What most of you seem to forget is that, in the original 94/5 production, Hyde was also a projection with pre-recorded vocals. Jekyll would turn his back to the audience during Hyde's lines to grab a breather. Do I like the concept of the one man switcheroo? Yeah, it can look great if performed/timed well. Do I think this version fit the metal aesthetic of the production and should be judged on its own merits? Absolutely.
"What most of you seem to forget is that, in the original 94/5 production, Hyde was also a projection with pre-recorded vocals" that was during the Pre-Broadway engagements / tour. When it premiered on Broadway itself, I believe they did it with Robert Cuccioli switching back and forth between Jekyll and Hyde without projection and prerecorded vocals.
I love how he looks so scared and hysterical and feverish! It fits him so well in here! And he also has an amazing singing voice! I somehow like this version really much, but there's something very off with the lyrics...
To anyone saying this version takes away the fun of seeing an actor change seamlessly between roles, you're not wrong. What it does add however is the freedom to play with the timing a little more. You can play around with Jeyll's cries even when Hyde is screaming. Watch the way Constantine falls to the ground and screams and cries in agony while his hyde is standing over him. That's something you just can't do with the other version
I agree but in the other version the actor still can embody what both characters are going trough as they portray each side. To me that’s more interesting. Anything timing wise that can be gained in this version seems to be thrown away by too much going on.
Let's not forget .... This is how it was originally. No cheesy explosions and flying bats etc... But Hyde pre recorded in the mirror. The tour with Bob Cuccioli did that before Broadway. 1997 Broadway invented the cheesy flipping back and forth... And now we feel cheated that this went back.
@@tannerlevasseur2640 not necessarily. With the “flipping back and forth” we’re seeing the effects of the internal, not the internal itself. This version shows us that in a more grandiose albeit chaotic method.
I absolutely love this version and here's why; in the original version the actor switches back and forth between the two characters, illustrating their split personalities and showing off the actor's ability to transition between the two seamlessly. However, that's only if it is done right. With the traditional method, actors run the risk of playing it disingenuously and what should have been a suspenseful and heart-wrenching moment for the audience, turns into a dull cliche, or worse, comedic. This version however, shows the internal struggle Jekyll faces by shifting the perspective from outside to inside his mind. Look at the digital effects. The images of shattered glass, fire, eyes fixed on Jekyll while a demonic Hyde menacingly looms over him are symbolic. What better way to illustrate the chaotic state of Jekyll's tortured mind?
I couldn't agree more! If you search an animatic of this song, they show Jekyll's internal struggle to free himself from Hyde. This version gives of those vibes that does the some justice!
@@mrseddiediaz I see you’re obviously a big fan of Constantine, and that’s great :) Nothing wrong with him as a singer/performer himself, it’s just I’m more married to the original vision and take on this musical and number. To each his own!
Music is pretty good, but this scene was hilariously blocked/executed. This looks silly. It's too much. The original one man duet was much more powerful.
I actually liked this style. You cannot compare it to the original, for it is completely restyled. For the metalized version it intended to be, i think it was pretty successful and haunting.
Yeah, and I like how they distorted Hyde's voice in certain areas to make it sound demonic. They even made it look demonic with some awesome special effects. Which I think is super cool.
how did they do the hyde effect with him in the mirror when Jekyll is standing on the stage dressed completely different? pre recorded video? its sooo cool!
Something that I would like to see, because I would love to be a Broadway director/scriptwriter when I graduate college, is if they had the mirror like this version but Hyde would only show up when Jekyll was looking directly into it. And they sort of did the same thing with the one-man-fight in the original broadway run. They would have to position the mirror at a certain angle and make it pretty big but I think it would be fascinating to see a Jekyll and Hyde fight in one man's body like how they initially were, but make it look like two different people from the audience's perspective. Almost like they're directly looking at each other, which is the mirror, but really Jekyll is just looking back at himself and he sees Hyde.
