NYPD removes the piece of an airplane wing believed to have been part of an aircraft that crashed into the WTC on Sept. 11. To License This Clip, Click Here: collection.cnn....
I can't even begin to imagine the absolute heartbreak for the families that to this day still don't have formal identification for their loved ones as there's either nothing left from incineration or it's too small to even test. Still such a surreal thing 20 years on.
@@jennyfurr I wondered if anything fell into the Hudson like pieces of the buildings that they never recovered I don’t think I ever came across anything saying that they checked either
@@tommybrown9534 there's still over a thousand that haven't been identified yet as there's only literal fragments of bone left that don't have a DNA profile thag can be used to identify them with. It's tragic for those families that don't have closure.
the only people who have issues with watermarks...are potential thieves. If I shot this or paid for someone to shoot it. No one else is getting it for free.
@@greensteinloud4982 if it was a prop they would have burned it more to make it more believable, or used something a little more recognizable as a plane part like a landing gear leg.
@@willj78are you guys okay? it literally says "PROP DEPT" on the tag. LMAO #publicIQcrisis!!!!!!!! also since you know their entire playbook then explain what happened to WTC6 & WTC7 which weren't impacted by any aluminum airliners. WTC7 somehow imploded. WTC somehow lost its entire core, rest intact! I mean no one is making this stuff up its all on video.
I’ve been lead to believe that many of those parts did not belong to those planes. Also saw doc of airline pilot who said that commercial airlines could not perform those flight maneuvers that those planes did. They would have broken up mid flight on their descent toward the towers. Had to do with the physics of the downward air drafts of a plane going that fast at such low altitude. They had to be military craft in order to accomplish that.
You can see that piece of debris in many of the second plane strike videos. Clearly a huge piece of something is ejected blocks ahead of the crash out the other side of the building.
LOL because no wing parts were ever found and the excuse given for no wing parts at the Pentagon was laughable because they said the wings folded up like a bird and went inside the Pentagon when in real life they would just shatter. And the cutouts made for the right wing in the North Tower was not long enough so parts of the right wing should have been all over the ground.
@@ocjon1965 Thanks but I doubted a passenger jet hit the Pentagon from day one but it took a little longer to see how they made us think a jet flew in Nuke York City.
@@RogerWittekind we all know the pentagon was hit by a missile ! All those cameras even at that time & we get a quick flash come on now ! They were made that the last flight got taken back over by the passengers all that killing & horror to start a war smh
To be carried out by the authorities even after all those years shows true means of respect to the victims. I'm surprised no treasure hunter or bozo found it and took it home with him. Incredible they found it wedged in between a couple of buildings 15 years later!
Totally true what you said, you nailed it, but even if an unscrupulous treasure hunter (or any other civilian) would of found it first, he or she would of still been totally compeled to inform the authorities, and of course could not have kept it nor much less try to auction or sell it, because not only would have that deporable scheme of trying to take it home and auctioning or selling it not had work, but also that person (or bozo) would have faced very serious federal criminal charges for it, any sane or rational person knows that. Only a special kind of idiot or bozo would of taken it home with him/her.
Up where I'm from in upstate New York near lake Huntington someone had beams from the south tower on their yard for like 3 years after the attacks. I still remember when homeland security showed up to take them
There are no people who deny planes (the specifics about the ‘planes’ is a different story) hitting the WTC, which is what this video is. However, there are people who have a strong suspicion (for all the good reasons) that the pentagon was not hit by a plane, but by a possible missile or something of the likes. Please do a bit of critical research. The truth never has any contradictions, lies and is never shy from sharing information and bringing closure to the victims’ families, America and the world.
JoMac well I expect a idiotic comment like that from a moron ! Tell me why a massive structure reinforced with massive steal housing the offices top to bottom .... How did a plane hitting the top sections release such massive amount of jet fuel causing wide spread fire straight up ..... How did that steal become weak enough to drop a tower from the bottom up ? Think those mini nukes seem exploding right as tower dropped help at all ? Yep days before they had workers on both towers ... That building was.built to take massive amounts of damages ...... Then tell me terrorist walked.on planes caring massive weapons, no red flags ..... Bullshit ! A plane did not hit the Pentagon, not one wing was found ! But sure found them at ground zero though . Stop being stupid go learn something! Btw , 3 trillion and a court date ring a bell ????
Portanto,Bush e companhia são os gajos bons,os politicos são todos uns tipos acusados injustamente,e devemos acreditar neles.Realmente aqui está mais uma prova credível em como aqueles atentados rituais ,foram mesmo praticados por terroristas de turbante e que beberam whisky americano antes de partirem para o martírio.Não foi inside jude job,as pessoas é que são umas parvinhas que vêm merda em tudo o que é sitio.Porra,já posso ir dormir descansado.
Good gravy, both of you belong to the same branch of monotheistic religion. Along with judaism. The same one that targeted, murdered, and tried to erase paganism thousands of years older than jesus’s first fart. You both took from the people you tried to erase; like your days of the week, wedding ceremony tying the knot,binding of hands only thing you both added was women can’t divorce and/or be stoned- since we are literally ‘blaming the child for the sins of the father’. So you all are terrible. And seemingly blinded by malice to learn your own history religious or otherwise you’ve made hatred your culture. P.s jesus was a jew, born in the middle east, and his image that is currently on the walls of churches being worshipped in u.s was modeled by an Italian, incestuous, murderous, ego driven son of the pope during the Italian renaissance- aka- an earlier hitler who wanted to be a god, and I guess got his wish. jesus was a sun scarred carpenter born from a minor girl. Definitely not a white, blue eyed, greek nosed chad. And I’m just bitching about western majority, not including the others.
YEA I NOTICED THAT - DONT WORRY SHES STILL GETTING PAID TO PRETEND. DONT WORRY! SHE WANTED TO TOUCH THE LOVELY SMELL OF AIRCRAFT DEBRIS SMMMMMMMMMMMMM AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
It's really not. All it took was imagination, and they had that imagination when they were building these towers and considered the ramifications of the largest passenger plane at that time hitting one of those buildings. Conspiracy nuts want to pretend that there's something strange about that when there absolutely isn't. It's basic planning and consideration for plausible scenarios.
Because you're ignorant about physics. The debris doesn't have to melt to satisfy your conspiracy theories. Plenty of metals are durable at even high temperatures
Literally every video- even remotely linked to 9/11- has these comments. People really are willing to die on stupid hills. I don't know whether to laugh or cry, tbh.
@@hidingposer3422 Why would there be a camera placed facing a random side of the building. I bet that the inside is littered with cameras on the other hand.
Alot of these comments I see make no sense about how all the plane peice's did not melt from the explosion. You do know so many parts did not stay in side the building they hit right? That peice's of the planes will break off soon as cockpit hit, peice's would have been inside building. And peice's shot out other side. I mean it's pretty simple how it works.
Then why when we watch the countless videos of the plane impact several in high definition in slow motion UC appsolutely 0 parts of the plane coming off anywhere outside of the building either on the impact side or the other side you can see for yourself
Because it wasn't in the building for more than a second, it was ejected during the crash. You'd know this if you bothered to do any checking instead of just believing your conspiracy nut friends.
james hallas oh no hurt feelings, don’t feed into the conspiracists, they are a buncha cunts, anywho I’ll try to find more videos with plane parts, I watched one earlier and I’ll look for it
Oh!!! my second favorite comments was about seeing half naked people around the area where the plane hit tower one. The person couldn't understand why they were half naked. Ya know, I have an idea. I bet it was flipping hot as Hell up there. It was hot enough to cause people to jump 100 stories to their death so I really bet that they were hot. You really should find something else to nit pick. Leave this alone!!!
@Kristie C my heart hurts for the people inside. They were probably choking with the smoke, and I bet it was horrible if it made them jump to their death. Apparently it was 800 degrees Celsius inside.
Amy White, they were taking there clothes off on purpose, go read Dr Judy Woods book " Where did the towers go" everyone wants to speculate and donot do any research. Leave it up to the EXPERTS is what I say. Also go watch " Alchemy 911" documentary
Conspiracy theorists rn are like “how could an aluminum plane cut through solid steel with no problem” while also being like “theres no way any part of the plane could have gotten knocked off the plane on impact, sounds fishy” like wtf make up your mind on what you want to argue
the planes totally went inside the footprint of the building, so for anything to come out, it would have to go all the way through the center of the building and shoot out the other side, so thats probably where people are casting doubts... even though they would have been going stupid fast.. fyi there is an interview with the towers designers and they said it was built to withstand a plane crash...
The plane is almost the entire width of the building. The central part where the lifts and stairwells were was hit by the nose/fuselage/body of the plane. The wings, which this is part of, avoided the central core. The buildings weren't built to withstand 757s loaded with jet fuel flying as fast as they were. Fucking passengers came out of the building, they found them on the rooftops, and they're not quite as robust as planes when it comes to hitting concrete and steel.
@@orbtastic ohh yeah so it didn’t used fuel from boston to new york all the amount of fuel as it was on the floor also has it before it hit the tower 🤣🤣🤣
@@orbtastic explain to me 1 thing if it was loaded why the north tower still remain firm while the south collapsed. The north tower remain firm on fire for an hour and 42 min and the south tower was gone and it was the last one that got hit by the plane . The plane hit the south tower 17 min after the north tower was hit and burning but still in shape and the south tower within an hour collapsed
@@luispeguero3266 Yes the planes used fuel to get to NY from the airports, are you seriously trying to say that they didn't hit the buildings with jet fuel on board?
