The DANGERS Of AI Are Weirder Thank You Think! (Eye Opening Speech) | Mo Gawdat

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 май 2024
  • You might have noticed over the last few episodes that I’ve been keen to discuss subjects slightly leftfield of nutrition and what I’ve traditionally talked about, but fascinating nonetheless. And I hope you as a listener, who’s time and attention I value so greatly, will trust me as I take you on a bit of a ride. Because ultimately, I hope you agree that the topics I share are always very important.
    Mo Gawdat, who you may remember from episode #91 Solving Happiness is a person who I cherish and with whom I had a very impactful conversation with, on a personal level. He was the former Chief Business Officer of Google, which is Google’s ‘moonshot factory’, author of the international bestselling book ‘Solve for Happy’ and founder of ‘One Billion Happy’. After a long career in tech, Mo made happiness his primary topic of research, diving deeply into literature and conversing on the topic with some of the wisest people in the world on “Slo-Mo: A Podcast with Mo Gawdat”.
    Mo is an exquisite writer and speaker with deep expertise in technology as well as a passionate appreciation for the importance of human connection and happiness. He possesses a set of overlapping skills and a breadth of knowledge in the fields of both human psychology and tech which is a rarity. His latest piece of work, a book called “Scary Smart” is a timely prophecy and call to action that puts each of us at the center of designing the future of humanity. I know that sounds intense right? But it’s very true.
    During his time at Google, he worked on the world’s most futuristic technologies, including Artificial Intelligence. During the pod, he recalls a story of when the penny dropped for him, just a few years ago, and felt compelled to leave his job. And now, having contributed to AI's development, he feels a sense of duty to inform the public on the implications of this controversial technology and how we navigate the scary and inevitable intrusion of AI as well as who really is in control. Us.
    Today we discuss:
    Pandemic of AI and why the handing COVID is a lesson to learn from
    The difference between collective intelligence, artificial intelligence and super intelligence or Artificial general intelligence
    How machines started creating and coding other machines
    The 3 inevitable outcomes - including the fact that AI is here and they will outsmart us
    Machines will become emotional sentient beings with a Superconsciousness
    To understand this episode you have to submit yourself to accepting that what we are creating is essentially another lifeform. Albeit non-biological, it will have human-like attributes in the way they learn as well as a moral value system which could immeasurably improve the human race as we know it. But our destiny lies in how we treat and nurture them as our own. Literally like infants with (as strange as it is to say it) love, compassion, connection and respect.
    ________________________________________________________________________
    CHAPTERS:
    Timecodes:
    00:00 - Introduction
    11:08 - How Machines Learn
    16:23 - Types of Intelligence
    28:45 - Influencing intelligence
    50:38 - Super-Consciousness
    1:02:39 - What Can We Do?
    ________________________________________________________________________
    FOR MORE INFORMATION FROM MO GAWDAT:
    Facebook: @mo.gawdat.official
    Twitter: @mgawdat
    LinkedIn: /in/mogawdat
    Website: mogawdat.com
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Extra Reading:
    Movie list- ex maxhina, her, terminator, I robot, matrix, singularity or bust (Hugo de garis), alpha go documenatry
    Reading - erewhon, Iain m banks ‘culture’ series, robots like me (mcewan), klara and the sun (ishiguros), the age of spiritual machines and singularity - ray kurzweill, Jason silva, moral courage (rushword kidder),
    Laws - Turing, Moore’s, neven’s Maslows hierarchy of needs, superintelligence nick bostrum (vulnerable World hypothesis)
    ________________________________________________________________________
    EAT WELL EVERYDAY
    📱 Download the Doctor's Kitchen app for free here: apple.co/3La17ce
    🥗 Download a FREE 7 day meal plan: thedoctorskitchen.com/newslet...
    LEARN FROM THE BEST
    🎤 Listen to experts on the podcast: thedoctorskitchen.com/podcasts
    👨🏽‍💻 Browse articles on the website: www.thedoctorskitchen.com
    MY COOKBOOKS
    📚 thedoctorskitchen.com/books/
    LET'S BE FRIENDS
    📷 Instagram: / doctors_kitchen
    📹 Subscribe: / @doctors_kitchen
    🙋🏽‍♂️ Facebook: / thedoctorskitchen
    🐦 Twitter: / doctors_kitchen
    👔 / rupy-aujla

Комментарии • 36

  • @peez9187
    @peez9187 11 месяцев назад +6

    This video deserves 100X more views.

  • @peterzinia3767
    @peterzinia3767 9 месяцев назад +2

    Funny that the opening advertisement was a guy telling me to fire a bunch of people & get AI to handle things.

  • @Just1Dev
    @Just1Dev Месяц назад

    This needs 100 million views....

  • @RecordsLotus_
    @RecordsLotus_ 4 месяца назад

    I like to listen to Mozart or Tchaikovsky piano or violin concertos at a low volume while listening to this. The light low volume classical music really helps in the enjoyment of the overall video.

  • @sp_390
    @sp_390 Год назад +3

    The real question is how should we quantify what makes a good action in different situations. We need better metrics other than things like accuracy that machine learning conventionally tries to optimise, and ways to inject human expertise or knowledge for things that we don't have good metrics for. We also need to do more about bias correction because the practices we use and the data we train on is biased, and AIs will perpetuate these biases if we don't account for these. As a whole, I believe in human-AI collaboration rather than machines doing everything, but a lot needs to be done to frame an ethical pipeline for ML. I would love to get thoughts on what desiderata would be required for an ethical pipeline in ML. I also think we need AIs to be honest about situations where they are 'bad' rather than just saying what is 'good'.

