Supreme Court cases in the order they are talked about: Marbury v Madison 1:14 Plessy v Ferguson 4:07 Brown v Board of Education 5:52 In re' Gault 7:18 Tinker v Des Moines 8:59 Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 10:00 Gideon v Wainright 11:17 Miranda v Arizona 11:56 United States v Nixon 13:18 Bush v Gore 14:23 D.C. v Heller 15:41
I've already been arguing them to the Supreme Court and was invited to join the Supreme Court Bar Association. I am already a member of the American Bar Association. My children never did that.
@@MrRaymondSocialStudies I hope I don’t have to take the test multiple times. But when it’s time for me to do the math test I bet I’ll have to take it a lot as well.
@@Ssgmfs haha!! Yeah... I don't think they still do it... Anyway, welcome to the wonderful world of teaching! Best job in the world. Feel free to reach out anytime!
Hi Mr.Raymond I did the guided notes and watched the video I learned that if a law goes against the constitution the Supreme can declare it null and void.
I learned that Brown v. Board of Education overturned the verdict of Plessy v. Ferguson in relation to the 14th amendment. From "separate but equal" to "equal protection under the law."
Hi! I teach political science. This was a really great and helpful video, but I noticed a few mistakes. For Marbury v. Madison, I think you meant to say the Judiciary Act of 1789 instead of 1783. In addition, Plessy v. Ferguson was decided in 1896, not 1890. Also, the picture you had for Gault (about the obscene phone calls in the 1950s) actually features pictures of Eric Smith, the child murderer (from the 1990s), which could be confusing! Thank you again for the video.
Ugh yeah, this was when I first started making videos... and definitely should have done more proofreading of my slides... I'm going to have to remake them soon as the state is changing the standards these videos were made for... For now I'm teaching high school AP Gov and those videos definitely have the right dates :) Thanks for reaching out. Jeff Raymond
Sorry... Know this is probably too late... Most controversial aspect is that a federal/national court decided the procedures for a state election. Even for presidential or national political positions, states are the ones who decide the rules and procedures for holding elections. (The federal government has stepped in with voting laws.) Some people thought the Supreme Court, which overruled the Florida Supreme Court, should have stayed out of it.
Very interesting video. Thanks for making it. Just pointing out that "in re" does not mean "in reference to". Re is not an abbreviation or a truncation, and it needs no apostrophe. It is Latin for "thing" (lookup res). "In re" should be translated as "in the matter...".
Hi Mr Raymond, i did my guided notes and I learned that if a law goes against the constitution, the supreme court can declare it "null and void". The guided notes where TOOO long :(.
You said that in Heller v D.C., justices appointed by Republicans voted in favor of Heller and justices appointed by Democrats voted in favor of D.C.. John Paul Stevens (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President Gerald Ford and David Souter (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Other than that, it was a GREAT video.
I also learned that ernesto miranda's lawyers argued that he did not know that he had the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent (self incrimination).
hi im santiago gana i did the guided notes (not in coachs room) and i learned that if a law goes against the constitution the supreme court can declare it null and void
I learned how specific court cases had to do with certain amendments. For example: Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, and In re' Gault all had to do with the 14th Amendment.
Your history on Heller is incorrect. Both justices Souter and Stevens were Republicans. Justice J.P. Stevens was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Gerald Ford, a Republican. Stevens was from a branch of the Republican party that was called the Rockefeller Republicans. They were generally conservative on economic and foreign policy, but preferred that the party stay out of the social issues that defined the Goldwater/Reagan Republicans and those that came after them, and supporting civil rights when the Republican Party was turning against them. Justice Souter was nominated to the Supreme Court by President George Bush Sr., a Republican. He was seen as having a reputation as being tough at sentencing, but otherwise little was known about him outside of New Hampshire, which is probably what President Bush was looking for after the disasterous failed nomination of Robert Bork. He ended up being more in line with Stevens, voing on the liberal side on social and civil rights issues. Admittedly many members of the Republican party grew to regret these choices, but they were both Republicans when they joined the court, were both appointed by Republican Presidents, and both considered themselves lifelong Republicans.
I know someone pointed that out to me a while ago... So embarrasing... That's when I stopped freestyling videos and started writing scripts. I totally threw that comment in without even thinking about it. IDK why RUclips won't let me edit it out but...
Cyber criminals will do anything for information, and figure out new and layered ways to make money off it That includes your medical history, your information, your identity, and even how they go about being malicious with your identity
This is great. Its exactly what I need to study and I am so fortunate I came across it. Thank you.