Some bits went cannoning off blocks away. Same with the bodies on the plane, they found pieces of them on roof tops of other buildings years later. One woman on the street was hit with the landing gear/wheels from the first plane and practically lost half her body. The debris was scattered all over, way before the buildings came down.
It's not surprising at all. Numerous pieces of at least one of the planes was ejected from the building on impact. There's a very famous series of photos displaying one of the engines from flight 175 laying in Murray Street, further away from where this piece of landing gear from that same plane was found wedged between two buildings. Other photos show tires from the landing gear and other heavy parts of the plane. Casey Neistat has shared his experience from that day. He was staying in an apartment a block away from the towers and when it happened he walked out into the street and there was debris and body parts all over the place, with an EMT using blankets to cover them up. This was while Fire crews were still arriving at the towers and before the second plane hit. So, we know, for a fact, and confirmed by witnesses, that not only did plane debris fly from that building, but body parts did, also. This is why the people who claim a terrorist's passport can't have survived the crash are moronic. They want to claim that it's too "miraculous" that a lone passport was found when we know bodies were thrown, and we know that terrorist was on the plane. It's entirely plausible that they found that one passport in a pocket on one of those bodies thrown from the plane, because they would have been gathering all of that evidence immediately.
@@ct5625 damn dude. I had never even thought about that before. I think it was Atta's passport they found on the street. But picturing that he put his passport in his breast pocket, and him being in the very front of the plane as he's flying it, that's one of the first things (along with probably a chunk of torso) that's getting shot out the building at relatively the same speed the plane was traveling due to inertia. To be honest I've wondered about that, but what you said definitely makes sense. Thanks!
The powerful thing as well is the lack of response to your words. I agree with you..you know Its a weird sensation to have so many people seriously deny reality because they personally were not in NYC to see it in person. Those are the people that are most certain of everything. I somehow saw it happen and still feel less certain and more anxious about the world now.
@@c5mjohn Meep Dude really look at the photos they tell the evidence. Not one body not one piece of luggage no engines no airline seats were found at the site where the plane crashed into the ground. Also soil samples taken revealed no fuel in the ground........fact check with eyes cover your ears. Dont listen to what your told. Review the photos and use deductive reasoning. Research other plane crashes look at the debris that's left behind and compared to the debris that was found crash site
The worst thing that was peddled. That jet planes can do 500 mph at ground level, as they claimed. So why do we even fly at 40 000 feet when we can do it at a low altitude. I can’t believe people think this is real
It in Remarkable good shape after its gone through all that steel and concrete fell down that crack without even marking the sides the rope around the peace of landing gear you can see one side of the rope clearly on the right hand side on the left there is a white smudgy line to the left of that very faintly is the other side of the rope you can see the pattern in the rope
Philip Mccullagh - oh, youve OBVIOUSLY exposed a CONSPIRACY! You should run down to Washington with your evidence and bring those responsible to justice. lmao
Snk collection - oh you noticed the rope around the aircraft part that OBVIOUSLY was used to LOWER the part down between the buildings in a sneaky government attempt to plant evidence that aircraft really did destroy the WTC Towers and definetely was NOT wrapped around it to RECOVER it and secure the heavy component to the hand truck that they used to move it to the pickup truck. BRILLIANT! Just brilliant........lmao!
@@holdernewtshesrearin5471 Judy woods explained wtc in great detail. They use directed or free energy to blow the building. Debris of 110 floor building was just left with a pile. All the building was atomised and turns into dust.
@@rushiljohal yes my friend many people died that's why people need to look closely at the evidence and find those responsible. Do I know exactly what happened? No, but I DO know what couldn't have happened. Good luck.
Dr Judy wood wrote a book called “where did the towers go?” Answers to entire 40+ year conspiracy are pretty much summed up by “9/11: Alchemy” by wolf clan media
Hello I’m new to the comment section I thought that this might help to what The tag means, (property clerk division), which I also means that they safe guard any evidence that would be recovered
Theorists aren't playing with a full deck. They simultaneously believe an ultra powerful cabal of super genius super villains managed to secretly pull off one of the biggest crimes in human history, and also forgot to take a "prop" label off of an unnecessarily planted piece of evidence fifteen years after the crime lol
It is. It was jettisoned from the building when the plane impacted it, as was at least one engine and potentially several bodies (which is believed to be why they managed to find a passport of one of the terrorists, in his pocket, on what was left of his body after being thrown from the other side of the building).
I fucking hate it when retards try to deny we went to the moon. Way to piss on the lifetime achievements of thousands of better men not to mention the three astronauts killed in Apollo 1. Wankers
@@visionist7 I absolutely care about those killed in any event. However, too many coincidences happened in 9/11 for the official report to be what really happened. As for the moon landings, have you ever watched interviews with those old men who claimed to go to the moon? They can't handle the simple questions without getting angry. Van Allen belts would be enough to toast them all based on the evidence we have present day. It really is not much different that 9/11. A president who wanted or was forced to invent something in a race to beat their enemy to it. Or in the case of 9/11 as a way to get support for an unnecessary war that is still going on almost 2 decades later. I feel for those who lost their lives and their families but this government is as corrupt as it gets and it has been going on for a Century or so if not longer.
I have a hard time understanding how anyone could think that any part of this horrible horrible day was fake. If planes didn't hit the buildings then where did the planes go? I doubt they just disappeared. Plus some of the passengers were either talking to 911, airlines or family especially on the later two flights, they knew the score and I believe they knew their fate. Many inoscent people lost their lives or their loved one. It's disrespectful to try to say it didn't happen. Any of it!!! Oh and my favorite question I have found in these wonderful comments... Where did all the buildings and people go? Actually what they said was something like, if each floor is a certain height, then where is the rest of the buildings and people after the collapse or something like that. Well how's this.. You remember all the dust flying everywhere after the collapse. There's your building and your victims. Dust, pieces of flesh, paper, desks etc.. It was all mixed together. I saw interviews of first responders who said they could see flesh everywhere in the dust. But reguardless, I've read some horrible comments but just so you know 911 did happen just like they said. The only thing they were guilty of was not capturing those freaks earlier and preventing this from happening. May God bless everyone affected by this tragedy.
That's right !! All of the people on those flights/planes did not fake their own deaths.....People saying this was a controlled demolition, government inside job, CGI, no planes, ect,..is way beyond ridiculous !
jOE Marchand "Blind" ? Provide irrefutable evidence that the passengers faked their own deaths. Provide irrefutable, hard evidence to me that those United Airlines jetliners are not missing from their fleet, stolen, turned over willfully or whatever your wildest stretch to SPECULATION may be...If you believe it was a controlled demolition, the burden is yours to provide a logical explanation as to HOW an undertaking as large and elaborate as such could be accomplished in two structures of 50,000 workers and an average of 200,000 visitors per day without anyone noticing. Blind ? You say,....No, your imaginations and speculations are entirely your own and do not belong to me or the truth that which is only supported by facts that can be substantiated... Calling me blind is no legitimate argument and a foolish one at that.
@Brother Dude 1. The towers collapsed from the impact zones, not below. 2. They didn't fall at free fall. 3. Explosions? In a burning building? No shit, where you been? Notice that the firefighters didn't seem to find it odd... 4. Why would you expect a building to tip to the side? Gravity pulls downward. 5. The floors collapsed. Do you expect the floors to get up and jump out the window? Really? 6. After the floors collapsed you can see the columns standing several hundred feet for up to 30 seconds before they toppled over. Clearly not damaged at the bottom. I think you need a construction job...
Conspiracy theorists; if there were bombs in these buildings (both towers) don’t you think one of them if not more would’ve prematurely detonated prior to the plane crashes?
There are a lot of explosives which require other sources of energy to detonate. Also: If there were explosives it can be safely assumed that it was planned. Which implies they also knew about the plane impact zone and so could've moved the explosives into the non impact zone beforehand.
Steel beams did survive, I guess you haven't actually done any research at all because several of them are on display in numerous locations. Steel is WEAKENED by highly combustible jet fuel (shock!) and a building of that design cannot take the weight of 20 floors from above collapsing onto a lower floor, which caused the pancake effect as each floor collapsed under the growing weight falling from above. This is all explained by physics, you should look into that. Besides all the other educating I've delivered, you should know this piece of the plane was thrown several blocks from the impact (along with other plane parts photographed on the day and witnessed by people in the street who were almost killed by them) and numerous body parts of victims (again witnessed by numerous people). You guys love to scream "do your own research" when it seems none of you are capable of reading.
@@ct5625 yeah, that is it, I haven't done any research at all. You're also an idiot. I would dare you to try to burn steel of any kind with diesel fuel. please check back here and let me know how that goes. Before you talk to me about how a building would handle 20 floors on top collapsing, we need to explain how a jet flying into the building didn't have a single piece bounce off into the street, how the steel somehow melted perfect evenly in order to fall straight down, how a second building did the exact same thing and then later how a 3rd building that wasn't touched by the other two fell in exactly the same way the same day. I am not a conspiracy nut and I do research before I say stupid shit. Maybe this is a stupid idea, but when there are more than 50 glaring questions that have never been answered you have to at least question what you know. Add to all of this that we're watching our very government attempt these types of things in front of our faces today, it doesn't take a leap to see what they've done in the past. You probably also believe Jan 6 was an attack on our Capital by extremists. You'd be right there but it was the FBI that did the attack and there is so much proof out there you'd be a total fool to not see it.
Asks for an explanation for how a jet flying into the building didnt have a single piece exit the building. Posts it on a video showing a piece of the jet that had exited the building when the jet impacted.
