Fury (2014) - Rocket Ambush Scene | Movieclips
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
- Fury - Rocket Ambush: Norman's (Logan Lerman) hesitation proves to be costly for his comrades.
BUY THE MOVIE: www.vudu.com/c...
Watch the best Fury scenes & clips: • Fury (2014) | Movie Sc...
Subscribe and click the bell to be notified of all your favorite movie scenes: bit.ly/2CZa490
FILM DESCRIPTION:
In April 1945, the Allies are making their final push in the European theater. A battle-hardened Army sergeant named Don "Wardaddy" Collier (Brad Pitt), leading a Sherman tank and a five-man crew, undertakes a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Hopelessly outnumbered, outgunned and saddled with an inexperienced soldier (Logan Lerman) in their midst, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds as they move to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
CREDITS:
TM & © Sony Pictures Entertainment (2014)
Cast: Brad Pitt, Jim Parrack, Logan Lerman, Xavier Samuel
Director: David Ayer
Producer: David Ayer
Screenwriter: David Ayer
► Learn more: www.rottentoma...
Watch More:
► Rotten Tomatoes Originals: bit.ly/2D3sipV
► Fresh New Clips: bit.ly/3mJePrv
► Hot New Trailers: bit.ly/2qThrsF
► New TV This Week: bit.ly/3Or3I2w
Rotten Tomatoes MOVIECLIPS is the largest collection of movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes, and lines from all your favorite films.
This scene always stuck out to me. War movies do a great job at showing the viewer a completely zero sided, unbiased view of war. When that man is burning alive, suicide is literally his only sane option. 1 second hes fine, the next, everything already happened and that guy no longer exists.
Yeah not this movie though. The absolute length of the list of inaccuracies and general ‘Hollywood’ super heroism it suffers from really takes away from any meaningful impact. Sure there’s impact and story but it means absolutely nothing if you know the good guy is gonna win no matter what anyway.
@@superduper3722 tell me you misunderstood fury without telling me you misunderstood fury
@ Trained and battle hardened Panzergrenaiders using a Pak40 that prolly blew up countless French tanks, then Soviets, and now American tanks suddenly start missing and fire wildly at a slowly emproaching column of like three tanks? Oh thats right. Brad Pit is invincible until the plot says so.
@@superduper3722 It was late war and the Germans were using kids and untrained civilians to defend the Reich so its not super inaccurate.
@@soapfrfr Fury really does a meh job at telling the story of American tankers, they were not outnumbered in the slightest, it was the other way around, and the Tiger V Sherman scene was a complete product of Hollywood film making, once you take a deeper look into the movie, you realize it's really just an alright movie
Norman: He was just a kid
But he only saw vague shadows in the woods.
Hate to tell you this but in war, a vague shadow can either mean civilians or an enemy combatant, the only way you'll find out if it you've been hit by gunfire or a RPG or gun down the vague shadow
@redactedagentdataexpunged9431mm sea como sea igual le hubiese retado ya sea por alucinar por ver sombras vagas o no disparar los otros estaban ahí para atormentarle si el hubiese disparado tal vez no hubiésemos tenido el norman final cuando ya por fin es un soldado y no tiene miedo
@@Dr.phosphorus-z3h es el copiloto osea. Ya de por si que lo regañen por no detectar bien un enemigo esta todo mal ese es mayormente el trabajo del que lo regaña el comandante el copiloto no puede gritar que hay alguien y sea falsa alarma el grito se escucharia mas lejos que los propios motores del tanque y seria revelado su posicion con otras unidades cercanas por eso queria confirmar si era un enemigo o su imaginacion por que realmente un tanque en movimiento y llegas y ver sombras en un bosque muy pocos lo notan por algo esta el comandante ARRIBA. La culpa no es de nadie en si pero no hay que echarle la culpa a uno solo
I remember the first time I watched this movie, this scene stuck with me for literally days after. Like, we understand watching war movies that they're going to be violent, but this was on another level. I have to say, Fury is definitely one of the grittiest war movies ever made.
Ever watch saving private ryan?
Ever watch Stalingrad 1993?
haven't watched many war movies eh.
