too! I just took small bites. I have two chinese chucks that are actually slightly better but they are considerably deeper and too much overhang. This chuck works better for small spindle.
Another person I watched doing this used aluminum that was the full or near the full width of the exposed area of the jaws which would seem to impose a more uniform pressure over the clamping force area of the jaws and I would think result in a more uniform loading of the chuck and jaw gear teeth interface ?
You may be correct although it would be hard to get aluminum clamped inside the bore with a diameter large enough to get a boring bar inside. Most worn chuck (like mine) are what Mr. Pete calls Bird mouthed, meaning wider at the end of the jaw so I felt it was more important to load the jaws near the chuck.
I used a similar method on a very worn chuck, I found that I that using the "blocks" out at the outer edge of the jaws to obtain a parallel cut, the rock in the jaw meant that when the blocks are close to the body of the chuck it left the jaws conical. Cheers, Matthew
Conical as in bird mouthed? Mine is slightly the other way. Tightened just snug the jaws were tight in the front or ends and loose in the back. Firmly tightening resolved this.
@@WinkysWorkshop Yes, bird mouth, my chuck was 70years old! the jaws rocked, worn with a high spot in the middle! Although it was much improved, it had come to the end of it's life, I didn't have the outside jaws, so it really was time to replace. here's a video I did on grinding the jaws, it might interest you! ruclips.net/video/zofS-ewP4Zs/видео.html
@@MatthewTinker-au-pont-blanc Hmmm... I ended up with exactly the opposite although if I tighten the chuck firmly it goes away. After watching your video I suspect the stone was larger toward the the grinder motor and that you didn't go deep deep enough to grind the back of the jaw with the full diameter of the stone. Of course this is just a guess, its hard to know for sure from the video.
@@WinkysWorkshop Thanks for watching my video! The stone cleared the back of the jaws, when I put the "blocks" in the nose of the chuck, as far a possible from the face, I got a nice parallel cut, please note this was on a 70 odd year old chuck that had had a lot of use! I was just pointing out a possibility! Cheers Matthew
@@MatthewTinker-au-pont-blanc - Interesting... I don't doubt what you say, I was just trying to get a better understanding. Your approach might be the best and maybe I didn't get an event cut due to deflection of the boring bar.. Also, my chuck was made in 1942. It could also be related to chuck construction.
Very random viewer here, did you verify that the nose of the lathe was running true before you mounted the chuck? A lathe that old might have bearing issues that would trump anything you did to the chuck.
Yes, the bearings are perfect. Welcome to the channel!
I have a South Bend 9c with a 5" three jaw chuck, I ground it true, but the problem was a stretched scroll, so any other size stock it was off. I was able to buy a made overseas 6" chuck for $140. Sometimes you just got to get out the checkbook and save yourself a lot of grief.
I have a couple chinese chucks One is excellent, one is good and the other two not so good. Oddly the best one was only $89.
ya ,, it's cool how it came at the time I needed it ,,, I'm curious what kind of work do you do for a living,,, I was a shop teacher in Ontario,Canada
I retired from a printing company two years ago. I have no formal training. I ran a press until moved me into a job troubleshooting the web offset presses and stacking machines. I did this job the last 15 years before i retired. The job morphed into redesigning presses and stackers in problem areas. I had the pleasure of working with some very good machinists and a engineer although sometimes the engineer was more of an obstacle. He used to say, "that won't work". Occasionally he offered a better method but most often I just proved him wrong. He was a very good engineer but I think I was seen as a threat. The first several years I was in the job all machine modification had to be cleared by the engineer. The day my boss said, just do it and forget about getting approval was the day I started making real positive changed. It didn't pay very well considering I was basically doing an engineer job but, I enjoyed my job and most people can't say that!
@@WinkysWorkshop My dad was a printer all his working life . He started with lead type process and say it go offset . He too enjoyed his job .
@@thrustprop67 - I enjoyed aspects of printing and for sure the machine design job but the company I worked for was poorly run. The first 20 years were okay but after that a bunch of investors took over that didn't understand the process. Ink and fountain solution contracts went to the cheapest supplier, maintenance was cut, crew sizes were cut and then they bought new presses and from Goss because they were able to run 3000 FPM. The company expected then to run as advertised but we didn't have the materials and expertise to make it happen. Plus, even with good material and proper maintenance the presses were poorly engineered. Cut back on crews and maintenance and.... sh__ hits the fan. We had several unit fires were bearing went bad and at one of out plants all 4 units of and 8 unit 72-inch press burned up in a big fire. These presses were the newest of the bunch but they leaked so much oil and had tons of ink mist so there was a good supply of fuel under the units. Of course I should feel lucky, that's why my job was created, to fix the near impossible without spending money. Ha. Currently the company is in bankruptcy and the plant I worked at closed. We used to employ 1300 people but when it closed 800 lost their job.