That sounds absolutely awesome and I'd so love to see it! I can imagine Jekyll walking back and forth past it in the first bit of the song not noticing it until Hyde starts singing-
the one thing I like most about this version is the general idea behind it... Instead of having it be a physical back and forth like how it is more traditionally done, this really makes it more of a mental battle... We're seeing what is going on inside of his head as he's fighting with Hyde. Hyde is trying to claw his way out, and Henry is pushing back, and we're seeing that mental struggle Henry is having (live on the stage) with Hyde in his mind, trying to keep his hold over Henry.
About everybody talking about the one or two actor version of the song, i want to give my vision about it. One actor - I thing it's powerful, and you can see how the pain and agony jekyll show during the transformation, as he's quickly becomes hyde, it's good, and its very important to the show. Two actors/pre recorded - I thing this role thing have such more power, like you are now deep into the jekyll and hyde universe, and you know see the show like the two characters see as well, you watch jekyll looking at hyde its a powerful and very significant thing, you are seeing just like the characters is seeing, and this can be such a powerful meaning in this show. Well, that's my opinion, i love the both
I was definitely blown away by the visuals, but it still doesn't make up for the magic that was seeing an actor portray two roles as once in the same song. There's just something about that that no special effects would be able to top. And let's be honest, I think we can all agree that the reverb effect at the end was a little much.
I know this production is controversial but I like it- I'd also like to point out that though it appears to be a mirror, before Hyde shows up it's a portrait, very Dorian grey-
I must say the screen effects are awesome. it perfectly portrays the struggle. However I think Constantine is a great singer and rocker but the role of Dr. Jeckell and Hyde is completely misinterpreted and should in my opinion not be that rocky but more classical Rob evan's voice is better suited
Absolutely ridiculous. I think most of us who love Jekyll & Hyde can agree that it is a pretty silly show, but playing "Confrontation" in this style completely robs the show of one of it's highlights - seeing an actor believably switch between both personalities. The special effects lighting that served the show so well during "Transformation" is so over-the-top it drains away any power the song is supposed to have. Constantine has a fine voice, and can belt if you allow him to (and even if he couldn't do that, he's still better than Hasselhoff), so why cut the legs out from under a good performer? I don't get it. Still, this show tends to get rebooted every ten years or so... thus I look forward to the 2025 production of Jekyll & Hyde starring Jaden Smith.
Matthew Rios i like jekyll and hyde but you have no grounds to say this is bad i,m sick and tired of people saying these singers are bad when they have no proof to back up they,er claims
@@lowtiershadowyt9008 what I believe they're saying is that this version of the song is absolutely ridiculous and silly And also, it just isn't as good compared to my man Cuccioli, because it doesn't show the internal battle within Jekyll with Hyde
I don’t like this very much, but I will say one thing I appreciate: it gives a reason for the song to end: he takes the “antidote”. Most other versions have Jekyll winning just, because. Still a bad production overall, but I love the little details peppered in
At first I was disappointed that he wasn't switching back and forth, but I get why they did it this way - to make it look like this is all in his mind - Hyde is taking over Jekyll who is trying to keep it together...
I need to know how people do not see this as an internal battle? A mirror is a symbol for the reflection of who somebody is. This is a perfect way to represent a 'confrontation' between his outer more "normal" self and his inner dark personality. It is still internalized because he is speaking to his own reflection. He isn't fighting with another 3 dimensional being 🤷♂️ it also gives the actor a chance to actually breathe on stage... we can't have them run out of breath during a performance now can we? 😅 however, it is not negating or going against the other way of performing this song, which can be just as effective if done right with a lot of talent... I think that both ways are both incredible and no one should dislike the one way just because the other way is the version you're used to 🤷♂️ also it's nice to see a change and someone trying something different for once because a copy of something else can get quite boring 🙈
Oh wow. This was absolutely NOT my style. It's interesting how they switched from the one person switching between Hyde and Jekyll to background motion and Jekyll. The background thing is not really bad. And it makes it a lot easier for the performer! Buuut. Of course it's hard to portray Jekyll's struggle this way. Well. After I heared Anthony Warlow's version it's really hard to compete with the master. But we have to add, that Anthony did only the concept recording( as far as I know) and they were able to cut. Which is not possible live. Still we have to give Constantine credit! Jekyll/Hyde is a really hard character to play and I think he did well. BUT still I don't like it.
