The Voice of Reason, made me become Byzantine Catholic. I was Eastern Orthodox for most of my Christian life after I left the Jehovah's Witness organization. When I first saw his video on the Rosary in like early 2023, I was hooked. And during the middle of the summer, I decided to convert, and now I'm a Melkite Byzantine Catholic as of late September. Thank you Alex.
I'm currently talking with a girl who is JW. What specifically encouraged you to leave the church despite being excommunicated and shunned by everyone in the church? What specifically motivated you to come to Catholicism? Thanks!
@@SuperJosh-rs6kp What lead me away from JW's is really just the fact that I got less serious about it over time. My grandmother tried to hook me on to it again but I was more into this non-denominational form of Christianity. But that phase didn't last long until I looked into Church History and invested most of my time in getting books (which thankfully I've gotten into classic literature due to this). And what kept my away from going back into the kingdom's hall is the denial of the Trinity, the denial of Hell, and the majority of weird doctrines such as a literal reading of Revelation 7&14 concerning the 144k. Not to mention the belief that Michael is Jesus, denial of blood transfusions, and many of the failed prophesies. Our Lady is the most amazing thing God has given us, I'm fully convinced it was apart of his mission, as John 19:26-28 shows that our Lady was given to St. John, and Jesus said all was finished. Our Lady's last words in Scripture is found in John 2:5 saying "do whatever he tells you" in context of Jesus, and the last words of Jesus concerning Mary is John 19:27, being "behold your Mother!" Mostly I have faith that the Miraculous Medal and the Rosary is what was used by God to convert me back to the Church. I visited this one church that was very famous in my culture (Cuban), based on the apparition the "Caridad del Cobre" with my Catholic side of the family, which is the side I was mostly raised by, I bought some sacramentals there, including a chaplet with the miraculous medal. I have 100% conviction that the little piece of metal, the Miraculous Medal, was a piece of matter that God used as a communication of grace to me.
@@certaincyril Thank you so much for the reply! Is there any topic that you would recommend I focus on in trying to convert her? It's really difficult in trying to understand what is *really* going on in the organization so thats why I love coming to people who have experienced it first hand.
Alex was a Huge part of my journey into the faith. I'm now a devout catholic who attends traditional mass & prays the rosery ! I remember seeking for more knowledge & wisdom , I believe God is using you ! ♡
This is one of the best teachings I’ve watched defending the Marian Dogmas. It all started for me on this Catholic journey when my eyes were opened to “behold your mother, Woman behold your Son”That verse was never in my Bible until one day it sneaked in and caught my attention. Since then it’s been an amazing journey and growing deeper in my love for Jesus by falling deeper in love with his Mother. “Rather blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it” Mary helps us hear the word of God and keep it! God bless your ministry bro!
So true, it was these dogmas that brought me to my first Mass, when I was walking up to the Church I saw a statue of our Blessed Mother and I just knew I was home in that moment.
These videos are SOOOO helpful. Please continue making educational videos so we can all learn more. Ever since your videos came across my TikTok I have been wanting to get closer to my faith. Thanks Alex!! 🙏🏽
Thank you for the great video on our Blessed Mother! It was her intercession in my life that brought me to know our Lord last year. Praise be to God, and thanks for the constant great videos! God bless brother!
Appreciate your teaching in this format with the youth. Poor Catechesis has been the plague in the Catholic church for decades now. These young minds are blessed. Thank you and keep it up. Humbly and diligently. God bless.
Currently in mystagogia and this is by far the best and most thorough video I have seen on the Marian Dogmas. This has made it very clear to me. Thank you!
Hi @Whispn, I'm sorry to say that Voice of Reason is blind, and carrying people that is also blind. 2 Timothy 4:3-4 ~ 3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound[a] teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. Let me help you. I really care, I hope everyone can read this, but I'll comment only on few people so I will not be reported. Never did Jesus called Mary "MOTHER" but "WOMAN". Where in the bible did Jesus called Mary "Mother"? LUKE 8:19-21 ~ Now Jesus’ mother and brothers came to see him, but they were not able to get near him because of the crowd. 20 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to see you.” 21 He replied, “MY MOTHER AND BROTHERS ARE THOSE WHO HEAR GOD’S WORD AND PUT IT INTO PRACTICE.” Before Jesus turned the Jar into wine because Mary is leading Him to do miracle, Jesus said John 2:4 ~And Jesus said to her, "Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come." But remember, Jesus didn't disrespected Mary here, but Jesus followed, showing that even the time is not right, He can do miracles, for He is God and Human at the same time. Can God call His Creation "MOTHER"? John 19:26 ~When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son!" Now, how come MARY is the COREDEEMER of Christ? Did Mary got CRICIFIED? Did SHE DIED FOR OUR SINS? JOHN 14:6 ~ 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. In other word, GOD IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD.
Hey Brother! Catholic here, was scrolling to comments and seeing yours, you seem really caring for the truth and not spreading hate, so let me reply to your points, just have a discussion between brothers in Christ. First off no Catholic believe that Mary is Our Saviour, what we say is that Mary has a great role in our redemption thanks to her "yes" to the angel Gabriel, and that is just fact, may I ask you what you believe would have happen if Mary says "no" to the angel in that occasion? Just curious, but beeing said that nobody remove nothing to the glory of Our Saviour. Now you actually made a great point when pointing out the Jesus call Mary "Woman", have you ever ask yourself why? Was Jesus disrespecting her in the wedding on Cana and on the cross? Nope! What you see actually is part of a beautiful redemption plan created by God! In fact the very 2 chapters of the Gospel of John are echoing the 7 days creation described in Genesis! Take a look at it please, you see in the Gospel of John on very first chapter "In the beginning" exactly like in Genesis, then following by "on the next day" and again "on the next day", and again, dipinting the 4 days of creation. Then you got to Chapter 2 and what you see? "On the third day that was a wedding" there we go, 4 days described in the first chapter and now on the 3 day a wedding, 4 + 3 seven days of creation! And like you have said Jesus (the new Adam as we know) call Mary "Woman", John is actually describing Mary as the new and greater Eve and just like the original one Mary was conceived sinless, and Our Blessed Mother never fall! This wasn't really debated for the early christians, please have a read on this: answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2022/09/19/early-church-on-mary-as-the-new-and-greater-eve/ Then we believe that Mary is the new Ark, have you ever hear a Catholic says that? Strange to hear it for a lot of our protestant brother but we do have the bible and read it too! 😁 Here is why, full of bible verses that you can check: www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/mary-the-ark-of-the-new-covenant We also believe that Mary is the queen of Heaven, and not the egyptian pagan "god" described in the OT full of sin, but the queen mother of the Davidic Kingdom! Jesus is king and He is in David genealogy like we know on Mattew 1, so therefore Mary is the queen mother! Please have a look here: www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-marys-queenship-biblical It is important and I really care to tell to all of my brothers in Christ that everything that the Catholic Churvh believe as far as Mary is following up by everything all Christian believe as far as Jesus. I'm not here to debate brother, you seem to care about truth so I take my time to try to make this case clear, please let me know what you think about this and God bless you
@Axlandros thanks for the comment. As of now, I have other things and plan to do, but I'll get back at checking those links and then comment back to you. I'll screenshot this, so in case I forget, I can remember ♥️.
"For he took notice of his lowly servant girl, and from now on all generations will call me blessed." Luke 1:48 "And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" Luke 1:43
So many questions. I feel like the more I try to find answers, the more questions I have. With all of the noise and interpretations, how can we find truth?
Apostolic succession brother, please look for the early church fathers, there is a great book named "the fathers know best" by Jimmi Akin, totally recommend it. And if you're looking for catholicism please read the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the official teachings of the church, full of bible references and everything for support. Let me know if I can help you with something specific, and God bless you.
Always offer you struggles to God at the foot of the cross, trusting that He will guide you where you need when your soul (not your emotions) need to be guided. Prayerfully trust Him.
Thanks Alex for your awesome hospitality you are bringing lots of lost souls back to the one true church founded by God himself through his apostle’s Peter right all the way through to Pope Francis love you bro 🇼🇸☦️🫂
Thank You Bro Alex for the work you are doing. I greatly appreciate your teachings especially regarding these 4 Marian Dogmas. This session make me know much deeper into these Marian dogmas , and love our Catholic Church more n more. May Our Lord And His/ Our Blessed Mother Bless and Protect You Always 🙏🏻
Thank you Alex for all your amazing videos. I pray I become as knowledgeable as you to help others come into the faith ❤ I’d like to become a Catechist and teach Children one day 🙏🏼
Hey Voice of Reason, could you make a video talking about Ethiopian Orthodoxy and the Orientals? They have many claims to supposedly having relics (the true Cross, the holy prepuce, and the Ark of the Covenant) and would like to hear your thoughts, along with their miaphysitism.
I’m only 6 minutes in and I can already see the spiritual chains. So heavy they make me tired! Lol In all seriousness, please Catholics. Find your freedom in His grace. He died for it, honor it. ❤
@@VoiceOfReason_ I feel compelled to respond to your points. I’ll do them in individual posts to keep it organized. I want to let you know that my intention is nothing but respect and love for Catholics and all men, but I do like to get a little spicy and blunt sometimes, and I do like to joke, but never disrespect or mockery from me. My goal is to learn and be learned from, and to lead all men to truth in Christ. ❤
@@chris20874 Hello! Can I ask you why do you think Jesus didn't think that and didn't act like it? Matthew 1:22-23: All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: "The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel" (which means "God with us"). Therefore I would say that if you deny the title "Mother of God" to Mary you're denying the name Immanuel, you can't separate Jesus divinity and His human nature, He is one person, and He is God, so we got the virgin (Mary) give birth to the Immanuel through the Holy Spirit. Mary call Jesus her Saviour because He still is the Saviour of the world and because through Him and for her role she has been preserved from the original sin by God, this is demonstrable by the very title in which the angel address her as "full of grace", that verb speak volumes in his greek form "Kecharitomene" literally means "completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace", I can give you some resources to check if you want to to verify that, Mary is also seeing as the "new Eve" who like the original one was preserved by sin until the fall, yet Mary never sin because of her fullness of grace. There are also early christian writings who confirmed that Mary was seeing as being perfectly grace from the beginning.
@@Emet315 I've seen a lot of you also, specially here. People who don't know the word of God. People who've never cared about the Bible. If teachings and doctrine are not aligned with the bible, then that's the true heretic. Early christians diverted biblical teachings, and Catholicism is the result. Read Corinthians and Timothy, then you will know that.
@@Emet315 I'm not sure, can you see my first comment? It seems to have been deleted. I'll say it again for @SyafiqHadzir, Catholicism is not Christianity. There are 40,000+ denominations claiming to be christians, how can we identify true Christianity? There's no right denomination, but only the right relationship with God. 2 Timothy 3:16 ~ all Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness
@@jonathanjundarino7784 Hi, I know you mean well when you say all this and you believe you are spreading the truth. I appreciate that but this is the wrong comment section to be talking about this. There are other videos where you can post your comments. Please don’t try to disrespect other people here.
Mary hadn't known Joseph yet that's why Mary said that. The Bible said that Joseph didn't "know" her until after Jesus was born. Also this happened after Mary spoke to the angel so Joseph hadn't taken her to be his wife yet. "And Joseph awoke from his sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took Mary as his wife, but kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a Son; and he called His name Jesus." ~Matthew 1:24-25 (NASB)
I went to a Baptist Church once and they had a sermon mentioning the "brothers" of Jesus. I've heard the Adelphos argument but I don't think they agree with what it means
Ok, so, I totally agree that Mary is the mother of God. And that being said, I can agree that she is the mother of hus divinity too, because he us divine and he was in her womb. Now, that is not to say that his divinity originates from Mary, correct?
Not all Bibles are the same, some added some took away from the scripture, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, holy man, chosen by God to write his story, to give us love, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost, salvation
The Roman Empire became a religion, never went away... Revelation 17:5 Authorized Version And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth. Revelation 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
As a Catholic, I do not question the dogma or doctrine, including the perpetual virginity of Mary, the Mother of God. However, my question is: Why would a girl, devout to a life of virginity get married? Does it not make more sense, that she would remain a virgin because of her discovered holiness?
2 Timothy 3:16-17 ~ 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. If you have doubts, seek God through the "Word of God", scripture. If something is not written or cannot be backed up with the bible, and it's talking about God, then it is not worth learning, because any conclusion outside or cannot be supported by the scriptures will fall to wrong. But one this is sure, anything that opposes the Scriptures is sure wrong, because it's not vice versa.
