Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Catching Smoke by King Gizzard Is Way More Interesting Than You Think

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 июн 2022
  • Quite a few people enjoyed my short analysis of Shanghai by the Gizz boys, so I decided to make a similar video on Catching Smoke.
    Here's the original song mv, please go check it out: • King Gizzard & The Liz...
    Here's the KEXP performance I used: • King Gizzard & The Liz...
    I hope you enjoy! :)

Комментарии • 86

  • @jae_lee-
    @jae_lee-  2 года назад +23

    hey everyone! if you'd like to see me analyze any other song, please tell me here in the comments! love you all

    • @granted6209
      @granted6209 Год назад +6

      Any song from Polygondwanna would be awesome

    • @artonion420
      @artonion420 Год назад +2

      Please just keep doing this with literally any King Gizz song and I’ll be more than happy. I’ll watch every single vid, I promise you.

    • @richardjones6767
      @richardjones6767 10 месяцев назад +1

      Nuclear Fusion is such a dynamic and interesting songs

  • @shutt398
    @shutt398 2 года назад +72

    Fantastic vid! An alternative title could be "Why king gizzard probably will never play one of their best songs live" lmao I can't imagine how hard it is to practice these polyrhythmms

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +7

      true, I sometimes struggle to keep up with some of the parts, like when the bass and the drums start to play haha
      thank you for watching!

    • @ataraxianAscendant
      @ataraxianAscendant 6 месяцев назад +2

      they've played ataraxia lmao, I think most of it is due to lack of synths in their live gear

  • @OmmieFerguson
    @OmmieFerguson 2 года назад +55

    This is my favourite King Gizzard song ever. Fell in love with it the day it came out and still can't get it out of my head. It's like a virus, it stays and never leaves. Hear it once and you'll be humming all day. Funny thing is, first time you hear it is catchy, silly, funny, and comes off as a mindless even pop-dancey tune but the more you listen to it, the more layers you discover and the deeper and more complex it gets. It truly is a masterpiece.

    • @ajfahrenkamp1
      @ajfahrenkamp1 Год назад +1

      100 agree

    • @matroberts9390
      @matroberts9390 Год назад +1

      Watched it on 'cid with some friends recently, we freaked out how they do not have eyebrows on the video. But what a track!

  • @therobotFrom94
    @therobotFrom94 2 года назад +60

    as a bassist and drummer - I immediately got hooked into this song. usually rather than counting subdivisions I just memorise the feel of a KG song (same with bands like Tool) but Catching Smoke is just too intense for that because of the layered time signatures

    • @mrphysicalsky2330
      @mrphysicalsky2330 2 года назад +4

      That section right before the second verse always gets me. Keeping that specific bass drum pattern going while adding that simple polyrhythm over top sounds fantastic. But its an absolute nightmare to play.

    • @hp2823
      @hp2823 Год назад +3

      Cavs is a legitimate monster to be able to play that

  • @ejakeulate4058
    @ejakeulate4058 2 года назад +135

    hot take this album is their technical masterpiece (so far). much more technically impressive than polygondwanaland imo but also never feels complex for the sake of being complex like poly does sometimes.

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +20

      I fully agree! although I enjoy their "psychedelic" and microtonal sound a bit more (K.G. is one of my favorites) but this album feels more like a band integrating the complexity in a more "musical" way

    • @FisTheEvil
      @FisTheEvil 2 года назад +11

      lmao no

    • @basspuppy133
      @basspuppy133 2 года назад +18

      Nah, I really can't agree with this. Polygondwanaland has a lot more technically difficult passages, signatures, poly rhythms, and scales. Most of butterfly3000 is pentatonic and 4/4 with off-meter bars of 3/4 or 5/4 at the end. Some of the songs have a poly-rhythm with the drums underneath but it's nothing that we didn't hear on KG and LW.
      B3K was an impressive album, but doesn't have the range or technical prowess that poly does. I'd even argue nonagon had more technically intense passages.

    • @queenpurple8433
      @queenpurple8433 Год назад +2

      @@basspuppy133 exactly.

    • @flyingcow9491
      @flyingcow9491 Год назад +4

      B3K initially started as poly 2

  • @sirwojenheimthethird2268
    @sirwojenheimthethird2268 Год назад +11

    Great analysis here. This song might be the ultimate example of prog meeting pop and the two complementing each other. I’m blown away by the tension created by this most playfully of approaches. No one does serious fun like King Gizz. This is their method.

  • @indiepedal
    @indiepedal 2 года назад +10

    one of my favorite bits is at 4:49 (in the track) when the classic gizz crunch guitar joins the bassline, oddly heavy segment for a mostly chill song.