Yeah...the original way it was done may have involved a video/mirror like this, but the song is really much more effective by doing it simply with one actor live onstage. As Cuccioli proved, great acting is more exciting than any (cheesy-looking) technology.
I hate how you guys are bashing on him for all this stuff he's not perfect guys.. yes I mean there may be stuff he could have improved on but that doesn't give you a right to say straight up he did bad.. I just saw the full musical On here and I actually thought he did fine.. if your gonna bash me now for saying this don't bother saying anything at all...
It's just lazy and not doing justice to the characters without singing both parts, Constantine is a good singer but it was a terrible choice to make it separate
It's way too much, the phrase "quality over quantity" doesn't exist for no reason. I like the screen idea and the demonic tone Hyde gets, but the explosions were too much
Really cool. I think some parts could use some work but some of his interpretations are really good. Is this the one that was directed by Robert Cuccioli, the original broadway actor?
Seeing this I sigh and wonder what has gone on with people's minds. While I am glad this amazing play has been revised, I don't like this. I understand the modern effect but personally I prefer the switching back and forth. It really shows Henry's struggle to with hyde. I love the set and how they put it up but it may have been a little too much. This is just strictly my personal opinion. Too much rock. While I understand the voices it was a little distracting from the duet. I don't really like the actor. Brent Ramirez did a lot better. If he, or any other actor, did it, it might be better. I think they just need to go back to the drawing board and rethink a few things first.
I’ll say this now, I do not like this version, I feel like I’ve lost all the creepiness I felt with the original, but does not mean this guy is any less talented, like, dang!
This would be okay if it was a CD only thing like "Nightmare Revisited" , but not a thing that would be in Broadway. So, I will remember this version as like a remix from a band or something.
I like this. The effects and visuals are cool. However, there was something special about seeing one guy duet with himself; it took a really good performer to pull that off. This actually makes the song rather unimpressive That said, the distorted voice was really creepy and this was definitely a mindfuck, which I presume was what they were going for.
It’s still not as powerful when the person playing Jekyll and Hyde doesn’t sing both parts live, but still an amazing technical masterpiece the way that they did it.
shadow strike speaking of lyric changes, did you see the video of Michael Crawford's last Phantom performance with Dale Kristien? he changes one lyric of one of the songs as well
Go to the channel of the bigot shadow strike, and it is in his about. You can find him in the comments of any Jekyll/Hyde video. North Bridge posted links to his unlisted version. Hope this helps!
Saw the original on Broadway in the 90's and this horror show of a remake. This was possibly the "wurst" performance of what WAS a spectacular Broadway show. Two thumbs down and a clothespin for your nose for this stinker of a remake.
I'll be honest, this isn't my favorite. I don't particularly like the rock aspects of it, and I think an important part of Jekyll and Hyde is being able to portray the two characters without prior recording, but that's all personal opinon (of course).
This might be the worst performance of this role I’ve ever seen...I fucking hate it with the rock voice...it’s supposed to be broadway, not an AC/DC concert
This Confrontation is pretty much Eminem's My Darling in a nutshell. The song as it was is already pretty similar, now the scenery is matching up with the lyrics. It's pretty cool.
Amy La Rue Good rebuttal. My favorite part was how you said the things that were good about this clip. Listen, that's cool that you're a Constantine fan. And by all means, cheer him on. Objectively, this is bad theatre.
for those of you who are small minded and have no sense of vision with this version of the musical let me explain constantine brought a new energy to the play and it works the metal parts of the play are here for a reason as jekyll he is more close to the original but as hyde he embraces the metal aspect of his role . i believe Constantine has outplayed everyone , now that can be to much but lets be honest here who has the right to say whats good and whats bad just accept what we are given and move on . i can see people hate this cause its something new
+shadow strike This is a musical, not an AC/DC concert, besides this guy is a ripoff of AC/DC, hell they could probably pull this song off better than he did.
"Who has the right to say what's good and what's bad" Sure, does that mean you'll stop shitting all over Warlow's performance? Or does it only apply to the things YOU like?
Ok, watched the whole thing, the mirror thing was cool, I liked Murder, Murder, but it didn't feel right. The mix up of when some of the songs were did that.
