I see that you have now purchased the Canon RF 100-300mm f2.8! I am in a similar situation where I have the RF 600 f4 with my R5. I also have the RF 100-500 f4.5-7.1, but I struggle with that in low light. I also have the RF 1.4 and 2x extenders. I will be going to Antarctica and Patagonia later this year and also Africa next year. Do you think I would have more use for the 100-300 instead of the 100-500? Appreciate your thoughts. Are you happy with the purchase?
Puh, tricky question. I really like the Nikon lens setup, but their supertele are very expensive compared to Canon. And I absolutely love my Canon 100-300/2.8. it would be a very hard choice between the two. Sony seems a little bit less interesting to me at the moment, but I‘m also not shooting it a lot
I have never used camuflash coating of my lenses, and have had white lenses since the nlnties. Never have a bird or a deer been spoked! It's waving around with the lens that sceards the animals. I always mowe the lens slowly. And by the way, Fotographing small birds with camu clothes is no good. I use bright shiny yellow jacket, and mowe very slowly towards the birds. Than they have controll where I am, and can get really close to them. However, waterbirds is different. Than I use camoclotes. So I have done in 55 years, and it works!
@@FabianFoppNaturephotography Cannon has a special paint on the telelenses to reflect the heat from the sun. If thw lens gets too warm it eexpands and you won't get sharp photos.
I ordered the lens carrier after watching your video from last year. At first it seems to be a fantastic idea to carry my 600mm around. In the end my back gets quite painfull after a medium/long walk. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong with it but I went back to my trusty monopod + wimberley MH-100 head. I tried a lot of thing but for me nothing beat this setup for lightweight/long hikes. I can do 4-5 hours hikes with it without any pain or fatigue it's awesome. :) For lens cap check out Zemlin. Very good stuff! Also I was quite interested in the roland pro coat.. Until you showed how to unviel the buttons.... xD Velcro? Really guys?.. ^^'
hi Fabian If you are afraid that your camera will become dirty, switch to the Om-system camera, which can withstand wet weather conditions very well.😂🙏👏
So lenses on the OM system is completely resistant to scratch or show any wear or tear ever? I think the point was just to keep your lenses looking nice longer with a protective layer.
Dirty is not the issue, bud mud or fine sand. I have the OM-1 II sitting in my shelf right now, but so far I trust it no more or no less in rough conditions than my R5
@@FabianFoppNaturephotography hi Fabian the OM-1 has an IP-53 classification and is practically dust and water tight, which the Canon R5 is certainly not. That being said . I'd rather be hit by a rain shower with an OM-1 than with a Canon R5😂👍😇
I see that you have now purchased the Canon RF 100-300mm f2.8! I am in a similar situation where I have the RF 600 f4 with my R5. I also have the RF 100-500 f4.5-7.1, but I struggle with that in low light. I also have the RF 1.4 and 2x extenders. I will be going to Antarctica and Patagonia later this year and also Africa next year. Do you think I would have more use for the 100-300 instead of the 100-500? Appreciate your thoughts. Are you happy with the purchase?
Yes, so far I‘m very happy with it! I will do a review later this year. Unfortunately I can’t give you specific tips for you journeys.
What camera system do you like the most? Canon, Nikon or Sony in wildlife photography?
Puh, tricky question. I really like the Nikon lens setup, but their supertele are very expensive compared to Canon. And I absolutely love my Canon 100-300/2.8. it would be a very hard choice between the two. Sony seems a little bit less interesting to me at the moment, but I‘m also not shooting it a lot
Where did you get your large lens cap from? I’m struggling to find one for my Nikon 400 2.8e
I got mine here: www.augenblicke-eingefangen.de/snap-on-objektivdeckel-fuer-canon-ef/rf-600-f/4-rf-1200-f/8?number=AE21650&c=143&sPartner=55eca566
@@FabianFoppNaturephotography will see if 200-400 is available
I have never used camuflash coating of my lenses, and have had white lenses since the nlnties. Never have a bird or a deer been spoked! It's waving around with the lens that sceards the animals. I always mowe the lens slowly. And by the way, Fotographing small birds with camu clothes is no good. I use bright shiny yellow jacket, and mowe very slowly towards the birds. Than they have controll where I am, and can get really close to them. However, waterbirds is different. Than I use camoclotes. So I have done in 55 years, and it works!
I don’t use the coating for camouflage, it’s for protecting the lens
@@FabianFoppNaturephotography Cannon has a special paint on the telelenses to reflect the heat from the sun. If thw lens gets too warm it eexpands and you won't get sharp photos.
I ordered the lens carrier after watching your video from last year. At first it seems to be a fantastic idea to carry my 600mm around. In the end my back gets quite painfull after a medium/long walk. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong with it but I went back to my trusty monopod + wimberley MH-100 head. I tried a lot of thing but for me nothing beat this setup for lightweight/long hikes. I can do 4-5 hours hikes with it without any pain or fatigue it's awesome. :) For lens cap check out Zemlin. Very good stuff!
Also I was quite interested in the roland pro coat.. Until you showed how to unviel the buttons.... xD Velcro? Really guys?.. ^^'
Thanks for sharing! As mentioned, my main „issue“ is that I basically never carry a tripod or monopod 😉
hi Fabian
If you are afraid that your camera will become dirty, switch to the Om-system camera, which can withstand wet weather conditions very well.😂🙏👏
So lenses on the OM system is completely resistant to scratch or show any wear or tear ever?
I think the point was just to keep your lenses looking nice longer with a protective layer.
Dirty is not the issue, bud mud or fine sand. I have the OM-1 II sitting in my shelf right now, but so far I trust it no more or no less in rough conditions than my R5
@@FabianFoppNaturephotography hi Fabian
the OM-1 has an IP-53 classification and is practically dust and water tight, which the Canon R5 is certainly not. That being said . I'd rather be hit by a rain shower with an OM-1 than with a Canon R5😂👍😇
@@r2hildur I know the feeling - i'd never go back down to FF from MF.
algo
😊👍🏻
You should have trashed this video and start all over again...the in/out focusing is distracting...to me at least. I do enjoy your content though.
I only realised it a few days after filming unfortunately. I hope it will not happen again
looks like the XH2S autofocus tests lol. The video doesn't bother me too much because most times I just listen the audio