Why didn't you use thicker stock that went the entire depth of your jaws so you had a continuous cut, not an interrupted one?
One key to making this work is the spacer being able to deform under pressure.
Good idea ,,, you probably thought of this but watch ebay ,,, it could have been the stars were aligned right or something but I bought a 10 "set tru bison 3 jaw hardly used for $200 US ,, the liquidator didn't know what he had but I could tell from the pics
Very cool on the Bison
Wow, that’s almost free compared to a new one. Like the beautiful Monarch lathe that “Always Sunny in the Shop” bought for something like $2,500.
Never thought I could do that.
Go for it.
Picked up a 915 with a 3 jaw that's basically trash. Did something similar a couple days ago. Better than nothin!
Yeah... it isn't perfect but it helps!
When I was just starting out as a machinist , I noticed this problem that you are having with your 3 jaw chuck . I asked my employer , who was a 3rd generation machinist , what could be done to remedy the problem , and he told me to " Just get used to it " . I asked "why " He said that as long as I was using a Plain 3 jaw chuck , There would ALWAYS be some amount of runout due to the inherent design of a scroll chuck , the scroll is not machined to perfection that you desire . it is what it is . If you want or need less runout from your chuck , you will have to use a 4 jaw chuck or a Buck chuck or a 6 jaw chuck or a collet . Since I started this path as a machinist , I have operated lathes built in 1900 to to modern CNC . lathes built in 1990 , that is almost 100 years of technological improvement & the plain 3 jaw chuck still has this same flaw .
Yep, and I can live with .002 but .015" was too much. Someday I'll get some collets.
some chucks the scroll is bevel cut, these cost a great deal more, they are known as precision chucks
Thanks for your idea all❤👌👍👏🤝
Welcome 😊
great idea thanks for sharing
You're welcome, thanks for watching!
some chucks the scroll is bevel cut, these cost a great deal more, they are known as precision chucks, I just mounted a 16 inch on my french mounting, by counterboring the removable back of the chuck, I made it a press fit, wrong thing to do as I cannot tap the chuck into alignment, although I got it within 2 thou on the dia. and zero runout on the face, but the jaws are bad, 25 thou bad although they look ok, so I'll try your way, was there a reason you bored inside to outside
Yes I would love to have a precision chuck. I just bought a ER40 collet chuck which will expand my options however. I probably should have bored toward the headstock but the other direction works almost as well. On this chuck there is only about a 1/2" behind the jaws and I didn't want to run the bar in too far. By boring away from the chuck I was able to use a solid carriage stop.
Hey, just as a question, how i can turn metric threads on that lathe? I'm thinking about making a Collet chuck.
I've never investigated this completely but you install a different change gear. You have to leave the half nut engaged and reverse the lathe between each pass. It's a bit of a pain. You can cut many matric thread with the standard gears if you simply want threads for a nut. The nut is short enough that the error is not an issue. I assume you are cutting threads for a collet nut? You might want to check them with an SAE thread gauges. You might get lucky.
@@WinkysWorkshop alright, thx
@@WinkysWorkshop also, dp u know if the spindle has a Morse taper?
@@Lucas_sGarage Yes, its a MT-3 I believe.
@@WinkysWorkshop thx
Watch out for tool deflection, I tried to cut a set of hardened chuck jaws like this and it would always come out tapered. A quick grind and they were much better.
Interesting... I had much better luck with the boring bar. I was cutting on the way out at first but made that last 4 or 5 passes going in. The TCMC insert is fairly sharp so most the cutting was going on the leading edge. And the last 4 or 5 passes no correction was made. Overall I'm pleased although less is always better.
Worked great for me!
That's great!
Just did it again on an old Logan chuck!
What a great idea.. id have never thought of it either... Lol.
Its not perfect but it works fairly well.
Did you use a special insert for the hard steel of the jaws?
Just read some threads about the insert.....Will give this a try on my Myford ML10.
I suspect any carbide will work although a sharp corners and slow feed probably help. This seems to be hit or miss. It worked well for me but I've heard other say it did not help much. I guess it depends on what is worn. Just take enough to take a little off to get the whole surface of the jaws and then test the results. I hope it works well.
hi Mark,nice video,thanks for sharing
Glad you enjoyed it Thanks
That worked well, thanks for sharing.
Thanks Steve!
Nice approach
Thanks, it worked great!
