✅ Want to see how to grow your dividend portfolio to $1000 a month cash flow? Check out this video next ruclips.net/video/np_1JN22Z5s/видео.htmlsi=sCPnJRs-0jkpQQBn
Buffett did not go dump most of his money in a stock. He bought a ton of Apple mid 2000-2010 and it ballooned in value. He owns so many shares from its multiple splits he makes a fortune from the tiny Apple dividend
You need to be careful with dividend kings and Aristocrats. Many of the prices erode over time. For instance, over the last 5 years 3M (MMM) dropped from $182.67 to $91.40 today a 50% drop. FMC dropped 50% in the last 5 months from $131.52 to $62.18.
@@jeffaragon No they did not cut the dividend. However, lets use MMM as an example. If you bought the stock 5 years ago for $182.67 you would have received est $6.00 per year in dividends x 5 years for a total of $30.00. But, you would have lost $91.27 in stock value per share. So now if the stock doesn't go down in price any further it will take ($91.27 / $6.00) = 15 years to be back to even.
@Daimajin696: Don’t try to make rational arguments to these dividend zealots. As long as their little dividend remains they don’t care about massive losses in value. But, when the dividend does get cut, tears start falling when it’s time to sell.
MMM is a unique scenario. They are paying out big lawsuits, so that will affect earnings. But you should also consider what are the gains over the long term, so maybe it’s opportunistic to pick this up at a discount. Also, if you did hold MMM before the spinoff, you were rewarded with shares from SOLV.
People who sre dividend investors do it for the cash flow not total return. Many have owned decades before covid so their cost averaged are alot lower. You shouldn't be buying ATH either.
I've been eye balling a couple tech stocks and APPL for a while now. I own no energy stocks in my portfolio and I want to make that addition to my portfolio or is too late? i currently plan to budget about 500k in savings lying waste to inflation.
I find it more productive and safe to buy growth/blue-chip stocks rather than tech stocks. However, It's advisable to work with a fiduciary advisor for well-diversified portfolios instead of relying solely on speculations.
Exactly, a good number of people discredit the effectiveness of financial advisor, but over the past 3years, I’ve had a financial advisor consistently restructure and diversify my portfolio/expenses and I’ve made over $1million in gains… might not be a lot but i'm financially secure and that's great!
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up after scrolling a bit. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her. Once again many thanks.
i don't quite understand the motivation to invest in a company that gives a 9% yearly dividend yield and at the same time it's stock loses 9.2% of it's price in that same year. You are practically lending them money to return it to you over the course of a year without interest meanwhile you are actually loosing the value of your investment from inflation. Same thing with most of those high dividend yield companies.... stock prices falling over the years approximately at the same rate the dividends are rising, not really smart investing in my opinion unless you have big reasons to believe something will change regarding their stock price.
Bs 3.2 %? Really, even with adding 6% it only a return of 9.2 Oxlc is paying 18+% , it pays 94 cents per share yearly. But the cost per share is only 5.10 a share so for the cost of 1 share of coke you gey 11 shares of oxlc. That means 11x 94 cents a year Oh and I forgot to mention , It pays out monthly which means if you reinvest your dividends you can increase that 18 % to about 20%. Those are numbers not found since enron times lol which mean you can double you money in 5 years without ever having to sell any stocks or pay any fees for selling them or buying them back
@@ogierthedane6025 400% in dividends over 15 years more than offsets NAV loss. That being said I avoided it because I didnt like the financials. I admit I was wrong in my analysis. It paid off for those that were in it.
You really believe you'll get a 20% total annual return with OCLC? That would be a unicorn 🦄. Wall Street would jump on this an bid up the share price. This is Warren Buffett's average return. You must be new to investing.
