I really enjoy listening to Helen as she comes across as one of the only sober voices on this issue. I can agree mostly with what both women say about the subject. Mostly, unfortunately because they both suffer from what we all accuse the radical left of being, basically "intersectionalist", if that can be a word. they are interjecting separate causes into the fight. The conversation between the two ladies got very silly indeed when Louise suggested that feminist or feminism movement has always come from conservatives or right wing or whatever the current ridiculous term is. It was obvious also, that Helen didn't support that idea, probably because she is older, and actually knows something about history. Louise probably has an audience and good luck to her. They both are clearly puritanical, fighting a separate cause called, "End weird sex and online pornography", coinciding with "sissy porn" creates trans people", based on anecdotal evidence. People can say whatever they like, show us real evidence. Fighting online porn and pornography in all its forms is perhaps the most childish, naively idiotic concept ever imaginable. By the end of the video it was like listening to two nuns, talking about how sex belongs in missionary positions, between a man and women in a long term marriage or relationship. Good luck ladies!
Helen Joyce is simply a woman who is needed at this time, for her wonderful articulate and thoughtful way she explains and reads this ideology. Every woman and man would benefit hugely from this podcast, irrelevant of views as it gives a informed and evidence unbiased view of women and our needs. Thank you x
@EthententI'm a straight male. I think we're all drawn to the clarity of Helen Joyce's words in this insane world. I only woke up to this insanity a few days ago.
Helen's point about "variant masculinity" and "variant femininity" is just brilliant. This entire conversation is incredibly interesting. Thank you both. :)
It's definitely resonating with me with regards to the hsts vs. AGP distinction, because I must say even with the hsts, e.g. Blaire White, when Blaire is talking/gesturing etc., it does not remind me of a woman at all and I always found that difficult to make sense of. Blaire is much more like a hyper-"effeminate" same-s* attracted male, who though super super hyper-effeminate, is still nothing like any woman I know. The energy is very different. This is such a useful way to think about it. Even the hsts do not "feel" like women, which I know is hurtful to some to say. They feel to me obviously nothing NOTHING like the AGP energy. But it is still a male expression of self, not a woman. When Helen made that point about so-called "sissy" highly gender-stereotype non-conforming little boys - and she says these little boys swishing about and flamboyant are NOT like little girls, that absolutely clicked for me. It's so true. They are still, of course, MALE, they are boys not girls, and it is still a kind of male-ness they are exhibiting, it is just not the common form of masculinity... And ditto for same-s* attracted females. As girls, the tomboy is NOT a boy. She is still exhibiting a self that is female, not male. It is just a less-common, less socially-rewarded part of the range of how females express 'self'. Ugh all this terminology and trying to grapple with the right words to articulate things, it's a language/concept nightmare.
@@L_Martin "less socially rewarded" is such a key term -- you see it and feel that, yet ppl act like it doesn't exist and as if they do not enforce it. On the surface, it makes becoming the "opposite gender" easier than bucking the system.
@@tablescissors Yeah, I'd even say it's not just "not rewarded", it's actively PUNISHED. Which kids get bullied? Definitely the GNC ones. Women have to thread the needle of being just the "right" kind of feminine. If you go too far in one direction you're called stupid and a hoe. If you don't take care of your appearance or you're fat, you get insults of a different kind. For the males, being sissy is the worst thing you can be. That's definitely the message they're still given, even today in the UK it's obvious that sissy boys / effeminate men have to really work put the work in to cultivate attractive personality traits or abilities because if they don't they're treated as worst than worthless. Males who are naturally more stereotypically masculine don't get punished, ditto for females - and obviously looking attractive helps enormously. I think both males and females get punished for being GNC, but in different ways. I agree with you totally - easier to hop the fence, less heartache (or so it seems to kids especially).
Having had a mastectomy for breast cancer I can tell you that it does indeed come with many complications and side effects. I can’t even imagine the devastating consequences of something like phaloplasty😢. Also I have heard trans activists asking to prioritise mastectomies for them as more important than breast cancer patients. It is just awful all of this. Also living with a single mastectomy does not make me half man! 🤪
@Lindy T I’m sorry you’re going through that. Some women have no issues. I have some nerve damage and also shoulder pain. The scar is well healed but very tender and sore a year on. Also I have developed a little lymphoedema, which is probably more of a result of my lymph node clearance, though it can happen with just mastectomy surgery. Wishing you well on your journey. 🙏💙🙏
THANK YOU. "Variant masculinity" and "variant femininity". I completely agree that we have gone backward in accepting human beings as they are. I appreciate your super-sensible voices.
For me nothing has highlighted more clearly how badly women are disregarded, diminished, insulted and undermined by our establishment than the ease with which women rights have been sidelined by the trans lobby. Like Helen I am shocked at how fragile women's rights have proved to be.
Me too. I'm a man, and in my younger days I actually felt as if feminism was just this toxic, bourgeois victim stance when hearing about silly things like "mansplaining", "manspreading" etc. Fast forward and here we are. Women's spaces invaded, sports destroyed, male rapists getting transferred to female prisons, teen girls body parts taken off... It's so disheartening.
@@vladimir.putinn_007 what do you mean hurting men and boys. Men and boys needed to change as much as women did but too many of them wanted to maintain an undeserved superior status. Grow up and learn something for the sake of young boys.
I have watched many interviews with Helen on this issue because she is so easy and intellectually invigorating to listen to. There is overlap, but different questions result in new insights every time. Thanks for this conversation, it was absolutely brilliant.
38:45 Helen articulates something important that I've thought about but was unable to quite realize and frame. She offers a cogent explanation for why we're being coerced into having a "correct attitude" that is atypical of most liberation or rights movements. If I want the right to, say, use a currently proscribed recreational drug, I don't need you to share in my enthusiasm or approval of the activity in order to enjoy that right, should it be attained. Great discussion, thanks.
