Health and happiness to you, too! You said it. The minute I heard about that lens, I pre-ordered it, and a used X1D II body from B&H. It has become my favorite camera to carry around for almost anything. (Especially things that don't move really fast.) Thank you, and take care!
'P' stands for 'Portable' not pancake. I P/X'd GFX50s for this exact thing and it is utterly joyous - far better then the GF stuff which is overly complicated, far too heavy and every time I picked it up I hit a 'button' which did something I didn't want or understand - and yes I know you can switch them out - also the issue doubles up with the grip. Do I miss the flip out viewfinder. No. Do I miss the tilting viewfinder? No. Do I miss the 'fujifilm film emulations'? No. This thing is beyond exceptional. Flash sync at all speeds outside for my portraiture work - bang on. Pricey lenses? You bet. So I stick with one. And it is exceptional. Phocus software. Works fine. seamless matching with my Broncolor Move 1200L's? Of course. You never regret paying for quality.
Great work from your balcony I hope you and your family are all staying safe and healthy. Excellent job on this video considering all the constraints of being in a stay-at-home order
It seems a great lens. I used a Sony 35/2.8 on the first A7R for some years and always loved it. So I totally get the idea of a superb albeit slow 45/4 on the Hasselblad ...
How would you rate or compare this camera to the newest Pro Canon and or Nikon? Is this HASS a professional quality camera? Not consumer quality, is it a Professional rig?
AND Fuji had their GF 50mm f3.5 lens (for GFX cameras) on sale for $500 recently for quite awhile, but it’s now back up to $1000 as well. These are the “pancake” lenses for these size cameras.
Fuji GFX 50R is a completely different (and very nice) camera, bigger, with a curtain shutter with low flash sync speed (1/125s)... The X1D is more compact, has a leaf shutter with up to 1/2000s flash sync, this shutter is vibration free so the camera doesn't need stabilisation in low light, is part of a fully Hasselblad integrated system, with H System macro and tilt-shift compatibility, X907x digital back compatibility with all V System vintage film cameras, etc...
Fuji had their GF 50mm f3.5 lens (for GFX cameras) on sale for $500 recently for quite awhile, but it’s now back up to $1000 as well. These are the “pancake” lenses for these size cameras.
I’m a big fan of squarer sensors, ideally they’d be circles but that’s a waste of silicon. At the moment I want someone to make a full frame camera with the same width as normal FF, but a bit taller, for a 3:4 aspect ratio, it would be better for portrait and square aspect ratios which are more and more important these days. There would be a bit more vignetting but I don’t care. You could still use all the existing FF glass.
Don't know where the Minolta idea came from. I have a moon landing slide set from 1969 put out by Zeiss, saying it was their lenses. And Hasselblad also says Zeiss. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html
The only Minolta part ever on Hasselblad cameras is the Acute Matte viewfinder screen on late Hasselblad V System cameras, but these screens came way after Apollo missions. All V system lenses comme from Zeiss or Schneider for the zoom. Hasselblad cameras used on the moon were quite different of cameras used in the spaceship. Moon cameras were not SLR's (no mirror and viewfinder) and had a special fixed lens Zeiss Biogon 60mm that was not available for the SLR version.
My first input was based on long time ago infos from a Hasselblad dealer, but according to Nasa's webside, there was a Minolta build camera with the first mission: # When John Glenn became the first American in orbit, bringing a camera was an afterthought. An Ansco Autoset 35mm camera, manufactured by Minolta, was purchased in a local drug store and hastily modified so the astronaut could use it more easily while in his pressure suit. At the time, everything that John Glenn did was deemed an experiment. At the beginning of the program, no one knew for certain whether weightlessness would prevent a man from seeing, or from breathing, or from eating and swallowing. Photography was deemed nothing more than a recreational extra. #
The European photo brand that worked a lot with Minolta was Leica. Leica R3 and R4 were built with a Minolta SLR chassis, all Leica R zooms and the fisheye were Minolta Rokkors, Minolta CLE camera was an evolution of the Leica CL.
