Incredible Mistake During Takeoff - American Eagle and United Express Embraer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 май 2023
  • Watch how the pilots of 2 Embraer Jets forgot a critical part of the airplane configuration before takeoff at Los Angeles and Washington Dulles airports.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 264

  • @wjatube
    @wjatube 3 месяца назад +62

    Seeing as those engines are mandatory to actually getting off the ground, to call these incidents 'minor' is a great disservice to everyone entrusting their lives to these airlines.

    • @dheyes803
      @dheyes803 3 месяца назад +3

      Oh, yeah we’ve got to remember to start that other dang engine. MINOR my cow’s britches? Heck I don’t even own a cow. I guess a second engine was never mentioned in the checklist for run-up.

    • @davidquinn6161
      @davidquinn6161 3 месяца назад +1

      Actually, any twin engine aircraft is perfectly capable of taking off with only one engine. There are plenty of examples of engine failure right after lift off. It would require increased runway length to get to rotate speed. Not an excuse, off course.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 месяца назад +5

      @@davidquinn6161no, you can’t take off on one engine starting at zero or low speed. You couldn’t keep the airplane tracking straight down the runway and end up next to the runway.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 месяца назад +2

      The mistake is big, but the incident is indeed minor. The pilots know instantly that something is wrong. Nobody was in any danger.

    • @davidquinn6161
      @davidquinn6161 3 месяца назад +1

      The Embraer in the clip has tail mounted engines that are very close to the centre line of the plane. I think it probably could track track straight. I'd agree with you if the plane had wing mounted engines that are farther from the centre of the plane. Maybe some Embraer pilot could speak to that issue.

  • @JamesStreet-tp1vb
    @JamesStreet-tp1vb 3 месяца назад +44

    Something so rudimentary as starting your engines, forgetting to start them for takeoff is tantamount to forgetting to open your mouth when you're eating.

    • @sebastienducimetiere5344
      @sebastienducimetiere5344 3 месяца назад

      No because they have two engines , it's like opening your mouth while eating and forget that you will also have to open your ass hole a few moment later and then you say "oh shit"
      😆

    • @lindabarrett5631
      @lindabarrett5631 3 месяца назад

      Good analogy.

    • @merlin8537
      @merlin8537 Месяц назад

      Or forgetting to breathe ...

  • @barneyquinn3657
    @barneyquinn3657 2 месяца назад +13

    A good reminder that next time I go for a drive in my car - I'll try to remember to start the engine first.

  • @ROGER2095
    @ROGER2095 3 месяца назад +37

    Takeoff checklist:
    1 - Did you close the doors?
    2 - Are the engines running?

    • @jimwinchester339
      @jimwinchester339 3 месяца назад +3

      3 - Flaps?
      4 - Thrust reversers closed?
      5 - Elevator & Rudder trim good?
      6 - Cabin pressurization set to auto?

    • @johnquillman785
      @johnquillman785 3 месяца назад

      @@jimwinchester339 7-passengers seated ? 8- Karens identified and secured ? 9- Doors are closed ? 10- Wheels attached and ground crew aren't ?

    • @robynzelickson6164
      @robynzelickson6164 3 месяца назад

      My first thought was that they hadn't turned on the #2 engine, or that it might be the flaps as I've read quite a few cases of that happening. But it's kinda derpy to forget to turn on the second engine 🙄 good job saving the day though.👍

    • @dexterpoindexter3583
      @dexterpoindexter3583 3 месяца назад

      0 - Are both pilots on the flight deck?

    • @xizang3815
      @xizang3815 3 месяца назад

      No mention that maybe their landing gear was still down.

  • @gerrycorbino66
    @gerrycorbino66 3 месяца назад +30

    One would think that a quick scan of the engine instrument cluster would have revealed that one of the engines had not been started.

    • @dheyes803
      @dheyes803 3 месяца назад +1

      It’s one of those “duh” instances.

    • @xizang3815
      @xizang3815 3 месяца назад

      See what happens when one THINKS?

    • @JLange642
      @JLange642 2 месяца назад +2

      Exactly! No rpm, EGR cold, numerous indications yet they don't SEE it, even though they look right at it! Glad I never fly regional flights!