This is episode is just SO good. I’ve listened to it 3 times now. I think it’s my favourite discussion that Louise has done in this series so far. I’m going to buy Helen’s book now.
Please continue speaking truth to power. Helen and Louise are so sensible and honest. Real women would never be so arrogant and stupid as to say the things that trans ‘women’ spew regularly. I am reminded of the man who told JK Rowling that he is more woman than she will ever be.
Thank you. As someone who was previously rad fem leaning, I've tried getting across the points about the similarity between gender ideology and rad fem ideology in terms of having trouble facing reality. To no avail. So many RF don't wanna hear it. But It's time to stop pretending biology doesn't largely influence the differences between men and women and, as women, we get informed because we are the ones who suffer most for being out of the loop.
Agreed! And it's lonely, as a millennial I'll just say, the older GC women are very resistant to acknowledging how much biology shapes females deeply (in terms of our preferences, our personalities, etc.), and the young "intersectional feminists" are all naturally brain-poisoned on gender identity theory where biology means nothing and it's all just social constructs and there is nothing stable and everything that looks stable is just an illusion. It's very tricky though to walk that line and say "Biology, if you are male or female, matters SO MUCH and is so fundamental - but that does not mean women belong in the kitchen". It's like I feel there is nowhere for feminism to go after acknowledging how much biology dictates the female experience (beyond just "we bear the children" and "society expects x of us", but actually owning up to this thing of agreeableness and all the rest of it) I think we are all terrified of the mentality of men like Matt Walsh, and other religious ideologies, pouncing on this and trying to force women and men back into rigid roles, and calling a woman dysfunctional/defective or something if her life doesn't revolve around having kids and housekeeping.
I have had to repeatedly justify to Caucasian, White women that there are distinct differences in the statistics of crime and the psychology motivating the genders. Like it or not, it doesn't care about your ideology and it exists.
@@jujutrini8412 Radical feminism. Type of feminism which conceptualises patriarchy as oppression of all women by all men. It lacks nuance and dismisses individuality.
I've actually found the opposite with rad fem online spaces, they often understand male violence against women as inevitable and a biological feature of all men. In online spaces sex essentialism was very strong. But my main gripe with radical feminism is the idea that all men are oppressive to all women. Just reminds me of Critical Race Theory nonsense. Any ideology trying to convince me that a person's character and behaviour will be based on their physical characteristics is not something I'm willing to subscribe to.
This whole interview was great. I've read Helen Joyce's book. It is a must read! I will say about the last 10 minutes of this interview was axis shifting for me. I am neither a feminist nor antifeminist but I what is a raised around left to far left in America and about the last 10 min conversation in this interview goes so far beyond anything I would ever encounter. I'm subscribing to this channel!
In years to come our descendants will wonder how anyone could believe being in the wrong body was a possibility and the horrific scandal of mutilating children and young adults that followed.
Love the description of variant femininity and variant masculinity. As a lesbian who fancies masculine women I've had to explain to multiple people why I date manly women if I like females. Because there's an undeniable and irresistible femaleness to masculine women that is nothing like men have.
I have always found androgynous people sexy, so do many, but I don't find pretenders interesting...that is no longer the blending of energies, that is one thing fully posing as another.
you two both encourage me so much to speak my mind more often in my everyday life. not just when it comes to these topics. I am glad you exist. I rarely had female rolemodels, my mother has too much internalised misogyny, she only made my life harder as a teen. now, in my early 30s I feel more confident than I have ever been and thanks to you I now have the words to voice so many things that have been bothering me. thank you!!
This was awesome hahaha, thanks. I first saw you on Modern Wisdom, read your book in one plane flight, and when you mentioned this on your Jordan Peterson interview I instantly subscribed. I do hope the trans movement loses steam, soon, but I am worried. Frankly, though, I'm beginning to wonder whether "right" and "left" as descriptors might be antiquated. There are some pretty strange alliances forming if we think in those terms.
Thank you so much for this podcast. For some time I've been very vocal about the fact that I'm "not a feminist" because I just feel that those who use the term are drifting so far from real women's issues and attempting to slay and/or invent such tiny and insignificant dragons... and im totally bored by how most people just regurgitate sound bites from the left that dont actually mean anything. the last part of this discussion is the only thing I've heard I think ever that might convince me that there is still use for the term. I'd be so interested in more conversations around the maiden/mother/matriarch triad, especially diving into motherhood and mothers issues. Looking forward to more thought provoking conversations.
Thank you Louise and Helen for sharing this discussion. It's superb in content and style - important, courageous yet measured, and as kind and empathetic as it could be. At bedrock, and with two young daughters who are growing up fast, I really appreciate the commitment to an axiom that there is objective reality with facts that can be known. Accepting that, we can then face honestly the positive and negative consequences. That seems to me the only sound basis for discussion, and thank you for anchoring in such terms .
Really interesting interview! This was my introduction to Helen and I will definitely buy her book. The idea that women's innate kindess (or desire to help the weak, however you want to put it) leads them to support the trans movement is reminiscent of the recent controversy over drag queens performing in front of children. These events are being attended by young, heterosexual mums, and they are the ones who are supporting it and calling critics of it bigots. They are the ones who are trying to gaslight anyone who dares suggest that it's not appropriate for children. Obviously most women think it's disgusting but I suspect that men ate much less likely to give these "performers" the benefit of the doubt. A male perspective is - these guys are perverts, there's no other reason to do this.