You startet out very good with saying that this is not medium format. I’m sure that this, Fujifilm GFX and other systems have great images quality but something is wrong in the industry. From start people wanted to use the measuring from the old film camera and use it to digital camera sensors. That means that full frame are 24x36. If I came and said that my Fujifilm XPro2 is af full frame camera, somebody will laugh and more people will think I’m crazy. But today the photo industry can without anything just put out camera that have bigger than full frame sensor and call all Medium format. Why do all your influencers just let them do that. Medium format starts at 6x4.5 . I even think to remember one off Fujifilm first press meeting about the first GFX. They called it at SuperFull Frame, and that’s what it is. So when a digital camera will have a 6x4.5 sensor will it then be called a full frame medium format camera ? That’s so ridiculous. Go in to the fight please. And thanks for your video 🙏
The problem with "SuperFull Frame" is that at some point, people decided that "super" should mean "smaller than" (super 35 vs 35mm, super 16 vs 16mm, etc), so then you'd get people who assume "Super Full Frame" is smaller than full frame.
kscarlett I don’t care what the name is. Could be another, but not medium format because that’s not true. The stuff you are talking about are not from still photography camera world
@@johnnyszumlanski6882 But clearly, you don't have the historical background for what people were calling medium format. For the past 80 years or so, MF was actually applied to anything roll-film that was larger than 35mm and smaller than sheet film but even within this, there is some flexibility. There is 5" rollfilm (aero), and that wasn't considered MF. There is also 2-1/4x3-1/4 sheet film, and that generally wasn't considered MF either. Basically, stop being so pedantic.
@@mjmdiver1137 but it is really funny how 44x33 become MEDIUM FORMAT when in true photography even 645 is just semi-format, true MF is 6x7. But it's all not about naming, it's about stupidity of consumers nowadays. Just point a finger, say it loud and people will buy it.
@@YanKuzik Not true at all. MF was any roll film larger than 35mm. 645 qualified. 6x7 qualifies. There were many other formats in the past, but they basically all fell away in favor of the 120/220 film rolls since about the late 1960's. I recommend you look at this site for more information: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_format
MC Rist , 45mm focal length on that sensor (identical one in GFX50S and GFX50R) is x 0.78 on FF. So it’s a nifty thirtyfivey 🤪 enlargement crop equivalent. Besides: I am not native English speaker, can someone help me: what os the opposite of crop?
@@rolandrickphotography i think crop can be used both ways, just to clairify i was tryig to say that the lens does not look or seem like (loud autofocus, and relatively cheap looking outside) a 1000$ Lens. The "normal" xcd lenses seem much more suitable for a system like that
@@mcrist139 I’ve just been kidding - at least I tried... 😄 - I hope you didn't get me wrong, never wanted to offend you and also just communicate the factor GFX50/D1X ➡️ Full Frame. However, thanks for the hint crop can used "asynchronous" (me: IT nerd)
Dunno, you can get the quality with some of the old 120 roll film cameras, as I can tell from my negative scans (to FF digital on a light box). The worst thing about the old cameras is that some manufacturers had linkages which meant the lens board was not rigid or in the right place.
nice video man. what you do realize that for that same price you can get a full medium frame with a Fuji experience right? sure it's a Hasselblad but considering how much I've bodies leaves to desire Fuji to give you a more full experience.
I'd way rather have the GFXr or GFXs, but the GFXr is on sale and it's AF is better than Hassleblad's AF. Plus Fuji is just better made in my opinion too and better weather sealed, I don't like the battery on this camera here in the video, seems like a weak spot and it's on the bottom of the camera.
