The reason why it's so brilliant to have these kinds of players on the tour is it forces great players to analyse, adapt and overcome, which makes for a far more interesting spectacle than just grinding out baseline rallies with power and accuracy. Amazing to watch.
His RUclips channel is EXCELLENT, though. And we can still see some tibreaks playd between him and other japanese current pros (Star Tennis Academy is the channel).
I have to agree. The racquet tech needs to stop because players have too much power. The game looks more like ping pong now. Back in MY day (the 80s) edberg, lendl, wilander becker- these guys had to play the chess match and be great athletes as well.
I'm sure they played at the Australian Open the year before and that was a tight match as well. I remember this match as Federer said in the post-match presser that he could see the headlines of him losing to a player outside the world 1000! Suzuki had a very aggressive game and played with a lot of risk.
Suziki is currently a coach at the Star Tennis Academy in Japan. He's given a lot of great insight into the game on the academy's RUclips channel. Yoshito Nishioka has made a few appearances on the channel as well.
This is why you can never underestimate players who are ranked 1000 or whatever, as all it takes is for them to play the match of their lives and suddenly they are playing at top 5 level. It’s very rare but this video is evident that it can happen in tennis, but I think it was more so when tennis was more serve and volley oriented.
What a great goddam match. So many classic permutations that you just don't see anymore. Gotta love the wildcard system so a classy vet can challenge the young genius. What a treat for the fans. Thanks- for this upload!
They also played each other in the Australian Open. Entertaining match. As some posters have mentioned Takao Suzuki has some good video contents on Star Tennis Academy on RUclips.
@@mikemoggerson6651 the only true grass court specialist on that list is Kyrgios. Being tall and having a good serve doesn't instantly make you a grass courter. The point is those players, no players in fact, have to change their game at all to play at Wimbledon, which is ridiculous. Might as well play the whole tour on hard and be done with it
Takao defeated Srichaphan in early round of this tournament that tells you he was a great player even without this match. I can’t believe his highest ranking was 102.
@@h4rder10 Agree. Actually, he says he should have been more hungry to win. I think he was focused on the Davis Cup matches in Asia including tough matches against Srichaphan or Paes for instance and was on fire as usual. But on tour, he missed some chances to be a top 100 player. If he had won the GS 1st round match against Corretja who was world no.2 at that time in Melbourne in 1999, he would have made it. He lost the match despite had a serving for the match.
damn those serves at 2:01 & at 2:10 .. Unbelievable disguise. Its so difficult to serve it down the T on the Ad-side especially with that kind of a ball toss, almost behind his head. Any lesser player would have gone for the kick out wide.. Fed's serve is so special
Tennis is like a sprinting race…you train and train and train to cut .1 sec of your finish time which ultimately decides whether you finish first or last. That .1 sec equivalent of skill is the difference between 1st rank and 1000th rank. Some rank 1 in woman claiming they can defeat anyone after 1000th ranking in men is utter nonsense since they are not .1 sec behind but a whole second or 2 behind.
Wow. Unbelievable. Talk about pure adrenaline. If this is how #1078th ATP players play, then I can't see Sabalenka or Iga beating them. I guess this is what can happen when highly ranked players have NO footage to study when prepping for their next opponents. Talk about a breath of Fresh air. Now, I know...Dustin Brown was ranked higher, but remember when he was ranked outside the top 100 and opened up a can of whuppass on Nadal? 2x. One of the few that has a winning Head to Head record against Nadal. OMG, I'm amazed. Still shocked. Can't believe this happened.
#1 Jap player he was #102 a few years prior (29yrs here) 2006 the last of the last serve and volley... keeping the pressure on Japanese loved fast courts
...and if you play tennis you know it is possibile to loose against everyone cause it depend from the stile of the contender and from your day even if your name is Federer. Maybe nole and even Rafa have a tennis more regular and stronger mentality than Federa so it is qiute impossible to win against them
@@NamTran-xc2ip Let's see. Federer beat Djokovic at Wimbledon in 2014 & 2015. At that time Djokovic was 27 & 28. Hardly a teenager. Federer beat Nadal at Wimbledon in 2007 when Nadal was 21 and at the Australian Open in 2017 when Nadal was 30. Again not a teenager. This not to take anything away from Djokovic or Nadal. Both great players. However, Federer played all of his matches against Rafter as a teenager. Rafter played his last match in 2001. Federer faced both Djokovic and Nadal long after their teenage years. Your comment statistically makes no sense.
in the first few seconds of this match, I can tell you this is not federer's prime play level, maybe just his prime physical age. he hits much harder now, moves better, and wouldn't make play mistakes in his shot routes like some of these points
@@AL-ss4vr NO WAY 35 Grand Slams..I’m thinking 10,000 Grand Slams…and don’t forget, Federer is still suffering from mononucleosis so he might’ve had 20k Grand Slams…had he been healthy.