  • @mcmillan.2k
    @mcmillan.2k Год назад +2

    I NEVER NOTICED that the main melody goes out of sync in that part near the end!!!!!!! Your Gizz vids are great

  • @aaronrice4607
    @aaronrice4607 2 года назад +18

    My brain hurts. Amazing. Thank you or the break down. The Gizz are really something!

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +1

      their creativity is incomparable! thank you for stopping by

  • @joeprice8796
    @joeprice8796 2 года назад +19

    Absolutely loved this video as well as the Shanghai video! Having someone explain to me the technicalities behind my favourite band is so cool. Would love to see more gizz analysis!

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +2

      Thank you so much! I'll for sure make more of them, so please feel free to suggest any songs you wanna see

    • @GhibChib
      @GhibChib 2 года назад

      @@jae_lee- I’ve always been interested in how they make that unique psychedelic sound in Lonely Steel Sheet Flyer!

  • @josiek5989
    @josiek5989 2 года назад +6

    Thank you - words cannot express how much I love this song. The drummer in me always counts the snare (backbeat) as being the 2 and 4, so instead of 33, I feel it as 4 bars of 4/4 with an extra 8th note for the last bar. And when the vocals come in - I feel them as 3/8. I think it can be notated so many ways. King Gizzard are geniuses. I love how Cavs times his fills at “president” and “paranoid.” The complexity of the second verse is killer. Would to see you do Black Hot Soup - rhythmically it is even crazier to me.

  • @stellalandin1716
    @stellalandin1716 Год назад +5

    This was so interesting to watch! I’ve never paid attention to the technical side of this song, I just listened to it and thought rhythms were a bit strange and complicated. It was really nice to know what’s actually going on and you did a great job at explaining it!

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  Год назад +2

      Thanks Stella! I'm so glad you enjoyed it

  • @seymour9415
    @seymour9415 2 года назад +10

    My love for this song just deepened. So, so cool.

  • @LaceChaser
    @LaceChaser 11 месяцев назад +1

    Amazing work my friend! Anytime I talk about numbers in music people usually just nod their head and say yeah…mhmm…right…cool… because it suddenly makes the song boring to them.
    So, as a musician… I truly appreciate people like you doing the dirty work and educating those who actually want to be educated to appreciate the true talent behind the songs they love!
    Liked AND subscribed!

  • @eloipa
    @eloipa 2 года назад +17

    Fantastic analysis! I wonder if King Gizzard created such complex structure intentionally.

    • @hippiecheezburger5457
      @hippiecheezburger5457 2 года назад +4

      Maybe maybe not who knows with them, like they seem like your average people in a band but at the same time they’re like musical geniuses

    • @GregorBarclay
      @GregorBarclay Год назад +5

      100%. From experience, you can’t write this kinda stuff by accident.

  • @FreDGuitaRtv
    @FreDGuitaRtv 2 года назад +3

    Very cool!! Love this kind of videos, do more!!

  • @connorperry1467
    @connorperry1467 2 года назад +1

    cool shit man! love this short but deep analysis type vid!!

  • @freiigon6036
    @freiigon6036 2 года назад +4

    Loved your shanghai video and was so excited to see this pop up about another great song. Another commenter brought up a great point about polygondwanaland but I’d love to hear your analysis on one of the songs off that album

  • @miked1311
    @miked1311 2 года назад +3

    Love this band. Universal!!

  • @blakeapher2178
    @blakeapher2178 2 года назад +3

    Such an amazing album and a great breakdown of the song! Ill have to check out another

  • @stephanecarbonneau6725
    @stephanecarbonneau6725 11 месяцев назад

    Brilliant work!!!!!

  • @bingtinsley8087
    @bingtinsley8087 17 дней назад

    Dude you rule! Very good videos analyzing KGLW thank you!!

  • @Syncop8rNZ
    @Syncop8rNZ Год назад

    Great job!

  • @zswqade3q24
    @zswqade3q24 5 месяцев назад

    Nice work

  • @sammyjohnson5596
    @sammyjohnson5596 Год назад

    Thank you this song is so good

  • @daveconnor6174
    @daveconnor6174 2 года назад +2

    hey! great stuff - loved it!
    i was thinking of making a video making the claim that butterfly 3000 is a spiritual successor to polygondwanaland, but then i got lazy and never got around to it. great to see you doin the work and shining a light on some of the album's hidden depths.
    PS. one fun thing i noticed about 'yours' is how the vocal melody is literally the main synth melody at half speed without the bottom notes

    • @daveconnor6174
      @daveconnor6174 2 года назад +1

      oops meant to say quarter speed

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +1

      Hey that's true, I totally forgot to mention it, nice catch! and oh, I wish and encourage people to make videos like this, it's very informative, not only for an audience, but for yourself, I've learned so much music theory only by remaking and analyzing these songs for videos, haha
      Thanks for stopping by!