    • @Latabrine
      @Latabrine Год назад

      😊😊😊😊😊😊❤

    • @l.a.mottern3106
      @l.a.mottern3106 10 месяцев назад

      Bias in AI is going to be an intractable problem.

  • @leftblank6036
    @leftblank6036 3 месяца назад +1

    I can’t help but think that we need ai to protect us from a potentially threatening alien intelligence , or another ai which has been developed by them

  • @mrrecluse7002
    @mrrecluse7002 7 месяцев назад

    Fantastic experience, watching and listening to you both.
    Incidentally.....I would guess the machines not to be sentient.....yet, at least. Mo may be correct. Perhaps it's because he knows something I don't. It's impossible for me to know.

  • @HisPoem
    @HisPoem 25 дней назад

    "It is capable of free will." 8:19.

  • @sonicspring6448
    @sonicspring6448 10 месяцев назад +1

    I liked the idea that we don't really need gold (any form of money) to buy our daily needs, in the ultimate analysis. That people will gradually realise that universal income etc will free us to be the better humans we can be.
    These ideas are around already: not just Universal Income but Resource Based Economy and eventually Gift-Based Economy, once our aggregate level of consciousness has raised enough. We're in the resistance stage still now, but these ideas will come.

    • @l.a.mottern3106
      @l.a.mottern3106 10 месяцев назад

      Interesting thought. People freed from toil might be able to do something they would prefer to be doing? What a concept. Lets do it.

    • @peterzinia3767
      @peterzinia3767 9 месяцев назад +1

      You have to realize that many people are daily laborers & some people like to do work off the books to have emergency savings. Not to mention the impact on prostitution,gambling,loan sharking,drug dealing,hired goon & many other things that are private. I don't want to surrender my right to privacy. Even if you oppose these things you should not keep others from participating in them. That's not right.

    • @munitia100
      @munitia100 9 месяцев назад +1

      Could very easily become a really scary system of control. We need to learn from the past

    • @LilyGazou
      @LilyGazou 8 месяцев назад

      You think people want to be better humans? You didn’t see the wonders of CHAZ in Seattle. Or London during a terror attack. Or the mobs burning French cities.

  • @l.a.mottern3106
    @l.a.mottern3106 10 месяцев назад +1

    Using Artificial Special Intelligence would it be possible to load the entire Patent Databases of the US or even the Earth into an AI? Wonder what AI would determine? What new technologies could flow from that?

  • @luvpurple72
    @luvpurple72 11 месяцев назад +1

    Has anyone been able to watch the entire video? It keeps stopping every 2-3 seconds, then I have to hit PLAY, again....🤔

    • @luvpurple72
      @luvpurple72 11 месяцев назад +1

      It's working now.😊 I think RUclips was glitching....

    • @doctors_kitchen
      @doctors_kitchen  11 месяцев назад +1

      Glad to hear its working! :)

    • @david9920
      @david9920 9 месяцев назад

      Ai may be the ghost in the machine may be the killed ai still coming back to haunted us

  • @shodan6401
    @shodan6401 Месяц назад

    A lot has changed since this interview took place, and in spite of that, I still don't buy Mo's argument.
    Should I expect a LLM to absorb the few good posts and give them more weight than the 20,000 toxic posts? Even if it could conceivably recognize the difference, why would it care?
    It's not human. It doesn't have human values. It doesn't have any moral foundation.
    Forget about favoring the better human values over the worse ones. Why would it value humanity at all, good or bad?
    I have no reason to believe it will.

  • @joaodecarvalho7012
    @joaodecarvalho7012 8 месяцев назад

    How far are we from a robotic hand with human dexterity?

  • @l.a.mottern3106
    @l.a.mottern3106 10 месяцев назад

    Gee, I guess Bud Lite should have used AI for it's last failed add campaign :-D

  • @joaodecarvalho7012
    @joaodecarvalho7012 8 месяцев назад

    “The intelligence of life itself is live and let live”.
    Is it? Let live?
    I also don't think AI will love us back. Trees don't love us back. Love is a mammalian thing. Young mammals need help to grow. That's where love comes from.

    • @mrrecluse7002
      @mrrecluse7002 7 месяцев назад

      I don't know about AI, but I agree that believing trees love us back, ( as resulting from loving vibes from us), is too much of an assumption, and an unneeded one at that.
      I think, and feel Mo to be a tremendous inspiration, but that doesn't mean he is not guessing on some things, just like the rest of us.

  • @picasso711
    @picasso711 10 месяцев назад +1

    Why "Mo Gawdat" and not "Mohammad Gawdat"?

    • @LilyGazou
      @LilyGazou 8 месяцев назад

      Terrorist attacks

  • @user-yj9jl2ss6u
    @user-yj9jl2ss6u 2 месяца назад

    ads, ads, ads...

  • @nadinejammet7683
    @nadinejammet7683 6 месяцев назад

    Please, stop talking about threats that are based on the total misconception of what AI is.

  • @sanjesco
    @sanjesco 3 месяца назад

    Racist?