Thank you. I’m Catholic, attend the TLM and am increasingly confused by so many things happening within the Roman Catholic Church. Seems to me they want one world religion. Bishop Sanborn speaks the truth of our faith every time. I’m never confused or perplexed by his words. This is how it should be, God never changes and neither does our faith. We are supposed to strive to overcome our vices and failings as human beings, not descend into what the world wants. God bless you both.
Because the Vatican II religion does, indeed, profess a one world religion, hence their obsession with false ecumenism, where everyone is on a journey that goes nowhere. You're on the right track, but don't attend the TLM within the Novus Ordo (if you are).
Thank you and God bless you Bishop Sanborn ! There is so much to learn , understand and to be explained for me. I just realized that. I highly appreciate your clear and precise presentation of the topic. Advent greetings of 2024 for you from Krokow Poland !!!
Don't kick yourself about it. I thought JPII was good !!! Once you find a thread, pull it. Investigate, study, pray. God will lead you to the true Church. It takes time but God will give you the grace to understand
This was interesting, I did knew of the almost borderline “cult” for Archbishop Lefebvre, which was one the reason for me leaving the SSPX, it is very disturbing once you really think about it!
@@jimmyhun91 The catholic church is not an organization or merr institution it is as Pius XII put it so well the mystical body of Christ. Also communion is not something so clear cut as the ultramontanists in their wrong interpretation of Vatican I claim. Whether or not you believe the SSPX to be a cult is up to you, but remember many organizations are in the catholic church that are not legally part of the ordinary hierarchy, like the personal prelature Opus Dei and other institutes. What really is a cult is saying you are catholic but really negating the visible authority of the church which the sedes do imo, and it is lutheran in practice while Lefebrve was merely justifiably or unjustifiably disobedient in some disciplinary questions!
@karlheven8328 Bishop Sanborn is consistent in his theological position, unlike the SSPX, which has to rely on tribal myths from 1970s Ecône to justify the lunancy of R&R. And you say he's running a sect, please.
@@karlheven8328Also, why do you place Bishop Sanborn in inverted commas ? If you're questioning the legitimacy of his orders, you're simply plain wrong and need to do some more research before you comment in ignorance.
@@jimmyhun91 If you study the History of the Catholic Church you'd find that the most recurring similarity of heretics and schismarics is their consistency in error. Before you claim R&R is lunacy, I'd be good if you take into account the situation at hand historically and from the perspective of the hierarchy, R&R is not a doctrine or a new theory just a way of dealing with an extraordinary crisis right now.
Bishop Sanborn and Father Jenkin were right .Who would believe the Church is in such a mess now.I remember seeing a video of them both when they were young priests .I was impressed then and now .All clergy in the Catholic Church worldwide should be taught by Bishop Sanborn and father Jenkin .They stood firm for the Faith and I believe they are right
“an extremely rudimentary presentation of the theology of satisfaction (seen as) a mechanism of an injured and reestablished right. It would be the manner with which the justice of God, infinitely offended, would have been reconciled anew by an infinite satisfaction…some texts of devotion seem to suggest that the Christian faith in the Cross understands God as a God whose inexorable justice required a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of his own Son. And we flee with horror from a justice, the dark anger of which removes any credibility from the message of love” (translated from the German version, pages 232-233).
Thank you. I’m Catholic, attend the TLM and am increasingly confused by so many things happening within the Roman Catholic Church. Seems to me they want one world religion. Bishop Sanborn speaks the truth of our faith every time. I’m never confused or perplexed by his words. This is how it should be, God never changes and neither does our faith. We are supposed to strive to overcome our vices and failings as human beings, not descend into what the world wants. God bless you both.
Bishop Sanborn is a great Bishop because when he speaks even a non educated person like myself can understand him
Because the Vatican II religion does, indeed, profess a one world religion, hence their obsession with false ecumenism, where everyone is on a journey that goes nowhere. You're on the right track, but don't attend the TLM within the Novus Ordo (if you are).
Thank you, Bishop Sanborn, and Stephen.
Our Lady Seat of Wisdom, pray for us.
Thank you and God bless you Bishop Sanborn !
There is so much to learn , understand and to be explained for me. I just realized that. I highly appreciate your clear and precise presentation of the topic. Advent greetings of 2024 for you from Krokow Poland !!!
Great interview again. Thank you, Bishop Sanborn and Stephen!
Thanks!
For a long while I thought Ratzinger was a good pope. I’m sorry for ever thinking that. How stupid could I have been!
Don't kick yourself about it. I thought JPII was good !!! Once you find a thread, pull it. Investigate, study, pray. God will lead you to the true Church. It takes time but God will give you the grace to understand
We all were . Both guilty of crimes against humanity . See the document .
@@leoniea138 Which document?
I thought at some point burguie was kosher…
This was interesting, I did knew of the almost borderline “cult” for Archbishop Lefebvre, which was one the reason for me leaving the SSPX, it is very disturbing once you really think about it!
What is borderline about it and how does it justify associating yourself with this sect of 'Bp. Sanborn'?
@@jimmyhun91 The catholic church is not an organization or merr institution it is as Pius XII put it so well the mystical body of Christ. Also communion is not something so clear cut as the ultramontanists in their wrong interpretation of Vatican I claim.
Whether or not you believe the SSPX to be a cult is up to you, but remember many organizations are in the catholic church that are not legally part of the ordinary hierarchy, like the personal prelature Opus Dei and other institutes.
What really is a cult is saying you are catholic but really negating the visible authority of the church which the sedes do imo, and it is lutheran in practice while Lefebrve was merely justifiably or unjustifiably disobedient in some disciplinary questions!
@karlheven8328 Bishop Sanborn is consistent in his theological position, unlike the SSPX, which has to rely on tribal myths from 1970s Ecône to justify the lunancy of R&R. And you say he's running a sect, please.
@@karlheven8328Also, why do you place Bishop Sanborn in inverted commas ? If you're questioning the legitimacy of his orders, you're simply plain wrong and need to do some more research before you comment in ignorance.
@@jimmyhun91 If you study the History of the Catholic Church you'd find that the most recurring similarity of heretics and schismarics is their consistency in error. Before you claim R&R is lunacy, I'd be good if you take into account the situation at hand historically and from the perspective of the hierarchy, R&R is not a doctrine or a new theory just a way of dealing with an extraordinary crisis right now.
Bishop Sanborn and Father Jenkin were right .Who would believe the Church is in such a mess now.I remember seeing a video of them both when they were young priests .I was impressed then and now .All clergy in the Catholic Church worldwide should be taught by Bishop Sanborn and father Jenkin .They stood firm for the Faith and I believe they are right
Deo gratias
His Excellency's Requiem was a trap for us to get bit by a mosquito. That's what I remember
Could you link the Benedict XVI quote against the Atonement?
Introduction to Christianity, 1968.
“an extremely rudimentary presentation of the theology of satisfaction (seen as) a mechanism of an injured and reestablished right. It would be the manner with which the justice of God, infinitely offended, would have been reconciled anew by an infinite satisfaction…some texts of devotion seem to suggest that the Christian faith in the Cross understands God as a God whose inexorable justice required a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of his own Son. And we flee with horror from a justice, the dark anger of which removes any credibility from the message of love” (translated from the German version, pages 232-233).
So he was neither a prophet nor a profit! 😮
They are heretic