Marriages were arranged back then and were a social contract. They were not done out of romantic love as we think of a marriage today. So, there could be many reasons why a girl would be betrothed to someone that had taken a vow. The other important aspect is that St. Joseph agreed with her vow of celibacy.
46:14 You said by mistake Jude 1:28, is Jude 1:24, there are only 25 verses in Jude. “Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, And to present you faultless Before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy, To God our Savior, Who alone is wise, Be glory and majesty, Dominion and power, Both now and forever. Amen.” Jude 1:24-25 NKJV
Ok so on the cross Jesus gives Mary to John because he wanted John to take care of her since there was no one else. Not because Jesus wanted Mary to be the mother of all of us, right?
Hello brother or sister in christ ! That's because the marian dogma is unfortunately unbiblical. I'm watching the video, but I'm pretty positive I heard it all already. Guy makes a lot of baseless claims about dogmas. If the Marian dogma was biblical, I would have absolutely no problem with it. If transsubstantiation was biblical (real presence) I would have no problem with it. If Faith + works was biblical, I would have zero problem with it. I follow the Bible. Because the Roman Catholic church has been far, very far, from being infallible. The Assumption wasn't even a dogma before the XX° century, if I remember correctly. We cannot hold on to 2 millenias of tradition without having actual evidence that it really comes from Jesus.
@shadowdepths2486 Hello my fellow brethren in Christ. Thanks for replying. Its my understanding that the early church held transubstantiation as true and I think it is biblical "this IS my body and my blood". Now do I believe it is the physical body or the spiritual body? I don't know and it doesn't necessarily matter to me, all I know is I should treat it with extreme reverence. All the Marian dogmas are not biblical I agree. Some of them have a basis in Scripture but not explicitly stated. But I'm in the process of learning the Early Church's opinions on them and it seems perpetual virginity is correct at the least. The other Dogmas, I don't know yet. I instinctively have an aversion to the immaculate conception but I'm in the process of following the evidence then coming to a conclusion. All of this comes down to whatever the Early Church held as true to me as they learnt directly from Jesus and the disciples. Also I believe that the issue Protestants have with Catholics about faith plus works comes down to intentional obstinance or a misunderstanding of what Catholics understand of Grace. If you asked them they will say they believe in salvation through Grace. They don't believe that you having to cooperate with grace makes it works based. Unless I'm wrong and a Catholic corrects me. I'm learning more about the Catholic and Orthodox faith at the moment with a particular interest in the early Church as I reckon learning what the disciples of the Disciples did after Jesus's death in terms of how they worshipped is going to be as close to the fullness of the truth as I can get. Thats my honest thoughts. ❤️✝️
The angel of God came to Mary and when she was told what was going to happen she said let it be as you've said. So she chose to do it. Having said that she was just a devout woman who followed and obeyed God.
Alex, if you Google catholic dogmas, you get a list of 255 dogmas. I read them and the list seems ok to me. But, the church has no official list of dogmas. Obviously, it knows its own dogmas. Why doesnt it publish an official list? I wish it would. I want to know them.
early! guys i was born CATHOLIC but always been lukewarm or I DIDN'T believe in Jesus, but recently comes home to Jesus CHRIST. I want to get baptised, my question is should I get baptised because I was baptised when i was baby. and the Catholic believes that 1 baptism only. Edit: I think I got the answer that I needed, in Catholic only one time baptism is needed, as long as the formula is "in the name of the FATHER, SON, and HOLY spirit. 1 God, 1 baptism.
if you had a Catholic baptism, you shouldn't be re-baptized. Talk with a priest to discuss your formal return to the faith. Look up "MassTimes", very helpful for finding a church in your area. God bless you in your journey, friend.
You're correct that many believe in one baptism. If you were baptized as an infant in the Catholic Church, that baptism is considered valid because your parents and godparents made that commitment on your behalf. However, if you haven't received your confirmation yet, you'll need to complete that sacrament. It's always best to talk to a priest for guidance, as they have the authority to provide the right advice. Please, I'm not a priest, so it's important to seek their counsel for what steps you should take next.
In the Bible you would get baptized after you've repented and have chosen to follow Christ. If you've done that then yes you should get baptized especially if God is putting it your heart.
"took flesh from her"? A Baby doesn't take flesh from the mother the baby is a separate human from the start and grows it's own flesh. Baby it's just worded wrong.
@@jakezuloaga3871 I think he is referencing Jude 1:24 "Now to him who is able to preserve you without sin, and to present you spotless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, in the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, "
It is actually Judges 11 34-40 that speaks of “ Not Know a man”. This is actually fascinating as several other passages in these verses can correlate to the New Testament in particular to the Father making the Vow for her daughter.
@@dherpin4874hi, I'm not sure why I can't see my comments or can't send there anymore. I'll get back to your comment tomorrow, maybe around or earlier than 24 hours.
@@dherpin4874 These are what you've said: "Why would you presume saint here on earth that can pray for us would once they enter into “greater” glory no longer be able to pray for us?..........." First, who are the saints? Acts 9:32, and many other bible verses, there are many alive saints, they are the people who've consecrated their life to Christ. Unlike Catholic Church, they only select very few saints, and one of the conditions is to be physically dead. You believe that God already written the names of the saved in the book of life, correct? In case not, Revelation 13:8. The moment those people written in the book of life accepted Christ; they are already saints, not because they are sinless, but because Jesus already cleaned them for once. Jesus isn't cleaning us every time we sin, He did it once, Hebrews 7, this is another mistake of the Catholic, since they don't know this. In case Catholic know this, please don't be angry with me, I'm just ignorant about what Catholic beliefs are. Now, regarding the question, I'll ask back. Where did the idea come from that they can hear our prayers? Did they become omnipresent like God? Matthew 6:20 tells us that there will be no rust, no theft, etc. meaning, people will no longer need to worry. Although there are no sins in heaven, are they going to see murder, theft, rape, carnal prayers, deceptive prayers and so much more? Did God give them powers to do that? First of all, we do not truly know, but if you are going to ask me, I believe that God will not give us that power, for He alone is enough. About 1 Corinthians 12, let's not talk about this, because it will be very big, but this I can assure you, Protestants believe in these, but only for the time of the Apostles, while there are some Protestants who believe that God is using people to do those miracles until now. But all protestant believes that God is still doing miracles, again, the context of the 1 Corinthians 12 are the spiritual "gifts". About my stand, I will not say it, because whether I believe or not, truth remains truth. let's skip other things about Lazarus, Greater, lesser, etc., because I believe that they are already answered. If not, you can ask me again, but please make it small, because it may really require a lot of time, and I'm answering this on my free time (you are welcome to ask, of course!!!). About Luke 2:35 ~ First, we need to know the context, Luke 2:33-35 33 And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him. 34 And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, “Behold, this child is appointed for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is opposed 35 (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also), so that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.” This verses talks about Jesus suffering, About Luke 2:35, who are those "many"? also, why "may" and not "will"? Because it is talking to the inner thoughts of the people who have hidden motives, those people who would like to kill Jesus, another one that has been revealed is Peter really didn't believe Christ about the Resurrection, remember the 3x sound of the chicken representing Peter 3x denial? Also this John 16:19-22 ~ 19 Jesus saw that they wanted to ask him about this, so he said to them, “Are you asking one another what I meant when I said, ‘In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me’? 20 Very truly I tell you, you will weep and mourn while the world rejoices. You will grieve, but your grief will turn to joy. 21 A woman giving birth to a child has pain because her time has come; but when her baby is born she forgets the anguish because of her joy that a child is born into the world. 22 So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy. hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/34697/in-luke-235-what-is-meant-by-so-that-thoughts-from-many-hearts-may-be-revealed This link might be helpful. Sorry, but I will never believe anything that is not in the bible. 2 Timothy 3:16-17~ "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." The bible is complete. Who received the old testament? It was the Jews right? It is holy to them, and not just tradition, because that's their reference of what is correct, not sure about now, since people in Israel departed from God and they also don't believe Jesus. Now New Testament is the revelation of God (Not just the book or Revelation, but the whole New Testament.) The bible is complete, it is sufficient. Ephesians 2:20 tells that Christianity is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. If we still have Apostles and Prophets, does it mean that the foundation of Christianity is in the process of building? No, because there's no prophets and apostles now, anyone who claim to be prophet and apostles are not coming from God, but of the enemy.
@@dherpin4874 can you see my long comment? I'm really gonna be sad if you can't see it. Cause I can't see it, But there's a sign that it was sent, this really makes me sick. I spent time...
@presleymathurin5836 because all he could do is add words on the bible and twist it, no offense I realy like Alex but this is getting more confusing. And ir feels like I have to accept it in oder to understand when the word of God says otherwise
54:44. I’m sorry this right here is a bit of a lame argument. What do you mean, what do you do with Jesus ?😂 Like hello, the whole point of Romans 3 was to tell people they needed a saviour and that everyone has fallen short, hence it’s understood that the passage doesn’t include Jesus. Plus He’s sinless since He is God ! That passage is obviously referring to the whole of humanity which includes Mary! P.S: Have a look at Luke 11:27-28 while you’re at it. Take care and God bless friend ✝️
Hail, to greet. Grace, undeserved gift. “Greetings Mary, who has been given the fullness of God’s undeserved gift” She rejoiced in God HER Savior. Why did she need a savior if she was sinless from the start? You mentioned she was royalty. Mary had faith, she was a child of God just like us in Christ. We are also called royalty.
@@artax7664 Hail is a greeting given only to royalty. Can you give any example from scripture of any other Christian being greeted with ‘Hail’? No, you can’t, because it doesn’t exist. Mary was a queen, and we know this because she is the mother of the King, who took the throne of David. In the Davidic Kingdom, who was the queen? The queen was always the MOTHER of the king! If you believe that Jesus is the Jewish King of the universe, sitting on the same throne as the kings of Israel, then you must believe that Mary is the queen. THIS is how theology is done. And yes, grace is an undeserved gift and it comes from God. Do you believe that Adam and Eve had undeserved favor from God when they were created and BEFORE they committed the original sin?? The answer is yes, they did. Adam and Eve were sinless and had grace. In fact, sin is what REMOVES you from a state of grace. When they sinned they fell from grace, and lost this original grace for all of mankind. But guess what! Jesus saved His own mother by creating her with this original grace/justice. Of course Mary needed a savior, and she was saved in a special, unique way due to her roll in God’s plan of salvation. Mary was saved by Jesus. And He saved her by creating her without sin, and keeping her sinless. She could not have done it without Him.
@ First, thanks for responding! I love healthy conversations about God. It’s up to us to study and search the scriptures for truth, and to understand our God, so let’s keep it respectful shall we? All too many times these devolve into mockery. That’s not what God wants and it’s not what I want. That being said,your claim that “Hail is only for royalty”? That’s reaching. “Hail” (chaire in Greek) literally means rejoice or greetings. It’s not a royal exclusive term, it’s just a common greeting in Scripture. Want proof? In Matthew 28:9, after the resurrection, Jesus greets the women with chaire, same word. Were they queens? Nope. It’s just how people talked. Now, onto the “queen mother” argument. Yes, in the Davidic kingdom, the mother of the king held a position of honor (like Bathsheba to Solomon in 1 Kings 2:19). But this doesn’t mean every king’s mother is automatically the queen. Jesus is unique. His kingdom isn’t like David’s or anyone else’s. It’s eternal, heavenly, and about redeeming all of humanity. He never calls Mary queen or assigns her that role. In fact, Scripture never hints at Mary ruling alongside Him. She’s honored, absolutely, but not enthroned. If theology requires this much backflipping, maybe it’s time to check the foundation. Now, let’s talk about Adam and Eve and grace. Yes, they were created sinless, and they had God’s favor before the fall. But there’s a big difference here, they were created in a state of innocence, while Mary was a descendant of Adam, born into the same sinful humanity as the rest of us. Romans 5:12 makes it clear, “Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned.” That’s all, no exceptions except Jesus. This idea that Jesus “saved Mary in advance” by creating her sinless? It’s clever, but it’s not biblical. Nowhere does Scripture say Mary was created without sin or kept sinless. In fact, Mary herself says in Luke 1:47, “My spirit rejoices in God my Savior.” If she needed a Savior, she wasn’t sinless. The very idea of needing salvation assumes there’s something to be saved from. And no, “special unique saving” isn’t in the text, it’s in the imagination of those trying to justify a dogma. Yes, Mary had grace, just like every believer has grace. She was highly favored because God chose her for an incredible role in His plan, not because she was sinless or royal. Mary’s greatness isn’t in her being a queen or a sinless superhuman. It’s in her humble submission to God’s will. She points to Christ, not to herself. That’s how theology is done, by sticking to what Scripture says, not what we wish it said. Let’s honor Mary the way Scripture does, as the blessed servant of God who carried our Savior. But let’s save the throne for the One who actually sits on it, Jesus Christ, the King of kings.