@@stubbornhat2346 Saving Private Ryan is only really notable for its opening sequence, which indeed is one of the most violent 20 minutes ever put to film. Sure, the battle at the end is also intense, but it doesn't hold a candle to the first 20 minutes. When I say "gritty" I mean where you just feel genuinely unsettled, throughout the movie. SPR was intense for the first 20 minutes and the last half hour, but the rest in between was simply world building and character development. This is essential for this particular film, but it doesn't make it the most disturbing.
Fury sucks in large portions.
Only pros:
- great Equipment
- US soldiers who commit war crimes
War is Hell, kid.
history tends to rhyme but never repeat. You all gotta solution?
I never got why Wardaddy immediately assumed Norman had seen the kid and refused to shoot. It's exactly what happened but there was no way for him to know that. The kid could have been behind a tree or concealed otherwise, in which case he would have reasonably not been able to spot him. Feels a bit odd every time i watch this scene.
He knows Norman never shot a single round. And when Norman says "he was just a kid" it can be inferred he was not willing to shoot at the Germans
@@BansheeVi But why was Norman even confronted like that? Once he confessed, it was obvious that the accusation was valid but it's not obvious why it was assumed that he had seen the kid in the first place. Wardaddy had better vantage point from the commander position but didn't spot the ambush either. The immediate reprimand does not seem logical. A more logical question would have been 'didn't you see him?', which in turn could have led to the discovery of his deliberate lack of action. In this case the scolding we see here would have had a more logical prelude.
@ppjk5203 if he was told to watch the right side, yet did nothing to combat the right side. I'd say wer daddy's reaction is justifiable and makes sense
A wierd thing is also the fact that even if normann wanted to kill that machine gun he wouldnt even have been able to as that machine gun can only turn so much. Not all crewmen were given an smg either and its unlikely he would have been able to do much with his pistol
@@ppjk5203 I think Wardaddy meant Norman didn't fire after the German already fired the Panzerfaust. Once Norman says he didn't fire because the other guy "was just a kid", I think only then Wardaddy realized Norman seen the German before he fired the Panzerfaust and only then blamed Norman for what happened.
you see that city over there? that's an entire city on fire (points to dresden) - line from fury that stuck
Just bear in mind that the city center of Dresden was destroyed in the firestorm, that's 6.5 sq km. That's 6.5 sq km out of 330 sq km of the city, so no it was NOT an entire city, more like a little more than 2%. Feel free to look it up if you don't believe a random guy on comments.
@@Jameson-d8x that's cooked 20k-35k people. sounds like a population of a city in ancient times to me
@@MasterSloggoroth population was 750k at the time.
It was a disaster, borderline war crime, etc., but the headlines are always "Dresden destroyed" and things like that, but it wasn't. Just saying...
@@Jameson-d8xyou have never heard of a figure of speech huh? stay in school kids…
@@TimeToGetFunkyy lol, as if anyone is aware of that 2% of the city was destroyed when the "city of Dresden was destroyed". Apparently, you're new to the discussion. Try to keep up.
1:23 quite a harsh way to talk sense into rookies
Inglorious Basterds
Yes it is harsh but think about there was probably one of his buddies that got killed
Norman needed to hear this, I don’t blame him either but he needs to know how intense the situation is here
@@christianaguiare544 War is brutal.
But it is the reality of truth. A rookie needs to know this is our job as a team trying to protect each other while fighting off the bad guys 😢
It bugs me how in this film we see five Shermans get knocked out and only one man (Norman) out of twenty five crew survives.
One too many.
@@jamestaylor1984 The reality was that an M4 getting KO'd usally resulted in one killed and one WIA on average.
@@MagpieOz yeah, I know that it was rare for an AT round knock-out of a tank to kill the entire crew.
I just hate this movie so much, and would have been satisfied to see them all smoked and the film end 60 minutes earlier!
Best part is a kid was the one that didn't rat Norman out in the end hiding under the tank.
0:49 SELF DESTRUCTION ACTIVATED
Brad pitt is a great actor hollywood just needs to stop putting him on war movies, it's just not working
Idk why it took me this long to realize, but did anyone else noticed how long it took for the tank commander to get out the tank? My best guess is that other crew mates (gunner and loader) were pulling him down to pull themselves out because they are either below or besides him
I don’t like Logan Lerman for what he did in ‘Noah’. But in this one, he learns a valuable lesson. NEVER. TRUST. YOUR. ENEMY. Not even if he/she is a man, or a woman, or a kid. And I thank Brad Pitt a lot in this badass war movie for teaching him.