But ... realistically, why would you buy this camera ... ? The slow auto focus would be a nightmare for anything other than studio (compared to most half decent dslr's or mirrorless) and if you're a photographer shooting portraits in a studio (perhaps the only thing this would be decent at) and for some reason you HAVE to have the larger sensor you're either going to have full frame 35mm's in your kit or if you've got the budget hire in something like a Phase One??? Or am I missing something?
No, mate. A USED X1D is 2k. You're saying that is cheaper than a new Leica M body... well, of course. X1D came out 2 years ago. Cheapest M lens new is 50mm 2.4 1,450GBP XCD 45p 1,030GBP Not exactly a world a way from one another. You can easily get a used SL for 2k, there's even one on the overpriced Leica website.
How many photographers are really going to miss out on a gig if they're not shooting with medium format though? The majority of photogigs these days are for folks to chuck the pics up on their instagram, not on billboards. Although, who doesnt love cool new tech.
Yeah I'm too poor for that, for medium format I still shoot film on either my Mamiya RB67 Pro SD or Pentax 67. I enjoy shooting and working with developing film negatives so the extra process doesn't bother me. That and I don't make anywhere near enough money outside of my hobby stuff to justify more than a basic dslr or mirrorless (I have a Pentax Q7 for a pocket camera and a Olympus M10 mkii for the IBIS, between the two I mostly adapt all vintage glass).
Oh, so 44x33 is medium format now? For everyone who forget - the smallest MF (semi-format) 645 is ~56x42 and calling dis "little bigger than FF" camera medium format kinda strange.
The only reason to get this instead of some Fujifilm medium format camera is if you intend to do a lot of outdoor flash due to the leaf shutter. If you can afford to spend a little bit more go for Fujifilm GFX 100S, which will give you a full 16 bit RAW, Good autofocus speed and IBIS. Fujifilm also works with Capture One Pro that is a lot more pleasant to use than the Hasselblad phocus. Well, I give Hasselblad that they have a very good user interface design, but that's it
3:14 wow great shot
lok: cheapest value fujifilm
kai: hasselblaad!
hryorule , who is lok? - Ah, just got it by coincidence 5 minutes later. 😂
I need to convince myself that I don't need jumping into medium format
That's easy for me. Just take a look at the account balance.
You can go film medium format 😉
Just buy a Mamiya 645 with that juicy 80mm f/1.9 and you're good to go
Cell phone cam
Hasselblad 500c/m film. You could get a setup for under 1000$ and get insane pictures
Kai: Buy this camera!
Coronavirus: *_Jobloss and Recession_*
I can buy the lens with my stimulus check 😁😁
@@taylor1038 I'm buying a folding electric bike with mine.
Health and happiness to you, too! You said it. The minute I heard about that lens, I pre-ordered it, and a used X1D II body from B&H. It has become my favorite camera to carry around for almost anything. (Especially things that don't move really fast.) Thank you, and take care!
Damn.. reading the title, why do i thought theres a cheaper version of the hass x1d? Lol
i was thinking that too actually.. T_T
I thought the same thing too!
@@inmy30s we all got bamboozled
Bruv, you are not alone.
Lol same here
Thank you Kai for making me smile over my morning cup of tea.
'P' stands for 'Portable' not pancake. I P/X'd GFX50s for this exact thing and it is utterly joyous - far better then the GF stuff which is overly complicated, far too heavy and every time I picked it up I hit a 'button' which did something I didn't want or understand - and yes I know you can switch them out - also the issue doubles up with the grip. Do I miss the flip out viewfinder. No. Do I miss the tilting viewfinder? No. Do I miss the 'fujifilm film emulations'? No. This thing is beyond exceptional. Flash sync at all speeds outside for my portraiture work - bang on. Pricey lenses? You bet. So I stick with one. And it is exceptional. Phocus software. Works fine. seamless matching with my Broncolor Move 1200L's? Of course. You never regret paying for quality.
This might be the best comment I’ve come across watching videos of this camera. Just what I needed to hear to go ahead and buy it. Thanks man.