@ I’m sorry, my friend, but you have made many blunders here. First of all, while you are correct that the term ‘Hail’ is indeed a joyful greeting (I never said it wasn’t), the Greek word ‘Chaire’ is NOT the word used in Matthew 28:9! The word used is ‘Chairete’ which is the COMMAND form of Hail in Greek. What this means is that, when Jesus appeared to these women, He was NOT hailing them, He was commanding them to Hail Him, which is exactly what they did, because the verse goes on to say that they grabbed His feet and WORSHIPPED Him! The word ‘chaire’ IS used in Luke 1:28, and it’s only used 4 other times in the New Testament - and every single one of those times is for JESUS! What this means is that the word Chaire is EXCLUSIVE to ONLY Jesus and MARY! Check the Greek concordance for Chaire. Another blunder you’ve made is saying that every king’s mother was not automatically the queen. This is false. The mother of the king was ALWAYS the queen! Read 1 Kings 2:13-25, 11:26, 14:21, 15:1-2, 10, 13, 22:42, 2 Kings 10:13, 24:8-12, Jeremiah 13:18, 29:2. Every single time that a new king of Israel and/or Judah is mentioned, his queen mother is always mentioned! They reigned together! The Kingdom of Jesus Christ IS like the Kingdom of David. Christ is the King of the Jews just like David was. The Bible says that Christ’s kingdom is the fulfillment and CONTINUATION of the Davidic Kingdom (Mark 11:10; Luke 1:31-33). Christ’s kingdom has EVERYTHING that the Davidic Kingdom had, in its fulfilled form. This INCLUDES the queen mother! Pointing out that Jesus never called Mary a queen, but that’s an irrelevant argument from silence, which ultimately doesn’t work because the Bible DOES refer to the mother of Jesus as a queen in Revelation 12! She has the CROWN of 12 stars on her head, and she is the mother of all who believe in the messiah! This is called the typological reading of Scripture - reading the New Testament in light of the Old . When you read the New Testament like a JEW, you get Catholicism! Your theology divorces the New Covenant from its Jewish roots. Are you saying that God isn’t powerful enough to create anyone without sin after Adam and Eve? Is God not capable of doing such a thing? See, Mary was indeed saved from sin, but she was saved by being kept from falling into sin in the first place. When we sin, Jesus saves us from pulling us out of sin. Mary would have been born into sin, but Jesus saved her by creating her with the original grace/justice that Adam and Eve had. So Jesus did save Mary, but He saved her by preventing her from ever falling into sin, which Jude 1:24 says God can do. Whether He saves someone by pulling them out of sin or by preventing them from falling into sin, He still saved them. Mary needed a savior because she WOULD have been born with original sin had Jesus not intervened. He saved her from all sin, including original sin. And I explain the Biblical basis for this in this video. And I agree that we should honor Mary the way scripture says we should! Do you call Mary your mother??? Because John 19 and Revelation 12 calls her the mother of the Church. If you don’t consider Mary your mother, then you are NOT honoring her the way Scripture says we should. In fact, you are dishonoring Christ Himself, who, in His very last act before dying on the cross, gave us His mother to be our own.
@ Alright, my friend, I hear you loud and clear about the “Hail” debate. You’re saying that in Matthew 28:9, Jesus wasn’t greeting the women but commanding them to hail Him, and they did worship Him because, well, He’s the risen Son of God. Fair enough. But in Luke 1:28, when the angel greets Mary with “chaire,” it’s still just a joyful salutation, not some declaration that Mary holds divine status alongside Jesus. You can’t see that you’re reading something into text that just isn’t there over a greeting? Angels would have known that Mary, like all men are God’s favored creation, made in His image, especially ones that are redeemed. Mary had faith, and was obviously saved by Jesus. His sacrifice covers all sin, even past sin before His crucifixion. So Mary was definitely royalty, just like every believer in Christ is called “heirs” “children of God”, “kings” and “royal priesthood”. So even if “hail” was only meant for royalty, it still fits in context because God made us royal. Mary was highly favored, blessed among women, but the key here is among women. The angel isn’t putting her on a pedestal as co-equal with Christ. The focus is always on what God has done through her, not on Mary herself. She’s honored, not deified. Also, I did a quick search in my interlinear Bible and I found a couple more. Acts 15:23 in a letter sent from the elders to gentiles uses chaire, and James 1:1 where he greets “the twelve tribes scattered across the nation”. Both times it’s translated as “greetings”. I also found many different examples outside of the Bible from that time period and region of “chaire” being used as a joyful greeting. Now, about this idea that every king’s mother was automatically the queen, I think you’re overstating things a bit. Sure, there’s precedent for the “queen mother” role in Israelite tradition, but not every single king had a reigning queen mother mentioned. Even in the cases where she’s honored, she doesn’t hold authority over the king. And comparing this to Christ’s kingdom gets tricky. Yes, His kingdom fulfills the Davidic promises, but Jesus flips the script in so many ways. He’s not a king like David, constrained by earthly traditions. He’s the King of Kings, reigning supreme over all creation. Nowhere in Scripture does He ever establish Mary as queen in His kingdom. You referenced Revelation 12, but that’s not a slam dunk for your argument. The woman in Revelation 12 is a symbolic figure, representing Israel or the Church, not exclusively Mary. The crown of twelve stars? That’s about the twelve tribes of Israel, not Mary’s personal coronation. Let’s be careful not to read into the text something that isn’t clearly there. I see where you’re going with the immaculate conception argument, but there’s a big assumption in play here. The Bible never says Mary was sinless. In fact, Mary herself says, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Luke 1:46-47). Why would she need a Savior if she were without sin? The idea that she was preemptively saved from sin isn’t biblical; it’s a theological invention. Jude 1:24, which you cited, is about God keeping believers from stumbling through His grace, not about creating someone sinless from birth. And while God is all-powerful and certainly could have created Mary sinless, the question is, did He? Scripture doesn’t teach that He did. It teaches that Jesus alone is sinless (2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Peter 2:22). As for John 19 and Revelation 12 calling Mary the mother of the Church, I think you’re stretching the text again. In John 19, Jesus entrusts Mary to John, not to establish her as the mother of all believers but to ensure she’s cared for after His death. It’s a personal, loving act. Revelation 12’s symbolism, as I mentioned earlier, isn’t about Mary. The Church doesn’t need a “mother” other than God Himself, who created and sustains it through Christ. Look, I’m not here to tear down your devotion. Mary’s story is beautiful, and her faith is inspiring. But devotion becomes dangerous when it shifts our focus away from Jesus. Christ is the center of our faith, the only mediator, the only King, the only Savior. Let’s honor Mary the way the Bible does, as a humble servant of the Lord who points us to Jesus, not as someone who competes for His glory.
Never did Jesus called Mary "MOTHER" but "WOMAN". Where in the bible did Jesus called Mary "Mother"? LUKE 8:19-21 ~ Now Jesus’ mother and brothers came to see him, but they were not able to get near him because of the crowd. 20 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to see you.” 21 He replied, “MY MOTHER AND BROTHERS ARE THOSE WHO HEAR GOD’S WORD AND PUT IT INTO PRACTICE.” Before Jesus turned the Jar into wine because Mary is leading Him to do miracle, Jesus said John 2:4 ~And Jesus said to her, "Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come." But remember, Jesus didn't disrespected Mary here, but Jesus followed, showing that even the time is not right, He can do miracles, for He is God and Human at the same time. Can God call His Creation "MOTHER"? John 19:26 ~When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son!" Now, how come MARY is the COREDEEMER of Christ? Did Mary got CRICIFIED? Did SHE DIED FOR OUR SINS? JOHN 14:6 ~ 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. In other word, GOD IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD.
@@dherpin4874 don't think to much, the Apostles didn't gave too much emphasis to Mary, have you ever read the entire bible? I'm not sure why Moses wrote Genesis 3:15 and is now causing confusion, but you should be aware that Jesus is the protagonist here. I believe that the verse is also mentioning Mary, but for Revelation 3:17, read the whole Revelation 3, it's not talking about Mary, I'm also not sure of the meaning, but it's not Mary, read. Revelation 12:5-6 ESV [5] She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne, [6] and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which she is to be nourished for 1,260 days. Is that child Jesus? I think it's not (edit: it might really be talking about Jesus and Mary, but not for us to pray or worship Mary, that's idolatry and lack of knowledge about what God did), but one thing is sure, this isn't literal. Don't you know that God hate people praying to the dead people? Jesus resurrected right? He is not dead, pray to Jesus, not to Mary or to any saints. He is our only mediator to God, I can't give time to finding verses. I apologize if you think I'm being rude, I'm also seeking truth, not because I'm confused, but because I'm accepting "Truth". If what's true is true, then why don't we accept it? Accepting Truth is important.
@@darrellperez1029 Have you read what I've commented? Jesus said that His "mother and brothers are those who hear God and put it into practice", now, can any woman call Jesus her Son? Not at all, because it's not literal. But Jesus denied Mary here. Matthew 12:48-50 But he replied to the man who told him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 And >>>STRETCHING OUT HIS HAND TOWARDS HIS DISCIPLES
Sort of, but because they don't believe in original sin. Many orthodox have something they call ancestral sin and do believe in the fallen nature of man.
Generally speaking, the EO deny a false version of the Catholic doctrine of original sin. If I may be so bold, I think that most of them, with careful thought and charitable reading of Catholic teaching, would come to agree with the actual doctrine of original sin. But yeah, since they reject that false version of original sin, they reject a faulty version of the Immaculate Conception as well.
They reject is because it was made into a Catholic Dogma. If you ask an Orthodox person if Mary was sinless and was there ever a time when she was not in God's grace, they will agree that Mary was both sinless and was always in God's grace. The funny part is that they object to Mary always being in God's grace through a special gift, but believe that all babies are born in God's grace as Catholics believe Mary was.
…Revelations 12:17 “And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”
Alright, let’s talk about Mary’s so-called perpetual virginity. First off, Ultimately this doctrine doesn’t really matter much to me either. What does my salvation have to do with whether Marry ever had relations with a man? It’s silly to think my standing with God relies on me believing this, but for truth and accuracy’s sake , and because these doctrines are used to justify actual heretical and salvific beliefs, let’s explore. The idea that Luke 1 shows Mary had taken a lifelong vow of virginity? That doesn’t hold water. When Mary says, “How can this be, since I know not man?” she’s simply pointing out that she and Joseph hadn’t been together yet. They were betrothed, sure, but in Jewish culture, that’s like being engaged. Committed to marriage but not living together or, you know, doing what married people do. If Mary had taken some radical lifelong vow of virginity, it begs the question “why even marry Joseph?” What was he signing up for? A chaste roommate situation? Doesn’t sound like something God would orchestrate. Now, about Judges 11 and Jephthah’s daughter, I get why that’s brought up, but let’s not overreach. Jephthah’s daughter says, “I will know not man” because she’s resigned to a tragic life of singleness due to her dad’s ill considered vow. That’s a completely different situation. Mary’s line, “I have known not man,” is present tense. She’s just explaining the current state of things. It’s not some coded declaration of a perpetual vow. And about Jesus’ brothers. Here we go. Yes, Matthew 13 names them. James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas. Then the claim is made that they aren’t really Mary’s kids but sons of some other Mary mentioned at the crucifixion, the wife of Clopas. Okay, but let’s not miss the forest for the trees here. The Bible repeatedly calls these guys Jesus’ brothers. Not “cousins,” not “close relatives,” but “adelphoi”which is the literal standard Greek word for brothers. Yes, the Greek language sometimes uses adelphoi more broadly, but context matters. Why would the people in Jesus’ hometown in Matthew 13 think these were Mary’s sons if they weren’t? Were they all just confused about who lived under one roof? Saying Greek has no words for other close family members is just wrong. The Bible does use specific terms. For example, in Colossians 4:10, Paul refers to Mark as “Barnabas’s cousin” using the Greek word anepsios, which means cousin. A quick search in my interlinear Bible app shows a bunch of examples. Luke 1:36 refers to Mary’s close relative Elizabeth with the word “suggenes”. Acts 23:16 Paul’s “nephew” is mentioned using the Greek huios tes adelphes” which literally translates to “son of his sister”. If the Gospel writers wanted to say Jesus’ brothers were actually cousins, they could’ve said it. But they didn’t, they used adelphoi, which in context, literally, and plainly read means brothers. The language is there, it’s just not supporting your claim. And if Mary were a perpetual virgin, why does Matthew 1:25 make it so clear that Joseph “knew her not until she had brought forth her firstborn son”? That “until” implies something changed afterward. It doesn’t say Joseph never knew her, it says he didn’t until Jesus was born. Your refutation of this argument is weak. What’s the first rule about reading scripture? Context context context Also, the term “firstborn” naturally implies there were more children to follow. You don’t call an only child the “firstborn,” do you? That would be weird. The real kicker is this, if the church is supposedly divinely inspired to believe Mary was a perpetual virgin, why doesn’t the Bible come out and say it? Why is this doctrine built on such a shaky stack of assumptions, linguistic gymnastics, and indirect arguments? You’d think something so central to Mary’s role would be crystal clear, but it’s not. What is clear is that Mary was an incredible woman who played a unique, God ordained role in bringing the Savior into the world. But perpetual virginity? That’s adding to Scripture, and last I checked, Revelation 22:18-19 had some strong words about that. I’ll continue my refutation of the rest of these dogmas tomorrow. Feel free to challenge.