+Bill Angell Where did you find a recording? I have always wanted to watch this version since I heard of it but they stopped the shows before I could see it in person.
Well jokes on you since Anthony Warlow will be reprising the role for the 25th anniversary. And other actors managed to do Jekyll's burden of Mr Hyde in a way that the audience could possibly take it seriously unlike this joke of a performance.
Nope. David Hasselhoff and all before him did this number so much better. Hyde is the evil of a man. I want to see the struggle not a screen. My comment has nothing to do with this actor but the design is very disappointing.
What most of you seem to forget is that, in the original 94/5 production, Hyde was also a projection with pre-recorded vocals. Jekyll would turn his back to the audience during Hyde's lines to grab a breather.
Do I like the concept of the one man switcheroo? Yeah, it can look great if performed/timed well.
Do I think this version fit the metal aesthetic of the production and should be judged on its own merits? Absolutely.
Well, in the very original world premiere production from 1990 they actually had another actor playing Hyde from behind a one-way mirror!
"What most of you seem to forget is that, in the original 94/5 production, Hyde was also a projection with pre-recorded vocals" that was during the Pre-Broadway engagements / tour. When it premiered on Broadway itself, I believe they did it with Robert Cuccioli switching back and forth between Jekyll and Hyde without projection and prerecorded vocals.
I love how he looks so scared and hysterical and feverish! It fits him so well in here! And he also has an amazing singing voice! I somehow like this version really much, but there's something very off with the lyrics...
they changed it to fit this particular version I guess
To anyone saying this version takes away the fun of seeing an actor change seamlessly between roles, you're not wrong. What it does add however is the freedom to play with the timing a little more. You can play around with Jeyll's cries even when Hyde is screaming. Watch the way Constantine falls to the ground and screams and cries in agony while his hyde is standing over him. That's something you just can't do with the other version
I agree but in the other version the actor still can embody what both characters are going trough as they portray each side. To me that’s more interesting. Anything timing wise that can be gained in this version seems to be thrown away by too much going on.
Let's not forget .... This is how it was originally. No cheesy explosions and flying bats etc... But Hyde pre recorded in the mirror. The tour with Bob Cuccioli did that before Broadway. 1997 Broadway invented the cheesy flipping back and forth... And now we feel cheated that this went back.
Yeah but it’s more meaningful on the other version because it’s showing the internal
@@tannerlevasseur2640 not necessarily. With the “flipping back and forth” we’re seeing the effects of the internal, not the internal itself. This version shows us that in a more grandiose albeit chaotic method.
Everything about this version is awful. Why have they turned the cool songs into lame metal
This guy rocks.Hate on the direction all you want, but respect the man, Homie busts a high C right before dying. You try that 8 shows a week.
finally a lover like me! lol most of the hate comments prob come from older people. lol
Watching this is like doing a line of ecstasy laced cocaine on a dirty bathroom counter at a Nightwish concert.
Sounds like fun
That's oddly specific
@@gizemgonenc5342 And very true 😅
And you know this from personal experience.
@@spaceinvader9815 ;)
I absolutely love this version and here's why; in the original version the actor switches back and forth between the two characters, illustrating their split personalities and showing off the actor's ability to transition between the two seamlessly. However, that's only if it is done right. With the traditional method, actors run the risk of playing it disingenuously and what should have been a suspenseful and heart-wrenching moment for the audience, turns into a dull cliche, or worse, comedic. This version however, shows the internal struggle Jekyll faces by shifting the perspective from outside to inside his mind. Look at the digital effects. The images of shattered glass, fire, eyes fixed on Jekyll while a demonic Hyde menacingly looms over him are symbolic. What better way to illustrate the chaotic state of Jekyll's tortured mind?
I couldn't agree more! If you search an animatic of this song, they show Jekyll's internal struggle to free himself from Hyde. This version gives of those vibes that does the some justice!
yeah this version is infinitely better than hasselhof. still cant believe hes a broadway actor, miscast of the century
I like the effects, but I prefer watching the actor alter between two characters and witness the battle be more internal.