No need for screaming or excessive flexing of the biceps, simple quiet winning. Only thing I never liked about Roger: he shakes the umpire’s hand first before the loser.
@@rebecalinares5393 Yeah just like Djokovic he was always yelling at his box, smashing rackets, throwing rackets in the stands, hitting line judges. So classy😅
@@SHVideografie Djokovic is infinitely more classy than Fed. “Lucky shot” Federer lol…meanwhile Djokovic loses and the first thing he does is commend his opponent. Compared to Fed who was always comically salty
Suzuki to his grandchildren: Gather around children. Let your grandpa tell you how he played and almost beat the greatest tennis player of all time. Suzuki grandchildren: Wow grandpa, you actually played against Djokovic, that is so cool. Suzuki: No! You brats! I played against the great Federer. Suzuki grandchildren: Oooh, well, thats great to gramps(i guess😏) 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What I love there is that Suzuki stuck to his aggressive gameplan even tho he got passed so many times at the net. Loads of players wouldn't have the balls to do that, huge respect
@@redd605 honestly the scenario is too hypothetical. Tennis has evolved too much in the span of 30 years that comparing Fed and McEnroe is just nonsense. And Suzuki produced his best tennis whereas Roger (a bit outplayed of course) didn't played as good as usual.
@@pastormaldonaldoempiredemo8995 Ben Shelton of USA has that classic play to upset a lot of players at Wimbledon, I don't know if he is playing queen this week , but most picked him to do well
I feel like in the 90s many of the top modern players would be considered clay court specialists, how far back they hit returns and how much grinding they do. It's weird, now it's like the clay courters took over, everyone is an aggressive player ala Tomas Muster on steroids. But I still think the geometry of the court would favor talented serve and volleyers fi they had the guts and athleticism to stick to that style, or at least employ it a lot more regularly
@@TimelyAdventureyeah especially now that the grass season has started and it just looks like most of the young guys play the same way as on clay. Same speed and bashing from the baseline. Some are scared to go anywhere near the net.
@@understandinglife2481go watch live tennis and tell me if you actually think it’s “slow” You clowns can’t even hold a racket properly and think you are experts
@@understandinglife2481 Yes this surface was from the 90.ies made for players like Becker or Sampras. Maybe they made it for the local player that fast.
Suzuki’s hyper aggressive serve and volley game is what propelled Pistol Pete to his 14 Majors. Fed would incorporate this aggressive rushing the net play later in his career to great success.
Pete would come to the net after serve or an aggressive baseline shot, not a weak floating forehand chop like Suzuki. Also not the same athletic qualities. rushing to the net with weak shots doesnt cut it anymore, players come to the net to finish the points
Fed was always great at smashes (best smash ever) and volleys, but he played most of his youngers years from the baseline due to his big flat forehand being so capable of surpassing any defence
Would love to see genuinely fast courts on tour again. For too long the courts have been slow medium, which has favoured certain players. Wimbledon always throws in surprises because of the nature of the surface
The best serve & volley net players of yesteryear - such as mr Suzuki here and Fed himself - do not mind if they get passed ! The really good ones simply improve placement and tactics as the match wears on The modern game is downright boring by comparison to this
At first I thought it was their AO match with the outrageous around the net pass from Roger. Takao played out of his mind on that day and would have beaten anyone else. We don't see serve and volleys like this anymore.
The reason why it's so brilliant to have these kinds of players on the tour is it forces great players to analyse, adapt and overcome, which makes for a far more interesting spectacle than just grinding out baseline rallies with power and accuracy.
Amazing to watch.
the 90s were replete with players like this, now everybody plays the SAME dumb sh
Because Pro players play to entertain you and not win. Put this kind of play vs agressive baseliner and u have 6 2 6 2 even on grass. Game evolved son
@@PurpleHeater game regressed son...