@iggyantioch it's the same gospel that was preached by the apostles and prophets, in the Spirit of God, not in catholicism? Galatians 1:8-9! you need the Spirit of God to discern the Word of God, since he is a Spirit, and his word is Spiritual! Why catholics don't understand what being born again of the Spirit is all about? Since catholics read all about catholicism, read, "far from Rome, near to God!" About 50 priests that left the catholic church, some with over 20 years as priests! You decide after reading the book, and comparing that, with the catholic church, and what God has to say in the bible? 50 priests is just a drop in the bucket: there also many nuns and lay catholics that have also found the true meaning of salvation in Gods Word, not in the catholic church! Jesus was serious when he told Nicodemus, that, "you need to be born again, to see or enter into the kingdom of God!" That applies to all, not just Nicodemus?
@@louisvega-oe2sc Jesus told him to be born of water (baptism) and of spirit. But, how many Protestants throw out baptism as a sacrament? As a former Protestant who used to debate a lot of Catholics and Orthodox, what I found was that Protestantism is based on MANY false assumptions of what the Bible actually says. The only way to be Protestant is to remove the Bible from its historical and cultural background AND remove the underlying assumptions that the early Christians actually believed (which is why it isn't explicitly spelled out) and then reinterpret everything from a materialistic western mindset. Protestants are so hypocritical. They pick and choose what they want to believe from the early Church Councils in regard to the doctrines of the Holy Trinity and Jesus Christ's two natures (fully God, fully man) and say that they got it right, but anything that they don't agree with, they just throw it out and say that they got it wrong. I have seen many Protestants argue to atheists that the Councils of Rome or Carthage gave us the canon of the New Testament and they got that right. Yet, will then claim that the SAME councils also gave the canon of the Old Testament that included the 7 Deuterocanonical books that they removed somehow got the OT canon wrong. When you remove all evidence and explain away everything, its easy to come up with your own new version of Christianity that never existed before the 16th Century.
Cultural/language misunderstandings of modern western people. If you actually read the gospels and very early Christian history the 4 people listed (James, Joseph, Jude, Simeon) are cousins. This is also why even the first major Protestants (Luther, Calvin and Zwingli) all actually believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary.
@@fantasia55 Yes, they believe that Joseph was an old man and had kids from a prior marriage. This comes from an apocryphal source (Protoevangelium of James) that doesn't match up with the gospels and early Church history saying that they were cousins.
As a universalist in the vein as St Gregory or George MacDonald, I’d say there will be a time when Jesus will not have enemies, but obviously he will still reign over us. All of us.
God revealed his truth through the prophets, and there are no prophets since John, so anything considered truth after John would not be considered truth, so any teaching outside of what was revealed by the prophets should be tested against scripture, prima scriptura then tradition, there should be a paper or oral trail all the way back to the actual Apostles, there should not be a missing link between the Apostles and dogmas.
The idea that rejecting Marian dogmas makes one a heretic is, frankly, one of the most spiritually binding and unbiblical claims I’ve ever encountered. To say that my salvation hinges not on faith in Christ’s finished work on the cross but on whether I affirm traditions like the Immaculate Conception or the Assumption, doctrines not explicitly found in Scripture, is the very definition of heretical. It chains believers to an unchallengeable system that demands allegiance to man-made declarations, rather than the Word of God. Jesus never said, “Believe in Mary’s sinlessness or her bodily assumption, and you will be saved.” He said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Paul echoes this in Romans 10:9: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Nowhere in the Bible does it say, “Oh, and by the way, add a belief in Marian dogmas to the list or you’re out.” The very idea that my eternal standing before God could depend on affirming teachings that emerged centuries after the apostles walked the earth is not just unscriptural, it’s dangerous. It turns salvation into a theological minefield, where you must navigate extra-biblical doctrines to avoid condemnation. This undermines the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement and the clarity of the Gospel. When Paul warned against “another gospel” in Galatians 1:8, this is exactly the kind of thing he was talking about. Here’s the irony: those who insist on Marian dogmas accuse others of heresy, yet the real heresy lies in elevating these human traditions to salvific importance. It’s not faith in Christ plus a checklist of dogmas. It’s faith alone in Christ alone. If your system requires people to believe what Scripture doesn’t teach to avoid damnation, it’s no longer Christianity. It’s spiritual extortion. I love each and every one of you and hope you allow Christ to break those self imposed chains that drag you down and keep you bound to man and his tradition, and apart from Christ and His perfect word. ❤
I don't think the parallel to Judge 11 is equivalent. In Judge 11 of course she would remain a virgin if she would be then sacrifice. Also, not even in the Catholic Bible says the same words of know not man, so not sure why you say it says the same.
Well I just view the video again, and he does not say that in the Greek it says the exact same. He just say that it says the exact same, without specifying language.
@@joshuarivera2422 The Greek Septuagint was the OT that the early Christians used. Since the authors of the New Testament were Jews who thought as Jews, but were writing the NT in Greek it is helpful to see how Jewish thought is written in the Greek language.
@@georgepierson4920 All have sinned and fall short to the glory of God. And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, (Luke 1:46-47) If you are not a sinner. You don't need a savior.
@@FaithInChrist-l1i Is a "Savior" someone that saves people from SIN and nothing else? Or can the word "Savior" refer to someone who saves people from situations OTHER THAN SIN ?
I would love to have a sit down with you and ask you questions, don’t give your own opinions give chapter and verse that show evidence of your claims . We have to be careful not to add to the Bible, Please give literal evidence, you have not done that. Your arguments are not heavy!!!!!!!!!
Chapter and verse that say their are 27 boo,s in the new testament, you only know that because the Catholic church say so, none Catholic have no say, because all their church are man made
Calling Mary the “Mother of God” sounds noble, but it’s not quite accurate biblically and this is why. Mary is the mother of Jesus’ human nature, not His divine nature. Jesus has existed eternally as God the Son, He didn’t get His start in Mary’s womb. While Mary played a vital role in God’s plan by bringing Jesus into the world, she didn’t “create”, originate, or have anything to do with His divinity. It’s like this, if I build a house, you might call me the “mother” of the house’s design, but you wouldn’t call me the “mother of wood and bricks”. They existed before I started. Similarly, Mary contributed to Christ’s humanity, but she didn’t contribute to His eternal deity. The title “Mother of God” was historically used to affirm Jesus’ full divinity during early church debates, which is good because we all agree Jesus is fully God and fully man. But if you’re using it to elevate Mary to some quasi-divine status, nope, not biblical. Mary would be the first to point you back to her Son, saying, “Do whatever He tells you” (John 2:5). So, love and respect Mary? Absolutely! Worship or elevate her above her role? Hard pass. Only Jesus gets that glory. Now, Catholics will often say, “We don’t worship Mary, we venerate her.” But let’s be real, bowing, praying to her and statues of her, calling on her for help like she’s omnipresent, attributing salvific responsibility to her, and giving her titles like “Queen of Heaven” sure looks and smells like worship. If you’re doing things for Mary that you’d only do for God, it’s worship, no matter what you call it. Mary wouldn’t stand for it. Mary would point you straight to her Son Jesus, where all the glory belongs. Overall, I have the least amount of problem with this title as long as the goal is to say something about Christ, not Mary, and as long as my salvation does not rest (even in part) on wether or not I call her that, but as we can see, that’s exactly what has happened. This is why so many have a problem with it, because it’s therefore used to justify other Mariology. And let’s not get confused or distracted with the Nestorian heresy. That heresy is not what Protestants believe. That heresy said that Jesus was 2 separate people. No Protestant believes this. Christ is one person, who took human form through Mary. Fully God (not Mary) fully man (by God through Mary).
41:42 The joke normally says "I could just forgive you, but I'll kill my son to appease myself then I'll forgive you" but being theologicaly in depth the joke should say "Yes sin could've ended with Adam and Eve but it didn't so what I'll do is I'll create one sinless woman, then she'll have a son, which is my son, which is me, and I'll have him die for your sins so I could possibly forgive you" This video wasn't a waste of time.
The Voice of Reason, made me become Byzantine Catholic. I was Eastern Orthodox for most of my Christian life after I left the Jehovah's Witness organization. When I first saw his video on the Rosary in like early 2023, I was hooked. And during the middle of the summer, I decided to convert, and now I'm a Melkite Byzantine Catholic as of late September. Thank you Alex.
Glory to Jesus Christ!
Sounds like you were just weak in your faith is wondered around the way you did
I'm currently talking with a girl who is JW. What specifically encouraged you to leave the church despite being excommunicated and shunned by everyone in the church? What specifically motivated you to come to Catholicism? Thanks!
@@SuperJosh-rs6kp What lead me away from JW's is really just the fact that I got less serious about it over time. My grandmother tried to hook me on to it again but I was more into this non-denominational form of Christianity. But that phase didn't last long until I looked into Church History and invested most of my time in getting books (which thankfully I've gotten into classic literature due to this). And what kept my away from going back into the kingdom's hall is the denial of the Trinity, the denial of Hell, and the majority of weird doctrines such as a literal reading of Revelation 7&14 concerning the 144k. Not to mention the belief that Michael is Jesus, denial of blood transfusions, and many of the failed prophesies.
Our Lady is the most amazing thing God has given us, I'm fully convinced it was apart of his mission, as John 19:26-28 shows that our Lady was given to St. John, and Jesus said all was finished. Our Lady's last words in Scripture is found in John 2:5 saying "do whatever he tells you" in context of Jesus, and the last words of Jesus concerning Mary is John 19:27, being "behold your Mother!" Mostly I have faith that the Miraculous Medal and the Rosary is what was used by God to convert me back to the Church. I visited this one church that was very famous in my culture (Cuban), based on the apparition the "Caridad del Cobre" with my Catholic side of the family, which is the side I was mostly raised by, I bought some sacramentals there, including a chaplet with the miraculous medal. I have 100% conviction that the little piece of metal, the Miraculous Medal, was a piece of matter that God used as a communication of grace to me.
@@certaincyril Thank you so much for the reply! Is there any topic that you would recommend I focus on in trying to convert her? It's really difficult in trying to understand what is *really* going on in the organization so thats why I love coming to people who have experienced it first hand.
You are an incredible teacher! Thank you for all that you do to educate us better on the Catholic faith. ❤️🇨🇦
BRO IS A WALKING CATECHISM FOR OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST
You helped me become Catholic
Me too. At least he was apart of it.
Same here
Welcome home
He help strengthen my faith
YESSSS
Alex was a Huge part of my journey into the faith. I'm now a devout catholic who attends traditional mass & prays the rosery ! I remember seeking for more knowledge & wisdom , I believe God is using you ! ♡
You helped me take my faith seriously thank you. I’m a cradle catholic who didn’t have great guidance in my faith
This is one of the best teachings I’ve watched defending the Marian Dogmas.
It all started for me on this Catholic journey when my eyes were opened to “behold your mother, Woman behold your Son”That verse was never in my Bible until one day it sneaked in and caught my attention.
Since then it’s been an amazing journey and growing deeper in my love for Jesus by falling deeper in love with his Mother. “Rather blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it” Mary helps us hear the word of God and keep it!
God bless your ministry bro!
So true, it was these dogmas that brought me to my first Mass, when I was walking up to the Church I saw a statue of our Blessed Mother and I just knew I was home in that moment.
These videos are SOOOO helpful. Please continue making educational videos so we can all learn more. Ever since your videos came across my TikTok I have been wanting to get closer to my faith. Thanks Alex!! 🙏🏽
Two voice of reason videos in a row!?!? Lets go!!!