Yeah I....hated this lol
Same this made me disappointed haha
@@thejoshuascales STFU!! Constantine's portrayal is the best one
@@tannerlevasseur2640 your face makes me disappointed
@@mrseddiediaz I see you’re obviously a big fan of Constantine, and that’s great :) Nothing wrong with him as a singer/performer himself, it’s just I’m more married to the original vision and take on this musical and number. To each his own!
Music is pretty good, but this scene was hilariously blocked/executed. This looks silly. It's too much. The original one man duet was much more powerful.
No
I actually liked this style. You cannot compare it to the original, for it is completely restyled. For the metalized version it intended to be, i think it was pretty successful and haunting.
Yeah, and I like how they distorted Hyde's voice in certain areas to make it sound demonic. They even made it look demonic with some awesome special effects. Which I think is super cool.
how did they do the hyde effect with him in the mirror when Jekyll is standing on the stage dressed completely different? pre recorded video? its sooo cool!
Whilst I really like the one man duet version, this is a really interesting take on it. I really do like this, even if I prefer Cuccioli and Warlow
Visually I love it, though I also preffer the one-man duet as well.
However, I don't like the jazz-metal musical score. I would like to see this staging with the original score.
there is one where they use two actors as a one man debut can be very difficult
duet not debut
Something that I would like to see, because I would love to be a Broadway director/scriptwriter when I graduate college, is if they had the mirror like this version but Hyde would only show up when Jekyll was looking directly into it. And they sort of did the same thing with the one-man-fight in the original broadway run. They would have to position the mirror at a certain angle and make it pretty big but I think it would be fascinating to see a Jekyll and Hyde fight in one man's body like how they initially were, but make it look like two different people from the audience's perspective. Almost like they're directly looking at each other, which is the mirror, but really Jekyll is just looking back at himself and he sees Hyde.
That sounds absolutely awesome and I'd so love to see it! I can imagine Jekyll walking back and forth past it in the first bit of the song not noticing it until Hyde starts singing-
the one thing I like most about this version is the general idea behind it... Instead of having it be a physical back and forth like how it is more traditionally done, this really makes it more of a mental battle... We're seeing what is going on inside of his head as he's fighting with Hyde. Hyde is trying to claw his way out, and Henry is pushing back, and we're seeing that mental struggle Henry is having (live on the stage) with Hyde in his mind, trying to keep his hold over Henry.
The discordant vocals are 2:45 are quite creepy
About everybody talking about the one or two actor version of the song, i want to give my vision about it.
One actor - I thing it's powerful, and you can see how the pain and agony jekyll show during the transformation, as he's quickly becomes hyde, it's good, and its very important to the show.
Two actors/pre recorded - I thing this role thing have such more power, like you are now deep into the jekyll and hyde universe, and you know see the show like the two characters see as well, you watch jekyll looking at hyde its a powerful and very significant thing, you are seeing just like the characters is seeing, and this can be such a powerful meaning in this show.
Well, that's my opinion, i love the both
I was definitely blown away by the visuals, but it still doesn't make up for the magic that was seeing an actor portray two roles as once in the same song. There's just something about that that no special effects would be able to top. And let's be honest, I think we can all agree that the reverb effect at the end was a little much.
Constantine has the most amazing vocals I have ever heard.
Yes love him ❤️❤️❤️❤️
There's too much going on. The concept is nice but with so much sound going on my head was spinning just listening to it :/
I know this production is controversial but I like it- I'd also like to point out that though it appears to be a mirror, before Hyde shows up it's a portrait, very Dorian grey-
I must say the screen effects are awesome. it perfectly portrays the struggle. However I think Constantine is a great singer and rocker but the role of Dr. Jeckell and Hyde is completely misinterpreted and should in my opinion not be that rocky but more classical Rob evan's voice is better suited
The album with Rob Evans has a rocky tone to it.
that is one sexy sexy jekyll and the way he played the role, so broken down, so unhinged.... that... that was just perfect.
Absolutely ridiculous. I think most of us who love Jekyll & Hyde can agree that it is a pretty silly show, but playing "Confrontation" in this style completely robs the show of one of it's highlights - seeing an actor believably switch between both personalities. The special effects lighting that served the show so well during "Transformation" is so over-the-top it drains away any power the song is supposed to have. Constantine has a fine voice, and can belt if you allow him to (and even if he couldn't do that, he's still better than Hasselhoff), so why cut the legs out from under a good performer? I don't get it.