@@mikero6225 People have analyzed that video clip and that engine didn't come from the jets that crashed. It also doesn't appear to have crashed through a building and fallen 80 stories to the street. There are so many things wrong with the entire story of 911 that it makes your head explode. Sorta like anyone believing the 2020 elections were not rigged.
Findings? Finding this UA175 piece was THE finding. A plane hit WTC2 and some of its fragments flew out toward north, landing on streets and in between buildings. What findings were you expecting to see? That a UFO hit the building?
Maybe made from the same material as the passport. This type of engine did not match one of the planes. Somebody dumped it an hour earlier so the police could find it. It came from a plane cemetary. Old news.
And I bet it was quickly whisked away to be sent for scrap recycling instead of being analysed from a crime scene. Just like the tons of steel at Ground Zero...
Imagine seeing the cockpit with the hijacker’s and their bodies ripped into pieces with blood everywhere. Would be very hard for the people having to deal with the cleanup
So per Boeing website a 767 has a max air speed of 433 mph. Video evidence show what is perceived to be a plane impacting tower 2 at 590 mph and only one video of the 1st impact hitting tower one at 465mph. Well above the airframes safety limits. The engines are designed to produce a certain amount of thrust at cruising altitude. Where the atmosphere is far less dense. At the altitude the planes impacted if we take the slower of the two planes the engines would have to have a minimum of 3 times the amount of thrust to be able to move the plane at that speed. This is fact you can do the math yourself. Not to mention the air intake would also have to be much larger to take in that much more air. Again air density.... Now John Lear. Son of the inventor of the Lear Jet ran a multitude of flight simulations with the Boeing 767. He took 9 Pilots three experienced with a 767-3 experienced with other large aircraft and three fresh out of Flight School. He said the flight simulator up for New York City set the air speed and plenty of distance from the towers to follow the same flight path that was recorded by radar that day. Each pilot was given nine tries to hit the building. Half the time the plane disintegrated midair due to the forces traveling that fast that that attitude with that then severe the other half of the time the plane was so all over the place it is damn near uncontrollable the pilots were fighting to keep the plane from crashing into the ground let alone worrying about hitting the building. Every pilot failed to impact the building every time. If they slow Des Plaines down to normal speeds flown at those altitudes of around 230 miles an hour the pilots were able to impact the building every time. The only pilot that hit one of the buildings barely was John layer on his ninth attempt all of this is recorded and well-documented. Although you have to look for it because Normal mainstream news fake news will not report these facts. I do believe people heard and saw planes that day but what they saw and what was actually there could have been two different things. Research a government program recently Declassified on the dod's website called Project Blue beam. This information exists and it's on a government website. It speaks of using holographic technology projected into the atmosphere. The technology has existed since the early 70s to produce a hologram in the atmosphere. Also the engine that was found near the 9/11 site was not even the type of engine that was used in those aircraft. It was a plant. Some other interesting research follows below Those towers were built with permits. When building a 1350ft tall build in a densely populated area certain things are considered. Airliner impact is and was one of those things. These buildings were specifically designed to withstand an impact from such an event. Not to say that considerable wouldn't have been incurred. But complete structural failure was defiantly out of the picture.
The 767 has a cruising speed of 533 mph and a top speed 567 in level flight at whatever flight level they tested. The terrorists descended into new york at full throttle meaning that they would also have picked up down ward momentum 23mph over the top speed is more than possible hell its fact cause it happened on 9/11/2001.
@@liljjbo17 you could also look up the flight path of both planes and see for yourself that the planes went in any type of dive or fast descent. Level flight.
@KrispyKrackers88 a 767 cannot fly a close to 600 mph at sea level. Physically impossible. Prove me wrong. I want you to research it and show me where I can see the documents that say in any condition that a 767 can fly that fast at that altitude fully loaded with fuel cargo and passengers.
@@liljjbo17 show me documents that prove a 767 can reach max speed at sea level. Those planes are designed to reach those speeds ONLY at 30000 feet. Not at sea level. It is physically impossible. Prove me wrong. Make the phone calls. Ask airline pilots. Fuck call boing for fuck sake. They will tell you them selfs it's not possible
This piece of debris was found in 2016. Until then no one knew it existed. It was thrown from the impact (along with other debris, and victims) and was wedged between two buildings a block or two away.
So it didn't take ANY fire damage at all? I mean.. thing looks pretty clean for being in a fire. No black soot, no char.. hell, hot enough to "melt steel beams" yet this thing retained a factory paint job throughout it all.. amazing work by the manufacturers.
Wrong, and wrong. The steel beams were weakened by the intense heat of a fire created by burning jet fuel, the specific slab construction of the buildings then led to their collapse. This item wasn't in the buildings for more than a second, as it was ejected from the impact and was found in 2016 wedged between two other buildings some distance away from the site. But please, continue to try to bend reality to suit your preferred delusions.
So that machinery just luckily squeezed between the columns? Appears to be in remarkable shape considering? Ignore the initial impact, drop a landing gear assembly from that height onto concrete. I doubt you'd have straight brackets as shown here.
Devoid32 - It weakened the steel, enough for it bend causing the entire upper floors to collapse onto the rest of the building. It never melted the steel. I'm not trying to lick the government's ass but Jesus people, it's not rocket science at all.
Jet engines aren't made of steel obviously. Mostly titanium and nickle alloy that has a much higher melting point. Also many parts of the engine that are affected by combustion are surrounded by and cooled by a boundary layer of air provided by the compressor section of the engine.
@@eddiexjunior except it actually melted steel. They found molten steel under all three buildings. Jet fuel doesn't do that. Thermite does. And for all you fucking boot lickers who think the government wouldn't/didn't do this, Google operation northwood. Our government doesn't give a shit about us.
because not all the plane ended up in the building. When the planes hit the planes shattered or disintegrate. This specific piece was sent flying away from the building
@@holdernewtshesrearin5471 ruclips.net/video/nu2QqxpYcvA/видео.html I don't think the plane went through the building at all. The plane as mentioned was meant to of been doing 500mph. Now if you take the time to watch the video in the link, you will see that the 3 to 4 inch steel girders that make up the structure of the WTC are far to strong to allow an aluminium plane which at best is 5cm thick pass through it. Anyhow, watch the film if you may.
hold 'er Newt, shes rearin' ? Alright, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I fully believe that planes hit the tower. But the plane WAS exposed to fire. It was the reason the fire started. They just wiped off the ashes and stuff before loading it into the truck.
They actually did search rooftops back in the weeks and months following the tragedy but didn't find much of anything that could be identified , most of what was found was bits of debris from the collapses themselves but nothing that was from the airplanes.
look carefully of the resolution of that video - it was originally recorded in HD - News stations have HD video but only put out grainly video . sometimes they leak HD file footage. See the news van in the background? i bought the same one from the NYC TV station that was in 9/11 it was FULL of HD equipment.
How come there is an old rope on it like it was lowered down with an old rope…. And the way that old rope is on the gear someone had to do it….. you can’t lower a rope down and loop it like that… Also you can see the new strap style rope they used to lift it out with…. It’s kinda suspiciously weird
The Dudest ok cool, but how TF did the engines and all that survive? And there's no way they were flying at 500 mph, in the video of the plane they're moving slower than that
@@earsofdumbo It might have been, because it's believed they found that passport in the pocket of a person who was also ejected from the building when the plane smashed through it, the man who was likely in the cockpit. Numerous other bodies were thrown from the building, as stated by witnesses on the ground who had to walk past them in the street. One of the most famous is RUclipsr Casey Neistat, who described leaving his apartment and going outside to see sheets being places over bodies and body parts. You see, all your "theories" have already been debunked and/or alternative and entirely logical explanations presented, you just choose to ignore reality because you're addicted to the idiocy of your "theories".
for fucks sake the steel did NOT melt. But guess what happens to metal when it's heated? It lengthens causing more pressure on it because it's now longer than other beams.
Ha Ha Ha If it's CNN approved it's total BS news. Lost interest in mass media the day after the Tonkin Bay incident. Even the whole Bin Ladin spiel is a joke. A direct relation to the House of Saud? Sure let's just shoot this tool. Idiots.
patently false statement. There are clear phones of plane part inside and outside the building esp the hardened survivable parts like engine cores and landing gear.
I keep hearing that jet liners can travel at 500mph at sea level never in a million years the air is way to thick the wings etc would fall off in no time only fighter jets can travel that speed at that altitude no way around it.
Obviously you know nothing about the design limitations of aircraft. While the limits were definitely being exceeded the possibility of inflight breakup was low.
You do know that the twin towers were designed to take an impact of a 707 should it be lost in the fog etc so with this in mind why did the towers collapse don't tell me jet fuel because its a hydrocarbon it doesn't burn anywhere near the 1000s of degrees as stated also the heat that is produced would dissipate through the rest of the undamaged steel frame like a heatsink so technically the steel would never get that hot do you have any idea how enormous those steel columns were some weighing 50ton a piece its like firing a alluminium beer can at a piece of steel crumple up to nothing maybe a slight exaggeration
im embarrassed that i was ever a conspiracy theorist. these people in the comments sound like absolute idiots. Cant even agree on a theory because they have no evidence to back up their claims.
The "logic" one truther uses to "prove" that the planes were holograms is the same "logic" another truther uses to "prove" that there really was a plane, but it was a military aircraft manned by CIA operatives. It's all ignorance-based conjecture. "Well, to my uneducated eye, it looked like . . ." is not evidence, nor is one's opinion on the US government. Real life isn't like the movies. The truth is not always as exciting as we'd like it to be. Welcome to the side of reason, my friend.