@hansschotterradler3772 it's oxlc not.oclc But to your point, the difference being I have have owned the stock for almost a year and I have been collecting dividends every. Month. Now you can follow buffet. But I bet you don't get his return do you? Because your following , so by the time your mo ey buys the stock the price has changed from WHaT he got it at right? Also he is buying and trading which means he doesn't realize his return u til the stock is sold correct? I on the other hand just have to check the market every few days Tomales sure my auto orders haven't triggered the sale of the stock ( like if the stock dropped an insane amount in a day like over 12 % ) I. Which case I do lose 30 days of dividend income but I can buy the stock back at a lower cost. Also note dividends are announced at least a month in advance , so there are no sudden changes that will effect my income . If the dividend is reduced , fine I can them sell . BTW if you look at the stock over the last year you o lying see 3 relatively large spikes only one was downward, the other 2 were upward. . But hey of your fine with thinking that there is less risk with a company that has been around longer and fine with not maximizing you return on investment and are fine with having to check the stock hourly or waiting to get paid something, go ahead , you do you . But don't pretend that it's the best, most profitable way to go. Because it isn't. What it is is an attempt to mitigate risks at the costs of dividend returns. What it is is also showing a bias in market cap stocks.
✅ Want to see how to grow your dividend portfolio to $1000 a month cash flow? Check out this video next ruclips.net/video/np_1JN22Z5s/видео.htmlsi=sCPnJRs-0jkpQQBn
Buffett did not go dump most of his money in a stock. He bought a ton of Apple mid 2000-2010 and it ballooned in value. He owns so many shares from its multiple splits he makes a fortune from the tiny Apple dividend
You need to be careful with dividend kings and Aristocrats. Many of the prices erode over time. For instance, over the last 5 years 3M (MMM) dropped from $182.67 to $91.40 today a 50% drop. FMC dropped 50% in the last 5 months from $131.52 to $62.18.
OK but did they cut the dividend because most people invest in dividend kings for the consistency of the dividend
@@jeffaragon No they did not cut the dividend. However, lets use MMM as an example. If you bought the stock 5 years ago for $182.67 you would have received est $6.00 per year in dividends x 5 years for a total of $30.00. But, you would have lost $91.27 in stock value per share. So now if the stock doesn't go down in price any further it will take ($91.27 / $6.00) = 15 years to be back to even.
@Daimajin696: Don’t try to make rational arguments to these dividend zealots. As long as their little dividend remains they don’t care about massive losses in value. But, when the dividend does get cut, tears start falling when it’s time to sell.
MMM is a unique scenario. They are paying out big lawsuits, so that will affect earnings. But you should also consider what are the gains over the long term, so maybe it’s opportunistic to pick this up at a discount. Also, if you did hold MMM before the spinoff, you were rewarded with shares from SOLV.
People who sre dividend investors do it for the cash flow not total return.
Many have owned decades before covid so their cost averaged are alot lower.
You shouldn't be buying ATH either.
MO what a beast
BRK owns KO & Davita !..........what a wonderful Profit Loop !
You're getting exited about 3.2% interest?
My shares in ITW are up 60% in less than 4 years. They aren't sitting at value pricing atm for sure.
PNNT is a good dividend stock? Please advise...
I've been eye balling a couple tech stocks and APPL for a while now. I own no energy stocks in my portfolio and I want to make that addition to my portfolio or is too late? i currently plan to budget about 500k in savings lying waste to inflation.
I find it more productive and safe to buy growth/blue-chip stocks rather than tech stocks. However, It's advisable to work with a fiduciary advisor for well-diversified portfolios instead of relying solely on speculations.
Exactly, a good number of people discredit the effectiveness of financial advisor, but over the past 3years, I’ve had a financial advisor consistently restructure and diversify my portfolio/expenses and I’ve made over $1million in gains… might not be a lot but i'm financially secure and that's great!
@@mariaguerrero08Mind if I ask you to recommend this particular coach you using their service?
'Gertrude Margaret Quinto' maintains an online presence. Just make a simple search for her name online.
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up after scrolling a bit. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her. Once again many thanks.