Still, this show tends to get rebooted every ten years or so... thus I look forward to the 2025 production of Jekyll & Hyde starring Jaden Smith.
Hannah Meltzer what do you mean
Matthew Rios i like jekyll and hyde but you have no grounds to say this is bad i,m sick and tired of people saying these singers are bad when they have no proof to back up they,er claims
+shadow strike You have no proof to say anthony warlow is bad
@@lowtiershadowyt9008 what I believe they're saying is that this version of the song is absolutely ridiculous and silly
And also, it just isn't as good compared to my man Cuccioli, because it doesn't show the internal battle within Jekyll with Hyde
Honestly? When I listen to the songn this is exactly how I envisioned it.
The same with me. This is how I envisioned it the first time I heard it on the Anthony Warlow recording.
I don’t like this very much, but I will say one thing I appreciate: it gives a reason for the song to end: he takes the “antidote”. Most other versions have Jekyll winning just, because. Still a bad production overall, but I love the little details peppered in
At first I was disappointed that he wasn't switching back and forth, but I get why they did it this way - to make it look like this is all in his mind - Hyde is taking over Jekyll who is trying to keep it together...
2:45 I got chills the first time I heard that! geez!
This is just...... Chaotic
I need to know how people do not see this as an internal battle? A mirror is a symbol for the reflection of who somebody is. This is a perfect way to represent a 'confrontation' between his outer more "normal" self and his inner dark personality. It is still internalized because he is speaking to his own reflection. He isn't fighting with another 3 dimensional being 🤷♂️ it also gives the actor a chance to actually breathe on stage... we can't have them run out of breath during a performance now can we? 😅 however, it is not negating or going against the other way of performing this song, which can be just as effective if done right with a lot of talent... I think that both ways are both incredible and no one should dislike the one way just because the other way is the version you're used to 🤷♂️ also it's nice to see a change and someone trying something different for once because a copy of something else can get quite boring 🙈
Oh wow. This was absolutely NOT my style.
It's interesting how they switched from the one person switching between Hyde and Jekyll to background motion and Jekyll.
The background thing is not really bad. And it makes it a lot easier for the performer!
Buuut. Of course it's hard to portray Jekyll's struggle this way.
Well. After I heared Anthony Warlow's version it's really hard to compete with the master. But we have to add, that Anthony did only the concept recording( as far as I know) and they were able to cut. Which is not possible live.
Still we have to give Constantine credit!
Jekyll/Hyde is a really hard character to play and I think he did well. BUT still I don't like it.
Yeah...the original way it was done may have involved a video/mirror like this, but the song is really much more effective by doing it simply with one actor live onstage. As Cuccioli proved, great acting is more exciting than any (cheesy-looking) technology.
This is a really cool twist on the standard.
I hate how you guys are bashing on him for all this stuff he's not perfect guys.. yes I mean there may be stuff he could have improved on but that doesn't give you a right to say straight up he did bad.. I just saw the full musical On here and I actually thought he did fine.. if your gonna bash me now for saying this don't bother saying anything at all...
Wow have never seen this interpretation. Always nice to see new performances
ikr!!!???
Love the awesome background works!
Is there a place to watch the entire production? This was freaking BRILLIANT!
If someone misses the classic sound i would recommend Russian version! Still going in theatre. There are a lot of videos on youtube
This feels incredibly cinematic. Different, but definitely worth a watch.
It's just lazy and not doing justice to the characters without singing both parts, Constantine is a good singer but it was a terrible choice to make it separate
3:00 gives me the chills!
Why the hell is he smiling? That's supposed to be devastating in the beginning
that's a nervous grin
Screw you man! Constantine is amazing!
Amy La Rue Maybe he is, but that doesn't make it a good show.