@@PurpleHeater I'm aware of how the game has evolved, I was just observing what can make a sport entertaining.
@@PurpleHeaterlol baseliners like medevedev,Alcaraz will lose easily to big serve and volleyer
Takao Suzuki is an old school serve volley guy. Super consistent. Of course Federer was better but he showed everyone he was no walkover. Respect!
Federer was just lucky
Seeing this guy on Star Tennis Academy makes me appreciate this even more
yes, it's him I just realize
That's what I thought
i saw him on star tennis academy youtube channel.
Such an incredible match..Takao went for it.
He was one of the very few players who believed that they can beat prime Federer and haven't already lost before the match.
Suzuki was a hell of a player. Too bad we don't get to see people play like that anymore. Just a bunch of slow grinding points that put me to sleep.
agreed!
His RUclips channel is EXCELLENT, though. And we can still see some tibreaks playd between him and other japanese current pros (Star Tennis Academy is the channel).
you re just a casual if you think thats how everyone plays
slow? lol u are so wrong
I have to agree. The racquet tech needs to stop because players have too much power. The game looks more like ping pong now. Back in MY day (the 80s) edberg, lendl, wilander becker- these guys had to play the chess match and be great athletes as well.
I'm sure they played at the Australian Open the year before and that was a tight match as well.
I remember this match as Federer said in the post-match presser that he could see the headlines of him losing to a player outside the world 1000!
Suzuki had a very aggressive game and played with a lot of risk.
Suziki is currently a coach at the Star Tennis Academy in Japan. He's given a lot of great insight into the game on the academy's RUclips channel. Yoshito Nishioka has made a few appearances on the channel as well.
Ha! I thought I recognized that guy. Anyone who can push Roger to work hard is amazing!
Pretty much all of the Japanese pros have. But yeah they make good content
I learned top spin serve from his RUclips
This is why you can never underestimate players who are ranked 1000 or whatever, as all it takes is for them to play the match of their lives and suddenly they are playing at top 5 level. It’s very rare but this video is evident that it can happen in tennis, but I think it was more so when tennis was more serve and volley oriented.
Of course Suzuki was ranked 102 in the world a few years earlier so he was an elite player to begin with.
It's always delight to watch serve and volley.
Wow he was fantastic
What a close match
Wow. Very impressive stuff. He clearly loved the sport and enjoyed playing at home
Notice how Federer shook the umpire’s hand first to show his respect to the local hero.
Unmatched talent and class
現地で観てました。最高の試合でした。鈴木貴男さん、フェデラー、ありがとう…
What a great goddam match. So many classic permutations that you just don't see anymore. Gotta love the wildcard system so a classy vet can challenge the young genius. What a treat for the fans. Thanks- for this upload!
goat Federer is so humble ❤❤❤
More heart than today's garbage young gen. If he'd played in this current generation he would've been top 20 no doubt.
Fed was a monster in 2006 too…
Then what is Djokovic? 😂

@@calinbiris47WHO TF CARES? How inferior you have to feel to always bring up his name? Jeez!
Takao's game play is classic old school, aggressive tennis, serve & volley, slice & approach net for volley
Help me with my new project subscribing to this brand new channel:
youtube.com/@DobleFalta00
They also played each other in the Australian Open. Entertaining match. As some posters have mentioned Takao Suzuki has some good video contents on Star Tennis Academy on RUclips.
Players get like a 300% skill buff when playing with a home crowd. Zhe Zhi Zhang in the Shanghai Masters being the most recent example.
That point at 30-30 and 4-4 in the 3 set where Fed was serving was soooo important and could have been it. Unlucky
I don’t know why I never seen this match before, but Suzuki was GOOD!!!
That court was like lightning Djokovic and Nadal wouldn't last 5 minutes 😂😂
Djokovic has won his 3 finals against Federer at Wimbledon but ok
@@lahire4943 yes, a Wimbledon that has played like a clay court since about 2012, but ok
@@ryanps1598 Good faith is not your strong point as I see
@@ryanps1598 played like a clay court? Would Berettini, Kyrgios, Raonic, Kevin Anderson, make a clay final? The cope is obscene
@@mikemoggerson6651 the only true grass court specialist on that list is Kyrgios. Being tall and having a good serve doesn't instantly make you a grass courter. The point is those players, no players in fact, have to change their game at all to play at Wimbledon, which is ridiculous. Might as well play the whole tour on hard and be done with it
Thanks for sharing. What a fight!