Good info for the watchlist 👍🏼
Thoughts on GPIX and GPIQ? Goldman Sachs
NWN has been a long term underperformer - what's going on with them? And the payout ratio is not low, in the mid 70"% range.
@josephhogue does the spread sheet track dividends also?
No sorry. Have been working on an upgrade but really hard to code in.
No worries. I'll pick it up anyway. Hopefully it will be an update. I just bought your options course. Can't wait to dive in!
Just follow warren buffet stocks and youll be fine.
Fine is one thing, but best off is another
Is there a reason my posts keep getting deleted?
What website you recommend to find stocks that is not traded publicly....yet
Crunchbase is the go-to for private company data
went through artisocrates vid, now on dividend kings, next up, dividend zombies (paying for 100yr's plus)
Altria Tobacco, 4LIFE🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬
For a while I was wondering why you kept saying 'Botai nation'
Best dividends of all are lousy performing stocks
DVN stable and consistent payer 🤔
i don't quite understand the motivation to invest in a company that gives a 9% yearly dividend yield and at the same time it's stock loses 9.2% of it's price in that same year. You are practically lending them money to return it to you over the course of a year without interest meanwhile you are actually loosing the value of your investment from inflation. Same thing with most of those high dividend yield companies.... stock prices falling over the years approximately at the same rate the dividends are rising, not really smart investing in my opinion unless you have big reasons to believe something will change regarding their stock price.
Bs 3.2 %? Really, even with adding 6% it only a return of 9.2
Oxlc is paying 18+% , it pays 94 cents per share yearly.
But the cost per share is only 5.10 a share so for the cost of 1 share of coke you gey 11 shares of oxlc. That means 11x 94 cents a year
Oh and I forgot to mention ,
It pays out monthly which means if you reinvest your dividends you can increase that 18 % to about 20%.
Those are numbers not found since enron times lol which mean you can double you money in 5 years without ever having to sell any stocks or pay any fees for selling them or buying them back
OXLC have lost 75% of its value since it went public, good luck with this.
@@ogierthedane6025 400% in dividends over 15 years more than offsets NAV loss. That being said I avoided it because I didnt like the financials. I admit I was wrong in my analysis. It paid off for those that were in it.
You really believe you'll get a 20% total annual return with OCLC? That would be a unicorn 🦄. Wall Street would jump on this an bid up the share price. This is Warren Buffett's average return. You must be new to investing.
@hansschotterradler3772 it's oxlc not.oclc
But to your point, the difference being I have have owned the stock for almost a year and I have been collecting dividends every. Month.
Now you can follow buffet. But I bet you don't get his return do you? Because your following , so by the time your mo ey buys the stock the price has changed from WHaT he got it at right? Also he is buying and trading which means he doesn't realize his return u til the stock is sold correct?
I on the other hand just have to check the market every few days Tomales sure my auto orders haven't triggered the sale of the stock ( like if the stock dropped an insane amount in a day like over 12 % ) I. Which case I do lose 30 days of dividend income but I can buy the stock back at a lower cost.
Also note dividends are announced at least a month in advance , so there are no sudden changes that will effect my income . If the dividend is reduced , fine I can them sell .
BTW if you look at the stock over the last year you o lying see 3 relatively large spikes only one was downward, the other 2 were upward. .
But hey of your fine with thinking that there is less risk with a company that has been around longer and fine with not maximizing you return on investment and are fine with having to check the stock hourly or waiting to get paid something, go ahead , you do you .
But don't pretend that it's the best, most profitable way to go.
Because it isn't.
What it is is an attempt to mitigate risks at the costs of dividend returns. What it is is also showing a bias in market cap stocks.
@@ogierthedane6025 Thats how many of them work. I am not a fan but it did pay off for investors.
I want to watch these but that constant whispering is too much
4.9 ? PASS I GET THAT SHEET SETTING IN CASH ! NEXT