I think you're right--yes, it's the young women brainwashed by the prevailing zeitgeist (though I suspect there's an Emperor's New Clothes element at work here too) who support this grotesquerie. Women of the older generations tend to think the drag queen storytime stuff is deplorable. Young kids shouldn't be exposed to this. (I've never found drag to be amusing. While some of the performers may be talented, I've never bought the justification that, by representing the worst patriarchal stereotypes of women, they're actually parodying them.) It also nauseates me and most of the older women I know to see little kids cavorting at Gay Pride parades along with half-naked men in leather straps. I consider fetishism utterly degrading. Perhaps we should bring back the good old-fashioned notion of "shame." How pathetic to centre your life on bizarre variants of sexual gratification--or even "normal" sexual gratification.
Thanks you folks ! It's really important that these conversations are available to listen to and reflect on, these days. It's so easy to to get lost in amongst the lots of extreme ideas that have suddenly popped up everywhere ! I'm an ordinary middle class male in my 7th decade and depend on people like you to help me pick my way through the modern world...
Fascinating, and I hadn't deeply considered the very biological distinct cycles that a female experiences vs. a spectrum-like biology for males. Some of the cycles within a female's life are as different in needs and societal response as the broad differences between sexes.
The part about the sexualities and the sexes and the different types of masculinity and femininity is highly fascinating! I have observed these things like that in the real world and it is wonderful to hear it confirmed like that!
1:06:15 "Maybe there are seeds within leftist ideology that will always lead us here" After considering myself on the left (because of economic leftism) for a long time, I had this realization as well. The way it came clear to me, is that I thought that you could open the door to leftism and only welcoming in the bits you like and not inviting the rest inside, thereby ending up with an ideal society. It became clear to me in 2016 that, in fact, the left always devolves into its essence. That you can't open the door and keep the wind from blowing in and bringing whatever it likes with it. Once the door is open, anything and everything waiting on the other side can and will come barreling in. That's when I became a conservative.
1. “When you have beliefs that are harmful to human beings, they are more harmful to women and children.” 2. “It’s worse than lying to be kind, it’s lying to be good.” I mean I’m not even 15 minutes in and I’m moved. Louise and Helen, please keep up the amazing work!
I must say that both of you women are among my most admired people in the public sphere....and I don't have that many on my list (only 5 or 6). Thanks for representing women so well!
I was born with club feet and had a series of surgical interventions to straighten my feet and allow me to walk. I live with the cost of that in terms of chronic pain, lack of medical understanding and physical imbalances. The other cost would be somewhat similar so it was a good call. This idea that people can chop off parts of their bodies with no consequences is madness. We are not Mr and Mrs potato heads!
The idea of "variant" femininity / masculinity is gold. First time hearing about it - makes so much sense. Also loved the bit on how autogynephelia is at the core of the gender ideology especially with projecting it onto children. This whole episode was fascinating - thank you so much!!!
Agree 6:08 ! I’ve never been engaged but I’m now hyper aware. I’m furious at what I’ve lost! And I’m winning debates with pro trans people regarding women’s safety. I think men are waking up.
Interesting discussion. Thanks. I don't really agree with the RadFem framing of the trans issue as being primarily one of male vs female, though. Rather it seems to be an issue of men & women on the political Left (most of them ostensibly Feminist) who over the years have adopted certain ways of thinking that have mainstreamed what used to be an extremely fringe and irrelevant subculture. Now the few saner factions of the Left are scrambling to contain a beast of the Left's own making.
Hello Louise, I'm a new subscriber. I found your podcast via your recent interview with Jordan Peterson, but I first saw you on your interview with the Spectator.
I've always wondered about the 10 week stage of the foetus, witch determines what 'sex' we become, that something goes array i.e. too much estrogen/tesestrone???
Men & Women Are different & not just opposites; men do often see (most) women as not quite full people like themselves & women do often see (most) men as not people at all & readily disposable. Patriarchy might oppress with hierarchies Matriarchy might oppress with elimination
43:19 This reminds me of the other day when I was watching a video of Shape Shifter (an HSTS detrans man, for those who don't know) and thinking, "He's feminine, but feminine like a drag queen, not feminine like a woman."
Were the police cowards or just didn't care? CSA and violence/SA against females is unreported and when it is the police don't deal with it, even when they do, it rarely goes to court where victims endure further trauma. The offender rarely get sentenced and if they do they are out of prison in 3 or 4 yrs to keep offending. There's no consequences yet the victims whole life is ruined.😢
I do agree with you (both) in regards to many issues. I do, however, see more problems with feminism than you seem to acknowledge. I'll venture to make a suggestion that probably won't be taken seriously, but I'll make it, anyway. I'll give the names of three women that I offer as possibilities for being brought for a talk: Janice Fiamengo, Karen Straughan or Alison Tieman. Any of them would be able to carry a very nice conversation, I''m sure (from a point of view seldom even recognized). Of the three, Janice is the one with academic credentials, being a former university professor in Canada, if that matters.
37:14 one of the things that paved the way for trans ideology is treating gay men like honorary women and women always appointing themselves to protect them. Helen talks about the previous research that found straight men’s reason for being trans as deviant but gay men just “fit in better as women.” I don’t think that gay men’s intentions should have ever been portrayed so innocently.
I find the point about the healthcare industry making money by not helping people interesting because I have a similar belief about language-learning. Many of the most economically successful apps, platforms and companies have appalling results but hook clients into paying for years to not improve very much at all.
I absolutely loved this interview, especially acknowledging masculine and feminine on different scales, as opposed to going down the route of changing your entire gender based on typical stereotypes of how men and women behave. And the why behind the trans activism makes me so angry. The top of the crop with a nasty fetish, that can’t pass for a women demanding we all play along.
Being critical of this new trans movement is not a left or right issue. It’s a woman’s issue. Feminists on the left have always taken into account economic policy and raising women out of poverty being essential. These two women are being disingenuous. Women caring for their children is not a left or right issue. The reason why we are not heard is that we are poor and don’t have highflying jobs and the media only invites right wing people to air their opinions.