  • @CrazyFnCrazyMahn
    @CrazyFnCrazyMahn Год назад

    Great breakdown. Thanks! Sorry about your Leafs. Hey, they made it to the 2nd round, though! Enjoy the Gizz.

  • @o_enamuel
    @o_enamuel Год назад +1

    small correction: "[...] they could pick any number *divisor* of 33 [...]"

  • @nilesdelta8636
    @nilesdelta8636 8 месяцев назад

    Great vid thanks

  • @sebastianrogel5738
    @sebastianrogel5738 2 месяца назад

    Nice video and funny dog c:

  • @ajfahrenkamp1
    @ajfahrenkamp1 Год назад

    thank you.

  • @rafaelarnone5887
    @rafaelarnone5887 2 года назад +3

    Wonderfull vídeo tnx

  • @bufferjoetommas
    @bufferjoetommas 10 месяцев назад

    what a structured chaos

  • @treetopgriff4242
    @treetopgriff4242 2 года назад +1

    Funny thing is, this is the song that got me into the band

    • @travisthornton1792
      @travisthornton1792 2 года назад

      Second song for me. “Lord of Lightning” came first. Gave me whiplash

  • @gzig61
    @gzig61 Год назад +1

    Hi I'm a drummer thanks for the breakdown! I've always been curious about the time signature of Red Room by Hiatus Coyote ?

  • @jollygrapefruit786
    @jollygrapefruit786 Год назад

    One of their best songs imo

  • @StellarShrapnel
    @StellarShrapnel Месяц назад

    hey man cool video butt i wanna know what plugins or vst you used in this video?

  • @ps1hagridssbm
    @ps1hagridssbm Год назад

    Great video! Can you analyse "Gaia"? (also from King gizzy)

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  Год назад +1

      It's 100% happening, I just can't tell when it's gonna be released, but stay tuned!

  • @chiyomomoarchive
    @chiyomomoarchive 2 месяца назад

    Can you do “Yours” from this same album?

  • @Richaud89
    @Richaud89 2 месяца назад

    Could you analyze The Wind by PJ Harvey? There's an interesting Jools Holland session where she has the guitar rhythm replicated on drums.

  • @N1njaSquirrel
    @N1njaSquirrel 2 года назад +1

    Amazing deep dive! Now do polygondwanaland!

  • @atomicjay42
    @atomicjay42 10 месяцев назад

    I'm gonna sound stupid here but I've never been able to really figure out time signatures unless it's something really obvious like 4/4 or 3/4. People keep telling me to just "listen to the 'pulse' of the song", and while I get what's meant by that and have sucsessfully figured out some time signatures by listen to the bassline of a given song I can't for the life of me figure stuff out in a case like this where there isn't a clear 'pulse'. It's VERY frustrating for me because it seems to be second nature for so many people, including close friends of mine. How do you even do it??

    • @Happenstance_music
      @Happenstance_music 9 месяцев назад

      You have to try to find the "1". So if 1, 2, 3, 4 doesn't really work out great (the accents seem all random), then probably try counting to 3 instead. If that doesn't work either, you can try counting to 5. However, there are songs (like "pyramid song ~ radiohead") that are in 4/4 but just have very weird accenting, which makes it very hard to figure out.

  • @felixcontreras4451
    @felixcontreras4451 5 месяцев назад

    Like Tool but Happy :)

  • @madazza
    @madazza Год назад

    Send this into space and you will get your reply.

  • @Comrade.Question
    @Comrade.Question 2 года назад +1

    Has Justin Hawkins seen this?

  • @shamancredible8632
    @shamancredible8632 5 месяцев назад

    No thanks, I don't need some college boy music theory hipster telling me what to think about music. If I like it, it's good. If I don't, it's not. Simple as.

    • @porter2024
      @porter2024 4 месяца назад

      You have a point but the video is still cool as a look into the way they composed it. Nobody's saying you have to know all this to like the song or not

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  13 дней назад

      yes I am indeed a college boy music theory hipster I have not seen the sunlight in 14 months. thanks for the view tho

  • @SmallvillenerdTwo
    @SmallvillenerdTwo 2 года назад +1

    It's way more interesting than I think? Tbh I don't think it's that interesting sorry... I know it's a fan favourite but I don't really care for it just because it adds an extra beat every 4 bars and is more complicated than it sounds because that pretty much describes every Gizz song.

    • @jmarvosa6x3
      @jmarvosa6x3 2 года назад +4

      They are a musicians’ musicians… as they say

    • @jae_lee-
      @jae_lee-  2 года назад +4

      You're not wrong at all! It just depends on what you define as "interesting", or "different". All in all, this video just serves as a fun way of analyzing the song :)