Thank you for the great video on our Blessed Mother! It was her intercession in my life that brought me to know our Lord last year. Praise be to God, and thanks for the constant great videos! God bless brother!
You helped me on my journey to Catholicism and it’s videos like this that open your eyes and make things make perfect sense 📿✝️
This is probably the best explanation/defense of the Marian dogmas that I am ever heard. Well done!
You remind me alot of my confirmation teacher, well done indeed.
Hail Mary full of grace 🙏🏻🇻🇦
Appreciate your teaching in this format with the youth. Poor Catechesis has been the plague in the Catholic church for decades now. These young minds are blessed. Thank you and keep it up. Humbly and diligently. God bless.
Currently in mystagogia and this is by far the best and most thorough video I have seen on the Marian Dogmas. This has made it very clear to me. Thank you!
Hi @Whispn, I'm sorry to say that Voice of Reason is blind, and carrying people that is also blind.
2 Timothy 4:3-4 ~ 3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound[a] teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
Let me help you. I really care, I hope everyone can read this, but I'll comment only on few people so I will not be reported.
Never did Jesus called Mary "MOTHER" but "WOMAN". Where in the bible did Jesus called Mary "Mother"?
LUKE 8:19-21 ~ Now Jesus’ mother and brothers came to see him, but they were not able to get near him because of the crowd. 20 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to see you.”
21 He replied, “MY MOTHER AND BROTHERS ARE THOSE WHO HEAR GOD’S WORD AND PUT IT INTO PRACTICE.”
Before Jesus turned the Jar into wine because Mary is leading Him to do miracle, Jesus said
John 2:4 ~And Jesus said to her, "Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come."
But remember, Jesus didn't disrespected Mary here, but Jesus followed, showing that even the time is not right, He can do miracles, for He is God and Human at the same time. Can God call His Creation "MOTHER"?
John 19:26 ~When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son!"
Now, how come MARY is the COREDEEMER of Christ? Did Mary got CRICIFIED? Did SHE DIED FOR OUR SINS?
JOHN 14:6 ~ 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
In other word, GOD IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD.
Hey Brother! Catholic here, was scrolling to comments and seeing yours, you seem really caring for the truth and not spreading hate, so let me reply to your points, just have a discussion between brothers in Christ.
First off no Catholic believe that Mary is Our Saviour, what we say is that Mary has a great role in our redemption thanks to her "yes" to the angel Gabriel, and that is just fact, may I ask you what you believe would have happen if Mary says "no" to the angel in that occasion? Just curious, but beeing said that nobody remove nothing to the glory of Our Saviour.
Now you actually made a great point when pointing out the Jesus call Mary "Woman", have you ever ask yourself why? Was Jesus disrespecting her in the wedding on Cana and on the cross? Nope!
What you see actually is part of a beautiful redemption plan created by God! In fact the very 2 chapters of the Gospel of John are echoing the 7 days creation described in Genesis! Take a look at it please, you see in the Gospel of John on very first chapter "In the beginning" exactly like in Genesis, then following by "on the next day" and again "on the next day", and again, dipinting the 4 days of creation. Then you got to Chapter 2 and what you see? "On the third day that was a wedding" there we go, 4 days described in the first chapter and now on the 3 day a wedding, 4 + 3 seven days of creation! And like you have said Jesus (the new Adam as we know) call Mary "Woman", John is actually describing Mary as the new and greater Eve and just like the original one Mary was conceived sinless, and Our Blessed Mother never fall!
This wasn't really debated for the early christians, please have a read on this:
answeringislamblog.wordpress.com/2022/09/19/early-church-on-mary-as-the-new-and-greater-eve/
Then we believe that Mary is the new Ark, have you ever hear a Catholic says that? Strange to hear it for a lot of our protestant brother but we do have the bible and read it too! 😁 Here is why, full of bible verses that you can check:
www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/mary-the-ark-of-the-new-covenant
We also believe that Mary is the queen of Heaven, and not the egyptian pagan "god" described in the OT full of sin, but the queen mother of the Davidic Kingdom! Jesus is king and He is in David genealogy like we know on Mattew 1, so therefore Mary is the queen mother!
Please have a look here:
www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-marys-queenship-biblical
It is important and I really care to tell to all of my brothers in Christ that everything that the Catholic Churvh believe as far as Mary is following up by everything all Christian believe as far as Jesus.
I'm not here to debate brother, you seem to care about truth so I take my time to try to make this case clear, please let me know what you think about this and God bless you
@Axlandros thanks for the comment. As of now, I have other things and plan to do, but I'll get back at checking those links and then comment back to you. I'll screenshot this, so in case I forget, I can remember ♥️.
@jonathanjundarino2985 Pray for you brother, good luck with your research! 😁
Thank you bro. That was amazing video
Ave Maria Gratia Plena Dominus Tecum. God bless you Alex, be blessed brother.
An excellent talk on our Blessed Mother! Thanks so much Alex. 🙏✝️
"For he took notice of his lowly servant girl, and from now on all generations will call me blessed."
Luke 1:48
"And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?"
Luke 1:43
Shalom from Malaysia
Im a EO convert, but I love your talks. This was a fabulous discussion in Mary.
So many questions. I feel like the more I try to find answers, the more questions I have. With all of the noise and interpretations, how can we find truth?
Apostolic succession brother, please look for the early church fathers, there is a great book named "the fathers know best" by Jimmi Akin, totally recommend it.
And if you're looking for catholicism please read the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the official teachings of the church, full of bible references and everything for support.
Let me know if I can help you with something specific, and God bless you.
Always offer you struggles to God at the foot of the cross, trusting that He will guide you where you need when your soul (not your emotions) need to be guided. Prayerfully trust Him.
Thanks Alex for your awesome hospitality you are bringing lots of lost souls back to the one true church founded by God himself through his apostle’s Peter right all the way through to Pope Francis love you bro 🇼🇸☦️🫂
Thanks!
Lovely preach God bless you. Hope you keep going.
Thank You Bro Alex for the work you are doing.
I greatly appreciate your teachings especially regarding these 4 Marian Dogmas.
This session make me know much deeper into these Marian dogmas , and love our Catholic Church more n more.
May Our Lord And His/ Our Blessed Mother Bless and Protect You Always 🙏🏻
Thank you Alex for all your amazing videos. I pray I become as knowledgeable as you to help others come into the faith ❤ I’d like to become a Catechist and teach Children one day 🙏🏼
Yes,very clearly explained.Thank you sir.❤❤❤
Hey Voice of Reason, could you make a video talking about Ethiopian Orthodoxy and the Orientals? They have many claims to supposedly having relics (the true Cross, the holy prepuce, and the Ark of the Covenant) and would like to hear your thoughts, along with their miaphysitism.
I’m only 6 minutes in and I can already see the spiritual chains. So heavy they make me tired! Lol
In all seriousness, please Catholics. Find your freedom in His grace. He died for it, honor it. ❤
@@artax7664 watch the rest of the video 👀😂🤣
@ working on it.
@@VoiceOfReason_ I feel compelled to respond to your points. I’ll do them in individual posts to keep it organized. I want to let you know that my intention is nothing but respect and love for Catholics and all men, but I do like to get a little spicy and blunt sometimes, and I do like to joke, but never disrespect or mockery from me. My goal is to learn and be learned from, and to lead all men to truth in Christ. ❤
Jesus was fully God and fully man manifested in the flesh first Timothy 3:16
Fact! Jesus still IS fully God and fully man tho. So is Mary the Mother of God? The one who as manifested in the flesh?
Neither of the Timothys or Titus are genuine Pauline letters.
@@Axlandros if so Jesus didn't think so and definitely didn't act like it. And also why does Mary say she needs a Savior if she was sinless.
@@chris20874 Hello! Can I ask you why do you think Jesus didn't think that and didn't act like it?
Matthew 1:22-23: All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: "The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel" (which means "God with us").
Therefore I would say that if you deny the title "Mother of God" to Mary you're denying the name Immanuel, you can't separate Jesus divinity and His human nature, He is one person, and He is God, so we got the virgin (Mary) give birth to the Immanuel through the Holy Spirit.
Mary call Jesus her Saviour because He still is the Saviour of the world and because through Him and for her role she has been preserved from the original sin by God, this is demonstrable by the very title in which the angel address her as "full of grace", that verb speak volumes in his greek form "Kecharitomene" literally means "completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace", I can give you some resources to check if you want to to verify that, Mary is also seeing as the "new Eve" who like the original one was preserved by sin until the fall, yet Mary never sin because of her fullness of grace. There are also early christian writings who confirmed that Mary was seeing as being perfectly grace from the beginning.
I love it! 🙏🏼🕊️❤️💙🕊️🙏🏼
As a muslim, I learn a lot about Christianity from you. Thanks so much.
That's not Christianity, that's Catholic. Catholics are not Christians, they are heretic. But there are some that are being converted to Christianity.
@@jonathanjundarino7784wow never seen someone so ignorant
@@Emet315 I've seen a lot of you also, specially here. People who don't know the word of God. People who've never cared about the Bible. If teachings and doctrine are not aligned with the bible, then that's the true heretic. Early christians diverted biblical teachings, and Catholicism is the result. Read Corinthians and Timothy, then you will know that.
@@Emet315 I'm not sure, can you see my first comment? It seems to have been deleted. I'll say it again for @SyafiqHadzir, Catholicism is not Christianity. There are 40,000+ denominations claiming to be christians, how can we identify true Christianity? There's no right denomination, but only the right relationship with God.
2 Timothy 3:16 ~ all Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness
@@jonathanjundarino7784 Hi, I know you mean well when you say all this and you believe you are spreading the truth. I appreciate that but this is the wrong comment section to be talking about this. There are other videos where you can post your comments. Please don’t try to disrespect other people here.
Wow!
The ark of the covenant was beautiful. The bud of our high priest, the word of god and the bread of life all in our heavenly ark.
Mary hadn't known Joseph yet that's why Mary said that. The Bible said that Joseph didn't "know" her until after Jesus was born. Also this happened after Mary spoke to the angel so Joseph hadn't taken her to be his wife yet.
"And Joseph awoke from his sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took Mary as his wife, but kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a Son; and he called His name Jesus." ~Matthew 1:24-25 (NASB)
thank u alex...
I went to a Baptist Church once and they had a sermon mentioning the "brothers" of Jesus. I've heard the Adelphos argument but I don't think they agree with what it means
I was trained by Mary to be a Holy man
You're helping a confused Christian out.
Go back to the historic confessions of Protestantism. Rome has no gospel to offer but earning salvation by works
Great talk Alex
Thanks much for this video.
Ok, so, I totally agree that Mary is the mother of God. And that being said, I can agree that she is the mother of hus divinity too, because he us divine and he was in her womb. Now, that is not to say that his divinity originates from Mary, correct?
No, she is not the source of Jesus's divinity. It's just to recognize the fact that she gave birth to the fully God and fully man Jesus.
Voice of deepness 😂
AMAZING VIDEO
Beautiful brother Alex
Beautiful explanations ✝️
Not all Bibles are the same, some added some took away from the scripture, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, holy man, chosen by God to write his story, to give us love, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost, salvation
You do such great work
Yes, you can sin we have free will to be obedient to God‘s word or not
The Roman Empire became a religion, never went away...
Revelation 17:5 Authorized Version
And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.
Revelation 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
As a Catholic, I do not question the dogma or doctrine, including the perpetual virginity of Mary, the Mother of God. However, my question is: Why would a girl, devout to a life of virginity get married?
Does it not make more sense, that she would remain a virgin because of her discovered holiness?
2 Timothy 3:16-17 ~ 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
If you have doubts, seek God through the "Word of God", scripture. If something is not written or cannot be backed up with the bible, and it's talking about God, then it is not worth learning, because any conclusion outside or cannot be supported by the scriptures will fall to wrong. But one this is sure, anything that opposes the Scriptures is sure wrong, because it's not vice versa.
Marriages were arranged back then and were a social contract. They were not done out of romantic love as we think of a marriage today. So, there could be many reasons why a girl would be betrothed to someone that had taken a vow. The other important aspect is that St. Joseph agreed with her vow of celibacy.
Wow I had no idea that I've called a lot of women, woman... I've been declaring them sinless this whole time.
Why did God wait 400 years to tell us that the Bible isn't really accurate when it comes to Mary?
46:14 You said by mistake Jude 1:28, is Jude 1:24, there are only 25 verses in Jude.
“Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, And to present you faultless Before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy, To God our Savior, Who alone is wise, Be glory and majesty, Dominion and power, Both now and forever. Amen.”