'...and the media only invites right wing people to air their opinions.' The subjective casting of the demarcations of the Left-Right spectrum is just another reason why it's frequently a useless lense to employ. That & the fact that there are two of them, economic & social, which don't always align.
I’m a lesbian in my late 30’s and my whole life I have never cared more been interested in feminism or anything of the like. This whole debate has me actively involved and now giving a damn about what is going on. I’ve learnt more about feminism in the last two years than I have ever known. I honestly don’t even know what type I would call myself but as a gay woman I’m fed up with the bull.
First interview I have seen you do where you both are coming from the same place. Of course that is the norm, conservatives talk to other conservatives and vice versa. What has been interesting for me is hearing what the younger generations obsess about which I haven't focused on enough and I have picked your channel to start on mostly cause I was researching Christian Nationalism and you turned up talking to Allie Beth Stuckey and caught my interest
A saw a picture of I would guess a 15 year old girl. She was standing with her mum or a female family member, she had a very short hair cut and stood there with a beaming smile on her face. You could tell she was in pjs that she had especially picked out for her stay in hospital. Because as she stood there with her cheery family member with her bright yellow t-Rex cartoon pajamas she had just had a double mastectomy and was smiling like she had just won the lottery. I was horrified absolutely horrified and that’s the moment I saw trans ideology for what it was a pernicious toxic cult. Everything I’ve learnt in the last couple of months I don’t know how I didn’t see it before or how I could have missed it. Girls at 15 cutting of perfectly healthy breasts for something they have no way of truly understanding the repercussions of at that age. I hope that girl doesn’t change her mind. It’s barbaric and I can’t believe our politicians and academics are championing this and shutting down any who oppose the be kind or we will make you regret it philosophy. It’s insanity.
I agree with essentially everything that Helen said up until she asserted that women are more complex than men. I understand why she would make the assertion, but I disagree with it. I think much more effort has gone into understanding women's complexities, and men's complexities are largely ignored or not understood. I think this will become ever more apparent in an age where a growing number of men are 'falling behind' their female counterparts in terms of education and job performances, with women wanting a man of equal or greater 'value' in these categories, and a shrinking number of men fitting that description. I think we'll be forced to reassess a position of men or their needs being comparatively simple in the coming decade.
Some of the controversy has arisen from the power of social stereotypes. Masculine vs feminine demonstrated via behavioral styles rather than actual biological differences.
1:16:32 Old women aren't the most disposable people in society; they aren't in almost any society I can think of. When there is no society but instead a situation of raw struggle for survival, then old women may be the most disposable because they are of the least use to everyone else then. Men who are deemed undesirable by women are usually the most disposable group in any society; though in non-sexed terms babies unwanted by their mothers are probably actually the most disposable. In any case, except where externalities supercede, it is Women that usually dictate who as a group is Most Disposable in a Society. Older women have lost value in society because younger women now devalue motherhood, (whilst men's opinion on or value of older women is mostly unchanged); & it seems more of a narcisisstic addiction to the power of female youth that is driving things, certainly not the esteem of men themselves, which more than ever is an instrument for obtaining what a girl wants & measuring her place in the female pecking order. What successful woman cares what a man thinks because he's thinking it, let alone men in general? Only if it's about her.
Very few things make me proud to be British these days, but being a citizen of TERF Island is one of them.
Yes, I'm not a woman but I quite like the fact we're called "TERF Island", leading the fight back against gender ideology.
Canadian Flavor Envy 😅
Just became a full time citizen of TERF island. Just read Helen’s book and begged my 25 yr old daughter to read it too.
I really enjoy listening to Helen as she comes across as one of the only sober voices on this issue.
I can agree mostly with what both women say about the subject. Mostly, unfortunately because they both suffer from what we all accuse the radical left of being, basically "intersectionalist", if that can be a word. they are interjecting separate causes into the fight.
The conversation between the two ladies got very silly indeed when Louise suggested that feminist or feminism movement has always come from conservatives or right wing or whatever the current ridiculous term is.
It was obvious also, that Helen didn't support that idea, probably because she is older, and actually knows something about history.
Louise probably has an audience and good luck to her. They both are clearly puritanical, fighting a separate cause called, "End weird sex and online pornography", coinciding with "sissy porn" creates trans people", based on anecdotal evidence.
People can say whatever they like, show us real evidence. Fighting online porn and pornography in all its forms is perhaps the most childish, naively idiotic concept ever imaginable. By the end of the video it was like listening to two nuns, talking about how sex belongs in missionary positions, between a man and women in a long term marriage or relationship. Good luck ladies!
.
ROTHERHAM PRIDE
.
Helen Joyce is simply a woman who is needed at this time, for her wonderful articulate and thoughtful way she explains and reads this ideology. Every woman and man would benefit hugely from this podcast, irrelevant of views as it gives a informed and evidence unbiased view of women and our needs.
Thank you x
we are very lucky that those who speak up for us are so eloquent
she is amazing
@EthententI'm a straight male. I think we're all drawn to the clarity of Helen Joyce's words in this insane world. I only woke up to this insanity a few days ago.
@@nikobellic570 A few days ago? Welcome to the rabbit hole. This subject takes you everywhere...never-ending thread.
Helen's point about "variant masculinity" and "variant femininity" is just brilliant. This entire conversation is incredibly interesting. Thank you both. :)
It's definitely resonating with me with regards to the hsts vs. AGP distinction, because I must say even with the hsts, e.g. Blaire White, when Blaire is talking/gesturing etc., it does not remind me of a woman at all and I always found that difficult to make sense of. Blaire is much more like a hyper-"effeminate" same-s* attracted male, who though super super hyper-effeminate, is still nothing like any woman I know. The energy is very different.
This is such a useful way to think about it. Even the hsts do not "feel" like women, which I know is hurtful to some to say. They feel to me obviously nothing NOTHING like the AGP energy. But it is still a male expression of self, not a woman.
