I agree. Plus 1080p is a great resolution that still looks good. Any game that does struggle can be solved with a frame generation mod. I was able to play many games at 1440p with such a mod using quality settings. All of that while using such little electricity for a GPU is a win win situation.
me gusto mucho la comparativa, me va super bien y eso que lo uso a 2560x1440p con un procesador ryzen 7 5700X. Realmente cumple su objetivo para lo que uso, y por los 189.99usd que me costo es todo un acierto
I really hope b580 will be faster in 3rd party benchmark from what intel suggested, otherwise, 25% performance uplift from a750, when a750 can't even beat 6600 on some games, that will only put it on the range of 6650xt or 3060, we desperately need competition at lower end otherwise Nvidia and AMD gonna throw us yet another 8gb gpus at this price point.
It's hard to say since I've heard the B580 will perform along the lines of the Nvidia 4060 Ti while also offering some additional boosts with XESS FG. If it performs like a 3060 or 6600 then it'll be a flop. It's supposed to be a good 1440p GPU and I hope it is. The extra VRAM should be helpful at 1440p too, so here's to high hopes. The B570 might be like what you mentioned though or possibly even faster from what I've seen on paper. At $250 for the B580 they definitely need it to perform well and undercut the competition or they won't last much longer and will be known as a failure when it comes to dGPUs. If it performs well in games and has the standard excellent media engine then it'll be a win win. I preferred the Arc AV1 encodes over what Nvidia offers and definitely over AMF. I did a side by side comparison using the same bitrate so it was fair and Arc looked better at even a lower bitrate which I tried after the first test. AMD really needs to up their game when it comes to AMF since it's subpar compared to the Nvenc and Quicksync. It's a great bonus for many of us, so I'm hoping for gaming performance and excellent media capabilities via Quicksync. I guess we'll see soon. 😁 I'm excited to get my hands on one soon. I hope stocking issues will not be a problem which is what I'm worried about now. Hopefully my worries are wrong though.
It's the first generation, I'm impressed that a 180 dollars GPU from their first generation can keep up with a 200-230 dollar GPU from a company that has YEARS making them
@@muhasrulsetiawan482 honestly I think I'm going to upgrade my GPU (GTX 1650) for an Intel Arc a750 that is 180 dollars on Amazon (I'm not from the USA and if I purchase something that is over 200 my country demands 18% of the product value for taxes)
@@mememania4500 in my country, the new rx6600 is $178, and new intel arc 750 is $200, for more wattage and lower fps. fortunately, i 've already got scond hand asus rx6600 xt dual (like new, warranty on) for $153
@muhasrulsetiawan482 in my country is the opposite, the rx6600 is like 250-260. The Arc a750 is 170-180. For the wattage I don't have an issue, I have a 650 watts PSU 🤷🏾♂️
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 Performance Test:
RX 6600 - ruclips.net/video/zJbyIZZsT5Q/видео.html
RX 6650 XT - ruclips.net/video/bhKSJQsqh8Q/видео.html
Arc A750 - ruclips.net/video/4qSZ_C1WqsA/видео.html
RTX 2080 - ruclips.net/video/BHvjLmsf6SI/видео.html
RTX 2060 - ruclips.net/video/2-hSVgXjuoc/видео.html
RX 580 - ruclips.net/video/ZSqy2oGc3ww/видео.html
RX 5700 XT - ruclips.net/video/hTsl4fXMM3s/видео.html
GTX 1080 Ti - ruclips.net/video/DM9XGZwKFx4/видео.html
GTX 1060 - ruclips.net/video/aXF3WjAnTgU/видео.html
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
00:14 S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2
01:01 (FSR 3.1 FG ) S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2
01:45 Silent Hill 2 Remake
02:33 God of War Ragnarök
03:21 (FSR 3.1 FG) God of War Ragnarök
04:05 Black Myth: Wukong
04:54 Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
05:46 Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
06:35 Dragons Dogma 2
07:25 Alan Wake 2
08:15 Final Fantasy 16
09:05 Counter Strike 2
09:53 Red Dead Redemption 2
10:46 Average FPS
Gaming PC Specifications:
► CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 7600X amzn.to/3RAlT9P
► Motherboard : MSI PRO X670-P WIFI amzn.to/4bb5Tlx
► RAM : 32GB (2*16GB) DDR5 6400MHz CL32 amzn.to/3VAZ6fn
► CPU Cooler : MSI MEG Coreliquid S360 CPU Liquid Cooler amzn.to/3VAzKOn
► PSU : CORSAIR RM1000X - 1000 Watt PSU amzn.to/3RE9sK5
► GAMING SSD : WD BLUE SN570 2TB amzn.to/3VwgD8d
► Recorder : Corsair Elgato HD60 X amzn.to/4c6BZjC
► OS : Windows 11 Pro (x64) Build 24H2
► GPU 1 : intel ARC A750 LE
► GPU 2 : SAPPHIRE RX 6600 PULSE
► Drivers : intel 101.6299 Beta & AMD Adrenaline 24.10.1 Drivers
That energy efficiency from the 6600 is so good.