+RIKKU AJ Glad you found it Rikku! Good luck! Jeff Raymond
Supreme Court cases in the order they are talked about:
Marbury v Madison 1:14
Plessy v Ferguson 4:07
Brown v Board of Education 5:52
In re' Gault 7:18
Tinker v Des Moines 8:59
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 10:00
Gideon v Wainright 11:17
Miranda v Arizona 11:56
United States v Nixon 13:18
Bush v Gore 14:23
D.C. v Heller 15:41
Nice Megan! Thanks!
OMG TTHANK YOUUUU 😁😁
You're a savior!
"Republican(?)Supreme Court elected Bush!🤔😉😏
Hell yeah, thank you very much 🙏
Im taking my FCLE tomorrow, and I was so confused about these cases! This video was such a great help, thank you so much!!
Thanks so much for saying so. So happy to hear! Mr Ray
seven years later and i’ve been assigned to watch this. to be honest as an autistic adhd kid this has kept my attention pretty great
fr
Who has to do this because of online school corona timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
yes ma’am
yeah same
Me 2... ugh!!
woooooooooooooooo
same
Your videos are perfect for PRE-Teaching, Remediation, and REVIEW. EXCELLENT! So glad you created them. You Rock!
Thanks so much!! Hope you are having a great year. I'm ready for summer break! :)
Sending thanks from FL :) These videos help me so much
Thanks so much from saying so! I'm FLA too. Miami... Happy holidays!
I've already been arguing them to the Supreme Court and was invited to join the Supreme Court Bar Association. I am already a member of the American Bar Association. My children never did that.
Thank you for taking the time to post this video. Needed it.
Thanks for saying so Anysia! I hope you are having a great year! Mr. Raymond
Thank you so much for your time to make this. This was soooo helpful ❤❤❤❤❤
You are so welcome! Thank you for commenting! Mr. Raymond
Awesome! I love these videos. Thanks so much for what you do.
Thanks so much for saying so Edward! Mr. Ray
y'all really disliking this video because your teacher sent you here😭
lmao
@@edwardelrock1485 AHAHA I FOUND YOU
@@ssagetastic woah,I watching these in 3/10/2021, its 6:55
@@ssagetastic you found me woah
omg it's a barb heyyy
wow this really helps alot! the Supreme Court cases were the things i struggled at. Thanks Mr. Raymond!
Thanks Bum Bum!! Hope you've had a great year!! Mr. Raymond
Wow thank you, I’m studying for my social studies teacher cert test and this was very helpful as a review!
Oh excellent!!! Glad they are helping!! I had to take the math test four times :(.... and I don't teach math!!
@@MrRaymondSocialStudies I hope I don’t have to take the test multiple times. But when it’s time for me to do the math test I bet I’ll have to take it a lot as well.
@@Ssgmfs haha!! Yeah... I don't think they still do it... Anyway, welcome to the wonderful world of teaching! Best job in the world. Feel free to reach out anytime!
Hi Mr.Raymond I did the guided notes and watched the video I learned that if a law goes against the constitution the Supreme can declare it null and void.
Omg I love history!!! ❤❤ 😊
Thank you!! now I know wayyyyyyyy more! I can do way better on my history test tomorrow
the video was interesting Mr Raymond i learn more about the supreme court landmark cases i all ready did the guided notes
Thank you. I appreciate this video
Thanks so much for saying so! Mr. Ray
thank you so much for this my teacher had given this to us and since i was gone almost the entire week we were learning this it was a great help.
You are so welcome! Thanks for saying so!! Mr. Raymond
I learned that Brown v. Board of Education overturned the verdict of Plessy v. Ferguson in relation to the 14th amendment. From "separate but equal" to "equal protection under the law."
Hi, Mr. Raymond! I learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault have in common is the 14th amendment
"Seperate but equal" means it legalized segregation
Hi Mr.Raymond what I learned is that a petition of writing of certiorari I'd filed when a Supreme Court asks to review a decision of a lower case.
4/9 justices must vote to hear a case
hi mr raymond i did the guided notes and i learned that if a law goes against the consitution the supreme court can declare it "null & void"
the fact this is still being used in history classes today 😂
And will be for a long time to come Raul!... You know... with new ones
this online school is killing me and I don't know how to breathe anymore
I know it's been tough!! hang in there! Almost there! Mr. Ray
Hi! I teach political science. This was a really great and helpful video, but I noticed a few mistakes. For Marbury v. Madison, I think you meant to say the Judiciary Act of 1789 instead of 1783. In addition, Plessy v. Ferguson was decided in 1896, not 1890. Also, the picture you had for Gault (about the obscene phone calls in the 1950s) actually features pictures of Eric Smith, the child murderer (from the 1990s), which could be confusing! Thank you again for the video.