When Helen made that point about so-called "sissy" highly gender-stereotype non-conforming little boys - and she says these little boys swishing about and flamboyant are NOT like little girls, that absolutely clicked for me. It's so true. They are still, of course, MALE, they are boys not girls, and it is still a kind of male-ness they are exhibiting, it is just not the common form of masculinity...
And ditto for same-s* attracted females. As girls, the tomboy is NOT a boy. She is still exhibiting a self that is female, not male. It is just a less-common, less socially-rewarded part of the range of how females express 'self'.
Ugh all this terminology and trying to grapple with the right words to articulate things, it's a language/concept nightmare.
@@L_Martin Effeminate men are not at all like women .
Blaire White does look like a woman, but does not act like a woman.
@@L_Martin very well articulated. Thank you.
@@L_Martin "less socially rewarded" is such a key term -- you see it and feel that, yet ppl act like it doesn't exist and as if they do not enforce it. On the surface, it makes becoming the "opposite gender" easier than bucking the system.
@@tablescissors Yeah, I'd even say it's not just "not rewarded", it's actively PUNISHED. Which kids get bullied? Definitely the GNC ones.
Women have to thread the needle of being just the "right" kind of feminine. If you go too far in one direction you're called stupid and a hoe. If you don't take care of your appearance or you're fat, you get insults of a different kind.
For the males, being sissy is the worst thing you can be. That's definitely the message they're still given, even today in the UK it's obvious that sissy boys / effeminate men have to really work put the work in to cultivate attractive personality traits or abilities because if they don't they're treated as worst than worthless. Males who are naturally more stereotypically masculine don't get punished, ditto for females - and obviously looking attractive helps enormously.
I think both males and females get punished for being GNC, but in different ways. I agree with you totally - easier to hop the fence, less heartache (or so it seems to kids especially).
Having had a mastectomy for breast cancer I can tell you that it does indeed come with many complications and side effects. I can’t even imagine the devastating consequences of something like phaloplasty😢. Also I have heard trans activists asking to prioritise mastectomies for them as more important than breast cancer patients. It is just awful all of this. Also living with a single mastectomy does not make me half man! 🤪
❤️❤️
More important than breast cancer patients? Anyone who says that is not connected with reality
@Lindy T I’m sorry you’re going through that. Some women have no issues. I have some nerve damage and also shoulder pain. The scar is well healed but very tender and sore a year on. Also I have developed a little lymphoedema, which is probably more of a result of my lymph node clearance, though it can happen with just mastectomy surgery. Wishing you well on your journey. 🙏💙🙏
Phalloplasty is nothing short of ghoulish butchery. I won't go into detail, just ... people, if you're squeamish, don't look it up.
Nothing can EVER be more important than trans stuff. NOT. EVER. No exceptions.
I could listen to these two articulate women all day long. So refreshing and stimulating!
Helen Joyce is the Voice of Reason, Period!
No Phobic Anything
THANK YOU. "Variant masculinity" and "variant femininity". I completely agree that we have gone backward in accepting human beings as they are. I appreciate your super-sensible voices.
Two really important people having a really important discussion - thank you!
I love Helen fiercely. One of my biggest heroes! But I’m so thrilled to have discovered this channel! Brilliant!
I created a special RUclips playlist “outstanding” because of Helen Joyce and she hasn’t failed yet!
For me nothing has highlighted more clearly how badly women are disregarded, diminished, insulted and undermined by our establishment than the ease with which women rights have been sidelined by the trans lobby. Like Helen I am shocked at how fragile women's rights have proved to be.
Me too. I'm a man, and in my younger days I actually felt as if feminism was just this toxic, bourgeois victim stance when hearing about silly things like "mansplaining", "manspreading" etc. Fast forward and here we are. Women's spaces invaded, sports destroyed, male rapists getting transferred to female prisons, teen girls body parts taken off...
It's so disheartening.
Ohh feminism was great as long as it was hurting boys and men 😂😂
@@vladimir.putinn_007 what do you mean hurting men and boys. Men and boys needed to change as much as women did but too many of them wanted to maintain an undeserved superior status. Grow up and learn something for the sake of young boys.
Genuine questions. What specific rights do you feel like women have lost? and how has it affected your life?
@@jl789nz The right to privacy, dignity and safe women's only spaces. And also the right to compete in sports on fair grounds.
I have watched many interviews with Helen on this issue because she is so easy and intellectually invigorating to listen to. There is overlap, but different questions result in new insights every time. Thanks for this conversation, it was absolutely brilliant.
Wish you a huge success with this podcast ! Thank you for your work !
38:45 Helen articulates something important that I've thought about but was unable to quite realize and frame. She offers a cogent explanation for why we're being coerced into having a "correct attitude" that is atypical of most liberation or rights movements. If I want the right to, say, use a currently proscribed recreational drug, I don't need you to share in my enthusiasm or approval of the activity in order to enjoy that right, should it be attained. Great discussion, thanks.
As a guy I've just fell down the culture war rabbit hole and Helen Joyce just crushes it!
This is episode is just SO good. I’ve listened to it 3 times now. I think it’s my favourite discussion that Louise has done in this series so far. I’m going to buy Helen’s book now.
So good to hear reality discussed without the blinding fog of ideology. Keep the content coming. Thank you
Helen is against bodily autonomy.
Excellent. Really excellent. Two extremely smart ladies talking for over an hour. What the podcast format was designed for.
Please continue speaking truth to power. Helen and Louise are so sensible and honest. Real women would never be so arrogant and stupid as to say the things that trans ‘women’ spew regularly. I am reminded of the man who told JK Rowling that he is more woman than she will ever be.
Helen is a hypocrite. She thinks mutilating unborn babies is fine, but wants to force adults into not transitioning.
hard to believe this is only the third episode
consistently outstanding work right out the gate. bravo!