I hope Intel can keep up with the competition with driver improvements and battlemage, because better competition is good for consumers
Well another year and the Rx 6600 can still run games at a playable fps at 1080p 👍
I agree. Plus 1080p is a great resolution that still looks good. Any game that does struggle can be solved with a frame generation mod. I was able to play many games at 1440p with such a mod using quality settings. All of that while using such little electricity for a GPU is a win win situation.
@@dont99know Which mod are u using ?
Ага новая marvel около 90 без fsr
Remembering that apart from the architectural problems, Intel has not released any optimization drivers for Stalker 2 yet.
me gusto mucho la comparativa, me va super bien y eso que lo uso a 2560x1440p con un procesador ryzen 7 5700X. Realmente cumple su objetivo para lo que uso, y por los 189.99usd que me costo es todo un acierto
hope that b580 will be much better with drivers
It's been almost 3 yrs and they still haven't optimized drivers of the ARC they never will.
I really hope b580 will be faster in 3rd party benchmark from what intel suggested, otherwise, 25% performance uplift from a750, when a750 can't even beat 6600 on some games, that will only put it on the range of 6650xt or 3060, we desperately need competition at lower end otherwise Nvidia and AMD gonna throw us yet another 8gb gpus at this price point.
It's hard to say since I've heard the B580 will perform along the lines of the Nvidia 4060 Ti while also offering some additional boosts with XESS FG. If it performs like a 3060 or 6600 then it'll be a flop.
It's supposed to be a good 1440p GPU and I hope it is. The extra VRAM should be helpful at 1440p too, so here's to high hopes. The B570 might be like what you mentioned though or possibly even faster from what I've seen on paper.
At $250 for the B580 they definitely need it to perform well and undercut the competition or they won't last much longer and will be known as a failure when it comes to dGPUs. If it performs well in games and has the standard excellent media engine then it'll be a win win. I preferred the Arc AV1 encodes over what Nvidia offers and definitely over AMF. I did a side by side comparison using the same bitrate so it was fair and Arc looked better at even a lower bitrate which I tried after the first test.
AMD really needs to up their game when it comes to AMF since it's subpar compared to the Nvenc and Quicksync. It's a great bonus for many of us, so I'm hoping for gaming performance and excellent media capabilities via Quicksync. I guess we'll see soon. 😁 I'm excited to get my hands on one soon. I hope stocking issues will not be a problem which is what I'm worried about now. Hopefully my worries are wrong though.
do u have Spec Comparision of intel A770 and latest B580 ?
I only have arc 750 atm.
Rx6600 still rocks🚀🔥
ARC A750 room heater & VGA.
Rx 6600 💪
Re bar on?
Yes
arc a750 drama😅
Average FPS looks wrong: if you add up the total FPS, the 6600 has ~70 fps more than the 750 so it can't have a lower average FPS.
I checked again and its correct. RX 6600 Total avg fps is 684 and I did not include frame gen. fps in total.
@@NJTechBenchmark Thanks! My math ain't mathing today I guess
Ну и кал от интел)
U cannt test a 750 without a intel procesor, u need activte the resise bar, get about 20% more performance
You can? It's called Smart Access Memory for AMD CPU's, literally the same thing.
its not intel feature. Resizable bar can be activate on most motherboard.
Ray traincing pleas
RT is useless in low end cards like this. No FPS to spare.
Stalker and SH2 - Lumen default, you can't play without RT.
@@lewzealand4717 RT is the worst feature ever
AMD fans hate ray tracing.
@@mikymouse7525 no
Intel.....more wattage, for less fps...greaaz..
It's the first generation, I'm impressed that a 180 dollars GPU from their first generation can keep up with a 200-230 dollar GPU from a company that has YEARS making them
@@mememania4500 unfortunately, today;s competitor price goes wild,...just like a candy's price
@@muhasrulsetiawan482 honestly I think I'm going to upgrade my GPU (GTX 1650) for an Intel Arc a750 that is 180 dollars on Amazon (I'm not from the USA and if I purchase something that is over 200 my country demands 18% of the product value for taxes)
@@mememania4500 in my country, the new rx6600 is $178, and new intel arc 750 is $200, for more wattage and lower fps. fortunately, i 've already got scond hand asus rx6600 xt dual (like new, warranty on) for $153
@muhasrulsetiawan482 in my country is the opposite, the rx6600 is like 250-260. The Arc a750 is 170-180. For the wattage I don't have an issue, I have a 650 watts PSU 🤷🏾♂️