    • @cll1639
      @cll1639 2 месяца назад

      @@JLange642 EGT, Lange. :)

    • @TheTrebbieFan
      @TheTrebbieFan 2 месяца назад +1

      When you have a multi-engine rating, always remember you have at least two engines!

  • @davidmccann9811
    @davidmccann9811 3 месяца назад +29

    They were too busy going through the checklist to check how many engines were started.

    • @haiwatigere6202
      @haiwatigere6202 3 месяца назад

      Too busy going through the checklist to go through The checklist.

    • @sagesaith6354
      @sagesaith6354 3 месяца назад +1

      @@haiwatigere6202 the engine start-up is probably near the top of the checklist -- they need another entry just prior to advancing to full throttle for take-off:
      "did you forget to start the second engine again?"

  • @gunwrencher1566
    @gunwrencher1566 3 месяца назад +19

    Glad the warning systems worked.

    • @romanshubin650
      @romanshubin650 3 месяца назад

      In this case if it's not, the aircraft would not be able to reach V1 speed shortly so anyway they would have cancelled take off anyway

  • @jmy6050
    @jmy6050 3 месяца назад +5

    Don't have any confidence in pilots who overlook such a primary and glaringly obvious condition as one engine not running. TWO of them in the cockpit and they BOTH missed it? Unbelievable.

  • @TheJclanton
    @TheJclanton 3 месяца назад +10

    Person sitting by the dead engine must have had a real WTF moment.

  • @mikedriggers3635
    @mikedriggers3635 3 месяца назад +13

    If they overlooked a big something, what small ones are they missing. Scary to think about.

    • @Alta719
      @Alta719 2 месяца назад

      Exactly, the checklists are there to, hello, be checked and verified. What else are they skipping over in their haste, or are there needless items in the checklists that are not needed maybe?

  • @michael.forkert
    @michael.forkert 3 месяца назад +19

    _It’s not a matter of checklist. It’s a matter of incompetence._

    • @cremebrulee4759
      @cremebrulee4759 3 месяца назад +1

      That's why they have checklists, to counteract some of the incompetence.

  • @anthonycapanas2932
    @anthonycapanas2932 3 месяца назад +10

    Before takeoff, wouldn't you scan the engine instruments indicate oil pressures, and EGT readings are both indicating on both engines? It probably been obvious and caught why one set of engine gauges are reading zero.

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 3 месяца назад +1

      Yes.

    • @pascalcoole2725
      @pascalcoole2725 3 месяца назад

      Yupp, agree, though you do this after setting TO-Power.. so the TO Already is initiated then.

  • @kevinmoffatt
    @kevinmoffatt 3 месяца назад +17

    Don't checklists include ensuring both engines on line? Really good that in both cases the automation warned them although the huge swing to starboard at full thrust would have been a clue that something was amiss.

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 3 месяца назад

      No.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад

      Yeah, well, as I said a moment ago in another comment, I suspect that operating (e.g., taxiing) the plane on only one engine is not an approved (or at least, expected) procedure by the manufacturer, so there's no checklist item to verify that both engines are running before takeoff.

    • @sludge8506
      @sludge8506 3 месяца назад

      @@Milesco It’s possible they were near the lowest amount of fuel required for their flight.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 месяца назад

      @@Milescoit’s approved and very common.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад

      @@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Well, I know it's common, but I don't know if it's approved by the manufacturer. Which is why I said I _suspect_ that it's not an approved procedure.
      If you say it is, I'll take your word for it. But then why isn't it on the checklist?

  • @toddkallenbach3904
    @toddkallenbach3904 3 месяца назад +15

    and all four pilots lived in infamy in their airlines for the rest of their careers

    • @sludge8506
      @sludge8506 3 месяца назад +3

      “Hey, aren’t you the guy that forgot to activate the second engine on that Embraer?”
      🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪

    • @RaptorFromWeegee
      @RaptorFromWeegee 3 месяца назад +2

      Not if they were women, trans, POC, or neurodivergent. Then, they're brave survivors.