Jude 1:24-25 NKJV
Ok so on the cross Jesus gives Mary to John because he wanted John to take care of her since there was no one else. Not because Jesus wanted Mary to be the mother of all of us, right?
The Blessed Virgin Mary is the Mother of all Christians and the Queen of Heaven. Hail Mary Full of Grace.
Nobody goes to hell because of "original sin" they go to hell because they don't believe in Jesus who takes away all our sin.
She was under the old covenant until Jesus died on the cross
No. She is the mother of the new covenant.
Thank you for sharing this dogma. God bless you 🙏
Woah Mary was the mother of the new Adam and also the wife of the new Adam? This is a little crazy.
I just bought a Lady of Perpetual help and I feel very happy about it. 😊
The Sly Apologist strikes again!
No not sly Sly, but Sylvester Sly Stallone!
His name was John the Baptist , the last prophet, besides Jesus Christ
Does the immaculate conception not take away Mary's free will then? Whats the argument against that.
Hello brother or sister in christ ! That's because the marian dogma is unfortunately unbiblical. I'm watching the video, but I'm pretty positive I heard it all already.
Guy makes a lot of baseless claims about dogmas.
If the Marian dogma was biblical, I would have absolutely no problem with it.
If transsubstantiation was biblical (real presence) I would have no problem with it.
If Faith + works was biblical, I would have zero problem with it.
I follow the Bible. Because the Roman Catholic church has been far, very far, from being infallible.
The Assumption wasn't even a dogma before the XX° century, if I remember correctly.
We cannot hold on to 2 millenias of tradition without having actual evidence that it really comes from Jesus.
@shadowdepths2486 Hello my fellow brethren in Christ. Thanks for replying. Its my understanding that the early church held transubstantiation as true and I think it is biblical "this IS my body and my blood". Now do I believe it is the physical body or the spiritual body? I don't know and it doesn't necessarily matter to me, all I know is I should treat it with extreme reverence. All the Marian dogmas are not biblical I agree. Some of them have a basis in Scripture but not explicitly stated. But I'm in the process of learning the Early Church's opinions on them and it seems perpetual virginity is correct at the least. The other Dogmas, I don't know yet. I instinctively have an aversion to the immaculate conception but I'm in the process of following the evidence then coming to a conclusion. All of this comes down to whatever the Early Church held as true to me as they learnt directly from Jesus and the disciples. Also I believe that the issue Protestants have with Catholics about faith plus works comes down to intentional obstinance or a misunderstanding of what Catholics understand of Grace. If you asked them they will say they believe in salvation through Grace. They don't believe that you having to cooperate with grace makes it works based. Unless I'm wrong and a Catholic corrects me. I'm learning more about the Catholic and Orthodox faith at the moment with a particular interest in the early Church as I reckon learning what the disciples of the Disciples did after Jesus's death in terms of how they worshipped is going to be as close to the fullness of the truth as I can get. Thats my honest thoughts. ❤️✝️
The angel of God came to Mary and when she was told what was going to happen she said let it be as you've said. So she chose to do it. Having said that she was just a devout woman who followed and obeyed God.
Alex, if you Google catholic dogmas, you get a list of 255 dogmas. I read them and the list seems ok to me. But, the church has no official list of dogmas. Obviously, it knows its own dogmas. Why doesnt it publish an official list? I wish it would. I want to know them.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, purchase it! It has all the dogmas.
@@guadalupeflores738 Yes, a person can get a used copy in brand new condition for around $5.00
But Jesus hadn't taken Mary in so why would He have to give her to the next oldest son?
If we talk about Mary, shouldn't we be praising Marys mother too?
We do. Saints Joachim and Anne, Mary’s parents feast day, is celebrated on July 26th each year.
It’s talking about the church, the God of Israel, the 12 tribes
early!
guys i was born CATHOLIC but always been lukewarm or I DIDN'T believe in Jesus, but recently comes home to Jesus CHRIST. I want to get baptised, my question is should I get baptised because I was baptised when i was baby. and the Catholic believes that 1 baptism only.
Edit: I think I got the answer that I needed, in Catholic only one time baptism is needed, as long as the formula is "in the name of the FATHER, SON, and HOLY spirit. 1 God, 1 baptism.
if you had a Catholic baptism, you shouldn't be re-baptized. Talk with a priest to discuss your formal return to the faith. Look up "MassTimes", very helpful for finding a church in your area. God bless you in your journey, friend.
You're correct that many believe in one baptism. If you were baptized as an infant in the Catholic Church, that baptism is considered valid because your parents and godparents made that commitment on your behalf. However, if you haven't received your confirmation yet, you'll need to complete that sacrament. It's always best to talk to a priest for guidance, as they have the authority to provide the right advice. Please, I'm not a priest, so it's important to seek their counsel for what steps you should take next.
@sabesansakthivelautham5421 thank you for information Godblesa you brother and glory to JESUS Christ! ❤️✝️
In the Bible you would get baptized after you've repented and have chosen to follow Christ. If you've done that then yes you should get baptized especially if God is putting it your heart.
"took flesh from her"? A Baby doesn't take flesh from the mother the baby is a separate human from the start and grows it's own flesh. Baby it's just worded wrong.
37:05 i cant find the verse in Jude
If he misspoke (which he also did with Judges) can someone put it please?
@@jakezuloaga3871 I think he is referencing Jude 1:24 "Now to him who is able to preserve you without sin, and to present you spotless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, in the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, "
It's Jude 1:24
"To him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy"
@@ealdorman5053 thank you
It is actually Judges 11 34-40 that speaks of “ Not Know a man”. This is actually fascinating as several other passages in these verses can correlate to the New Testament in particular to the Father making the Vow for her daughter.
I’m coming home to Rome! ✝️⛪️
Let's go!!🎉
Are my comments being deleted or hidden?
I am seeing a good bit of them.
@@dherpin4874hi, I'm not sure why I can't see my comments or can't send there anymore. I'll get back to your comment tomorrow, maybe around or earlier than 24 hours.
@@dherpin4874
These are what you've said:
"Why would you presume saint here on earth that can pray for us would once they enter into “greater” glory no longer be able to pray for us?..........."
First, who are the saints? Acts 9:32, and many other bible verses, there are many alive saints, they are the people who've consecrated their life to Christ. Unlike Catholic Church, they only select very few saints, and one of the conditions is to be physically dead. You believe that God already written the names of the saved in the book of life, correct? In case not, Revelation 13:8. The moment those people written in the book of life accepted Christ; they are already saints, not because they are sinless, but because Jesus already cleaned them for once. Jesus isn't cleaning us every time we sin, He did it once, Hebrews 7, this is another mistake of the Catholic, since they don't know this. In case Catholic know this, please don't be angry with me, I'm just ignorant about what Catholic beliefs are.
Now, regarding the question, I'll ask back. Where did the idea come from that they can hear our prayers? Did they become omnipresent like God? Matthew 6:20 tells us that there will be no rust, no theft, etc. meaning, people will no longer need to worry. Although there are no sins in heaven, are they going to see murder, theft, rape, carnal prayers, deceptive prayers and so much more? Did God give them powers to do that? First of all, we do not truly know, but if you are going to ask me, I believe that God will not give us that power, for He alone is enough.
About 1 Corinthians 12, let's not talk about this, because it will be very big, but this I can assure you, Protestants believe in these, but only for the time of the Apostles, while there are some Protestants who believe that God is using people to do those miracles until now. But all protestant believes that God is still doing miracles, again, the context of the 1 Corinthians 12 are the spiritual "gifts". About my stand, I will not say it, because whether I believe or not, truth remains truth.
let's skip other things about Lazarus, Greater, lesser, etc., because I believe that they are already answered. If not, you can ask me again, but please make it small, because it may really require a lot of time, and I'm answering this on my free time (you are welcome to ask, of course!!!).
About Luke 2:35 ~ First, we need to know the context,
Luke 2:33-35
33 And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him. 34 And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, “Behold, this child is appointed for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is opposed 35 (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also), so that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
This verses talks about Jesus suffering,
About Luke 2:35, who are those "many"? also, why "may" and not "will"? Because it is talking to the inner thoughts of the people who have hidden motives, those people who would like to kill Jesus, another one that has been revealed is Peter really didn't believe Christ about the Resurrection, remember the 3x sound of the chicken representing Peter 3x denial?
Also this John 16:19-22 ~ 19 Jesus saw that they wanted to ask him about this, so he said to them, “Are you asking one another what I meant when I said, ‘In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me’? 20 Very truly I tell you, you will weep and mourn while the world rejoices. You will grieve, but your grief will turn to joy. 21 A woman giving birth to a child has pain because her time has come; but when her baby is born she forgets the anguish because of her joy that a child is born into the world. 22 So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy.
hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/34697/in-luke-235-what-is-meant-by-so-that-thoughts-from-many-hearts-may-be-revealed
This link might be helpful.
Sorry, but I will never believe anything that is not in the bible.
2 Timothy 3:16-17~ "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." The bible is complete. Who received the old testament? It was the Jews right? It is holy to them, and not just tradition, because that's their reference of what is correct, not sure about now, since people in Israel departed from God and they also don't believe Jesus. Now New Testament is the revelation of God (Not just the book or Revelation, but the whole New Testament.) The bible is complete, it is sufficient.
Ephesians 2:20 tells that Christianity is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. If we still have Apostles and Prophets, does it mean that the foundation of Christianity is in the process of building? No, because there's no prophets and apostles now, anyone who claim to be prophet and apostles are not coming from God, but of the enemy.
@@dherpin4874 can you see my long comment? I'm really gonna be sad if you can't see it. Cause I can't see it, But there's a sign that it was sent, this really makes me sick. I spent time...
Oh, I can see it.
this only confuses me more
What part is confusing to you? Or are you just a shit stirrer?
Why?
@presleymathurin5836 because all he could do is add words on the bible and twist it, no offense I realy like Alex but this is getting more confusing. And ir feels like I have to accept it in oder to understand when the word of God says otherwise
@ which words did he add?
@@danieldossantosvalenca1163you don’t have to accept another person’s teaching. Read the Bible on your own
54:44. I’m sorry this right here is a bit of a lame argument. What do you mean, what do you do with Jesus ?😂 Like hello, the whole point of Romans 3 was to tell people they needed a saviour and that everyone has fallen short, hence it’s understood that the passage doesn’t include Jesus. Plus He’s sinless since He is God ! That passage is obviously referring to the whole of humanity which includes Mary!
P.S: Have a look at Luke 11:27-28 while you’re at it. Take care and God bless friend ✝️
Good luck in looking for the immaculate conception, the assumption, or perpetual virginity
@@martingatt94 I guess you haven’t watched the video yet 😏
You’er a second person in your Godhead died?
Hail, to greet. Grace, undeserved gift.
“Greetings Mary, who has been given the fullness of God’s undeserved gift”
She rejoiced in God HER Savior. Why did she need a savior if she was sinless from the start?
You mentioned she was royalty. Mary had faith, she was a child of God just like us in Christ. We are also called royalty.
@@artax7664 Hail is a greeting given only to royalty. Can you give any example from scripture of any other Christian being greeted with ‘Hail’? No, you can’t, because it doesn’t exist. Mary was a queen, and we know this because she is the mother of the King, who took the throne of David. In the Davidic Kingdom, who was the queen? The queen was always the MOTHER of the king! If you believe that Jesus is the Jewish King of the universe, sitting on the same throne as the kings of Israel, then you must believe that Mary is the queen. THIS is how theology is done.
And yes, grace is an undeserved gift and it comes from God. Do you believe that Adam and Eve had undeserved favor from God when they were created and BEFORE they committed the original sin?? The answer is yes, they did. Adam and Eve were sinless and had grace. In fact, sin is what REMOVES you from a state of grace. When they sinned they fell from grace, and lost this original grace for all of mankind. But guess what! Jesus saved His own mother by creating her with this original grace/justice. Of course Mary needed a savior, and she was saved in a special, unique way due to her roll in God’s plan of salvation. Mary was saved by Jesus. And He saved her by creating her without sin, and keeping her sinless. She could not have done it without Him.
@ First, thanks for responding! I love healthy conversations about God. It’s up to us to study and search the scriptures for truth, and to understand our God, so let’s keep it respectful shall we? All too many times these devolve into mockery. That’s not what God wants and it’s not what I want.
That being said,your claim that “Hail is only for royalty”? That’s reaching. “Hail” (chaire in Greek) literally means rejoice or greetings. It’s not a royal exclusive term, it’s just a common greeting in Scripture. Want proof? In Matthew 28:9, after the resurrection, Jesus greets the women with chaire, same word. Were they queens? Nope. It’s just how people talked.