Ugh yeah, this was when I first started making videos... and definitely should have done more proofreading of my slides... I'm going to have to remake them soon as the state is changing the standards these videos were made for... For now I'm teaching high school AP Gov and those videos definitely have the right dates :) Thanks for reaching out. Jeff Raymond
Thank you so much for this great video!
Thanks for the kind words Hyo! Hope you have great summer! Mr. Raymond
i learned how many supreme court justices there are
I am Abraham Rodriguez, from 5th period, i learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault have in common is the 14th amendment.
This video helps so much i'm so grateful i have a test next weekend about this and this video just helped me a lot
I hope you did well! Thanks for your kind words! Mr. Raymond
I learned that Brown vs the Board of Education overturned Plessy vs Ferguson by saying that separate but equal in schools is unconstitutional.
Judicial Review - The power to say whether any federal, state or local law or goverment action goes agains the constitution.
I learned that Judicial review is a major check on the other two branches!
How would you describe Bush vs. Gore? Will it be ok if I write “Split Supreme Court hands busy presidential victory”?
Sorry... Know this is probably too late... Most controversial aspect is that a federal/national court decided the procedures for a state election. Even for presidential or national political positions, states are the ones who decide the rules and procedures for holding elections. (The federal government has stepped in with voting laws.) Some people thought the Supreme Court, which overruled the Florida Supreme Court, should have stayed out of it.
I learned that most cases come to the supreme court under the argument of equal protection of the law.
Very interesting video. Thanks for making it.
Just pointing out that "in re" does not mean "in reference to". Re is not an abbreviation or a truncation, and it needs no apostrophe. It is Latin for "thing" (lookup res). "In re" should be translated as "in the matter...".
Wow, thanks, Daniele! Shows what my four years of Latin did for me!
I learned that 9 justices serve on the US Supreme Court
Good job Max
Thank you I was just watching it for fun lol it's been 2 years since the AP exam
Ha, thanks Basszilda!! I'm sure you did great on the exam! Happy holidays!! Mr. Raymond
i learn that i won't give up on my dream!
thanks to u i will become an FBI
Congrats!! Go for it!!!
mr raymond is the goat
Thanks Franklin! Back at ya! Mr. Raymond
hi mr Raymond if a law goes against the constitution the supreme can declare it null and void
Hi Mr Raymond, i did my guided notes and I learned that if a law goes against the constitution, the supreme court can declare it "null and void". The guided notes where TOOO long :(.
Thanks for this review truly a godsend 🙏
Thanks so much for saying so!!
I learned that if a law is unconstitutional, the supreme court can then declare it "null & void"
You said that in Heller v D.C., justices appointed by Republicans voted in favor of Heller and justices appointed by Democrats voted in favor of D.C.. John Paul Stevens (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President Gerald Ford and David Souter (voted in favor of D.C.) was appointed by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Other than that, it was a GREAT video.
Good catch Jessie. I realized after that I hadn't fact checked that and was just stupidly speaking off the cuff! Thanks for the feedback! Mr. Raymond
I learned that in Tinker vs. Des Moines, speech is more than just words. Watched it
I have a big civics test today! Wish me luck :p
Hope you did well Micah!
my teacher just sent me this and it helped me a lot
Thanks for the kind words Yoel! Hope you have great summer! Mr. Raymond
I learned that Supreme Court justices serve for life
who is else is watching this for there civics teacher :/
Me
Me sadly
thank you for this video i really needed this
Thanks for saying so!!! I hope you are having a great year!! Mr. Raymond
no thank you
Hi Mr Raymond I'm Marco and I learned that the president makes justices and the Senate approves them
anyone got the answers?????
Jayden, you are always looking for the answers (insert laughing emoji... how do you add emoji's to RUclips comments... ok boomer)
I learned that if a law is or goes AGAINST the constitution the supreme court has the power to declare it as "null or void"
hi mr raymond i did the guided notes and i learned that the president chooses justices and the senate confirms them
thank you mr raymond, very cool
Thanks so much for saying so! Mr. Ray
THANK YOU!!!