    • @DukeCannon
      @DukeCannon 3 месяца назад

      Nah, they were immediately hired by PIA

    • @robynzelickson6164
      @robynzelickson6164 3 месяца назад

      🙄😄

    • @robynzelickson6164
      @robynzelickson6164 3 месяца назад

      Awwww. That's not nice. And you missed racist. 😡

  • @Tonystark-ey8oe
    @Tonystark-ey8oe Год назад +6

    MPC❤everytime this guy brings us master piece and we learn something from it even a small a tiny mistakes can make a big disaster….Well big fan of your work buddy 🇮🇳

    • @MPCFlights
      @MPCFlights  Год назад +1

      Thanks Tony!

    • @Tonystark-ey8oe
      @Tonystark-ey8oe Год назад +1

      @@MPCFlights i wish you get lots of subscribers and achieve all your goal’s never forget me buddy✨❤️🇮🇳

    • @robynzelickson6164
      @robynzelickson6164 3 месяца назад

      That's why I watch them. One time, our plane coming in from Miami was late, so I was waiting at the gate with the pilot. I guess he saw that I was looking him over as I always do. Too old? Too young? Too tired? Hung over? Stoned? He asked me if I was nervous and I said yes. He said, "well you don't need to worry about me, you need to worry about those guys down there", pointing at the mechanics on the tarmac, fiddling with the underbelly of the plane. Never forgot that.

    • @georgelovelace602
      @georgelovelace602 3 месяца назад +1

      Mistakes bring the blood that safety rules are written with…

  • @16vr6
    @16vr6 Год назад +17

    We're all human... which is why we have checklists.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад +4

      Absolutely. But I suspect that operating (e.g., taxiing) the plane on only one engine is not an approved (or at least, expected) procedure by the manufacturer, so there's no checklist item to verify that both engines are running before takeoff.

    • @geoh7777
      @geoh7777 3 месяца назад +1

      @@MilescoProvision of checklists apparently is an airline responsibility.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад

      @@geoh7777 You're saying the manufacturer has nothing to do with the creation of checklists?

    • @thud9797
      @thud9797 3 месяца назад +2

      I bet you there was nothing on the checklist saying verify both engines are running. Might be that way now! 🤣

    • @ROGER2095
      @ROGER2095 3 месяца назад

      @@thud9797 That'll be right after, "Did you buy enough fuel? Are you sure?"

  • @donaldwilson5693
    @donaldwilson5693 2 месяца назад +1

    One of the first call-outs after getting cleared for takeoff is "check power". The non-flying pilot is supposed to check the engine power setting and confirm other engine parameters are in the green.

  • @khtlon
    @khtlon 3 месяца назад +7

    No excuses please. In both cases an unacceptable error of judgement. Hundreds of lives at risk

    • @pascalcoole2725
      @pascalcoole2725 3 месяца назад

      Nonsens ! During takeoff
      * the crew would notice lack off power on the engines,
      * Would notice lack of acceleration of the aircraft
      * Would notice not having reached the required TO-Speed at the spefiied distance.
      All reasons to abort the TO but they where warned by the TO-Config disagree.
      No lives at risk here.
      Beside, lives are at risk as soon as you buy an airline ticket.

    • @robynzelickson6164
      @robynzelickson6164 3 месяца назад

      Does the plane make a funny noise if you didn't start both engines, or is that dumb? 🙄

    • @pascalcoole2725
      @pascalcoole2725 3 месяца назад

      @@robynzelickson6164 It does (modern planes at least).
      It's called a TakeOff Config warning.
      If your flaps are not set, your trim position is out of TakeOff range and such.
      The warning system is usualy activated if one off the trottles goes beyond beyond reasonable taxi power and warns if one of the named parameters are not met.
      It's not dumb ! It's a usefull system as it saves lives.
      Most warning systems are.

    • @cll1639
      @cll1639 2 месяца назад

      Bullshit. The aircraft's warning systems alerted them immediately to an engine failure which was quickly determined to be due to a no-start. For what it's worth, an ERJ145 holds 50 passengers. And it wasn't judgment - in neither case did the pilots simply make a decision to leave one of the engines cold.

    • @cll1639
      @cll1639 2 месяца назад

      @@robynzelickson6164 Not dumb, but no. Probably not even audible in the cockpit, anyway, other than the warning from the engine-fail alert system.