やべぇ。まじで熱い。
Love one handed backhand
I'd love to see hard and grass courts really sped up but to counter the serve-and-nothings take away the second serve!
Takao defeated Srichaphan in early round of this tournament that tells you he was a great player even without this match. I can’t believe his highest ranking was 102.
he looks like a very casual kinda guy. maybe thats why he couldnt put on the consistency needed.
@@h4rder10 Agree. Actually, he says he should have been more hungry to win. I think he was focused on the Davis Cup matches in Asia including tough matches against Srichaphan or Paes for instance and was on fire as usual. But on tour, he missed some chances to be a top 100 player. If he had won the GS 1st round match against Corretja who was world no.2 at that time in Melbourne in 1999, he would have made it. He lost the match despite had a serving for the match.
鈴木さんのyoutubeを見たことがありますが、彼がこんなにすごい選手だとは知りませんでした。Great!!
damn those serves at 2:01 & at 2:10 .. Unbelievable disguise. Its so difficult to serve it down the T on the Ad-side especially with that kind of a ball toss, almost behind his head. Any lesser player would have gone for the kick out wide.. Fed's serve is so special
この時の鈴木は神
Holy net clearance! 5:06
This match speaks to the depth of talent in men's tennis. that a player ranked 1000 can play toe to toe with a top 10 player.
Those slices are deadly
Suzuki played 1000 hrs of Virtua Tennis before in preparation for this match
That thumbnail looked like Federer was saying " you almost got me lol i wasn't even trying"
WELDONE ZUZUKI . CONGRATS FEDERER FOR HOLDING NERVES
Nicely played!
Wow, i never heard of the guy, but he was definitely a real life Echizen Ryouma!!! Way to go Fed, saving the match
make the courts faster again!
The fact that he was never ranked top 100 ATP is beyond me. But I mean he got pretty damn close 102 ATP#
Roger's backhand was the differentiator in this match i believe.
You always have to respect your opponent!
It can be his/her "day" and you have to work hard. 😉
凄いな
Hold on a second... Did Federer ripp off the SABR from Suzuki!!!??
Yeaa
Takao now is doing instruction clips for Star Tennis Academy-SUTATENI - Pro Tennis Lessons. I am learning great tips from him.
Absolutely hate playing the Suzuki type of a player but full of admiration for such a unique and effective style.
yeah...really annoying to deal with, but that's kinda why u respect it
Serve and volley is easy to beat if they don't have enough variety
something I learned from this video
don't play the rally game against better opponent !
Although the score was close, not for a second it felt like Federer was really in trouble... Have to admit I only saw the highlights.
Tennis is like a sprinting race…you train and train and train to cut .1 sec of your finish time which ultimately decides whether you finish first or last. That .1 sec equivalent of skill is the difference between 1st rank and 1000th rank. Some rank 1 in woman claiming they can defeat anyone after 1000th ranking in men is utter nonsense since they are not .1 sec behind but a whole second or 2 behind.
suzuki invented the SABR first
Is there a reason why none of the highlights have him serving out wide lol.
It goes to show you players inside the top 1100 are very good players.
Suzuki was a relentless attacker with a silky smooth slice backhand. He pushed Fed to his limits
I don't know how many times I've seen incredible talent take the 1st set from Roger, then he wins. Roger forever.
Wow. Unbelievable. Talk about pure adrenaline. If this is how #1078th ATP players play, then I can't see Sabalenka or Iga beating them. I guess this is what can happen when highly ranked players have NO footage to study when prepping for their next opponents. Talk about a breath of Fresh air.
Now, I know...Dustin Brown was ranked higher, but remember when he was ranked outside the top 100 and opened up a can of whuppass on Nadal? 2x. One of the few that has a winning Head to Head record against Nadal.
OMG, I'm amazed. Still shocked. Can't believe this happened.
Suzuki's top rank was 102 so not a normal #1000 player.
鈴木貴男のサーブアンドボレー、日本最後のサーブアンドボレーだな。
みんなストローカーだし
Did he started SABR?
Holy sh*t, this was tense. Suzuki showed a world class play.