Or, they found it on one of the many body parts that were also ejected from the building when the plane hit it and you're just a dumbass who doesn't understand the difference between facts and delusion.
If anything from the plane would survive it's most likely to be the front nose section.Specially the south tower that went through the corner rather than in the middle.The jackers we're in the nose.Parts of them probably ended up on the street below, even a bandana and passport.The amount of paper that went undamaged that day should tell you the randomness and chaos of such forces.
@@ocjon1965 So it's just a coincidence that all the bystanders that just so happened to be recording when "planes" came out of nowhere (except Michael Hezarkhani) have degrees in CGI?
@@jayquinn9157 No, that is just your paranoia showing. The planes were seen by many people, all kinds of debris and plane contents was recovered. Only flat earthers still argue that everything is fake. Why did you decide to be one of them?
@@rinse-esnir4010 they also reported to Find the passports of the terrorists who took over and crashed the planes, in the building debris. How lucky is that? And then all of the same terrorists that were blamed were found still alive in their home countries right after the attacks.
A FOIA response from the NTSB dated 18 July 2008 regarding their records for identifying the aircraft involved reads, "Unfortunately the NTSB doesn't have any records". So no, not 100% at all.
Is this the kind of lame bullshit you "theorists" are resorting to now? Why not just stick with "Lizard People did it!" because it has the same level of stupid.
These 2 skyscrapers were not hit by planes. Both of the buildings were brought down by Nanothermite or a small nuclear bomb....What about building #7...
*These 2 skyscrapers were not hit by planes* Thousands of Manhattanites disagree with you. *Both of the buildings were brought down by Nanothermite or a small nuclear bomb* It's good that you keep your options open. I mean, if it's either/or I'm guessing you don't have evidence of either but a choice is nice! *What about building #7* I think leprechauns got that one.
I can't even begin to imagine the absolute heartbreak for the families that to this day still don't have formal identification for their loved ones as there's either nothing left from incineration or it's too small to even test. Still such a surreal thing 20 years on.
A lot of the remains ended up in the Hudson River during the collapses.
@@jennyfurr I wondered if anything fell into the Hudson like pieces of the buildings that they never recovered I don’t think I ever came across anything saying that they checked either
How many people were never found?
@@tommybrown9534 there's still over a thousand that haven't been identified yet as there's only literal fragments of bone left that don't have a DNA profile thag can be used to identify them with. It's tragic for those families that don't have closure.
@@tommybrown9534 About 1100-1200
gotta put that watermark on it! wouldn't want anyone else to get credit for history!
Lol
classic CNN
@Pizza Man someone would’ve crop the video out of the watermark and stole it lol
@Pizza Man who says they don't own it? They likely purchased it from somebody who owned it. Or there's no one else around to claim it.
the only people who have issues with watermarks...are potential thieves. If I shot this or paid for someone to shoot it. No one else is getting it for free.
You gotta love that VIDEO stamped in a beautiful WATERMARK >:(
Español por favore
rotary flap actuator and support structure from a 767, if you're wondering
just a prop if youre wondering
@@greensteinloud4982 if it was a prop they would have burned it more to make it more believable, or used something a little more recognizable as a plane part like a landing gear leg.
@@willj78are you guys okay? it literally says "PROP DEPT" on the tag. LMAO #publicIQcrisis!!!!!!!! also since you know their entire playbook then explain what happened to WTC6 & WTC7 which weren't impacted by any aluminum airliners. WTC7 somehow imploded. WTC somehow lost its entire core, rest intact! I mean no one is making this stuff up its all on video.
@@greensteinloud4982 "prop" is short for property...
I’ve been lead to believe that many of those parts did not belong to those planes. Also saw doc of airline pilot who said that commercial airlines could not perform those flight maneuvers that those planes did. They would have broken up mid flight on their descent toward the towers. Had to do with the physics of the downward air drafts of a plane going that fast at such low altitude. They had to be military craft in order to accomplish that.
You can see that piece of debris in many of the second plane strike videos. Clearly a huge piece of something is ejected blocks ahead of the crash out the other side of the building.
@@mrfourtwenty1183 denying newtons law? ool
LOL because no wing parts were ever found and the excuse given for no wing parts at the Pentagon was laughable because they said the wings folded up like a bird and went inside the Pentagon when in real life they would just shatter.
And the cutouts made for the right wing in the North Tower was not long enough so parts of the right wing should have been all over the ground.
@@ocjon1965 Thanks but I doubted a passenger jet hit the Pentagon from day one but it took a little longer to see how they made us think a jet flew in Nuke York City.
They also found a landing gear perfectly in-between two buildings 10 blocks from the wtc use to be.
@@RogerWittekind we all know the pentagon was hit by a missile ! All those cameras even at that time & we get a quick flash come on now ! They were made that the last flight got taken back over by the passengers all that killing & horror to start a war smh
To be carried out by the authorities even after all those years shows true means of respect to the victims. I'm surprised no treasure hunter or bozo found it and took it home with him. Incredible they found it wedged in between a couple of buildings 15 years later!
Totally true what you said, you nailed it, but even if an unscrupulous treasure hunter (or any other civilian) would of found it first, he or she would of still been totally compeled to inform the authorities, and of course could not have kept it nor much less try to auction or sell it, because not only would have that deporable scheme of trying to take it home and auctioning or selling it not had work, but also that person (or bozo) would have faced very serious federal criminal charges for it, any sane or rational person knows that. Only a special kind of idiot or bozo would of taken it home with him/her.
This is fking fake publicity for a holographic plane probably for all we know
Good luck trying to bring a thing that heavy home. I think it’s at least 300 kilos.
@@jimmynielsen2806 or even knowing what the hell it is or from
Up where I'm from in upstate New York near lake Huntington someone had beams from the south tower on their yard for like 3 years after the attacks. I still remember when homeland security showed up to take them
Imagine being one of those idiots who think planes never hit the buildings lmao. They exist
Drones
15 years later most of those idiots voted for the worst president in U.S. history, DONALD J. TRUMP SR.
😂
It was not accidentally……didnt you know ????????????????????????
There are no people who deny planes (the specifics about the ‘planes’ is a different story) hitting the WTC, which is what this video is. However, there are people who have a strong suspicion (for all the good reasons) that the pentagon was not hit by a plane, but by a possible missile or something of the likes.
Please do a bit of critical research. The truth never has any contradictions, lies and is never shy from sharing information and bringing closure to the victims’ families, America and the world.
Everything disappeared except part of this plane. What about the israle E-team art students?
They are Austrian and they are still around
After reading some of these comments the conclusion is, You couldn't whack sense into the brain-dead conspiracy theorists even with a hammer.
JoMac - brain? "truthers" have no brain to whack.
JoMac well I expect a idiotic comment like that from a moron ! Tell me why a massive structure reinforced with massive steal housing the offices top to bottom .... How did a plane hitting the top sections release such massive amount of jet fuel causing wide spread fire straight up ..... How did that steal become weak enough to drop a tower from the bottom up ? Think those mini nukes seem exploding right as tower dropped help at all ? Yep days before they had workers on both towers ... That building was.built to take massive amounts of damages ...... Then tell me terrorist walked.on planes caring massive weapons, no red flags ..... Bullshit ! A plane did not hit the Pentagon, not one wing was found ! But sure found them at ground zero though . Stop being stupid go learn something! Btw , 3 trillion and a court date ring a bell ????
sit n spin for the win HOOOOLY SHIT I FORGOT HOW CLOSE-MINDED AND STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORISTS WERE LMAOOO
Or even withone of their hologram boeing 767s
Portanto,Bush e companhia são os gajos bons,os politicos são todos uns tipos acusados injustamente,e devemos acreditar neles.Realmente aqui está mais uma prova credível em como aqueles atentados rituais ,foram mesmo praticados por terroristas de turbante e que beberam whisky americano antes de partirem para o martírio.Não foi inside jude job,as pessoas é que são umas parvinhas que vêm merda em tudo o que é sitio.Porra,já posso ir dormir descansado.
Bloody hell...Eerie,disgusting,heartwrenching.
Blame the C👁🗨A! Innocent people lost their lives for greed & war....
@@Coco-xw3wpblame islam
@@westaussie965blame the west who colonized and destroyed Muslim countries don’t colonize if u don’t wanna see resistance 😂
Good gravy, both of you belong to the same branch of monotheistic religion. Along with judaism. The same one that targeted, murdered, and tried to erase paganism thousands of years older than jesus’s first fart. You both took from the people you tried to erase; like your days of the week, wedding ceremony tying the knot,binding of hands only thing you both added was women can’t divorce and/or be stoned- since we are literally ‘blaming the child for the sins of the father’. So you all are terrible. And seemingly blinded by malice to learn your own history religious or otherwise you’ve made hatred your culture. P.s jesus was a jew, born in the middle east, and his image that is currently on the walls of churches being worshipped in u.s was modeled by an Italian, incestuous, murderous, ego driven son of the pope during the Italian renaissance- aka- an earlier hitler who wanted to be a god, and I guess got his wish. jesus was a sun scarred carpenter born from a minor girl. Definitely not a white, blue eyed, greek nosed chad. And I’m just bitching about western majority, not including the others.
That lady at 0:05 pretending to help, but she really just wanted to touch it.
YEA I NOTICED THAT - DONT WORRY SHES STILL GETTING PAID TO PRETEND.
DONT WORRY! SHE WANTED TO TOUCH THE LOVELY SMELL OF AIRCRAFT DEBRIS SMMMMMMMMMMMMM
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
She was pulling strap out of way
She was helping, she pulled the strap off, you can visibly see it
its crazy how tv shows and movies foreshadowed this.