  • @JEHOVYIREH
    @JEHOVYIREH Год назад +3

    Execelente información video y fotografía aéreas siempre sobrante Mauricio Pérez saludos cordiales 💯🇨🇴✈️🙏🙌 bendicione .
    !Cuando puedes hacer el vuelo 66 de airfrance en algunos de tu canales ?

  • @pop5678eye
    @pop5678eye 2 месяца назад +1

    This is one of those 'did you remember to press the on button' moments...

  • @helpful5539
    @helpful5539 2 месяца назад +1

    I don't care what people think and I understand running the engines as little as possible and fuel saving, but I would want to know both engines have been run a decent amount of time to make sure they are ready to go. Get them both online as you are taxiing out. Cure most of the likelyhood of this kind of mistake.

  • @jkelly1a
    @jkelly1a 2 месяца назад +1

    American Eagle pilots covering and lying about the mistake makes it more serious.

  • @usmale49
    @usmale49 Год назад +3

    Great video and such beautiful "birds"...too bad they have such "ill trained" pilots! Thank you for uploading and sharing! ✈✈😊

  • @davidwheatcroft2797
    @davidwheatcroft2797 3 месяца назад +5

    Today, all checklists MUST be short, and IF interrupted, MUST go back to the beginning.

    • @cremebrulee4759
      @cremebrulee4759 3 месяца назад

      I think they have changed them so that they have sections, rather than one long checklist.

    • @RaptorFromWeegee
      @RaptorFromWeegee 3 месяца назад

      maybe better for airlines to get rid of racism first!

    • @pascalcoole2725
      @pascalcoole2725 3 месяца назад +1

      Thats a good solution !

    • @davidwheatcroft2797
      @davidwheatcroft2797 3 месяца назад

      @@RaptorFromWeegeeRacism is an easy abuse. It is over used, and now is meaningless. Is part of the whole silly trans women thing - one claims to be pregnant. I was raised by a black woman, Zena. Chap called Mikhail, a servant, would walk 2 miles to buy me condensed milk when we were being starved at our isolated school - whipped with heavy duty electric cable. Never asked to be paid!

    • @davidwheatcroft2797
      @davidwheatcroft2797 3 месяца назад

      @@pascalcoole2725This is SO important! Forgetting slots/slats/flaps will KILL everyone on board. In the RAF, we had to know our checks by memory, and I always said mine out loud to increase my chance of actually dong them - still tried to take off with fuel cock closed once when rushing! Big red flag in front of my face and still missed it. Engine stopped as I lined up. Phew! In flying you CANNOT be too careful.

  • @tdr2101
    @tdr2101 3 месяца назад +5

    THAT IS FOR FUEL LESS CONSUMPTION

    • @gerardmoran9560
      @gerardmoran9560 3 месяца назад

      It is. And the airlines save thousands of pounds of fuel per day. Over my career I've done countless "delayed start" operations. I've never attempted a takeoff with an engine shutdown. The problem isn't trying to save fuel- whether it's for the environment or for shareholder value, it's a problem of experience and training.

  • @Jman531
    @Jman531 3 месяца назад +4

    Sounds like they need to put, [start 2nd engine] in the taxi checklist, if they are going to wait until they get close to the runway. Either that or stop all pilots from doing it this way. To be safe, make it the final taxi checklist item.

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 3 месяца назад

      You may not be aware that pilots taxi on less than all engines when able to save fuel costs for their airline. Many FAR part 121 airlines have less than all engine taxi as a company required standard procedure. Pilots do not get paid extra for the fuel they save

  • @robertfencl4401
    @robertfencl4401 3 месяца назад +4

    Only the best & the brightest? God help us all!

  • @claytonsanders508
    @claytonsanders508 4 месяца назад +10

    Number of crew and passengers unknown??

    • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
      @thedevilinthecircuit1414 3 месяца назад

      Unknown because the FAA and NTSB didn't investigate. Only internal airline reports.

  • @ggeorge4144
    @ggeorge4144 2 месяца назад +1

    This is complancency. These pilots get into a rut doing the same thing over and over again. As a charter pilot, flight instructor, and aerobatic pilot there is no room for complacency. When your job becomes a rut it's time to get another.

