2021 Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDI 48V Mild Hybrid (120 PS) TEST DRIVE

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 дек 2024

Комментарии • 27

  • @chopin7777777
    @chopin7777777 3 года назад +1

    Danke schön 🤝

  • @baptpopeil
    @baptpopeil 3 года назад +3

    Why have they shortened the gear ratios ? In normal versions, I remember the gears to be longer. Isn't it counterproductive ? Longer gear ratios to save fuel at higher maintained speed, and mild hybrid to save fuel in the city...

    • @alessandrogabbrielli9951
      @alessandrogabbrielli9951 2 года назад

      I have the previous version (120 ps, manual and no mild hybrid) and the gear ratio is the same. Only the automatic Dtc with 7 speeds have a longer final gear.

  • @Maraaaap
    @Maraaaap 2 года назад

    Great video. Does the led lights come on automatically or is it something u have to pre set ?

  • @carolbernas
    @carolbernas 3 года назад +2

    Honest car. Good looking to. 👍

  • @awdawd4
    @awdawd4 2 года назад

    Im gonna buy GT-line..probably 100ps to have a manual gearbox... Is it worth it to take mild hybrid or without it?..

  • @stavrosr7
    @stavrosr7 3 года назад

    Amazing Video!!

  • @robyfrusca5374
    @robyfrusca5374 Год назад

    Ciao qualcuno mi sa dire perché il coating non sempre funsiona grazie

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 3 года назад +7

    This mild hybrids n&hybrids are more thirsty then ordinary cars without that shit

    • @CheesemanGT
      @CheesemanGT 3 года назад +11

      At point are you going to leave your comfortable little planet of utter delusion and start thinking things through even remotely slightly before posting.
      Hybrids DON'T save fuel at constant speed. Conventional hybrids see negligible improvements at higher speeds but help massively in stop/start traffic. Mild hybrids just give a small assist under acceleration. Is this thirstier than similar cars? Yes. Is that to do with the mild hybrid system? No. The systems make sense for the purposes they are designed for, and hybrids are not designed to save fuel for people sitting at 180kph on the Autobahn. It's almost like complaining when a vacuum cleaner is awful at opening a tin can.

    • @Mamerto.
      @Mamerto. 3 года назад +3

      Hybrids are for cities

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 3 года назад +2

      @@Mamerto. i dont see some low consumption on lower speeds too,for cities are electric cars

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 3 года назад

      @@CheesemanGT mild or nomild like with toyota or others consumption are pretty high so don't bullshits

    • @CheesemanGT
      @CheesemanGT 3 года назад +5

      @@Mr11ESSE111 Take a deep breath and just think about what you said. Drive a Toyota hybrid around a city for an hour, and you'll find absolutely nothing else with an ICE other than plug in hybrids can come even close to it for fuel consumption. Hybrids are designed for urban environments with heavy traffic. This is not a "bullshits", it's fact. If you want to sit on a country road at 60-80kph, a diesel will do better. If you're stuck in rush hour traffic for 2 hours and barely move 10km, the Toyota will hardly have touched it's fuel, while that diesel car will have used possibly 3 times as much. So don't "bullshits" me with your misguided views based on your own delusions which you'll seemingly never be able to let go of.

  • @clgnjack
    @clgnjack 3 года назад

    100hp engine very bad consumption
    120hp very good