He won the third set and the match against Federer, but ended up losing the 2nd, 3rd set and the match against Djokovic in Montreal and Nadal in Rome. That first set against Nadal though....
@@TheseHoesAreLoyal i dont think so. i played very well. i even won a set against ATP 750 in team match. Gulbis has much better backhand than forehand.if you see his matches and count misstackes and winners on his forehand side, you would see it.
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 yeah you're talking about the same guy who managed to beat Fed at the 2014 RG by firing from all cylinders especially with his serve and forehand.
@@TheseHoesAreLoyal lol. did you see this match. Gulbis won becaurce Federer gave the match away. Every tennis player , who has great forehand , playes inside out forehand. but Gulbis almost never playes inside out forehand.how can you explane it?
The problème with Gulbis is that he said he don't really care about tennis. Also he didn't care about price money cause he had lot of money even before playing. He had the talent to be top 10 for long time, but in his head it was just a game. And so, he had no reason to compete at his best everytime. There are some players like that. I think about Kyrgios, Fognini... these kind of players don't play all the matches at 100%. They only play good when they want, when it's big matches and often when it's against big opponent.
@@Telescope1994Kyrgios is a way more richer than Gulbis. I forgotten which tournament he was thrown balls out cause he didn’t want to play anymore and in the after interview he said doesn’t want to play, he was already rich… it was young at the time, for a tennis player. He is the son of a malesian Princess( she left the crown, but the money stays😂😂)
Tennis viewers on RUclips cannot enjoy anything humorous it has to be who beats who and who has the best stats. Sometimes it’s hard to deny facts that if not hampered by injuries Gulbis would’ve been the goat. NO QUESTION.
Records of Gulbis with each one of the BIG 3: against Nadal 0-7 against Djokovic 1-7 against Federer 2-3 that means 3- 17 against The Big 3. Who toyed who?
Hi there, it should be said that winning any set 6:1 against Rafael Nadal on clay is a superb performance...we can say "almost toying" ... however E. Gulbis had always lost every match versus Rafa and didn´t prove his mental power though.
I remember when he win roger in Roland garos also his historic match with nadal i still think he is one of the best tennis player i even seen , big serve , super backhand forehand , dropshots everything was great,,i don't know why he suddenly disappeared...
He had the talent to play on their level, but as nadal pointed out, there’s more to winning a match then just hitting the best shots. It’s a shame he never lived up to his talent
Infuriating watching Gulbis, knowing how good he could be and just not applying himself. I think if you were to match up his skill with the big 3 competitiveness you have a multi grand slam winner.
There are a handful of players that I genuinely think would have smoked the big 3 if only they were a bit more mature and put in the necessary work and commitment . Gulbis is one of them, as well as kyrgios, nalbandian, fognini, soderling and a few others. These guys are scary when they're at their best.
Not sure that we have the same definition of "toying" with a player. Gulbis has a pretty low H2H record with the big 3. Winning a set here and there is not toying with the opponent :)
That forehand technique is wild. He started with a more conventional style and then decided to stick his hand out like a kid pretending to be a plane and his game went downhill…. Although seemed to hit it ok in that Nadal match. Anyway, very good player that unfortunately underachieved for his talent.
''TOYED'' LOL, that never happened, at least when it comes to Nadal and Djokovic! Gublis managed to win Djoko only once in his carear (2009 in Brisbane 6:4, 6:4) out of the eight matches they played and in the case of Nadal, he lost all seven matches they played!!! Hardly any sane person can call that TOYED unless if it's paid by Gublis' daddy to praise his son's tennis career!!
![Skilla Baby - Misfit (Feat. Polo G) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IjsylSnNMyw/mqdefault.jpg)
Rome 2010, Montreal 2015, Rome 2013.
Don't forget to leave a like, your support means everything 🙏
He won the third set and the match against Federer, but ended up losing the 2nd, 3rd set and the match against Djokovic in Montreal and Nadal in Rome. That first set against Nadal though....
And then one day he decided to play challenger events and throw crazy tantrums.
Lmao, I have not heard "Lord Gulbis" in ages.
Me too hahaha. I Almost forgot his nickname 😂😂😂
And then went on to loose those 3 matches... Shows exactly the character Gulbis is😂😂😂
Won federer in a grand slam
Gulbis has insane power on his forehand and backhand. He was up there with Soderling
not on forehand.his forehand was average
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 If you think that's average, then your optical function might be a bit impaired
@@TheseHoesAreLoyal i dont think so. i played very well. i even won a set against ATP 750 in team match.
Gulbis has much better backhand than forehand.if you see his matches and count misstackes and winners on his forehand side, you would see it.
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 yeah you're talking about the same guy who managed to beat Fed at the 2014 RG by firing from all cylinders especially with his serve and forehand.
@@TheseHoesAreLoyal lol. did you see this match. Gulbis won becaurce Federer gave the match away. Every tennis player , who has great forehand , playes inside out forehand. but Gulbis almost never playes inside out forehand.how can you explane it?
The problème with Gulbis is that he said he don't really care about tennis. Also he didn't care about price money cause he had lot of money even before playing. He had the talent to be top 10 for long time, but in his head it was just a game. And so, he had no reason to compete at his best everytime.
There are some players like that. I think about Kyrgios, Fognini... these kind of players don't play all the matches at 100%. They only play good when they want, when it's big matches and often when it's against big opponent.
But kyrgios does not come from money
I think gulbis IS the goat in France they call him gulbite.