  • @eucliduschaumeau8813
    @eucliduschaumeau8813 Год назад +4

    I just don't understand how a pilot can NOT look at his EPR gauge when taxiing for takeoff. Wouldn't that be an important thing to look at during the start, run-up, taxi and takeoff? It would be easier if they just lit both engines before or during pushback. Doesn't engine 2 also run the electronics?

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 3 месяца назад

      EPR gauges generally don't indicate any EPR during taxi, only when the power is increased above ground idle

  • @yabadabado7442
    @yabadabado7442 3 месяца назад +2

    Here's an idea. Make it mandatory that both engines must be on when leaving the gate. Oh, but we gotta save money on fuel. I guess gambling with people's lives in order to save money is worth the risk.😊

    • @sdlcman1
      @sdlcman1 2 месяца назад

      All the airlines go to extraordinary lengths to save fuel and prolong the lives of the jet engines. These kinds of planes make a lot take-offs and landings everyday.

  • @djytonly5653
    @djytonly5653 2 месяца назад

    Well, humans don't forget things by importance, but also by the level of stress or distraction. So, there were warning systems installed to avoid this becoming dangerous and those worked out within seconds. They worked out the problem and were safe. So, apart from the one mistake, everything was fine. Planes and procedures are designed in a way that a single error normally doesn't cause a deadly situation. And this philosophy worked out here. The pilots may have learned an important lesson and I wish them all the best for future.

  • @arribaficationwineho32
    @arribaficationwineho32 2 месяца назад

    We depended on AE to get to small town airport. Hated those planes.

  • @stevesayre9363
    @stevesayre9363 3 месяца назад +1

    Do these aircraft have takeoff configuration alarms, and if so, is this situation (one engine started) a condition that triggers it?

    • @MatyasArby
      @MatyasArby 3 месяца назад

      Yes, but they don't check the engines, only parking brake and flap setting

  • @colinmccarthy7921
    @colinmccarthy7921 2 месяца назад

    Mistakes do happen.I was glad to see no loss of Life,Etc..

  • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
    @thedevilinthecircuit1414 3 месяца назад +1

    "Engine failure on number two."
    [Scans instruments and sees #2 RPM and EGT are both zero]
    "DAMN, that engine failed and cooled off fast."

  • @merlin8537
    @merlin8537 Месяц назад

    I only piloted a small ga aircraft for twelve logged hours but I remembered to start the engine on every flight.

  • @jamescain6414
    @jamescain6414 2 месяца назад

    As the witch doctor said, "If you want your boomerang to come back, you first have to throw it."

  • @jefferytokarsky1930
    @jefferytokarsky1930 2 месяца назад

    Some checklist. Isn’t there any check on engine gauges?

  • @randyporter3491
    @randyporter3491 2 месяца назад

    I was thinking back and I can't remember ever attempting a takeoff without starting the engine on my 182.

  • @robertfencl4401
    @robertfencl4401 3 месяца назад +2

    Time to shut down the Kmart School of Aviation!

  • @JohnHill-qo3hb
    @JohnHill-qo3hb 2 месяца назад

    So I hope the preflight checklist has the statement, "Prior to Takeoff roll, be sure both engines are running". I'm not a pilot but the view of the second AC, even I could see that engine #2 gauges were not moving, I would think someone on the flight deck would scan the instruments for normal indications.

  • @fredcanavan3864
    @fredcanavan3864 3 месяца назад

    I flew the plane for United express and I think both pairs of pilots should’ve been pulled off their flights, and given a pee test. I also think the cockpit voice recorder would’ve shown them both bullshitting the entire time. There’s a good 10 minutes from the gates they use at Dulles and the standard takeoff runway 27. They were definitely not too busy.

  • @jimkidd53
    @jimkidd53 3 месяца назад +1

    If you're too dumb to start the engines the FAA should have grounded these pilots permanently. No way I'd put my life in these guys hands.

  • @naknaksdadn572
    @naknaksdadn572 3 месяца назад +1

    Cripes! This is plain ridiculous!

  • @MVPaneeVino
    @MVPaneeVino 2 месяца назад +1

    There were stories during the fuel shortages of 727s taxing with their middle engine shut down to save fuel and forgetting to start it before the runway and rushing to get it lit. Are they true? Don't know....wasn't there but I can see it happening.

