A non-collaborative IEP meeting

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 янв 2025

Комментарии • 26

  • @DrPalsgraf
    @DrPalsgraf Год назад +2

    *"No, we didn't go. It's 20 minutes away."* Only twenty minutes away?! I wish my high school was only a 20 minute drive!

  • @davidparada1307
    @davidparada1307 6 лет назад +7

    The camera melted due to all the hot air being passed around the room. LOL! I am curious what happened after the 7:05 mark.

  • @fishermclemore9120
    @fishermclemore9120 7 лет назад +7

    Both sides came in already deciding the fate of the child.

  • @123ladida123
    @123ladida123 11 лет назад +9

    Least Restrictive Environment is the law. And teachers should be trained to work with kids with disabilities. Independent assessments must be considered, but they do have to be provided to the school for consideration. The parents aren't backing up their reasons for 3x weekly sessions. The school isn't asking any questions at all - only restating their position over and over. The parents aren't either, but LRE is the law and on their side.

  • @herzrimaz
    @herzrimaz 11 лет назад +1

    It is a good example, we, as instructors, can share it in the classrooms. Was the video cut off at the 7.05 mark? There doesn't seem to be a concluding remark by any one of the characters. Thanks for this fine video!!

  • @AngelaBerger
    @AngelaBerger 3 года назад +5

    As a parent, this is when you stop the meeting and come back with an advocate.

    • @DrPalsgraf
      @DrPalsgraf Год назад +1

      ... an advocate who'll listen to these school representatives! They want him to be in a general education classroom for socialization skills, and that's EXACTLY what they're offering at "the Kennedy school," with special assistance in the afternoons for students who are deaf or have hearing loss.

  • @tracymccoy3193
    @tracymccoy3193 2 года назад

    It seems that the parents need an advocate.

  • @taxida9678
    @taxida9678 8 лет назад +9

    The parents need a hearing aid!

  • @billhansbury9376
    @billhansbury9376 7 лет назад +5

    WHERE IS REED? Shouldn't he be there? At least for part of ARD/IEP?

    • @quietus5138
      @quietus5138 7 лет назад

      Exactly.

    • @Alypuff5
      @Alypuff5 5 лет назад +1

      @@nerdmain9019 The child is required to be in IEP meetings about themselves because of the 2004 IDEA amendment.

    • @kelleykalomiris2231
      @kelleykalomiris2231 4 года назад

      @@nerdmain9019 Dead wrong, my friend.

    • @parrismurry6699
      @parrismurry6699 4 года назад +2

      The child is in elementary school, most elementary (and middle) students do not sit in on the meeting.

    • @kelleykalomiris2231
      @kelleykalomiris2231 4 года назад

      @@parrismurry6699 Again, wrong.

  • @charleswalker321
    @charleswalker321 4 года назад +1

    Time to homeschool Reed.

  • @maylingmavalvala7380
    @maylingmavalvala7380 4 года назад +3

    Both parties have gone into the meeting with their own agenda. The student is not present because he/she is a under 16 years of age. The parents clearly do not want to send their child to a school where he/she might not be in a mainstream class, they have not taken the time to visit and observe if that setting would be beneficial to the student. The school/Board on the other hand keep insisting that they know whats best for the student and are unwilling to look at the possibility of extra therapy sessions or an aide for the student - in a main stream setting.

  • @dannyku1406
    @dannyku1406 4 года назад +1

    I would slap them