He was freaking out, not purposely smiling. Imagine if you killed all those people and you're losing it...
like uh dare I say...norman bates? hint hint
It's way too much, the phrase "quality over quantity" doesn't exist for no reason. I like the screen idea and the demonic tone Hyde gets, but the explosions were too much
So is he singing both parts live with Hyde being a video or was the entirety of Hyde's audio recorded beforehand
Dan McCloskey Is that a serious question? You really think he could sing with his mouth closed?
Really cool. I think some parts could use some work but some of his interpretations are really good. Is this the one that was directed by Robert Cuccioli, the original broadway actor?
Not this version.
Constantine played Jekyll and Hyde again twice in 2018, and Cuccioli directed the one in Autumn 2018
This was really creepy and good I have legit chills from hearing Hyde's Voice it felt like he was all over the room and you couldn't escape him!👏🏾🔥
Seeing this I sigh and wonder what has gone on with people's minds. While I am glad this amazing play has been revised, I don't like this. I understand the modern effect but personally I prefer the switching back and forth. It really shows Henry's struggle to with hyde. I love the set and how they put it up but it may have been a little too much. This is just strictly my personal opinion. Too much rock. While I understand the voices it was a little distracting from the duet. I don't really like the actor. Brent Ramirez did a lot better. If he, or any other actor, did it, it might be better. I think they just need to go back to the drawing board and rethink a few things first.
do you have the full show? please..
I’m watching this while having a mental breakdown and I’m honestly scared
I’ll say this now, I do not like this version, I feel like I’ve lost all the creepiness I felt with the original, but does not mean this guy is any less talented, like, dang!
and i thought david hasselhoff was bad! dam i take Hoff over this guy
the way they did "I'll live inside you forever'' was even better than the Cuccioli, Hasselhoff, Bach, or Evan version!
when I first watched it I got some chills XD
3:51
This would be okay if it was a CD only thing like "Nightmare Revisited" , but not a thing that would be in Broadway. So, I will remember this version as like a remix from a band or something.
He smiled too much as Dr. Jekyll....isn't he supposed to be torn?
Its a nervous thing
I like this. The effects and visuals are cool. However, there was something special about seeing one guy duet with himself; it took a really good performer to pull that off. This actually makes the song rather unimpressive
That said, the distorted voice was really creepy and this was definitely a mindfuck, which I presume was what they were going for.
What version is this? It's different from all the others I've seen on RUclips.
STUNNING!!!! always hated that up down version of the one actor this is brilliant. Xx
good song!
It’s still not as powerful when the person playing Jekyll and Hyde doesn’t sing both parts live, but still an amazing technical masterpiece the way that they did it.
they could have make all the projections but keeping the one man's duet, that was the trad mark of the show.
Neat. Not as dynamic as the one man duet, but cool.
near the end was one lyric changed
shadow strike speaking of lyric changes, did you see the video of Michael Crawford's last Phantom performance with Dale Kristien? he changes one lyric of one of the songs as well
Krystal Harwood no but i plan to
So awesome!
Think you can put in "Murder, Murder" next?
don't bother! THAT version sucks!
Yeah this version of the play is one of my favourites but they ironically killed that song
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😇 Maroulis
This is a copout. What is even happening
this is what happen when a rock band merges with a play
I like it!!
:/ this confuses me, warhol was the best (sorry if I spelt his name wrong)
A pesar de que el protagonista actuando es muy malo y es una versión rara... La puesta en escena se ve brillante!
It’s kinda sad a little bit
love it
Does anyone have any idea where I can watch this? I would love to see the whole thing!
Go to the channel of the bigot shadow strike, and it is in his about. You can find him in the comments of any Jekyll/Hyde video. North Bridge posted links to his unlisted version. Hope this helps!
once again "Jesus'' defeats "Satan''. lol
Towards the end it got better.....but the beginning was a bit.....well, weak....but the singing is still PRETTY good.....
Fight it
WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!
Umm... ok
I have the DVD of this show i know where you can find it
TELL ME!!!!!!
+MR.Tollo I bought it from a site called broadway escapes
+Brooke Bosse I hope that helps
+Brooke Bosse thanks bro!
+MR.Tollo your welcome
This is the worst, most busy, rendition I have ever seen. That being said, the lighting team needs a raise. Like, a really big one
I liked that.