  • @Ukarumpa2005
    @Ukarumpa2005 2 месяца назад +2

    what pilot does not monitor their engine power as they start increasing power for takeoff? There are much bigger issues at hand here.

  • @WWPlaysHoldem
    @WWPlaysHoldem 3 месяца назад +2

    Pilot monitoring is the Captain, WTF was he monitoring?

  • @billspooks
    @billspooks 2 месяца назад

    "Pilots, as good as they are, they are not as good as you think they are." said by a former airline captain.

  • @joeglennaz
    @joeglennaz 2 месяца назад

    This might be a little more conceivable if it was a 747 with four engines you could possibly see for getting one of them I guess but as another convent mentioned, a scan of the instruments would show one is not running

  • @malcolmwhite6588
    @malcolmwhite6588 Год назад +2

    In my opinion this is a flaw in the aviation industry (to call this a minor incident ) my background is petrochemical industry in that industry event such as this which would have high potential and from decision-making perspective is a major ,so would be treated as if it had a serious outcome and fully investigated which would lead to more widespread recommendations potentially leading to prevention of a full blown accident :imagine what it happened if they continue to take off roll -the aircraft may have veered off at high-speed or they may have attempted to take off and had a Runway overrun. Despite alarms the configuration or other alarm may not sound -this would not be the first time two faults occurred at the same situation

    • @alexanderdavidson7837
      @alexanderdavidson7837 Год назад +1

      Yeah a full takeoff roll would never have properly commenced. It is serious but the ultimate risk to life would have been very low

    • @sludge8506
      @sludge8506 3 месяца назад

      These planes didn’t *come close* to taking off. Not even close, champ.

  • @duanebidoux6087
    @duanebidoux6087 3 месяца назад

    Wow, I'm glad they didn't actually do it right the first time and make it into the air as a result. Hopefully they woke up after, but it's certainly apparent they weren't the first time. They literally could not have even looked at their engine gauges before roll. So, there's forgetting to start them, and then forgetting to do the ten other things along the way that would have instantly clued you in.

  • @rogergeyer9851
    @rogergeyer9851 3 месяца назад

    There are mandatory checklists for MANY things for virtually all commercial flights. The more problems I see (some of them including fatal crashes), where the flight crew ignored the checklists, the more pissed of I get that there aren't FAR more severe sanctions for this.
    It's one thing to have a surprise equipment failure or get confused by an emergency. It's quite another to not bother to do your job when you have the lives of many people in your hands.

  • @redbird444
    @redbird444 2 месяца назад

    The new breed of less experienced pilots coming out of “puppy mill” training.

  • @johndormer9297
    @johndormer9297 3 месяца назад

    These are the last pilots to skip checklist items ever again. If you are ever on their flights the check lists will be thoroughly followed. The humiliation alone has made them more professional and I believe that.Flying in todays world is fraught with distractions. Everyone and everything works against a safe outcome. Hence things like check lists. Good lessons learned here.

  • @TommyG11814
    @TommyG11814 2 месяца назад

    Neither seen that one of the engines was never started , there are gauges in front of them ,,, WOW. Have no words.

  • @psalm2forliberty577
    @psalm2forliberty577 2 месяца назад +5

    Don't be hard on these guys.
    We ALL make mistakes right ?
    Like the other day, I tried to leave home and after 20 minutes in my driveway, the unchanging scenery reminded me, I forgot to start my engine.
    MY BAD !!!

  • @marksc1929
    @marksc1929 2 месяца назад

    38000 ft ……“ these engines are running great !! .. can’t even hear them !! “

  • @p.macdermott2490
    @p.macdermott2490 3 месяца назад

    There are gauges on the console which indicate the engine power and temperature levels. To "forget" These mandatory and basic tasks is criminal, putting the lives of the passengers at risk. They should be grounded permanently.

  • @evanlinn5869
    @evanlinn5869 3 месяца назад

    Definitely the lowest marks ever for situational awareness that didn’t result in personal injury or property damage. These “airmen” really had to work at these incidents.