Fujifilm GFX100 is amazing on AF. You should give it a try :)
Great work from your balcony I hope you and your family are all staying safe and healthy. Excellent job on this video considering all the constraints of being in a stay-at-home order
That sound and speed of the focus takes me back to the nostalgic days of shooting the XF27 on the X-E2s.
XCD is so sick! Been pricing out used mark 1’s. Love those gorgeous skin tones and highlight recovery.
Not gonna lie, this camera looks like a hassel to use...
Aha ha HAAAA
init blad
😆
Hopefully some day there will be affordable real medium format digital cameras and not this pseudo medium format.
I finally caught one of your videos on the same day it was uploaded!
It seems a great lens. I used a Sony 35/2.8 on the first A7R for some years and always loved it. So I totally get the idea of a superb albeit slow 45/4 on the Hasselblad ...
possibly the best description of bokeh ever hahaha
Wait til you see the X1D coupled with the old Hasselblad V lenses. It is STUNNING!
Glad to see you're still alive Kai. #coronapocalypse
Sorry Kai. Not drinkin’ the Koolaid on this one.
Good to see you doing what you do Kai!
"Wonder how they pronounce Phuket" 😂😂
Enjoying this from my balcony
Thank kai. . You make hasselblaad not cheap again. .
Price go up after this video. . Thank you again kai thankkkkk
I love your sense of humor ahahahah, and of course the reviews 😃
I’d like to play with one but don’t need to buy, that being said 3k really is a decent price if that’s what you want to own
Kai, you are the best. Period.
You accidentaly left that "photo of a camera taken with another camera" blank. At around 3:20.
you sure he is going to put any photo in that blank? Lol
its a photo of polar bears chasing a snowman in the snow
🤣
It was a moment of existentialism
And you know it's not because he missed the shot, you can see them in the iPad section!
Got my stay home order yesterday lol. you stay safe as well man!
That Batman is SICK!
Do you cover your cameras with dust on purpose before you shoot these videos?
How would you rate or compare this camera to the newest Pro Canon and or Nikon? Is this HASS a professional quality camera? Not consumer quality, is it a Professional rig?
Leica q2 battery is the same way.. love this Blad.... thanks Kai!
This is really nice but I’d rather have a GFX 50R.
Just curious, why do you rather want the fuji ?
@@nathanvrvrt cheaper
Nave Art What Francis Albert said + better lens selection
AND Fuji had their GF 50mm f3.5 lens (for GFX cameras) on sale for $500 recently for quite awhile, but it’s now back up to $1000 as well. These are the “pancake” lenses for these size cameras.
Fuji GFX 50R is a completely different (and very nice) camera, bigger, with a curtain shutter with low flash sync speed (1/125s)...
The X1D is more compact, has a leaf shutter with up to 1/2000s flash sync, this shutter is vibration free so the camera doesn't need stabilisation in low light, is part of a fully Hasselblad integrated system, with H System macro and tilt-shift compatibility, X907x digital back compatibility with all V System vintage film cameras, etc...
Fuji had their GF 50mm f3.5 lens (for GFX cameras) on sale for $500 recently for quite awhile, but it’s now back up to $1000 as well. These are the “pancake” lenses for these size cameras.
I’m a big fan of squarer sensors, ideally they’d be circles but that’s a waste of silicon. At the moment I want someone to make a full frame camera with the same width as normal FF, but a bit taller, for a 3:4 aspect ratio, it would be better for portrait and square aspect ratios which are more and more important these days. There would be a bit more vignetting but I don’t care. You could still use all the existing FF glass.
The Hasselblad on the Apollo missions were quipped with Minolta lenses..
Don't know where the Minolta idea came from. I have a moon landing slide set from 1969 put out by Zeiss, saying it was their lenses. And Hasselblad also says Zeiss. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html
The only Minolta part ever on Hasselblad cameras is the Acute Matte viewfinder screen on late Hasselblad V System cameras, but these screens came way after Apollo missions.
