Lambda

[@A7480394]

Thank you so much for this. It is remarkable how difficult it is to find information on the calculation of lambda (other than "throw it in SPSS or Excel"...I'm tutoring someone in Statistics and, unfortunately, her Lecturer does not understand the statistics she is teaching...

[@RyanAbbott-m3k]

Thank you for the video. It was a good introduction to Lambda. I'm uncertain of the meaning of "if we know the assiociation between the sex of the respondent". Was that a mistake? Did you mean between sex of the respondant and their life excitement? Are you meaning if we know their sex we will only make 2.7 less errors at predicting their life excitement if we know their sex? If so, why not say it rather than "association between sex of the respondant"?

[@caitlin201]

This was life saving.
THANK YOU

[@lisaball2018]

MANY THANKS!! So glad I found your video! Great explanation!

[@annamusgrave3122]

jfc this is god sent

[@smithsfan425]

So which test would be better to gauge a relationship effect size? Cramer’s V or Lambda?

[@christineiyalla]

Thanks so much u just saved me on this.

[@jayceklept]

Omg thank you so much for this

[@fatimaabuabsa6313]

BLESS YOU

[@Paris11loves]

Thank you so much!!!

[@Bobby-vv6jn]

Saved my life!!!

[@samx36]

LIFE SAVER

[@tuviaf8512]

great vid. Thanks

[@MuhammadAsif-to5fr]

Thanks, please

[@kavyakrishnan2840]

Anybody plz give value of lambda ^1

[@SuzieMacaluso]

If you calculate a lambda over 1 then you've made a mistake somewhere along the way! The bottom number should always be higher than the top in the equation.

[@roshangupta9232]

Finally