1:15:58 How the fuck would Donald Trump govern right now? Thankfully, he's not in government. I hope he never is again. I knew Jen was a statist but hearing her wishing that Trump were part of the state is bizarre.
12:35 I'm trying to imagine what a disambiguated dog would be like. I guess he'd be very clear on what terms mean, though unable to communicate that fact because he's a dog and unable to speak human. Perhaps Heaton meant that Wallace was discombobulated?
Disagree with your takes on J6 and some other stuff, good to get another perspective regardless. So tempted to do the research to try to prove your positions wrong (or correct even), but that also seems like a waste of time.
You could probably do worse than listening to Jen's episode of Congressional Dish 'Contriving January 6th' as a starter. The sources that she cites in that episode would be a good springboard to fact-check from.
Not sure you can disprove her position on this. Everything was based on fact; the fact being everyone is being honest except #45. Oh and the hearsay . She is right though ain’t nobody talking bout the important parts of that. Sent me down a rabbit hole.
Kind of aggravating to see Justin squirm around the fact that Trump straight up lied about the Kemp-Biden dialogue. I love that Jen pressed 'its a lie'. I appreciate the moderation in this panel and the focus on issues, and largely all of them bring a very fresh perspective. However, it does feel glaring that whenever Trump demonstrable is a piece of shit Justin seems to devil's advocate him to the point of not being able to say 'Yeah, its a lie.' I understand being contentious and offering a perspective is part of having an engaging show and not just be a circle of 'yes we agree', however, I also feel that at some points its perfectly okay to agree and say 'yeah, he lied. And its not doing him or the people any good.' It feels consistently dodgy and Trump-apologist the way it gets ran around sometimes. Again though, as a new viewer, love the actual engagement on the issues and push for politicians to speak to us as if we understand nuance. Definitely my favorite political discussion I've consistently seen.
Cajun Navy's hurricane response and HEB responded faster than FEMA when hurricane harvey hit Texas 1:16:41
Jen carrying water for a terrible disaster response by the Feds is not shocking to me
32:46 - Jen saying there is spin on something Heaton says. Lol that is rich coming from her.
46:30 Of course Jen liked the moderators.
24:19 Jen is baffling. She's against free trade and against Trump and Vance. BTW, I think they're all wrong.
All 3 of them? What’s your hot take?
23:45, southern Heaton made one of his fleeting appearances 🎊
So Jen's "red line" is that she's pro-life? 1:24:18
That's quite a heal-turn.
34:16 I've never been happier that Jen has no home. BTW, I don't either, but for different reasons.
I like all versions of Heaton too, especially the Mirror Universe version
The recent stopping the steal documentary was very good.
1:25:35 Heaton's right. We are at war with Ukraine. Perhaps a Freudian slip?
The federal lands home building is mostly for Nevada, reno, vegas, elko and carson city cant expand because of federal land primarily blm
13:12 That's easy. Trump's trade policy is "MOAR TARRIFFS."
Exactly. It’s about nonstop conflict.
1:15:58 How the fuck would Donald Trump govern right now? Thankfully, he's not in government. I hope he never is again. I knew Jen was a statist but hearing her wishing that Trump were part of the state is bizarre.
12:35 I'm trying to imagine what a disambiguated dog would be like. I guess he'd be very clear on what terms mean, though unable to communicate that fact because he's a dog and unable to speak human. Perhaps Heaton meant that Wallace was discombobulated?
Trump/Vance/Gabbard/RFK 2024
Disagree with your takes on J6 and some other stuff, good to get another perspective regardless. So tempted to do the research to try to prove your positions wrong (or correct even), but that also seems like a waste of time.
You could probably do worse than listening to Jen's episode of Congressional Dish 'Contriving January 6th' as a starter. The sources that she cites in that episode would be a good springboard to fact-check from.
Not sure you can disprove her position on this. Everything was based on fact; the fact being everyone is being honest except #45. Oh and the hearsay . She is right though ain’t nobody talking bout the important parts of that. Sent me down a rabbit hole.
I didn't know I had a Red Line until we became complicit in genocide 🤷
Kind of aggravating to see Justin squirm around the fact that Trump straight up lied about the Kemp-Biden dialogue. I love that Jen pressed 'its a lie'. I appreciate the moderation in this panel and the focus on issues, and largely all of them bring a very fresh perspective. However, it does feel glaring that whenever Trump demonstrable is a piece of shit Justin seems to devil's advocate him to the point of not being able to say 'Yeah, its a lie.'
I understand being contentious and offering a perspective is part of having an engaging show and not just be a circle of 'yes we agree', however, I also feel that at some points its perfectly okay to agree and say 'yeah, he lied. And its not doing him or the people any good.' It feels consistently dodgy and Trump-apologist the way it gets ran around sometimes.
Again though, as a new viewer, love the actual engagement on the issues and push for politicians to speak to us as if we understand nuance. Definitely my favorite political discussion I've consistently seen.