All V system lenses comme from Zeiss or Schneider for the zoom.
Hasselblad cameras used on the moon were quite different of cameras used in the spaceship.
Moon cameras were not SLR's (no mirror and viewfinder) and had a special fixed lens Zeiss Biogon 60mm that was not available for the SLR version.
My first input was based on long time ago infos from a Hasselblad dealer, but according to Nasa's webside, there was a Minolta build camera with the first mission: # When John Glenn became the first American in orbit, bringing a camera was an afterthought. An Ansco Autoset 35mm camera, manufactured by Minolta, was purchased in a local drug store and hastily modified so the astronaut could use it more easily while in his pressure suit. At the time, everything that John Glenn did was deemed an experiment. At the beginning of the program, no one knew for certain whether weightlessness would prevent a man from seeing, or from breathing, or from eating and swallowing. Photography was deemed nothing more than a recreational extra. #
The European photo brand that worked a lot with Minolta was Leica. Leica R3 and R4 were built with a Minolta SLR chassis, all Leica R zooms and the fisheye were Minolta Rokkors, Minolta CLE camera was an evolution of the Leica CL.
You startet out very good with saying that this is not medium format. I’m sure that this, Fujifilm GFX and other systems have great images quality but something is wrong in the industry. From start people wanted to use the measuring from the old film camera and use it to digital camera sensors. That means that full frame are 24x36. If I came and said that my Fujifilm XPro2 is af full frame camera, somebody will laugh and more people will think I’m crazy. But today the photo industry can without anything just put out camera that have bigger than full frame sensor and call all Medium format. Why do all your influencers just let them do that. Medium format starts at 6x4.5 . I even think to remember one off Fujifilm first press meeting about the first GFX. They called it at SuperFull Frame, and that’s what it is. So when a digital camera will have a 6x4.5 sensor will it then be called a full frame medium format camera ? That’s so ridiculous. Go in to the fight please. And thanks for your video 🙏
The problem with "SuperFull Frame" is that at some point, people decided that "super" should mean "smaller than" (super 35 vs 35mm, super 16 vs 16mm, etc), so then you'd get people who assume "Super Full Frame" is smaller than full frame.
kscarlett I don’t care what the name is. Could be another, but not medium format because that’s not true. The stuff you are talking about are not from still photography camera world
@@johnnyszumlanski6882 But clearly, you don't have the historical background for what people were calling medium format. For the past 80 years or so, MF was actually applied to anything roll-film that was larger than 35mm and smaller than sheet film but even within this, there is some flexibility.
There is 5" rollfilm (aero), and that wasn't considered MF. There is also 2-1/4x3-1/4 sheet film, and that generally wasn't considered MF either.
Basically, stop being so pedantic.
@@mjmdiver1137 but it is really funny how 44x33 become MEDIUM FORMAT when in true photography even 645 is just semi-format, true MF is 6x7.
But it's all not about naming, it's about stupidity of consumers nowadays. Just point a finger, say it loud and people will buy it.
@@YanKuzik Not true at all. MF was any roll film larger than 35mm. 645 qualified. 6x7 qualifies. There were many other formats in the past, but they basically all fell away in favor of the 120/220 film rolls since about the late 1960's.
I recommend you look at this site for more information:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_format
This is the nifty fifty for hasselblad, exept its 1000 $
MC Rist , 45mm focal length on that sensor (identical one in GFX50S and GFX50R) is x 0.78 on FF. So it’s a nifty thirtyfivey 🤪 enlargement crop equivalent. Besides: I am not native English speaker, can someone help me: what os the opposite of crop?