Great Tip, Mine is at .018 so that will have to help.
Glad it helped
good work , Easy to do to .. ENJOYED !
Thanks a lot!
You need to be doing this with a tool post grinder.
I've done both. The boring bar is much faster and in most cases just as accurate.
Why not use a 1 inch end mill shank? Hardened and ground.
a boring bar is cutting in a very small area. A mill would have too much surface area.
Great, simple fix.
Indeed! Thanks
Ive done that many time, but i did use a grinder in tool post.
When you try and cut those somewhat hard jaws, you get to much deflection that follows the runout..
That sound logical but honestly this worked better than grinding for me.
This is close to making soft jaws , anyway when I do inside I use a ring on the outside to tension ,and a pin for when I do the outside . Beware of the radius it leaves behind thow
I think you get better results if the jaws are loaded inward when you grind of cut the ID of the jaws
When using a ring I get taper on the jaw face, so I start with a ring with out jaws too pull a few thou off the interior jaws. Remove ring reinstall jaws and load the back jaws, then turn too that point.
After looking again that doesn't appear to have flippable jaws so that wouldn't work.
Much better to drill a small hole on the front of each jaw, insert three little bolts with heads and clamp the heads in on a steel ring about 50mm diameter with a 6-8 wall thickness about 5mm long held at the very front and then lightly grind. This will machine the jaws the way they need to be done by putting max spread on the outer tips of the jaws.
Interesting. I always felt like the outward pressure needed to approximate the jaws clamping the work piece. But you might be right. Worn jaws are usually at the tip. This did help the chuck but it was far from perfect.
The reason why the 1 inch bar was not indicating true and the 7/8 did has to do with the Radius of contact to the work piece is not equal, you bored it to one inch but the deflection of the bar and the hardness of the jaw made the Bore Dia like .990 . The Radial contact, Jaw to bar, is on the outer edge of the cleanup of the Jaw surface which you can hear the evenness when boring. The smaller piece has a smaller Radial contact which is evenly centered on all 3 jaws to the work piece . If you would bore the Jaw 1.010 or larger then the radial contact would be in the center.
** Also the positioning of pressure to hold the jaw in place is best closer to the edge of the jaw then against the chuck.** ------Sorry to get technical but it makes a difference.
You are correct about the radius. However, even after cleanup the flat created at the jaw tips was probably .040". I'd have to do some weird math to know for sure but the difference between the outer contact area and the center is likely only about .001". Lets be realistic, this repair is not a complete fix regardless. .005" to .010" runout would still be a big improvement. I agree with the ideal location (toward the tips) to load the jaws although many have stated that the force needed to be deeper in the chuck.
If the jaws are out of register because of worn spots on the scroll, what happens when you chance onto a good spot with all the jaws cut to a different length?
1/2", 3/4" 1.25" 1.5" are all good so that's not too bad!
I see... that would make sense. I use the full range of my 3-jaw , sometimes it’s off and sometimes its dead on. I read Audel’s machinery handbook by Frank Graham, and he says not to remove the work piece until it’s done because you’ll never get it back in there the same way. The way he writes you get the impression he’s not a big fan of self-centering chucks, much more friendly towards turning between centers or a 4-jaw. A friend told me years ago how to true up a chuck the way you were doing, only he used a washer in the back of the jaws. But all I have is hss and it just bounced off those jaws. I learned to live with it, sort of like when your wife has a small flaw...
@@richardmaurer9002 - Ha... yeah, you have to accept some flaws especially from your wife. I have the Audel books... I need to read them more although every time I open one I get stuff for an hour at least. One of the people commenting on this video suggested another method and I'm going to try it. If it works there will be a video by next weekend.... if you don't see it, it didn't work!
I have done this a few times.Use steel or brass stops aluminum is to soft.
It's soft but I had the chuck plenty tight and it never crushed the aluminum.
But the chuck jaws look hard to me. A wonder how you can machine it!
They are hard but carbide does well. Maybe some chucks are harder. I know the jaws in this chuck can not be drilled with a standard HHS bit
who is this guy??
Winky
shouldn't you have used a ground bar ?
Without a doubt. I found a 3/4" bar after making the video and it was less than .0025
It does rely on the jaw chamfers being identical. Not sure how to check that though.
Actually the aluminum compresses and evens out the load. Maybe not totally but it helps.
@@WinkysWorkshop That's true enough
Good work. Always use inward pressure on the chuck jaws. I have seen some use a metal ring, and put outward pressure on the jaws.
Thats a good method but you have to put a pin in the jaws to clamp on the ring so that the jaw surface is unobstructed.