0:49 he didn’t want to feel the pain of being burned alive😕
Where is that actor now?
I can't even imagine the pain. Maybe I just don't want to.
As soon as a child picks up a weapon, they are no longer a child, they are a soldier. If you're old enough to shoot at someone, you're old enough to get shot, it's the harsh reality of war
And you wonder why the US is collapsing in on itself in 2023 😂😂.
True that.
But,...when you send young men to war by the 100s of thousands, you can expect awkward moments of hesitation and moral confliction in proportional numbers.
Popping cherries isn't pretty.
And it almost always costs in casualties sustained.
i.e.:, someone else in the unit dies or gets wounded in the process of newbguy learning the ropes.
@@scorchclasstitan6727 I can think of a reason. The fact that you said 2023 when it's 2024.
@@scorchclasstitan6727the US and China are maintaining the world economy, guy, be thankful the US exists to ALLOW you to post your bs.
@@jpb87
He's got a point, though.
Hmm .. I dont get it?! Why did wardaddy get angry on Norman , unless he reviewd the 'Log Tapes' seeing that Norman Spotted the Enemy & didnt Engaged!? .. what make sense to me is that If Everyone Engaged the Enemy ... & Everyone had A Stg.44 : 7.92 Except Norman .. with a .30 cal. & the Lack of 30-6 cal. bullet Holes Would give Norman Away as he didnt Fired hos weapon !?(when Wardaddy checked the Bodies of The Enemies??)
maybe he noticed Norman looking at something just before the shooting started plus Norman admitted to not shooting because "he was just a kid"
Pretty sure it’s because he was positioned on the side closest to the tree line, making him the lookout for any movement in the tree line. but even after the the panzerfaust was deployed, Norman still didn’t fire. So when wardaddy asks him ”why didn’t you take the shot?” When Norman says it’s because they were kids, Wardaddy likely drew up a conclusion Norman definitely saw the German before the Faust was deployed and froze.
Because Norman is the lookout on that side. It's his job to keep an eye out
I guess "stop, drop, and roll" hadn't been invented yet.
I mean the guys face was melting off and his clothes were soaked in gasoline so i dont think he would of survied
Since when is a Panzerfaust a "rocket"?
Since they designed it? lol, seriously dude...
@@Jameson-d8x Yeah seriously. The warhead did not have a rocket motor propelling it. There was a charge inside the tube that lobbed the warhead out more like a mortar. It was not a rocket.
@@Theakker3B It had a 2 meter backblast, but I guess you're right. I just never thought of an open-ended tube with a backblast as a "recoilless" weapon.
Cheers
@@Jameson-d8x I take it you have never fired a Carl Gustav then, or any other recoiless weapon.
@@MagpieOz No, not personally. Fired AT-4 once, that's as close as I can say. I fully understand how a shaped charge works, but I guess I missed the recoilless class.
" The longer the war.....the younger the soldier" `German soldier`
Can somebody please remind me why these guys didn’t have infantry scouring the forests ahead of the tanks?
Because it's not a war movie, it's just a steaming pile of garbage set during a war.
They were on their way to meet with their infantry
because you can't always get it. I can count on one hand the number of times i've been escorted by infantry in front of me. they've got their own job to do. you often have to travel alone before linking up
Is Pitt using a STG44?
Yes, he captured it from a panzergrendier before the events of the movie
@@ethanmcgowan6926 and conviently has plenty of ammo available for it... It was a very cool rifle for its time and often innacurately described as the basis for the AK-47. That said it would be ludicrous to depend on a weapon for which you had very limited ammunition, parts, and support available for.
@@kennethfharkin
Well it's not something he'd use super often, so not too crazy maybe?
@@kennethfharkin I mean he's a tank commander. He's not gonna be using infantry weapons much and It's not like he can't have anything else stored in the tank while he's using Stg-44 with the limited ammo he has. If he runs out he can just take M3 Grease Gun anytime for example. I think it makes sense
Capturing an enemy rifle wouldn't make that much sense for an infantryman that has to carry his rifle all the time with no weapon to go back to if he runs out of ammo.