@@rolandrickphotography i think crop can be used both ways, just to clairify i was tryig to say that the lens does not look or seem like (loud autofocus, and relatively cheap looking outside) a 1000$ Lens. The "normal" xcd lenses seem much more suitable for a system like that
@@mcrist139 I’ve just been kidding - at least I tried... 😄 - I hope you didn't get me wrong, never wanted to offend you and also just communicate the factor GFX50/D1X ➡️ Full Frame. However, thanks for the hint crop can used "asynchronous" (me: IT nerd)
Dunno, you can get the quality with some of the old 120 roll film cameras, as I can tell from my negative scans (to FF digital on a light box). The worst thing about the old cameras is that some manufacturers had linkages which meant the lens board was not rigid or in the right place.
Wow, I like this guy.
It's my first watching video on your channel.
Kai!
Can you please tell me what you are wearing? I like it, it looks really good on you.
Thank you for saying that it's not FF. FINALLY!!!
Awesome vid out there! May you share your indoor gear setup in upcoming vlogs?
Title is accurate. Leica SL2 $5995 USD, Hasselblad X1D2 $5750. Leica 47MP, X1D2 50MP. Question is, does (pixel) size matter?
I’ve ordered one for my X1D and I own the original 45mm. Looking forward to taking some weight out the system for more handheld work.
50mm f1.8 for medium format?
Hi Kai any thoughts how this combination compares to the Fujifilm GFX 50R with the GF50mmF3.5 lens. Creative greetings Alain
Thanks is Kai, keeping the CV blues away.
Nice, and surprisingly relatively affordable 👍😊
Hasselblad reminds me of Leica in a way. Kind of like jewelry that also takes photos.
make sure to clean the sensor and get that hair out of the lens! LOL
It's a minor quibble...but I can't stand lenses where focusing/zooming causes the lens element to protrude beyond the front barrel...
How about video side ? 😀
Kai, I think we need and iPad Pro video. What’s a reasonable workflow?
That sound of focusing reminds my first EOS 1000D and the fucking kit lens that came up with it. Probably a year 2008 or so.
Please continue to expand on your cheesy bokeh analogies. Then submit as ISO for recognition as an official standard.
nice video man. what you do realize that for that same price you can get a full medium frame with a Fuji experience right? sure it's a Hasselblad but considering how much I've bodies leaves to desire Fuji to give you a more full experience.
I thought DJI owned Hasselblad? Good video
Pretty sure they do
Yes and Volkswagen owns Bugatti. Every manufactures are owned by giant groups. They need financial support
Compare this to the GFX50r. It's not even close. The GFX system kills this thing in every way except that sexy design. Can't deny that.
~£3K for a Hassel with a lens? For this money i would still go for a second hand Leica M 240 plus a brand new Zeiss Sonnar 1.5/50.
I really like Leicas and Hasselblads but what would convince you to buy an M 240?
but gfx 50r still really better choise, no?
$1100 US. Not THAT bad considering I’m about to buy the Tamron 35 1.4 for $900, which is full frame.
how does it compare to the fuji medium format cameras? I know the fuji 50R was pretty popular for being less than $5,000.
You push it in for it to come out
makes sense right?
I'd way rather have the GFXr or GFXs, but the GFXr is on sale and it's AF is better than Hassleblad's AF. Plus Fuji is just better made in my opinion too and better weather sealed, I don't like the battery on this camera here in the video, seems like a weak spot and it's on the bottom of the camera.
But ... realistically, why would you buy this camera ... ?
The slow auto focus would be a nightmare for anything other than studio (compared to most half decent dslr's or mirrorless) and if you're a photographer shooting portraits in a studio (perhaps the only thing this would be decent at) and for some reason you HAVE to have the larger sensor you're either going to have full frame 35mm's in your kit or if you've got the budget hire in something like a Phase One???
Or am I missing something?
Damn all glory in pixels 😋😋😋
That price point is very interesting. Medium format Body AND Lens for almost half the cost of a Leica full-frame body only?
I'd still take a leica
Second hand Leicas do exist too :)
@@saifeldeennoreldeen9252 why?
No, mate. A USED X1D is 2k. You're saying that is cheaper than a new Leica M body... well, of course. X1D came out 2 years ago.