Thank you. As someone who was previously rad fem leaning, I've tried getting across the points about the similarity between gender ideology and rad fem ideology in terms of having trouble facing reality. To no avail. So many RF don't wanna hear it. But It's time to stop pretending biology doesn't largely influence the differences between men and women and, as women, we get informed because we are the ones who suffer most for being out of the loop.
Agreed! And it's lonely, as a millennial I'll just say, the older GC women are very resistant to acknowledging how much biology shapes females deeply (in terms of our preferences, our personalities, etc.), and the young "intersectional feminists" are all naturally brain-poisoned on gender identity theory where biology means nothing and it's all just social constructs and there is nothing stable and everything that looks stable is just an illusion.
It's very tricky though to walk that line and say "Biology, if you are male or female, matters SO MUCH and is so fundamental - but that does not mean women belong in the kitchen". It's like I feel there is nowhere for feminism to go after acknowledging how much biology dictates the female experience (beyond just "we bear the children" and "society expects x of us", but actually owning up to this thing of agreeableness and all the rest of it)
I think we are all terrified of the mentality of men like Matt Walsh, and other religious ideologies, pouncing on this and trying to force women and men back into rigid roles, and calling a woman dysfunctional/defective or something if her life doesn't revolve around having kids and housekeeping.
I am a feminist. What is rad fem?
I have had to repeatedly justify to Caucasian, White women that there are distinct differences in the statistics of crime and the psychology motivating the genders. Like it or not, it doesn't care about your ideology and it exists.
@@jujutrini8412 Radical feminism. Type of feminism which conceptualises patriarchy as oppression of all women by all men. It lacks nuance and dismisses individuality.
I've actually found the opposite with rad fem online spaces, they often understand male violence against women as inevitable and a biological feature of all men. In online spaces sex essentialism was very strong. But my main gripe with radical feminism is the idea that all men are oppressive to all women. Just reminds me of Critical Race Theory nonsense. Any ideology trying to convince me that a person's character and behaviour will be based on their physical characteristics is not something I'm willing to subscribe to.
This whole interview was great. I've read Helen Joyce's book. It is a must read! I will say about the last 10 minutes of this interview was axis shifting for me. I am neither a feminist nor antifeminist but I what is a raised around left to far left in America and about the last 10 min conversation in this interview goes so far beyond anything I would ever encounter. I'm subscribing to this channel!
Great conversation! Glad to see your subscribers going up.
Great conversation. Despite being in this fight for many years in Australia I heard some things which gave me food for thought.
In years to come our descendants will wonder how anyone could believe being in the wrong body was a possibility and the horrific scandal of mutilating children and young adults that followed.
I have heard people comparing it to lobotomy. I think the comparism fits.
What is the problem? Psychologically fragile people removing themselves from the gene pool - sounds like evolution in action!
I would love to hear more from Helen about economics that benefits women and children.
Love the description of variant femininity and variant masculinity. As a lesbian who fancies masculine women I've had to explain to multiple people why I date manly women if I like females. Because there's an undeniable and irresistible femaleness to masculine women that is nothing like men have.
I think people pretend to be thick when it comes to some things. It’s a way of making lesbians have to explain themselves when it’s blinking obvious.
That was very insightful. Appreciate your viewpoint as a pansexual myself.
Too right! Hurrah for the butch female 🎉
I have always found androgynous people sexy, so do many, but I don't find pretenders interesting...that is no longer the blending of energies, that is one thing fully posing as another.
@@jirenthegray2904 *bisexual
you two both encourage me so much to speak my mind more often in my everyday life. not just when it comes to these topics.
I am glad you exist. I rarely had female rolemodels, my mother has too much internalised misogyny, she only made my life harder as a teen. now, in my early 30s I feel more confident than I have ever been and thanks to you I now have the words to voice so many things that have been bothering me. thank you!!
This was awesome hahaha, thanks. I first saw you on Modern Wisdom, read your book in one plane flight, and when you mentioned this on your Jordan Peterson interview I instantly subscribed. I do hope the trans movement loses steam, soon, but I am worried.
Frankly, though, I'm beginning to wonder whether "right" and "left" as descriptors might be antiquated. There are some pretty strange alliances forming if we think in those terms.
Helen is brilliant. As fluent as her writing and thinking are, she has a gift for speaking.
Thank you so much for this podcast. For some time I've been very vocal about the fact that I'm "not a feminist" because I just feel that those who use the term are drifting so far from real women's issues and attempting to slay and/or invent such tiny and insignificant dragons... and im totally bored by how most people just regurgitate sound bites from the left that dont actually mean anything. the last part of this discussion is the only thing I've heard I think ever that might convince me that there is still use for the term. I'd be so interested in more conversations around the maiden/mother/matriarch triad, especially diving into motherhood and mothers issues. Looking forward to more thought provoking conversations.
Always love seeing Helen’s bookcase. So many great reads.
Thank you Louise and Helen for sharing this discussion. It's superb in content and style - important, courageous yet measured, and as kind and empathetic as it could be. At bedrock, and with two young daughters who are growing up fast, I really appreciate the commitment to an axiom that there is objective reality with facts that can be known. Accepting that, we can then face honestly the positive and negative consequences. That seems to me the only sound basis for discussion, and thank you for anchoring in such terms .
Really interesting interview! This was my introduction to Helen and I will definitely buy her book. The idea that women's innate kindess (or desire to help the weak, however you want to put it) leads them to support the trans movement is reminiscent of the recent controversy over drag queens performing in front of children. These events are being attended by young, heterosexual mums, and they are the ones who are supporting it and calling critics of it bigots. They are the ones who are trying to gaslight anyone who dares suggest that it's not appropriate for children. Obviously most women think it's disgusting but I suspect that men ate much less likely to give these "performers" the benefit of the doubt. A male perspective is - these guys are perverts, there's no other reason to do this.