  • @andystocks3252
    @andystocks3252 3 месяца назад

    The answer to these incidents is easy, the root cause is an abnormal preflight situation of only taxiing on one engine. Because of the proximity of the thrust of the engines to the centreline of the fuselage, that is possibly in these aircraft. However, the fuel saved is minuscule! The effective way to stop these incidents happening is to mandate that a taxi must not commence until both engines are running! SIMPLES

  • @jbenthere627
    @jbenthere627 4 месяца назад +1

    Airlines worldwide should ensure that flight crews do not communicate with the tower while a checklist is being performed. More so with approach control if possible. I've watched too many recreation videos where there were fatal and preventable crashes due to interrupted checklists, resulting in flaps and slats not being deployed, etc. Distractions can kill.

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 3 месяца назад

      Don't know which "there" you have been to, but it must have not been in the air flying a plane talking to ATC. If a pilot were to tell a controller "stand by, we are doing checklists", you would find yourself sent to the penalty box on the ground or given holding instructions or never ending radar vectors prior to landing. If you flew for a living or even pleasure you would have learned this the first few times you flew.

    • @sludge8506
      @sludge8506 3 месяца назад

      @@gordonbryan8381 He’s a Cub fan, so he’s probably a little slow.
      🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @greatwhitewing
    @greatwhitewing 3 месяца назад +1

    WOW, forgot to start an engine. Drug test those pilots

  • @mitseraffej5812
    @mitseraffej5812 3 месяца назад

    The root cause was the company trying to maximise profits. The accountants would have calculated that by delaying the second engine start they could save a couple of dollars in fuel per flight which all adds up.

  • @inttubu1
    @inttubu1 2 месяца назад

    Prior take off all both cockpit crews had a short meal of juicy carrots

  • @johnwhitmore5408
    @johnwhitmore5408 2 месяца назад

    When you board a commercial airliner, who have no idea who is in the cockpit or how competent they are. A scary scenario.

  • @peggyl2849
    @peggyl2849 2 месяца назад

    Thank goodness the planes noticed something was wrong, right away!

  • @pdalia100
    @pdalia100 2 месяца назад

    What ever happened to checking oil pressure and engine temps?

  • @zk9058
    @zk9058 3 месяца назад

    I thought the embraer 135/145 has a TO config check?

    • @skippymon
      @skippymon 3 месяца назад

      Ironically the TO config doesn't check number of engines running.

  • @merlin8537
    @merlin8537 Месяц назад

    At least they heeded the rnginr alarm...

  • @theChickenstones
    @theChickenstones 3 месяца назад

    One can only imagine the shame or blaming in the cockpit...

  • @DukeCannon
    @DukeCannon 3 месяца назад

    They should put a post it note on the dash.

  • @MrJodyh54
    @MrJodyh54 3 месяца назад +3

    Being so cheap onfuel and not starting both engines at the same time!

    • @sludge8506
      @sludge8506 3 месяца назад

      It’s possible they were near the lowest amount of fuel required for their flight.

    • @m.f.m.67
      @m.f.m.67 3 месяца назад

      Almost guaranteed. Airline management policies are often the root issue behind problems like this one. Managment has cut fuel on board to the absolute minimum. Hense the need to wait to the last possible minute before starting the second engine.@@sludge8506

  • @desdicadoric
    @desdicadoric 3 месяца назад

    Today my kids interrupted me so often I forgot to put dinner in the oven, despite it being on, this caused a 20 minute delay, imagine this being possible on an airplane and it being the engine! Unbelievable

  • @jimsanders4412
    @jimsanders4412 3 месяца назад

    Exactly the reason I much prefer to drive!!😉😄

  • @sagesaith6354
    @sagesaith6354 3 месяца назад

    umm -- aren't "Start engine #1" *AND* "Start engine #2" both on the checklist somehow ... ?

  • @GrantJohnston-dr9rt
    @GrantJohnston-dr9rt 3 месяца назад

    Empty coffee cup on throttle as reminder, like the pros do!

  • @billhillegass946
    @billhillegass946 2 месяца назад

    Makes you wonder if when landing do they check for 3 green or assume all is good .

  • @lbowsk
    @lbowsk 3 месяца назад

    I flew a lot of different multi-engine planes over three decades. I never once saw one that had - "Engines"......................" ON" on the checklist.

  • @iamme453
    @iamme453 2 месяца назад

    Isn't there some kind of indicator that only one engine is operational?