This audacious young fellow gave his life for Germany. Truly brave, yet most foolish.
no......tragic and just stupid ....Kids beeing conditioned to do this. and i say this as a german
@@Knuspermonsterjust like you being conditioned to hate your own ancestors and nation because they were brave enough to fight back against outside control?
1:58
Got cha
pretty cool
Not cool
Imagine you being the kid that was in the tank.
Gets hit with one panzerfaust, and instantly blows up and catches fire, all crew dead. Fury, gets hit by half a dozen and survives. That end scene was just one of several that was completely rubbish and utter fake af. This movie was utter garbage. Typical American Hollywood BS.
very true fury would have been taken out in the tiger ambush first as it was first in line plus has the only gun that can challenge a tiger from the front the other three tanks had no chance unless they could get around to the rear of the tiger
Plus the tiger would never come out of the ambush position unless the tanks in the middle could not move since the first and rear tanks where destroyed
ITS A MOVIE. even my WW2 vet gpa said this is more accurate than not.
this is such stupid logic. You're right they should just make a movie where they show all main characters die as soon as possible. You should direct a movie
You direct the next one Mr Speilberg
RUclips: a lot of people were deleted that day.
Rip they tried to save us
Can anyone tell me the type of weapon Brad Pitt was waving around? Being a tank commander, I would've thought that he would have a Garrand tanker.
Sturmgewehr 44
Panzerfäuste weren't rockets but recoilless launchers... Whatever...
Blame Hitler’s youth for doing that. I don’t like for what they did. If you and I were in that savage time, we’d wipe out those sour kraut kids right away.
Blame Hitler’s youth for doing that. I don’t like for what they did. If you and I were in that savage time, we’d wipe out those sour kraut kids right away.
🤓
Nope
An antitank hand projectile with cumulative warhead.
0:09
0:50
What rifles are they using to shot the Germans, like that looks like an stg 44 but that is a German rifle
So much wrong with this.
1st of all. ammo woldof detonated. 2nd of all panzerfaust wouldnt arm at that rang.
1:25-1:27, 1:33-1:39, 1:43-1:45, 1:47, 1:51, 1:58, 2:03-2:13
The most ridiculous WWII movie ever...
Why do the American soldiers have Stg44?
Why not? It was forbidden?
It was looted iirc while they were far from American supply lines. You take what you can get in the rough times
@@Kryptoniano-n6m Typically yes, reason is if you fire the enemies weapon, you will become a target by friendly troops, get shot at, and potentially killed. Further, ammunition would be in short supply. It is unrealistic they would had used the STG 44 as an actual weapon instead of a trophy.
@Elementalism they were far into German controlled lands once you're in enemy lines you have to work with what you can find because you have little to no supply lines
For eye candy. It didn’t make sense unless you had a good supply of ammo
This movie looks terrible
Christopher Nolan Fanboy ?
@antouf8322 I am a fan of Christopher Nolan & David Ayer but this Ayer movie looks absolutely terrible.
Terrible acting, terrible dialogue.
@ lol. You just dont know anything in cinema
@@antouf8322 lol I know a piece of garbage when I see it ;)
average movie critic
☮☮☮
Can't wait till we're in the real thing
Ah, I loved that lieutenant! And wtf on kids?! They should’ve never done that! Now I hate Hitlers youth!
They were literally running out of men... but yes I agree. I'd have sent the women in next, not the kids.
@@ZC.Andrew don’t mention that.
@@O-DogKubrick Do you have autism?
@@O-DogKubrick hey man just a question but are you mentally well?
Now? You mean you were okay with kids holding guns before?
Una de las peores películas de la WW2 x lejos, malos actores, malos argumentos, sin rigor histórico alemanes como ldlotas, y yankis como genios... No vale ni para ver en TV pulgar pa joba
What is Brad Pitt doing with a Sturmgevier?
He looted it from a previous mission.
Bloody awful film - one of the worst 'war' films ever made!
“See what a kid can do?”
Wouldn’t have happened if you stopped doing whatever FDR told you too, 😂.
I’m sure hitler would agree with you 🙄
Wdym
"For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life."(John 3:16)
Uwu
uwu
what "uwu" means 😂
uwu
@@oremilosavljevic309 it means uwu
War is uwu
1:25-1:27, 1:33-1:39, 1:43-1:45, 1:47, 1:51, 1:58, 2:03-2:13