I think you're right--yes, it's the young women brainwashed by the prevailing zeitgeist (though I suspect there's an Emperor's New Clothes element at work here too) who support this grotesquerie. Women of the older generations tend to think the drag queen storytime stuff is deplorable. Young kids shouldn't be exposed to this. (I've never found drag to be amusing. While some of the performers may be talented, I've never bought the justification that, by representing the worst patriarchal stereotypes of women, they're actually parodying them.) It also nauseates me and most of the older women I know to see little kids cavorting at Gay Pride parades along with half-naked men in leather straps. I consider fetishism utterly degrading. Perhaps we should bring back the good old-fashioned notion of "shame." How pathetic to centre your life on bizarre variants of sexual gratification--or even "normal" sexual gratification.
You are both absolute heros to me. Thank you for your work protecting and prioritizing women and children.
wow, such an interesting discussion, thank you!
Such a calm, intelligent interview!! Thank you very much!
This is one of the sanest conversations on the internet
That's a pretty low bar, but yes, there are few intelligent people out there.
@@sarahsnowe I'm more so thinking sanity over intelligence. Why is it such a low bar?
@@HildaDeerfoxdoesn't get mainstream clicks thats why
Thanks you folks ! It's really important that these conversations are available to listen to and reflect on, these days. It's so easy to to get lost in amongst the lots of extreme ideas that have suddenly popped up everywhere ! I'm an ordinary middle class male in my 7th decade and depend on people like you to help me pick my way through the modern world...
This was an amazing conversation! Thank you both and please, more of this!!!🙏💖
Really interesting conversation! Thankyou, and looking forward to hearing more!
Fascinating, and I hadn't deeply considered the very biological distinct cycles that a female experiences vs. a spectrum-like biology for males. Some of the cycles within a female's life are as different in needs and societal response as the broad differences between sexes.
HJ is brilliant, thanks for having her on
The part about the sexualities and the sexes and the different types of masculinity and femininity is highly fascinating! I have observed these things like that in the real world and it is wonderful to hear it confirmed like that!
First, I am thrilled that Louise Perry now has a channel. Second, this was a *fascinating* interview.
1:06:15
"Maybe there are seeds within leftist ideology that will always lead us here"
After considering myself on the left (because of economic leftism) for a long time, I had this realization as well.
The way it came clear to me, is that I thought that you could open the door to leftism and only welcoming in the bits you like and not inviting the rest inside, thereby ending up with an ideal society. It became clear to me in 2016 that, in fact, the left always devolves into its essence. That you can't open the door and keep the wind from blowing in and bringing whatever it likes with it. Once the door is open, anything and everything waiting on the other side can and will come barreling in.
That's when I became a conservative.
I cannot like this talk enough. It answers so many questions. Thank you ladies.
1. “When you have beliefs that are harmful to human beings, they are more harmful to women and children.”
2. “It’s worse than lying to be kind, it’s lying to be good.”
I mean I’m not even 15 minutes in and I’m moved.
Louise and Helen, please keep up the amazing work!
Thank you for this important interview!
That was a very interesting talk, thank you!
Two of my favourite women in politics!
I must say that both of you women are among my most admired people in the public sphere....and I don't have that many on my list (only 5 or 6). Thanks for representing women so well!
It's the same for me.
I was born with club feet and had a series of surgical interventions to straighten my feet and allow me to walk. I live with the cost of that in terms of chronic pain, lack of medical understanding and physical imbalances. The other cost would be somewhat similar so it was a good call. This idea that people can chop off parts of their bodies with no consequences is madness. We are not Mr and Mrs potato heads!
Such an insightful conversation. Thanks ladies!
The idea of "variant" femininity / masculinity is gold. First time hearing about it - makes so much sense. Also loved the bit on how autogynephelia is at the core of the gender ideology especially with projecting it onto children. This whole episode was fascinating - thank you so much!!!
Louise, your work is amazing. Please keep doing what you are doing. Women like you give me hope for the future.
Thank you for inviting Helen. Very interesting conversation.
So glad you are doing a podcast Louise! I'm a huge fan. Keep it up 🙌
Fantastic conversation, I have huge admiration for you both 👏 I'm one of the angry mothers you refer to!
I love the name of your channel! (So much kinder than Maiden,Mother, Crone!)
Fantastic talk …both of these women really get what is going on.
Thankyou Helen, for your work 😊❤
Didn't realise you had your own channel. Instant sub!!✊️
Helen is a gem.
Amazing conversation
Agree 6:08 ! I’ve never been engaged but I’m now hyper aware. I’m furious at what I’ve lost! And I’m winning debates with pro trans people regarding women’s safety. I think men are waking up.
I love that Helen's got the Ink Black Heart on the shelf. I've got it too in my library.
Interesting discussion. Thanks. I don't really agree with the RadFem framing of the trans issue as being primarily one of male vs female, though. Rather it seems to be an issue of men & women on the political Left (most of them ostensibly Feminist) who over the years have adopted certain ways of thinking that have mainstreamed what used to be an extremely fringe and irrelevant subculture. Now the few saner factions of the Left are scrambling to contain a beast of the Left's own making.
We are backing the 1800's regarding WOMENS RIGHTS.
Hello Louise, I'm a new subscriber. I found your podcast via your recent interview with Jordan Peterson, but I first saw you on your interview with the Spectator.
I've always wondered about the 10 week stage of the foetus, witch determines what 'sex' we become, that something goes array i.e. too much estrogen/tesestrone???
Men & Women Are different & not just opposites; men do often see (most) women as not quite full people like themselves & women do often see (most) men as not people at all & readily disposable.
Patriarchy might oppress with hierarchies
Matriarchy might oppress with elimination
Based
I'm glad people bring up the trans connection with profit by companies..
Great discussion ladies.