93 happened and somehow Hollywood didn’t think much of that attack.......
It's really not. All it took was imagination, and they had that imagination when they were building these towers and considered the ramifications of the largest passenger plane at that time hitting one of those buildings.
Conspiracy nuts want to pretend that there's something strange about that when there absolutely isn't. It's basic planning and consideration for plausible scenarios.
what shows foreshadowed this?
its crazy how tv show and movies have plane parts as props
Thousands of eye witnesses in NYC on 9/11/2001. Go to NYC and ask around.
@Brother Dude how do you put a hologram in the air?
@@ygsr How does a plane break newtons law?
More like millions, people from 20-30 miles could see the buildings up in smoke. Some people just aren't that bright.smh.
like you. @@hueso5071
Didn't look very melted & mangled to me
That’s because it flew away.
Because you're ignorant about physics. The debris doesn't have to melt to satisfy your conspiracy theories. Plenty of metals are durable at even high temperatures
Conspiracists: That wasn’t a plane that hit those buildings
Me: Then wtf do you call that???
Hillary Clinton's 🧹
Even with video and photo footage of the plane with the UA livery clearly show , the conspiracists still don’t believe it was a plane!
@@d22ghj1 It was Witch Hillary's broomstick.
@@ArcanumAscent No, I know an airplane when I see one. I have eyes, and am able to use them.
What is it? You certainly don't know.
Such a sad sad day in America 😢
This comment section didn’t disappoint lmao 🍿🥤
Literally every video- even remotely linked to 9/11- has these comments. People really are willing to die on stupid hills. I don't know whether to laugh or cry, tbh.
I know, right
Dr judy woods
The earth is flat too, don’t forget our other meeting later tonight.
The earth isn't flat. Tgere is literally no logical reason why they would lie to us about the earth being a sphere or elliptical
James Presser The chance of the earth being flat is as close to zero as a rational person could claim, without being literally zero.
James Presser oh lol
I’ll bring the matches!
I want to see a plane debris removal from the Pentagon.
Haha. Me too. There is none! If there was a plane crash. Half of the pentagon would be gone.
@@miketurin5233 There is no wing damage. NO video of a plane allegedly hitting one of the most secure places in the U.S.?
Why would anyone bother when you'd just move the goalposts and claim it was put there by "Illuminati Lizard People" anyway?
There was. Saudi lovers.
@@hidingposer3422 Why would there be a camera placed facing a random side of the building. I bet that the inside is littered with cameras on the other hand.
Alot of these comments I see make no sense about how all the plane peice's did not melt from the explosion. You do know so many parts did not stay in side the building they hit right? That peice's of the planes will break off soon as cockpit hit, peice's would have been inside building. And peice's shot out other side. I mean it's pretty simple how it works.
Then why when we watch the countless videos of the plane impact several in high definition in slow motion UC appsolutely 0 parts of the plane coming off anywhere outside of the building either on the impact side or the other side you can see for yourself
Simple how that works huh
@@1billyknorr Video can control the Minds.
@@1billyknorr Are you serious? Big time parts are seen coming out of the other side, plane # 2... You, my nonfriend ...are deranged.
Reality doesn't suit their narrative, so they just edit out the inconvenient bits to make it easier for their moron friends to believe.
"Airplane Debris, WTC 9/11" exhaustively lists the plane parts found in NYC... in 80+ free pages.
No it doesn't
awc222 lol. I love this.
@@awc222 proof?
ruclips.net/video/xRCDUlo798k/видео.html
m.ruclips.net/video/HwSljX4_e7M/видео.html
Watch the videos, and tell me how the hell the nose of the plane is coming out the other side of the building intact?
Release the CCTV footage of the Passengers and Hijackers boarding those planes
And the official passenger lists which, oh by the way is a - legal - document. They have never released the full official lists.
Aluminum planes wrecked by a hail storm or brought down by a bird strike can fly through reinforced steel? I don't think so.
@OneUp thank you for educating this person👍
It has taken 10 years to remove the pieces wow.
No damage or charring.
Because it wasn't in the building for more than a second, it was ejected during the crash. You'd know this if you bothered to do any checking instead of just believing your conspiracy nut friends.
only a rope.
yeah right.@@ct5625
My right ear loved this
GW BUSH BEING COVERED IN END--------
RIP ASSHOLE
it wasn't just me
this has got to be the most insane comment section i have ever seen
Keep going because you forgot to say why.
@@RogerWittekind well if you can take one look at it i’m sure you can find out
@@hughg.rection7380 Well I am surprised to see anybody thinks those jets were real.
@@RogerWittekind tell me why you think that
@@hughg.rection7380 Interesting not only has RUclips deleted videos that spilled the beans I can't even post about them.
I'll try again later.
Thanks for the CNN Collection stamp.
So the plane is vaporised but that part of the plane turns up unscathed 🤔
james hallas it wasn’t vaporized, who said it was
tadpoleguy I’ve been watching a lot of 911 stuff and it’s just what I’ve watched or read about mate I’m from uk
james hallas oh no hurt feelings, don’t feed into the conspiracists, they are a buncha cunts, anywho I’ll try to find more videos with plane parts, I watched one earlier and I’ll look for it
Sheeple NEED to believe without evidence, facts or detail. No debris at any point of impact on 9/11
@@jonathanstuart7354 You willfind no debris at any point of impact. ZERO>
Oh!!! my second favorite comments was about seeing half naked people around the area where the plane hit tower one. The person couldn't understand why they were half naked. Ya know, I have an idea. I bet it was flipping hot as Hell up there. It was hot enough to cause people to jump 100 stories to their death so I really bet that they were hot. You really should find something else to nit pick. Leave this alone!!!
didnt see that U are nuts
@Kristie C my heart hurts for the people inside. They were probably choking with the smoke, and I bet it was horrible if it made them jump to their death. Apparently it was 800 degrees Celsius inside.
Bruh you have no respect for those who lost their lives during those attacks you idiot
Amy White, they were taking there clothes off on purpose, go read Dr Judy Woods book " Where did the towers go" everyone wants to speculate and donot do any research. Leave it up to the EXPERTS is what I say. Also go watch " Alchemy 911" documentary
@@donaldheinlein1545 Stop reading these fucking books and think for yourself.
It was a plane wing that was discovered decades later ✈️
Conspiracy theorists rn are like “how could an aluminum plane cut through solid steel with no problem” while also being like “theres no way any part of the plane could have gotten knocked off the plane on impact, sounds fishy” like wtf make up your mind on what you want to argue
the planes totally went inside the footprint of the building, so for anything to come out, it would have to go all the way through the center of the building and shoot out the other side, so thats probably where people are casting doubts... even though they would have been going stupid fast.. fyi there is an interview with the towers designers and they said it was built to withstand a plane crash...
The plane is almost the entire width of the building. The central part where the lifts and stairwells were was hit by the nose/fuselage/body of the plane. The wings, which this is part of, avoided the central core. The buildings weren't built to withstand 757s loaded with jet fuel flying as fast as they were. Fucking passengers came out of the building, they found them on the rooftops, and they're not quite as robust as planes when it comes to hitting concrete and steel.
@@orbtastic ohh yeah so it didn’t used fuel from boston to new york all the amount of fuel as it was on the floor also has it before it hit the tower 🤣🤣🤣
@@orbtastic explain to me 1 thing if it was loaded why the north tower still remain firm while the south collapsed. The north tower remain firm on fire for an hour and 42 min and the south tower was gone and it was the last one that got hit by the plane . The plane hit the south tower 17 min after the north tower was hit and burning but still in shape and the south tower within an hour collapsed
@@luispeguero3266 Yes the planes used fuel to get to NY from the airports, are you seriously trying to say that they didn't hit the buildings with jet fuel on board?
Like, are you fucking kidding me, theorists? It’s RIGHT THERE!!!
were you there on that day or its just hearsay?
As a aviation expert that looks like a landing gear from one of the planes
I’m a little surprised by this, I had a feeling that the planes completely disintegrated once they hit the towers.
A lot of the lightweight parts of it did. The heavy solid steel pieces... no.
Some bits went cannoning off blocks away. Same with the bodies on the plane, they found pieces of them on roof tops of other buildings years later. One woman on the street was hit with the landing gear/wheels from the first plane and practically lost half her body. The debris was scattered all over, way before the buildings came down.
It's not surprising at all. Numerous pieces of at least one of the planes was ejected from the building on impact. There's a very famous series of photos displaying one of the engines from flight 175 laying in Murray Street, further away from where this piece of landing gear from that same plane was found wedged between two buildings. Other photos show tires from the landing gear and other heavy parts of the plane. Casey Neistat has shared his experience from that day. He was staying in an apartment a block away from the towers and when it happened he walked out into the street and there was debris and body parts all over the place, with an EMT using blankets to cover them up. This was while Fire crews were still arriving at the towers and before the second plane hit.
So, we know, for a fact, and confirmed by witnesses, that not only did plane debris fly from that building, but body parts did, also. This is why the people who claim a terrorist's passport can't have survived the crash are moronic. They want to claim that it's too "miraculous" that a lone passport was found when we know bodies were thrown, and we know that terrorist was on the plane. It's entirely plausible that they found that one passport in a pocket on one of those bodies thrown from the plane, because they would have been gathering all of that evidence immediately.
@@ct5625 damn dude. I had never even thought about that before. I think it was Atta's passport they found on the street. But picturing that he put his passport in his breast pocket, and him being in the very front of the plane as he's flying it, that's one of the first things (along with probably a chunk of torso) that's getting shot out the building at relatively the same speed the plane was traveling due to inertia. To be honest I've wondered about that, but what you said definitely makes sense. Thanks!