Marat Safin also didn't wanted to be a tennis player
@@Telescope1994Kyrgios is a way more richer than Gulbis. I forgotten which tournament he was thrown balls out cause he didn’t want to play anymore and in the after interview he said doesn’t want to play, he was already rich… it was young at the time, for a tennis player.
He is the son of a malesian Princess( she left the crown, but the money stays😂😂)
@@pabloescobar_8896 that explains a lot of his spoiled behavior
Tennis viewers on RUclips cannot enjoy anything humorous it has to be who beats who and who has the best stats.
Sometimes it’s hard to deny facts that if not hampered by injuries Gulbis would’ve been the goat. NO QUESTION.
Records of Gulbis with each one of the BIG 3:
against Nadal 0-7
against Djokovic 1-7
against Federer 2-3
that means 3- 17 against The Big 3. Who toyed who?
1-14 against Djokovic and Nadal. lol I'm disappointed in Federer.
the title clearly says 'when Gulbis toyed with big3', it's just focusing on the points which he toyed with big3, do you understand english?
Gulbis is a child against Rafa and Nole.
Hi there, it should be said that winning any set 6:1 against Rafael Nadal on clay is a superb performance...we can say "almost toying" ... however E. Gulbis had always lost every match versus Rafa and didn´t prove his mental power though.
The game was too easy for his Lordship, so he went ahead and chose to ruin his forehand to allow for his subjects to be more competitive
The 3 Goats: Lord Gulbis, Lord Paire and of course, Lord Tomic.
How bout Kygrios and Bublik?
I remember when he win roger in Roland garos also his historic match with nadal i still think he is one of the best tennis player i even seen , big serve , super backhand forehand , dropshots everything was great,,i don't know why he suddenly disappeared...
So he won one set a piece with the Top 3 and the headline says Lord Gulbis toyed with them? Fair enough
That's kinda the joke with Gulbis. Just like Chael Sonnen in the UFC
He had the talent to play on their level, but as nadal pointed out, there’s more to winning a match then just hitting the best shots. It’s a shame he never lived up to his talent
Gulbis was a Luxe edition of Tennis 🎾 ever...
Infuriating watching Gulbis, knowing how good he could be and just not applying himself. I think if you were to match up his skill with the big 3 competitiveness you have a multi grand slam winner.
if you want a good laugh, google ernests gulbis quotes. he's a funny man.
ernests
Almost bagelling Nadal on clay is some feat
Djokovic leads H2H 7-1
Federer leads 3-2
Nadal leads 7-0
Seems like only Federer struggled.
They toyed with him a lot more
I love how Djokovic's one is him just winning a few games lol
It's more like toying with his own game until he messed it up for good.
The forehand was good before he changed jt
H2H Stats : NADAL 7 - 0 GULBIS / FEDERER 3 - 2 GULBIS / DJOKOVIC 7 - 1 GULBIS. Please can you explain who TOYED who? LOL
que barbaridad
Ecactly.
@@Thebtfgame Lord who? Me parto!
If Gulbis was poor growing up he would've been a monster.
@@Thebtfgame a la altura de joselu
I miss early gulbis looking like narkuss si much :(
OOOO OOOOO
There are a handful of players that I genuinely think would have smoked the big 3 if only they were a bit more mature and put in the necessary work and commitment . Gulbis is one of them, as well as kyrgios, nalbandian, fognini, soderling and a few others. These guys are scary when they're at their best.
Wouldve smoked? Nah, maybe almost as good as them though
Andy Murray
@@squidjames7735Andy Murray was successful. He just got injured.
@@pradeepsahoo7243DelPo without injuries was worthy opponent against anyone.
@@4zafinc Yes, true. I guess some players are just unlucky.
you toy us
Not sure that we have the same definition of "toying" with a player. Gulbis has a pretty low H2H record with the big 3. Winning a set here and there is not toying with the opponent :)
That forehand technique is wild. He started with a more conventional style and then decided to stick his hand out like a kid pretending to be a plane and his game went downhill…. Although seemed to hit it ok in that Nadal match. Anyway, very good player that unfortunately underachieved for his talent.
he humiliated dopal 61 wow
Only Nadal. Against Djoko it was 7-5
You meant gulbis had won a set against big 3 😂😂
Like if you are here after he retires
Tennis doesn't nor won't exist for one setters.
Gulbis has money like water. He doesn't care about his tennis.
Google his father...
@thebtfgame Is this Gulbis himself? Calling himself a Lord???
Nadal 7x0 Gulbis.
Did he win any of these matches?
Nope
Ma poi ha perso😂
да, помним такого, потенциал был большой, но так и ничего не выиграл, ноль
He was defeated by his own mind extremely weak mentally couldn’t control the angry or even direct it better.
Yes, but Gulbis had not the carrier of thé Big three.
''TOYED'' LOL, that never happened, at least when it comes to Nadal and Djokovic! Gublis managed to win Djoko only once in his carear (2009 in Brisbane 6:4, 6:4) out of the eight matches they played and in the case of Nadal, he lost all seven matches they played!!! Hardly any sane person can call that TOYED unless if it's paid by Gublis' daddy to praise his son's tennis career!!
this guy wasted his talent
Wasted talent and choker. Sad to see 😢
Roger was injured that match
How do you know that?
Nothing special. He was at the same level as them
That's the definition of special
There can only be one Lord. His name is Nicklas Bendtner.
Connor McLeod.