Thank you for thanking me, Daniel! I hope you are having a great year! Mr. Raymond
I learned the power of judicial review
I learned that the plessy vs. ferguson had the 14th amendment in commoen. I did the guided notes.
I also learned that ernesto miranda's lawyers argued that he did not know that he had the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent (self incrimination).
hi im santiago gana i did the guided notes (not in coachs room) and i learned that if a law goes against the constitution the supreme court can declare it null and void
i did my guided notes and I learned that if a law goes against the constitution, the supreme court can declare it null and void
I learned that the Supreme Court has to have a unanimous decision to hear a case
I learned there are 9 supreme court justices and they serve for life.
hi Mr Raymond I watched the video and did the guided notes
I learned how specific court cases had to do with certain amendments. For example: Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, and In re' Gault all had to do with the 14th Amendment.
7:17
I learned that Plessy, Brown, and Gault all have the 14th amendment in common
I did it Mr. Raymond and I learned that the president chooses justices and the senate confirms them.
Useful video never seen before
Thanks so much for your kind words!
who's doing Mrs seiverts guided notes last minute
I did the guided notes I learned that if law goes against the constitution the Supreme Court can declare it null and void
hi mr.raymond saw your awsome video and i learned that
bush v gore and u.s v nixion were ruling on the exsecutive branch
Subscribed!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks Yailin! Mr. Raymond
i learned what dc vs keller was, allowed everyone to carry guns for self defense; I'm emailing you the Guided notes
thanks for the video
my civics eoc is the 16 and this helped
+Shantelly R Thanks for saying so Shantelly!! Good luck. You're going to do great!! Mr. Raymond
Why is it that Family Courts don't honor any of these? Such deceit to the public!
Please explain?
hi mr raymond its frank. I learned that brown v board of education extended 14 amendment guarantee of equal protecction under the law
I got my 3rd quarter civics test tom,im nervous,shout out to those whos watching this in 3/10/2021 or 2021
I hope you did well!! Have a great summer! Mr. Raymond
2020?
2020!
i learned that judicial review is the judicial branches biggest check on the legislative and and executive branches
I watched i did it in mrs. D the judicial branch has a check on executive and legislative
Hey mr Raymond I saw your video. I learned the heller vs D.C. Was a win for the 2nd amendment
I learned that Miranda did not know that he had the right to remain silent in Miranda vs. Arizona.
i watched the video and did the guided notes, i learned that the supreme court has 9 justices.
Your history on Heller is incorrect. Both justices Souter and Stevens were Republicans.
Justice J.P. Stevens was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Gerald Ford, a Republican. Stevens was from a branch of the Republican party that was called the Rockefeller Republicans. They were generally conservative on economic and foreign policy, but preferred that the party stay out of the social issues that defined the Goldwater/Reagan Republicans and those that came after them, and supporting civil rights when the Republican Party was turning against them.
Justice Souter was nominated to the Supreme Court by President George Bush Sr., a Republican. He was seen as having a reputation as being tough at sentencing, but otherwise little was known about him outside of New Hampshire, which is probably what President Bush was looking for after the disasterous failed nomination of Robert Bork. He ended up being more in line with Stevens, voing on the liberal side on social and civil rights issues.
Admittedly many members of the Republican party grew to regret these choices, but they were both Republicans when they joined the court, were both appointed by Republican Presidents, and both considered themselves lifelong Republicans.
I know someone pointed that out to me a while ago... So embarrasing... That's when I stopped freestyling videos and started writing scripts. I totally threw that comment in without even thinking about it. IDK why RUclips won't let me edit it out but...
I learned that judicial review is the power to say whether a law or government action goes against the constitution.
Good job Alejandra!! Be safe tomorrow!! Mr. Ray
I did the guided notes and i learned that if a law goes against the constitution the supreme can declare it null and void.
Wow Santi, look at you!
great video my guy
Here in Richgrove
Cyber criminals will do anything for information, and figure out new and layered ways to make money off it
That includes your medical history, your information, your identity, and even how they go about being malicious with your identity
I learned that the plessy vs. ferguson had the 14th amendment in common
I learned that the President appoints Supreme Court Justices and the Senate approves them.
Hold up. U skipped Bush v Gore. That's the good stuff man lol
I know... They took it off the exam. I used to teach it. It is a good one!
I learned that the amendment that Plessy, Brown and Gault, all have in common is the 14th amendment.
You didn't include Roe vs Wade?
Next one
I learned that Plessy vs Ferguson and Brown vs Board of Education helped establish the 14tg amendment