日本には錦織がいる！！！
Too bad he didn’t beat Federer.
me as a Japanese, it’s kinda weird that i hear Japanese in this youtube channel😂
#1 Jap player he was #102 a few years prior (29yrs here)
2006 the last of the last serve and volley... keeping the pressure on
Japanese loved fast courts
Y eso que Federer le dio todas las chances posibles al honda jajajaja jugo al 50% Federer y aún así le peló los dientes 😅
Was it a Squid Game level?
if federer was truly in his prime then he should be ashamed...
...and if you play tennis you know it is possibile to loose against everyone cause it depend from the stile of the contender and from your day even if your name is Federer.
Maybe nole and even Rafa have a tennis more regular and stronger mentality than Federa so it is qiute impossible to win against them
This is why Fed lose all encounters to Rafter!
Or maybe it was because Federer was a teenager and Rafter was a top 10 player when they played.
@@davidevans1611fedfans dont have a problem including his wins over teenage novak and rafa sooo
@@NamTran-xc2ip Let's see. Federer beat Djokovic at Wimbledon in 2014 & 2015. At that time Djokovic was 27 & 28. Hardly a teenager. Federer beat Nadal at Wimbledon in 2007 when Nadal was 21 and at the Australian Open in 2017 when Nadal was 30. Again not a teenager. This not to take anything away from Djokovic or Nadal. Both great players. However, Federer played all of his matches against Rafter as a teenager. Rafter played his last match in 2001. Federer faced both Djokovic and Nadal long after their teenage years. Your comment statistically makes no sense.
Don't really agree with the title
The difference is that God has given Suzuki this skill for only one day of his life and 310 weeks to Roger. ❤Suzuki
in the first few seconds of this match, I can tell you this is not federer's prime play level, maybe just his prime physical age. he hits much harder now, moves better, and wouldn't make play mistakes in his shot routes like some of these points
🙄
No he doesn't hit harder now. Courts are far slower. Federer is a precision player, not power hitter.
@@shafqatishan437 i’d say he was a bit of both
Federer should have switched the racket in 2009. He would be at 35 GS
@@AL-ss4vr NO WAY 35 Grand Slams..I’m thinking 10,000 Grand Slams…and don’t forget, Federer is still suffering from mononucleosis so he might’ve had 20k Grand Slams…had he been healthy.
if suzuki had a nice voley and more brain, he could be more
ไม่มีลูกตีอ้อมเสาได้ไง
Suzuki would crush Serina Williams and he was the 1000th something ranked man. Too bad he didn't decide to identify as a woman.
No need for screaming or excessive flexing of the biceps, simple quiet winning. Only thing I never liked about Roger: he shakes the umpire’s hand first before the loser.
Id probably let out a roar or two after winning a grand slam
bruh it's shaking the umpire's hand. Who cares?
yeah Federer was always petulant and disrespectful to the opponents, winning or losing. Cut with the same scissors as nadal.
@@rebecalinares5393 Yeah just like Djokovic he was always yelling at his box, smashing rackets, throwing rackets in the stands, hitting line judges. So classy😅
@@SHVideografie Djokovic is infinitely more classy than Fed. “Lucky shot” Federer lol…meanwhile Djokovic loses and the first thing he does is commend his opponent. Compared to Fed who was always comically salty
Suzuki to his grandchildren: Gather around children. Let your grandpa tell you how he played and almost beat the greatest tennis player of all time.
Suzuki grandchildren: Wow grandpa, you actually played against Djokovic, that is so cool.
Suzuki: No! You brats! I played against the great Federer.
Suzuki grandchildren: Oooh, well, thats great to gramps(i guess😏)
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lol
Nishioka did it better
いまの大学生より弱いな、、
ruclips.net/video/KmpCuG0v3CY/видео.html
ラブゲーム？いやらしいな。
Amarodoki najosoke itzmo cocacola sa... I have no idea of what the fuck it means as it was an old advertising from Cocacola and it was in japanise
Roger paid million of yen to drop a set .
Tokyo 2006 QF. Federer ended up winning the 10th title of the season
He played that match like it was his last that day!! Well done!!!
Hay que mejorar un poco mas el ingles hombre
his tenth
Whew that dude was tough. Fed looked pretty sober after that one.
@@carkod how ironic..
