What the Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron deference means to you
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- Read the transcript here: federalnewsnetwork.com/manage...
The Supreme Court last week overturned a 40 year precedent. In a case brought by New England fisherman, the court reversed what's been know as Chevron deference. In the 1984 case, the courts said judges should generally defer to federal agencies when rules they make are reasonable, and the enabling law was ambiguous. Last week's decision reverses that thinking. For what this may mean for agency rulemaking operations, the Federal Drive with Tom Temin turned to the chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States, Andy Fois. 
Наука
Unelected agencies empowering,& imposing fines, is unconstitutional.
It was legalized extortion it took forty years to get it done.
It means deprivation of rights under color of law comes to an end after forty long unconstitutional years.
Hopefully this brings the price of all fish down a bit, not just herring.
This is a great decision! If an agency's leaders believe the agency needs additional authority, beyond that prescribed in existing law, the correct approach is for the agency to draft legislation providing for that, and send the draft to Congress along with a request for it to be passed.
This is a good thing removing the Chevron Deference.
These courts have been able to turn purple into green for far to long.
How about the wind farm in the ocean.that make no sense
So, not at all worried about our water-ways being poisoned from fracking/chemicals, not concerned about regulations and standards for what’s deemed safe? You’re saying it’s good to not defer to a separate panel filled with experts when we do have ambiguous laws that ultimately affect our lives. So if your land becomes contaminated, you do not want to have a higher governing body to ensure companies like BP and Exxon do not skimp on regulations? Meaning, because the court says so, that’s it? No more oversight?
I’m confused why people see this as a good thing. Power? Supreme Court justices just granted more power to the president recently. You can trust that they’ll do the same for the people?
this is an incredibly underrated comment and spot on
You fail to comprehend just how brain damaged the Trump cult is
I hear you but respectively disagree ......the Congress needs to get off their butts and create common sense laws that will protect us......a 3 or 4 letter agency does NOT have the best interests of the people of this country, those 3 or 4 letter agencies only do what whatever the ruling parties want
@@sshomesteaders1776
A. You sound like a Fox "news" junkie
B. Do you trust Marjorie "The Hillbilly" Taylor Greene and Lauren "The prostitute" Boebert to create quality laws?
Oh yeah full of experts my arse, How old are you and have you ever had to deal with bureaucrats? Well I have, If you think for one minute our world is going to be polluted because YOUR so called experts can't create laws/impose nasty arse fines then you need to move to europe. Who is the best expert for interpreting law? Fricken judges DUH!!!! not your so called experts, They need to get a law passed do it the same way the PEOPLE do, through congress. Jeebus you people think were gonna turn into china.
The first nature of business is to feather your own nest.
Ignorance must be bliss huh buddy? 1984 is when chevron came into being They took the power from the "Judicial" and gave it to the "executive" branch, They just now figured out this craps unconstitutional so they took it back. You need a brain.