Good chat thx.
When we lie to ourselves repeatedly we build a society on lies that doesn't suit our needs.
Loved this.
Rightly said!
43:19 This reminds me of the other day when I was watching a video of Shape Shifter (an HSTS detrans man, for those who don't know) and thinking, "He's feminine, but feminine like a drag queen, not feminine like a woman."
Were the police cowards or just didn't care? CSA and violence/SA against females is unreported and when it is the police don't deal with it, even when they do, it rarely goes to court where victims endure further trauma. The offender rarely get sentenced and if they do they are out of prison in 3 or 4 yrs to keep offending. There's no consequences yet the victims whole life is ruined.😢
I do agree with you (both) in regards to many issues. I do, however, see more problems with feminism than you seem to acknowledge. I'll venture to make a suggestion that probably won't be taken seriously, but I'll make it, anyway. I'll give the names of three women that I offer as possibilities for being brought for a talk: Janice Fiamengo, Karen Straughan or Alison Tieman. Any of them would be able to carry a very nice conversation, I''m sure (from a point of view seldom even recognized). Of the three, Janice is the one with academic credentials, being a former university professor in Canada, if that matters.
Very insightful
Helen Joyce for prime minister!!!!!
37:14 one of the things that paved the way for trans ideology is treating gay men like honorary women and women always appointing themselves to protect them. Helen talks about the previous research that found straight men’s reason for being trans as deviant but gay men just “fit in better as women.” I don’t think that gay men’s intentions should have ever been portrayed so innocently.
When Children are treated as Human Beings by Our Society, everything will turn around.
Interesting and insightful
I find the point about the healthcare industry making money by not helping people interesting because I have a similar belief about language-learning. Many of the most economically successful apps, platforms and companies have appalling results but hook clients into paying for years to not improve very much at all.
Brilliant
I have a crush on Helen Joyce. What a mind.
I absolutely loved this interview, especially acknowledging masculine and feminine on different scales, as opposed to going down the route of changing your entire gender based on typical stereotypes of how men and women behave. And the why behind the trans activism makes me so angry. The top of the crop with a nasty fetish, that can’t pass for a women demanding we all play along.
Being critical of this new trans movement is not a left or right issue. It’s a woman’s issue. Feminists on the left have always taken into account economic policy and raising women out of poverty being essential. These two women are being disingenuous. Women caring for their children is not a left or right issue. The reason why we are not heard is that we are poor and don’t have highflying jobs and the media only invites right wing people to air their opinions.
'...and the media only invites right wing people to air their opinions.'
The subjective casting of the demarcations of the Left-Right spectrum is just another reason why it's frequently a useless lense to employ.
That & the fact that there are two of them, economic & social, which don't always align.
The male incel to trans pipeline should be investigated more.
I think so too.
I’m a lesbian in my late 30’s and my whole life I have never cared more been interested in feminism or anything of the like. This whole debate has me actively involved and now giving a damn about what is going on. I’ve learnt more about feminism in the last two years than I have ever known. I honestly don’t even know what type I would call myself but as a gay woman I’m fed up with the bull.
First interview I have seen you do where you both are coming from the same place. Of course that is the norm, conservatives talk to other conservatives and vice versa. What has been interesting for me is hearing what the younger generations obsess about which I haven't focused on enough and I have picked your channel to start on mostly cause I was researching Christian Nationalism and you turned up talking to Allie Beth Stuckey and caught my interest
autogynaphillia as the core of trans activism -- very interesting.
Interesting conversation
A saw a picture of I would guess a 15 year old girl. She was standing with her mum or a female family member, she had a very short hair cut and stood there with a beaming smile on her face. You could tell she was in pjs that she had especially picked out for her stay in hospital. Because as she stood there with her cheery family member with her bright yellow t-Rex cartoon pajamas she had just had a double mastectomy and was smiling like she had just won the lottery. I was horrified absolutely horrified and that’s the moment I saw trans ideology for what it was a pernicious toxic cult. Everything I’ve learnt in the last couple of months I don’t know how I didn’t see it before or how I could have missed it. Girls at 15 cutting of perfectly healthy breasts for something they have no way of truly understanding the repercussions of at that age. I hope that girl doesn’t change her mind. It’s barbaric and I can’t believe our politicians and academics are championing this and shutting down any who oppose the be kind or we will make you regret it philosophy. It’s insanity.
I agree with essentially everything that Helen said up until she asserted that women are more complex than men. I understand why she would make the assertion, but I disagree with it. I think much more effort has gone into understanding women's complexities, and men's complexities are largely ignored or not understood. I think this will become ever more apparent in an age where a growing number of men are 'falling behind' their female counterparts in terms of education and job performances, with women wanting a man of equal or greater 'value' in these categories, and a shrinking number of men fitting that description. I think we'll be forced to reassess a position of men or their needs being comparatively simple in the coming decade.
Some of the controversy has arisen from the power of social stereotypes. Masculine vs feminine demonstrated via behavioral styles rather than actual biological differences.
1:16:32 Old women aren't the most disposable people in society; they aren't in almost any society I can think of. When there is no society but instead a situation of raw struggle for survival, then old women may be the most disposable because they are of the least use to everyone else then.
Men who are deemed undesirable by women are usually the most disposable group in any society; though in non-sexed terms babies unwanted by their mothers are probably actually the most disposable.
In any case, except where externalities supercede, it is Women that usually dictate who as a group is Most Disposable in a Society.
Older women have lost value in society because younger women now devalue motherhood, (whilst men's opinion on or value of older women is mostly unchanged); & it seems more of a narcisisstic addiction to the power of female youth that is driving things, certainly not the esteem of men themselves, which more than ever is an instrument for obtaining what a girl wants & measuring her place in the female pecking order.
What successful woman cares what a man thinks because he's thinking it, let alone men in general? Only if it's about her.