@@orbtastic you're statement is true
You know it's bull when Wikipedia tells you what happened. Every time.
Shouldn't it be blackened from the extreme heat of the jet fuel . . .
Never underestimate the power of cognitive dissonance.
And dis info bums
The powerful thing as well is the lack of response to your words. I agree with you..you know Its a weird sensation to have so many people seriously deny reality because they personally were not in NYC to see it in person. Those are the people that are most certain of everything. I somehow saw it happen and still feel less certain and more anxious about the world now.
Bush did 9/11
@@bobsaget338 Nah you did it
+@@bobsaget338 How did he do it? Ummmm! That soiled Saudi underwear tastes so good. Huh!
Better hide those parts. Part numbers and serial numbers might reveal the truth. Can't have that. Notice no parts at pentagon or Shanksville.
There were tons of parts at both locations
@@c5mjohn nope. Where?
John Campbell there are parts held at the 9/11 museum you fucking wallnut
@@c5mjohn Meep Dude really look at the photos they tell the evidence. Not one body not one piece of luggage no engines no airline seats were found at the site where the plane crashed into the ground. Also soil samples taken revealed no fuel in the ground........fact check with eyes cover your ears. Dont listen to what your told. Review the photos and use deductive reasoning. Research other plane crashes look at the debris that's left behind and compared to the debris that was found crash site
@@quadraticcucumber3137 Wow. You are easily triggered little buttercup. Need your blankey?
The worst thing that was peddled. That jet planes can do 500 mph at ground level, as they claimed. So why do we even fly at 40 000 feet when we can do it at a low altitude. I can’t believe people think this is real
Yea, sorry but that ain't from a plane hitting the towers.
Nite Flite elaborate
explain
@@thephelpster1881 According to newtons law, this thing shouldn't even exist after the impact
It in Remarkable good shape after its gone through all that steel and concrete fell down that crack without even marking the sides the rope around the peace of landing gear you can see one side of the rope clearly on the right hand side on the left there is a white smudgy line to the left of that very faintly is the other side of the rope you can see the pattern in the rope
Philip Mccullagh - oh, youve OBVIOUSLY exposed a CONSPIRACY!
You should run down to Washington with your evidence and bring those responsible to justice.
lmao
Planes hit the towers
Shhhhh.
I noticed too
Snk collection - oh you noticed the rope around the aircraft part that OBVIOUSLY was used to LOWER the part down between the buildings in a sneaky government attempt to plant evidence that aircraft really did destroy the WTC Towers and definetely was NOT wrapped around it to RECOVER it and secure the heavy component to the hand truck that they used to move it to the pickup truck.
BRILLIANT! Just brilliant........lmao!
@@holdernewtshesrearin5471 Judy woods explained wtc in great detail. They use directed or free energy to blow the building. Debris of 110 floor building was just left with a pile. All the building was atomised and turns into dust.
Did they forget to take the prop tag off when they picked it up??
James Dobson underrated comment right here
@@rushiljohal yes my friend many people died that's why people need to look closely at the evidence and find those responsible. Do I know exactly what happened? No, but I DO know what couldn't have happened. Good luck.
The international footage that went to Iraq and Afghanistan that day had no planes in it.
Dr Judy wood wrote a book called “where did the towers go?” Answers to entire 40+ year conspiracy are pretty much summed up by “9/11: Alchemy” by wolf clan media
Hello I’m new to the comment section I thought that this might help to what The tag means, (property clerk division), which I also means that they safe guard any evidence that would be recovered
N.Y.C.P.D. PROP. CLK. DIV. 1246550 is what the tag says to those who are confusing PROP. of being a actual prop
GEORGE BUSH RIP .47
Theorists aren't playing with a full deck. They simultaneously believe an ultra powerful cabal of super genius super villains managed to secretly pull off one of the biggest crimes in human history, and also forgot to take a "prop" label off of an unnecessarily planted piece of evidence fifteen years after the crime lol
@@waspanimations7037 I know that, my old message is to those who use the word as something fake or a piece from a set. Sorry for extremely late reply.
Strange it seems to be in such good shape when supposedly the fires were hot enough to cause the buildings to collapse. Where is the fire damage?
Everywhere! There’s fire damage in a lot of places
This piece was ejected from the building on impact, so it's just shredded, it didn't have time to burn it just fell to the street.
It flew when the plane crashed, I really cant believe ppl cant use their brain and logic..
What is wrong with you people??? Ahhhgggggggg
Hey dumbass it went through the building
Looks like a piece of the landing gear
Correctamundo
It is. It was jettisoned from the building when the plane impacted it, as was at least one engine and potentially several bodies (which is believed to be why they managed to find a passport of one of the terrorists, in his pocket, on what was left of his body after being thrown from the other side of the building).
Guess what millennials we also went to the moon 6 times....
I fucking hate it when retards try to deny we went to the moon. Way to piss on the lifetime achievements of thousands of better men not to mention the three astronauts killed in Apollo 1.
Wankers
@@visionist7 I absolutely care about those killed in any event. However, too many coincidences happened in 9/11 for the official report to be what really happened. As for the moon landings, have you ever watched interviews with those old men who claimed to go to the moon? They can't handle the simple questions without getting angry. Van Allen belts would be enough to toast them all based on the evidence we have present day. It really is not much different that 9/11. A president who wanted or was forced to invent something in a race to beat their enemy to it. Or in the case of 9/11 as a way to get support for an unnecessary war that is still going on almost 2 decades later. I feel for those who lost their lives and their families but this government is as corrupt as it gets and it has been going on for a Century or so if not longer.
Guess what brain washed Boomer no the fuck we didnt.
@Nick Payne another flat earther
@Nick Payne wanna talk about self esteem post a picture of yourself
I have a hard time understanding how anyone could think that any part of this horrible horrible day was fake. If planes didn't hit the buildings then where did the planes go? I doubt they just disappeared. Plus some of the passengers were either talking to 911, airlines or family especially on the later two flights, they knew the score and I believe they knew their fate. Many inoscent people lost their lives or their loved one. It's disrespectful to try to say it didn't happen. Any of it!!! Oh and my favorite question I have found in these wonderful comments... Where did all the buildings and people go? Actually what they said was something like, if each floor is a certain height, then where is the rest of the buildings and people after the collapse or something like that. Well how's this.. You remember all the dust flying everywhere after the collapse. There's your building and your victims. Dust, pieces of flesh, paper, desks etc.. It was all mixed together. I saw interviews of first responders who said they could see flesh everywhere in the dust. But reguardless, I've read some horrible comments but just so you know 911 did happen just like they said. The only thing they were guilty of was not capturing those freaks earlier and preventing this from happening. May God bless everyone affected by this tragedy.
Remind me....where's the video of the 757 hitting the Pentagon? I'm waiting......wouldn't that remove ALL doubt? I'm still waiting........
That's right !! All of the people on those flights/planes did not fake their own deaths.....People saying this was a controlled demolition, government inside job, CGI, no planes, ect,..is way beyond ridiculous !
@@stricknine8623 You're either freaking blind or on the government payroll.
jOE Marchand
"Blind" ?
Provide irrefutable evidence that the passengers faked their own deaths.
Provide irrefutable, hard evidence to me that those United Airlines jetliners are not missing from their fleet, stolen, turned over willfully or whatever your wildest stretch to SPECULATION may be...If you believe it was a controlled demolition, the burden is yours to provide a logical explanation as to HOW an undertaking as large and elaborate as such could be accomplished in two structures of 50,000 workers and an average of 200,000 visitors per day without anyone noticing.
Blind ? You say,....No, your imaginations and speculations are entirely your own and do not belong to me or the truth that which is only supported by facts that can be substantiated...
Calling me blind is no legitimate argument and a foolish one at that.
@Brother Dude
1. The towers collapsed from the impact zones, not below.
2. They didn't fall at free fall.
3. Explosions? In a burning building? No shit, where you been? Notice that the firefighters didn't seem to find it odd...
4. Why would you expect a building to tip to the side? Gravity pulls downward.
5. The floors collapsed. Do you expect the floors to get up and jump out the window? Really?
6. After the floors collapsed you can see the columns standing several hundred feet for up to 30 seconds before they toppled over. Clearly not damaged at the bottom. I think you need a construction job...
Conspiracy theorists; if there were bombs in these buildings (both towers) don’t you think one of them if not more would’ve prematurely detonated prior to the plane crashes?
Good story
There are a lot of explosives which require other sources of energy to detonate. Also: If there were explosives it can be safely assumed that it was planned. Which implies they also knew about the plane impact zone and so could've moved the explosives into the non impact zone beforehand.
Ask Trump he knows bombs were used: ruclips.net/video/Us9rq9zXFxs/видео.html
hahaha that's a very stupid question mr brains
Detonations were heard by firefighters and witnesses. The testimonials were ignored by the 911 commission.
this is a bunch of horsecrap
2 airliners, 3 skyscrapers. I guess my math is off.
No you’re fucking brain is off
It's not your math that's off. It's your understanding of physics and engineering.
Let me get this right, nothing in the entire building survived, not even the steel beams, but we're to believe this huge chuck of airplane did?
Steel beams did survive, I guess you haven't actually done any research at all because several of them are on display in numerous locations.
Steel is WEAKENED by highly combustible jet fuel (shock!) and a building of that design cannot take the weight of 20 floors from above collapsing onto a lower floor, which caused the pancake effect as each floor collapsed under the growing weight falling from above. This is all explained by physics, you should look into that.
