Superb. I've a 1996 993 C2 iris blue metallic, 66,000 miles, 6-speed manny tranny, varioram, LSD. No CEL, no oil leaks. Multi-show full-concours winner. It drives like a Swiss watch. Yes, I do my own maintenance.
933 turbo is the bee knees, had a poster on the wall as a youngster. 996 was a let down styling and engine-wise, apart from gt3 and turbo. 997 styling an improvement, but still let down by engine problems, apart from gt3 and turbo again. 997.2 gt3, especially the 4.0, is my dream car.
Best looking 911 ever made. A dream car. PS: You mentioned Turbo S but completely forgot the GOAT air cooled 993 GT2 which was the rear wheel drive twin turbo. One was just sold at Sotherbys at 2.4 million US Dollars.
Are you sure the turbos are working correctly in the car? You should be getting 80% or so of the torque from about 2500rpms increasing to max out at around 4000+ but the difference in that range is not that material… ?
Also that fuel economy figure sounds scary… have you been gutting the engine constantly? Else might need a tune… you should get 18ltr -20ltr per 100 or so around Melbourne
Superb.
I've a 1996 993 C2 iris blue metallic, 66,000 miles, 6-speed manny tranny, varioram, LSD. No CEL, no oil leaks. Multi-show full-concours winner. It drives like a Swiss watch. Yes, I do my own maintenance.
933 turbo is the bee knees, had a poster on the wall as a youngster. 996 was a let down styling and engine-wise, apart from gt3 and turbo. 997 styling an improvement, but still let down by engine problems, apart from gt3 and turbo again. 997.2 gt3, especially the 4.0, is my dream car.
Best looking 911 ever made. A dream car.
PS: You mentioned Turbo S but completely forgot the GOAT air cooled 993 GT2 which was the rear wheel drive twin turbo. One was just sold at Sotherbys at 2.4 million US Dollars.
Are you sure the turbos are working correctly in the car? You should be getting 80% or so of the torque from about 2500rpms increasing to max out at around 4000+ but the difference in that range is not that material… ?
Great looking car btw…
Also that fuel economy figure sounds scary… have you been gutting the engine constantly? Else might need a tune… you should get 18ltr -20ltr per 100 or so around Melbourne
8:57 "Bunch of....metaphors" I think maybe you meant!! Hahahaha
But you're behind the wheel not me, I'll be ok with some analogies today!!
I'd take this over a Lambo or Mclaren 720S or Recent second hand Ferrari any day, only problem is, this costs more.
Your fuel economy can’t be right. I think your computer needs a reset.
Correct, mine consumes max 12 L /100km