What I love there is that Suzuki stuck to his aggressive gameplan even tho he got passed so many times at the net.
Loads of players wouldn't have the balls to do that, huge respect
That was how Sampras and McEnroe , would of destroyed Federer in there prime that first set was outstanding the classic serve volleying of a edberg
@@redd605 honestly the scenario is too hypothetical.
Tennis has evolved too much in the span of 30 years that comparing Fed and McEnroe is just nonsense.
And Suzuki produced his best tennis whereas Roger (a bit outplayed of course) didn't played as good as usual.
@@redd605 but we gotta agree that Suzuki produced a master-class of vintage tennis.
@@pastormaldonaldoempiredemo8995 Ben Shelton of USA has that classic play to upset a lot of players at Wimbledon, I don't know if he is playing queen this week , but most picked him to do well
That's called not having a plan B. And that's why he ended up losing
Suzuki is now very active in youtube with the "Star Tennis Academy" channel... one of the best tennis channels out there!
Entertaining tennis…those were the days. So much better than the monotonous baseline grinding of the current tour.
I feel like in the 90s many of the top modern players would be considered clay court specialists, how far back they hit returns and how much grinding they do. It's weird, now it's like the clay courters took over, everyone is an aggressive player ala Tomas Muster on steroids. But I still think the geometry of the court would favor talented serve and volleyers fi they had the guts and athleticism to stick to that style, or at least employ it a lot more regularly
@@TimelyAdventureyeah especially now that the grass season has started and it just looks like most of the young guys play the same way as on clay. Same speed and bashing from the baseline. Some are scared to go anywhere near the net.
from susuki
Suzuki is pretty active on social media/star tennis academy. He's still fun to watch!
He teaches lessons on his RUclips channel called Star Tennis Academy. I watch it even though I don't speak one word of Japanese
Damn those courts were so fast. Now everything is slow like clay
I agree so boring no variety of speed in different surfaces even grass is slow ... ATP has made game one sided
@@understandinglife2481go watch live tennis and tell me if you actually think it’s “slow” You clowns can’t even hold a racket properly and think you are experts
@@understandinglife2481 Yes this surface was from the 90.ies made for players like Becker or Sampras. Maybe they made it for the local player that fast.
Suzuki’s hyper aggressive serve and volley game is what propelled Pistol Pete to his 14 Majors. Fed would incorporate this aggressive rushing the net play later in his career to great success.
Pete would come to the net after serve or an aggressive baseline shot, not a weak floating forehand chop like Suzuki. Also not the same athletic qualities. rushing to the net with weak shots doesnt cut it anymore, players come to the net to finish the points
Fed was always great at smashes (best smash ever) and volleys, but he played most of his youngers years from the baseline due to his big flat forehand being so capable of surpassing any defence
Thanks for highlighting this match. Never heard of it before. Tremendous play from Suzuki
Suzuki had such a nice motor⚡🔥
esto normalmente se borra e
In idiomatic english you would say he had a good engine.
鈴木選手、生涯最高の試合でしょうね。現役は引退されたけど日本のテニスの一時代を築いて下さいました、今はスタテニで楽しませて貰ってます😊。
I actually discovered Takao in the Star Tennis Academy youtube channel where he gives lessons.
Would love to see genuinely fast courts on tour again. For too long the courts have been slow medium, which has favoured certain players. Wimbledon always throws in surprises because of the nature of the surface
Its over man, resurrecting fast courts won't bring Federer back and that's pretty much the only reason you want them back lol
@@Emnesie idgaf abt federer. fast courts >>>>>>>> are simply the best
@@Emnesie what a donky hater comment. Go to sleep genius
Agree. Nowadays you can grind out every shit even on hard court
I think it's more the balls or rackets, personally. The ball just flies slower through the air in general today.
The best serve & volley net players of yesteryear - such as mr Suzuki here and Fed himself - do not mind if they get passed !
The really good ones simply improve placement and tactics as the match wears on
The modern game is downright boring by comparison to this
No comment?
I basically learned how to volley from his lessons on youtube
At first I thought it was their AO match with the outrageous around the net pass from Roger. Takao played out of his mind on that day and would have beaten anyone else. We don't see serve and volleys like this anymore.
Just visually looking at these courts you can clearly see how fast they are, unlike the abomination that we have today.