Besides all the other educating I've delivered, you should know this piece of the plane was thrown several blocks from the impact (along with other plane parts photographed on the day and witnessed by people in the street who were almost killed by them) and numerous body parts of victims (again witnessed by numerous people).
You guys love to scream "do your own research" when it seems none of you are capable of reading.
@@ct5625 yeah, that is it, I haven't done any research at all. You're also an idiot. I would dare you to try to burn steel of any kind with diesel fuel. please check back here and let me know how that goes.
Before you talk to me about how a building would handle 20 floors on top collapsing, we need to explain how a jet flying into the building didn't have a single piece bounce off into the street, how the steel somehow melted perfect evenly in order to fall straight down, how a second building did the exact same thing and then later how a 3rd building that wasn't touched by the other two fell in exactly the same way the same day.
I am not a conspiracy nut and I do research before I say stupid shit. Maybe this is a stupid idea, but when there are more than 50 glaring questions that have never been answered you have to at least question what you know. Add to all of this that we're watching our very government attempt these types of things in front of our faces today, it doesn't take a leap to see what they've done in the past.
You probably also believe Jan 6 was an attack on our Capital by extremists. You'd be right there but it was the FBI that did the attack and there is so much proof out there you'd be a total fool to not see it.
Asks for an explanation for how a jet flying into the building didnt have a single piece exit the building. Posts it on a video showing a piece of the jet that had exited the building when the jet impacted.
@@mikero6225 People have analyzed that video clip and that engine didn't come from the jets that crashed. It also doesn't appear to have crashed through a building and fallen 80 stories to the street. There are so many things wrong with the entire story of 911 that it makes your head explode. Sorta like anyone believing the 2020 elections were not rigged.
this is 5 years old - did they ever release any findings?
Findings? Finding this UA175 piece was THE finding. A plane hit WTC2 and some of its fragments flew out toward north, landing on streets and in between buildings. What findings were you expecting to see? That a UFO hit the building?
What about the rope?
You see that yellow tarp is part of the coverup
Ayyyyyyyyyyy
Lmao
Well you can go and tell that to the families fuckhead
Annette Melnychuk woooosh
@@user-jj7uc9gg7b can you stop acting like a child so fuck you
In great shape after hitting steel at 500mph
Right
Maybe made from the same material as the passport.
This type of engine did not match one of the planes.
Somebody dumped it an hour earlier so the police could find it. It came from a plane cemetary. Old news.
You're a douche like the rest of the conspiracy "theorists ". It's a dense, compact FRAGMENT of a fucking hundred+ ton plane ✈️🙄
@@gmailaccount1894 you really need to get out more
And I bet it was quickly whisked away to be sent for scrap recycling instead of being analysed from a crime scene. Just like the tons of steel at Ground Zero...
Yea, right police handling plane wreckage... nothing fishy to see here.😂😅
Since this part of the plane survived, where's the black boxes?
This is the comment I was looking for. The black boxes are what we want to know about.
An engine was found on murray street which doest belong to either of the 2 planes.
Really? At 300mph it looks that good? Come on man…
What do you mean by "that good"? How is it supposed to look?
More like 600 mph, and yes it got ejected out the other side..
@@laurentianvmx1692 500 mph
Imagine seeing the cockpit with the hijacker’s and their bodies ripped into pieces with blood everywhere. Would be very hard for the people having to deal with the cleanup
So per Boeing website a 767 has a max air speed of 433 mph. Video evidence show what is perceived to be a plane impacting tower 2 at 590 mph and only one video of the 1st impact hitting tower one at 465mph. Well above the airframes safety limits. The engines are designed to produce a certain amount of thrust at cruising altitude. Where the atmosphere is far less dense. At the altitude the planes impacted if we take the slower of the two planes the engines would have to have
a minimum of 3 times the amount of thrust to be able to move the plane at that speed. This is fact you can do the math yourself. Not to mention the air intake would also have to be much larger to take in that much more air. Again air density.... Now John Lear. Son of the inventor of the Lear Jet ran a multitude of flight simulations with the Boeing 767. He took 9 Pilots three experienced with a 767-3 experienced with other large aircraft and three fresh out of Flight School. He said the flight simulator up for New York City set the air speed and plenty of distance from the towers to follow the same flight path that was recorded by radar that day. Each pilot was given nine tries to hit the building. Half the time the plane disintegrated midair due to the forces traveling that fast that that attitude with that then severe the other half of the time the plane was so all over the place it is damn near uncontrollable the pilots were fighting to keep the plane from crashing into the ground let alone worrying about hitting the building. Every pilot failed to impact the building every time. If they slow Des Plaines down to normal speeds flown at those altitudes of around 230 miles an hour the pilots were able to impact the building every time. The only pilot that hit one of the buildings barely was John layer on his ninth attempt all of this is recorded and well-documented. Although you have to look for it because Normal mainstream news fake news will not report these facts. I do believe people heard and saw planes that day but what they saw and what was actually there could have been two different things. Research a government program recently Declassified on the dod's website called Project Blue beam. This information exists and it's on a government website. It speaks of using holographic technology projected into the atmosphere. The technology has existed since the early 70s to produce a hologram in the atmosphere. Also the engine that was found near the 9/11 site was not even the type of engine that was used in those aircraft. It was a plant. Some other interesting research follows below
Those towers were built with permits. When building a 1350ft tall build in a densely populated area certain things are considered. Airliner impact is and was one of those things. These buildings were specifically designed to withstand an impact from such an event. Not to say that considerable wouldn't have been incurred. But complete structural failure was defiantly out of the picture.
The 767 has a cruising speed of 533 mph and a top speed 567 in level flight at whatever flight level they tested. The terrorists descended into new york at full throttle meaning that they would also have picked up down ward momentum 23mph over the top speed is more than possible hell its fact cause it happened on 9/11/2001.
@@liljjbo17 ruclips.net/video/c35uS4o2GkI/видео.html
Watch this interview with John Lear .Irrefutable no, planes brother
@@liljjbo17 you could also look up the flight path of both planes and see for yourself that the planes went in any type of dive or fast descent. Level flight.
@KrispyKrackers88 a 767 cannot fly a close to 600 mph at sea level. Physically impossible. Prove me wrong. I want you to research it and show me where I can see the documents that say in any condition that a 767 can fly that fast at that altitude fully loaded with fuel cargo and passengers.
@@liljjbo17 show me documents that prove a 767 can reach max speed at sea level. Those planes are designed to reach those speeds ONLY at 30000 feet. Not at sea level. It is physically impossible. Prove me wrong. Make the phone calls. Ask airline pilots. Fuck call boing for fuck sake. They will tell you them selfs it's not possible
Was this found five years ago when the video was posted or was this video taken from back when the attacks happened?
It was taken days after pretty sure. You can the building next to them with all windows shattered.
The quality of this video seems to good to be from 2001
This piece of debris was found in 2016. Until then no one knew it existed. It was thrown from the impact (along with other debris, and victims) and was wedged between two buildings a block or two away.
So it didn't take ANY fire damage at all? I mean.. thing looks pretty clean for being in a fire. No black soot, no char.. hell, hot enough to "melt steel beams" yet this thing retained a factory paint job throughout it all.. amazing work by the manufacturers.
Why do you assume that the building the landing gear crashed into was on fire?
The buildings collapsed due to fire supposedly melting the steel, yet this landing gear never even got warm, right.
@@jeffreykamke Why would a landing gear, that was never even close to the burning tower, be affected the heat of the fires
The same way your finger doesn't get burn marks when you quickly pass it through a small flame; it wasn't in the fire for long enough.
Lmao its just parts from Lionsgate
İt looks so 'undamaged'. Fuel melted the steel of buildings but this, it seems.
The fuel didn't melt anything, and this thing was ejected on impact. Do any of you people think or are you just natural window lickers?
Wrong, and wrong.
The steel beams were weakened by the intense heat of a fire created by burning jet fuel, the specific slab construction of the buildings then led to their collapse.
This item wasn't in the buildings for more than a second, as it was ejected from the impact and was found in 2016 wedged between two other buildings some distance away from the site.
But please, continue to try to bend reality to suit your preferred delusions.
Wasn't that official statement? You are delusional, with just one post how can i bend reality,are u ok?
And my post was mostly ironic. İt's dissappointing how you understand.
What happened to those Ti engine shafts?
Nothing just some parts from the warehouse
They found the plane part but not 90%of the bodies???!!!
Trump said he stopped a 3rd plane from hitting the towers all by himself. He's so amazing. darrrrr.
So that machinery just luckily squeezed between the columns? Appears to be in remarkable shape considering? Ignore the initial impact, drop a landing gear assembly from that height onto concrete. I doubt you'd have straight brackets as shown here.
So apparently the fuel engine can melt steal beams but not the engine?
Devoid32 - It weakened the steel, enough for it bend causing the entire upper floors to collapse onto the rest of the building. It never melted the steel. I'm not trying to lick the government's ass but Jesus people, it's not rocket science at all.
Jet engines aren't made of steel obviously. Mostly titanium and nickle alloy that has a much higher melting point. Also many parts of the engine that are affected by combustion are surrounded by and cooled by a boundary layer of air provided by the compressor section of the engine.