Now, onto the “queen mother” argument. Yes, in the Davidic kingdom, the mother of the king held a position of honor (like Bathsheba to Solomon in 1 Kings 2:19). But this doesn’t mean every king’s mother is automatically the queen. Jesus is unique. His kingdom isn’t like David’s or anyone else’s. It’s eternal, heavenly, and about redeeming all of humanity. He never calls Mary queen or assigns her that role. In fact, Scripture never hints at Mary ruling alongside Him. She’s honored, absolutely, but not enthroned. If theology requires this much backflipping, maybe it’s time to check the foundation.
Now, let’s talk about Adam and Eve and grace. Yes, they were created sinless, and they had God’s favor before the fall. But there’s a big difference here, they were created in a state of innocence, while Mary was a descendant of Adam, born into the same sinful humanity as the rest of us. Romans 5:12 makes it clear, “Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned.” That’s all, no exceptions except Jesus.
This idea that Jesus “saved Mary in advance” by creating her sinless? It’s clever, but it’s not biblical. Nowhere does Scripture say Mary was created without sin or kept sinless. In fact, Mary herself says in Luke 1:47, “My spirit rejoices in God my Savior.” If she needed a Savior, she wasn’t sinless. The very idea of needing salvation assumes there’s something to be saved from. And no, “special unique saving” isn’t in the text, it’s in the imagination of those trying to justify a dogma.
Yes, Mary had grace, just like every believer has grace. She was highly favored because God chose her for an incredible role in His plan, not because she was sinless or royal. Mary’s greatness isn’t in her being a queen or a sinless superhuman. It’s in her humble submission to God’s will. She points to Christ, not to herself. That’s how theology is done, by sticking to what Scripture says, not what we wish it said.
Let’s honor Mary the way Scripture does, as the blessed servant of God who carried our Savior. But let’s save the throne for the One who actually sits on it, Jesus Christ, the King of kings.
@ I’m sorry, my friend, but you have made many blunders here.
First of all, while you are correct that the term ‘Hail’ is indeed a joyful greeting (I never said it wasn’t), the Greek word ‘Chaire’ is NOT the word used in Matthew 28:9! The word used is ‘Chairete’ which is the COMMAND form of Hail in Greek. What this means is that, when Jesus appeared to these women, He was NOT hailing them, He was commanding them to Hail Him, which is exactly what they did, because the verse goes on to say that they grabbed His feet and WORSHIPPED Him!
The word ‘chaire’ IS used in Luke 1:28, and it’s only used 4 other times in the New Testament - and every single one of those times is for JESUS! What this means is that the word Chaire is EXCLUSIVE to ONLY Jesus and MARY! Check the Greek concordance for Chaire.
Another blunder you’ve made is saying that every king’s mother was not automatically the queen. This is false. The mother of the king was ALWAYS the queen! Read 1 Kings 2:13-25, 11:26, 14:21, 15:1-2, 10, 13, 22:42, 2 Kings 10:13, 24:8-12, Jeremiah 13:18, 29:2. Every single time that a new king of Israel and/or Judah is mentioned, his queen mother is always mentioned! They reigned together! The Kingdom of Jesus Christ IS like the Kingdom of David. Christ is the King of the Jews just like David was. The Bible says that Christ’s kingdom is the fulfillment and CONTINUATION of the Davidic Kingdom (Mark 11:10; Luke 1:31-33). Christ’s kingdom has EVERYTHING that the Davidic Kingdom had, in its fulfilled form. This INCLUDES the queen mother! Pointing out that Jesus never called Mary a queen, but that’s an irrelevant argument from silence, which ultimately doesn’t work because the Bible DOES refer to the mother of Jesus as a queen in Revelation 12! She has the CROWN of 12 stars on her head, and she is the mother of all who believe in the messiah! This is called the typological reading of Scripture - reading the New Testament in light of the Old . When you read the New Testament like a JEW, you get Catholicism! Your theology divorces the New Covenant from its Jewish roots.
Are you saying that God isn’t powerful enough to create anyone without sin after Adam and Eve? Is God not capable of doing such a thing? See, Mary was indeed saved from sin, but she was saved by being kept from falling into sin in the first place. When we sin, Jesus saves us from pulling us out of sin. Mary would have been born into sin, but Jesus saved her by creating her with the original grace/justice that Adam and Eve had. So Jesus did save Mary, but He saved her by preventing her from ever falling into sin, which Jude 1:24 says God can do. Whether He saves someone by pulling them out of sin or by preventing them from falling into sin, He still saved them. Mary needed a savior because she WOULD have been born with original sin had Jesus not intervened. He saved her from all sin, including original sin. And I explain the Biblical basis for this in this video. And I agree that we should honor Mary the way scripture says we should! Do you call Mary your mother??? Because John 19 and Revelation 12 calls her the mother of the Church. If you don’t consider Mary your mother, then you are NOT honoring her the way Scripture says we should. In fact, you are dishonoring Christ Himself, who, in His very last act before dying on the cross, gave us His mother to be our own.
@ Alright, my friend, I hear you loud and clear about the “Hail” debate. You’re saying that in Matthew 28:9, Jesus wasn’t greeting the women but commanding them to hail Him, and they did worship Him because, well, He’s the risen Son of God. Fair enough. But in Luke 1:28, when the angel greets Mary with “chaire,” it’s still just a joyful salutation, not some declaration that Mary holds divine status alongside Jesus. You can’t see that you’re reading something into text that just isn’t there over a greeting? Angels would have known that Mary, like all men are God’s favored creation, made in His image, especially ones that are redeemed. Mary had faith, and was obviously saved by Jesus. His sacrifice covers all sin, even past sin before His crucifixion. So Mary was definitely royalty, just like every believer in Christ is called “heirs” “children of God”, “kings” and “royal priesthood”. So even if “hail” was only meant for royalty, it still fits in context because God made us royal. Mary was highly favored, blessed among women, but the key here is among women. The angel isn’t putting her on a pedestal as co-equal with Christ. The focus is always on what God has done through her, not on Mary herself. She’s honored, not deified. Also, I did a quick search in my interlinear Bible and I found a couple more. Acts 15:23 in a letter sent from the elders to gentiles uses chaire, and James 1:1 where he greets “the twelve tribes scattered across the nation”. Both times it’s translated as “greetings”. I also found many different examples outside of the Bible from that time period and region of “chaire” being used as a joyful greeting.
Now, about this idea that every king’s mother was automatically the queen, I think you’re overstating things a bit. Sure, there’s precedent for the “queen mother” role in Israelite tradition, but not every single king had a reigning queen mother mentioned. Even in the cases where she’s honored, she doesn’t hold authority over the king. And comparing this to Christ’s kingdom gets tricky. Yes, His kingdom fulfills the Davidic promises, but Jesus flips the script in so many ways. He’s not a king like David, constrained by earthly traditions. He’s the King of Kings, reigning supreme over all creation. Nowhere in Scripture does He ever establish Mary as queen in His kingdom. You referenced Revelation 12, but that’s not a slam dunk for your argument. The woman in Revelation 12 is a symbolic figure, representing Israel or the Church, not exclusively Mary. The crown of twelve stars? That’s about the twelve tribes of Israel, not Mary’s personal coronation. Let’s be careful not to read into the text something that isn’t clearly there.
I see where you’re going with the immaculate conception argument, but there’s a big assumption in play here. The Bible never says Mary was sinless. In fact, Mary herself says, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Luke 1:46-47). Why would she need a Savior if she were without sin? The idea that she was preemptively saved from sin isn’t biblical; it’s a theological invention. Jude 1:24, which you cited, is about God keeping believers from stumbling through His grace, not about creating someone sinless from birth. And while God is all-powerful and certainly could have created Mary sinless, the question is, did He? Scripture doesn’t teach that He did. It teaches that Jesus alone is sinless (2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Peter 2:22).
As for John 19 and Revelation 12 calling Mary the mother of the Church, I think you’re stretching the text again. In John 19, Jesus entrusts Mary to John, not to establish her as the mother of all believers but to ensure she’s cared for after His death. It’s a personal, loving act. Revelation 12’s symbolism, as I mentioned earlier, isn’t about Mary. The Church doesn’t need a “mother” other than God Himself, who created and sustains it through Christ.
Look, I’m not here to tear down your devotion. Mary’s story is beautiful, and her faith is inspiring. But devotion becomes dangerous when it shifts our focus away from Jesus. Christ is the center of our faith, the only mediator, the only King, the only Savior. Let’s honor Mary the way the Bible does, as a humble servant of the Lord who points us to Jesus, not as someone who competes for His glory.
Why didn't God have the actual church fathers write this in the Bible?
Never did Jesus called Mary "MOTHER" but "WOMAN". Where in the bible did Jesus called Mary "Mother"?
LUKE 8:19-21 ~ Now Jesus’ mother and brothers came to see him, but they were not able to get near him because of the crowd. 20 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to see you.”
21 He replied, “MY MOTHER AND BROTHERS ARE THOSE WHO HEAR GOD’S WORD AND PUT IT INTO PRACTICE.”
Before Jesus turned the Jar into wine because Mary is leading Him to do miracle, Jesus said
John 2:4 ~And Jesus said to her, "Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come."
But remember, Jesus didn't disrespected Mary here, but Jesus followed, showing that even the time is not right, He can do miracles, for He is God and Human at the same time. Can God call His Creation "MOTHER"?
John 19:26 ~When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son!"
Now, how come MARY is the COREDEEMER of Christ? Did Mary got CRICIFIED? Did SHE DIED FOR OUR SINS?
JOHN 14:6 ~ 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
In other word, GOD IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD.
Women is referring to her higher role in Gods plan…
Geniuses 3:15
Revelations 12:17
Did Jesus EVER refute her?
So because Jesus was never recorded as calling Mary His mother does it mean she wasn't His mother?
@@dherpin4874 don't think to much, the Apostles didn't gave too much emphasis to Mary, have you ever read the entire bible? I'm not sure why Moses wrote Genesis 3:15 and is now causing confusion, but you should be aware that Jesus is the protagonist here. I believe that the verse is also mentioning Mary, but for Revelation 3:17, read the whole Revelation 3, it's not talking about Mary, I'm also not sure of the meaning, but it's not Mary, read.
Revelation 12:5-6 ESV
[5] She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne, [6] and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which she is to be nourished for 1,260 days.
Is that child Jesus? I think it's not (edit: it might really be talking about Jesus and Mary, but not for us to pray or worship Mary, that's idolatry and lack of knowledge about what God did), but one thing is sure, this isn't literal. Don't you know that God hate people praying to the dead people? Jesus resurrected right? He is not dead, pray to Jesus, not to Mary or to any saints. He is our only mediator to God, I can't give time to finding verses. I apologize if you think I'm being rude, I'm also seeking truth, not because I'm confused, but because I'm accepting "Truth". If what's true is true, then why don't we accept it? Accepting Truth is important.
@@darrellperez1029 Have you read what I've commented? Jesus said that His "mother and brothers are those who hear God and put it into practice", now, can any woman call Jesus her Son? Not at all, because it's not literal. But Jesus denied Mary here.
Matthew 12:48-50
But he replied to the man who told him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 And >>>STRETCHING OUT HIS HAND TOWARDS HIS DISCIPLES
i thought orthodoxy deny the immaculate conception
Sort of, but because they don't believe in original sin. Many orthodox have something they call ancestral sin and do believe in the fallen nature of man.
Generally speaking, the EO deny a false version of the Catholic doctrine of original sin. If I may be so bold, I think that most of them, with careful thought and charitable reading of Catholic teaching, would come to agree with the actual doctrine of original sin.
But yeah, since they reject that false version of original sin, they reject a faulty version of the Immaculate Conception as well.
@@input-latency2684Orthodox are heretic
They reject is because it was made into a Catholic Dogma. If you ask an Orthodox person if Mary was sinless and was there ever a time when she was not in God's grace, they will agree that Mary was both sinless and was always in God's grace.
The funny part is that they object to Mary always being in God's grace through a special gift, but believe that all babies are born in God's grace as Catholics believe Mary was.
@@input-latency2684 That is what I found as well.
Wow, this is deep.
Isaiah 63:10
…Revelations 12:17 “And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”
@@dherpin4874 those that do not have the cornerstone in place are in for a surprise. Galatians 4:26
@ so very true
it was about the Messiah. Prophecy.
Dios te aga un santo!
💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Alright, let’s talk about Mary’s so-called perpetual virginity. First off, Ultimately this doctrine doesn’t really matter much to me either. What does my salvation have to do with whether Marry ever had relations with a man? It’s silly to think my standing with God relies on me believing this, but for truth and accuracy’s sake , and because these doctrines are used to justify actual heretical and salvific beliefs, let’s explore.