Saw the original on Broadway in the 90's and this horror show of a remake. This was possibly the "wurst" performance of what WAS a spectacular Broadway show. Two thumbs down and a clothespin for your nose for this stinker of a remake.
I don't the recording of Hyde was a very good idea it just makes it less horrifying. And this coming from someone who say the show!
Can you please transform into s self where you can speak English?
I'll be honest, this isn't my favorite. I don't particularly like the rock aspects of it, and I think an important part of Jekyll and Hyde is being able to portray the two characters without prior recording, but that's all personal opinon (of course).
This Is Actually Better Then Warlows Version
NO! THOUGHTCRIMINAL!
Bill Angell Can Someone Give His Opinions
Aliisan Tetik I just did, so did you
I disagree but you can have your opinion
cool
king diamond anyone?
He is a good singer and I liked some aspects of his performance but this is not the way it must be done, I love it with one man duet.
Actually the live original version was done like this one, with a pre-recorded Hyde
It's very sloppy. The singing that is. Each verse is very fragmented. Nice voice but....
You're sloppy
That s terryfing
This might be the worst performance of this role I’ve ever seen...I fucking hate it with the rock voice...it’s supposed to be broadway, not an AC/DC concert
This Confrontation is pretty much Eminem's My Darling in a nutshell. The song as it was is already pretty similar, now the scenery is matching up with the lyrics. It's pretty cool.
I love this song, and it's a great scene. But this version, I really don't appreciate.
Nice visual effects but the song is weaker
Your face is weaker
Never before have I regretted watching a video as much as this. What do I even say. I want to die.
Ridiculous. Looks like a cheap theme park show. And what a stupid final spin.
Amy La Rue Good rebuttal. My favorite part was how you said the things that were good about this clip.
Listen, that's cool that you're a Constantine fan. And by all means, cheer him on. Objectively, this is bad theatre.
Jonathan McCormick Your mom is bad theater and so is your face.
I think ur eyes are just for decoration
Amy La Rue Nah, he's right, it's lame.
I kindda dug that! Jekyll's all like...hah! take THAT, sucka!
Sure, the visuals are neat, but how does anyone like him? The singing was absolutely terrible and hard to understand.
he sings rock
for those of you who are small minded and have no sense of vision with this version of the musical let me explain
constantine brought a new energy to the play and it works the metal parts of the play are here for a reason as jekyll he is more close to the original but as hyde he embraces the metal aspect of his role . i believe Constantine has outplayed everyone , now that can be to much but lets be honest here who has the right to say whats good and whats bad just accept what we are given and move on . i can see people hate this cause its something new
+shadow strike This is a musical, not an AC/DC concert, besides this guy is a ripoff of AC/DC, hell they could probably pull this song off better than he did.
"Who has the right to say what's good and what's bad"
Sure, does that mean you'll stop shitting all over Warlow's performance? Or does it only apply to the things YOU like?
Can you of find a recording of the full thing?
Ok, watched the whole thing, the mirror thing was cool, I liked Murder, Murder, but it didn't feel right. The mix up of when some of the songs were did that.
+Bill Angell Where did you find a recording? I have always wanted to watch this version since I heard of it but they stopped the shows before I could see it in person.
I hate this version...
I hate you
*when your child sticks their boogers up your nose..*
Wow! That was just awful. It's right up there with Sebastian Baach's performance.
Yes it is that awful. Deal with it. For Pete sake this scene was ridiculous I can't even take it seriously.
Well jokes on you since Anthony Warlow will be reprising the role for the 25th anniversary. And other actors managed to do Jekyll's burden of Mr Hyde in a way that the audience could possibly take it seriously unlike this joke of a performance.
+shadow strike I understand you two I think I like thise version better I agree with you :)
+North Bridge and you too :D
+KingNazaru I'd go far enough to say that Bach's was better
Nope. David Hasselhoff and all before him did this number so much better. Hyde is the evil of a man. I want to see the struggle not a screen. My comment has nothing to do with this actor but the design is very disappointing.
Bitch don't EVEN compare Constantine to the Horrendous Hasselhoff! He was the worst
@@mrseddiediaz I have seen worse than Hasselhoff but I wouldn’t call this performance art either
wtf is this