This is the landing gear not the engine
@@eddiexjunior except it actually melted steel. They found molten steel under all three buildings. Jet fuel doesn't do that. Thermite does. And for all you fucking boot lickers who think the government wouldn't/didn't do this, Google operation northwood. Our government doesn't give a shit about us.
because not all the plane ended up in the building. When the planes hit the planes shattered or disintegrate. This specific piece was sent flying away from the building
First of all what part of the plane is it? And why is nypd removing it and not the NTSB🤔
Why isn’t it black from the intense fire 🧐🧐🧐
They wiped it off before they put it in the back of the truck! Lol
Sweet Dreamer :p - maybe because it was going 600 mph and passed through the building and wasnt exposed to the fire.
ya thunk?
idiots....
@@holdernewtshesrearin5471
ruclips.net/video/nu2QqxpYcvA/видео.html
I don't think the plane went through the building at all. The plane as mentioned was meant to of been doing 500mph. Now if you take the time to watch the video in the link, you will see that the 3 to 4 inch steel girders that make up the structure of the WTC are far to strong to allow an aluminium plane which at best is 5cm thick pass through it. Anyhow, watch the film if you may.
@@kev.6149 Then explain the countless amount of evidence that planes hit the building, moron.
hold 'er Newt, shes rearin' ? Alright, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I fully believe that planes hit the tower. But the plane WAS exposed to fire. It was the reason the fire started. They just wiped off the ashes and stuff before loading it into the truck.
They should continue to go atop of many building roofing to find more pieces
They actually did search rooftops back in the weeks and months following the tragedy but didn't find much of anything that could be identified , most of what was found was bits of debris from the collapses themselves but nothing that was from the airplanes.
look carefully of the resolution of that video - it was originally recorded in HD - News stations have HD video but only put out grainly video . sometimes they leak HD file footage. See the news van in the background? i bought the same one from the NYC TV station that was in 9/11 it was FULL of HD equipment.
How come there is an old rope on it like it was lowered down with an old rope…. And the way that old rope is on the gear someone had to do it….. you can’t lower a rope down and loop it like that…
Also you can see the new strap style rope they used to lift it out with…. It’s kinda suspiciously weird
And where are the plane's black box's? Incinerated?
Crushed with the force of the RMS Titanic hitting a tower frame at 500 mph
The Dudest ok cool, but how TF did the engines and all that survive? And there's no way they were flying at 500 mph, in the video of the plane they're moving slower than that
@@rig0rmort1s It may look slow but they were going at least 400kmh to have the engines and landing gear blasted out the other side
The Dudest ive heard tell that the plane they claim this belonged to can only go 300mph
@@rig0rmort1s Nah man 767s have a CRUISING speed of 520mph
Sad times
What a bunch of crap!!!!
Must of been made from a different steel to the frame of the world trade centre as that steel didn't melt!
It was ejected out the side of the building so it didn’t burn but fell to the ground.
@@danield679 do you know of it was found anywhere near the hijackers plastic covered paper passport that also survived the explosion?
@@earsofdumbo It might have been, because it's believed they found that passport in the pocket of a person who was also ejected from the building when the plane smashed through it, the man who was likely in the cockpit. Numerous other bodies were thrown from the building, as stated by witnesses on the ground who had to walk past them in the street. One of the most famous is RUclipsr Casey Neistat, who described leaving his apartment and going outside to see sheets being places over bodies and body parts.
You see, all your "theories" have already been debunked and/or alternative and entirely logical explanations presented, you just choose to ignore reality because you're addicted to the idiocy of your "theories".
for fucks sake the steel did NOT melt. But guess what happens to metal when it's heated? It lengthens causing more pressure on it because it's now longer than other beams.
lol everyone is so smart here lol
uses lol twice in the same sentence
@@JoshuaVuitton using 1 yourself
Where in the world was that hiding?
deep in the debris
Where did Dey find dat ding, Jimmy’s scrap yard???
planting that was just as easy as planting flowers. looks like a scrap yard piece 2 me 2 or it was a gear part of the elevators.
No they found it stuck between two buildings, couple years back they found some landing gear too
“Where did they find that thing” are you mentally challenged?
your watermark is not too obnoxious, CNN.
Ha Ha Ha If it's CNN approved it's total BS news. Lost interest in mass media the day after the Tonkin Bay incident. Even the whole Bin Ladin spiel is a joke. A direct relation to the House of Saud? Sure let's just shoot this tool. Idiots.
What salvage yard did they get that from?
No plane debris at the Pentagon. Go figure!
They dove in at such an insane speed it pretty much disintegrated on impact and some Debris was found around the site what a moron
There’s images of the American Airlines running stripes from the 757 fuselage at the pentagon site
@@jackphibbs8749 his brain doesn’t function very well might be special or something
patently false statement. There are clear phones of plane part inside and outside the building esp the hardened survivable parts like engine cores and landing gear.
Fake plane parts
After they put it there
Nope
Interesting how the whole building disintegrated but a part of the plane fell fully intact and undamaged with all the cogs still fine.
Is this in the memorial museum now?
No
I keep hearing that jet liners can travel at 500mph at sea level never in a million years the air is way to thick the wings etc would fall off in no time only fighter jets can travel that speed at that altitude no way around it.
Just see the videos and calculate the speed of the planes.
Obviously you know nothing about the design limitations of aircraft.
While the limits were definitely being exceeded the possibility of inflight breakup was low.
Whatever pal your gonna live the rest of your life believing your government.
@@acostin4004 So that is your problem...
You do know that the twin towers were designed to take an impact of a 707 should it be lost in the fog etc so with this in mind why did the towers collapse don't tell me jet fuel because its a hydrocarbon it doesn't burn anywhere near the 1000s of degrees as stated also the heat that is produced would dissipate through the rest of the undamaged steel frame like a heatsink so technically the steel would never get that hot do you have any idea how enormous those steel columns were some weighing 50ton a piece its like firing a alluminium beer can at a piece of steel crumple up to nothing maybe a slight exaggeration
im embarrassed that i was ever a conspiracy theorist. these people in the comments sound like absolute idiots. Cant even agree on a theory because they have no evidence to back up their claims.
The "logic" one truther uses to "prove" that the planes were holograms is the same "logic" another truther uses to "prove" that there really was a plane, but it was a military aircraft manned by CIA operatives. It's all ignorance-based conjecture. "Well, to my uneducated eye, it looked like . . ." is not evidence, nor is one's opinion on the US government. Real life isn't like the movies. The truth is not always as exciting as we'd like it to be. Welcome to the side of reason, my friend.
Funny stuff, just like how they found that Red Bandana and Passport of the hijacker, who threw it out the window before crashing.
Why is that so hard to believe? Bloody wake up mate. Open your eyes.
Or, they found it on one of the many body parts that were also ejected from the building when the plane hit it and you're just a dumbass who doesn't understand the difference between facts and delusion.
There never was. Blind I....!
Not possible. Hah
If anything from the plane would survive it's most likely to be the front nose section.Specially the south tower that went through the corner rather than in the middle.The jackers we're in the nose.Parts of them probably ended up on the street below, even a bandana and passport.The amount of paper that went undamaged that day should tell you the randomness and chaos of such forces.
Something hit the building. Only thing left loaded in a pick up truck?
Plane enters the tower, tower burns and collapses.
You expect to recover the entire plane?
@@rinse-esnir4010 it blew up inside the tower
The plane engine that was found nearby was to a plane totally different than the kinds they reported. It was placed there as a prop
CGI planes
both of you are idiots. . the engine matched . .. CGI is for morons
@@ocjon1965 So it's just a coincidence that all the bystanders that just so happened to be recording when "planes" came out of nowhere (except Michael Hezarkhani) have degrees in CGI?
@@jayquinn9157 No, that is just your paranoia showing.
The planes were seen by many people, all kinds of debris and plane contents was recovered.
Only flat earthers still argue that everything is fake.
Why did you decide to be one of them?
@@rinse-esnir4010 they also reported to Find the passports of the terrorists who took over and crashed the planes, in the building debris. How lucky is that? And then all of the same terrorists that were blamed were found still alive in their home countries right after the attacks.
The NTSB will confirm that part - 100% certain , they never miss.
A FOIA response from the NTSB dated 18 July 2008 regarding their records for identifying the aircraft involved reads, "Unfortunately the NTSB doesn't have any records". So no, not 100% at all.
Thats exactly the engine of a KC767 military drone
not familiar with this take, but makes more sense that a commercial airliner hit two buildings and the pentagon parallel to the ground.
You know that a kc767 Is a Boeing 767 ? You genius
@@MMKingofKingz Absolute bullshit. A KC767 is a modified plane drone covered as a Boeing 767 🤡🤡🤡
@@tireja252 It, is really? No you fucking idiot-..
Is this the kind of lame bullshit you "theorists" are resorting to now?
Why not just stick with "Lizard People did it!" because it has the same level of stupid.
Was that debris from flight 11 or 175?
pretty sure its from flight 175
Why is the plane gearing all rusty
Because it isn't made of stainless steel.
Dizzystj because it’s 15 years old.
It came off of the plane in 2001 & has been exposed to the elements.
These 2 skyscrapers were not hit by planes. Both of the buildings were brought down by Nanothermite or a small nuclear bomb....What about building #7...
*These 2 skyscrapers were not hit by planes*
Thousands of Manhattanites disagree with you.
*Both of the buildings were brought down by Nanothermite or a small nuclear bomb*
It's good that you keep your options open. I mean, if it's either/or I'm guessing you don't have evidence of either but a choice is nice!
*What about building #7*
I think leprechauns got that one.
Why not both planes and then the controlled demolition?
@@christopherlowry418 Yes, why settle for one piece of candy when you can have it all?
These guys work in Hollywood. It's part of Optimus Prime a scene in the new Transformers movie
Wtf would they even do with that chunk of metal