The idea that Luke 1 shows Mary had taken a lifelong vow of virginity? That doesn’t hold water. When Mary says, “How can this be, since I know not man?” she’s simply pointing out that she and Joseph hadn’t been together yet. They were betrothed, sure, but in Jewish culture, that’s like being engaged. Committed to marriage but not living together or, you know, doing what married people do. If Mary had taken some radical lifelong vow of virginity, it begs the question “why even marry Joseph?” What was he signing up for? A chaste roommate situation? Doesn’t sound like something God would orchestrate.
Now, about Judges 11 and Jephthah’s daughter, I get why that’s brought up, but let’s not overreach. Jephthah’s daughter says, “I will know not man” because she’s resigned to a tragic life of singleness due to her dad’s ill considered vow. That’s a completely different situation. Mary’s line, “I have known not man,” is present tense. She’s just explaining the current state of things. It’s not some coded declaration of a perpetual vow.
And about Jesus’ brothers. Here we go. Yes, Matthew 13 names them. James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas. Then the claim is made that they aren’t really Mary’s kids but sons of some other Mary mentioned at the crucifixion, the wife of Clopas. Okay, but let’s not miss the forest for the trees here. The Bible repeatedly calls these guys Jesus’ brothers. Not “cousins,” not “close relatives,” but “adelphoi”which is the literal standard Greek word for brothers. Yes, the Greek language sometimes uses adelphoi more broadly, but context matters. Why would the people in Jesus’ hometown in Matthew 13 think these were Mary’s sons if they weren’t? Were they all just confused about who lived under one roof? Saying Greek has no words for other close family members is just wrong. The Bible does use specific terms. For example, in Colossians 4:10, Paul refers to Mark as “Barnabas’s cousin” using the Greek word anepsios, which means cousin. A quick search in my interlinear Bible app shows a bunch of examples. Luke 1:36 refers to Mary’s close relative Elizabeth with the word “suggenes”. Acts 23:16 Paul’s “nephew” is mentioned using the Greek huios tes adelphes” which literally translates to “son of his sister”. If the Gospel writers wanted to say Jesus’ brothers were actually cousins, they could’ve said it. But they didn’t, they used adelphoi, which in context, literally, and plainly read means brothers. The language is there, it’s just not supporting your claim.
And if Mary were a perpetual virgin, why does Matthew 1:25 make it so clear that Joseph “knew her not until she had brought forth her firstborn son”? That “until” implies something changed afterward. It doesn’t say Joseph never knew her, it says he didn’t until Jesus was born. Your refutation of this argument is weak. What’s the first rule about reading scripture? Context context context Also, the term “firstborn” naturally implies there were more children to follow. You don’t call an only child the “firstborn,” do you? That would be weird.
The real kicker is this, if the church is supposedly divinely inspired to believe Mary was a perpetual virgin, why doesn’t the Bible come out and say it? Why is this doctrine built on such a shaky stack of assumptions, linguistic gymnastics, and indirect arguments? You’d think something so central to Mary’s role would be crystal clear, but it’s not. What is clear is that Mary was an incredible woman who played a unique, God ordained role in bringing the Savior into the world. But perpetual virginity? That’s adding to Scripture, and last I checked, Revelation 22:18-19 had some strong words about that.
I’ll continue my refutation of the rest of these dogmas tomorrow. Feel free to challenge.
The bible teaches about, Mary, while the catholic church teaches Maryoligy, which is not found in scripture!
What scripture?
I mean where in scripture is this idea that it has to be in scripture.
Oh that tradition of men. Bible only.
You preach another gospel
@iggyantioch it's the same gospel that was preached by the apostles and prophets, in the Spirit of God, not in catholicism? Galatians 1:8-9! you need the Spirit of God to discern the Word of God, since he is a Spirit, and his word is Spiritual! Why catholics don't understand what being born again of the Spirit is all about? Since catholics read all about catholicism, read, "far from Rome, near to God!" About 50 priests that left the catholic church, some with over 20 years as priests! You decide after reading the book, and comparing that, with the catholic church, and what God has to say in the bible? 50 priests is just a drop in the bucket: there also many nuns and lay catholics that have also found the true meaning of salvation in Gods Word, not in the catholic church! Jesus was serious when he told Nicodemus, that, "you need to be born again, to see or enter into the kingdom of God!" That applies to all, not just Nicodemus?
@@louisvega-oe2sc
Hey listen I appreciate you and your heartfelt concern.
Keep the faith 👊.
@@louisvega-oe2sc Jesus told him to be born of water (baptism) and of spirit. But, how many Protestants throw out baptism as a sacrament?
As a former Protestant who used to debate a lot of Catholics and Orthodox, what I found was that Protestantism is based on MANY false assumptions of what the Bible actually says. The only way to be Protestant is to remove the Bible from its historical and cultural background AND remove the underlying assumptions that the early Christians actually believed (which is why it isn't explicitly spelled out) and then reinterpret everything from a materialistic western mindset.
Protestants are so hypocritical. They pick and choose what they want to believe from the early Church Councils in regard to the doctrines of the Holy Trinity and Jesus Christ's two natures (fully God, fully man) and say that they got it right, but anything that they don't agree with, they just throw it out and say that they got it wrong.
I have seen many Protestants argue to atheists that the Councils of Rome or Carthage gave us the canon of the New Testament and they got that right. Yet, will then claim that the SAME councils also gave the canon of the Old Testament that included the 7 Deuterocanonical books that they removed somehow got the OT canon wrong.
When you remove all evidence and explain away everything, its easy to come up with your own new version of Christianity that never existed before the 16th Century.
Why did Jesus have stepbrothers?
@@vazgl100 According to Protestant doctrine, as soon as Jesus was born, she and Joseph had full on sex in the stable.
@@vazgl100James was Jesus's cousin.
@vazgl100 Orthodox tend to view Jesus's siblings as his step-siblings.
Cultural/language misunderstandings of modern western people. If you actually read the gospels and very early Christian history the 4 people listed (James, Joseph, Jude, Simeon) are cousins. This is also why even the first major Protestants (Luther, Calvin and Zwingli) all actually believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary.
@@fantasia55 Yes, they believe that Joseph was an old man and had kids from a prior marriage. This comes from an apocryphal source (Protoevangelium of James) that doesn't match up with the gospels and early Church history saying that they were cousins.
As a universalist in the vein as St Gregory or George MacDonald, I’d say there will be a time when Jesus will not have enemies, but obviously he will still reign over us. All of us.
God revealed his truth through the prophets, and there are no prophets since John, so anything considered truth after John would not be considered truth, so any teaching outside of what was revealed by the prophets should be tested against scripture, prima scriptura then tradition, there should be a paper or oral trail all the way back to the actual Apostles, there should not be a missing link between the Apostles and dogmas.
The idea that rejecting Marian dogmas makes one a heretic is, frankly, one of the most spiritually binding and unbiblical claims I’ve ever encountered. To say that my salvation hinges not on faith in Christ’s finished work on the cross but on whether I affirm traditions like the Immaculate Conception or the Assumption, doctrines not explicitly found in Scripture, is the very definition of heretical. It chains believers to an unchallengeable system that demands allegiance to man-made declarations, rather than the Word of God.
Jesus never said, “Believe in Mary’s sinlessness or her bodily assumption, and you will be saved.” He said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Paul echoes this in Romans 10:9: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Nowhere in the Bible does it say, “Oh, and by the way, add a belief in Marian dogmas to the list or you’re out.”
The very idea that my eternal standing before God could depend on affirming teachings that emerged centuries after the apostles walked the earth is not just unscriptural, it’s dangerous. It turns salvation into a theological minefield, where you must navigate extra-biblical doctrines to avoid condemnation. This undermines the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement and the clarity of the Gospel. When Paul warned against “another gospel” in Galatians 1:8, this is exactly the kind of thing he was talking about.
Here’s the irony: those who insist on Marian dogmas accuse others of heresy, yet the real heresy lies in elevating these human traditions to salvific importance. It’s not faith in Christ plus a checklist of dogmas. It’s faith alone in Christ alone. If your system requires people to believe what Scripture doesn’t teach to avoid damnation, it’s no longer Christianity. It’s spiritual extortion.
I love each and every one of you and hope you allow Christ to break those self imposed chains that drag you down and keep you bound to man and his tradition, and apart from Christ and His perfect word. ❤
Mary Magdalene she was kin to marry
“My Saviour”-Mary. Luke 1
Mary needed a saviour. From her sin. Jesus is Lord. Mary is not.
@@jordantheriverman6143 I guess you didn’t actually watch the video 👀
I don't think the parallel to Judge 11 is equivalent. In Judge 11 of course she would remain a virgin if she would be then sacrifice. Also, not even in the Catholic Bible says the same words of know not man, so not sure why you say it says the same.
He said in the greek language the words are the same
@jmossbernee1045 isn't Judge from the old testament, so it originally would not be Greek?
@@joshuarivera2422 There is the Old testamene written in Greek that the apostoles and early church used. Its called the Septuagint
Well I just view the video again, and he does not say that in the Greek it says the exact same. He just say that it says the exact same, without specifying language.
@@joshuarivera2422 The Greek Septuagint was the OT that the early Christians used. Since the authors of the New Testament were Jews who thought as Jews, but were writing the NT in Greek it is helpful to see how Jewish thought is written in the Greek language.
Mary sinned!
What sins did she commit?
@@georgepierson4920 All have sinned and fall short to the glory of God.
And Mary said:
“My soul glorifies the Lord
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
(Luke 1:46-47)
If you are not a sinner. You don't need a savior.
She did not !!!!! Know what the Church teaches
@@FaithInChrist-l1i
Is a "Savior" someone that saves people from SIN and nothing else? Or can the word "Savior" refer to someone who saves people from situations OTHER THAN SIN ?
I would love to have a sit down with you and ask you questions, don’t give your own opinions give chapter and verse that show evidence of your claims . We have to be careful not to add to the Bible, Please give literal evidence, you have not done that. Your arguments are not heavy!!!!!!!!!
Chapter and verse that say their are 27 boo,s in the new testament, you only know that because the Catholic church say so, none Catholic have no say, because all their church are man made
Calling Mary the “Mother of God” sounds noble, but it’s not quite accurate biblically and this is why. Mary is the mother of Jesus’ human nature, not His divine nature. Jesus has existed eternally as God the Son, He didn’t get His start in Mary’s womb. While Mary played a vital role in God’s plan by bringing Jesus into the world, she didn’t “create”, originate, or have anything to do with His divinity.
It’s like this, if I build a house, you might call me the “mother” of the house’s design, but you wouldn’t call me the “mother of wood and bricks”. They existed before I started. Similarly, Mary contributed to Christ’s humanity, but she didn’t contribute to His eternal deity.
The title “Mother of God” was historically used to affirm Jesus’ full divinity during early church debates, which is good because we all agree Jesus is fully God and fully man. But if you’re using it to elevate Mary to some quasi-divine status, nope, not biblical. Mary would be the first to point you back to her Son, saying, “Do whatever He tells you” (John 2:5).
So, love and respect Mary? Absolutely! Worship or elevate her above her role? Hard pass. Only Jesus gets that glory. Now, Catholics will often say, “We don’t worship Mary, we venerate her.” But let’s be real, bowing, praying to her and statues of her, calling on her for help like she’s omnipresent, attributing salvific responsibility to her, and giving her titles like “Queen of Heaven” sure looks and smells like worship. If you’re doing things for Mary that you’d only do for God, it’s worship, no matter what you call it. Mary wouldn’t stand for it. Mary would point you straight to her Son Jesus, where all the glory belongs.
Overall, I have the least amount of problem with this title as long as the goal is to say something about Christ, not Mary, and as long as my salvation does not rest (even in part) on wether or not I call her that, but as we can see, that’s exactly what has happened. This is why so many have a problem with it, because it’s therefore used to justify other Mariology.
And let’s not get confused or distracted with the Nestorian heresy. That heresy is not what Protestants believe. That heresy said that Jesus was 2 separate people. No Protestant believes this. Christ is one person, who took human form through Mary. Fully God (not Mary) fully man (by God through Mary).
41:42 The joke normally says "I could just forgive you, but I'll kill my son to appease myself then I'll forgive you" but being theologicaly in depth the joke should say "Yes sin could've ended with Adam and Eve but it didn't so what I'll do is I'll create one sinless woman, then she'll have a son, which is my son, which is me, and I'll have him die for your sins so I could possibly forgive you"
This video wasn't a waste of time.