Cheapest M lens new is 50mm 2.4 1,450GBP
XCD 45p 1,030GBP
Not exactly a world a way from one another. You can easily get a used SL for 2k, there's even one on the overpriced Leica website.
@@rebeccawarren2976 @RuyLopezQB6 The used market is completely arbitrary and misses the point entirely. Kai is talking about prices when new.
thank you dear neighbour. You're near me, I can almost wave at you :D Thank you
Fuji GF50R or Hasselblad?
Nice watch Kai. I love mine ;)
I don't get it, how come it's a medium format camera if the sensor is bigger than a D850... (confused)
45mm equivalent, you must mean 35 compared to "fullframe" 35x24mm ,right !?
the dust on the sensor triggered me to much :D
All of his videos have cameras totally covered in dust
Dust everywhere Shouldn't you clean it before making such a vid? What about fingers.. Yak.
*too* much
Which price for this camera...?
Sorry I'm late to the party. Foldable sensors! I'm calling it! Mark my words! They'll stick out on top like a poppy uppy flash!
Gah! That hair on the mount at 3:03!
How many photographers are really going to miss out on a gig if they're not shooting with medium format though? The majority of photogigs these days are for folks to chuck the pics up on their instagram, not on billboards. Although, who doesnt love cool new tech.
Wait...was that a 5 o'clock shadow on Kai????
Yeah I'm too poor for that, for medium format I still shoot film on either my Mamiya RB67 Pro SD or Pentax 67. I enjoy shooting and working with developing film negatives so the extra process doesn't bother me. That and I don't make anywhere near enough money outside of my hobby stuff to justify more than a basic dslr or mirrorless (I have a Pentax Q7 for a pocket camera and a Olympus M10 mkii for the IBIS, between the two I mostly adapt all vintage glass).
Oh, so 44x33 is medium format now? For everyone who forget - the smallest MF (semi-format) 645 is ~56x42 and calling dis "little bigger than FF" camera medium format kinda strange.
Geeeeez someone release 6x7 digital already
That lens is basically the medium format version of Canon's 24mm f2.8 pancake, except it costs $1,000 more.
Maybe the Fuji GFX medium format system is a more future-proof purchase.
But the gfx100 is 10k dollars :(
D Dl , not a fair comparison. Consider a GFX50, and used. He said to buy the Hassey body used.
This will be my everyday carry over my Leica M Monochrom
The final days of humanity ....and all I want is this Hasselblad!
Yeah right, the First camera on the moon,... But the first camera in space was the Minolta Hi-Matic from John Glenn 👍
Great video. Count on the Swedes to make 'out of the box' brilliant things.
My broke ass thought there is a medium format camera around 2-3k$ smh
They Caged Non from Hasselblad*
A used Pentax 645D is arround that price
Still glass costs a fortune. Sure, medium format is nice. but is it reaaaaaly what you need?
The "need" argument went out the window with digital cameras ten years ago.
Kai!! Lotion!! Your hands!
Stay healthy and safe everyone
When will Kai age?
The only reason to get this instead of some Fujifilm medium format camera is if you intend to do a lot of outdoor flash due to the leaf shutter. If you can afford to spend a little bit more go for Fujifilm GFX 100S, which will give you a full 16 bit RAW, Good autofocus speed and IBIS. Fujifilm also works with Capture One Pro that is a lot more pleasant to use than the Hasselblad phocus. Well, I give Hasselblad that they have a very good user interface design, but that's it
Hello my man thanks for the information!!!
LoL! Meanwhile, in the world 99% of us live in, Canon announced the T8i and literally nobody is talking about it.
Missing photo in 3:15 😅 but love the video
Sergio Cuen I think he did it on purpose maybe lol
The colors are mazing
What does anyone think about the fact the nikon Z mount can accommodate one of these larger sensors.
Nikon going for a larger format in the future?
Not sure you were correct about the pigeons though