  • @Nitephall
    @Nitephall 3 месяца назад

    I'm just never getting into a plane again.

  • @ignoranteaching
    @ignoranteaching 2 месяца назад

    Better do EOT for taxi in. Not out.

  • @RaptorFromWeegee
    @RaptorFromWeegee 3 месяца назад

    THIS is why I hate to fly on all those little airplanes they got out now, those regional jets. The pilots are all low hour, young guys in their 20s. I swear, some of those regional jet pilots look like they're still in their teens.
    With the shortage of pilots they got now, I wouldn't put it over them to be hiring unqualified pilots. And on top of THAT they're prioritizing DEI hires! As a business traveler this is giving me a heart condition.
    With the full sized jets, 737s, A320s, 757s, at least you could be assured their pilots were high-hour, ex-military guys in their 40s or 50s.

  • @Robert-fv3vn
    @Robert-fv3vn 2 месяца назад

    PreFlight checklist are written in blood

  • @timothyorendorff7642
    @timothyorendorff7642 3 месяца назад

    Incredible to not verify both engines running, seems elementary but a sign of our times. At least the systems worked to abort.

  • @holywells
    @holywells 3 месяца назад

    LOL....they should make these guys fly only turboprop aircraft such as the King Air!! It's easy to see those engines running!!!

  • @scotty6346
    @scotty6346 3 месяца назад

    Do the pilots not instrument scan? Unbelievable!

  • @bobvid7791
    @bobvid7791 3 месяца назад

    HIRE THE GUY FROM NASCAR --- GENTLEMEN , START YOUR ENGINES ( THEN GO )

  • @bwbw1341
    @bwbw1341 3 месяца назад +3

    Maybe putting a sticky note on the inside of windshield would help them remember

  • @hughroney6342
    @hughroney6342 3 месяца назад

    6 Pilots should be walking!! A scan of the gauges before Takeoff would tell them one engine wasn't running! Total stupidity

  • @JBSmoke1
    @JBSmoke1 3 месяца назад +3

    Just a Private Pilot here - I would think that these highly trained ATP rated pilots would still have the common sense to make sure that BOTH engines are running before taking the runway. I guess that wasn't on the checklist.

    • @gnescom
      @gnescom 3 месяца назад +1

      Procedure-save fuel

    • @johnstudd4245
      @johnstudd4245 3 месяца назад +1

      And I'm assuming when running up the throttles to take off power you are supposed to at least give a quick once over to the engine parameters to make sure "everything is in the green" and you are making the power you are supposed to have.......on both engines LOL.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад

      I'm not a pilot, but I'm guessing that operating the plane on only one engine is not an approved (or at least, expected) procedure by the manufacturer, so there's no checklist item to verify that both engines are running.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 3 месяца назад

      @@Milescoyou keep saying this over and over again. It’s approved and it’s very common practice.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 месяца назад

      @@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Well, I know it's common, but I don't know if it's approved by the manufacturer or not. Which is why I said I'm _guessing_ that it's not an approved procedure.
      If you say it is, I'll take your word for it. But then why isn't it on the checklist?

  • @fum00A
    @fum00A 3 месяца назад

    I say screw saving money and start BOTH engines in the beginning. How much extra fuel can they use up?

  • @Sparks84
    @Sparks84 3 месяца назад

    Maybe that could get the stewardess to come up there and check it for dim

  • @dougkenny6548
    @dougkenny6548 2 месяца назад

    If you're forgetting to start an engine what else are you forgetting.

  • @merlin6625
    @merlin6625 2 месяца назад

    Duncecaps, even a beginner pilot knows to start engine before flying.

  • @joesullivan8861
    @joesullivan8861 3 месяца назад

    They started both, problem was boeing employees forgot to install 2nd engine

  • @wallacegrommet9343
    @wallacegrommet9343 3 месяца назад

    It doesn’t get better repeating the same mistake

  • @eyebidder
    @eyebidder 2 месяца назад

    the other engine was still shrink-wrapped!

  • @merlin8537
    @merlin8537 Месяц назад

    Captain and First Officer still employed?

  • @robertwolfe8680
    @robertwolfe8680 3 месяца назад

    Don’t they check their instrument panel, even Hellen Keller could see that one engine wasn’t running !